Wilmington Nursing & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 61.2 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-06-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered with a medication error rate less then 5%. This affected three (#28, #41, and #62) residents observed during medication administration. A total of 29 medication opportunities with three errors were observed for total error rate of 10%. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical records for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 01/03/25. Diagnoses included dementia, peripheral vascular disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of physician orders dated 02/18/26 revealed Resident #28 had an order memantine 5 milligrams (mg) two tablets twice a day. Observation on 06/10/26 from 7:20 A.M. through 7:26 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #274 revealed she administered medications to Resident #28. Medications administered included aspirin 81 mg one tablet, furosemide 20 mg one tablet, memantine 10 mg two tablets, and tamsulosin hydrochloride (HCL) 0.4 micrograms (mcg) one tablet. Interview on 06/10/26 at 10:10 A.M. RN #274 verified she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and review of facilty policy, the facility failed to provide proper incontinence care to one (#48) out of one residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 63.Findings include: Record review for Resident #48 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, and radiculopathy lumbar region. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. This resident was assessed to require to be dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident is assessed to always be incontinent of bowel and bladder.Observation on 06/10/26 at 9:23 A.M revealed CNA #260 put on a gown and applied gloves. She then put clean washcloths in Resident #48's sink and turned the water on. CNA #260 sat the washcloths on the bedside table on top of a new garbage bag. CNA #260 removed Resident #48's covers and clothes with the same gloves and started…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely pain management for one (#85) out of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 63. Findings include:Review of medical records for Resident #85 revealed an admission date of 06/08/26 at 11:30 P.M. Diagnoses included complete traumatic amputation hip and knee, peripheral vascular disease, type two diabetes, and abdominal hernia without obstruction or gangrene. Review of the physician orders dated 06/09/26 revealed Resident #85 had an order for Tylenol 325 milligram (mg) two tablets every six hours routine. Times to be administered were 12:00 A.M., 6:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., and 6:00 P.M. Also, Resident #85 had an order for oxycodone/acetaminophen 10-325 mg take one tablet as needed every six hours. Review of the medication administration record dated 06/09/26 revealed that Resident #85 had not been administered Tylenol 325 mg two tablets at 12:00 P.M. Review of Resident #85's vital sign form revealed on 06/09/26 at 2:16 P.M. the resident's pain was assessed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to be free from significant medication errors for one (#62) resident observed for medication administration. The facility failed to administer medications per physician order for one (#85) out of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of medical records for Resident #85 revealed an admission date of 06/08/26 at 11:30 P.M. Diagnoses included complete traumatic amputation hip and knee, peripheral vascular disease, type two diabetes, and abdominal hernia without obstruction or gangrene. Review of the physician orders dated 06/09/26 revealed Resident #85 had an order for Tylenol 325 milligram (mg) two tablets every six hours routine. Times to be administered were 12:00 A.M., 6:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., and 6:00 P.M. Review of the medication administration record dated 06/09/26 revealed that Resident #85 had not been administered Tylenol 325 mg two tablets at 12:00 P.M.Interview on 06/09/26 at 2:20 P.M. Resident #85 stated she had alot of pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served warm and palatable. This had the potential to affect all but one Resident (#32) who received food from the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the lunch menu for 12/26/24 revealed the residents received a choice of fish patty or chicken fingers, broccoli casserole, dinner roll and Jello for dessert. Observation of meal line service on 12/26/24 from 11:00 A.M. to 12:30 P.M., revealed the lunch meal consisted of a choice of a fish patty or chicken fingers, broccoli casserole and Jello for dessert. Cooking temperatures obtained at this time by using a facility thermometer revealed the fish patty was at 180 degrees Fahrenheit, chicken fingers at 190 degrees Fahrenheit and broccoli casserole at 182 degrees Fahrenheit. Steam table holding temperatures obtained by using a facility thermometer, at the time of plating, revealed the fish patty was at 202 degrees Fahrenheit, chicken fingers at 205 degrees Fahrenheit and broccoli…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete quarterly care conferences for residents residing in the facility. This affected four (#18, #21, #29, and #52) of five residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 09/04/19. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), convulsions, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the medical record for care conferences for the last 12 months revealed Resident #18 only had two care conferences dated 09/27/24 and 04/10/24. Interview on 07/09/24 at 2:40 P.M. with Social Services Designee (SSD) #145 verified Resident #18 had only received two care conferences in the last 12 months. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #21…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely foot care. This affected one (#18) of three residents reviewed to activities of daily living. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 09/04/19. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus (DM II), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), convulsions, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #18 was dependent on staff with bathing. Review of the podiatry note dated 10/27/23 revealed Resident #18 was seen and needed to follow up in two to three months. The podiatry note dated 01/12/24 revealed Resident #18 refused to be seen. The podiatry appointment dated 03/29/24 revealed Resident #18 was supposed to be seen but the podiatrist canceled. The podiatry…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (#39) of one resident reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 12/01/23. Diagnoses included acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of lower extremity and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #39's progress note dated 01/30/24 revealed an order was received to increase Warfarin (blood thinner) to six milligrams (mg) on Monday and Thursday, and continue five mg on Saturday, Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Friday. Review of Resident #39's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/30/24 to 02/15/24 for Warfarin five mg once a day with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation of the kitchen on 11/07/23 from 9:00 A.M. to 9:41 A.M. with Dietary Manager #100 revealed the following concerns: Observation of the four tray line warmers revealed the water under each bin the water was milk- like in color withfloating white particles. One of the bins had dried food on the sides of the bin. Observation of the shelves directly underneath the serving area revealed there food particles, a dirty scoop, a bottle of syrup, crumbled aluminum file and a plastic bin containing non-kitchen items. Observation of the plate warmer on the left side revealed the outside of the warmer was dirty with food particles, fingerprints, and an identified dry white substance near the top of the warmer. Observation of the outside of the microwave oven revealed the handle was covered with a dry crusty like substance, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure residents received a mechanical soft textured diet as ordered. This affected three (Residents #14, #30, and #32) of three residents with orders for a mechanical soft diet. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the facility menu for the lunch meal on 11/08/23 revealed the lunch entrée for that date was a turkey and cheese sandwich. Review of the dietary spreadsheet signed by the facility dietitian for the lunch entrée on 11/08/23 revealed residents with physician order for a mechanical soft diet should receive a scoop of ground turkey and two slices of bread. Observation of the lunch service line on 11/08/23 from 11:15 A. M. to 12:20 P. M. revealed the staff prepared a scoop of ground turkey as the entrée from Residents #14, #30, and #32, facility-identified residents with orders for mechanical soft diet. Residents #14, #30, and #32 did not receive bread with the meal as specified per the dietary spreadsheet. Interviews on 11/08/23 at 12:20 P.M. with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH