Amberwood Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 36.1 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.03 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain air temperatures at a comfortable level and failed to ensure floors and bathtubs were cleaned on the South unit. This affected all 22 residents (#2, #3, #5, #8, #9, #10, #11, #13, #15, #16, #17, #19, #20, #22, #24, #26, #28, #29, #31, #32, #238, and #240) who resided on the South unit. Findings Included: 1. Review of an email dated 07/31/24 at 2:35 P.M. revealed the Heating and Cooling company emailed the Administrator indicating the packaged terminal air conditioner (P-TAC ) units needed to be replaced in the facility due to the fact that they were [AGE] years old and could not be repaired anymore. Review of an email dated 09/11/24 at 4:18 P.M. revealed the Administrator emailed the Heating and Cooling company to ask if once the electricity was completed they would have to switch over right away with the new P-TAC units or could they do the electricity and then wait to install the P-TAC units. Review of an email dated 09/16/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of personal funds records and interview, the facility failed to obtain appropriate witness signatures on the authorization for handling funds. This affected one (Resident #8) of five residents whose funds were reviewed. Findings include: During an interview on 01/21/25 at 4:11 P.M., Resident #8's granddaughter stated Resident #8 was a Medicaid recipient. The family received no resources for Resident #8 and had never been asked to sign a paper authorizing the facility to handle funds. To the best of the granddaughter's knowledge, Resident #8 did not have a personal funds account with the facility. Review of a list of resident funds handled by the facility revealed Resident #8 did have a personal funds account managed by the facility. Review of the authorization and agreement to handle resident funds indicated recurring social security benefit payments were to be direct deposited into the account with automatic transfer of care cost payments to the facility with Resident #8…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered to Resident #5 and Resident #238. This affected two (Resident #5 and #238) out of six residents reviewed for medications. Facility census was 37. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #238 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, severe morbid obesity, history of transient ischemic attack, and major depressive disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #238 was cognitively intact. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #238 was ordered Lantus (insulin) 15 units at 6:00 A.M. and Lantus 50 units at 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. Resident #238 had an order from 06/25/24 for metformin (antidiabetic agent) 750 milligrams twice a day. No special instructions or parameters were in place for metformin or Lantus to be held. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) dated 01/12/25 for the 7:00 P.M. to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview the facility failed to ensure weekly wound assessments were completed for Resident #5. This affected one resident (Resident #5) of three reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, respiratory failure, diabetes, anemia, atrial fibrillation, obstructive sleep apnea, stage 4 pressure ulcer, hypertension and accidental discharge of firearms. Review of the plan of care dated 04/03/24 and edited 01/01/25 revealed Resident #5 had a wound to the left posterior thigh. Interventions included the in-house skin/wound team would see and treat him weekly and as needed. Review of the physician's order dated 10/23/24 revealed Resident #5 was ordered one gram of gentamicin cream 0.1 percent twice a day to the left posterior thigh, cleanse with normal saline, apply the gentamicin cream to the wound bed cover with an abdominal dressing and do…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place and appropriate for Resident #14. The facility also failed to ensure Resident #26's wheelchair was not locked when Resident #26 was left unattended. This affected two (Resident #14 and #26) out of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 37. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety, manic episode, epilepsy, acute kidney failure, fibromyalgia, and irritable bowel syndrome. A progress note dated 11/22/24 at 8:45 P.M. revealed Resident #14 was found on the bathroom floor in front of the toilet. Care plan for falls revealed an intervention dated 11/26/24 revealed a motion sensor to be placed in the bathroom. A progress note dated 11/29/24 at 12:24 P.M. revealed Resident #14 was found in the bathroom. Review of the fall documentation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #137 was provided fluids to maintain hydration. This affected one resident (Resident #137) of one residents reviewed for hydration. Findings include: Review of Resident #137's medical record revealed the resident was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, respiratory failure with hypoxia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, protein-calorie malnutrition, diabetic retinopathy without macular edema, chronic kidney disease stage 4 (severe), non-rheumatic mitral (valve) insufficiency, myocardial infarction, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety, and hypokalemia, Resident #137's nutritional assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #137's calculated fluid need was between 1900 milliliters (ml) to 2100 ml per day. Review of Resident #137's fluid intake documentation dated 01/12/25 to 01/21/25 indicated Resident #137's daily intake of fluid was between 480 ml and 960 ml a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure monthly drug regimen reviews identified irregularities in a resident's drug regimen and failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were responded to in a timely manner. This affected two (Residents #17 and #26) of five residents reviewed for medication use. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, malignant neoplasm of the esophagus, and chronic pain syndrome. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #17 had short and long term memory problems and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decison making. a. Review of a monthly pharmacy review dated 06/03/24 indicated Resident #17 had orders for both acetaminophen 650 milligrams (mg) every 12 hours as necessary and hydrocodone/acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication) 5/325 mg every six hours as needed for pain. The pharmacy requested clarification of the parameters…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, pharmacy recommendations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure as needed psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days without a rationale for the order to be extended. This affected one (Resident #26) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Facility census was 37. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hepatic encephalopathy, traumatic brain injury, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, vascular dementia, visual hallucinations, and violent behavior. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS also revealed Resident #26 received antianxiety and antidepressant medications. The pharmacy recommendation dated 09/06/24 revealed Resident #26 was ordered Ativan (psychotropic/antianxiety) one milligram twice a day as needed. The pharmacy recommendation revealed as needed psychotropic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based of observations, review of the medical record and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at bedside for Resident #15. This affected one resident ( Resident #15) of five residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: Review of the medical records revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hyperkalemia, acute respiratory failure, hypertension , glaucoma, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, kidney disease, dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, retention of urine, and abnormal weight loss. Review of the January 2025 physician's orders revealed Resident #15 had an order for fluticasone propionate nasal spray 50 micrograms one spray each nostril daily. He did not have an order to leave medications at bedside or he could administer himself. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had intact cognition. Observation on 01/21/25 at 8:50 A.M. revealed Resident #15 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene to prevent possible cross contamination during Resident #7's medication administration. This affected one resident (Resident #7) of five observed for medication administration. The facility census was 37. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including focal traumatic brain injury, contracture, hypertension (high blood pressure), mild intellectual disabilities, hearing loss, dysphagia, oral phase , pain, dysphagia, and oropharyngeal phase. An observation on 01/22/25 at 8:32 A.M. of Registered Nurse (RN) #364 administer medications to Resident #7 revealed RN #364 failed to perform hand hygiene prior to obtaining Resident #7's medications and dispensing the medications in a medication cup. RN #364 obtained a medication cup by placing her index finger inside the medication cup. RN #364 then proceeded to walk to the nursing station and opened a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH