Avamere Health Services Of Rogue Valley
625 Stevens Street, Medford, OR 97504 · For profit - Corporation · 91 certified beds · (541) 779-3551 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.3% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.4% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 2.0% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.0% | 4.9% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 40.0% | 20.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.3% | 12.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.3% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.4% | 5.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.1% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.0% | 13.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.4% | 81.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.8% | 21.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.0% | 16.1% | 12.0% | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 155 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 119 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.71 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 46% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.3%CMS range 50.5–64.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.6%CMS range 6.1–12.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 4.8–12.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.06 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 65.8 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.11 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.75 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment for 1 of 7 sampled residents (# 84) and 2 of 3 halls reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for discomfort and burns. Findings include:1. On 8/19/25 at 8:03 AM, Resident 84 stated her/his room was very cold and at night she/he wore two pairs of socks on her/his feet, sweatpants, a sweatshirt, and socks on her/his hands to stay warm. Resident 84 was observed in the wheelchair, had a blanket around her/his shoulders. At this time a staff entered the room and asked Resident 84 if she/he was still cold. On 8/19/25 at 3:29 PM, Staff 17 (Maintenance Director) stated he checked temperatures in the resident rooms weekly and would expect resident rooms to be between 72 and 78 degrees. Staff 17 was asked to check the room temperature in Resident 84's room. Temperatures obtained were 64 degrees, 65 degrees, and the area around the air conditioner vent in Resident 84's room was 54 degrees.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and observation it was determined the facility failed to store medications in a safe manner for 2 of 3 halls. This placed residents at risk for misuse of medications. Findings include:On 8/18/25 at 12:13 PM, an observation was made with Staff 18 (LPN) of a bottle of antifungal powder in an unlocked precaution cart outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff 18 stated the antifungal powder should be locked in the treatment cart.On 8/19/25 at 11:05 AM, an observation was made with Staff 18 of a bottle of antifungal powder located in room [ROOM NUMBER] on a small table near the bed. Staff 18 stated the antifungal powder should be locked in the treatment cart.On 8/21/25 at 8:28 AM, an observation was made with Staff 16 (RN) of a bottle of antifungal powder located in room [ROOM NUMBER] on the overbed table. Staff 16 stated the antifungal powder should be locked in the treatment cart.On 8/21/25 at 8:45 AM, Staff 2 (DNS) stated antifungal powder should be locked in the treatment cart.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff followed transmission-based precautions and provided wound care in a sanitary manner for 2 of 3 halls reviewed for infection control and 1 of 1 sampled resident (#47) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for spread of infections. Findings include: 1. On 8/18/25 at 12:35 PM, signage was posted outside room [ROOM NUMBER] and instructed all staff who assisted the resident in Bed A to wear gowns and gloves during high-contact (frequent physical interaction) activities, including resident transfers. On 8/18/25 at 12:36 PM, Staff 29 (PT) was observed transferring the resident in Bed A from the bed to a wheelchair without wearing a gown or gloves. Staff 29 stated she did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE) because she did not handle the resident's catheter. On 8/20/25 at 8:40 AM, Staff 19 (IP) stated therapy staff were provided with a list of residents on transmission-based…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency allegations of verbal abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#14) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for verbal abuse. Findings include:Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in 6/2025 with diagnoses including alcohol abuse and seizures.On 8/18/25 at 2:41 PM, Resident 14 stated she/he received a NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) from the Social Service Director and a nurse. Resident 14 stated the nurse told her/him the facility was not a homeless shelter. Resident 14 stated she/he felt belittled by the comment, and she/he notified the administrator via email but did not hear back from the administrator. Resident 14 provided a copy of a NOMNC signed on 8/6/25 by Staff 4 (Social Service Director) and Staff 19 (LPN Infection Preventionist).On 8/20/25 at 2:20 PM, Staff 1 provided an email between Resident 14 and himself sent from Resident 14 on 8/7/25 with a subject line Formal Complaint Regarding Improper Notice, Coercion, and Staff Conduct. Item 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate allegations of verbal abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#14) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for verbal abuse.Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in 6/2025 with diagnoses including alcohol abuse and seizures.On 8/18/25 at 2:41 PM, Resident 14 stated she/he received a NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) from the Social Service Director and a nurse. Resident 14 stated the nurse told her/him the facility was not a homeless shelter. Resident 14 stated she/he felt belittled by the comment, and she/he notified the administrator via email but did not hear back from the administrator. Resident 14 provided a copy of a NOMNC signed on 8/6/25 by Staff 4 (Social Service Director) and Staff 19 (LPN Infection Preventionist).On 8/20/25 at 2:20 PM, Staff 1 provided an email between Resident 14 and himself sent from Resident 14 on 8/7/25 with a subject line Formal Complaint Regarding Improper Notice, Coercion, and Staff Conduct. Item 3 of the email stated while Resident 14 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to reflect resident-centered care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#6) reviewed for behavior. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including dementia. A comprehensive care plan dated 5/21/25 revealed Resident 6 had a behavior monitor in place, with behaviors of agitation, fabricating stories, and anxiety. The behavior monitor identified the following triggers: history of growing up in an alcoholic environment, dealing with physical/mental changes, and roommate issues. There was no additional behavior care plan.A 5/28/25 progress note revealed Resident 6 had hallucinations. A 6/18/25 progress note revealed Resident 6 was very confused and argumentative with CNA staff. A 6/26/25 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 6 had verbal behaviors towards others. A 7/16/25 progress note revealed Resident 6 often called out, had difficulty sleeping, displayed agitation with staff and other residents, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide dental care to 1 of 2 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with diagnoses including COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and dementia. A 7/25/25 Dental/Oral Evaluation revealed Resident 1 had oral thrush (fungal infection of the mouth) and wore full upper and partial lower dentures. A 7/27/25 admission MDS indicated Resident 1 was assessed with a BIMS score of 2 (severe cognitive impairment) and required set-up assistance for oral hygiene. An 8/5/25 care plan revealed oral care was to include cleaning her/his full upper and partial lower dentures. On 8/18/25 at 9:23 PM, Witness 3 (Family) stated she was in the facility for 72 hours with Resident 1 and family cleaned and inserted the resident's dentures because staff did not assist the resident. On 8/20/25 at 8:58 AM, Resident 1 was observed with mouth odor and the resident stated she/he wore her/his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide meaningful activities for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 2 and 3) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for lack of social interaction and isolation. Findings include:1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 8/2025 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's (major decline in cognitive abilities) disease and stroke. An 8/10/25 admission MDS indicated Resident 2 was assessed with a BIMS score of 2 (severe cognitive impairment), it was important to the resident to have things to read, to do her/his favorite activities, and get outside when the weather was good. Activities were encouraged for Resident 2 related to her/his cognitive impairment and staff were to anticipate her/his needs. An 8/18/25 care plan indicated Resident 2 required assistance to attend activities and in-room materials as indicated. Resident 2's interests included: engineering shows, technology reading materials, table games, gardening, and music. Review of the 8/5/25 through 8/18/25 CNA Tasks:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement fall precautions for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 5 and 13) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injuries related to falls. Findings include:1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with diagnoses including stroke, hip fracture, and dementia.An 8/13/25 revised care plan indicated Resident 5 was at high risk for falls and instructed staff to place fall mats on each side of her/his bed. On 8/19/25 at 2:20 PM, Resident 5 was observed in bed with no fall mats at her/his bedside. On 8/20/25 at 2:05 PM, Witness 2 (Family) stated she visited Resident 5 routinely and no fall mats were used for Resident 5. On 8/20/25 at 6:48 PM, Staff 26 (CNA) stated she provided care for Resident 5 and was unaware fall mats were indicated in her/his care plan. On 8/21/25 at 11:45 AM, Staff 24 (LPN) stated she was not aware Resident 5 was to have fall mats in place because it was not on the TAR. On 8/21/25 at 1:03 PM, Staff 15 (LPN-Resident Care Manager) expected staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews it was determined the facility failed to maintain a healthy nutritional status for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#55) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for malnutrition and weight loss. Findings include: Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including falls and Multiple Sclerosis (an autoimmune disease of the brain and spinal cord where the body's immune system attacks the protective area around nerve cells causing damage that disrupts communication between the brain and body).A 7/31/25 Physician Order revealed Resident 55 had orders for a regular diet.A review of Resident 55's weights revealed the following: 7/31/25 146.8 lbs. (weight was struck out for being inaccurate) 8/4/25 131.8 lbs. 8/5/25 128 lbs. 8/11/25 123.6 lbs. 8/12/25 124.2 lbs.An 8/13/25 Progress Note revealed Resident 55 had a 5.8% weight loss.On 8/18/25 at 12:39 PM, Resident 55 stated she/he did not eat much due to the food being, terrible. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to treat resident's pain in accordance with resident preference for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at risk for unmanaged pain. Findings include: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including chronic pain. A 7/9/25 Progress Note revealed the resident requested she/he be prescribed lidocaine patches to manage her/his pain. The request was also documented in the Provider Communications Notebook by Staff 22 (former LPN-Resident Care Manager). A review of the 8/2025 Pain Level Summary revealed Resident 10 reported pain levels of 3 to 6 (moderate to severe) on 9 of 21 days reviewed. On 8/19/25 at 8:44 AM, Resident 10 stated she/he regularly experienced severe pain.On 8/21/25 at 12:22 PM, Staff 23 (Medical Director) stated she was not aware Resident 10 requested lidocaine patches. Staff 23 stated she and the nurse practitioner reviewed the Provider Communications Notebook during each visit to the facility. On 8/22/25 at 11:30 AM, Staff 2 (DNS) stated she was unable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain routine dental services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#27) reviewed for dental care. This placed residents at risk for unmet dental needs. Findings include: Resident 27 was admitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including dementia.A 2/6/25 progress note revealed Resident 27's diet was downgraded due to loose dentures.A 2/13/25 progress note revealed Resident 27 did not want to get up for meals as she/he was having trouble with her/his dentures.A 3/21/25 progress note revealed Resident 27 did not want other people to see her/his top dentures because they always fell down while eating.A Care Plan revised 4/21/25 revealed Resident 27 wore upper dentures.A 5/27/25 social service progress note revealed an attempt to make a dental appointment for Resident 27. A 6/20/25 Care Conference Information evaluation revealed Resident 27 was concerned about her/his dentures not fitting and had a dental appointment coming up. On 8/19/2025 at 7:49 AM, Resident 27 was observed eating in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to address with resident council grievances for 1 of 1 resident council reviewed for grievances. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: An 4/17/24 review of resident council notes revealed a Bi-Monthly Resident Counsel Questions form was completed on 4/10/24 which revealed the following concerns: -Residents did not feel they were treated respectfully by staff. -Residents did not feel staff listened to their needs or responded timely. -Residents did not feel staff followed up with them when they had a concern or issue. -Residents felt staff retaliated when they expressed concerns. -Residents stated staff did not answer their call lights within 10 minutes. -Residents felt the noise level in the facility was unacceptable. -Residents stated the facility did not offer snacks at bedtime and when requested. -Residents stated the food did not taste good and it was cold. -Residents stated lost items were not replaced by the facility. -Residents did not feel there were enough activities to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an unkempt environment. Findings include: Observations of the facility's general environment and residents' rooms from 4/15/24 through 4/19/24 identified the following issues: -room [ROOM NUMBER] had a missing floorboard in the center of the room. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had a large chunk of the bathroom door missing which exposed the inside material of the door and there was missing paint. -room [ROOM NUMBER]-B had wall damage with missing paint behind the bed and along the wall where the bathroom was located. -room [ROOM NUMBER]-A had wall damage with missing paint along the wall to the left of the residents bed. -Lights were not working on the 200 hall outside rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. -A small round table in the smoking area had sharp and jagged edges that were approximately 18 inches long. -The double doors at the end of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with a diagnosis of pernicious anemia (inability of the body to absorb vitamin B12; left untreated it can cause irreversible damage to the nervous system). An 4/2024 MAR revealed Resident 52 was to be administered Folic Acid 400 micrograms QD for vitamin B12 deficiency. The MAR indicated the Folic Acid was not administered from 4/13/24 through 4/16/24. Progress Notes revealed the following: -4/13/24 Folic Acid-dose on order -4/14/24 Folic Acid-waiting on pharmacy to deliver -4/15/24 Folic Acid-waiting on pharmacy to dispense -4/16/24 Folic Acid-waiting on pharmacy to dispense On 4/17/24 at 3:50 PM Staff 10 (LPN Unit Manager) stated Folic Acid 400 micrograms was an over-the-counter medication which was available in the central supply closet and should have been administered. Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as prescribed, were monitored for medication side effects and provide wound care as ordered for 4 of 14 sampled residents (#s 8, 52, 58 and 59)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain water temperatures below 120 F for 3 of 4 resident bathrooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 108, 111) reviewed for hot water and follow care plan interventions, assess for care plan effectiveness, identify and implement new fall interventions and provide adequate supervision needed to prevent falls for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for injury. Findings include: 1. On 4/17/24 from 10:55 AM through 12:02 PM with Staff 44 (Maintenance Lead) the following bathroom water temperatures were obtained: -room [ROOM NUMBER] 123 F -room [ROOM NUMBER] 125 F -room [ROOM NUMBER] 121 F Resident 26 and Resident 29 resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] and both required staff assistance for toileting transfers. Resident 20 and Resident 52 resided in room [ROOM NUMBER], both were cognitively intact. Resident 52 was independent for toileting and Resident 20 required one staff assistance for toileting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to have adequate staff available to timely meet the needs of residents for 3 of 18 sampled residents (#s 32, 60 and 160) and for 2 of 3 wings (Wings 1 and 2). This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. A 2/7/24 Quality Assurance Resident Council note indicated call light wait times were too long. The 2/12/24 Response Form indicated the facility followed the state minimum CNA staffing requirements. A 3/6/24 Resident Council Department Response Form indicated the residents felt they needed more nurses and there were not enough which affected their care. The facility's response was they staffed to meet the state minimum staffing requirements. An 4/10/24 Bi-Monthly Resident Counsel Questions form revealed the questions if residents felt staff answered call lights within a 10-minute time frame, and if the resident counsel felt the facility was staffed well enough to meet the needs of the residents, to which the answer to both was documented as no. An 4/10/24 Resident Council…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-19 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to post accurate and complete staffing information for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for incomplete and inaccurate staffing information. Findings include: A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports (DCSDR) from 11/23/23 through 12/15/23 revealed no staff hours were documented on eight days, census was documented only one day, and the number of staff was not documented two days out of 23 days reviewed. On 4/19/24 at 7:39 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 (DNS) stated they were not aware of the issues with the DCSDR reports. Staff 2 stated the Staffing Coordinator was newer to the facility during the above reviewed time period.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to handle and prepare food in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitary practices. This placed residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings include: On 4/17/24 at 8:24 AM the beverage carts for Wing 1 and Wing 2 were observed with dirty coffee pots which were used for the residents. Staff 28 (Dietary Services Manager) acknowledged the coffee pots needed deep cleaning. On 4/17/24 at 11:45 AM the following was observed during preparing and plating food from the kitchen's steam table for lunch: -Staff 31 (Dietary Aide) performed a temperature check on all food. The food was within normal limits except for the potato salad which was 51 degrees and needed to be 41 degrees. No further checking was performed for the potato salad. -Staff 31 was observed touching the food with utensils and his gloved hands, he then stepped away from the steam table to retrieve tongs and did not perform hand hygiene or don new gloves. Staff 31 left the steam table twice to retrieve food from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#52) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for lack of self-worth. Findings include: Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with a diagnosis of pernicious anemia (inability of the body to absorb vitamin B12; left untreated it can cause irreversible damage to the nervous system). A 3/23/24 admission MDS revealed Resident 52 was cognitively intact. On 4/15/24 at 1:17 PM and 4/17/24 at 11:47 AM Resident 52 stated she/he took medication which was required to prevent her/his health from significantly declining. The side affects of the medication made her/him feel ill for up to four hours after it was administered and she/he preferred to take the medication in the morning. One Thursday morning Resident 52 asked the nurse when her/his medication could be administered. The nurse's response was that she had the medication in her pocket and would administer the medication when the nurse wanted to administer it. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to treat residents with respect for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#63) reviewed for abuse and call lights. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignified treatment. Findings include: Resident 63 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including kidney failure and difficulty walking. A 11/19/23 admission MDS indicated Resident 63 was cognitively intact. A 12/15/23 FRI indicated staff yelled at Resident 63, and refused to assist her/him with cares. The FRI included the resident had significant care needs and depended on staff for assistance. On 4/18/24 at 11:23 AM Witness 5 (Complainant) indicated Resident 63 stated staff yelled at her/him all the time. An Incident report dated 12/15/23 included the following: -Staff 7 (CNA) and Staff 48 (CNA) were bathing Resident 63's roommate. Resident 63 asked Staff 7 if she/he could have a shower later in the day. Staff 7 stated he would try to do a shower for her/him in the afternoon. Resident 63 stated later she/he asked Staff 48 for a shower and Staff 48 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure grievances were resolved or resolutions sustained for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 7 and 29) reviewed for grievances and care planning. This placed residents at risk for unresolved concerns. Findings include: The facility's Grievance Policy dated 5/2000 stated: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all residents and their family members are afforded the opportunity to express their concerns and suggest changes in facility policy formally, in writing if they desire without the fear of restraint, interference, coercion, discrimination or reprisal. Additionally, the nursing facility will listen to and act promplty upon grievances and recommendations received from resident, family and advocacy groups. 1. Resident 7 admitted to the facility in 10/2017 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes and major depressive disorder. On 10/12/23 a public complaint was received which indicated Resident 7 expressed concerns about nursing staff throwing her/his food away and the facility administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#19) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 8/2020 with diagnoses including post laminectomy syndrome (a condition in which a person continues to feel pain after back surgery). An 8/22/23 MDS indicated Resident 19 was cognitively intact. A 9/9/23 Progress Note stated Resident 19 was subjected to physical aggression when she/he ignored Resident 1. Resident 1 yanked on Resident 19's hair. Both residents were separated, and Resident 19 was placed on alert charting. A review of a 9/9/23 care plan revealed Resident 1 had a resolved care plan for physical aggression toward another resident. A 9/13/23 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Evaluation indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. On 4/18/24 at 8:05 AM Resident 1 stated, when asked about the 9/2023 incident with another resident, I do not remember the incident, but it sounds like…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess a resident for a significant change in condition for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including infection and pressure ulcer of the lower spine. Resident 6's 12/14/23 Physician Order indicated the resident was referred to hospice services. Resident 6's Census log indicated the resident started hospice services on 12/20/23. A review of Resident 6's MDS records indicated a Significant Change MDS was not completed after the resident started hospice services. On 4/18/24 at 11:06 AM Staff 19 (LPN Unit Manager) reviewed Resident 6's MDS records. Staff 19 stated a Significant Change MDS was required if a resident started hospice services. Staff 19 confirmed a Significant Change MDS was not completed for Resident 6.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to accurately reflect the needs of residents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#7) reviewed for care plans. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 7 admitted to the facility in 10/2017 with diagnoses including diabetes and major depressive disorder. A Care Plan initiated on 9/20/23 revealed the resident was to use her/his call light, walkie talkie or to call the nurses' station by phone if staff assistance was needed. A 2/9/24 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 7 was cognitively intact. A [NAME] (brief overview of each resident) dated 4/15/24 revealed staff were to encourage Resident 7 to use her/his call light for her/his needs and to ensure all staff were able to attend to her/his needs. A 3/18/24 Alert Note revealed Resident 7 was reminded staff could not hear or see the call light from the hall the resident was on and for Resident 7 to use her/his call bell…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain healthy parameters of nutritional status for 3 of 6 residents (#s 32, 60 and 358) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for weight loss. Findings include: 1. Resident 32 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including stroke and dementia. An 10/3/23 MDS indicated Resident 32 had moderate cognitive impairment. No dietary issues were noted, and she/he was working with ST and currently weighed 142 pounds. An 10/2023 MAR instructed staff to administer a nutritional supplement three times a day with a discontinuation date of 10/30/23. An 10/28/23 Order Note indicated the supplement appeared to cause gastrointestinal upset. A Weight Summary Review revealed Resident 32 weighed 148 pounds on 9/29/23 and 135 pounds on 10/30/23. (Eight percent weight loss) No documentation was found in Resident 32's clinical record for a Nutritional Assessment after an eight percent weight loss. On 4/19/24 at 7:46 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 (DNS) stated there was usually a report which was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication with the dialysis center for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#63) reviewed for rehab. This placed residents at risk for dialysis complications. Findings include: Resident 63 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease and was dependent on dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products from the blood when the kidneys stop working). Resident 63's care plan for renal failure dialysis, revised on 11/15/23, indicated the resident's scheduled dialysis days were Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed a 11/21/23 document related to dialysis communication. There were no forms from 11/22/23 through 12/15/23 between the facility and the dialysis provider. On 4/19/23 at 8:39 AM Staff 10 (LPN Unit Manager) indicated there was one dialysis communication form in Resident 63's clinical record. Staff 10 stated the form was an important document and used for communication between the dialysis center and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication was available for administration for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#52) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for an ineffective medication regimen. Findings include: Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with a diagnosis of pernicious anemia (inability of the body to absorb vitamin B12; left untreated it can cause irreversible damage to the nervous system). A 3/23/24 admission MDS revealed Resident 52 was cognitively intact. Resident 52 had a severe degeneration of her/his spinal cord due to a vitamin B12 deficiency. On 4/15/24 at 1:17 PM and 4/17/24 at 11:47 AM Resident 52 stated she/he took vitamin B12 daily, which was required to prevent her/his health from significantly declining. Resident 52 stated it was like life or death to her/him if she/he missed the medication. Resident 52 stated the facility did not have her/his vitamin B12 available to administer. An 4/2024 MAR revealed vitamin B12 was not administered on 4/15/24. An 4/15/24 Progress Note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. The facility administration error rate was 7% with two errors in 27 opportunities. This placed residents at risk for an ineffective medication regimen. Findings include: 1. Resident 303 admitted to the facility in 2024 with a diagnosis of a low functioning thyroid. Epocrates Online (web based pharmacy resource) revealed levothyroxine (hormone replacement)should be taken 15 to 60 minutes before breakfast with a full glass of water at the same time daily. Resident 303's 4/6/24 admission MDS indicated she/he was cognitively intact. On 4/16/24 at 7:30 AM Staff 15 (LPN) was observed to administer levothryoxine to Resident 303. Resident 303 was observed eating breakfast and stopped to take her/his medications including the levothyroxine. On 4/16/24 at 2:58 PM Resident 303 stated when she/he was at home, she usually did not take levothyroxine with food. Resident 303 stated she/he took the levothyroxine as soon as she/he woke up, even before she/he drank…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 8 and 40) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for unmet food preferences. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including diabetes. An 4/17/24 breakfast menu ticket revealed poached eggs, toast, link sausage, cream of wheat, and two percent milk. On 4/17/24 at 7:51 AM Resident 8 stated she/he received scrambled eggs instead of poached eggs and did not receive any drinks. On 4/19/24 at 7:54 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 (DNS) stated they expected the kitchen to provide Resident 8 what was on her/his menu ticket. 2. Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive. An 4/17/24 breakfast menu ticket revealed Resident 40 circled hash brown patty, grapes, two eggs over easy, and coffee. The lunch menu ticket indicated a hamburger on a bun. The bun portion was crossed out and a handwritten English muffin was in place of the bun.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide assistive devices for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 8 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including diabetic neuropathy (damage or disease affecting the nerves). An 4/3/24 care plan indicated Resident 8 was at nutritional risk with interventions including adaptive equipment of a two-handle cup and a lip plate. An 4/17/24 breakfast menu ticket revealed the following adaptive equipment: a lip plate and a two-handle cup. On 4/17/24 the following occurred: -7:46 AM Staff 4 (CNA) brought out a small plastic cup with a white liquid out of Resident 8's room. -7:51 AM Resident 8 stated she/he did not know where her/his milk was, and she/he did not receive any drinks with breakfast. -7:55 AM Staff 4 stated she took Resident 8's milk because her/his cup did not have an adaptive handle on it. -7:58 AM Staff 4 came out of the kitchen with Resident 8's cup with adaptive handles on it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure records were accurate for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#44) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate treatment. Findings include: Resident 44 was admitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses including high blood pressure. Resident 44's 12/19/23 Physician Order indicated the resident was to receive lisinopril (medication to treat high blood pressure) one time a day and the medication was to be held for systolic blood pressure (pressure in the arteries when the heart beats) below 110 and diastolic blood pressure (pressure in the arteries when the heart rests between beats) below 60. Resident 44's 3/2024 and 4/2024 MARs indicated the resident's blood pressure was documented as NA on 3/27/24, 4/1/24, 4/5/24, 4/8/24, 4/9/24, 4/15/24 and 4/16/24. On 4/18/24 at 10:32 AM Staff 19 (LPN Unit Manager) and Staff 22 (CMA) reviewed Resident 44's physician order and 3/2024 and 4/2024 MARs. Staff 19 stated Resident 44's blood pressure readings needed to be documented on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor antibiotic use for 1 of 1 resident (#1) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 7/2013 with diagnoses including infection due to urinary catheter, and a history of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO). An 4/16/24 review of Resident 1's care plan revealed a 2/9/23 care plan for enhanced barrier precautions related to a history of MDRO infections and a 2/18/24 care plan for chronic urinary tract infections. A review of Resident 1's 2/2024 MAR revealed an order for cephalexin (an antibiotic) for a urinary tract infection which started on 2/17/24 and ended on 2/25/24. A 2/16/24 urine analysis lab indicated Resident 1 had a small number of bacteria in her/his urine. On 4/16/24 Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged there was no culture and sensitivity completed with the urinalysis to determine the correct antibiotic for Resident 1. On 4/19/24 at 8:41 AM Staff 2 acknowledged Resident 1 completed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed prior to prescription and use of psychotropic medications for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#29) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for over-sedation. Findings include: Resident 29 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of mild dementia without behaviors. Progress Notes revealed the following: -1/19/24 Resident 29 admitted to the facility and was noted to have some short-term memory loss. -1/20/24 Resident 29 was alert, oriented, followed commands, had some forgetfulness, no unwanted behaviors, and slept through the night. The resident was noted to be adjusting well. -1/20/24 at 11:50 PM Resident 29 was found on the floor. The resident was at her/his baseline mental status. -1/21/24 and 1/22/24 Resident 29 was assessed to have no injury from her/his fall. -1/22/24, 1/23/24, and 1/25/24 Resident 29's mood was pleasant with no unwanted behaviors.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure grievances were resolved for residents in a timely manner for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1 and 9) reviewed for grievances. This placed residents at risk for unresolved concerns. Findings include: A Lost Item Policy last revised 9/2004 revealed the facility would make every effort to ensure resident belongings were protected and to recapture lost items or to make restitution should a lost item not be recovered. After the lost item was reported as missing and not recovered, within three business days, the form was to be forwarded to the administrator to determine if further action was needed. The facility was to communicate with the resident within five business days after the social service staff received the form back from the administrator. 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including diabetes. A 3/12/23 Complaints/Grievance form revealed Resident 1 reported a full pack of cigarettes was missing. Staff went to the store for the resident and bought cigarettes with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was not abused for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for injury. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2016 with diagnoses including dementia. A FRI dated 4/13/23 revealed Staff 2 (CNA) used force while she assisted Resident 3 with incontinent care. Resident 3 did not turn when Staff 2 requested the resident to turn, therefore Staff 2 reported she used the sheet to roll the resident hard. At the time of the incident Staff 2 stated she was irritated and frustrated and knew it was wrong. Resident 9 was interviewed at the time of the incident and reported a staff person threw her/him over several times and it was upsetting but denied ongoing fear. On 7/28/23 at 9:50 AM Staff 2 acknowledged she used force to turn Resident 3 during incontinent care by using a turn sheet. Staff 2 stated it was during last rounds, she was not able to find anyone to help her and she tugged hard on the turn sheet. Staff 2 stated it was wrong to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including diabetes. A Significant event form dated 2/27/23 revealed Resident 1 reported a staff member stated the only way Resident 1 would leave the facility would be in a body bag. Resident 1 did not find the comment funny. The form did not indicate the state agency was notified of the incident. On 7/26/23 at 11:14 AM Staff 3 (LPN Resident Care Manager) stated if a resident made a comment which could potentially be verbal abuse, the incident should be reported to the state agency. Staff 3 indicated the resident was not able to identify who made the comment and it could have been a resident. Staff 3 stated the resident had dark humor and often joked with staff and other residents and a comment could have been made in a joking manner, but it was not determined who made the comment. Staff 3 acknowledged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-01 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan reflective of mobility needs for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for transfer status. This placed residents at risk for falls. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility 7/24/23 with diagnoses including a history of falls. A [NAME] (CNA guide to resident specific care) revealed the resident's transferring status required two staff with all transfers and the resident required one staff with transfers using a walker. On 7/26/23 at 4:37 PM Staff 5 (CNA) stated she was assigned to work with Resident 13 and was told the resident required one person stand by assist for transfers. Staff 5 reviewed the [NAME] and confirmed the resident's transfer status had conflicting information and she would need to clarify with the nurse. On 7/26/23 at 4:49 PM Staff 4 (LPN Resident Care Manager) reviewed the resident's [NAME] and acknowledged the resident's transferring status had conflicting information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for care plans not reflective of current care needs. Findings include: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including diabetes. Resident 4's Care Plan indicated she/he was to have enhanced barrier precautions related to wound care. The care plan was initiated on 12/22/22. The goal was to prevent the spread of infections. Gloves and gowns were to be worn during care including toileting. On 7/26/2023 at 10:25 AM Staff 6 (CNA) was observed to provide Resident 4 incontinent care. Staff 5 wore gloves but did not wear a gown. On 7/27/23 at 10:23 AM Staff 3 (LPN Resident Care Manager) stated at one time Resident 4 had an open wound and was on enhanced barrier precautions. The resident's wound healed and the care plan was not updated to reflect the resident's current status.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were monitored after allegations of abuse for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1 and 5). This placed residents at risk for unidentified psychosocial harm. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including depression. A Significant incident report form dated 2/27/23 revealed Resident 1 reported a staff member told her/him the only way the resident was going to leave the facility was in a body bag. The resident did not feel the comment was funny. Progress notes revealed the resident was not monitored for behavioral or mood changes after the 2/27/23 reported incident. A 3/3/23 psychological progress note revealed the resident was assessed for depression and for reports that a staff member made a comment to the resident about leaving the facility in a body bag. The resident was upset about the comment but the comment did not contribute to increased depression. On 7/26/23 at 11:14 AM Staff 3 (LPN Resident Care Manager) stated if staff were to monitor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-24 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a qualified professional to direct the activities program for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for unmet activity needs. Findings include: On 2/23/23 at 10:39 AM Staff 16 (Activity Director) stated she had been in the activities position since 8/2022 and did not have an activities certificate. She reported working with Staff 1 (Administrator) to initiate the appropriate certification for her position. A review of the 11/2022 through 2/2023 resident council minutes and the 2/2023 activity schedule revealed Resident 16 was the Activity Director. On 2/23/23 at 3:06 PM Staff 1 stated Staff 16 was hired for activities and had been in the position since 8/2022. Staff 1 acknowledged Staff 16 was not currently certified.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' environment remained free from accident hazards and smoking materials were stored securely for 5 of 5 sampled residents (#s 10, 12, 22, 27 and 39) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include: 1. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including diabetes and weakness. A 2/23/21 comprehensive care plan indicated Resident 10 was at moderate risk for falls and she/he had a history of falls. Interventions included fall mats on both sides of Resident 10's bed. On 2/20/23 at 11:01 AM, 2/22/23 at 7:36 AM and 11:15 AM Resident 10 was in bed with one fall mat up against the wall and the other mat was in the middle of the room approximately five feet away from her/his bed. On 2/22/23 at 11:25 AM Staff 8 (CNA) stated Resident 10's care plan interventions for fall prevention were to have her/his bed in the lowest position and to have fall mats on both sides of the bed. Staff 8 stated Resident 10 had not fallen for a long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-24 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the required annual CNA training and annual performance reviews were completed for 3 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#s 12, 13, and 14) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: On 2/21/23 at 10:47 AM Staff 15 (HR and Payroll) provided the most recent performance reviews for Staff 12 (CNA), Staff 13 (CNA) and Staff 14 (CNA). - Staff 12 was hired on 4/21/18, the provided performance review was dated 1/17/22. - Staff 13 was hired on 7/19/21, the facility was unable to provide a performance review. - Staff 14 was hired on 3/26/14, the facility was unable to provide a performance review. On 2/21/23 at 10:51 AM Staff 15 acknowledged the performance evaluations were not completed annually for Staff 13 and stated she would look for additional documentation for performance reviews and records to show training requirements were met. On 2/24/23 at 10:50 AM Staff 15 (Human Resources and Payroll) provided training certificates for Staff 11, Staff 12, Staff 13 and Staff 14.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed ensure food was labeled and stored in a way to minimize food spoilage, failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for the kitchen refrigerator and ensure dishwasher chemical solution was maintained at correct concentration for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitary conditions. This placed residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings include: 1. On 2/20/23 at 8:37 AM the walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer in the facility's kitchen were observed to contain the following improperly stored items and unsanitary conditions: -15 to 20 individual 1-ounce cups filled with mayonnaise, covered with lids not dated -Three cake deserts individually wrapped not dated. -One chocolate pudding covered not dated. -Three individually wrapped sandwiches not dated. -Three ketchups, three mustards, one barbeque sauce (approximately eight ounces half full) and one Italian dressing with a fill date of 1/18/22 but no discard date found. -The walk-in refrigerator ceiling had multiple dust particles (gray and black all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was a functioning and audible call light system for 1 of 3 wings (Wing 2) reviewed for call lights. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 2/21/23 at 7:10 AM Resident 36 activated her/his call light but the display outside the room did not activate. Resident 36 stated she/he requested Resident 32 activate her/his call light because her/his call light was not working. At 7:10 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) had Resident 36 activate her/his call light and was observed outside the room and revealed a red flashing light which indicated the call light in the bathroom was activated. Staff 1 stated when Resident 36 activated her/his call light the white light should activate outside of the room even if the bathroom light was activated. 2. On 2/20/23 at 1:19 PM room [ROOM NUMBER]'s call light was activated and the audible sound at the nurses' station was heard at a low level when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#36) reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse and psychosocial harm. Findings include: Resident 36 admitted to the facility in 6/2022 with diagnoses including blood clot to the lungs and weakness. A 12/21/22 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 36 had a BIMS score of 15, indicating she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 13 admitted to the facility in 5/2015 with a diagnosis including schizophrenia and had a BIMS score of 15, indicating she/he was cognitively intact. The facility's 1/17/23 investigation revealed Resident 36 reported to Staff 18 she/he was kicked in the left shin by Resident 13. Staff 18 (CMA) assessed Resident 36 for injury and immediately reported the incident to Staff 26 (LPN/charge nurse). There were no witnesses. Upon re-assessment by Staff 26, it was indicated Resident 36 had a slight bruise on her/his left shin. Resident 36 stated she/he had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise a care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#15) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that affects movement). In 2019 Resident 15's family provided a document which contained information related to a mental health diagnoses. The document was scanned into Resident 15's electronic health record. An ankle wound was identified on 6/24/22. Orders were received for treatment. The care plan was to be revised to include the nurses were to ensure Resident 15 wore protective boots at all times and discouraged the use of shoes. A review of the 2/2023 comprehensive care plan identified interventions for daily weights, weights per physician order, an air mattress, pressure ulcer care and cognitive problems due to dementia. The care plan was not revised to include any interventions related to an ankle ulcer and the need for protective boots at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to reassess causes and interventions and provide medications for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#15) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for inappropriate wound care and infections. Findings include: 1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that affects movement) and diabetes. a. Medical records indicated Resident 15 had interventions in place in 2021 to avoid shoes, wear protective boots and instructed licensed nurses to ensure the boots were in place at all times due to previous foot wounds. On 6/24/22 a new wound to Resident 15's ankle was identified and determined to be caused by a shoe. The wound was noted to have a scab. An order dated 6/24/22 instructed staff to apply Betadine (an iodine solution used to protect against infection) twice a day until resolved and to notify the physician if the wound worsened. On 9/14/22 a Skin/Wound note identified an open area on Resident 15's right ankle previously observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor and assess weight loss for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for weight loss. Findings include: Resident 24 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including (sepsis) a blood infection. Resident 24's hospital records indicated a weight of 297 pounds. A facility admission weight dated 9/22/22 indicated Resident 24 weighed 295 pounds. Another weight dated 9/22/22 of 265 pounds was recorded in the medical record and the previous weight of 295 pounds was crossed out by a nurse on 1/23/23 which indicated an error in the electronic record. An RD assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 24's intake was meeting her/his caloric needs and recommended a no added salt diet. Additional weights recorded: -9/30/22 295 pounds -10/4/22 295 pounds -10/5/22 295 pounds -10/15/22 241 pounds -12/19/22 234 pounds No additional weights recorded until: -1/22/23 208 pounds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to have adequate staff available to meet the needs of residents for 1 of 3 wings (Wing 2). This placed residents at risk of unmet needs. Findings include: 1. On 2/22/23 at 11:25 AM Staff 8 (CNA) stated a couple of residents complained of long call light wait times. Staff 8 stated at times answering call lights in a timely was difficult such as during shift changes and meal times. During observations on 2/23/22 at 10:09 AM room [ROOM NUMBER] A's call light was on. The call light monitor at the nurses' station indicated the light was on for 23 minutes and 41 seconds. The call light monitor was observed cotinuously until 10:25 AM whenthe light was on for 35 minutes. At 10:26 AM the call light monitor indicated room [ROOM NUMBER]'s call light was on for 19 minutes. Staff 1 (Administrator) also observed 217's call light time of 19 minutes. In an interview on 2/24/23 at 10:05 AM with Staff 1, Staff 2 (DNS) and Staff 3 (Regional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete, accurate and readily accessible for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#15) reviewed for medications. This place residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease and dementia. In 2019 information was provided to the facility about Resident 15's mental health diagnosis. The information was not included or readily accessible in the record. Resident 15 had orders dated 2/1/23 for Seroquel and Abilify (anti-psychotic medications). The 2/2023 MAR indicated Resident 15 received one dose of Abilify for the month and the Seroquel was administered daily. On 2/21/23 at 2:39 PM Staff 4 (Social Services) acknowledged she was involved in behavior and psychotropic medication review. Staff 4 stated the Seroquel was new and Resident 15's family wanted her/him to take it for bipolar disorder. Staff 4 added Resident 15 had dementia without behavioral disturbances but she was not aware of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVAMERE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| KAHN, KAREN | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 10/01/2008 |
| JUDD, CHASE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 01/03/2022 |
| KOFSTAD, MARY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/13/2024 |
| SIMPSON, ANDREW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 06/01/2024 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385024. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.