London Health & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 73.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment after receiving vendor recommendations. This affected eight of ten rooms observed in the facility. The facility census was 74.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 01/23/26 with diagnoses of multiple sclerosis, depression, muscle weakness, fatigue, orthostatic hypotension, and transient ischemic attack. Observation on 02/20/26 at 9:25 A.M. of Resident #24 ' s room revealed uncovered soffits located above windows with structured covered fabric window valances. When walking up to look behind the valance, pipes displayed various shapes and sizes with deep gray to black speckled staining. Pipes were covered with layers of white flaking paint-like material and some discoloration appeared to be related to the layers of paint on piping. Interview and observation of Resident #24 ' s room on 02/20/26 at 11:47 A.M. with Maintenance Director #131 confirmed various staining present on pipes above resident windows located behind the window valance.2.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-29 · tag F0887 — widespread
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the COVID-19 vaccine was offered or provided to facility staff. This had the potential to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the staff respiratory virus information fact sheet and acknowledgement, dated 10/06/23, revealed the facility would not be administering the updated COVID-19 vaccine to team members at the facility. Interview with Corporate Registered Nurse (CRN) #500 on 05/29/25 at 12:51 P.M. confirmed the COVID-19 vaccination was available at the facility and further verified the facility did not offer or provide the COVID-19 vaccination to the facility staff.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a safe, comfortable, and homelike manner. This affected four (#5, #12, #41, and #47) of 70 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Observation of the facility on 05/29/25 at 10:13 A.M. revealed there was exposed drywall with black spots on it in the corner of Resident #12, Resident #41, and Resident #47's room near the window. There was also a television that was on a wall mount that was removed from the wall with the screws exposed that was sitting on a night stand in Resident #12, Resident #41, and Resident #47's room. Interview with Maintenance Director (MD) #17 on 05/29/25 at 10:13 A.M. verified there was exposed drywall with black spots on it in the corner of Resident #12, Resident #41, and Resident #47's room near the window. MD #17 also confirmed there a television that was on a wall mount that was removed from the wall with the screws exposed that was sitting on a night stand in Resident #12, Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, review of a resident census, review of drug manufacturer instructions for use, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored in a safe and secure manner. This had the potential to affect 14 (#3, #4, #7, #18, #25, #30, #40, #42, #58, #62, #225, #226, #227, and #228) of 70 residents residing in the facility. The census was 70. Findings include: 1. Observation of the 203 hall medication cart on 05/28/25 starting at 9:14 A.M. revealed there were five (5) loose pills that were a variety of shapes and colors in the medication cart with no identification to which residents the medications belonged to. Continued observation of the medication cart at 9:17 A.M. revealed there was an opened Incruse Ellipta 62.5 microgram (mcg) inhaler prescribed to Resident #7 without a date when it was opened. Review of a resident census dated 05/29/25 revealed five (#3, #7, #18, #30, and #58) resident's medications were stored in the 203 hall medication cart. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #70 on 05/28/25 at 9:18…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, witness statements, staff and resident interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure respect and dignity was implemented for the residents. This affected two (#57 and #62) of two residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The census was 70. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 09/09/24. Medical diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident (CVA). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 was moderately cognitively impaired. His functional status was substantial/maximal assistance for eating and bed mobility, and he was dependent for toileting and for transfers. He was always incontinent for bowel and bladder. Review of the progress notes dated 05/02/25 for Resident #57 revealed they were silent for respect and dignity issues. Review of witness statement dated 05/02/25 revealed Social Service Designee (SSD) #48 interviewed Resident #57 who reported he didn't have his call…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), witness statement review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse was reported to the State Survey Agency, Ohio Department of Health (ODH). This affected one (#62) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 06/14/24. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular attack (CVA) and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was rarely or never understood and was dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. Review of a witness statement dated 05/24/25 on night shift from Resident #62 and Resident #2 revealed on 05/24/25, Resident #62 pushed his call light and 20-minutes later, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #90 came to the room on her cell phone. CNA #90 stated Now what do you want? Resident #62…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, witness statement review, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse was investigated thoroughly. This affected one (#62) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 06/14/24. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular attack (CVA) and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was rarely or never understood and was dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. Review of a witness statement dated 05/24/25 on night shift from Resident #62 and Resident #2 revealed on 05/24/25, Resident #62 pushed his call light and 20-minutes later, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #90 came to the room on her cell phone. CNA #90 stated Now what do you want? Resident #62 motioned with his hands and CNA #62 said I know you want a shower but it is going to be a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident who was at a high risk for falls and had a recent fall in the facility. This affected one (Resident #40) of seven residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed a date of admission of 11/30/22. Diagnoses included disorder of brain, delusional disorders, cerebral infarction, tremor, muscle weakness, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the plan of care dated 08/20/24 revealed Resident #40 was at risk for falls due to cognitive impairment, muscle weakness, and unsteady gait. Interventions included educating the resident on fall prevention, performing daily checks to ensure interventions were in place, and verifying interventions during morning rounds. Specific fall interventions included a fall mat at bedside, hipsters on at all times as tolerated, bed against the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's fluid restriction was followed according to physician orders. This affected one (#29) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 05/06/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary (COPD), vascular dementia, and congested heart failure (CHF). Review of the physician orders for Resident #29 dated 01/20/25 revealed a fluid restriction of 2,000 cubic centimeters (cc) for a 24-hour period. Dietary was to provide a total 1,560 cc per day, which was spread out to 600 cc at breakfast, 480 cc at lunch, and 480 cc at dinner. Nursing was to provide a total 440 cc per day, which was spread out 240 cc on first shift and 200 on second shift. Review of the care plan dated 03/18/25 revealed Resident #29 was at risk for nutrition/hydration related to CHF. Interventions were to monitor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0847 — isolated
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of an arbitration agreement, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were explained binding arbitration agreements in a form and manner the resident can understand prior to signing them. This affected one resident (#43) of three residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, hypocalcemia, encephalopathy, unspecified visual loss, atelectasis, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, hallucinations, anemia, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #43's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 03. Review of an arbitration agreement document revealed the parties understood, acknowledged, and agreed by entering into the arbitration agreement they are voluntarily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH