Avamere At Pacific Ridge
3625 East B Street, Tacoma, WA 98404 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 102 certified beds · (253) 475-2507 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $57,783 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-17)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.9% | 14.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.4% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 1.0% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.1% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 2.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.2% | 17.2% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.7% | 12.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.4% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.2% | 22.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 47.9% | 15.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 59.0% | 82.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 35.4% | 19.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 30.3% | 13.4% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.8%CMS range 24.1–57.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 8.2–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 75.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.73 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 65.4 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.40 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
69 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-04-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when medications were not administered per physician orders for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for medication management. Resident 1, who was newly placed on an anticoagulant (blood thinning) medication to treat multiple blood clots, experienced harm when the facility failed to administer the medication resulting in pain, increased swelling, and required inpatient treatment at the hospital. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications, unintended health consequences, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .The facility's policy entitled Medication and Treatment Orders, approved 11/2025, stated that orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing, and that orders for anticoagulants will be prescribed only with appropriate clinical and laboratory monitoring, and that the attending physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enteral nutrition (the delivery of nutrients through a tube feeding [TF] directly into the stomach or small intestine) was administered in accordance with physician's orders and professional standards of practice for 4 of 4 residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, & 4), reviewed for TF management. Resident 1 experienced harm when they were found positioned in bed at a 10 degree angle while actively receiving TF in respiratory distress and had tube feeding formula coming from their mouth requiring transfer to the hospital where they were diagnosed with aspiration pneumonia (a lung infection that occurs when you inhale liquid into your lungs). Failure of the facility to have a system in place which ensured the amount of enteral formula (liquid food products) a resident received was reconciled with the amount they were ordered to receive, accurately record the amount of enteral formula and water flushes administered, label/date and discard tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required care planned supervision to prevent accidents/falls for 3 of 5 sample residents (Resident 1, 2 & 3) reviewed for two person assists with transfers. Resident 1 experienced harm when they received care without two staff assistance which resulted in a fall, hospitalization and diagnosis of a traumatic brain injury (TBI). This failure placed residents at risk for falls, injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> According to the 07/22/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 1 required substantial to maximal assistance with standing, transfers, toileting hygiene, and was dependent for lower body dressing. Review of the Self-Care Performance Deficit Care Plan (CP), dated 07/16/2024, showed Resident 1 required extensive assistance of two staff to dress, for toileting and with transfers. Review of the Nursing Assistant documentation, dated 09/05/2024 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required care planned supervision to prevent accidents/falls for 3 of 5 residents (Resident 1, 2 and 3) reviewed for two person assists with transfers. Resident 1 experienced harm when they received care while in bed without two staff assistance which resulted in a fall and shoulder fracture. This failure placed residents at risk for falls, injury and and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> According to the 07/03/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 1 was alert and oriented, was dependent on staff to roll left and right in bed, dependent on staff for a chair to bed transfers and had one non injury fall since the previous MDS. Review of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan (CP), showed Resident 1 was totally dependent on staff for repositioning and turning in bed, two person maximum assist (initiated 12/13/2023). Review of the risk of falls CP revised showed Resident 1 had a non injury fall from the bed on 12/24/2023 and was a two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently maintain the medication refrigerator temperature logs in 2 of 2 medication rooms (The 100/200 hall and 300/400 hall medication rooms) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medications. Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, dated 2007, showed medications that required refrigeration, were to be kept in the refrigerator between 36 and 46 Fahrenheit (F, temperature scale) with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring. It showed, A temperature log or tracking mechanism is maintained to verify that temperature has remained within accepted limits. The temperature of any refrigerator that stores vaccines should be monitored and recorded twice daily. <100/200 Hall Medication Room>Observation on 04/22/2026 at 8:04 AM with Staff E, Resident Care Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (RCM/LPN), of the medication room refrigerator located in the 100/200 hall medication room showed various…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor potential adverse side effects (ASE) related to the use of psychoactive (affecting the mind) medications for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 2, 11, 14, and 69) when reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Failure to have adequate indications or diagnosis for psychoactive medication use for Resident 2, consistent orthostatic blood pressure monitoring for Resident 11, and to conduct/obtain abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS) assessment for the use of an antipsychotic medication (a psychoactive medication that affects a person's mental status) for Residents 14 and 69, placed residents at risk of medical complications, unidentified presence and severity of AIM ASE, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Resident 2 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction (stroke caused by reduced blood flow in the brain),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure sharps containers (containers to safely store used sharp, medical equipment, e.g. used needles) were regularly emptied and sharps were inaccessible to residents for 2 of 4 sampled sharps containers (200 and 300 hall) reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed residents at risk of access to used medical equipment, transmission of dangerous infections, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Observation on 04/24/2026 at 10:18 AM showed the 200 hall medication cart had a sharps container affixed to the side. Observation showed the sharps container contained used needles which were visible/assessable and were stacked flush to the rim. Observation showed the spinning part which allowed the needles to fall to the bottom of the container and be inaccessible was not visible due to the amount of needles stacked atop it. Observation on 04/24/2026 at 10:20 AM showed the 300 hall medication cart had a sharps container affixed to the side and a few needles were visible. Observation showed the spinning part did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide non-pharmacological interventions (NPI, health interventions/approaches used instead of medication) for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 11 and 14) when reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk of receiving unnecessary medications, avoidable medication side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 11 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include fracture of right arm, dementia (decline in cognitive function), diabetes (high blood sugar) and heart failure. Resident 11 was not able to communicate needs. Review of April 2026 medication administration record (MAR) showed Resident 11 was administered acetaminophen (pain medicine) as needed seven times. Review of the acetaminophen order showed Resident 11 was to be offered nonpharmacological interventions prior to administering the pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and educate for influenza and pneumococcal vaccines for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 21 and 10) reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. These failures denied residents the opportunity to make an informed decision regarding receiving immunizations and/or placed the residents at risk for communicable diseases, complications of other medical conditions, hospitalization, and death. Findings included .Review of Resident 21's electronic health record (EHR) showed an admission date of 07/02/2022. There was no documentation that the facility provided education of the risks and benefits of the influenza vaccine for the 2025/2026 season. Review of Resident 10's EHR showed an admission date of 01/10/2026. There was no documentation that the facility provided education of the risks and benefits of the influenza vaccine or the pneumovax vaccine in 2026. During an interview on 04/24/2026 at 11:39 AM, Staff C, Regional Director of Quality Assurance, stated it was their expectation that all residents be offered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Covid-19 (a highly infectious respiratory illness caused by a virus) vaccinations had documented evidence in the medical record that education was provided regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 10 and 7) reviewed for Covid-19 vaccinations. There was no documented evidence that the resident/representative received education and accepted or refused the vaccine. These failures denied the resident/representative the right to make informed decisions and placed residents at risk for adverse health effects of a communicable disease. Findings included .Review of Resident 10's electronic health record (EHR) showed an admission date of 01/10/2026. There was no documentation that the facility provided education of the risks and benefits of the Covid-19 vaccine. Review of Resident 7's EHR showed an admission date of 02/11/2026. There was no documentation that the resident was provided education of the risks and benefits of the Covid-19 vaccine. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents of their right to formulate an advanced directive and failed to periodically review residents' decision to formulate an advanced directive for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 57 and 63) reviewed for advanced directives. This failure placed residents at risk of lacking the ability to appoint someone to make decisions for them when incapacitated and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 57Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 57 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include pressure wound of the lower back, diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), and bipolar disorder (mental health condition characterized by manic highs and depressive lows). Resident 57 was able to make needs known. Review of the Profile page showed Resident 57 was their own responsible party and did not have a power of attorney (someone to make decisions for you when incapacitated) or guardian (someone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, homelike environment for 2 of 17 sampled residents (Residents 10 and 48) reviewed for safe/homelike environment. The facility's failure to ensure Resident 10's damaged wall was repaired and Resident 48's room contained cleanable surfaces placed residents at risk of decreased mood, infection, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 10 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Wernicke's encephalopathy (vitamin B deficiency that leads to confusion and unsteady walking), dementia (a group of symptoms that affects cognition), and delusional disorder (a mental health condition characterized by the presence non-bizarre fixed, false beliefs). Resident 10 was unable to make needs known. Observation on 04/20/2026 at 12:57 PM showed a large, damaged area to the wall above Resident 10's bed which revealed the brown cardboard color…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate, investigate, and resolve a grievance for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 50) reviewed for personal property and grievances. This failure placed the residents at risk for emotional distress and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed that Resident 50 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include high blood pressure, depression, anxiety disorder, and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Resident 50 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 04/20/2026 at 12:37 PM, Resident 50 stated Resident 27 sped up and down the hallway in their wheelchair very fast all day. Resident 50 stated one time Resident 27's wheelchair wheel got caught in their wheelchair but was then able to go around. Resident 50 stated that staff were aware. Review of the facility's Grievance log from November 2025 - April 15, 2026, showed no grievance logged for Resident 50's safety concern…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure injuries of unknown sources were reported to the State Hotline for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 42) when reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk for potential abuse/neglect and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 42 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease (loss of cognitive function), congestive heart failure (when the heart is unable to pump blood efficiently) and anxiety. Resident 42 was able to make needs known. Review of the February 2026 accident and incident log showed an entry dated 02/28/2026 for Resident 42 related to skin. The incident was logged as Small bruises occurring in places generally vulnerable to trauma. The action taken was no further action and was not reported to the State Agency according to the incident log. Review of a 02/28/2026 progress note showed Large bruise to right breast…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 55 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the potential for abuse and/or neglect for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 42) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed Resident 9 at risk for psychosocial harm and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 42 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease (loss of cognitive function), congestive heart failure (when the heart is unable to pump blood efficiently) and anxiety. Resident 42 was able to make needs known. Review of the February 2026 accident and incident log showed an entry dated 02/28/2026 for Resident 42 related to skin. The incident was logged as Small bruises occurring in places generally vulnerable to trauma. The action taken was no further action and was not reported to the State Agency according to the incident log. Review of a 02/28/2026 progress note showed Large bruise to right breast noted.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received a transfer/discharge notice and/or offered a bed hold for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 6 and 12) reviewed for discharge/hospitalization. This failure placed residents at risk of not understanding their reason for transfer, inability to return to their room, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 6 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. During an interview on 04/23/2026 at 1:01 PM, Staff M, admission Director, stated the admission department would follow-up with the resident and/or representative after discharge to the hospital and offer a bed hold and fill out a nursing home transfer or discharge notice and send it to the ombudsman. Review of the nursing home transfer or discharge notice for Resident 6 showed that this notice was not given to Resident 6 or their representative; the area was left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment was accurate for dental conditions or skin conditions for 2 of 17 sampled residents (Residents 35 and 3) reviewed for accuracy of the comprehensive assessment. These failures placed residents at risk of unidentified needs, risk of inadequate plan of care, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 35 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 35 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include spondylosis with myelopathy (compression of the bones in the spine), metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction causing confusion and memory loss), and repeated falls. Resident 35 was able to make needs known. Observation on 04/20/2026 at 1:31 PM showed Resident 35 had damaged lower teeth and no upper teeth. Review of the 5-day minimum data set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], showed Resident 35 was edentulous (lacked all teeth). During an interview on 04/23/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were comprehensively completed to include resident participation for 2 of 17 sampled residents (Residents 12 and 50) when reviewed for care plans. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their input considered in their plan of care, lack of treatments, a decline in clinical condition, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 12 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 12 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of urinary tract infection (UTI) with extended-spectrum B-lactamases (ESBL, enzymes produced by bacteria that are resistant to widely used anti-infective medications), diabetes (high blood sugar), and foot infection. Review of a provider orders dated 04/19/2026 showed Resident 12 was ordered antibiotics (anti-infective) medications for their ESBL and foot infection. Review of the care plan on 04/23/2025 showed Resident 12 did not have focus, goal and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for hearing needs, obtained needed hearing devices, and hearing devices used were included in plans of care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 35) reviewed for communication/sensory. This failure placed the residents at risk of inability to hear, reduced ability to participate in activities, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 35 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include spondylosis with myelopathy (compression of the bones in the spine), metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction causing confusion and memory loss), and repeated falls. Resident 35 was able to make needs known. During an interview and observation on 04/20/2026 at 1:31 PM, Resident 35 stated they used hearing aids at home, and they had left them there before coming to the facility. Observation showed Resident 35 was able to hear questions if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide complete nail care to 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). This failure placed dependent residents at risk for unmet care needs, poor hygiene and diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), polyneuropathy (nerve damage to multiple nerves) and vascular dementia (reduced or blocked blood flow to the brain, leading to cognitive decline and impaired daily functioning). Resident 1 required extensive staff assistance for ADLs. Observation on 04/20/2026 at 11:59 AM showed Resident 1 laid in bed with their feet in pressure relieving boots. Resident 1's toenails on both feet were long, curved and discolored. Review of the provider's orders showed an order for diabetic nail care (nail care performed by a medical professional) weekly on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized activity plan for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 61) reviewed for activities. The failure to develop and implement an activity plan of care, that incorporated residents stated interests, hobbies and preferences, placed the residents at risk for boredom, isolation, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 61 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke, vascular dementia (group of symptoms that affect cognition) and kidney failure. Resident 61 was non-verbal and unable to make needs known. Observations on 04/20/2026 at 9:45 AM, 04/21/2026 at 11:41 AM and 04/22/2026 at 1:46 PM showed Resident 61 laid in bed awake looking at the ceiling or the wall. There was a television in the room, but it was not observed on during any of the observations. Review of Resident 61's care plan (CP) showed the activity focus,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents on a fluid restriction were not provided too much fluid for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 78) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed residents at risk of fluid overload, a decreased clinical status, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record showed Resident 78 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (the lungs cannot adequately transfer oxygen to the blood), chronic systolic congestive heart failure (reduced ability for the heart to contract and pump blood effectively), and end-stage renal disease (kidney function has dropped to less than 10-15% of normal). Resident 78 was able to make needs known. Review of the care plan, initiated 01/12/2026, showed Resident 78 had a fluid restriction of 1800 milliliters (ml, unit of volume), with nursing providing 480 ml twice a day for 965 ml total and dietary providing 835 ml total…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from mental health consultations were followed up on for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 11) reviewed for unnecessary antipsychotic (mind altering) medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for increased side effects, increased behaviors and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include fracture of right arm, dementia (decline in cognitive function), diabetes (high blood sugar) and heart failure. Resident 11 was not able to communicate needs. Review of the significant change minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Resident 11 was receiving antipsychotic medication and had experienced a fall with injury. Review of a provider order dated 03/10/2026 showed Resident 11 was ordered Seroquel 25 mg (mind altering medication) twice a day for a diagnosis of vascular dementia without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were completed to address all aspects of care for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 9) reviewed for dementia care. Failure to develop and implement care plans to address residents' dementia diagnoses and behaviors, placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, avoidable decline, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 9 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Dementia (effects memory), chronic pain, and diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). Resident 9 was rarely/never understood, had a short-term memory problem, made poor decisions and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the EHR showed Resident 9 had no Care Plan (CP) specifically for Focus, Goals or Interventions related to Alzheimer's Dementia. Review of the April 2026 MAR showed no behavior monitoring in place related to Alzheimer's Dementia.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had dental devices to improve resident ability to eat for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 35) reviewed for dental. This failure placed the residents at risk of discomfort, reduced nutritional intake, unintended weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 35 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include spondylosis with myelopathy (compression of the bones in the spine), metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction causing confusion and memory loss), and repeated falls. Resident 35 was able to make needs known. Observation and interview on 04/20/2026 at 1:31 PM showed Resident 35 had damaged lower teeth and no upper teeth. Resident 35 stated they used an upper denture, but it was at their home. Review of the 5-day minimum data set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], showed Resident 35 was edentulous (lacked all teeth). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a wound was fully assessed on admission and weekly as ordered, was monitored, and changes reported as needed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for wound care. This failure placed the resident at risk for pain, deterioration in condition, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .The facility's policy, Wound Management Guidelines, revised 03/31/2025, stated that on admission the admitting nurse or designee would complete a skin evaluation and document the patient's skin condition in the resident's clinical record. The policy also stated that actual pressure injuries, venous stasis ulcers, arterial ulcers, diabetic/neuropathic ulcers and open surgical wounds would have weekly documentation that included measurements and how the wound was progressing (improvement, worse, unchanged). Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, for skilled nursing care of a wound on their lower leg. The Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a discharge plan that addressed all of the needs for a resident being discharged for 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 1) reviewed for discharge process. This failure allowed a discharge plan to be implemented that did not address Resident 1's need for a CPAP (Continuous Positive Air Pressure device, a breathing therapy device that delivers air to a mask to ensure consistent breathing), and a shower chair and placed residents at risk of unsafe discharges. Findings included The facility policy, dated 09/2002, Discharge Planning Skilled Nursing Facility, noted that, when discharge from the facility was anticipated, Social Services staff would to interview the resident, responsible party, caregiver, and appropriate interdisciplinary team members to discern discharge needs such as equipment, supplies, etc. and then would arrange or assist in arranging for the services and make notifications of services arranged. The policy also noted that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-27 · tag F0645 — widespreadPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a mental health screening tool) assessments were accurately completed for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 5, 28, 66 and 38) when reviewed for PASARRs and unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified mental health care needs. Findings included . Review of a document titled, PASARR Policy, dated 07/2024, showed any potential admissions identified to have a positive Level I PASARR screen must be evaluated by the designated state authority, through the Level II PASARR process, and approved for admission prior to admitting to the nursing facility unless that individual meets criteria for an exempted hospital discharge. The Level II PASARR evaluations were required for all nursing facility residents identified to have indicators of serious mental illness/intellectual disability (SMI/ID) during the Level I screening or at any time during residency in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-27 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — widespreadEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food in an individualized manner when the therapeutic diet was not followed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 23) when reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed residents at risk of choking and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 23 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects a person's ability to think clearly, manage emotions, and interact with others), epilepsy (a brain condition that causes someone to have repeated seizures), and psychosis (trouble telling what's real from what is not). Resident 23 was able to make needs known. Observation of Resident 23's lunch meal ticket on 03/24/2025 at 12:48 PM showed to provide easy to chew foods and the plate had one large piece of unaltered fried chicken. The fried chicken did not appear to be easy to chew. Review of an aspiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain sanitary food storage and preparation areas when reviewed for kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk of foodborne illness, avoidable discomfort, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Observation on 03/24/2025 at 9:23 AM showed the kitchen walk-in refrigerator contained a plastic bag with three energy water drinks and a coffee canned drink. Observation showed an extra-large fountain drink with straw in a different area of the refrigerator. During an interview on 03/24/2025 at 12:02 PM, Staff Y, Registered Dietician, stated the energy waters, coffee canned drink, and fountain drink were likely staff items and should not be stored in the facility walk-in refrigerator. Observation on 03/26/2025 at 11:30 AM showed Staff X, Dietary Services Manager, performed hand hygiene and turned off the water with bare hands. Observation on 03/26/2025 at 11:40 AM showed Staff V, Cook, performed hand hygiene and turned off the water with bare hands. Observation on 03/26/2025 at 12:05 PM showed a preparation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to make needed repairs to maintain a homelike environment on 2 of 4 halls (Halls 100 and 400) and failed to use reusable utensils to maintain a homelike dining experience on 1 of 4 halls (Hall 300) when reviewed for environment. These failures place residents at risk for diminished mood, feelings of worthlessness, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Observations of the shared bathroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] on 03/24/2025 at 9:50 AM, 03/25/2025 at 9:03 AM, and 03/27/2025 at 10:03 AM showed the lower part of both sides of the doorway frame and walls had gouges and peeled off paint. During an interview on 03/27/2025 at 10:03 AM, Staff J, Maintenance Director, stated the shared bathroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] showed both sides of the corner wall doorway frame with gouges that needed to be repaired. Staff J stated staff were to put in a report into TELS (electronic system to put in a work order for items/issues to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written bed-hold notice, at the time of transfer to the hospital, for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 64 and 10) when reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for a lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . Resident 64 Review of the discharge assessment minimum data set (MDS, a required assessment tool), dated 03/23/2025, showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and was transferred to a local hospital for short term care and with a return to the facility anticipated. Review of an interact document titled Skilled Nursing Facility/Nursing Facility (SNF/NF) to Hospital Transfer Form, dated 03/23/2025, showed a licensed nurse (LN) had documented Resident 64 was transferred out of the facility at 10:30 AM. Review of Resident 64's electronic health record (EHR) on 03/24/2025 showed documentation LN had documented the transferred out of the facility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 421 Resident 421 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive (a decline in physical and functional abilities) and need for assistance with personal care. The admission minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 03/25/2025, showed Resident 421 was usually able to make their needs known and understand others. Observation on 03/24/2025 showed Resident 421 laid in bed with their coat on with a strong smell of urine noted. Observation on 03/25/2025 at 2:29 PM showed Resident 421 stood in the doorway to their room with disheveled hair. The heels of their feet were not in their sneakers and the sneakers were not tied. Two different staff walked by Resident 421 without stopping to assist the resident. Observation on 3/27/2025 at 8:40 AM showed Resident 421 sat on the side of their bed eating breakfast. There was dark sediment noted under their fingernails. Review of the care plan dated 03/21/2025 showed Resident 421 required partial physical assist with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 4 Review of the EHR showed Resident 4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities), depression, and psychosis (trouble telling what's real from what is not). Resident 4 was able to make needs known. Review of the EHR showed an MRR, dated 12/02/2024, with a recommendation to decrease some medications. Review showed the provider declined the recommendation on 01/17/2025. Review of the pharmacist medication review report for January 2025 showed Resident 4 had a recommendation for January. During an interview on 03/27/2025 at 10:29 AM, Staff H, LPN/RCM, stated the pharmacist would conduct a MRR monthly. Staff H stated these should be reviewed by the provider within 72 hours, but the facility had been struggling to do this. Staff H stated Resident 4 had a recommendation from 12/02/2024 which was not reviewed until 01/17/2025, and this did not meet expectation. During an interview on 03/27/2025 at 10:42 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 19 Review of the EHR showed Resident 19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis or weakness) of left side, dementia and atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm). Resident 19 was able to make needs known. Review of the provider's order dated 04/03/2024 showed Resident 19 was prescribed Seroquel 60 milligram (mg) for behaviors related to dementia. Review of Resident 19's March 2025 MAR showed the Seroquel had been administered daily. Review of the MAR showed there was no side effect monitoring. During an interview on 03/27/2025 at 10:38 AM, Staff H, LPN/RCM, stated side effect monitoring for the antipsychotic medication should have been documented on the MAR upon the first administration. During an interview on 03/27/2025 at 11:58 AM, Staff C, Corporate Registered Nurse, stated the expectation was an order for side effect monitoring should have been implemented when the provider's order was entered. Reference WAC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage and labeling of medications in 2 of 4 medication carts (100 and 300 medication carts) and 1 of 2 medication rooms (100/200 medication room) when reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving expired medications, ineffective treatment, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Observation of medication room on 03/26/2025 at 1:58 PM with Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), showed the temperature log for March 2025 of the medication refrigerator to have missing documentation for 22 out of 26 opportunities. Review of the refrigerator showed storage of vaccinations, medication and emergency medication supply. During an interview on 03/26/2025 at 2:05 PM, Staff E, LPN, stated licensed nurses were to check the temperature of the refrigerator in the medication room and document twice a day. Observation of the 100 hall medication cart on 03/26/2025 at 1:50 PM with Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper fit and use of personal protective equipment (PPE, equipment worn to minimize exposure to infectious diseases/illnesses) as required for transmission-based precautions (TBP, precautions/PPE used with known or suspected infectious diseases/illnesses) for 3 nursing staff (Staff N, O, and P) in 3 of 4 halls (100, 200, and 300 halls) when reviewed for infection control. Also, the facility failed to complete the ongoing collection and analyzation of infection control data, which included the identification of organisms present in the facility for 3 of 3 months (December 2024, January 2025, and February 2025) when reviewed for infection control. These failures placed residents, visitors, and staff at risk for communicable diseases, infections and related complications. Findings included . <TBP> Review of the facility policy titled Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions revised 03/21/2024 showed Transmission-Based…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and provide influenza and/or pneumococcal vaccines for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 56, 37, and 48) when reviewed for vaccinations. This failure placed the residents at a higher risk for contracting influenza and pneumococcal infections, related complications, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Vaccination of Residents revised October 2019 showed, All residents will be offered vaccines that aid in preventing infectious diseases unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated, or the resident has already been vaccinated, Prior to receiving vaccinations, the resident or legal representative will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccinations, If vaccines are refused, the refusal shall be documented in the resident's medical record., and If the resident receives a vaccine, at least the following information shall be documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and provide Covid-19 vaccines for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 28 and 37) when reviewed for vaccinations. This failure placed the residents at a higher risk for contracting Covid-19 infections, related complications, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 28 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 28 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). The resident was able to make needs known. Review of the EHR showed the resident had consented to receive the Covid-19 vaccine on 10/31/2024. No documentation was found in the resident's EHR that Resident 28 was administered the Covid-19 vaccine. Resident 37 Review of the EHR showed Resident 37 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (unable to move half of the body) and a brain bleed. The resident was able to make needs known. Review of the EHR on 03/24/2025 showed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oversight of certified nurse assistants (CNA) received 12 hours of in-service training per year as required and were provided mandatory dementia management training when reviewed for nurse competencies or their performance evaluations reviews. Failure to ensure CNAs completed required hours of training and competencies and conduct annual performance evaluation reviews placed residents at risk for potential negative outcomes and unmet care needs. Findings included . During an interview on 03/27/2025 at 11:49 AM, Staff CC, CNA, stated they had worked at the facility for the last three years and would be contacted on occasion via email as to what training they needed; however, they did not remember as to what training was still needed and further stated they did not remember getting any performance evaluations the last few years. During an interview and record review on 03/27/2025 at 11:53 AM, Staff Q, Registered Nurse/Infection Preventionist/Staff Development Coordinator, stated they or the facility's human resources…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have signed consent prior to administering mood altering medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 66) when reviewed for unnecessary medications use. This failure placed the resident or their legal representatives at risk of receiving medication without knowledge to make informed decision regarding the use of the medication, adverse side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include major depression, altered mental status, and dementia (brain function impairment with memory and judgment loss). Resident 66 was not able to communicate needs. Review of the medication administration record for the month of March 2025 showed an order dated 02/28/2025 for Divalproex (mood stabilizer medication) twice a day. Resident 66 was administered the medication 03/01/2025 through 03/26/2025 for violent behavior.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an advanced directive (AD, a legal document that establishes a representative to make medical decisions when you and unable to) and/or perform periodic reviews of AD for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 24) when reviewed for AD. This failure placed the resident at risk of not having an established decisionmaker, lack of ability to direct care, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 24 initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression and anxiety disorder. Resident 32 was able to make needs known. Review of the Comprehensive Plan of Care Review form, with an effective date of 05/02/2024, showed Resident 24 had no AD in place, did not wish to formulate an AD, and declined assistance with executing an AD. Review of Resident 24's Care Conference Information forms, dated 10/17/2024 and 12/19/2024, showed both forms were marked Yes, for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct an assessment and signed consent for the use of low bed, bed next to the wall and tilt in space wheelchair for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 38) when reviewed for use of physical restraints. This failure placed the resident at risk for injury, unmet needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (brain function impairment with memory and judgment loss), dislocation of internal left hip prosthesis (an artificial body part), and depression. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 12/24/2024, showed Resident 38 was a high fall risk and required assistance of staff for mobility. Resident 38 was not able to communicate their needs. Observation on 03/25/2025 at 1:40 PM, showed Resident 38 in their room sitting in tilt in space wheelchair with their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit resident minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) within the required timeframe for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 53) when reviewed for MDS timeliness in transmission/submission. This failure to ensure MDS assessment and tracking records were completed and transmitted timely as required placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 12/19/2024. Review of the MDS section in the EHR showed Resident 53 had Medicare-5 Day MDS dated [DATE] completed but not submitted to CMS, and a discharge MDS dated [DATE] was completed but not submitted to CMS. During an interview on 03/27/2025 at 3:13 PM, Staff JJ, Registered Nurse/MDS Nurse, stated the facility transmitted MDS once a week to CMS, and was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set (MDS, a required assessment tool) accurately reflected a weight loss of 10 percent or more in six months for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 24) when reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 24 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malnutrition (the body does not get the right amount or type of nutrients it needs to function properly), anxiety disorder, and depression. Resident 24 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 03/25/2025 at 9:17 AM, Resident 24 stated the food did not taste good and they thought they were losing weight because they did not eat enough. Review of Resident 24's EHR showed on 08/07/2024 the resident weighed 124.6 pounds (lbs.) and on 02/11/2025 the resident weighed 110.0 lbs., which was a 11.72 %…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for 2 of 19 sampled residents (Residents 10 and 7) when reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Failure to care plan Resident 10's fall preventions and Resident 7's range of motion services placed residents at risk of avoidable injury, loss of movement, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 10 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (loss of movement on one side), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), and deafness. Resident 10 was able to make needs known. Review of the facility's incident log from October 2024 to March 2025 showed Resident 10 had fallen on 10/08/2024, 12/01/2024, and 12/15/2024. Review of the incident reports for the falls on 10/08/2024, 12/01/2024, and 12/15/2024 showed new fall interventions to reduce reoccurrence of falls had been developed after each. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was revised and accurately reflected the resident's care needs for 1 out of 19 sampled residents (Resident 24) when reviewed for care planning and revision of care plans. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, medical complications, inaccurate care plan documentation, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health records (EHR) showed Resident 24 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder (mental health condition that causes abnormal thinking and perceptions) and malnutrition (the body does not get the right amount or type of nutrients it needs to function properly). Resident 24 was able to make needs known. Review of the focused care plan initiated on 09/26/2024 showed Resident 24 was on an antipsychotic medication related to dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards for 5 of 19 residents (Residents 5, 10, 24, 59, and 19) when reviewed for care and services. The facility failed to notify a provider (Resident 5), to follow provider parameters (Residents 10 and 19), to provide nonpharmacological interventions (Residents 10 and 24), to document alert charting (Resident 59), and to monitor for side effects (Resident 24). These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, avoidable side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, Tenth Edition ([NAME], [NAME] & [NAME], 2014, page 16), The practice of professional nursing has standards of practice setting minimum levels of acceptable performance for which its practitioners are accountable. According to [NAME], Duell & [NAME], Clinical Nursing Skills, 6th Edition, page 4, Nurse Practice Act identified skills and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 425 Resident 425 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side (weakness and paralysis of the right side of the body), and vascular dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory and thinking). The end of Medicare Part A stay minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 03/07/2025, showed Resident 425 was dependent on staff for all care. Review of the care plan dated 02/20/2025 showed Resident 425 was dependent on staff for activities, cognitive stimulation, and social interaction. Interventions included: Staff would provide social and one-on-one visits and activities to help meet Resident 425's activity goals. The care plan stated Resident 425's preferred activities were: Visits in room, music, television, movies, reading to them, and family visits. Observation on 03/25/2025 at 12:41 PM showed Resident 425 in bed. There was no radio or TV on. Observations were made at the following dates and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 425 Resident 425 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side, and vascular dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory and thinking). The end of Medicare Part A stay minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 03/07/2025, showed Resident 425 was dependent on staff for all care. Observation on 03/24/2025 showed Resident 425 was lying in bed on their back. Resident 425 was laying diagonally in their bed with head on the right side of the bed and feet at the left side of their bed. Review of EHR on 03/25/2025 showed Resident 425 required two staff physical assistance to turn and reposition in bed. Review of the care plan, dated 02/19/2025, showed Resident 425 had potential for impairment to skin integrity due to poor skin turgor (elasticity of the skin). Review showed Resident 425 had severe cognitive (mental processes involved in gaining knowledge and comprehension) impairment. Observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to increase range of motion or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 7) when reviewed for contractures (a shortening of tissue which leads to rigidity of the joints) and mobility. This failure placed the resident at risk for worsening contractures, inability to complete activities of daily living, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 7 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral palsy (congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone and posture), anxiety, depression, and contracture of muscles. Resident 7 was able to communicate needs. Observation and interview on 03/24/2025 at 3:08 PM showed Resident 7 laid in bed in their room with fingers to both hands with rigidity, curled inward towards palms with some fingers overlapping on top of other fingers. Resident 7 stated staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bathroom emergency call light (a system used to call for help) cord length was no higher than six inches from the floor in 1 of 4 hallways (400 hallway) when reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed residents at risk for inability to reach the call light cord if they fell on the floor, delayed response in an emergency, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Observations on 03/24/2025 at 9:50 AM, 03/25/2025 at 9:03 AM, 03/25/2025 at 12:49 PM, and 03/27/2025 at 10:03 AM showed the shared bathroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had an emergency call cord that ended at the location of the handlebar attached to the wall to the left of the toilet (greater than six inches from the floor). During an interview on 03/25/2025 at 12:59 PM, Resident 28 in room [ROOM NUMBER] stated they did not use the bathroom at that time. During an interview and observation on 03/27/2025 at 9:51 AM, Resident 17 in room [ROOM NUMBER]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and consistently document weights per provider orders for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 24) when reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed resident at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 24 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malnutrition (the body does not get the right amount or type of nutrients it needs to function properly), anxiety disorder, and depression. Resident 32 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 03/25/2025 at 9:17 AM, Resident 24 stated the food did not taste good and they thought they were losing weight because they did not eat enough. Review of the provider order dated 12/02/2024 showed Resident 24 was ordered to have bi-weekly weights related to weight loss on day shift every two weeks on Monday. Review of Resident 24's EHR showed the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide prompt dental services for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 28 and 10) when reviewed for dental. This failure placed the residents at risk for continued dental problems and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 28 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 28 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malnutrition (the body does not get the right amount or type of nutrients it needs to function properly) and diabetes (high blood sugar levels). Resident 28 was usually able to make needs known. During an interview and observation on 03/24/2025 at 10:00 AM, Resident 28 stated they could not wear dentures because they did not fit right, and staff were aware. Resident 28 had no teeth and was not wearing dentures. Review of Resident 28's care plan, initiated on 01/15/2020, showed the resident had oral/dental health problems related to edentulous (no natural teeth), had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment in resident areas for 3 of 4 halls (Halls 100, 200, and 400) when reviewed for environment. This failure placed residents at risk of decreased mood and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Observation on 04/22/2024 showed the light fixture above the bathroom sink in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] did not have a cover and the light bulbs were exposed. Observation on 04/26/2024 showed that the bathroom light fixtures in Rooms 110, 114 and 405 did not have a cover and the light bulbs were exposed. Observation on 04/22/2024 at 10:48 AM showed the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER] had deep gouges with flaking drywall which had accumulated on the ground. Observation on 04/22/2024 at 1:17 PM showed the corner near the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] had damaged drywall which was covered by yellow and blue tape. Observation on 04/26/2024 showed that the deep gouges in room [ROOM NUMBER] and damaged drywall in room [ROOM NUMBER]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enteral nutrition (the delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube directly into the stomach or small intestine) was administered in accordance with provider's orders and professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 11 and 24) reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to have a system in place which ensured the amount of enteral formula (liquid food products) a resident received was reconciled with the amount they were ordered to receive. This failure placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition, hydration, and other adverse outcomes. Findings included . Resident 11 Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], showed that Resident 11 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and received their nutrition through a feeding tube. Review of Resident 11's provider order dated 04/01/2024 showed orders for enteral feeding four times a day of Fibersouce HN or equivalent 450…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assured timely acquiring, receiving, and administering of a prescribed medications) to meet the needs of 1 out of 4 sampled residents (Residents 55) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to consistently reconcile controlled medications in 3 of 3 medication carts (medication carts 200, 400, and 300) reviewed for medication storage. Failure to ensure timely receipt and administration of an ordered medication, placed Resident 55 at risk for medical complications and a poor quality of life, and failure to reconcile controlled medications placed residents at risk for misappropriation of their medications and the facility at risk for diversion of controlled medications. Findings included . <Pharmaceutical Services> Review of Resident 55's quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that Resident 55 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor residents' behaviors and/or medication side effects for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 5, 33 and 184) when reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving adequate mental health supports, increased behaviors, increased psychotropic use, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 5 Review showed that Resident 5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder) and psychotic disorder (thoughts and perceptions are disrupted). Review of Resident 5's April 2024 behavior monitoring record (BMR) showed orders to monitor the resident's behaviors and side effects of psychotropic medications. Review showed that four of 24 days were missing entries. During an interview on 04/25/2024 at 10:48 AM, Staff C, Resident Care Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (RCM/LPN), stated that the facility monitored resident behaviors and medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently maintain the medication refrigerator temperature logs in 2 of 2 medication rooms (medication rooms 100/200 hall and 300/400 hall) reviewed for medication storage and labeling. This failure placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medications. Findings included . Observation on 04/23/2024 at 11:30 AM with Staff H, Resident Care Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (RCM/LPN), of the 100/200 hall medication room refrigerator containing various liquid medications that included vaccines, showed April 2024 refrigerator temperature monitoring logs for AM and PM, from 04/01/2024 - 04/22/2024 with inconsistent documentation. The logs had either blanks or one temperature logged on 11 out of 22 dates. During an interview on 04/23/2024 at 11:30 AM, Staff H, RCM/LPN, stated the 100/200 hall medication room's April 2024 refrigerator temperature monitoring logs for AM and PM had blanks and one temperature logged at times and since there were vaccines stored in the refrigerator the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a call light system that allowed residents to call for help from the floor of the bathroom for 2 of 4 hallways (Halls 200 and 400) when reviewed for call light system. This failure placed residents at risk of not being able to call for assistance, delayed response to a fall, injury, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Observation on 04/22/2024 showed the call light string in the bathrooms of rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were short and could not be reached if laying on the floor. Observation on 04/26/2024 showed that the bathroom call light sting the bathrooms of rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were short and could not be reached if laying on the floor. Observation on 04/26/2024 showed the bathroom call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] was short and could not be reached if laying on the floor. During an interview on 04/26/2024 at 10:00 AM, Staff N, Maintenance Director, stated the facility performed call light audits to ensure they were accessible to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have system and timely resolution of a grievance for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 31) reviewed for grievances. Failure to ensure grievance/concerns were addressed and resolved timely had the potential to affect the resident's quality of life. Findings included . Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. Review of the annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/09/2023, showed Resident 31 was admitted with diagnoses of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, renal insufficiency, and had intact cognitive functions. During an interview on 04/22/2024 at 11:48 AM, Resident 31 stated staff were not listening to their complaints. Resident 31 stated staff were not treating them well because their roommate had an iPad, and the volume was loud and was disturbing her. Resident 31 had reported their concern to staff, but the staff were not listening. Resident 31 stated they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 2 of 22 residents (Residents 72 and 5) when reviewed for accuracy of assessments. This failure placed the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services required to meet the residents' needs and inaccuracies in their care planning. Findings included . Resident 72 Review of Resident 72's admission minimum data set (MDS, a required assessment tool), dated 03/18/2024, showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include heart/lung disease, diabetes and for post-surgical care for partial amputation of both right and left foot. The MDS showed the resident was able to make their needs known. During an interview on 04/22/2024 at 11:43 AM, Resident 72 stated that they had diabetes but did not receive any insulin in the facility. Review of Resident 72's medication administration record (MAR) for March 2024 and April 2024 showed the resident did not have a provider's order for insulin and had not received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were following provider's orders for medication administration for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 18) reviewed for unnecessary medications. In addition, the facility failed provide a psychiatry referral per provider's recommendation for 1 of 2 sampled resident (Resident 184) when reviewed for behavioral health care needs. This failure placed the residents at potential risk of having adverse side effects, medication errors and unmet care services. Findings included . Resident 18 Resident 18 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes, stroke, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, and depression. Review of the minimum data set (MDS, a required assessment tool), dated 03/18/2024, showed Resident 18 could make needs known. Review of Resident 18's provider's orders showed an order for hydralazine (used to treat high blood pressure) and to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure was less than 120. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor and document bowel movements (BM) and implement the bowel program when needed for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 61 and 40) reviewed for bowel protocol. This failure placed the residents at risk for worsening condition, discomfort, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of a facility's policy titled, Avamere Living - Bowel Care Protocol, dated 10/2020, showed the policy of the facility was to monitor the bowel records of residents to assure that they attained a normal bowel pattern without complications. If the resident had not had a bowel movement for three consecutive days (must be medium or large), then staff were to administer the bowel protocol that the provider had ordered. Resident 61 Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS, a required assessment tool), dated 01/23/2024, showed the resident admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include lung disease, fracture of spine, opioid abuse (medication used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a clear system in place to monitor and accurately document fluids consumed to ensure fluid restrictions (a diet which limits the amount of daily fluid intake) was implemented per provider's orders for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 24) reviewed for fluid restrictions. These failures placed the resident at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] showed that Resident 24 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include malnutrition (a condition when the body does not get enough nutrients/poor nutrition), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), had a feeding tube (a tube inserted through the skin and directly into the stomach or small intestine to provide liquid food), received dialysis (treatment to filter wastes and water from the blood) services, was provided a mechanically altered diet, and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure freedom from unnecessary pain medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 33) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Failure to provide non-pharmacological interventions (approaches, therapies, or treatments that do not involve drugs) prior to giving as needed pain medications placed the resident at risk for side-effects related to the medication, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Resident 33 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic pain syndrome (long standing persistent pain), anxiety disorder, and the resident was able to make needs known. Review of Resident 33's revision dated 01/03/2024 focused actual pain care plan showed an intervention was initiated on 04/28/2021 to attempt nonpharmacological intervention prior to administering pain medications such a reposition, redirection,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment of an ileostomy (an opening in the body for the discharge of body wastes into a collection bag) was consistent to prevent skin breakdown for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for colostomy/ileostomy care. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including Crohn's Disease (a type of inflammatory bowel disease that causes swelling of the tissues of the digestive tract), for which Resident 1 had had an ileostomy placed prior to admission to the facility. The Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 08/28/2023, documented Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive staff assistance with activities of daily living. An 08/22/2023 11:21 AM admission Nursing Database documented Resident 1 had an ileostomy site, with no further measurements or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-04-26 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification of the reason for transfer/discharge to the resident or responsible party for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 81, 24 and 33) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for diminished protection from being inappropriately discharged . Findings included . Resident 81 Review of Resident 81's 01/21/2024 discharge minimum data set (MDS, a required assessment tool) showed the resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE] with return anticipated and the resident's MDS tracking showed Resident 81 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 81's electronic health record (EHR) showed no documentation that a written notice of transfer/discharge was provided to Resident 81 and/or a responsible party for the transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. During an interview on 04/23/2024 at 1:11 PM, Staff E, Social Service Director, stated they were unaware that written notices were required to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice in writing at the time of transfer to the hospital or within 24 hours of transfer to the hospital for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 81 and 33) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding the right to hold their bed while they were at the hospital and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 81 Review of the medical record showed Resident 81 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was able to make needs known. Review of a progress note dated 01/21/2024 at 6:02 AM showed Resident 81 was transported to the hospital due to a complaint of sharp chest pain. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed no documentation that a bed hold was offered, nor the bed hold notice had been provided to the resident or the resident's representative. During an interview on 04/23/2024 at 1:11 PM, Staff E, Social Service Director, reviewed the EHR and stated a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$57,783 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $22,432 — penalty dated 2025-01-17
- $27,073 — penalty dated 2024-10-04
- $8,278 — penalty dated 2024-07-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVAMERE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARISO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/06/2006 |
| ARI OPERATIONS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/06/2006 |
| AVAMERE GROUP LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/06/2006 |
| KARL RICKARD MILLER JR REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/11/2011 |
| MILLER, KARL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/1998 |
| MIDCAP FINCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/22/2010 |
| CAVALLO, GLEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 06/01/2025 |
| FEAKIN, CODY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| FUNDERBERG, MICHELLE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| HASKINS, DAMIEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| HILL, KEVIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/12/2022 |
| HOSKINS, TONIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| INSKEEP, TODD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/21/2022 |
| KOFSTAD, MARY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/13/2024 |
| MUNRO, JOLYNN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| OKOLI, IKE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 06/01/2025 |
| POLSON, JUSTIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/10/2025 |
| POWELSON, MICHELE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/25/2015 |
| REID, MISTY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2025 |
| SANDERS, AMANDA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 06/01/2025 |
| SIMPSON, ANDREW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| STAPLES, CAROLYN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| STRUNK, COLBY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| VANDERZANDEN, CARRIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| AVAMERE HEALTH SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2005 |
| AVAMERE SKILLED ADVISORS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2005 |
| BROOKS, ANTHONY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/16/2024 |
| FANUNAL, LORIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2023 |
| FOWLER, KATHERINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| KRETCHMAR, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| MCKINNEY, MARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/27/2023 |
| POIRIER, STACY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| PRESLEY, YOLANDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/06/2025 |
| STRIDER, SHELBY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| GAMES, KIM | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/15/2024 |
| SCAGLIONE, ANITA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/30/2025 |
| WHYTE, ASHLEY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 69 rows in the source record cover these 37 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $862K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505264. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.