Grand River Health & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 142 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 72.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-05-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, hospital record review, facility policy review, staff, and resident interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, individualized, and effective pain management program for Resident #220 who was admitted with acute pain from unspecified fracture of upper and lower end of left tibia, and nondisplaced cervical fracture caused by a motor vehicle accident. Actual Harm occurred beginning on 04/25/25 when Resident #220 did not receive the ordered medication pain reliever Oxycodone five milligram immediate release tablet every four hours as needed. The medication was not administered until 04/26/25 at 2:26 P.M. During this time, Resident #220 had complaints of unrelieved pain making it hard to sleep, perform day-to-day activities, and sleep. This affected one resident (#220) of the four residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #220's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/25/25 at 5:47 P.M. Resident #220 had diagnoses of traumatic shock,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, closed record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure timely assessments were completed and adequate interventions were implemented to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for Resident #76. Actual Harm occurred on 08/26/23 when Resident #76, who was a paraplegic and required extensive assistance to total dependence from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) including bed mobility, toileting, and transfers was found to have an unstageable (full thickness tissue loss in which the actual depth of the ulcer was obscured by slough/ dead skin) pressure ulcer to his sacrum (area at the base of the spinal cord) and a deep tissue injury (an injury to the soft tissue under the skin due to pressure and was usually over a boney prominence) to his right buttock. There was no documented evidence adequate interventions and monitoring were in place to prevent the development of these wounds or to ensure the wounds were identified prior to being an unstageable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to initiate wound care promptly upon identification of a pressure sore. This affected one resident (#72) of three residents reviewed for pressure sores. The facility census was 71. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed she was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses including cellulitis, prediabetes, and pressure sores. A wound assessment done on 09/05/25 revealed she had an unstageable pressure sore (full-thickness tissue loss and covered by necrotic tissue) on the coccyx measuring two centimeters (cm) length by two cm width with light serous exudate (clear, thin, watery plasma). No specific wound care orders were initiated or documented as completed until 09/08/25 when triad wound cream was ordered to be applied to the coccyx twice daily. The first wound nurse practitioner assessment dated [DATE] identified the wound to measure 11.5 cm length by 11.2 cm width with moderate serosanguinous exudate (clear fluid with small…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #167 had accurate documentation related to the open areas to her posterior thighs and failed to ensure treatment instructions were given to the resident and her representative upon discharge. In addition, the facility failed to follow admission and readmission physician's orders for Resident #60. This affected resident (#167) of one resident reviewed for skin conditions, non-pressure related and one resident (#60) of two residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #167's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/11/25 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis without coma, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, influenza, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Resident #167 was discharged from the facility on 04/03/25. Review of Resident #167's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to store and label drugs according to manufacture guidelines. This affected seven residents (#57, #49, #27, #41, #38, #46, and #4) and had the potential to affect all residents receiving insulin. The facility identified 17 residents (#1, # 4, #10, #22, #27, #32, #33, #34, #38, #46, #49, #57, #219, #220, #221, #225) with orders for insulin. The facility's census was 66. Findings include: Observation of the medication cart on [DATE] at 10:03 A.M. identified Lispor Kwikpen opened for Resident #57. There were two Basaglar Kwikpens for Resident #49 opened and dated [DATE] and [DATE]. Resident # 27 had an opened Lantus Solostar Pen with no open date on the device or the bag it was in. Interview on [DATE] at the time of the observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #258 and Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator/LPN #268 verified the insulin pens were not dated and/or they were expired according to manufacturing standards. Observation of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were being implemented for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) for Resident #218 with Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19). This affected one resident (#218) out of one resident reviewed for TBP. This had the potential to affect 12 residents (#2, #16, #24, #29, #34, #43, #60, #218, #220, #224, #227, #228) on Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #252's assignment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #226's indwelling Foley catheter drainage bag was not on the floor. This affected one resident (#226) of three residents reviewed for indwelling Foley catheters. The facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained during incontinence care for Resident #22. This affected one resident (#22) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. In addition, the facility failed to properly clean a glucometer prior to checking a blood sugar for Resident #58 and failed to remove…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect. This affected three residents (#41, #217, and #226) of three residents reviewed for resident rights and dignity. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #41''s medical records revealed an admission date of 09/11/21. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, obstructive and reflux uropathy, presence of urogenital implants and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician orders for May 2025 revealed an order to provide a privacy cover for the indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag every shift. Review of the care plan revised 04/07/25 revealed Resident #41 had an indwelling urinary catheter. Interventions included ensuring Resident #41 had a privacy cover for the indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag. Observations on 04/28/25 at 10:30 A.M.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #51's/Power of Attorney's (POA's) request to have her medication discontinued was completed timely. This affected one resident (#51) of one residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 07/31/22 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (MS), obstructive and reflux uropathy, dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #51's physician orders dated 02/12/25 revealed Avonex (interferon beta-1a) syringe kit 30 micrograms (mcg) per 0.5 milliliter (mL), one injection, intramuscular, once a day on Wednesdays at 12:30 P.M. Resident #51's Avonex was discontinued on 04/23/25. Review of Resident #51's progress notes dated 02/24/25 at 4:03 P.M. included Physician #277 was called regarding Resident #51's daughter request…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #217 had a working toilet. This affected one resident (#217) of one residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #217 revealed an admission date of 04/25/25. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus (DM), pain right and left knee, anxiety, depression, long term use of anticoagulants, and overactive bladder. Review of the admission Minimum data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed it was in progress. Review of the admission assessment for bowel and bladder revealed Resident #217 was continent of bladder and bowel. Interview with Resident #217 on 04/28/25 at 11:31 A.M. revealed she did not have a handle on her toilet, and it didn't flush. Resident #217 reported it was like this on admission and not fixed. Resident #217 reported she knew it didn't work because staff had to empty the bedside commode into the toilet and dump…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the fire department report and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #167 had a safe discharge. The facility failed to ensure Resident #65 had an accurate and thorough assessment for a change in condition and transfer to the hospital. This affected two residents (#65 and #167) out of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #167's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis without coma, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, influenza, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Resident #167 was discharged from the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #167's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #167 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #167 required substantial to maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, dressing, bathing and bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment was completed for Resident #43. This affected one resident (#43) of 23 residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's clinical record revealed an admission date of 03/04/24 with diagnoses including unspecified atrial fibrillation, aphasia following cerebral infarction, unspecified osteoarthritis, and essential hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #43 revealed on section A she spoke English, and it was her preferred language. The facility answered no to the question if she needed or wanted an interpreter to communicate with a doctor of healthcare staff. Section B stated staff usually understood her. Section C on the assessment stated resident is rarely or never understood so staff assessment had to be performed regarding her cognition. The staff assessment for mental status revealed she had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident #43. This affected one resident (#43) of 23 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's clinical record revealed an admission date of 03/04/24 with the diagnoses of unspecified atrial fibrillation, aphasia following cerebral infarction, unspecified osteoarthritis, and essential hypertension. Observation of Resident #43 on 04/28/25 at 10:00A.M. revealed that she was unable to speak English. Her primary language was Italian which was verified by her daughter who has a room next to the resident. Interview on 04/28/25 at 10:25 A.M. with Certified nursing Assistant (CNA) #212 stated that there was a communication sheet that was pinned on the wall on the other side of the room where Resident #43 was unable to reach. CNA #212 stated that it was not left at the bedside because something would spill on it. CNA #212 stated that the family was the primary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$66,420 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $66,420 — penalty dated 2025-05-12
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-05 for 4 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH