Avamere Rehabilitation Of Coos Bay
2625 Koos Bay Blvd, Coos Bay, OR 97420 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 92 certified beds · (541) 267-2161 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,593 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-22)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.8% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.5% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.4% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.7% | 4.9% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 2.4% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.8% | 20.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.7% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 5.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.3% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.8% | 13.9% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.5% | 81.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.5% | 21.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 21.7% | 16.1% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.08 | 1.48 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.69 | 2.35 | 1.80 | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 160 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.5%CMS range 54.8–68.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.2%CMS range 5.6–11.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 4.4–11.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 55.0 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.17 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.82 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure Staff 3 (RN) and Staff 4 (LPN) adhered to professional standards of practice related to the provision of CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) on a resident found with no heartbeat and not breathing for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for Death/CPR. This failure, determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation, resulted from the failure to initiate CPR for the resident according to physician's orders. This failure prevented the possible resuscitation and continued life of Resident 1. Findings include: OAR 8510450040 Scope of Practice Standards for All Licensed Nurses indicated the following: (1) Standards related to the licensed nurse's responsibilities for client advocacy. The licensed nurse: (b) Intervenes on behalf of the client to identify changes in health status, to protect, promote and optimize health, and to alleviate suffering. OAR 8510450050 Scope of Practice Standards for Licensed Practical Nurses indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-22 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to perform CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) on a resident found with no heartbeat and not breathing for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for Death/CPR. This failure, determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation, resulted from the facility failing to initiate CPR for Resident 1 according to physician's orders. This failure prevented the possible resuscitation and continued life of Resident 1. Without immediate action to correct the failure the 19 other full code residents at the facility were at risk for not being resuscitated. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes and late onset Alzheimer's disease. Resident 1's care plan dated [DATE] included Advance Directives Full Code (CPR) and the resident's POLST (Portable Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) was on file with the facility. Resident 1's POLST dated [DATE] indicated the resident's code status was Full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-08-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to have an on-hand supply of emergency hypoglycemic medication and administer anti-seizure medications according to provider orders for 2 of 13 residents (#s 5, and 30) reviewed for insulin and medication errors. This placed residents at risk for serious adverse health outcomes and death. Findings include: 1. Resident 5 admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with diagnoses including end stage kidney disease and Type I diabetes. The facility’s 2024 Standing Physician Orders for diabetic management instructed staff to inject 1 gram glucagon when diabetic residents became unresponsive, or capillary blood glucose (CBG) was below 70 mg/dL. The 4/2025 Diabetic Administration Record (DAR) did not include standing orders for glucagon injections. The 4/30/25 admission MDS revealed Resident 5 had a BIMS of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A 6/5/25 Summary for Providers Note revealed Resident 5 had a change in mental status, was unresponsive, and was difficult to arouse. Resident 5’s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 4 of 15 sampled residents (#s 3, 5, 21, and 59) reviewed for medications, insulin, medication administration, and tube feedings. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication effects. Findings include:1. Resident 3 was re-admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with a diagnosis of heart failure. Resident 3's 6/19/25 clinic physician summary indicated she/he was on a fluid restriction and was seen for a follow-up visit from a recent hospitalization for heart failure. The clinic visit summary revealed a handwritten order which instructed staff to discontinue Resident 3's fluid restriction. If Resident 3 experienced a five pound or greater weight gain in 24 hours, increased swelling in her/his legs, or difficulty breathing with exertion, the fluid restriction was to be reinstated. Resident 3's 6/2025 MAR revealed her/his fluid restriction was discontinued on 6/19/25. Resident 3's 7/2025 and 8/2025 TAR revealed her/his weights were monitored daily unless…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure residents attained or maintained their highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being for 5 of 10 sampled residents (#s 1, 7, 24, 52, and 61) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include:1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with a diagnosis of UTI. Resident 1's 8/4/25 admission MDS revealed she/he had memory loss. On 8/18/25 at 11:53 AM Resident 1 stated, at times, it took approximately 30 minutes for staff to answer her/his call light, and it occurred on all shifts. Resident 1's Past Calls log from 8/14/25 through 8/17/25 revealed her/his call light was activated without a response for more than 30 minutes on 8/15/25 at 7:16 AM, 8/15/25 at 12:22 PM, and 8/16/25 at 7:19 AM. On 8/20/25 at 1:27 PM Staff 14 (CNA) stated Resident 1 often activated her/his call light and was not sure why she was not able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident medications were not expired for 1 of 1 medication storage room, 1 of 2 medication carts, and 1 of 1 treatment carts reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for lack of medication efficacy and adverse reactions from expired medications. Findings include:The facility Medication Labeling and Storage policy, with unknown publication date, stated multi dose vials were to be dated when opened and discarded within 28 days. During an observation of the medication storage room on 8/19/25 at 1:18 PM, the following were found: - Two bottles of Metamucil (a laxative medication) with an expiration date of 4/2025. On 8/19/25 at 1:34 PM, Staff 22 (LPN) stated the expectation for expired medication was for it to be destroyed and replaced. During an observation of the [NAME] Fir Drive medication cart on 8/19/2025 at 2:04 PM, the following was found: - One bottle of acid reducer 20mg (medication used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure an ice machine drain had an airgap to prevent back flow for 1 of 1 kitchen. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: On 8/20/25 at 11:04 AM and 8/20/25 at 11:20 AM with Staff 29 (Dietary Manager) the ice machine drainpipe was observed to be in a drain hole with no air gap. Staff 29 stated there was no flooding in the kitchen for years. On 8/21/25 at 12:31 PM Staff 30 (Maintenance) stated in 7/2025 the airgap was identified on a work order to be fixed but was not. On 8/25/25 at 10:33 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated he was not aware of the lack of airgap for the ice machine prior to survey.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident had correct sized incontinence products for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for skin breakdown. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with a diagnosis of diabetes. Resident 3's Care Plan initiated on 6/12/24 revealed she/he was incontinent of bowel and bladder and wore a three X brief for dignity. Resident 3's 6/18/25 Annual MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact. On 8/18/25 at 1:39 PM Resident 3 stated the facility often ran out of the incontinence briefs she/he wore, she/he had to wear a smaller size, and it was uncomfortable. On 8/20/25 at 1:19 PM Staff 15 (Central Supplies) stated he ordered residents' incontinence supplies. Resident 3 required a special order. He ordered two boxes every two weeks; however, the shipment did not always arrive because it was back ordered. Staff 15 stated the back order happened regularly. If Resident 3's size did not come in, staff had to use the smaller sized brief.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident's family of a hospitalization for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of family involvement. Findings include:Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with a diagnosis of diabetes. Resident 3's clinical record indicated Witness 1 (Family) was listed as her/his first emergency contact. Resident 3's 4/25/25 Progress Note revealed her/his oxygen saturation levels dropped multiple times, a rapid pulse, and five episodes of diarrhea. Despite interventions, Resident 3's oxygen level did not increase, and she/he was transferred to the hospital for evaluation. Resident 3's clinical record did not indicate Witness 1 was notified. Resident 3's 6/18/25 Annual MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact. On 8/21/25 at 3:05 PM Resident 3 stated she/he had family, including Witness 1, who should be contacted when she/he was hospitalized . On 8/25/25 at 8:38 AM Witness 1 stated she was to be notified when Resident 3 had a change in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to report a bruise of unknown origin for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#41) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include:Resident 41 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure and pain. A 6/14/25 physician order instructed staff to complete weekly skin checks on the resident's shower days and document on the Weekly Skin Audit. A 7/14/25 physician order instructed staff to administer apixaban 5 mg (anticoagulant) two times a day for blood clots. Resident 41's Annual MDS completed on 8/7/25 revealed a BIMS score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The 8/15/25 Alert Note indicated the nurse was notified Resident 41 had a long, dark bruise on the underside of her/his right breast. Resident 41 was unable to explain how the bruising occurred and did not complain of pain. No documentation was found to indicate staff notified the State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure therapy was ordered for a discharged resident for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#22) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely services after discharge. Findings include: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in 7/2022 with a diagnosis of a stroke. Resident 3's 7/31/25 Discharge Summary and Plan revealed she/he was discharged on 7/31/25 and a Home Health Agency referral was submitted. The expected start of care was 8/4/25. On 8/18/25 at 4:56 PM Witness 4 (Complainant) stated Resident 22 just received orders for therapy on 8/18/25. On 8/20/25 at 2:46 PM Staff 12 (Social Services) stated Resident 22's discharge was resident driven. The facility therapy department recommended two additional weeks of therapy, but Resident 22's family wanted her/him to discharge on [DATE]. Home Health physical therapy and occupational therapy orders were recommended but the orders were not signed before the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the state Long Term Care Ombudsman's office was notified of facility discharges for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 3, 22, and 56) reviewed for discharges and hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of advocacy. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with a diagnosis of diabetes. Resident 3's Progress Notes revealed she/he was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. A review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed the state long term care ombudsman (LTCO) was not notified of the resident's facility discharge. On [DATE] at 12:25 PM Staff 11 (Regional Director of Quality Assurance) verified there was no documentation the LTCO was notified of Resident 3's discharge. 2. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in 7/2022 with a diagnosis of a stroke. Resident 22's Discharge Summary and Plan of Care revealed she/he was discharged on [DATE]. Review of Resident 22's clinical record revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident's care plan was comprehensive for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#41) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for increased complications related to anticoagulant medication use. Findings include: Resident 41 admitted to the facility on 8/2024 with diagnoses including heart failure and pain. A 6/14/25 physician order instructed staff to complete weekly skin checks on the resident's shower days and document any skin irregularities on the Weekly Skin Audit. A 7/14/25 physician order instructed staff to administer apixaban 5 mg (anticoagulant) two times a day for blood clots. Resident 41's 8/7/25 Annual MDS revealed a BIMS score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The 8/15/25 Alert Note indicated the nurse was notified Resident 41 had a long, dark bruise on the underside of her/his right breast. Resident 41 was unable to explain how the bruising occurred and did not complain of pain. Resident 41's 8/21/25 care plan indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free from accident hazards for 1 of 9 sampled residents (#52) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include:Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with diagnoses including fracture of left leg, anxiety, and difficulty in walking. The care plan dated 7/12/25 identified Resident 52 as high risk for falls. Staff were instructed to keep her/his call light within reach at all times and DO NOT leave the resident unsupervised in the bathroom or on the bedside commode. A 7/16/25 admission MDS BIMS assessment indicated a score of 13 (cognitively intact). On 8/20/25 at 8:05 AM, the call light time log showed Resident 52 activated her/his call light at 7:45 AM. Staff 17 (LPN Charge Nurse) entered the room the room at 8:06 AM-21 minutes later. On 8/20/25 at 8:30 AM Staff 17 stated he entered Resident 52's room because the call light had been on for a while. At 8:36 AM Resident 52 stated she had been waiting on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received timely incontinence care for 2 of 10 residents (#6 and 15) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at increased risk for skin breakdown and loss of dignity. Findings include:1. Resident 6 was admitted in 7/2025 with diagnoses including kidney failure and muscle weakness. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified the resident as frequently incontinent of urine and she/he required assistance with toileting. Resident 6 was cognitively intact and did not have any behaviors of rejection of care. The 7/15/25 Urinary Incontinence CAA identified frequent incontinence and dependance on staff for safe completion of toileting hygiene and needs. Resident 6's care plan dated 7/23/25 directed staff to encourage the use of the call light for assistance, offer frequent toileting opportunities, provide frequent check and change throughout each shift, and perform peri care after each incontinent episode.A Documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#6) reviewed for medications and respiratory services. This placed residents at risk for unmet respiratory needs. Findings include:Resident 6 was admitted in 7/2025 with diagnoses including sleep apnea and edema (swelling caused by fluid retention).Per the facility's Oxygen Administration policy and procedure, documentation must include:-Date and time of oxygen setup or adjustment-Oxygen flow rate, route, and rationale-Frequency and duration of treatment-Reason for PRN administration-Assessment data before, during, and after the procedure-Resident's tolerance of the procedure The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident 6 was cognitively intact and exhibited no behaviors. Resident 6 was not on oxygen therapy.A physician order dated 8/7/25 instructed staff to administer oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal cannula PRN for shortness of breath. No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain medication was available for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for uncontrolled pain. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with a diagnosis of chronic pain. Resident 3's 6/18/25 Annual MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 3's 6/2025 MAR revealed on 6/12/25 she/he was administered one dose of oxycodone (narcotic pain medication). Resident 3's 4/2025 Order Summary Report revealed she/he was to be administered oxycodone every eight hours PRN for pain. Progress Notes revealed the following:6/12/25 follow up with Resident 3's clinic for an oxycodone refill. Staff were notified they were no longer able to use the emergency supply of oxycodone. 6/13/25 The pharmacy reported Resident 3's oxycodone was on hold pending clarification of which physician was allowed to prescribe refills. Resident 3's 8/2025 Orders Summary Report revealed she/he was to be administered oxycodone every eight hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's denture was replaced timely for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#3) reviewed for dental. This placed residents at risk for weight loss. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with a diagnosis of diabetes. Resident 3's ADL report revealed at times she/he required assistance with oral care. Resident 3's 1/14/15 Care Conference Information form revealed Resident 3 reported the facility lost her/his lower denture. Resident 3 stated she/he set the lower denture on the bedside table and did not place the denture in her/his denture cup. Resident 3 also stated at bedtime she/he requested a snack and at that time she/he could not find her/his lower denture. Resident 3 stated a CNA looked for the denture in the linens, laundry, and dietary department but the denture was not located. Resident 3's 7/9/25 Progress Note revealed Staff 1 (Administrator) notified Staff 12 the facility was to replace Resident 3's lost denture. On 8/20/25 at 8:01 AM Resident 3 stated in 1/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide clean and sanitary smoking equipment for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#21) reviewed for smoking. This placed residents at risk for respiratory issues and cross-contamination. Findings include: Resident 21 admitted to the facility in 6/2025 with diagnoses including nicotine dependency and visual loss. The 6/9/25 Smoking Safety Evaluation revealed Resident 21 was alert and oriented, had visual impairment, and required staff supervision while smoking, including the use of a smoking apron.The 8/6/25 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 21 had a BIMS of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact.On 8/18/2025 at 1:17 PM, Staff 20 (CMA) assisted Resident 21 to the supervised smoking area. Staff 20 and Staff 33 (CNA) stated no clean smoking aprons were available, as the only remaining apron was moldy. Staff 20 stated he would not want to put a moldy apron on himself, nor would he want to put it on any resident.On 8/18/2025 at 1:19 PM, Staff 33 was told by Staff 2 (DNS) they did not have any more smoking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to handle and prepare food in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitary practices. This placed residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings include: On 5/2/24 at 11:48 AM Staff 26 (Cook/Dietary Aide) was observed to cut a hamburger patty with gloved hands on the cutting board attached to the steam table. Staff 26 placed the hamburger patty on a plate. Staff 26 then grabbed a rag from the red bleach bucket and wiped the cutting board and knife. The cutting board was observed to still be wet when Staff 26 used the same gloved hands to grab a skinned baked potato and cut it on the wet cutting board with the same knife. On 5/2/24 at 11:50 AM when asked about the drying time after wiping a surface, Staff 26 stated she, had no idea. When asked when it was appropriate to change gloves, Staff 26 stated she changed gloves often and had a box of gloves next to her work surface. When asked why she did not change her gloves after using the rag from the bleach bucket and before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to process laundry to produce hygienically clean laundry and prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 1 laundry room reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for contaminated laundry. Findings include: According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Guidelines for Environmental Control in Healthcare Facilities (2003); Laundry and Bedding Section G.II.D, damp laundry was not to be left in machines overnight. On 5/1/24 at 1:17 PM Staff 22 (Housekeeping) stated her shift ended at 2:00 PM and she had the last shift of the day. Staff 22 stated when wet laundry was not completed in the washing machine at the end of her shift, she left the wet laundry in the washing machine overnight. Staff 22 stated the next morning she transferred the wet laundry to the dryer and did not rewash the laundry. On 5/2/24 at 8:52 AM Staff 23 (Housekeeping) stated her shift ended at 2:00 PM and she had the last shift of the day. Staff 23 stated multiple times a week she left wet laundry in the washing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper labeling of biologicals, and failed to ensure proper storage temperatures were logged and maintained for 2 of 2 treatment carts and 1 of 1 medication room reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for reduced efficacy of medication and adverse medication side effects. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 3:20 PM two vials of tuberculin (used for the testing in the diagnosis of Tuberculosis) were observed to be opened; one was dated October of an illegible year and another was dated [DATE]. The manufacturer's instructions indicated to discard the medication 30 days after opening. On [DATE] at 3:20 PM Staff 12 (LPN) acknowledged the two vials of tuberculin were opened and expired. 2. On [DATE] at 3:20 PM the medication refrigerator temperature logs were observed to be blank on [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE] through [DATE]. On [DATE] at 3:20 PM Staff 12 (LPN) acknowledged the temperature logs were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were cleaned for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#9) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for lack of a homelike environment. Findings include: Resident 9 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including respiratory failure and heart failure. Review of Resident Council notes for 2/2024 indicated residents reported a lot of dirt on the floors and the floors needed to be swept more. Observations made from 4/29/24 through 5/1/24 revealed a visible layer of white and gray dust and hairs underneath Resident 9's bed. Review of the Daily Cleaning Check-Off form indicated Resident 9's room was cleaned on 4/27/24. On 5/1/24 at 12:24 PM Staff 19 (Housekeeping Manager) stated housekeeping staff cleaned one of three resident halls per day. Staff 9 stated the daily cleaning of resident rooms consisted of cleaning the bathroom, taking out the trash, wiping down high touch areas, sweeping and mopping. Staff 19 stated it was brought to her attention that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from verbal abuse from Staff 24 (RN) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#20) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: The facility's Abuse policy, revised 4/2021, stated the facility and staff would protect residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of property by anyone including facility staff. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Resident 20's 2/7/24 Comprehensive MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 20's 2/26/24 Care Plan indicated the resident was independent with bathing and required set up help only. Resident 20 showered one time per week per the resident's request. Resident 20's 4/2024 shower logs revealed the resident frequently refused showers. A 3/31/24 Progress Note indicated Staff 24 (RN) approached Resident 20 in the morning about taking a shower. Resident 20 refused and stated she/he would take a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation by Staff 34 (CNA) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#302) reviewed for misappropriation of personal funds. This placed residents at risk for financial abuse. Findings include: The facility's revised 4/2021 Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program stated residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. Resident 302 admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis. The 4/2023 Comprehensive MDS identified Resident 302 to be alert and oriented. On 5/23/23 a Facility Reported Incident was reported indicating Resident 302 bought Staff 34 (CNA) a scrub top (nurse apparel shirt) purchased on-line for $34.00. Resident 302 stated she/he expected Staff 34 to pay her/him back. Staff 34 paid Resident 302 $20.00. On 5/2/24 at 9:13 AM and at 2:10 PM Staff 34 was unable to be reached via phone. On 5/2/24 at 9:53 AM Staff 5 (Social Services Director) observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents with contractures received ROM services and equipment to prevent further decrease in ROM and skin breakdown for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#4) reviewed for mobility. This placed residents at risk worsening contractures. Findings include: Resident 4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia and rheumatoid arthritis. The 2/4/24 admission ADL CAA indicated Resident 4 had impaired ROM and the Care Plan would refer to restorative and/or skilled therapy as appropriate. Resident 4's clinical record included a copy of a 11/29/21 Care Plan from Resident 4's previous facility. The Care Plan indicated Resident 4 had contractures to her/his bilateral hands and legs related to rheumatoid arthritis. Interventions included the use of palm protectors to be worn during the day. The 1/31/24 Care Plan revealed no indication of Resident 4's contractures or use of a palm device. Review of a 3/15/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess falls and provide treatment to prevent falls for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#25) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for falls and injuries. Findings include: Resident 25 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including weakness and heart failure. The 1/26/24 Annual MDS indicated Resident 25 was cognitively intact. On 4/29/24 at 1:31 PM Resident 25 stated she/he fell out of the sit-to-stand (a device used to transfer residents between seated to standing positions) several months ago. On 4/30/24 Resident 25's clinical record was reviewed. No fall assessments or incident reports were found. On 4/30/24 a fall assessment was requested from Staff 2 (DNS). On 4/30/24 at 10:31 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated Resident 25 did not have a fall from the sit-to-stand device, but was assisted to the floor by staff and stated, So it wasn't a fall. Staff 2 stated no assessment was completed. On 5/1/24 at 2:12 PM Staff 2 provided a written statement dated 5/1/24 from Staff 20 (CNA) that indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed ensure oxygen was administered as ordered and maintain oxygen concentrators for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 36 and 251) reviewed for oxygen therapy. This placed residents at risk for increased risk for respiratory failure. Findings include: 1. Resident 36 was admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (buildup of carbon dioxide in the bloodstream). The 1/15/24 Significant Change MDS indicated Resident 36 was moderately cognitively impaired. Multiple observations from 4/29/24 through 5/1/24 revealed Resident 36 used an oxygen concentrator. The external filter on the oxygen concentrator was observed to have a layer of dust when touched with a finger. Resident 36's physicians order dated 4/2/24 indicated: - clean external filter on the oxygen concentrator every Tuesday on night shift. The 4/2024 TAR indicated on 4/23/24 the external filter on the oxygen concentrator was cleaned by Staff 21 (LPN) who worked the night shift. On 4/29/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow pharmacist recommendations in a timely manner for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#30) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary medication administration. Findings include: Resident 30 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and psychosis. The 1/16/24 pharmacist recommendation indicated Resident 30 did not display psychotic behavior but had issues with depression, and to consider an order to increase nortriptyline (antidepressant) to 50 mg daily at bedtime for depression and to decrease aripiprazole (antipsychotic) to 2 mg daily for psychosis. The pharmacist recommendation was not signed by the physician until 2/4/24 (19 days after the recommendation was made). The physician recommendation included to discontinue nortriptyline and start Lexapro (antidepressant) 5 mg daily. On 5/1/24 at 2:12 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated the expectation was for pharmacist recommendations to be reviewed and signed by the physician within 7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a dialysis agreement in place for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#45) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for not receiving dialysis services. Findings include: Resident 45 admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with diagnoses including dependence on renal dialysis. On 4/30/24 a copy of the dialysis agreement was requested from Staff 4 (Corporate RN). On 4/30/24 at 1:52 PM Staff 4 stated the facility did not have a dialysis agreement in place for Resident 45.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately document medication administration for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#33) reviewed for physician orders. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate medical records. Findings include: Resident 33 admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including hypothyroidism (when the thyroid gland doesn't make enough thyroid hormones to meet your body's needs) and septic arthritis (an infection in the joint fluid and tissues). a. A physician order dated 4/1/24 instructed staff to administer one tablet of levothyroxine 50mcg (a thyroid medication) one time a day at 5:00 AM. A review of Resident 33's April 2024 MAR revealed the resident did not receive the scheduled dose on 4/26/24 at 5:00 AM. There were no progress notes in the resident's clinical record to indicate the reason for the missed dose. On 5/2/24 at 1:50 PM Staff 3 (RNCM) stated the documentation for 4/26/24 on the MAR was inaccurate. Staff 3 stated she contacted Staff 32 (LPN) on 5/2/24 and Staff 32 indicated Staff 32 administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were offered a pneumonia vaccine for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#30) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for infections. Findings include: The facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine Policy dated 3/2022 indicated, assessments of pneumococcal vaccination status are conducted within five working days of the resident's admission if not conducted prior to admission. Resident 30 admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including depression. A review of Resident 30's clinical record revealed she/he did not receive a pneumonia vaccine and there was no indication the resident was offered a pneumonia vaccine upon admission to the facility. On 5/2/24 at 1:30 PM Staff 18 (IP) stated upon admission a resident was to be offered vaccinations if eligible, including the pneumonia vaccine. Staff 18 confirmed Resident 30 was not offered the pneumonia vaccine upon admission.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure comfortable temperatures were maintained in all areas of the facility for 1 of 1 facility. This placed residents at risk for an uncomfortable environment. Findings include: 1. On 3/8/23 at 2:32 PM Witness 6 (Family Member) stated he complained for days about the dining room being too cold. Witness 6 stated one of the two heating vents in the dining room did not work and Resident 10 was not comfortable eating in the dining room. On 3/8/23 at 2:44 PM Staff 35 (Maintenance Director) was asked to measure environmental temperatures in the facility. Staff 35 stated he was aware the living room was cold due to the facility replacing the baseboard heater with two new wall heaters but the room needed more heaters. Staff 35 also stated he learned of the cold temperature in the dining room that day and was working on a repair. The following environmental temperatures were obtained: - Outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]: 66 degrees -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it as determined the facility failed to follow physician orders and ensure bowel care interventions were followed for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 6, 16 and 24) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs and bowel complications. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 2013 with diagnoses including dementia. A 2/6/23 Note to Attending Physician/Provider signed by Resident 6's physician on 2/8/23 revealed the facility was to complete labs to check the valporic acid level (blood test to check medication levels), CBC (complete blood count) and hepatic panel (liver functioning) in one week on 2/15/23. A review of the clinical records revealed the ordered labs were not completed. On 3/8/23 at 1:43 PM Staff 5 (RNCM) reviewed the Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber for labs and stated the ordered labs were not completed. 2. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including dementia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure equipment was properly sanitized for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. This placed resident at risk for food borne illnesses. During random observations on 3/6/23 and 3/10/23 in the common dining room, plastic pitchers were observed in use by CNAs who assisted residents by pouring their beverages of choice during meal service. On 3/6/23 from 10:15 AM to 11:30 AM the three compartment sink was observed not in use. On 3/9/23 at 10:30 AM Staff 23 (Dietary Aide) stated the three compartment sink was only used when the dishwasher was not working. Staff 23 was observed to touch a plastic pitcher held in an unused three compartment sanitation sink and stated the plastic pitchers could not be placed in the dish machine because the dish washer damaged the pitchers. Staff 23 stated the pitchers were cleaned just like at home with soapy water. On 3/9/23 at 12:13 PM Staff 6 (Dietary Manager) observed three plastic pitchers on the clean dish shelf and confirmed the three compartment sink was not used to sanitize the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 19 and 30) reviewed for call lights. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 19 admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that affects movement). On 3/7/23 at 9:54 AM Resident 19 stated her/his call light was not always placed where she/he could reach it. On 3/8/23 at 11:18 AM Resident 19 was lying in bed. The call light was on the recliner behind the head of the bed. Resident 19 stated she/he could not reach the call light. On 3/8/23 at 11:24 AM Staff 3 (LPN-RCM) confirmed Resident 19's call light was on the recliner and Resident 19 would not be able to reach the call light. Staff 3 stated staff were expected to keep call lights in resident's reach. On 3/9/23 at 10:47 AM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed call lights were expected to always be within residents' reach. 2. Resident 30 admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#47) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 47 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease which caused obstructed airflow). In a public complaint on 1/6/23 Witness 7 (Complainant) stated Resident 47 was admitted to the hospital and observed to have multiple bruises on her/his lower abdomen and groin area. A 12/13/22 admission Nursing Database revealed no documentation of bruising on Resident 47's lower abdomen and groin area. A 12/15/22 Progress Note revealed Resident 47 was found on the floor and obtained a small injury to her/his left forearm but no other injury. A 12/20/22 Progress Note revealed Resident 47 fell with no injuries. A 12/22/22 Weekly Skin Audit revealed Resident 47 had no new skin areas and did not identify bruising to the lower abdomen or groin area. A 1/2/23 Weekly Skin Audit revealed Resident 47…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess and complete a significant change assessment for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#13) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease. An admission assessment dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 15 (indicating cognitively intact), a depression score of one (no depression), she/he had no behaviors and occasional pain of one (scale of zero-10 with zero meaning no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable). A Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of nine (moderately impaired), a depression score of six (mild depression), rejection of care one to three days in a seven day period and almost constant pain of nine. On 3/8/23 at 4:07 PM Staff 5 (RNCM) stated Resident 13 had a decline in mood when her/his significant other was hospitalized . Staff 5 stated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise care plans and conduct quarterly care planning conferences for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 19, 23 and 24) reviewed for ADLs, constipation and care planning. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder affecting movement). A 9/20/22 progress note revealed Resident 19 had a care conference. At the time of the survey no documentation was found in clinical records indicating a care conference was held after 9/20/22. On 3/7/23 at 2:28 PM Staff 4 (Social Service Director) stated care conferences were completed quarterly based on the MDS schedule. Staff 4 confirmed Resident 9 was scheduled for a care conference in 12/2022 but was unable to find documentation to indicate the care conference was conducted. 2. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including stroke. An Annual MDS was completed in 8/2022. A review of Resident 23's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dialysis services were provided to 1 of 1 sampled resident (#16) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for lack of dialysis services. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease. a. An alert note dated 10/28/22 indicated Resident 13 had a central venous catheter (a tube inserted into a vein) in the chest and a new left arm fistula (a connection between an artery and a vein) for dialysis treatments. An admission Database dated 10/28/22 did not identify the presence of the central venous line or the fistula. The current care plan for dialysis services identified a dialysis access site in the left arm, restricted blood pressures and lab draws on the left arm, provided information related to monitoring for the fistula for bleeding and to obtain dry weights (weights obtained after the resident received dialysis). The 3/2023 MAR instructed staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to reassess, implement and revise behavioral healthcare needs for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#12) reviewed for mood/behavior health. This placed residents at risk for unmet psychosocial wellbeing. Findings include: Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including depression. A review of 3/1/22 through 7/24/22 progress notes revealed Resident 12 had no documented behaviors. A 5/3/22 Quarterly MDS revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact), no acute mental status change, a depression scale of 0 (no depression symptoms) and no behaviors. A 7/25/22 progress note revealed Resident 12 accused Staff 30 (RA) of hitting her/him. A 7/26/22 progress note stated Resident 12 was crying and stated Staff 30 did not hit her/him. A 7/28/22 progress noted revealed an investigation regarding an allegation of abuse was completed and abuse was ruled out. An 8/1/22 Comprehensive MDS revealed a BIMS score of 15, no acute mental status change, a depression score of 7 (mild depression) and one day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor psychotropic medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for medications. This place residents at risk for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident 24 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including chronic pain and anxiety disorder. The facility's 8/25/20 Psychoactive Medication Management Guideline indicated residents who received psychotropic medications would have a supporting diagnosis, targeted behavior for use and be monitored for effectiveness of the medication therapy. A 1/17/23 Psychoactive Medication Review progress note revealed Resident 24 was stable on current medications and the care plan was updated. A 2/9/23 signed physician order indicated as of 10/28/22 Resident 24 received trazodone (antidepressant medication) by mouth at bedtime for insomnia. Resident 24's clinical record revealed no sleep monitor or care plan related to the resident's sleep. On 3/8/23 at 11:35 AM Staff 10 (CNA) stated Resident 24 was not monitored for sleep and there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to promptly provide emergency dental services and interventions to meet residents' needs for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#9) reviewed for dental. This placed residents at risk for unmet dental needs. Findings include: Resident 9 admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including diabetes. A 6/2/22 Annual MDS Dental CAA revealed Resident 9 wore full lower dentures. A 7/5/22 Grievance Form revealed Resident 9's dentures were missing. A dental appointment was made for 10/20/22, the soonest date available. An 8/17/22 Physician Order revealed Resident 9's diet texture was changed to soft and bite size due to dental repair. A 9/2/23 Grievance Form revealed Resident 9's spouse wanted information regarding missing dentures and was notified the dental appointment was on 10/13/22. A 9/8/22 progress note revealed Resident 9 had a dental appointment on 10/19/22 that was changed to 10/13/22. An undated Referral Form indicated Resident 9 had insurance approved for upper and lower dentures on 11/2/22. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure meals were provided to meet the needs of residents for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 13, 20 and 22) reviewed for food and kitchen. This place residents at risk for lack of adequate nutrition and allergic reactions. Finding include: 1. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 10/2022 with diagnoses including heart failure and kidney disease. The 3/2023 TAR indicated Resident 13 was allergic to grapes and raisins. Immunization records revealed Resident 13 obtained a skin rash if she/he consumed grapes or raisins. On 3/9/23 at 9:39 AM Witness 8 (Family Member) stated Resident 13 was provided oatmeal raisin cookies on her/his meal tray earlier in the week and the cookies appeared to be made with chocolate chips until they opened the wrapped cookies together and realized the cookies contained raisins. Wrapped cookies with raisins were observed in Resident 13's room. On 3/9/23 at 10:46 AM Staff 6 (Dietary Manager) was shown the cookies with raisins from Resident 13's room and acknowledged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0888 — isolatedEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately track and document the COVID-19 status of 1 of 8 sampled facility staff (#37) reviewed for vaccinations. This placed residents at risk for infection. Findings include: A COVID-19 Staff Vaccination Status for Providers spreadsheet provided 3/6/23 revealed Staff 37 (RN) had a non-medical exemption for the COVID-19 vaccination. On 3/8/23 at 10:08 AM Staff 37 stated she thought COVID-19 vaccines were optional for staff at the facility, but she was vaccinated. Staff 37 stated she signed a vaccination declination form because she had two COVID-19 vaccinations and the facility had not asked her for proof of her COVID-19 vaccination. On 3/8/23 at 2:16 PM Staff 22 (Human Resources) stated he tracked the staff COVID-19 vaccinations. Staff 22 stated when new staff were not interested in the COVID-19 vaccination he let the DNS or infection preventionist know. Staff 22 also stated the facility was pretty lenient about non-medical exemptions and new staff did not need to explain why they needed a non-medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,593 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-11-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVAMERE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARISO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/06/2006 |
| ARI OPERATIONS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/06/2006 |
| AVAMERE GROUP LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/06/2006 |
| MIDCAP FINCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 01/22/2010 |
| ADAMS, NANCY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| CAVALLO, GLEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 06/01/2025 |
| FEAKIN, CODY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| FUNDERBERG, MICHELLE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| HILL, KEVIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/12/2022 |
| HOSKINS, TONIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/01/2025 |
| INSKEEP, TODD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/21/2022 |
| KOFSTAD, MARY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/13/2024 |
| MUNRO, JOLYNN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| OKOLI, IKE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 06/01/2025 |
| POLSON, JUSTIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/10/2025 |
| POWELSON, MICHELE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/25/2015 |
| REID, MISTY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2025 |
| SANDERS, AMANDA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 06/01/2025 |
| SIMPSON, ANDREW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| STRUNK, COLBY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| VANDERZANDEN, CARRIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| AVAMERE HEALTH SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2005 |
| AVAMERE SKILLED ADVISORS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2005 |
| ARONSON, JEFFREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/07/2025 |
| CARR, KIRSTEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2022 |
| DANA, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2022 |
| HENRIQUEZ, NELSON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| LOEWEN, MICHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/09/2023 |
| PRESLEY, YOLANDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/06/2025 |
| ROLISON, SHIRLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/20/2018 |
| KARL RICKARD MILLER JR REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/04/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 61 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $890K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385239. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.