Avamere Rehabilitation Of Lebanon
350 S. 8th, Lebanon, OR 97355 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 84 certified beds · (541) 259-1221 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $20,303 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-18)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.3% | 14.9% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.9% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 2.0% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.7% | 4.9% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.2% | 20.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.3% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.1% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.3% | 5.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 34.7% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.9% | 13.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 65.3% | 81.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.6% | 21.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.9% | 16.1% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.27 | 1.48 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.90 | 2.35 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 116 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 80.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.5%CMS range 53.0–71.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 6.8–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 80.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 73.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.5%CMS range 2.7–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 60.9 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.31 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.67 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician ordered diets were provided as ordered for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 3, 39 and 57) reviewed for nutrition. This deficient practice was determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation. Resident 57 was provided food not prepared according to their physician ordered diet texture, and this resulted in a severe coughing episode and risk of choking and/or aspiration. Staff were aware the food they were providing the resident was not appropriate. Findings include: 1. Resident 57 admitted 3/2024 with a diagnosis of pneumonitis (inflamation of lung tissue) due to inhalation of food and vomit, and CVA (cerebral vascular accident) with severe expressive aphasia (non-verbal) as well as severe oropharyngeal dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 57 was physician ordered for minced and moist textured food and care planned to be supervised for all oral intake. She/he had a recent history of aspiration (food or fluid enters the lungs), and pneumonia related to aspiration. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet resident needs in a timely manner for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 1, 2 and 5) reviewed for call light times. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include:The facility's 4/29/26 Quality Assurance Resident Council meeting minutes indicated resident's call lights were not answered timely. Attached to the report were the Bi-Monthly Resident Counsel Questions. One question asked whether staff respond to call lights within a 10-minute time frame; the documented response was no. Another question asked whether there were enough staff to meet residents' needs, and the documented response was no. 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 3/2026 with diagnoses including diabetes and chronic pain. A 3/30/26 care plan indicated Resident 1 was at high risk for falls. The Call Data Report for call light wait times from 4/1/26 through 4/7/26 indicated the following:-On 4/4/26 at 4:16 PM, Resident 1's call light wait time was 20 minutes and at 6:52 PM the call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to reduce the risk of a potential accident hazard for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 3/2026 with diagnoses including diabetes, foot ulcer and chronic pain. A 4/4/26 admission MDS indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. A 4/23/26 After Visit Summary indicated post-anesthesia/sedation instructions to not stay alone, a responsible person should be with you as you may be lightheaded, experience dizziness, and sleepiness. On 5/1/26 the State Survey agency received a public complaint alleging Resident 1 did not have a staff member accompany the resident to the medical appointment. The resident needed assistance with her/his wheelchair going long distances, up inclines and over bumps. On 5/8/26 at 8:29 AM, Resident 1 stated she/he had day surgery for her/his foot on 4/23/26. Staff 16 (CNA) accompanied her/him to the surgery, but the facility later picked up Staff 16. Resident 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain lab samples for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for a delay in treatment. Findings include:Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 3/2026 with diagnoses including kidney disease. A 4/2/26 Nursing Note indicated the physician called to inform Staff 26 (RN) there were STAT (immediately) laboratory orders for complete blood count and leukocytosis (elevated white blood cell count). A 4/3/26 Order Note indicated Staff 24 (RN) had attempted two times to obtain the STAT CBC sample but was unable to do so. On 5/12/26 at 10:28 AM, Staff 24 stated she normally wrote a note if she could not obtain a lab sample and pass it on to the next shift. Staff 24 stated a physician-ordered lab test should have been completed on the same day as the order. On 5/12/26 at 12:14 PM, Staff 26 stated the facility received numerous STAT laboratory orders. Staff 26 stated she was often switched from one side of the facility to another, and she may not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received ADL assistance for bathing for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#7) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include:Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with diagnoses including dementia and stroke. A 10/21/25 admission MDS indicated Resident 7 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for showers. Resident 7's 12/2025 Documentation Survey Report (CNA task report) indicated the resident received bathing on day shift on Wednesdays and Sundays. On 12/24/25 the report was blank for bathing and on 12/28/25 the report documented Resident 7 received bathing and was dependent on staff for assistance. The facility's 12/29/25 investigation documented that Resident 7 did not receive a bath on 12/28/25, and it had been falsely documented the resident received bathing on that day. A Facility Reported Incident form dated 12/31/25, documented on 12/28/25, indicated Staff 5 (CNA) noted providing bathing to Resident 7, however,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to obtain orders and provide treatment for non-pressure skin wounds for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for worsening wounds. Findings include:Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with diagnoses including diabetes and non-pressure chronic ulcer on the left foot. The hospital Physician Admissions Orders dated 10/29/25 documented an ulcer of the left second toe, limited to breakdown of skin and pain of the toe. A 10/30/25 admission Nursing Database assessment recorded scabs on Resident 2's 2nd and 4th toes and the top of her/his left foot. A 11/6/25 admission MDS indicated Resident 2 had a non-pressure chronic ulcer on the left foot. No physician orders or treatment were found in Resident 2's clinical records for her/his left foot ulcer from 10/30/25 through 11/15/25. A Nursing Care Note dated 11/16/25 documented staff sent a message to the physician which indicated Resident 2's left second toe had a scab and treatment was initiated.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-08 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined that facility failed to demonstrate active involvement of staff and residents to determine staffing needs for 1 of 1 facility assessment. This placed residents at risk for inadequate staffing to meet resident needs. Findings include:The 2025 Facility Assessment indicated the facility had areas of insufficiencies in staffing, training, services and personnel.On 9/4/25 at 4:59 PM, Staff 23 (CNA) stated staff were not asked to provide input regarding staffing needs based on the acuity (severity of condition) of residents. On 9/5/25 at 11:07 AM, members of the Resident Council stated concerns about staffing had been discussed during previous meetings, but no resolution had been reached. The Resident Council reported the facility utilized agency staff and felt the staff members required additional training. On 9/7/25 at 2:42 PM, Staff 7 (Resident Care Manager-LPN) stated staff were not fully trained which resulted in some staff resignations. Staff 7 stated there was no formal process to provide feedback to management related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices during a COVID-19 outbreak for 2 of 2 halls reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for exposure to the COVID-19 virus and other infectious disease. Findings include: The facility's COVID-19 Testing Program Guidelines dated 6/7/24 included the following: Facility testing programs for both the residents as well as the facility staff are implemented at the facility in addition to other infection prevention and control activities and interventions aimed at preventing the spread, detecting cases quickly and stopping transmission. These infection control activities including the testing programs are coordinated and overseen by the facility Infection Preventionist who is in contact with the local health department as needed. The facility's COVID-19 Identification and Management of Ill Residents policy dated 7/2020 included the following: Staff caring for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-08 · tag F0572 — patternGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of their rights both orally and in writing on an ongoing basis for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Resident Council. This placed residents at risk for not being informed of their rights. Findings include:A review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes from 6/28/25, 7/25/25, and 8/27/25 revealed resident rights were not reviewed during any of the meetings.On 9/4/25 at 2:08 PM, Staff 27 (Activity Director) stated he did not review resident rights during Resident Council meetings.On 9/5/25 at 10:51 AM, members of the Resident Council confirmed resident rights were not reviewed during the meetings.On 9/8/25 at 11:38 AM, Staff 1 (Administrator) stated the expected resident rights to be reviewed with residents during Resident Council meetings.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-08 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with a written bed hold notification, including reserved bed hold payment, at the time of transfer to the hospital and notify the Ombudsman for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 10, 11, 67, and 69) reviewed for hospitalization and discharge. This placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their choices and potential financial responsibilities. Findings include:A review of the facility's Transfer or Discharge, Emergency Acute Care and Bed-Holds and Return policy dated 10/2022 revealed the following: -When a resident is transferred to an acute care facility a notice of transfer is provided to the resident and resident representative. -A Copy of the transfer was also sent to the LTC Ombudsman. -All resident/representatives were provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence. 1.Resident 10 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide covered refuse containers for 3 of 4 exterior refuse containers observed. This placed residents at risk for pest infestations. Findings include: On 9/2/25 at 10:04 AM, an uncovered exterior refuse container was observed outside a North Hall exit. The container held food containers and other trash. On 9/4/25 at 10:03 AM, uncovered exterior refuse containers were observed outside a second North Hall exit and a rear exit. The containers held food debris and other trash. On 9/5/25 at 10:00 AM, Staff 4 (Maintenance Lead) observed the uncovered refuse containers and stated there were no lids available for the containers. On 9/8/25 at 12:38 PM, Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 3 (Regional Director of Quality Assurance) acknowledged exterior refuse containers needed to be covered and there were refuse containers without covers at 3 exterior doors.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess 1 of 3 resident (#11) reviewed for positioning and hospitalization. This placed resident at risk for unassessed needs. Findings include:Resident 11 was admitted to facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease.On 9/2/25 at 2:19 PM, Resident 11 stated she/he was not certain of what her/his care needs consisted of, as she/he had recently experienced multiple hospitalizations.A review of Resident 11's clinical record revealed her/his Annual MDS completion deadline date was 8/2/25 and was incomplete as of 9/7/25. A review of Resident's clinical record revealed she/he was hospitalized on [DATE], 7/29/25, 8/13/25 and 8/18/25 and her/his most recent entry back to facility was on 8/22/25. No evidence was found in the clinical record to indicate a significant change assessment, or an admissions assessment was completed as of 9/7/25.On 9/8/25 at 8:58 AM, Staff 15 (Regional Reimbursement Analyst)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to coordinate the appropriate services to address communication needs for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#6) reviewed for communication. This placed residents at risk for ineffective communication and unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with diagnoses including persistent vegetative state (awake with no environmental awareness) and traumatic brain injury.The 4/24/25 admission MDS indicated Resident 6's ability to understand others was not assessed.A 5/26/25 physician order indicated PT, OT, SLP per family request. A 7/21/25 facility Care Conference Information form indicated Witness 2 (Family Member) requested Staff 6 (Resident Care Manager-LPN) coordinate referrals for OT. PT, SLP and a neurologist (brain disorder specialist).A 7/23/25 revised care plan indicated Resident 6 was not able to make her/his needs known and used non-verbal techniques to supplement her/his communication.On 9/2/25 at 12:59 PM, Witness 2 stated Resident 6 previously communicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide bathing and shower care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#16) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for poor hygiene. Findings include: Resident 16 was admitted to facility on 7/5/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and metabolic encephalopathy (temporary or permanent brain dysfunction caused by a problem with the body's metabolism).Resident 16's 7/5/25 Care Plan indicated she/he required two staff to assist with bathing.Resident 7/13/25 admission MDS indicated the resident was dependent on assistance with bathing/showering.Resident 16's 7/2025 Bath/Shower task logs indicated the resident received showers on 7/8/25, 7/15/25 and 7/22/25. There was no documentation for 7/11/25, 7/18/25, and 7/29/25, which were Resident 16's scheduled shower days, as those entries were left blank.A review of Resident 16's Progress Notes from 7/5/25 through 7/30/25 revealed no evidence the resident was offered additional a showering opportunity when a shower was refused or not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 4 sampled residents (# 49) reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for wound infections. Findings include:Resident 49 was admitted to the facility in 8/2025 with diagnoses including a leg fracture.An 8/8/25 Orthopedic Physician Order directed staff to remove Resident 49's dressing one week after 8/8/25. Staff were instructed to gently cleanse the incision using warm water and soap, pat dry, apply a nonadhesive pad or gauze dressing secured with tape, and change the dressing every one to two days until the follow-up appointment. Staff were to contact Trauma/Orthopedics if signs or symptoms of redness, drainage, onset of pain, chills, fever, sweats, or infection were observed.The 8/25 TAR did not contain the Orthopedic Physician's order for wound care. There was no evidence the wound care was completed.On 8/25/25, a Progress Note indicated Resident 49's middle incision on her/his left thigh was red, swollen, and warm to the touch. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to smoking safety for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#37) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for increased smoking hazards and avoidable accidents. Findings include: The facility provided the following schedule for smoking:3:00 AM9:30 AM1:30 PM4:00 PM7:45 PM11:00 PMResident 37 was admitted to the facility in 9/2019 with diagnoses including inhalant dependence with inhalant-induced dementia (a condition where an individual has developed a physical or psychological reliance on substances which are inhaled to induce psychoactive effects).Resident 37's 8/8/25 Annual MDS assessment indicated she/he was cognitively intact.Resident 37's comprehensive Care Plan related to smoking safety last revised 8/26/25 indicated although she/he was assessed to be independent with smoking, she/he was to smoke in the smoking areas and to follow the smoking schedule. The care plan also indicated Resident 37's clothing and hands were to be checked for burns and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure annual performance reviews for CNA staff were completed for 2 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#s 24 and 25) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk due to lack of competent staff. Findings include:A review of personnel profile records revealed the following.-Staff 24 (hired on 5/14/20): The last performance review was dated 6/12/24.-Staff 25 (hired on 8/1/18): The last performance review was dated 8/15/24.On 9/8/25 at 11:36 AM, Staff 1 (Administrator) stated he expected the timely completion of annual staff evaluations.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to timely address a new identified behavior for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for mood and behavior. This placed residents at risk for lack of emotional and behavioral health needs. Findings include:Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with diagnoses including anxiety and heart failure. The 2/2025 Facility Assessment revealed behavior health staffing was insufficient. The 7/23/25 admission MDS revealed Resident 2 had a BIMS score of 15 which revealed she/he was cognitively intact, was depressed two to six days during the previous two weeks and received no antidepressant medications. The 8/2025 Behavior Monitoring Record revealed Resident 2 exhibited inappropriate behaviors on nine of 31 days which included refusal of care, confabulation (fabrication of false memories), and verbal aggression. On eight out of nine days, behavior interventions did not alter the outcome. The 8/1/25 through 9/5/25 Progress Notes revealed Resident 2 exhibited no additional behaviors. An 8/12/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure treatment carts were locked and secured appropriately for 2 of 2 treatment carts observed during random observations for medication and treatment cart storage. This placed residents at risk for unsafe access to stored medications. Findings include: 1. On 9/4/25 at 7:15 AM, the North Hall treatment cart was unlocked. Staff and residents were observed to be walking by the treatment cart.On 9/4/25 at 7:17 AM, Staff 17 (CMA) walked by the cart, walked back, and locked the cart. Staff 17 stated she was not in charge of the treatment cart, but noticed it was unlocked and locked it on behalf of Staff 19. She stated Staff 19 was with a resident. On 9/4/25 at 7:19 AM, Staff 19 (RN - Charge Nurse) stated she usually locked the treatment cart before walking away, but was unsure why she did not lock the treatment cart. The treatment cart contained insulin, needles, glucometers, and IV supplies.On 9/8/25 at 12:40 AM, Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 3 (Regional Director of QA) stated they expected treatment carts…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow up on dental services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for dental care. This placed residents at risk for lack of dental services. Findings include:The facility's Dental Services policy dated 12/2016 included the following:Social services representatives will assist residents with appointments, transportation arrangements, and reimbursement of dental services. All dental services provided are recorded in the resident's medical record.The facility's Referrals to Social Service Director dated 11/2024 included the following:Any referrals for the following areas will be made to the social services department: dental.Social services is responsible for the follow up and communication with outside providers for any of the above referrals.The Social Services Director will document any referrals made to ancillary services, mental health services, or additional community services/supports and will also document the outcomes following these referrals.Resident 11 was admitted to facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate staffing to meet resident needs for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include:1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including dementia and stroke. A 5/2025 Documentation Survey Report revealed Resident 3’s showers were typically provided during the evening shifts. The resident was scheduled to receive a shower on 5/27/25, and there was no documentation Resident 3’s shower was completed. The 5/27/25 Direct Care Staff Daily Report indicated five CNAs worked during the evening shift with a facility census of 56 residents. A 6/2/25 public complaint was received which alleged, on 5/27/25, each CNA had 12 residents during the evening shift due to call outs, and it was possible resident showers were not provided. A 6/12/25 revised care plan indicated Resident 3 required one person to assist with bathing. On 7/21/25 at 12:14 PM, Staff 13 (LPN) stated she recalled 5/27/25 as a “terrible” day.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to respond timely to a resident's grievance for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for missing property. This placed residents at risk for unresolved concerns. Findings include: A Grievance Policy last revised 1/2017 revealed the facility would promptly address grievances. The grievance would be addressed within five days of its receipt. The Grievance official, administrator, or department head would contact the concerned party to inform them of the resolution of their concern. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 4/2021 with a diagnosis of diabetes. Resident 8's 5/14/25 quarterly MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 8's Missing Property investigation initiated on 7/11/25 revealed when she/he went to take money out of her/his wallet, there was only 20 dollars instead of 65 dollars in her his wallet. Resident 8 reported there should have been three 20-dollar bills and five one-dollar bills. With the resident's permission, staff looked in Resident 8's wallet and observed one 20-dollar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's cell phone was not stolen for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for missing property. This placed residents at risk for loss of property. Findings include:Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with a diagnosis of a stroke. Resident 3's 2/19/25 quarterly MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 3's 4/7/25 Theft investigation revealed Resident 3 reported her/his cell phone was missing. Resident 3 reported on the evening of 4/6/25 she/he used the phone to call her/his spouse and after the call was completed placed the phone on her/his bedside table. The investigation included staff interviews verifying Resident 3 had her/his phone the evening of 4/6/25. Resident 3's spouse filed a police report the following day. Resident 3's spouse was able to use a phone locator and Resident 3's phone was a few blocks from the facility. A 5/10/25 letter from Witness 1 revealed a request for reimbursement for the lost phone and for the purchase of a new phone.A 5/16/25 bank…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow resident rights for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 2) reviewed for resident rights. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity. Findings include: Resident 2 admitted to facility in 7/2024, with diagnoses including dementia. A 1/2025 Quarterly MDS Assessment indicated Resident 2 was moderately cognitively impaired. The facility's abuse investigation dated 10/3/24 indicated the following: -Staff 4 (CNA) changed Resident 2's soiled shirt. Resident 2 had told Staff 4 to leave her/him alone and not change her/his shirt. -On 10/3/24 Resident 2 stated the lady took her/him to the room and ripped Resident 2's shirt off. Resident 2 stated they refused to have their shirt removed. -On 10/3/24 Staff 4 (CNA) stated she went into Resident 2's room to change her/his shirt. The shirt was a lot dirtier than just wiping it off. Staff 4 stated she explained this to Resident 2, but the resident fought and cussed at her while she changed the resident's shirt. Staff 4 notified Staff 5 (LPN) that Resident 2 was very…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to follow recipes to meet menu and therapeutic standards for 1 of 1 kitchen. This place residents at risk for lack of meal satisfaction and compromised nutrition. Finding include: The 7/18/24 posted lunch menu included breaded pork cutlet, au gratin potatoes, cauliflower and the alternative menu was sloppy joes, cheddar mash potatoes and broccoli. On 7/18/24 at 11:20 AM Staff 35 (Cook) was observed to assemble lunch and was asked to provide the recipes used to prepare the meal. Staff 35 stated he worked in the facility for three weeks and no recipes were provided during his training. Staff 35 stated no recipes were followed to prepare any of the foods served for lunch. On 7/18/24 at 12:03 PM and 12:53 PM Staff 5 (Certified Dietary Manager) stated a new menu system with recipes was introduced to the facility in 6/2024 and recipes should have been printed for all therapeutic diets and followed.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper flavor and food temperatures were maintained for meals served for 1 of 5 sampled resident (#27) and 1 of 1 facility kitchen reviewed for dining services. This placed residents at risk for food that was not palatable, safe, or appetizing. Findings include: 1. The 7/18/24 posted lunch menu included breaded pork cutlet, au gratin potatoes, cauliflower and the alternative menu was sloppy joes, cheddar mash potatoes and broccoli. The desert was ice cream. On 7/18/24 at 1:20 PM two sample plates were received. The first plate included minced and moist textured sloppy joes, mashed potatoes and gravy and broccoli. The second sample plate included easy to chew textured au gratin potatoes and cauliflower. The au gratin potatoes had crunchy pieces of dried potatoes, the moist and minced broccoli was cold with pieces that were firm to chew, the ice cream was melted and the milk was served warm. On 7/18/24 at 1:27 PM Staff 5 (Certified Dietary Manager) acknowledged the au gratin potatoes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sanitation processes were followed for 1 of 1 observed kitchen. This placed residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings include: A 7/2024 Dishwasher Temperature Log revealed a low-temperature dishwasher was monitored from 7/1/24 through 7/14/24, but with no evidence chemical concentration levels were documented. On 7/15/24 at 10:02 AM Staff 44 (Dietary Aide) was observed loading dishes into a low-temperature dishwasher that used chlorine to sanitize dishes. Staff 44 stated she cleaned dishes routinely, monitored the wash and rinse temperatures daily, but was never instructed to monitor the chemical concentration of the dish machine. On 7/15/24 at 10:17 AM Staff 45 (Dietary Services Manager) acknowledged she was aware the dish machine chemical concentration was to be monitored with the use of chemical test strips, which did not occur, and relied on monthly dish machine inspections by the chemical supplier to ensure the dish machine operated correctly. On 7/15/24 at 10:55 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide a clean homelike environment for 7 of 10 sampled residents (#s 6, 19, 27, 29, 37, 46 and 58) and 1 of 2 halls (North) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for an unclean and unhomelike environment. Findings include: 1. Resident 19 admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with diagnosis including reduced mobility. On 7/15/24 at 10:41 AM approximately 50 dents with black marks were observed on the floor at the foot of Resident 19's bed. Resident 19's roommate mentioned ongoing cleaning efforts by housekeeping that did not remove the marks. Additionally, in the bathroom, there were two gray substance lines, each approximately four inches by 12 inches on an aged and dingy floor. On 7/19/24 at 8:00 AM Staff 19 (Maintenance Lead) confirmed completion of some work was needed near the toilet and acknowledged flooring damage. 2. Resident 58 admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with diagnosis including end-of-life care. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents for 1 of 8 sampled residents (#16) and 2 of 2 halls (North and 2nd South) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. A review of Council Minutes revealed the following: -4/29/24 Staff were overworked. Staff left a resident unattended during care resulting in the resident being stuck in the bathroom. Another resident was left in the shower for an extended period. Staff checked on one resident in a room but not their roommate. Call light response times were too long while residents were in the bathroom. -5/29/24 staff lacked the time to spend with residents and had poor attitudes. Call lights went unanswered for 20 minutes or more. Staff did not assist each other. If a staff member was not assigned to a resident, they did not answer their call light. On 7/15/24 the following interviews occurred: -8:46 AM, Resident 36…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to staff a registered nurse for eight consecutive hours per day 7 days per week for 34 out of 126 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet assessment needs. Findings include: Review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Report sheets from 1/1/24 through 1/28/24, 2/3/24 through 2/25/24, 3/10/24 through 3/24/24, 5/1/24 through 5/30/24, 6/14/24 through 6/30/24, 7/1/24 through 7/14/24 revealed the facility did not have RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on the following days: 1/20/24, 1/21/24, 1/28/24, 2/3/24, 2/4/24, 2/5/24, 2/7/24, 2/8/24, 2/10/24, 2/11/24, 2/13/24, 2/16/24, 2/17/24, 2/18/24, 2/19/24, 2/21/24, 2/23/24, 3/10/24, 3/11/24, 3/12/24, 3/13/24, 3/14/24, 3/15/24, 3/16/24, 3/17/24, 3/18/24, 3/19/24, 3/20/24, 3/21/24, 3/22/24, 3/23/24, 3/24/24, 6/30/24 and 7/3/24. In an interview on 7/19/24 at 11:48 AM Staff 1 (Administrator), Staff 2 (DNS), Staff 3 (Regional Support Lead), and Staff 23 (Regional Nurse Consultant) stated they thought RN coverage was better than what was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to post accurate and complete staffing information for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents and visitors at risk for incomplete and inaccurate staffing information. Findings include: On 7/15/24 at 9:41 AM the DCSDR (Direct Care Staff Daily Report) was observed posted on the wall. The DCSDR did not have any staff hours documented for LPNs or CNAs. On 7/16/24 at 7:38 AM and 8:25 AM the 7/15/24 DCSDR was still posted on the wall. On 7/17/24 at 7:57 AM the DCSDR was observed on posted on the wall with no LPN or CNAs documented on the form. On 7/17/24 at 11:53 AM Witness 1 (Staff) stated in the last few months the nurses were informed to just fill in the staff numbers without staff hours and the administration would complete the form the next day. On 7/18/24 at 7:51 AM and 9:11 AM the 7/18/24 DCSDR was observed posted on the wall with no LPN or CNA hours documented for all three shifts. On 7/18/24 at 8:40 AM a text message was received from Witness 1 which was a photo of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were free from pests for 1 of 10 sampled residents (#36) and 1 of 3 dining rooms reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for pest infestation. Findings include: Resident 36 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and foot ulcer. A 7/6/24 Work Order indicated there was an excessive amount of flies in the main area and resident rooms in the south part of the building. A 7/13/24 at 6:10 AM SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) Change of Condition note indicated on 7/13/24 Staff 26 (RN) reported at 5:00 AM to Staff 27 (LPN) Resident 36 had maggots (fly larva) on her/his bed that came from her/wound dressing. Resident 36 was transported to the hospital. On 7/15/24 at 12:30 PM five flies were observed in the resident dining room around residents' food. Residents continued to swat the flies away from their meals. On 7/16/24 at 8:50 AM Resident 36 stated around 7/4/24 she/he complained about flies in her/his room that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 5 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) reviewed for evidence of in-service training. This placed residents at risk for lack of competent staff. Findings include: A review of the facility's staff training records revealed the following: - Staff 6 (CNA), hired 5/30/22, had 15 minutes of documented training from 5/30/23 through 5/30/24. - Staff 7 (CNA), hired 6/20/19, had one hour of documented training from 6/20/23 through 6/20/24. - Staff 8 (CNA), hired 5/14/20, had two hours of documented training from 5/14/23 through 5/14/24. -Staff 9 (CNA), hired 3/23/21, had 7.25 hours of documented training from 3/23/23 through 3/23/24 -Staff 10 (CNA) hired 6/16/21, had 15 minutes of documented training from 6/16/23 through 6/16/24. In an interview on 7/19/24 at 12:03 PM Staff 1 (Administrator), Staff 2 (DNS), Staff 3 (Regional Support Lead), and Staff 23 (Regional Nurse Consultant) stated staff were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide risk and benefit information related to the use of antipsychotic medications to residents/responsible parties prior to administration for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for medications. This placed resident responsible parties at risk for lack of informed consent. Findings include: Resident 10 admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnosis including dementia. A review of the 5/2024 MAR revealed instruction staff to administer Haloperidol (an antipsychotic used to treat mental and mood disorders) four times a day for anxiety and agitation with a start date of 5/9/24. The admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident 10 had a BIMS score of 10, which indicated the resident was moderately impaired cognitively. A review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed Witness 2 (Family Member) was Resident 10's responsible party. A review of a Consent for use of Psychotropic Medication Therapy dated 5/16/24 revealed Resident 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#15) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 15 admitted to the facility in 11/2021 with diagnoses including dementia. On 7/18/24 at 1:30 PM Witness 6 (family member) stated the facility scheduled a care conference on 5/27/24. Witness 6 stated the care conference did not occur and no one contacted her to reschedule. On 7/18/24 at 3:01 PM Staff 15 (LPN Assistant RCM) confirmed Resident 15 had a care conference scheduled on 5/27/24. Staff 15 stated on 5/27/24 Witness 6 came down to the social services office to inquire about the scheduled care conference. Staff 15 stated she spoke with Witness 6 and Witness 6 had no concerns. Staff 15 confirmed Resident 15 was not in attendance. On 7/18/24 at 3:09 PM Staff 33 (Social Service Coordinator) stated on 5/27/24 Witness 6 came to her office to inquire about the scheduled care conference. Staff 33 stated she spoke with Witness 6 and Witness 6 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to include a resident in shower schedule decisions for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#36) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for lack of independent choices. Findings include: Resident 36 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and a foot ulcer. A 5/22/24 revised care plan indicated Resident 36 required two staff to assist with transfers and was dependent on staff with dressing. A 6/25/24 Census for Resident 36 indicated a room move. On 7/16/24 at 9:09 AM a communication board in Resident 36's room indicated her/his shower days were Monday and Thursday. Resident 36 stated the schedule for her/his showers were recently changed without a conversation with the resident. Resident 36 stated the current shower schedule interferred with her/his weekly medical appointment which was not acceptable. On 7/18/24 at 5:11 PM Staff 28 (LPN-Resident Care Manager) stated when Resident 36 moved to a new room her/his shower scheduled automatically changed. Staff 28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify provider of CBG check and orthostatic blood pressure refusals for 1 of 5 sampled residents (# 17) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 17 admitted to the facility in 9/2019 with diagnoses including diabetes. A review of Resident 17's Physician Orders revealed a 9/26/23 order to check her/his CBG every Tuesday morning and a 5/11/22 order to check her/his orthostatic blood pressure (blood pressure check when laying down, sitting and standing) every month. A review of Resident 17's 5/2024 MAR revealed she/he refused CBG checks on 5/21/24 and 5/28/24 and she/he refused orthostatic blood pressures on 5/12/24. A review of Resident 17's 6/2024 MAR revealed she/he refused CBG checks on 6/4/24, 6/11/24, 6/18/24 and 6/25/24 and she/he refused orthostatic blood pressures on 6/12/24. A review of Resident 17's MAR from 7/1/24 through 7/18/24 revealed she/he refused CBG checks on 7/2/24, 7/9/24 and 7/16/24 and there was no evidence of documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 1 resident (#46) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include Resident 46 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder) and anxiety disorder. The 4/5/24 admission MDS indicated Resident 46 had a BIMS of 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. The 4/1/24 care plan indicated Resident 46 was on behavior monitoring related to a history of PTSD, depression, and anxiety. Resident 46's triggers for PTSD included: -overwhelmed -feeling loss of control -upset with situation On 6/13/24 a public complaint was received which indicated Resident 46 was being harassed and intimidated by Resident 29. The facility was not doing enough to keep her/him safe and it was an ongoing issue. Witness 8 (Complainant) stated on 6/2/24 Resident 29 came into the dining room and was disruptive. Resident 46 politely asked her/him to to not be disruptive while they were having their meal. Resident 29…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#46) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 46 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder) and anxiety disorder. The 4/5/24 admission MDS indicated Resident 46 had a BIMS of 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. The 4/1/24 care plan indicated Resident 46 was on behavior monitoring related to a history of PTSD, depression, and anxiety. Resident 46's triggers for PTSD included: -overwhelmed -feeling loss of control -upset with situation On 6/13/24 a public complaint was received which indicated Resident 46 was being harassed and intimidated by Resident 29. The facility was not doing enough to keep her/him safe and it was an ongoing issue. Witness 8 (Complainant) stated on 6/2/24 Resident 29 came into the dining room and was disruptive. Resident 46 politely asked her/him to to not be disruptive while they were having their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise care plan interventions for 3 of 13 sampled residents (#s 10, 17 and 24) reviewed for ADLS, medications, positioning and mobility. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 10 admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including a broken arm. The admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident 10 had a BIMS score of 10, which indicated the resident was moderately impaired cognitively. Resident 10 was at risk for contracture to the left fingers. A review of a TAR for 7/2024 instructed staff to soak and wash her/his hand in warm water every shift and apply a hand brace every day and evening shift for the hand contracture with a start date of 6/11/24. Review of Resident 10's current care plan revealed no documentation related to the hand contracture. On 7/19/24 at 7:54 AM Staff 16 (CMA) stated she was the one who started soaking Resident 10's hand as her/his hand was crusty and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received required assistance with ADLs for 3 of 6 sampled residents (#s 16, 24, and 40) reviewed for ADLs. This placed resident at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 16 admitted to the facility in 2/2017 with diagnoses including a fractured pelvis. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident 16 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required substantial to maximal assistance with transfers related to toileting. A review of Resident 16's care plan revised 7/5/21 revealed Resident 16 had bladder incontinence. Interventions included to notify staff of toileting needs. Resident 16 was occasionally incontinent before reaching the bathroom and required one-person assistance for toilet transfers. On 5/30/24 the State Survey Agency received a public complaint which indicated staff were busy with dinner one night the week of 5/20/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess and provide meaningful activities for 2 of 2 sampled resident (#s 36 and 42) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for lack of social interaction. Findings include: 1. Resident 36 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and a foot ulcer. A 5/21/24 admission MDS revealed Resident 36 was cognitively intact and it was very important to choose activities which were important to her/him. A 5/28/24 Activity Profile indicated Resident 36 desired group activities which included exercise. A 5/29/24 care plan indicated Resident 36 wanted staff to discuss her/his likes and dislikes related to activities. The 7/15/24 [CNA] Tasks: Activity revealed Resident 36 did not engage in any group or one on one activities during the previous 30 days. On 7/16/24 at 8:42 AM Resident 36 was observed in bed and stated she/he was bored and there were no exercise options presented. On 7/17/24 at 3:09 PM Staff 37 (Activities Director) stated Resident 36 had no interest in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement bowel care, notify the physician and follow physician orders for 2 of 8 sampled residents (#s 17 and 33) reviewed for skin, change of condition, and medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 17 admitted to the facility in 9/2019 with diagnoses including diabetes. A review of Resident 17's medical record revealed 5/7/24 orders to increase Lisinopril (a medication used to treat high blood pressure). A 6/20/24 Progress Note stated Resident 17's provider wrote orders on 5/7/24 to increase her/his Lisinopril and the order was not entered into Resident 17 chart. On 7/17/24 at 1:31 PM Staff 25 (LPN) stated she discovered the pharmacy sent Lisinopril 7.5 mg, but the order in Resident 17's chart was for Lisinopril 5 mg. Staff 25 stated she checked the orders written by the provider and discovered Resident 17's Lisinopril was increased from 5 mg daily to 7.5 mg daily on 5/7/24. Staff 25 stated she was unsure when the pharmacy sent the correct dose. On 7/17/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to replace hearing aids in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#40) reviewed for sensory needs. This placed residents at risk for a decline in hearing and impaired communication. Findings include: Resident 40 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including dementia and depression. A 5/17/24 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 40's hearing was adequate and she/he was assessed for the use of hearing aids or a hearing appliance. A 6/6/24 revised care plan indicated Resident 40 was to wear hearing aids in both ears in order to address her/his mild hearing deficit. On 7/16/24 at 9:24 AM Resident 40 was observed seated at a dining room table with no hearing aid in either ear. Staff 29 (CNA) stated Resident 40 did not use her/his hearing aids because they were broken for the last three to four months, and the resident was on a list to have her/his hearing aids repaired. On 7/17/24 at 10:07 AM Staff 27 (LPN) stated Resident 40 had no hearing aids since the resident moved to a new hall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer treatments and care plans for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 1 and 3) reviewed for pressure ulcers and incontinent care. This placed residents at risk for pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 7/2021 with diagnoses including stroke. A 5/31/24 Weekly Skin Audit revealed Resident 3 had new skin irregularities with significant redness to the peri area and sacral (large, triangular bone at the base of the spine) area. There was no documentation indicating the physician was informed. Review of the 6/2024 TAR instructed staff to conduct bi-weekly skin checks and document in the assessment tab which was discontinued on 6/16/24. The TAR indicated the task was completed on 6/2/24, 6/5/24, 6/12/24, and 6/16/24. On 6/13/24 it referred the reader to notes. There were no corresponding assessments found in the assessment tab for those dates. A 6/12/24 Order Note revealed the weekly skin check was not completed as it was completed on 6/9/24. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free from accident hazards for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#66) reviewed for accidents, and respond to changes in condition in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#65) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for injury and untimely care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 65 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including leg fracture. A progress note dated 12/15/23 at 5:33 PM indicated Resident 65 had a recent fall and her/his right lower extremity was swollen, bruised, and and painful. A STAT (immediate) x-ray was ordered to rule out injury. A progress note dated 12/16/23 at 2:41 AM indicated the x-ray revealed Resident 65 had a right ankle fracture. A progress note dated 12/18/23 at 9:40 AM indicated Staff 41 (LPN) sent a message to the physician that Resident 65 had a fractured ankle. The physician replied the x-ray was noted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate catheter care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#14) reviewed urinary catheter. This placed residents at risk for urinary infections. Findings include: Resident 14 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease and displacement of a nephrostomy catheter (tube that diverts urine from kidney). A 6/14/23 Discharge Summary indicated Resident 14 had a nephrostomy tube placed. An 10/13/23 through 3/13/24 physician order indicated to cover Resident 14's nephrostomy tube site and change the bandage daily. The 4/2024 TAR indicated to ensure catheter straps were attached to the lower left extremely for the nephrostomy bag. Treatments were discontinued on 4/30/24. A 5/9/24 physician order indicated to change Resident 14's nephrostomy tube dressing, remove the old dressing, cleanse, dry and apply a new dressing. A 7/2/24 revised care plan indicated Resident 14 had a left nephrostomy related to end stage kidney disease, the goal was to have no infections, and interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain orders for oxygen for 2 or 2 sampled residents (#s 30 and 63) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for unmet respiratory needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 30 admitted to the facility in 4/2022 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease which causes restricted airflow and breathing problems). A review of Resident 30's care plan revealed a 12/21/23 care plan for oxygen use as needed. A 7/18/24 review of Resident 30's medical record revealed no evidence of a current order for oxygen use. On 7/18/24 at 11:49 AM Staff 17 (CNA) stated Resident 30 used oxygen as needed almost daily. On 7/18/24 at 3:37 PM Staff 32 (LPN RCM) stated Resident 30 used oxygen as needed when she/he was short of breath. Staff 32 confirmed Resident 30 had no orders for oxygen use. 2. Resident 63 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). A physician order dated 6/2/24 indicated Resident 63…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received proper dialysis care and services after dialysis for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#55) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for dialysis complications. Findings include: Resident 55 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including end stage kidney disease. On 7/17/24 at 12:37 PM Resident 55 was observed to have a fistula (surgically created connection between an artery and a vein to provide access for dialysis) in her/his left arm. Resident 55 stated she/he had dialysis three times a week, when she/he returned staff were not checking her/his access site for thrill and bruit (two ways to check for good blood flow in a dialysis fistula). The 2/7/24 care plan for dialysis indicated the resident had dialysis three times a week, staff were to monitor the access site for infection and bleeding. Staff were to also obtain and document weights. Resident 55 had six weights documented in the electronic record from 2/7/24 through 6/29/24. No evidence was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 1 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#9) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of competent staff. Findings include: A review of the facility's performance review records revealed the following: -Staff 9 (CNA) was hired on 3/23/21, the provided performance review was dated 4/30/22. In an interview on 7/19/24 at 12:02 PM Staff 1 (Administrator), Staff 2 (DNS), Staff 3 (Regional Support Lead), and Staff 23 (Regional Nurse Consultant) stated the missed review occurred during a staffing transition.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to address pharmacy recommendations for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 10 and 17) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include 1. Resident 10 admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnosis including dementia. The 5/31/24 and 6/28/24 Note to Attending Physician Prescriber indicated Resident 10 was prescribed trazodone (an antidepressant to treat depression) PRN and promethazine (an antihistamine to prevent and treat nausea and vomiting) for agitation, both limited to 14 days. The note requested either discontinuation or a rationale for extended use, but lacked the physician's signature, date, or clinical justification. The 7/2024 MAR instructed staff to administer trazodone every 12 hours as needed for agitation starting on 5/9/24. The MAR also indicated to administer Promethazine every four hours as needed for agitation, nausea and vomiting starting 5/8/24. In an interview on 7/19/24 at 11:48 AM Staff 1 (Administrator), Staff 2 (DNS), Staff 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor anticoagulant medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#27) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of medications. Findings include: Resident 27 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including stroke and blood clot. A 3/28/24 signed physician order indicated Resident 27 received Apixaban (anticoagulant medication used to treat and prevent blood clots). There was no monitoring in the resident's electronic record for adverse side effects for Apixaban. On 7/18/24 at 9:41 AM Staff 28 (RCM-LPN) acknowledged there was no monitoring for adverse side effects of Apixaban in Resident 27's electronic record.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to consistently monitor residents on psychotropic medications and ensure residents did not receive unnecessary medications for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#10, 17 and 27) reviewed for psychotropic medications. This placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings include: 1. Resident 10 admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including dementia. A review of 7/2024 MAR revealed Resident 10 was administered haloperidol (antipsychotic medication) daily. A review of monitors revealed no daily documentation of daily monitoring for antipsychotic side effects. In an interview on 7/19/24 at 12:43 PM Staff 1 (Administrator), Staff 2 (DNS), Staff 3 (Regional Support Lead), and Staff 23 (Regional Nurse Consultant) stated the expectation was to monitor daily for adverse side effects. 2. Resident 17 admitted to the facility in 8/2019 with diagnoses including narcissistic personality disorder (a mental health condition in which people have an unreasonably high sense of their own…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' food preferences were honored for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#27 ) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 27 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including malnutrition and diabetes. Resident 27's dietary card had lactose intolerant listed in two places. On 7/17/24 at 1:34 PM Resident 27 was observed to have a glass of milk on her/his meal tray. On 7/18/24 at 1:12 PM Resident 27 was observed to have a glass of milk on her/his meal tray. Resident 27 became angry regarding the milk and asked staff to remove the milk immediately. On 7/18/24 at 1:29 PM Staff 28 (RCM-LPN) acknowledged the resident's dietary card indicated she/he was lactose intolerant and should not receive milk.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control standards for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#30) and 2 of 2 unsampled residents (#s 6 and 11) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for exposure and contraction of infectious diseases. Findings include. 1. Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including sleep apnea (sleep related breathing disorder). On 7/16/24 at 9:55 AM Resident 6's CPAP mask was observed under her/his pillow against her/his mattress. On 7/17/24 at 1: 53 PM Resident 6's CPAP mask was observed resting on her/his bedrail. On 7/18/24 at 9:33 AM Resident 6's CPAP mask was observed on the floor. On 7/19/24 at 10:50 AM Staff 27 (LPN) stated Resident 6's CPAP mask should be stored in a sanitary manner. 2. Resident 11 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including sleep apnea (sleep related breathing disorder). On 7/16/24 at 9:55 AM Resident 11's CPAP mask was observed on her/his nightstand. On 7/17/24 at 1:53 PM Resident 11's CPAP mask was observed hanging…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident care needs for 2 of 2 halls (200 and 400) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for delayed and unmet care needs. Findings include: On 3/22/23 the facility provided a list of residents who: -Required assistance or were dependent with eating: three, -Required two-person assistance with a mechanical lift: 16, -Required two-person assistance with sit-to-stand: three, -Required two-person assistance with bathing: three, -Were fully dependent on staff for bathing: three A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports revealed 60 days out of 150 days when the state minimum CNA staffing ratios were not met for one or more shifts. Interviews with residents revealed the following concerns: -On 3/20/23 at 10:27 AM Resident 45 stated the facility was often short staffed and call light response times could take greater than 30 minutes to answer. Resident 45 stated because of long call light response times she/he sat in a soiled brief which burned her/his skin,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a comprehensive dementia assessment for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 2 and 47) reviewed for dementia. This place residents at risk for unassessed needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including dementia. The 8/28/22 Annual MDS Dementia comprehensive assessment indicated Resident 2 was unable to answer a lot of questions, struggled with the answers and had some dementia. Resident 2 believed her/his memory was due to old age. No further information was provided related to Resident 2's history of dementia, extent of the resident's cognitive loss, mood and behaviors or medical issues that may impact cognition. On 3/23/23 at 9:11 AM Staff 10 (Social Service Director) stated social services completed the dementia MDS assessments. Staff 10 confirmed Resident 2's dementia assessment was not comprehensive. 2. Resident 47 readmitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including dementia. The 12/18/22 Annual MDS Cognitive Loss/Dementia CAA indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide diabetic nail care for 1 of 4 sampled residents (# 51) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of nail care. Findings include: Resident 51 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including diabetes. On 3/20/23 at 1:12 PM and 3/24/23 at 10:00 AM Resident 51 was observed to have long fingernails. Review of Resident 51's current physician orders revealed no orders for diabetic nail care and the 3/2023 TAR revealed no indication diabetic nail care was being completed. On 3/24/23 at 10:03 AM Staff 24 (CNA) stated Resident 51 was diabetic and nursing staff were to complete nail care. On 3/24/23 at 10:10 AM Resident 51 stated her/his nails were long. On 3/24/23 @ 10:11 AM Staff 8 (Resident Care Manager/LPN) stated nursing staff were to monitor diabetic nail care weekly and it was to be documented on the TAR. Staff 2 acknowledged Resident 51's nails were long and there were no orders in place and no diabetic nail care on the TAR.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper food temperatures for 3 of 9 sampled residents (#s 33, 46 and 218) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for cold food and impaired nutrition. Findings include: On 3/20/23 at 10:30 AM Resident 46 stated the food was not warm enough and was always cold. On 3/20/23 at 10:30 AM Resident 218 reported the food was not always warm. On 3/20/23 at 12:59 PM and 3/22/23 at 10:52 AM Resident 33 reported her/his breakfast was the usual, cold eggs, hot cereal and the food is a disaster. On 3/22/23 at 12:30 PM Resident 33 stated the meatloaf served at lunch was good, but not particularly warm. On 3/22/23 at 12:36 PM surveyors sampled a regular textured lunch meal and a mechanical soft/small bites meal. The lunch meals consisted of meatloaf, mashed potatoes, green beans and strawberry shortcake. The surveyors agreed the meatloaf was cool on the regular/small bites tray and cold on the mechanical soft tray. On 3/22/23 at 12:41 PM Staff 4 (Regional Nurse Consultant) sampled the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain the ice machine reviewed for 1 of 1 kitchen. This placed residents at risk for contamination. Findings include: On 3/20/23 at 9:45 AM the inside of the ice machine was observed to have a black mildew substance across the entire trim of the plastic ice dispenser. Water droplets were observed to fall from the dispenser trim onto the ice on the bottom of the ice machine. On 3/20/23 at 9:50 AM Staff 9 (Dietary Manager) stated the ice machine was used for the entire facility. Staff 9 acknowledged the ice machine should not have a visible black mildew substance and the ice machine needed to be cleaned.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$20,303 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $20,303 — penalty dated 2024-06-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVAMERE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRUNS, MAUREEN | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 08/01/2020 |
| HUTCHINSON, JONATHAN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 03/01/2024 |
| KOFSTAD, MARY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/13/2024 |
| SIMPSON, ANDREW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 06/01/2024 |
| AVAMERE HEALTH SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2017 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385168. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.