Urbana Health & Rehabilitation Center
741 E Water Street, Urbana, OH 43078 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (937) 652-1381 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0569)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.8% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.1% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 65.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.0% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.7% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.6% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.2% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.8% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.2% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.6% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.4%CMS range 34.8–65.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.1–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.80 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 42.2 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The following deficiency represents an incident of past non-compliance that was subsequently corrected prior to this survey. Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of radiology report, review of fall investigation, review of facility policies and procedures, and review of the facility's corrective action the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provided to a resident during a transfer using a sit to stand lift mechanical device. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #02 fell from the sit to stand lift mechanical device and subsequently sustained a fracture to the right intertrochanteric (hip). This affected one (Resident #02) of one resident reviewed for falls. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed an admission date of 03/29/17 with diagnoses including diabetes type two, dysphagia, major depression, hypothyroidism, left below the knee amputee, muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, review of maintenance work order log, and review of the facility work order process form, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were without holes in the drywall or torn wallpaper. This affected three (#09, #12, and #13) residents out of the four residents reviewed for homelike environment. The facility census was 47.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #09 revealed an admission date of 08/03/23 with medical diagnoses of vascular dementia, hypertension (HTN), anxiety, and hypothyroidism. Review quarterly of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/20/25, indicated Resident #09 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for toileting hygiene, transfers, and bathing and was independent with eating. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 09/22/22 with medical diagnoses of congestive heart failure, HTN, diabetes mellitus (DM), and anxiety.Review of a quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/12/25, indicated Resident #12 was cognitively intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Council Minutes, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident concerns were addressed in a timely manner or resolved. This affected three (#24, #35, #29) of three residents who attended a surveyor led Resident Council Meeting during the annual survey. The facility identified there were 13 residents who regularly attend resident council meetings. This had the potential to affect all of the residents who reside in the facility. The census was 46. Findings included: Review of the Resident Council Minutes from 01/28/25 through 05/13/25 revealed the following concerns were documented on the Resident/Family Council Agenda/Minutes form: 01/28/25 call lights not answered in a timely manner. 02/11/25 residents would like a smoke time added daily at 7:00 P.M. and showers are cold on the A-wing 03/02/25 call lights still not being answered in a timely manner and would like administration to enforce the rules for the staff. 03/11/25 staff speaking rudely to residents, asking administration to start addressing complaints.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have a medication error rate less than five percent. This affected two residents (#15 and #43) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 46. Findings Included: Observation on 06/04/25 of medication pass revealed 30 opportunities were observed with two errors for a medication error rate of 6.67%. 1. Review of medical records for Resident #43 revealed an admission date 07/18/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoporosis, pneumonia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 had Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 that indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of the plan of care dated 11/25/23 revealed that Resident #43 had problems with elimination and bowel constipation related to use of pain medications. Interventions included encourage fluids,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to prepared palatable food. This affected 29 residents, (#20, #39, #35, #5, #28, #2, #34, #12, #33, #198, #38, #8, #17, #27, #43, #29, #3, #13, #32, #198, #22, #10, #26, #31, #25, #24, #7, #23, and #37) who were served regular consistency textured diets. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: Review of medical records revealed the following residents had a physician order for a regular consistency textured diet, Resident #20, #39, #35, #5, #28, #2, #34, #12, #33, #198, #38, #8, #17, #27, #43, #29, #3, #13, #32, #198, #22, #10, #26, #31, #25, #24, #7, #23, and #37. Observation on 06/02/25 at 11:46 A.M. revealed Residents #11, #2, and #24 received popcorn shrimp at the lunch meal in the dining room. The shrimp had a white coating and was not browned. The residents appeared to have difficulty chewing the exterior coating. Observation on 06/02/25 at 12:06 P.M. Resident #29 received her lunch meal tray in her room. The plate contained popcorn shrimp. The shrimp had a white…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prepare food in a sanitary manner. This affected 45 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: 1. Observation on 06/02/25 at 10:05 A.M. of Diet Manger, (DM) #208 revealed white flakes of skin surrounded with bright reddened ring of skin on bilateral underside of forearms, measuring approximately four inches by two inches. When DM #208 touched the skin areas, flaky skin was removed. Interview on 06/02/25 at 10:05 A.M. with DM #208 verified the skin areas were diagnosed as a noncommunicable skin condition. DM #208 verified the skin areas should be covered due to the flaky skin. DM #208 verified her job duties include food preparation, food service and dishwashing/sanitizing. Observation on 06/04/25 at 11:17 A.M. of DM #208 revealed the skin areas on her bilateral forearms were exposed with no protective covering and the staff was observed at the three compartment sink washing/sanitizing dishes. DM #208 was also observed to assist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure facility staff performed hand hygiene. This affected one resident (#15) observed during medication pass and additionally affected three residents (#98, #5, and #99) who had their meal trays delivered by staff without hand hygiene being performed. The census was 46. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date 08/21/24. Diagnoses included chronic diastolic heart failure, depression, vascular dementia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored a one on the Brief Interview of Mental Status indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of physician orders revealed the resident had the following medication orders: Lasix (diuretic) 40 milligrams (mg) take one tablet twice a day dated 08/21/24, Senna plus (laxative) 8.6-50 mg take two tablets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Observation of Resident #29's room on 06/03/25 at 11:26 A.M., revealed the toilet was dirty and had a metal piece on the back of the toilet to hold the seat in place that had built up yellowish gray substance on it. The handwashing sink was rusted, there was tape holding the light cover in place behind her bed, the floor was dirty and sticky and the corners of the floor had a build up gray substance in the corners. Interview with Resident #29 on 06/03/25 at 11:28 A.M., revealed she didn't like her floors looking the way they do and didn't like her toilet and sink with the rust and thought they were dirty. 4. Observation of Resident #39's room on 06/03/25 at 12:26 P.M., revealed the wires to her bed control were disconnected and the resident wasn't able to control the bed movement, the floor was sticky, the light above the Handwashing sink was burned out and the light cover was a dark yellow. Around the toilet and the floor in the bathroom was a dark gray substance and the caulking around the toilet was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Medical record review for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 11/04/18. Her medical diagnoses included a stroke, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was cognitively intact. She was independent for eating, toileting, bed mobility and required a Hoyer lift for transfers. Resident #29 was always incontinent for bowel and bladder. Review of the facility provided designated smoke times revealed the residents are allowed to smoke at: 9:00 A.M., 11:00 A.M., 1:00 P.M., 4:00 P.M. and 9:00 P.M. daily. Review of Resident/family Council Agenda/Minutes dated 02/11/25 revealed the council wanted the facility to add another smoke break to the smoke between the times of 4:00 P.M. and 9:00 P.M. Review of Resident/Family Council Agenda/Minutes from 03/02/25, 03/11/25, 03/19/25, 04/08/25, 04/22/25, and 05/13/25 revealed there was no documentation included in the old business section of the minutes to address…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided dignity and respect to two residents (#22 and #21) of two residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 46. Findings Included: Review of record for Resident #22 revealed admission dated 07/03/24. Diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, depression, and nicotine dependence using cigarettes. Review of plan of care dated 08/01/24 revealed Resident #22 had risk for altered mood related to depression. Interventions included assisting residents in identify strengths, positive coping skills, anger management, approach in a calm relaxed manner, and collaborative care. Interview on 06/04/25 at 3:30 P.M. Resident #22 stated that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #240 had a conversation during care, and CNA #240 was inappropriate to her. Resident #22 stated CNA #240 had lifted her own breasts with her hands outside her shirt. Resident #22 stated CNA #240…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, resident council meeting, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were safe from abuse. This affected one (#24) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 46. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 11/10/22. Medical diagnoses included coronary artery disease, heart failure, diabetes, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and Non-Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 was cognitively intact. He was independent assistance for eating, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. He was always continent of bowel and bladder. Review of a morning meeting form dated 01/14/25 revealed Resident #24 was upset about a resident and wanted him moved to another room and was being inappropriate and screaming at Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #240 about the new resident. The note revealed CNA #240 was trying to redirect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, Resident Council meeting, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the state agency. This affected one (#24) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 46. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 11/10/22. Medical diagnoses included coronary artery disease, heart failure, diabetes, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and Non-Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 was cognitively intact. He was independent assistance for eating, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. He was always continent for bowel and bladder. Review of a morning meeting form dated 01/14/25 revealed Resident #24 was upset about a resident and wanted him moved to another room and was being inappropriate and screaming at Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #240 about the new resident. The note revealed the CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, resident council meeting, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an investigation was initiated for a allegation of abuse. This affected one (#24) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 46. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 11/10/22. Medical diagnoses included coronary artery disease, heart failure, diabetes, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and Non-Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 was cognitively intact. He was independent for eating, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. He was always continent of bowel and bladder. Review of a morning meeting form dated 01/14/25 revealed Resident #24 was upset about a resident and wanted him moved to another room and was being inappropriate and screaming at Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #240 about the new resident. The note revealed the CNA #240 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for residents who had hospice services. This affected two residents, (Residents #3 and #14) of two residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: 1. Record review of Resident #3 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #3 include dementia, anxiety, stage four kidney disease, heart disease, and shortness of breath. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for transfers and mobility. The resident received hospice services starting on 11/23/24. Review of Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) records for Resident #3 revealed no PASRR was completed when hospice services were initiated for the resident. 2. Record review of Resident #14 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, review of the care conferences and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received routine care conferences. This affected two (#29 and #39) of three residents reviewed for care conferences. The census was 46. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 11/04/18. Medical diagnoses included coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes. Review of the care conferences for Resident #29 revealed there were documented care conferences on 10/10/24 and on 02/27/25. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was cognitively intact. Interview with the Resident #29 on 06/03/25 at 11:25 A.M. revealed she had not had a care conference every three months. Interview with Social Services Designee (SWD) #214 on 06/05/25 at 10:01 A.M. revealed she was supposed to complete care conferences every three months and she was running behind. 2. Medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe homelike environment was free on unsecured potential poisonous chemicals. This affected one (#37) of 46 residents observed in the facility for potential hazards. The facility census was 46. Findings included: Observations on 06/02/25 through 06/04/25 from 9:45 A.M. to 3:30 P.M., revealed the following environmental issues. The shower room closet located in the short A unit hallway had a closure which was easily unlocked and had a bottle labeled disincentive chemical cleaner. The warning label stated to keep out of the reach of children. In the unlocked B hall unit shower room, there was a gallon size container, with a nozzle sprayer and tubing attached, on the floor. It contained a clear liquid. There was no label on the container to identify the liquid. Observations from 06/09/25 from 9:45 A.M through 3:30 P.M. revealed Resident #37 wandering in hallways, rooms and common areas, including the A and B units…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a restricted liquid diet was honored. This affected one (#39) of two reviewed for hydration during the annual survey. The census was 46. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 10/26/23. Medical diagnoses included heart failure, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, and renal insufficiency. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was independent for eating, toileting, bed mobility, and setup or clean-up assistance for transfers. She was always continent for bowel and bladder. Review of the physician's order dated 04/30/25 revealed Resident #39 was on a fluid restriction to give 1200 cubic centimeters (cc) for a 24-hour period. Dietary to give 840 cc's total, for breakfast 360 cc's, for lunch 240 cc's, and dinner 240 cc's. Observation of Resident #39's lunch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record, observation, interview, pharmacy interview, policy, the facility failed to provide safe delivery of medication by crushing potassium 20 Milliequivalent for one resident (#15) out of residents reviewed on annual. The facility census was 46. Findings Included: Review of record revealed that Resident #15 had admission date 08/21/24. Diagnoses included chronic diastolic heart failure, depression, vascular dementia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. Review of Quarter MDS dated [DATE] revealed that BIMS was 1 that indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Review of plan of care dated 08/21/24 revealed that Resident #15 had a risk for cardiac that had arteriosclerotic heart disease. Intervention was to provide small meals or frequent rather than three large meals, encourage activity level, and administer medications as ordered. Review of physician order dated 08/21/24 revealed that Resident #15 had an order to crush medications unless contraindicated. Review of physician order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not expired and the facility failed to provide safe storage and delivery of medication for one resident (#28). The facility census was 46. Findings Included: Observation on [DATE] at 8:40 A.M. of the overstock medication room, revealed there were seven bottles of Folic Acid 400 micrograms (mcg) with an expiration date was 02/2025. Interview on [DATE] at 8:40 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #204 it was verified the seven bottles of Folic Acid 400 mcg expired 02/2025. Each bottle was unopened and contained 250 tablets. Review of the facility document titled In House Stock dated unknown revealed that the facility did have Folic Acid 400 micrograms (mcg) over the counter for stock. Review of the facility policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biological's dated [DATE] revealed the facility should ensure medications and biological's are stored in an orderly manner in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a follow-up appointment was made for a resident who had a tooth that was broke off at the gum line. This affected one (#29) of four residents reviewed for dental services during the annual survey. The census was 46. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 11/04/18. Medical diagnoses included a stroke, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was cognitively intact. She was independent for eating, toileting, bed mobility and she required a Hoyer lift for transfers. She was always incontinent for bowel and bladder. Review of the resident's dental appointment dated 09/09/24 revealed the dentist tried to extract her tooth and the root was under the gum line and it wouldn't come out. He spoke to Social Services Designee (SSD) and Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident interview, family member interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a pest free environment. This affected one (#11) of 46 resident rooms observed for pest. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Record review of Resident #11 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #11 include cerebral infarction, muscle weakness, dysphagia, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for dressing and transfers. Observation on 06/02/25 at 10:05 A.M., revealed the Resident #11 in room B 23. On 06/03/25, Resident #11 was moved into room B 21. Observation on 06/03/25 at 8:30 A.M. revealed 10 to 20 quarter length black insects with wings on the floor in Resident #11 previous room, room B23. There were no insects observed in the B 23 room on 06/02/25. Interview on 06/03/25 at 8:30 A.M., Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-02 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews with staff and the resident's emergency contact, and policy review, the facility failed to implement an effectivprovide a resident and/or emergency contact training on a mechanical lift and meal arrangements for a safe discharge. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Closed record review for Resident #1 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including a fractured heel, history of pulmonary embolism, diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, and heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had intact cognition, was dependent on two staff for Hoyer lift transfers and did not ambulate. Resident #1 was his own person with an apartment in the community. His former wife was listed as his only emergency contact. Review of the physician orders dated 08/29/23 revealed an order for Resident #1 to discharge from the facility with home health nursing services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of the facility's policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an interdisciplinary care conference was held and the resident's were invited to attend. This affected one (Resident #42) of one resident reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 07/18/18. Diagnoses included joint pain, epilepsy, cognitive impairment, and non-compliance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was cognitively intact and was independent with mobility and required only minimal assistance from staff with personal hygiene. Review of the forms titled Interdisciplinary Care Conference Summary, dated 10/19/21, 01/18/22, and 04/19/22, revealed only the social services designee was in attendance. No clinical or other staff attended the meeting. The Interdisciplinary Care Conference Summary form, dated 07/21/22, revealed only the social services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, review of the facility's policy, and record review, the facility failed to timely provide a spend-down notification to a resident or representative and assist the resident in spending their balance before returning it to the State of Ohio. This affected one (Resident #22) of one resident reviewed for spend-down notifications. The facility census was 46. Finding include Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 03/07/14. Diagnoses included non-psychotic mental disorder and cognitive communication difficulty. Review of the spend-down notification dated 01/04/22 revealed Resident #22's balance was within $200 of the Medicaid limit or higher. This notification was to inform Resident #22 of the balance amount and provide information to reach out to the social worker within seven days to work out a plan to spend the balance. There was no evidence Resident #22 or representative were provided a spend-down notification in the year of 2021. Review of Resident #22's account statement dated 01/04/22 revealed a balance of $4,322.98. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of the facility's policy, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was created related to resident's oxygen use and behaviors. This affected one (Resident #11) of one resident reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 46. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 06/21/22. Diagnoses included hypertension, edema, heart disease, and heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 was cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #11's care plan dated 07/17/22 revealed there was no mention of Resident #11 being on oxygen nor any mention of Resident #11's behaviors of pulling her oxygen out of her nose. Review of the physician orders dated 08/08/22 revealed an order for oxygen at two liters per nasal cannula for shortness of breath (SOB) and to keep oxygen saturations over 92 percent. The physician order dated 10/08/22 revealed an order for two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to timely implement a wound treatment for a resident's new pressure ulcer. This affected one (Resident #15) of three residents reviewed for pressure wounds. The facility identified two current residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 08/15/16. Diagnoses included functional quadriplegia, flaccid neuropathic bladder, obstructive and reflux uropathy, chronic pain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sepsis, cutaneous abscess of back, open wound of lower back and pelvis, depression, pressure ulcer of right buttocks stage four (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed), and multiple sclerosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was cognitively intact. Resident #15 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff placed a splint device on a resident according to the therapy recommendations and physician order. This affected one (Resident #30) of one resident reviewed for positioning and mobility. The facility identified two residents with a physician-ordered splint device. The facility census was 46. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 11/21/19. Diagnoses included stiffness of the joint, lack of coordination, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting her right side. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact. Resident #30 had an upper extremity impairment to the one side. Resident #30 did not have refusal of care during the assessment reference days. Review of the care plan dated 04/14/22 revealed Resident #30 had a right hand splint for a contracture management with staff to don (apply) the splint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the facility policy, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure smokeless tobacco products were secured. This affected one (Resident #23) of one resident reviewed for smoking. The facility identified one resident who wandered and had cognitive impairment. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 12/18/18. Diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, paraplegia, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact. Resident #23 required extensive assist of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. Resident #23 required total dependence of one for bathing, dressing, and toileting. Review of the care plan dated 07/16/22 revealed Resident #23 was a supervised smoker. The goals included the resident would maintain a safe smoking environment as evidence by not smoking violations through the next…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to timely act on pharmacy recommendations for three (#2, #10, and #14) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease and gastrointestinal symptoms. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had severe cognitive impairment and delusions. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 06/14/22 revealed Resident #2 received a Omeprazole 20 milligrams (mg) (proton pump inhibitor) in addition to another gastro protective therapy Cimetidine 200 mg once a day. The pharmacist recommended to discontinue Cimetidine. The physician declined recommendation and wrote the Cimetidine was for sexual behavior, The physician note on the pharmacy recommendation was dated 06/22/22. Review of the pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) or provide a rationale for not attempting a GDR for a resident receiving an antidepressant. This affected one (Resident #14) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 04/01/20. Diagnoses included depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact. Review of the physician order dated 06/30/21 to 07/21/22 revealed an order for Sertraline (antidepressant) 25 mg to be administered once daily. A second physician order dated 06/30/21 to 07/21/22 revealed an order for 50 mg Sertraline to be administered once daily. Further review of Resident #14's medical record revealed there was no evidence the physician attempted a GDR for Sertraline or an explanation of why the GDR was not attempted for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility's infection policies and infection control log, the facility failed to identify and implement interventions to correct a concern with urinary tract infections as well as complete infection surveillance for August 2019. This affected 11 Residents (#14, #18, #27, #35, #39, #40, #41, #46, #98, #99, and #147) of 11 reviewed for infections. In addition the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during wound care. This affected one (Resident #24) of one resident reviewed for wound care. The facility also failed to ensure proper food handling, related to hand hygiene, before touching residents food. This directly affected one (Resident #13) of one resident observed during a lunch observation. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review Resident #13's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension, repeated falls, age…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, review of Resident Council Meeting records, review of the activity calendar, and review of facility policies; the facility failed to act promptly, respond to, and provide a rationale to Resident Council concerns in the areas of activities and appointment reminders. This affected two Resident's (#15 and #37) of three residents reviewed for Resident Council concerns. The census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and was independent with her activities of daily living (ADL). Review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 03/12/19 revealed the council was concerned there were no activities because staff were pulled to work the floor. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-06 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical records and staff interviews the facility failed to complete pain interviews on the Minimum Data Set (MDS). This affected two Resident's (#24 and #40) of 14 residents reviewed for comprehensive MDS assessments. The census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included severe protein calorie malnutrition, type two diabetes, and a pressure ulcer of sacral region (stage four). Review of Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact. Section J of the MDS revealed the pain interview should be conducted. Resident #24 received as needed and scheduled pain medication. The resident interview for pain was not assessed. 2. Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility 01/19/16. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, chronic kidney disease (stage three), and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #40's MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-06 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical records, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to screen a resident for serious mental illness and developmental disability. This affected one (Resident #24) of three residents reviewed for appropriate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) completion. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed he admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included severe protein calorie malnutrition, type two diabetes, and a pressure ulcer of sacral region (stage four). Review of Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #24's Hospital Exemption Form (7000 Form) dated 07/31/19 revealed the resident could reside in the facility for at least 30 days, pending a PASRR. Further review of Resident #24's medical record lacked evidence a PASRR had been completed. Interview on 11/04/19 at 1:02 P.M. with Social Service Designee (SSD) #136…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-06 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical records, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority and the intellectual disability authority after a significant change and a psychiatric hospitalization for residents who had mental illness and/or intellectual disability. This affected two Resident's (#36 and #37) of three residents reviewed for appropriate Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) completion. The facility identified one resident who had a developmental disability and 20 residents with a documented psychiatric diagnoses. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: epilepsy, insomnia, mild cognitive impairment, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms. Review of Resident #36's Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed she was moderately cognitively impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical record, observation, resident and staff interview, review of activity records and review of facility's activity policy, the facility failed to provide activities as scheduled to meet the activity preferences and needs of residents. This affected two Resident's (#21 and #36) of two residents reviewed for activities. The census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: epilepsy, insomnia, mild cognitive impairment, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms. Review of Resident #36's MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a moderate cognitive impairment and it was somewhat important to do things with groups of people and to do her favorite activities. Review of Resident #36's care plan, last revised 08/03/18, revealed she enjoyed board games, cards, and talking with others. The care plan indicated her personal preferences would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, interview with facility staff, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication with the dialysis center and failed to assess residents post dialysis. This affected one (Resident #40) of one resident reviewed for appropriate dialysis care. The facility identified Resident #40 was the only resident receiving dialysis services. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility 01/19/16. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, chronic kidney disease (stage three), and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #40's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. She required extensive assistance from staff with all activities of daily living. Review of Resident #40's care plan last revised 10/29/19 revealed she received dialysis treatments three times a week and would receive treatments as scheduled with monitoring of disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure non pharmacological interventions were implemented before giving an as needed narcotic (Percocet). This affected one (Resident #40) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure, respiratory failure, kidney disease (stage 3), schizophrenia, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was listed as totally dependent for transfers and toileting. Review of the care plan dated 06/05/19 revealed the resident used psychotropic medications daily related to diagnosis of anxiety disorder and depression. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated for 10/2019 and 11/2019 revealed Resident #40 was administered Percocet (for pain) nine times (10/02/19, 10/03/19,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2022-10-13 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's fund accounts were provided a monthly interest. This affected three (Residents #26, #38, and #42) of six residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 46. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 03/13/17. Diagnoses included anxiety and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #26's fund statements revealed Resident #26 did not receive interest in 06/2022 with a balance of $465.62, in 07/2022 with a balance of #225.62, in 08/2022 with a balance of $275.62, and in 09/2022 with a balance of $325.62. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 03/26/15. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease and contracture of right and left hand. Review of Resident #38's fund statements revealed Resident #38 did not receive interest in 03/2022 with a balance of $275.62 and in 07/2022 with a balance of $275.62. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 07/18/18. Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WWBV HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/30/2019 |
| DECANTED WILLIAM I. WEISBERG FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED SEPT 30, 2020 | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| SHH HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 03/01/2019 |
| WIW DYNASTY LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| HOHLEFELDER, JASON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/25/2024 |
| VOLPE, BENJAMIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2019 |
| WEISBERG, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2019 |
| NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2019 |
| SABER GOVERNANCE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| SHG MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| BLUMENSCHEIN, TONYA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/14/2021 |
| BNV DYNASTY LLC | Organization | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| BENJAMIN N. VOLPE FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED DECEMBER 29, 2020) | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2016 |
| SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2016 |
| URBANA RE GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2016 |
| SCOTT, MARY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $824K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365365. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.