Richmond Beach Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 153 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 131 beds and averages 98.6 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe transportation was provided for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 45), reviewed for transportation to an appointment in the facility van. This failure caused harm when the wheelchair tipped over causing ongoing pain in Resident 45's left shoulder, arm, and hand. The failure to ensure the straps attached to the floor of the van were securely attached to the wheelchair before/after appointment transportation placed other residents at risk for injury and harm. Findings included . Review of Resident 45's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating Resident 45 was cognitively intact. Resident 45 was identified as requiring extensive assist of two person for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, and required a wheelchair for mobility. Review of Resident 45's medical diagnoses included low back pain and chronic pain. The diagnosis of left shoulder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse reporting. The failure to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Agency placed the residents at risk for repeated incidents and unidentified abuse.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, [Facility] Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property, dated September 2022, showed, It is the policy of this facility that all suspected, alleged, or actual cases of resident abuse.shall be thoroughly and completely investigated and reported according to Federal and/or State regulations. It showed that Sexual abuse means non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. It further showed that Mandated reporters are to immediately report all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency and all other required agencies.when they have reasonable suspicion of abuse.has occurred.Resident 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure chlorine test strips (used to measure the concentration of free available chlorine in sanitizing solutions) were not expired in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen, reviewed for dinnerware sanitization and storage. This failure placed the residents at risk for unsanitary dining conditions and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled Dishwashing Machine Use, revised in March 2010, showed, Food Service staff required to operate the dishwashing machine will be trained in all steps of dishwashing machine use by the supervisor or a designee proficient in all aspects of proper use and sanitation.During a joint observation and interview on 02/23/2026 at 8:33 AM, Staff R, Culinary Aide, checked the dishwasher temperature and the chemical sanitation Parts Per Million (ppm - unit of measure for concentration) range. Staff R used [Brand name] Chlorine Test Paper. Staff R stated that the test strip results should be between 50 ppm to 100 ppm. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a system that ensured the right to file grievances anonymously for 5 of 8 residents (Resident 26, 37, 10, 100 & 104), reviewed for grievances. This failure placed the residents at risk for unresolved concerns, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Grievance Policy, revised in January 2017, showed, Grievance may be filed orally or in writing and with the right to file anonymously. Review of the facility's undated document titled, Resident Grievance/Complaint Procedures, did not show documentation of a system to file grievances anonymously. Review of the facility's undated form titled, Grievance Communication Form, did not show documentation of a system to file grievances anonymously. Observation and record review on 02/19/2026 at 10:24 AM, showed an undated document titled, Grievance/Complaint Procedures, in an enclosed glass bulletin board outside the administrator's office. Review of the undated document showed, [Grievance] Forms…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store the Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP - a therapy that pumps air into the lungs through the nose or nose and mouth that keeps the airway open) mask when not in use, administer CPAP as ordered, and monitor oxygen (O2) saturation (the amount of oxygen in the blood) for 3 of 6 residents (Resident 52, 2 &104), reviewed for respiratory care. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, respiratory infections, and related complications.Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, CPAP/BiPAP [Bilevel Positive Airway Support-used to assist breathing by delivering air through a mask that covers the nose, mouth, or both] Support, dated July 2025, showed the purpose of CPAP/BiPAP was to improve O2 levels present in the blood in residents with OSA [Obstructive Sleep Apnea - a sleep disorder that is marked by pauses in breathing of ten seconds or more during sleep and causes unrestful sleep] .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document medication administration in accordance with professional standards for 4 of 6 residents (Residents 46, 90, 29 & 93), reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed the residents at risk for medication errors, negative outcomes, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, revised in April 2019, showed, the individual administering the medication initials the resident's MAR [Medication Administration Record] on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones.RESIDENT 46Review of Resident 46's February 2026 MAR showed they had orders for the following medications:- Cranberry (supplement), 1 (one) tablet- Senna (stool softener), 2 (two) tablets- Lactulose (stool softener) oral solution, 15 milliliters (a unit of measurement)- Excedrin (pain reliever), 2 tablets- Aripiprazole (mood stabilizer), 1 tablet- Lamotrigine (mood stabilizer), 1 tablet- Oxycodone (pain reliever), 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed by 4 of 12 staff (Staff W, K, O & P) and for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 29 & 44), reviewed for infection control. The failure to properly transport clean clothes, use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-face shield/goggles, gowns) before entering a droplet precaution (measure taken to prevent spread of germs transmitted when a person coughs, sneezes, talks or breaths) room and during wound care, disinfect a glucometer (a device used to measure blood sugar level) and pen injector (device used to inject Liraglutide [medication that helps regulate blood sugar levels]), and ensure a urine-filled urinal was not placed next to a resident's meal tray, placed the residents, visitors, and staff at risk for infection and related complications.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated October 2025, showed, An infection prevention and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an informed consent explaining the risks/benefits for psychotropic medication (alters mood, perception, and behavior) was completed prior to medication administration for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 12), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about medications prior to administration.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, revised in July 2022, showed, Residents (and/or representatives) have the right to decline treatment with psychotropic medications. The policy further showed, The staff and physician will review with the resident/representative the risks related to not taking the medication as well as appropriate alternatives.Review of Resident 12's February 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed an as needed (PRN) order for lorazepam (an antianxiety) medication was administered.Review of Resident 12's January…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were evaluated and assessed, and/or a physician order was obtained for safe administration of medication for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 92 & 64), reviewed for self-administration of medication. This failure placed the residents at risk for inaccurate and unsafe medication administration, adverse side effects, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, revised in April 2019, showed, Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do safely.RESIDENT 92Review of Resident 92's Electronic Health Records (EHR) under evaluations tab from 01/24/2025 to 02/19/2026 showed no documentation to indicate that Resident 92 had a self-administration of medication evaluation.Review of a physician orders printed on 02/18/2026 showed no documentation to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was provided during dining observations for 2 of 10 residents (Residents 89 & 47), reviewed for dining. The failure to ensure licensed nurses refrained from administration of medications during resident meals placed the residents at risk for a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity, revised in October 2025, showed, Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times.RESIDENT 89Observation on 02/17/2026 at 12:54 PM, showed multiple residents were eating their meals in the dining room. Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse, entered the dining room and mixed Resident 89's medication with yogurt. Resident 89 took their medication in the dining room.An additional observation on 02/19/2026 at 1:03 PM, showed multiple residents were eating their meals in the dining room. Staff K administered Resident 89 their medication in the dining room.RESIDENT 47Observation on 02/17/2026 at 1:04 PM showed Staff K administered Resident 47 their medication in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) was completed timely for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 107), reviewed for significant change in condition. The failure to complete an SCSA timely placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.20.1, dated October 2025, showed that a SCSA is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice (compassionate care provided to individuals who are in the final stages of a terminal illness) program or changes hospice providers and remains a resident at the nursing home. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD - observation period over which the resident's condition or status is captured by the MDS and ends at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$44,753 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $44,753 — penalty dated 2023-08-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVAMERE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 67 rows in the source record cover these 37 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA