No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avamere Rehabilitation At Park West

1703 California Avenue Southwest, Seattle, WA 98116 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 137 certified beds · (206) 937-9750 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605) — most recent Jul 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$29,820 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $29,820 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-06)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2743 California Ave SW Ste. 301 · (206) 679-4878 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2345 42nd Ave SW · (206) 933-1468 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2320 42nd Ave SW · (206) 937-0551 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1120 California Ave SW · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4320 SW Hill St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.6%14.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%1.0%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.8%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.7%17.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.4%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.5%22.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.5%15.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.0%82.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.9%19.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.7%13.4%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.091.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.111.521.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 221 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.9%CMS range 54.4–66.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.3%CMS range 6.0–11.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.8%CMS range 3.0–9.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.841.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.63
RN hours/ resident / day
1.00
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.45
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.07
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
53.5%
Total nursing turnover
58.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 137 beds and averages 88.5 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.445 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-29)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement Infection Control (IC) and Infection Prevention (IP) practices and initiate outbreak management interventions to prevent transmission of COVID-19 (a highly contagious infectious disease, causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, malaise, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases, difficulty breathing, that could result in severe impairment or death) for 29 of 39 current sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, & 29) who tested positive for COVID-19 and some who had respiratory symptoms including cough, sore throat, headache, weakness, diarrhea, vomiting, and shortness of breath; the infection spread to 3 of 3 floors of the facility. The failure to initiate contact tracing to track the spread of infection, complete an investigation to document the extent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-10-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to protect resident's skin from injury, accurately identify, assess, document, and report changes in skin integrity for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for Pressure Ulcer/Pressure Injury (PU/PI). Resident 1 experienced harm when they developed five new PU/PIs and pain. This failed practice placed residents at risk for skin injuries, PUs/PIs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . The National Institutes of Health (NIH) website showed a Pressure Injury (PI) was localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissues usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. The injury could present as intact skin or an open ulcer and may be painful. The injury occurred from intense and/or prolonged pressure or pressure in combination with friction or shearing of skin tissues. The NIH website showed it was essential to use the intended staging or classification system for each type of injury to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-09 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an effective system of communication and provision of the medical records upon transfer (expected to return) or discharge (not expected to return) of a resident to the hospital for emergency care for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 1 & 2) reviewed for hospitalization. The failure to provide required information to the receiving provider, the resident, and/or the resident representative and document the required elements in the resident's record placed residents at risk for complications in continued care, unidentified medical needs, violation of resident rights, and diminished quality of care. Findings included.<Facility Policy>A 07/2025 facility policy named Transfer or Discharge, Emergency Acute Care showed residents transferred to an acute setting for emergency treatment were provided with a notice of transfer as soon as practicable. The notice could alternately be provided to a resident representative. The transfer notice would meet all requirements for content and timing. A 06/2025 facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which residents received required written notices at the time of transfer and/or discharge, or as soon as practicable, for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 71, 102, 6, & 12), offer a bed hold for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 6), and call report to receiving facility for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 6) reviewed for hospitalization and discharge. Failure to provide residents with a written notification and offer a bed hold placed them at risk of being uninformed about their rights and a discharge that was not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences. Failure to call report to the receiving facility, at the time of transfer, placed residents at risk of a break in continuity of care and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>The facility's August 2018 Transfer or Discharge policy showed residents and/or their representatives would be informed in writing of the reason for and date of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments were completed as required for 4 (Residents 26, 7, 5, & 9) of 6 residents reviewed for PASRR screening. Facility staff failed to ensure Level 1 PASRR screenings were accurate and/or obtained prior to a resident's admission to the facility, and/or failed to ensure Level 2 PASRR evaluations were obtained on admission or after identification that a level 2 was required. These failures placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included. <Facility Policy>The facility's July 2024 PASRR policy showed the purpose of a PASRR assessment was to ensure residents with mental health or intellectual disabilities were appropriately placed and received the services they required. The policy showed PASRRs would be reviewed annually or during a significant change in condition, and Social Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assist residents with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs - personal hygiene, grooming, bathing, eating etc.) for 6 residents (Resident 77, 31, 99, 79, 8, & 28) of 8 dependent residents reviewed for ADLs. The failure to provide ADL assistance to dependent residents as required left residents at risk for poor hygiene, diminished feelings of self-worth, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised March 2018 Supporting ADLs policy, residents would be provided with the care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out ADLs. Residents who were unable to carry out ADLs independently would receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene.<Resident 77> According to the 07/08/2025 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool) Resident 77 had medically complex conditions including heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Restorative Nursing Programs (RNP) as residents were assessed to require for 6 of 8 residents (Resident 8, 11, 1, 6, 7, & 31) reviewed for position and mobility. This failure placed residents at risk for decline in mobility and Range of Motion (ROM), functional status, and other negative health outcomes.Findings included.<Facility Policy>According to the facility's July 2017 Restorative Nursing Services Policy, residents would receive restorative nursing care, as needed, to help promote optimal safety and independence. The policy showed restorative goals and objectives would be resident-centered and outlined in the resident's Care Plan (CP).<Resident 8> According to the 06/19/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment), Resident 8 had impairment of functional limitation in ROM on both legs. The MDS showed Resident 8 was dependent on staff for dressing and transfers from bed to chair, required substantial assistance from staff for rolling side to side in bed, and had no rejection of care during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: ensure staff used appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - disposable barriers such as gloves, eyewear, and gowns used to prevent exposure to infectious materials) for 2 residents (Resident 71 & 77) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms); ensure staff used appropriate Hand Hygiene (HH) during resident care for 4 residents (Resident 31, 7, 28, & 79) who were observed for care; ensure staff followed Transmission Based Precautions (TBP - a set of infection control practices used to prevent the spread of infectious agents, in addition to standard precautions) for 1 resident (Resident 79) of 1 reviewed for TBP; and ensure the facility was free of uncleanable surfaces for 2 residents (Resident 17 & 71). These failures placed residents and staff at risk for exposure to and development of contagious, communicable infectious diseases. Findings included .<Facility Policy>A review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a comfortable, appropriately sized bed for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 71 & 77) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This failed practice placed residents at risk for discomfort and skin issues.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's February 2021 Homelike Environment policy, residents would be provided a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment emphasizing comfort, personal needs and preferences. <Resident 71>According to a 04/25/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 71 had obesity, chronic wounds to their lower legs, and impairments to both of their lower extremities. The MDS assessment showed Resident 71 was fully dependent on staff to move from their bed to their wheelchair and to move from lying to a sitting position on the side of the bed. Review of the revised 06/23/2025 Activities of Daily Living Care Plan (CP) showed a goal for Resident 71 to maintain their current level of function in bed mobility and transfers. Staff were to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure walls and blinds in resident rooms were maintained in a homelike condition for 6 of 19 sample resident rooms (Rooms 211-1, 214-1, 220, 201, 106 & 118) and failed to ensure resident's personal property was kept safe for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 8) reviewed for personal property. These failures left residents at risk for a less than homelike environment, loss of personal property and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>Review of the facility's revised February 2021 Homelike Environment policy showed residents should be provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment and would be encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible.room [ROOM NUMBER]-1> Observation on 07/22/2025 at 11:51 AM showed room [ROOM NUMBER]-1 had scratched paint on the wall next to the resident's bed. The toilet seat cover in the resident's bathroom was scratched with a large patch of paint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate, investigate, and resolve grievances for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 1 & 8) reviewed for missing personal property. This failure placed residents at risk for emotional distress and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.<Facility Policy>The Facility Administrator stated they did not have a grievance policy. According to the facility policy Resident Rights revised in February 2021, residents have the right to voice their grievances to the facility without discrimination and without fear of discrimination.According to a facility policy titled, Personal Property, dated August 2022, the facility would promptly complete an investigation of misappropriation of resident's property. <Resident 1> According to the 04/24/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool) Resident 1 had clear speech and was usually understood and usually understood others. The MDS showed Resident 1 had moderate memory impairment and had a family representative listed as the primary respondent. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure residents were free from physical restraints for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 99) reviewed for physical restraints, and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 7). The failure to obtain a physician's order prior to use of a physical restraint, and evaluate to ensure least restrictive measures were in place placed the resident at risk for entrapment, injury, decreased range of motion and decreased quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's March 2015 Restraint and Device Guideline policy, the facility would maintain resident safety by avoiding unnecessary use of safety devices. If a safety device was considered necessary, staff would complete an assessment, obtain a physician's order, and obtain informed consent from the resident or their representative. The safety device would be implemented with appropriate staff education and Care Plan (CP) revision.<Resident 99> According to a 7/15/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 99 had a memory problem,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 43 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 12) of 5 residents and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 31) whose medication regimens were reviewed, were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications. This failure left residents at risk for unnecessary medications, adverse side effects and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy>The facility's revised July 2020 Psychotropic Medication Use policy showed to improve residents' quality of life, residents with specific diagnoses would be provided psychotropic medication at the lowest effective dose and documented in resident's medical record. The policy showed the facility would use nonpharmacological interventions to minimize and allow discontinuation of the need for medication. Residents on psychotropic medications would receive gradual dose reduction (GDR), unless contraindicated, to discontinue these medications.<Resident 12> According to a 06/09/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool) Resident 12 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected residents' health status and/or care needs for 1 (Resident 26) of 19 reviewed for assessments. The failure to accurately assess residents' cognitive patterns placed residents at risk for unidentified and unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised November 2018 Dementia Protocol, the facility would review the current physical, functional, and psychosocial status of individuals with dementia, and would summarize the individual's condition, related complications, and functional abilities and impairments. The Interdisciplinary team would evaluate individuals with new or progressive cognitive impairment and help identify symptoms and findings that differentiate dementia from other causes. <Resident 26>According to the 06/08/2025 modified Quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 26 had diagnoses of severe vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, a mood disorder, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide baseline Care Plans (CP) to 2 (Residents 5, & 79) of 8 residents reviewed for care planning and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 99). The failure to provide residents and/or their representatives with a summary of their baseline CP placed residents and/or their representatives at risk for not being informed of their initial plan for the delivery of care and services, and placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.Findings included .<Resident 5>According to a 06/11/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple complex diagnoses including fractures, end stage kidney disease, and respiratory failure.In an interview on 07/22/2025 at 2:16 PM, Resident 5 stated they did not have a meeting with staff to discuss their CP, were unsure what their current care goals were, and stated they did not get copies of any paperwork after admission.Review of a 06/05/2025 Baseline CP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and/or implement comprehensive Care Plans (CPs) for 4 of 19 sample residents reviewed (Residents 99, 26, 77 & 1). This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs, frustration, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to the facility's March 2022 Comprehensive Person-Centered CP policy, the facility would develop a comprehensive, person-centered CP for each resident. The CP would be consistent with each resident's assessed needs, and should include objective, measurable goals.According to the facility's November 2018 Dementia - Clinical Protocol, the facility would identify and document the resident's condition and level of support needed during care planning to maximize remaining function and quality of life.<Resident 99> According to a 07/15/2025 admission MDS, Resident 99 had adequate hearing with the use of hearing aids or other hearing appliances. Review of Resident 99's revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure resident Care Plans (CPs) were updated as needed for 2 (Residents 11 & 28) of 19 sample residents, and failed to ensure the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) attended resident care conferences to ensure residents could express their preferences and goals for 2 of 8 residents (Resident 39, & 5) reviewed for care conferences. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, and frustration. Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to the facility's March 2022 Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, the IDT, in collaboration with the resident and their representative, would develop, implement, and revise a CP for each resident to address their physical, psychosocial, and functional needs. The policy showed the IDT would review and update the CP and conduct care conferences with the residents and their representatives at least quarterly (every 3 months). The policy showed residents were to be informed of their right to participate and given advance notice of conferences. If participation was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure: nurses only signed for tasks completed for 1 of 19 sample residents (Resident 2), physician's orders were clarified as needed for 4 (Residents 7, 1, 12, & 5) of 19 sample residents, and failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 19 sample residents (Resident 5). These failures placed residents at risk for medication errors, delayed treatment, receiving unnecessary medications, and adverse outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to the facility's July 2016 Medication and Treatment Orders policy, staff were to administer medications in accordance with prescribers' written orders and, if necessary, staff would contact the prescriber for clarification. Staff were to document all interactions and order clarifications in the medical record, as appropriate.<Signing for Orders Not Completed> <Resident 2> Record review showed a 06/07/2025 pharmacist's recommendation for staff to obtain bloodwork for Resident 2. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed, monitored, refusals were documented, the provider was notified of changes, and they received the treatment they were assessed to require for 2 of 3 (Residents 28 & 1) who were reviewed for edema (swelling) management. The failure to monitor, document, implement interventions, and to follow the physician orders for edema management, placed residents at risk for decline in medical status, decreased quality of life, and unmet care needs and discomfort.Findings included .<Facility Policy>The Facility did not provide Edema Management policy. On 07/25/2025 the facility Administrator stated the facility did not have an Edema Management policy.<Resident 28> According to the 06/15/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 28 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple medically complex conditions including left side of body weakness, heart failure, and kidney failure. The MDS showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to maintain an environment that was free from accident hazards. The failure to secure chemicals in 1 of 3 soiled utility rooms and 1 of 2 storage rooms placed residents at risk for accident hazards, and diminished safety.Findings included .<2nd Floor>Observation on 07/22/2025 at 8:40 AM showed the door to the second floor soiled utility room was unlocked. One bottle of a bleach urine stain/odor remover was unsecured. The warning label on the bottle showed the chemical was an eye irritant. The bottle was one quarter full. The soiled utility room also contained a bag of fingernail polishes and a bottle of nail polish drying spray. The drying spray had a warning label that cautioned the user to prevent contact with the skin and eyes. The soiled utility room also contained a a bottle of rapid dissolving disinfectant spray with a caution warning on the front label to keep away from children.Observation on 07/22/2025 at 8:42 AM showed second floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor and report on nutritional care, provide weight monitoring, and obtain supplements as ordered for 3 (Resident 79, 26, & 1) of 11 residents reviewed for nutrition. The failure to offer meal replacements and monitor residents who consumed less than 50% of their meals and collect timely and accurate weights as ordered and per facility policy, placed residents at risk for nutrition-related complications, unplanned weight fluctuations, inaccurate assessments and delayed interventions of nutritional status, fluid overload, and other negative health outcomes.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised 2017 Nutrition Impaired/Unplanned Weight Loss-Clinical Protocol policy, staff would monitor and document weight and intake of resident's in a format which permitted comparison over time and the provider would be notified of any abrupt or persistent change from baseline appetite or food intake. The policy showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were discarded when expired, and/or returned to the pharmacy upon a resident's discharge for 1 of 3 medication rooms (First Floor Unit) observed. The facility failed to ensure resident rooms were free of unsecured medication for 1 of 19 sample residents (Resident 31) observed. The failure to ensure unneeded medications were returned to the pharmacy, discarded when expired, and were stored securely, placed residents at risk for receiving unauthorized, compromised, and/or ineffective medications.Findings included.<Facility Policy>According to the facility's Revised November 2020 Storage of Medications policy, drugs and biologicals must be locked with only authorized persons given access. The policy showed discontinued and outdated drugs must be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed.<First Floor Unit Medication Room> Observations of the First Floor Unit Medication room on 07/23/2025 at 9:18 AM with Staff AA (Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Antibiotic (ABO) Stewardship Program to promote appropriate use of ABO's, reduce the risk of unnecessary ABO use, and decrease the development of an ABO resistance for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 9 & 53) reviewed for ABO Stewardship.<Policy>According to the facility policy titled, ABO Stewardship, dated December 2016, ABOs would be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's ABO Stewardship Program. The policy showed when an ABO was prescribed to a resident the primary care practitioner would assess the resident within 72 hours. The policy showed diagnostic results would be communicated with the resident's primary care provider to determine if ABO therapy should be continued, modified, or discontinued. Findings included.In an interview on 07/28/2025 at 9:19 AM Staff D (Infection Preventionist) stated the facility used the McGeers criteria (a tool used for infection surveillance activities and management of ABO usage). Staff D stated when a resident admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents where provided with a home like environment for 2 of 3 floors (the 200 Floor and 300 Floor) and 1 of 2 elevators. The failure to ensure resident rooms were free of walls with gouges/missing paint and stained ceiling tiles and the elevator was free of broken trim left residents at risk for a less-than-homelike environment. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's February 2021 Homelike Environment policy showed residents would be provided a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The policy showed the facility environment should be clean and sanitary. <Resident Rooms> Observations on 04/15/2024 at 8:39 AM showed bed 1 in room [ROOM NUMBER] had deep gouges and exposed drywall on the wall at the head of the resident's bed and a ceiling tile falling down on one side above the resident's bed. In an interview and observation on 04/22/2024 at 3:19 PM, Staff S (Central Supply) confirmed the damage to the wall and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit the required Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) data to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within the required time frames for 6 (Resident 33, 69, 57, 17, 73, & 51) of 20 sample residents reviewed for resident assessments. This failure placed residents at risk for delays in care planning, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, revised in October 2023, showed Significant Change, Quarterly, and Annual MDS assessments must be completed no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD), and it must be submitted/transmitted within 14 days of the MDS completion date to the database as required. <Resident 33> Review of Resident 33's records showed a 07/18/2023 Significant Change MDS was not completed or transmitted by staff as required to CMS until 08/07/2023, six days after the required due date. Resident 33's 02/02/2024 Quarterly MDS was not completed or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a mental health screening required before transfer to a nursing home) assessments were revised to reflect mental health changes for 3 of 6 residents (Residents 37, 30, & 13) reviewed for PASRRs and one supplemental resident (Resident 69). This failure left residents at risk for risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health care needs. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's 03/22/2024 PASRR policy showed the purpose of a PASRR assessment was to ensure residents with mental health or intellectual disabilities were appropriately placed and received the services they required. The policy showed PASRRs would be reviewed periodically for potential changes and the Social Services was responsible. <Resident 30> According to the 03/22/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 30 had medically complex diagnoses including anxiety, dementia, a psychotic disorder. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure: Physician's Orders (POs) were clarified as needed for 6 (Residents 17, 33, 13, 57, 9, & 83) of 20 sample residents; followed for 2 (Residents 69 & 57) of 20 sample residents; nurses did not sign for incomplete tasks for 1 (Resident 69) of 20 sample residents reviewed; and orthostatic blood pressure (a process where a resident's blood pressure is taken while lying down, then sitting, then standing as practical to assess for changes in blood pressure caused by changes in elevation for safety) was monitored as required for 1 (Resident 2) of 5 residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. These failures placed residents at risk for medication errors, delayed treatment, and adverse outcomes. Findings included . <Clarification of Orders> <Resident 17> Review of Resident 17's April 2024 Medication Administration Records (MAR) showed the resident had a 07/25/2023 PO for a powdered laxative medication to be given once daily for constipation. A second 03/28/2024 PO for the same powdered laxative was also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs - i.e. grooming, bathing, eating, etc.) received the assistance they required for 4 of 9 sample residents (Residents 61, 51, 58, & 73) and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 55). The failure to provide nailcare, bathing, and eating assistance left residents at risk for embarrassment, poor personal hygiene, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's March 2018 ADLs Policy showed residents who could not perform ADLs independently should be provided the care, treatment, and services they required. The policy showed residents' ADL needs including bathing and hygiene would be assessed and provided accordingly. <Resident 61> According to the 04/03/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 61 had impaired vision, no rejection of care, and required substantial to maximal assistance with bathing and personal hygiene. The MDS showed Resident 61 had two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 (Residents 57, 69, & 51) of 6 residents reviewed for Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) services received the care and services they were assessed to require. These failures placed residents at risk for a decline in Range of Motion (ROM), increased dependence on staff, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's July 2017 Restorative Nursing Services Policy showed residents would receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. The policy showed restorative goals and objectives should be resident-centered and outlined in the resident's Care Plan (CP). <Resident 57> According to a 02/01/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 57 was cognitively intact and had multiple medically complex diagnoses including stroke with impairment of functional limitation in ROM to the upper arm on one-side and both lower legs. This MDS showed Resident 57 was dependent on staff for dressing and transfers from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of accident hazards. The failure to: ensure appropriate supervision and storage of smoking materials for 1 of 1 (Resident 83) sample residents who smoked; ensure 1 of 1 Central Supply rooms was secured; and 2 of 3 soiled utility rooms were secured, placed residents at risk for smoking accidents, accident hazards, and diminished safety. Findings included . <Smoking> <Facility Policy> The facility's revised October 2023 Smoking Policy showed smoking was only allowed in designated smoking areas. The policy showed residents who were assessed to smoke independently may store their own cigarettes but all other residents who smoked were required to store their cigarettes with the facility. <Resident 83> According to the 03/20/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) Resident 83 had impaired vision and used a wheelchair. The MDS showed Resident 83 required substantial to maximal assistance with transfers, toileting, showering, and personal hygiene and had medically complex…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing care and related services that assured resident safety and attained or maintained resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being as identified by resident assessments and according to individual plans of care, in consideration of the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population, and in accordance with the facility assessment and facility policies. The facility failed to verify skills competency for 5 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) (Staff AA, BB, CC, DD, EE, & FF) whose training documents were reviewed, 5 of 5 CNAs (Staff GG, FF, HH, II, and W) and 1 of 1 Registered Nurses (Staff O) interviewed for special focused training for tracheostomy and stoma care. The facility's failure to validate their nursing staff's knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics necessary perform…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program. The failure to develop and implement a water management program, ensure resident equipment and the facility environment was free of uncleanable surfaces, urinary catheter (tubing to facilitate urinary drainage) bags were secured, and Hand Hygiene (HH) was performed before, during, and after resident care left residents at risk for waterborne illness, exposure to communicable diseases, sickness, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Water Management Program> In an interview on 04/17/2024 at 2:30 PM Staff E (Environmental Director) was asked to provide documentation to support the facility had a water management program that included monitoring and prevention of Legionella (bacteria that can cause severe lung infections) and other waterborne pathogens. Staff E stated the water management program should be discussed with Staff A (Administrator) because there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise infection prevention and control policies and develop and implement an updated Antibiotic (ABO) Stewardship program to comply with the 10/24/2023 federal requirements. The facility failed to; implement protocols and a system to monitor, document, and analyze the appropriate use of ABOs; failed to include leadership support and accountability for 3 of 3 months (January, February, & March 2024) reviewed. The failure to implement an infection surveillance process that included gathering data on the resident's symptoms, type of infectious organism, assessment of infections to meet specific criteria for ABO treatment, and track the spread of infection through tracing similar organisms, placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate/unnecessary use of ABOs and an increased risk for ABO resistant organisms. Findings included . Review of the facility policy Surveillance for Infections (revised 09/2017) showed the facility would conduct ongoing surveillance of infections, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that maintained and promoted resident rights and dignity for 4 (Residents 37, 3, 76, & 69) of 20 sample residents. The failure to obtain consent prior to psychotropic medication treatment (Resident 37) and the failure to provide adequate privacy during the provision of care (Residents 3, 76, & 69) placed residents at risk for unwanted psychotropic medications, a diminished sense of self-worth, and wellbeing. Findings included . <Consent> <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 08/25/2020 Psychotropic Medication policy when a resident received a new order for a psychotropic medication the facility would obtain informed consent (a process where a resident is informed of the risks and benefits of a treatment before they agree to receive it) prior to administration of the medication. <Resident 37> According to the 02/27/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 37 was assessed with severe memory impairment and showed verbal behaviors towards…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which residents received required written notices at the time of transfer/discharge, or as soon as practicable, for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 30, 66, & 97) reviewed for hospitalization. Failure to ensure a written notification was provided to the resident and/or representative of the reasons for the discharge and in a language and manner the resident and/or representative understood, placed residents at risk for a discharge that was not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's March 2021 Transfers and Discharges Notice policy residents should be informed in writing and in a language and format of their choice of the reason for and date or the transfer or discharge. The policy showed for emergent transfers the notification should be provided as soon as practical, and a copy provided to the State Long-Term Care Ombuds (an advocacy group).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative a written notice of the facility's bed hold (a process allowing residents who transfer from a facility temporarily to return to the same bed) policy, at the time of transfer or within 24 hours, for 2 of 4 sample residents (Resident 66 & 97) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents and their representatives at risk of not being informed of their right to, and the cost of, holding the resident's bed while hospitalized that was necessary for decision-making. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's October 2022 Bed Hold and Returns policy showed all residents and/or their representatives would be provided written information regarding the facility's bed hold process both upon admission and at the time of transfer. The policy showed in the case of an emergent transfer the facility would provide this notification within 24 hours. <Resident 66> According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    <Resident 81> According to the 03/21/2024 admission MDS Resident 81 was assessed with intact memory and was able to understand and be understood in conversation. The MDS showed Resident 81 showed no rejection of care during the assessment's seven-day lookback period. The section of this MDS addressing Resident 81's mood included instructions for staff to conduct a mood interview with the resident unless the resident was rarely or never understood in conversation. Instead, staff completed a staff assessment of Resident 81's mood. The section of this MDS addressing pain included instructions for staff to conduct a pain interview with Resident 81 unless the resident was rarely or never understood in conversation. This section was incomplete showing a - (dash) for four questions discussing with what frequency Resident 81's pain interfered with different aspects of their life, instead of including a value indicating a frequency. The MDS showed Resident 81 had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. In an interview on 04/16/2024 at 9:53 AM Resident 81 stated all their teeth were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the failed to ensure a person-centered comprehensive Care Plan (CP) was developed and implemented for 4 of 20 sample residents (Resident's 37, 73, 66, & 91) whose CPs were reviewed. Failure to address the individualized care needs for each resident placed residents at risk for inconsistent and/or inadequate care, and a decreased quality of life. <Facility Policy> According to the facility's [DATE] Comprehensive Person-Centered CP policy, the facility would develop a comprehensive, person-centered CP for each resident. The CP would be consistent with each resident's assessed needs, and should include objective, measurable goals. <Resident 66> According to the [DATE] Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 66 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had medical diagnoses including kidney and heart failure, and high blood pressure. The assessment showed Resident 66 had no broken teeth. Observation on [DATE] at 2:33 PM and [DATE] at 8:12 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    <Care Plan Revision> <Resident 83> According to the 03/20/2024 Quarterly MDS Resident 83 had diagnoses including coronary artery disease and heart failure. The MDS showed Resident 83 did not receive an anticoagulant medication. The MDS showed Resident 83 had an above knee left leg amputation. Review of Resident 83's Physician's Orders (POs) showed no orders for an anticoagulant medication. The 09/16/2023 Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT - a condition where blood clots form in veins located deep inside the body, often the legs) CP included an intervention for nursing staff to monitor laboratory values to monitor/document effect of anticoagulant therapy [ .] report values outside desired range. In an interview on 04/22/2024 at 2:23 PM Staff I (Resident Care Manager - RCM) stated Resident 83 did not receive an anticoagulant medication. Staff I reviewed Resident 83's DVT CP and stated the CP was inaccurate and should be updated.Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CP) were updated and/or revised as needed for 2 of 20 (Residents 83 and 51)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement care for 1 (Resident 69) of 1 resident reviewed for Tube Feeding (TF - nutrition delivered into the stomach by tube) management including: failure to provide a consistent formula or rate of administration; failure to document the total intake provided over 24 hours; failure to clarify and administer the amount of water flushing required by the resident; and failure to label and date the TF formula. These failures placed Resident 69 at risk for TF complications, inadequate or excessive calorie or protein intake and/or hydration. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of a revised November 2018 facility, Enteral (directly to the intestine) Nutrition policy showed the nurse would confirm TF orders were complete and included: the nutritional product; delivery site; the specific access device; administration method (continuous, bolus [give large doses of formula several times a day], intermittent); volume and rate of administration .; and instructions for flushing (solution, volume, frequency,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff timely acted on irregularities identified by the consultant pharmacist for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 33) reviewed for medications. The failure to act on medication-related irregularities identified by the consultant pharmacist placed the residents at risk for medication-related complications. Findings included . <Resident 33> According to a 02/02/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 33 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including high blood pressure and hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat particles in the blood). Review of Resident 33's Physician Orders (PO) showed a 12/23/2022 order for a medication to be given daily for hyperlipidemia. A 10/23/2023 pharmacy consultation report revealed recommendations to facility to obtain a lipid panel blood test with the next routine lab draw for periodic monitoring. This recommendation was signed by the provider on 10/25/2023 with agree indicated. Review of the pharmacy November 2023 and December 2023 recommendations pending response…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sample residents (Resident 58) was reviewed for Antibiotic (ABO) use. Failure to follow provider's recommendations and to schedule appointments to adjust medications placed residents at risk for inadequate treatment of medical conditions and the potential for adverse side effects of unnecessary medications. Findings included . <Resident 58> According to the 02/10/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 58 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including kidney failure and shortness of breath. The MDS showed Resident 58 received ABO medications during the assessment period. Review of the April 2024 Medication Administration Record showed Resident 58 received a steroid medication (an anti-inflammatory medication) daily for kidney disease since 01/11/2024. Resident 58 received an ABO medication every 48 hours for long term use of systemic steroids since 11/16/2023. According to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 (Residents 37) sample residents. The failure to ensure residents had an appropriate diagnosis in place prior to administration left residents at risk for adverse side effects, unnecessary psychotropic medications, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's 08/25/2020 Psychoactive Medication Treatment policy showed in order to improve residents' quality of life, residents with supporting diagnoses would be provided psychoactive medications at the lowest effective dose. <Resident 37> According to the 02/27/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set Resident 37 was assessed with severe memory impairment and showed verbal behaviors towards others on one-to-three days of the assessment's 7-day look back period. The MDS showed Resident 37 had medically complex diagnoses including dementia and an adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. Review of the physician's orders showed Resident 37 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were secured and expired medications and biologicals were disposed of timely in accordance with professional standards in 1 of 2 medication rooms and 2 of 4 medication carts reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving expired medications and at risk for medication errors. Findings included . Facility Medication Rooms <First Floor Medication Room> Observation of the first floor medication room on 04/17/2024 at 9:53 AM, showed two ostomy pouches (external devices that collect waste from the body) expired on 11/24/2022, Intravenous (IV) tubing expired on 07/18/2023, and one bag of IV fluid 1000 expired on 01/2024. The medication room refrigerator contained one bag of IV antibiotic medication that expired on 03/01/2024 and a liquid antacid medication which expired on 02/01/2024 for a discharged resident. The medication room refrigerator contained four insulin pens, immunization injections for pneumonia, and one antianxiety liquid medication for five residents who discharged from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt dental services were provided for 1 (Resident 57) of 4 sample residents reviewed for dental services. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet dental needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of a revised December 2016 facility, Dental Services policy showed routine and emergency dental services were available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. This policy stated social services representatives would assist residents with appointments and transportation arrangements. <Resident 57> According to a 05/03/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), Resident 57 was cognitively intact, had no rejection of care, and was identified with obvious or likely cavities or broken natural teeth. In an interview on 04/16/2024 at 9:41 AM, Resident 57 stated they had broken teeth, oral pain, and difficulty with chewing at times. Resident 57 stated a dentist had, come by about a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0571 — isolated
    Limit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement their policy and procedures for accurate billing practices and imposed charges for services covered under Medicare for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for billing accuracy. The failure to follow insurance verification for out-of-pocket (OOP) requirements, ensure accuracy of resident billing statements, failure to correctly bill insurance copays, and failure to follow established processes for collections of past due balances placed residents at risk for undue stress and worry of their personal financial obligations, overpayment for insurance covered services, and potential diminished quality of life. Findings included . In an interview on 10/06/2023 at 1:05 PM, Resident 1's Representative (RR) stated the facility billed Resident 1 for services that were covered by Resident 1's Medicare managed insurance provider. RR stated Resident 1 met the maximum OOP requirement and the insurance provider was required to cover the services but the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility administration failed to implement and monitor billing office staff and billing practices. The failure to identify billing office failures through ongoing monitoring of resident accounts placed residents at risk of overpayment for insurance covered services and Medicare billing fraud. Findings included . Review of the 01/13/2022 facility policy Managed Care/Commercial Verification directed admission staff to verify insurance deductibles and out-of-pocket (OOP) maximum, and if OOP maximum had been met. Review of the 01/13/2022 facility policy Financial Verification and Documentation directed admission staff to complete the first step of insurance verification then notify the billing office staff of the verification details. The policy stated then the Business Office Manager would review the verification for accuracy and complete the second step of the verification process. Review of the 01/22/2018 document called SNF BOM Non-negotiables (Skilled Nursing Business Office Non-negotiable) showed a list of tasks required of the Business…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for dependent residents with for 3 (Residents 88, 31 & 41) of 5 dependent residents reviewed for ADLs. Facility failure to provide ADL assistance placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, embarrassment, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Facility Policy According to the facility's revised 03/2018 Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) policy, appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLS independently, with consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: (a) Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care) Resident 88 According to the 01/17/2023 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 88 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis of four limbs), and an unspecified injury of cervical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement their non-smoking policy for 2 (Residents 86 & 9) 2 of sample residents and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 34) reviewed for smoking. Facility failure to effectively implement their policy left residents at risk of frustration, burns, other smoking injuries, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . In an interview on 01/31/2023 at 9:11 AM Staff A (Administrator) stated the facility was non-smoking since converting from a smoking facility after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Staff A stated there were four residents who admitted when the facility permitted smoking on the campus. The facility permitted these residents to continue to smoke off campus. Staff S stated there was one additional resident (Resident 34) for whom the facility provided smoking cessation treatments. Facility Policy Record review showed the facility's policy binder did not include a non-smoking policy. The binder included an undated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) to promote the safe usage of antibiotics and collect outcome data. Facility failure to develop and implement an ASP placed all residents prescribed antibiotics at risk for antibiotic resistance and poor health outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility's Infection Control Program policies and procedures showed no of evidence of an annual review of the ASP or any policies related to the ASP. In an interview on 02/02/2023 at 2:22 PM, Staff C (Regional Nurse Consultant) confirmed that due to a management change at the facility, infection prevention and control documentation was not available for review and there was no current policy related to ASP. Staff C confirmed the facility lacked an effective ASP, including tracking and trending of resident infections, and potential identification of resident infections as the facility's Electronic Chart system was not functional at that time, and the dashboard feature the facility utilized for ASP analysis was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-03 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or their representative with written notification of a facility-initiated transfer for 1 (Resident 62) of 1 residents reviewed for hospitalization, and failed to provide notification of transfer to the Ombudsman. These failures placed residents and/or their representatives at risk of not being informed of their condition, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review showed Resident 62 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] for emergent care and returned to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documentation in the record indicating Resident 62 and/or their representative were provided with written notification of the transfer. In an interview on 02/02/2023 at 2:23 PM Staff C (Regional Nurse Consultant) confirmed the facility failed to provide Resident 62 and/or the resident's representative and the Ombudsman a copy of the notice at the time of the emergent transfer. Staff C confirmed the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-03 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or representative information regarding a Bed Hold for 1 (Resident 62) of 1 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. Facility failure to provide information regarding bed holds left residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while out of the facility Findings included . Review of Resident 62's record showed they admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The record showed Resident 62 discharged to the hospital on [DATE] for emergency care and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 62's record included no indication the facility provided the facility's bed hold policy to Resident 62 or their repesentative. In an interview on 02/02/2023 at 2:23 PM, Staff C (Regional Nurse Consultant) confirmed the facility failed to provide Resident 62 and/or their representative with the facility's bed hold policy. Staff C confirmed the facility lacked policies and procedures for providing the bed hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Level 2 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) recommendations were followed for 2 Residents (Residents 79 & 3) of 7 residents reviewed for PASSAR. Facility failure to implement mental health services recommended the Level 2 PASARRs left residents at risk for unmet mental health needs and a diminsihed quality of life. Findings included . The facility's 07/28/2015 Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR) policy showed the PASARR program is an advocacy program mandated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to ensure that nursing home applicants and residents with mental illness/developmental disabilities are appropriately placed and receive necessary services to meet their needs. The policy showed recommendations made in level 2 evaluations will be incorporated into the resident's care plan by the IDT [Interdisciplinary team - senior staff/department managers who oversee clinical care] team. Resident 79…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-03 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided for 1 (Resident 31) of 1 resident reviewed for dental services. Facility failure to provide routine dental services left residents at risk for poor dental health and diminished quality of life. Findings included . In an interview on 02/03/2023 at 3:20 PM, Staff C (Regional Nurse Consultant) stated the facility did not have a policy related to the provision of routine dental services. According to the 12/06/2022 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 31 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident 31 had no dental concerns. Record review showed Resident 31's comprehensive Care Plan did not address their dental status. According to an 11/30/2022 Oral Health Dental Screening Resident 31 had no natural teeth or tooth fragments. The oral health screening indicated Resident 31 did not have dentures. According to an a 10/14/2022 Dental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: maintain infection control during personal care provided to 1 resident of 1 samle residents (Resident 38) observed during personal care and failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while administering an inhaled medication on the COVID-19 unit for 1 of 7 sample residents (Resident 80) observed during medication pass. These failures placed residents at risk for the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection. Findings included . Facility Policy According to the facility's 09/19/2022 Infection Prevention, Control and Surveillance (IPC) policy faciilty staff would perform hand hygiene as indicated by national guidelines and per the facility's Hand Hygiene policy. The Hand Hygiene policy directed staff to use alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) before providing care, and when moving from a contaminated body site to clean body site such as when changing a brief. The facility's updated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$29,820 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $29,820 — penalty dated 2024-02-06
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-11-19 for 33 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVAMERE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of EugeneEugene, OR 1 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of LebanonLebanon, OR 2 of 5Avamere At Pacific RidgeTacoma, WA 2 of 5Avamere Health Services Of Rogue ValleyMedford, OR 2 of 5Avamere Olympic Rehabilitation Of SequimSequim, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of IssaquahIssaquah, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Oregon CityOregon City, OR 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of ShorelineSeattle, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation of BurienBurien, WA 2 of 5Avamere Riverpark Of EugeneEugene, OR 2 of 5Avamere Transitional Care At SunnysideSalem, OR 3 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of HillsboroHillsboro, OR 4 of 5Avamere Court At KeizerKeizer, OR 4 of 5Avamere Crestview Of PortlandPortland, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation At RidgemontPort Orchard, WA 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of ClackamasGladstone, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Junction CityJunction City, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of King CityTigard, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of NewportNewport, OR 4 of 5Avamere Transitional Care Of Puget SoundTacoma, WA 4 of 5Richmond Beach RehabShoreline, WA 4 of 5The PEARL AT KRUSE WAYLake Oswego, OR 5 of 5Avamere At Three FountainsMedford, OR 5 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Cascade ParkVancouver, WA 5 of 5Queen Anne HealthcareSeattle, WA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ARISO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2023
ARI OPERATIONS, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2023
AVAMERE GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2023
KARL RICKARD MILLER JR REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2023
MILLER, KARLIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2023
MIDCAP FINCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2023
CAVALLO, GLENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2025
FEAKIN, CODYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
FUNDERBERG, MICHELLEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
GARCIA, ROBERTOIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2026
INSKEEP, TODDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/21/2022
KOFSTAD, MARYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/13/2024
REID, MISTYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2025
STAPLES, CAROLYNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
STRUNK, COLBYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
VANDERZANDEN, CARRIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2025
AVAMERE HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
AVAMERE SKILLED ADVISORS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
ASCENCIO, IGNACIOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/10/2025
CHAIREZ, JUANITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/16/2026
CHU, CALEBIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
FANUNAL, LORIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2023
FISHER, TONYAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/19/2026
FOWLER, KATHERINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
PRESLEY, YOLANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
SIMPSON, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
PACIFIC MEDICAL SPECIALTY GROUPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
RANDE HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
SABRA HEALTH CARE REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
SNAPMEDTECH,INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/08/2025
GAMES, KIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
MINHAS, KAMALJITIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
NIELSON, CHARLESIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/02/2026
VAHORA, REHANABENIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 57 rows in the source record cover these 34 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$885K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 12%Other / private 18%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $885K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$468per resident / day
operating cost
$14,240per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$401per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505270. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next