No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Eagle Creek Nursing Center

141 Spruce Lane, West Union, OH 45693 · For profit - Corporation · 85 certified beds · (937) 544-5531 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 544-5531 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
11100 St Rt 41 · (937) 550-3657 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
11217 State Route 41 · (937) 544-7291 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
11132 State Route 41 · (937) 544-0118 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2581 Old Cincinnati Pike · (937) 544-7510 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
10895 State Route 41 · (937) 623-8890

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.9%5.3%15.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.4%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms37.0%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.0%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.9%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.6%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.3%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.7%75.6%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.321.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.041.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 6.8–18.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.14
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
26.2%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 72.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-19)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2022-08-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received mechanically altered diets as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#69) out of the five residents reviewed for nutrition during the annual and complaint survey. The facility census was 70. Findings include:Record review for Resident #69 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included cerebral infarct, muscle weakness, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/19/26, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident was assessed to receive a mechanically altered diet. Review of the care plan, last reviewed/revised on 06/23/26, revealed the resident had increased nutrition/hydration risk. Interventions included to provide diet as ordered. Review of the active physicians order, dated 04/15/26, revealed the resident was to receive a pureed texture diet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected two residents (#55 and #69) whose room was observed during the annual and complaint survey. The facility census was 70. Findings include:Observation on 06/22/26 at 8:15 A.M. revealed a strong urine odor was present in the room of Resident #55 and Resident #69 which could be smelled from the hallway. Observation on 06/22/26 at 12:03 P.M. revealed Resident #55 and Resident #69 were sitting in their room consuming their lunch meals. The urine odor continued to be present in the room. Housekeeper #401 entered the room to clean and mop. Observation on 06/22/26 at 4:15 P.M. revealed Resident #69 was lying in the bed. The sheets contained a rust-colored, circular stain on them located near the residents grab bar. Light brown stains were located on the sheets around where the residents feet were lying. Cobwebs and dust were present on the walls and ceiling between the residents sink and window, and debris was present…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to store foods and maintain kitchen equipment under sanitary conditions. This affected all 71 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 71. Findings include: During initial kitchen tour on 12/16/24 at 8:47 A.M., the was a large unlabeled and undated food bin containing a white substance under the food preparation counter. There was soy sauce, Worcestershire sauce, mayonnaise and opened bag of cheese with no expiration date or use by date in the walk-in refrigerator. Further observations of the stove ventilation revealed the hood had brown fuzzy debris of a quarter of inch in length hanging from the bottom rack. The debris was over the cooking surface of the stove, which contained open pans of cooking food. Interview on 12/016/24 at 8:50 A.M. the Dietary Manager, (DM) #280 verified there was no use by dates for open foods of soy sauce, Worcestershire sauce, mayonnaise and bag of cheese. DM #280 verified the stove hood was dirty and there was no evidence of stove hood cleaning provided. DM #280…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident on an anticoagulant. This affected one (#41) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Record review of Resident #41 revealed a most recent admission date of 10/30/24. Diagnoses include acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy status, hemiplegia, unspecified affecting left nondominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, convulsions, heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, long term use of antithrombotics/antiplatelets and abnormal uterine and vaginal bleeding 12/12/24. Review of the 11/04/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #41 is moderately cognitively impaired and was coded as taking an anticoagulant and an antiplatelets. Review of a physician order dated 10/31/24 revealed Resident #41 had an order for Eliquis (apixaban, an anticoagulant) five milligrams every 12 hours. Review of the medical record on 12/17/24 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of recipes, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide special dietary foods as ordered by the physician. This affected three (#14, #15 and #37) of five residents reviewed for special dietary foods. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #14 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dysphagia, weight loss history and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had impaired cognition and required assistance with eating. Further review of Resident #14's medical record revealed the resident had a diet order for fortified foods at each meal. 2. Record review of Resident #15 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include chronic obstruction pulmonary disease, nausea and history of weight loss. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had intact cognition and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of a memo from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when a resident with a chronic diabetic ulcer requiring wound treatments and dressing changes was not timely placed on enhance barrier precautions. This affected one (#60) of two reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Record review of Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 02/03/24. Diagnoses include type two diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer 02/03/24, viral hepatitis B, iron deficiency anemia, vitamin d deficiency, chronic pain syndrome, pleural effusion, fibromyalgia, cirrhosis of the liver, major depressive disorder, encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, nausea, and altered mental status. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store foods, discard expired foods and maintain food equipment in sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect 54 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Observation on 08/22/22 at 9:37 A.M. revealed following sanitation violations in the main kitchen: 1. Two open orange juice containers in reach-in refrigerator with no open date. 2. One thickened water container in reach-in refrigerator with no open date. 3. Two cranberry juice containers in reach-in refrigerator with no open date. 4. One unlabeled and undated container of a white substance on storage shelf. 5. One bag of opened and unsealed shredded cheese in walk in refrigerator. 6. A tray of 12 individual bowls of cereal unlabeled and undated in the dry storage area. 7. One box of opened cream of wheat cereal with expired date of 03/01/22. In the dining area, the ice machine had ice scoops stored in containers that did not permit drainage. The containers were on top of the ice machine and the ice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation ,interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain food equipment in good repair. This had the potential to affect 54 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Observation on 08/22/22 at 9:37 A.M. revealed the walk-in freezer had six inches by 24 inch area of ice buildup under the condenser at the back of the freezer. There was noted ice particles on top of and below food boxes stored below the condenser. Interview on 08/22/22 at 9:37 A.M. the Diet Manger, (DM) #181 verified the walk-in freezer had ice built up under the condenser and had not been working properly for several months. The DM #181 verified there was ice above and below boxes of frozen foods which did not permit proper air circulation. Interview on 08/25/22 at 9:00 A.M. with Maintenance Director, (MD) # 186 verified the walk-in freezer had ice built up under the condenser, had been occurring for a month and had not been removed or repaired. He verified a freezer condenser would not normally have an ice buildup. He verified the ice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately assess a resident status and submit the discharge assessment when the resident was discharged to the hospital. This affected one (Resident #1) of one reviewed for resident assessment. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 11/20/21. The resident had pertinent diagnoses of: unspecified symptoms involving nervous system, hyperlipidemia, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, slurred speech, emphysema, dementia with behavioral disturbance, malaise, repeated falls, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, protein-calorie malnutrition, dyspnea, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, insomnia, and Parkinson's disease. Review of the 02/27/22 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance for bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to timely implement a behavioral care plan. This affected one resident (#7) out of the three residents reviewed for mood and behavior. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Record review for Resident #7 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, anxiety disorder, sexual dysfunction, hypertension, and epileptic seizures. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/28/22, revealed this resident had exhibited physical and verbal behaviors directed at others one to three days during the lookback period. Review of the progress note, dated 06/28/22, revealed this resident had been aggressive with another resident and was seen hitting the other resident with her cane. The resident was placed on 15 minute checks and was to be sent to another facility for behavioral management and medication review. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely revise fall care plan interventions. This affected one resident (#35) out of the three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Record review for Resident #35 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, chronic gout, depression, anxiety, and history of falls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/12/22, revealed this resident had moderately impaired cognition and was assessed to require supervision for bed mobility and extensive assistance from one staff member for transfers and toileting. Review of the care plan, dated 11/02/18, revealed this resident was at risk for falls. Interventions included non-skid strips in front of chair, non-skid strips to floor beside bed, and reminder sign to ask for assistance with transfers and ambulation. Observation on 08/24/22 at 4:05 P.M. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ordered medications was available and administered as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#36) out of the four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Record review for Resident #36 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including heart failure, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/12/22, revealed this resident had mildly impaired cognition and was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, limited assistance from one staff member for transfers, and extensive assistance from one staff member for toileting. Review of the physicians order, dated 10/20/21, revealed an order to administer one capsule of Aspirin 162.5 milligram 24 hour Extended Release medication every day.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control techniques were maintained while providing care in an isolation room and in the facility laundry room. This affected one (#14) randomly observed resident receiving care by staff who was in isolation precautions and also had the potential to affect all 88 residents whose laundry was completed at the facility. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, depression, hypertension, diabetes mellitus Type II, cerebral infarction, mild cognitive impairment and pseudobulbar affect. Review of the physician orders for Resident #14 included an order on 08/24/19 for contact isolation due to infection (Pseudomonas and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)) in a heel wound which continued to be current on the 10/2019 physician monthly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-10-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of a dryer cleaning schedule and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the dryer was properly cleaned. This had the potential to affect all 88 residents residing at the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and odor free environment. This had the potential to affect all 14 residents (#8, #13, #18, #20, #31, #33, #41, #43, #45, #77, #80, #81, #85, and #342) residing on the 400 unit. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. During tour of the laundry area on 10/24/19 at 2:32 P.M. with Maintenance Supervisor #75 and Medical Records Staff #58 a build up of lint was noted in two of the three dryers in the laundry room. The dryers were empty. Review of the dryer cleaning schedule indicated the dryers had been free of lint at 1:00 P.M. The scheduled also indicated no laundry personal worked in the facility from 1:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M. Maintenance Supervisor #75 and Medical Records Staff #58 confirmed the dryers were empty of any articles, the cleaning sheet indicated there was no lint at 1:00 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician visit notes were accessible in the resident's medical record. This affected seven (#21, #78, #54, #12, #13, #77 and #25) of 18 residents reviewed for complete and accessible medical records. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; difficulty in walking, hypertension, transient cerebral ischemic attack, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified psychosis, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #21's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #21 also required supervision with eating on the 07/20/19 MDS. Review of Resident #21's chart on 10/23/19 revealed no physician visits noted in the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain residents dignity with toileting. This affected one (#20) out of 21 residents reviewed for privacy and dignity. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 05/20/16 with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, history of falling, hypertension, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed cognitive status was not assessed, she received extensive assistance for toileting and hygiene needs and was frequently incontinent of bladder. Review of social service note dated 10/18/19 revealed Resident #20 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of physician orders dated October 2019 revealed Resident #20 is to use the bedside commode. Review of care plan revealed Resident #20 had an activity of daily living performance deficit related to limited mobility and required assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of the Ohio Revised Code and policy review, the facility failed to maintain proper documentation of residents advanced directive wishes for their code statuses on valid forms. This affected two (#63 and #89) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The resident census was 88. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #89's chart revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; schizophrenia, insomnia, hypocalcemia, dementia with behavioral disturbance, muscle weakness, dissociative conversion disorder, epilepsy anemia, other nail disorder and dysphagia. Review of Resident #89's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident to be severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #89 also required supervision with eating on the 09/30/19 MDS. Review of Resident #89's electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician and family when a resident had a fall. This affected one resident (Resident #79) of three residents reviewed for falls. Facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of Resident #79's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoporosis with history of pathological fracture, anxiety, depression, emphysema, history of cerebral infarction, and endometrium cancer. Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed two sons were identified to be contacted in case of emergency. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set completed on 10/01/19 indicated no cognitive delay. Resident #79 was identified as requiring supervision with all activities of daily living. Review of the fall risk evaluation completed on 07/22/19 indicated Resident #79 was a low fall risk, had no falls during the past 90 days, no cognitive status change, adequate vision,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received written bed hold notifications within 24 hours of their discharges from the facility. This affected two (#21 and #56) of two residents reviewed for discharge notification. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; difficulty in walking, hypertension, transient cerebral ischemic attack, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified psychosis, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #21's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #21 also required supervision with eating on the 07/20/19 MDS. Review of Resident #21's chart revealed resident was discharged to the psychiatric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident that remained in the facility had a pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) prior to admission to the facility. This affected one (#54) of one resident reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, other dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypothyroidism, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness and unsteadiness on feet. Review of Resident #54's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene, toileting and dressing. Resident #54 also required supervision with bed mobility, transfers and eating on the 09/05/19 MDS. Review of Resident #54's chart revealed the resident did not have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, hypertension, anxiety, Alzheimer's disease, unspecified psychosis (07/31/19), and artificial right hip joint. Review of the quarterly MDS completed on 08/08/19 indicated Resident #35 had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance of two staff for activities of daily living. The staff assessment of Resident #35 mood revealed depressed, trouble falling asleep, feeling tired, appetite concerns. Resident #35 had indicators for psychosis including delusions and no behaviors were identified. A review of the physician orders indicated Resident #35 was currently receiving Meloxicam 7.5 milligrams (mg) daily for inflammation, Levothyroxine Sodium 25 micrograms (mcg) daily for hypothyroidism, Tramadol 50 mg two times daily for pain and Tylenol 325 mg two tablets ever four hours as needed for pain. The physician orders indicated Lovenox (an anticoagulant) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care to a resident. This affected one (#20) out of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 05/20/16 with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, history of falling, hypertension, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed cognitive status was not assessed, she received extensive assistance for toileting and hygiene needs and was frequently incontinent of bladder. Review of social service note dated 10/18/19 revealed Resident #20 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of physician orders dated October 2019 revealed Resident #20 is to use the bedside commode. Review of care plan revealed Resident #20 had an activity of daily living performance deficit related to limited mobility and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff and resident interview , the facility failed to conduct an accurate skin assessment of a resident's skin tear. This affected on (#79) of 18 residents reviewed. Facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of Resident #79's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoporosis with history of pathological fracture, anxiety, depression, emphysema, history of cerebral infarction, and endometrium cancer. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set completed on 10/01/19 indicated no cognitive delay. Resident #79 was identified as requiring supervision with all activities of daily living. A nursing progress noted dated 10/16/19 at 5:15 A.M. indicated Resident #79 slid off the side of the bed onto the floor which resulted in a skin tear to right arm. A post fall nursing progress note on 10/16/19 at 5:15 PM. indicated the resident's skin tone was normal, skin warm and dry. Dressing was dry and intact. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate care and services to prevent a further decline in the resident's contractures. This affected one (#78) of two residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; Huntington disease, restlessness and agitation, flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, dysphagia, muscle weakness, contracture of right knee, contracture of left knee, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #78's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be severely cognitively impaired and required total dependence with bed mobility, eating, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #78's occupational therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician had review the monthly pharmacist drug regimen review and any concerns were addressed in a timely manner. This affected two (#15 and #25) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, heart failure, malaise, major depression and malignant neoplasm of esophagus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on 10/04/19 indicated Resident #15 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #15 required one person limited assistance with mobility, one person extensive assistance with dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene. No indications for psychosis were identified. Antipsychotics were used on a daily basis and no gradual dose reduction (GDR) was done since the past review. Review of the physician orders revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of medication information from Medscape, the facility failed to ensure residents drug regimen were free from unnecessary medications when Resident #25 was prescribed Ranexa (a drug used to treat angina, chest pain) without an accurate diagnosis. This affected one (#25) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Record review of Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 04/18/16 with pertinent diagnosis of: anxiety disorder, heart failure, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, abdominal hernia, arthropathy, diverticulitis of intestine, muscle weakness, psychosis, dementia with behavioral disturbance, visual hallucinations, malaise, dysphagia, asthma, age related osteoporosis, major depressive do, dry eye syndrome, blindness in one eye, hearing loss, difficulty in walking, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the 07/23/19 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #25 is never or rarely understood and requires…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medication when the staff failed to implement a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for an antipsychotic medication as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#15) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, heart failure, malaise, major depression and malignant neoplasm of esophagus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set completed on 10/04/19 indicated Resident #15 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #15 required one person limited assistance with mobility, one person extensive assistance with dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene. No indications for psychosis were identified. Antipsychotics were used on a daily basis and no GDR had occurred since the past review. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review the facility failed to obtain labwork and urinalysis per physician orders. This affected two (#13 and #25) out of seven residents reviewed for labs. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 04/13/18 with diagnoses including but not limited to end stage renal dialysis, urinary tract infection, retention of urine, and panic disorder. Review of quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had no cognitive deficits, had presence of indwelling Foley catheter, and received dialysis treatment. Review of physician telephone order dated 07/03/19 revealed order to obtain urinalysis due to blood in urine. Review of the medical record was silent that any urinalysis was obtained as ordered on 07/03/19. Review of care plan revealed Resident #13 had urinary retention, presence of catheter, history of urinary tract infections…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure dental services were offered to residents. This affected one (#3) of one residents reviewed for dental concerns. Facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, asthma, seizures, hypertension, colostomy status, anxiety, history of wound to buttock and developmental disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated no cognitive delay and required one person extensive physical assistance for person hygiene including brushing teeth. The annual MDS dated [DATE] indicated no dental concerns. Review of State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) documentation for 09/2019 and 10/2019 indicated Resident #3 was extensive assistance of one person for oral hygiene which was provided two times daily. Review of the physician orders for Resident #3 indicated services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-08-25 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate daily staffing postings were displayed. This affected all 54 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 08/22/22 at 10:30 A.M. revealed the daily staffing postings were displayed in a box located by the nursing station. The postings contained the date and resident census number, but did not contain any information regarding the nursing hours present in the facility. The postings were dated 08/11/22, 08/12/22, 08/13/22, 08/17/22, 08/18/22, and 08/22/22. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #184 on 08/22/22 at 10:35 A.M. revealed the night shift nursing staff were to fill out the daily staffing postings and place them in box hanging on the wall by the nurses station. LPN #184 verified the postings hanging in the box on the wall by the nurses station contained the dates and resident census number, but did not contain the nurse staffing hours they were supposed to.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.9+2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.6+1.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Bryn Mawr Extended Care CenterBryn Mawr, PA 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, PA 1 of 5Gastonia Health & Rehab CenterGastonia, NC 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab CenterJohnstown, PA 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazleton, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5University Manor Health & RehaCleveland, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Health & Rehab CenterMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MadisonMadison, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MechanicsvilleMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
OHIO PENNSYSLVANIA PROPERTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2019
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2019
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2019
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2019
BOWER, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/23/2025
HOUSER, BRENDANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/19/2024
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2006
SHG BOA LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2026
SHG MT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2026
STILTNER, SEANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$712K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 3%Other / private 31%

This home reported $712K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$301per resident / day
operating cost
$9,165per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$248per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365586. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next