No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avamere Transitional Care Of Puget Sound

630 South Pearl Street, Tacoma, WA 98465 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (253) 671-7300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (253) 671-7300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Sep 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$23,319 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $23,319 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-19)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
5018 N 9th St · (253) 683-4277 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6201 6th Ave · (253) 566-9217 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6201 6th Ave · (253) 652-7381 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1248 S Pearl St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.0%14.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight14.3%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%17.7%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication0.0%12.4%18.9%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers20.7%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control41.5%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.0%15.1%17.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.7%19.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.4%13.4%12.0%typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 396 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
77.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.56hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.58hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 77.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 195 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.0%CMS range 53.6–63.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 8.9–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge77.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge73.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 4.1–9.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.771.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.87
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.57
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.17
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.26
RN hoursweekends
34.3%
Total nursing turnover
38.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 53.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.49 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 2.12 to 1.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-25)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development and/or promote healing of PU/PI (Pressure Ulcers/Pressure Injuries) for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident 1) reviewed for PU/PIs. Resident 1 experienced harm when the facility failed to accurately assess, develop/implement/update a resident-centered care plan (CP) for PU/PIs (that included timely interventions consistent with professional standards of care for PU/PI prevention and care), consistently monitor, and accurately follow physician orders (PO) for wound care and prevention and experienced an avoidable worsening of their two coccyx (tailbone) Stage II PU/PIs (partial-thickness skin loss) to a Stage IV PU/PI (full thickness loss of skin with exposed muscle/tendon/bone in the wound bed) and developed an avoidable Deep Tissue Injury (DTI-persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, or purple discoloration where the extent of tissue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for assessments. The failure to ensure accurate assessments placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs and diminished quality of care/quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1>Review of Resident 1's admission Nursing Database-Skin Integrity, dated 12/04/2025, showed they admitted with two wounds on the coccyx, identified as skin tears. Review of a daily skilled progress note, dated 12/08/2025 at 4:14 PM, showed Resident 1 had a PU/PI with a small amount of drainage and dead tissue on the wound bed. The documentation did not indicate the anatomical location, stage, or measurements of the PU/PI. Review of Resident 1's 12/10/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment tool) showed Resident 1 was at risk of developing PU/PIs and had no unhealed PU/PIs. Review of the 12/15/2025 PU/PI Care Area Assessment (CAA-a standardized process for evaluation of each resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatment and medication carts were secured/locked when unattended for 4 of 4 treatment carts (Front North 200 hall, Back North 200 hall, Front South 300 hall, and Back South 300 hall) and for 4 of 4 medication carts (Front North 200 hall, Back North 200 hall, Front South 300 hall, and Back South 300 hall) when reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk for drug diversion and potential loss of medications/treatments.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, dated 2007, showed, In order to limit access to prescription medications, only licensed nurses, pharmacy staff, and those lawfully authorized to administer medications (such as medication aides) are allowed access to medication carts, Medication rooms, cabinets and medication supplies should remain locked when not in use or attended by persons with authorized access. Observations on 09/23/2025 at 6:04 AM showed the Front North 200 hall treatment and medication carts, the Back North 200 hall treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently offer/provide showers and oral care for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 14, 84 and 88) when reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). These failures placed dependent residents at risk for unmet care needs, poor hygiene and diminished quality of life.Findings included . Resident 14Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 14 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of failure to thrive, anxiety (feeling of fear, tension or worry) and neuropathy (nerve damage). During an interview on 09/23/2025 at 8:58 AM, Resident 14 stated they had been at the facility for over a week and had not received a shower. Review of the facility shower sheet showed Resident 14 was to receive showers twice a week. During an interview on 09/25/2025 at 11:19 AM, Staff F, Residential Care Manager (RCM), stated Resident 14 declined showers; however, it was not documented and should have been. Resident 84Review of the EHR showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to provide care in a timely manner and complete activities of daily living for 1 of 4 halls (300 hall) when reviewed for sufficient staffing. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet needs, decreased self-worth and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. During an interview on 09/23/2025 at 8:30 AM, Resident 67 (room [ROOM NUMBER]) stated they had turned their call light on last night and waited over an hour. Resident 67 stated they had gone out into the hall and did not see any staff in the hallways. During an interview on 09/24/2025 at 9:25 AM, Resident 32 (room [ROOM NUMBER]) stated they waited 30 minutes with the call light on to ask for pain medicine last night (09/23/2025) and then another 15 minutes for the nurse to bring it. Resident 32 stated That's a long time when you are hurting. Observation on 09/24/2025 at 9:30 AM showed Resident 51 (room [ROOM NUMBER]) in their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's request for mobility bars for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 93) when reviewed for choices. This failure placed the resident at risk of fear of falling, inability to sleep, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the electronic health record showed Resident 93 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include spinal stenosis (a condition where the space within the spine that houses the spinal cord and nerve roots becomes narrowed), anxiety, and insomnia (a common sleep disorder characterized by difficulty falling or staying asleep). Resident 93 was able to make needs known. During an interview and observation on 09/23/2025 at 10:28 AM, Resident 93 stated they had fallen at home prior to coming to the facility and continued to worry about falling from their bed at the facility. Resident 93 stated they requested mobility bars be added to their bed so they could reposition themselves in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a care conference meeting with a resident or responsible party for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 74) when reviewed for care plans and care planning. This failure placed Resident 74 at risk for unmet needs, not being involved or informed of their plan of care, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 74 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a broken part of the right hip socket and heart failure. Resident 74 was able to communicate needs. During an interview on 09/25/2025 at 12:35 PM, Resident 74 stated they did not recall ever going to a care conference or being asked to attend a care conference. Resident 74's adult child stated they were not invited to go to a care conference and would have liked to have gone to a care conference with their parent. Review of Resident 74's EHR showed a care conference information form dated 09/09/2025 showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a provider order and interventions in place for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 91) when reviewed for a life vest (a device worn under clothing with an attached monitor, designed to protect a person from sudden cardiac arrest/heart stop beating, by monitoring the hearts electrical activity and automatically delivers an electrical shock to correct a dangerous heart rhythm, preventing a potentially fatal event), and failed to ensure care and services were in place to treat a non-pressure skin issue for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 68) when reviewed for general and/or skin conditions. These findings placed residents at risk of unmet needs, worsening conditions, clinical complications, and a decreased quality of life.Resident 91Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 91 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include infection and swelling reaction due to a cardiac/heart device implant/inserted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 88 and 101) when reviewed for respiratory care. Failure to follow physician orders for oxygen (O2) therapy placed the residents at risk for unmet needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 88Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung condition that limits airflow) and diabetes (high blood sugar). Resident 88 was able to make needs known. Observations on 09/23/2025 at 11:55 AM, 09/24/2025 at 1:05 PM and 09/25/2025 at 3:10 PM showed Resident 88 received O2 set to 2 liters (L) per minute via a nasal canula (devise to deliver O2 through a tube into the nose). Review of Resident 88's care plan dated 09/15/2025 showed an intervention for oxygen settings at 1 L continuously. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a timely medication regimen review on admitting to the facility for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 9) when reviewed for medication regimen review. This failure placed the resident at risk of allergic reaction, receiving contraindicated medication, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the electronic health record showed Resident 9 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hepatic encephalopathy (a syndrome that occurs when the liver is unable to properly metabolize toxins, leading to their accumulation in the brain), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), and chronic kidney disease. Resident 9 was able to make needs known. Review of a Drug Regimen Review for New Admissions and Identification of Potential Clinically Significant Medication Issues form, dated 09/03/2025, showed Resident 9 had clinically significant medication issues in the areas of Drug Allergy and Other and required a provider's review.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide non-pharmacological interventions (NPI, health interventions/approaches used instead of medication) and to have pain level parameters in place prior to giving as needed pain medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 45) when reviewed for unnecessary medication use. This failure placed a resident at risk of receiving unnecessary medications, avoidable medication side effects, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 45 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include aftercare following knee surgery, heart failure, and diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). Resident 45 was able to make needs known. Review of the September 2025 medication administration record (MAR) from 09/01/2025 - 09/25/2025 showed Resident 45 had an order with a start date of 08/28/2025 for oxycodone hydrochloride (HCI) (medication used to treat moderate to severe pain)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement the appropriate use of transmission-based precautions (TBP) for 1 of 4 hallways (North front) when reviewed for TBP. This failure placed residents and staff at an increased risk for communicable diseases and a decreased quality of life. Findings included .Observation on 09/23/2025 at 6:15 AM showed room [ROOM NUMBER] with a TBP sign posted on the door. The sign instructed staff to put on an N95 mask, eye protection, a gown and gloves when entering the room and to keep the door closed. Observation and interview on 09/23/2025 at 6:15 AM showed Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), entered room [ROOM NUMBER] in a surgical mask. Staff H did not put on an N95 mask, gown or eye protection. Staff H remained in the room for eight minutes and exited the room with a bag of soiled linens still wearing the surgical mask. Staff H stated the resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] had Covid-19 (a highly contagious respiratory virus). Observation on 09/23/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed all residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing abuse/neglect and lack of protection from abuse.Findings included .Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, revised in 2015, showed that facilities are to report all staff-to-resident allegations of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, sexual and/or physical abuse/assault to the State hotline, report to law enforcement and to document on the State incident reporting log within five days. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol, undated and provided to surveyor on 09/15/2025, under Assessment and Recognition, documented, The nurse will assess the individual and document related findings. Assessment data will include injury assessment (bleeding, bruising, deformity, swelling, etc.), pain assessment, current behavior, . vital signs .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the correct texture of food was served to a resident with a prescribed therapeutic diet for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for prescribed therapeutic diets. This failure placed the resident at risk for choking, aspiration pneumonia (a lung infection that occurs when food, liquids, or other substances are inhaled into the lungs instead of being swallowed), hospitalization, and a decreased quality of life. The facility had corrected the above deficiency prior to the complaint survey, and it is constituted as past non-compliance (the facility was not in compliance at the time the incident occurred; however, there was sufficient evidence the facility corrected the non-compliance after it was identified) and is no longer outstanding. Findings included . Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS, a required assessment tool), dated 03/09/2025 showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of dysphagia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an unexpected death to rule out mistreatment for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 52) and failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 114) when reviewed for Abuse. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse, neglect, avoidable death, retaliation from staff, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 52 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed that Resident 52 admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of essential hypertension (high blood pressure). Review showed that Resident 52 unexpectedly died at the facility. Review of provider's orders showed Resident 52 received amlodipine for high blood pressure to be held if the systolic blood pressure (SBP, top number in a blood pressure reading) was less than 100. Review of the [DATE] medication administrator record (MAR) showed Resident 52 had a blood pressure of 92/49 and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Sets (MDS), an assessment tool, accurately reflected residents' health status and/or care needs for 2 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 107 and 307) reviewed for resident assessment. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 107 Resident 107 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation (abnormal fluttering heartbeat). The resident was able to make needs known. Review of the admission nursing database assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident reported pain level at a 7 out of 10 daily. Review of the medication administration record showed the resident received tramadol (a narcotic pain medication) four times between 07/17/2024 and 07/21/2024 for a reported pain level between 6 out of 10 and 8 out of 10. Review or the providers orders showed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 4 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 113, 44, 108, and 306) reviewed for Care Plan. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified outcomes or goals, inconsistent or lack of interventions, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 113 Resident 113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a recent fall with complications, which resulted in orthopedic surgery to the right knee with external fixation (surgery that used pins and wires to keep bones from moving), and surgery to the right leg. The five-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 07/22/2024, showed the resident was cognitively intact, required the use of a wheelchair due to recent surgery, and had not been diagnosed previously with any mental health conditions. Observation and interview on 07/25/2024 at 1:54 PM showed Resident 113 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Surveyor: Somal, [NAME] Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow provider's orders, ensure medications had safe monitoring and hold parameters, and notify the provider of changes in condition and medication errors for 8 of 10 sampled residents (Residents 52, 44, 206, 8, 112, 1, 107, and 9) when reviewed for Quality of Care. These failures placed residents at risk of decline in condition, lack of timely interventions to prevent death, avoidable side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Blood Pressure Medication Administration> Review of a policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised February 2021, showed the nurse would notify the resident's provider when there had been an accident or incident involving the resident or significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition. Review of a policy titled Blood Pressure, Measuring, revised [DATE], showed hypotension (low blood pressure) was defined as blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a working doorbell for handicap residents visiting the courtyard for 1 of 1 courtyard reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed residents at risk for accidents, anxiety, feelings of entrapment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . During an interview on 07/25/2024 at 1:55 PM, Resident 113 stated both ends of the courtyard had doors that were too heavy for them to open, and that there was a button that no one responded to. They stated the facility was not offering any handicap options for residents, and they were stuck in the courtyard until a staff member came by. Observation on 07/25/2024 showed the courtyard had doors at each end which were heavy and opened into the courtyard. Observation showed a doorbell next to each door. Observation showed pressing the doorbells did not result in staff response. During an interview on 07/30/2024 at 2:49 PM, Staff N, Maintenance Director, stated they were aware the doorbells in the courtyard did not function and was unsure for how long they had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nonpharmacological interventions before administrating as needed pain medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 44 and 1) when reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of taking unnecessary medications, experiencing avoidable side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 44 Review showed the Resident 44 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of essential hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of provider's orders showed orders for oxycodone (a narcotic pain medication) and acetaminophen (a pain medication) to be provided as needed (PRN). Review did not show an order for nonpharmacological interventions (NPI, pain interventions that do not use medication, e.g. massage or repositioning). Review of the July 2024 medication administration record (MAR) showed that Resident 44 received oxycodone four times and acetaminophen three times. Review did not show…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications in 2 of 2 medication rooms (North and South medication rooms) and 2 of 2 medication carts (South High and South Low) when reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving expired medications, ineffective medications, risk for drug diversion and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy Nursing Care Center Pharmacy Policy and Procedure Manual, dated 2007, showed controlled substances (addictive medications) stored in refrigerators should be secured in a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment. Medications requiring refrigeration were to be kept between temperatures of 36 Fahrenheit (F) and 46F. The temperature of refrigerators that stored vaccines should be monitored and recorded twice a day. If using a temperature monitoring device (TMD, a digital data logger) that did not record the minimal and maximal temperatures each day, the facility should document current temperatures twice a day at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections by completing the analyzation of infection control data, identifying trends, and completing follow-up activities in response to those trends for 3 of 3 months (April, May and June 2024) reviewed for Infection Control. The facility also failed to implement transmission-based precautions (TBP) for 1 of 2 halls (200 hall) reviewed for TBP. These failures placed residents and staff at risk for communicable diseases and infections, poor clinical outcomes, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP), revised October 2018, showed that the IPCP would be coordinated and overseen by an infection preventionist (IP), and the facility would follow established general and disease specific guidelines such as those of the Center for Disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-31 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the infection prevention and control program (IPCP) was overseen by a qualified individual with the time and training necessary to properly assess, develop, implement, monitor, and manage the IPCP for the facility, address training requirements, and participate in required committees such as Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for 1 of 1 infection control preventionist (ICP, Staff Z) reviewed for infection preventionist qualifications. This failure placed residents, family members and staff at risk of contracting communicable diseases and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention Control Program, revised October 2018, showed that the IPCP would be coordinated and overseen by an infection preventionist. During an interview on 07/30/2024 at 10:17 AM, Staff CC, Registered Nurse/Resident Care Manager, stated the expectation for the infection preventionist was to track vaccines, do rounds and make sure appropriate isolation precautions were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-31 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide education on the benefits and potential side effects of the Covid-19 vaccination prior to offering the vaccine for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 14, 15, 20 and 34) when reviewed for vaccinations. This failure placed residents and their representatives at risk of not being given the opportunity to make an informed decision regarding their medical care, potential complications of a communicable disease, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed the resident declined the Covid-19 vaccine on 05/22/2024. There was no documentation found that the resident or their representative was educated on the benefits or potential side effects prior to offering the vaccine. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the EHR showed the resident declined the Covid-19 vaccine on 01/08/2024 There was no documentation found…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification of the reason for transfer/discharge to the resident or responsible party and/or to properly notify the Office of State Long-Term Care Ombudsmen (an advocacy group for residents in a nursing home) of discharges to the hospital for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 22, and 75) reviewed for Hospitalization. These failures denied the resident or responsible party knowledge of their rights regarding transfer/discharge from the facility, placed residents at risk for diminished protection from being inappropriately discharged , lack of access to an advocate who can inform them of their options and rights, and ensure that the Offices of the State Long-Term-Care Ombudsmen was aware of the facility practices and activities related to transfers and discharges. Findings included . Resident 22 Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] and the entry tracking record MDS dated [DATE] showed that Resident 22 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed-hold notice in writing, at the time of transfer/discharge to the hospital and/or within 24 hours of transfer/discharge to the hospital for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 22 and 75) reviewed for Hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for a lack of knowledge regarding the right to a bed-hold while they were hospitalized . Findings included . Resident 22 During an interview on 08/16/2023 at 10:02 AM, Resident 22 stated that they did not recall ever being offered a bed hold. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] and the entry tracking record MDS dated [DATE] showed that Resident 22 was transferred from the facility to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the discharge MDS dated [DATE] and the entry tracking record MDS dated [DATE] showed that Resident 22 was transferred from the facility to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement comprehensive person-centered care plans (CPs) for 5 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 22, 24, 69, 18, and 130) whose CPs were reviewed. Failure to develop and implement CPs that were individualized, and accurately reflected resident care needs related to edema/swelling, nail care, use of blood thinning medications, and falls, placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and potential negative outcomes. Findings Included . Resident 22 Review of the 5-Day Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that Resident 22 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of lymphedema (swelling due to buildup of fluid in the body) and was able to make needs known. It further showed that Resident 22 received diuretics (medication that help reduce fluid buildup in the body). Review of Resident 22's physician order dated 08/14/2023 showed that Resident 22 was prescribed Torsemide (a diuretic medication) to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary goods and services to prevent development of avoidable pressure ulcers (PU), and/or promote healing of identified PUs for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 177 and 24) reviewed for pressure injuries. The failure to ensure assessment and ongoing monitoring of PUs were conducted, placed the residents at risk for unidentified wound development/decline, a delay in treatment, infection, and other potential negative outcomes. Resident 177 Resident 177 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the 08/14/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, and demonstrated no behaviors or rejection of care. Resident 177 was assessed with three Stage 3 PUs (Full thickness tissue loss) with one Stage 3 identified as present upon admission. Review of Resident 177's 08/09/2023 admission nursing assessment, showed the resident admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consistently maintain the medication refrigerator temperature log in 2 of 2 medication rooms (North and South) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the residents and/or staff at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medications with unknown potency. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medication, dated 2007, showed that medications requiring refrigeration or temperatures between 36 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 46 degrees F were to be kept in a refrigerator with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring. It further showed, A temperature log or tracking mechanism is maintained to verify the temperature has remained within accepted limits. The temperature of any refrigerator that stores vaccines should be monitored and recorded twice daily. North Medication Room Review of the refrigerator temperature log sheet from 08/01/2023 - 08/16/2023 with AM (morning) and PM (evening) time sections for documentation, showed that there were missing refrigerator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections by completing the collection and analyzation of infection control data, identifying trends, and completing follow-up activities in response to those trends for three of three months (May, June, and July 2023) reviewed for Infection Control. Also, the Facility failed to implement recommended control measures for an active Covid-19 disease outbreak for 07/16/2023 through 08/18/2023 and failed to implement the facility's water management program. These failures placed residents, visitors, and staff at risk for communicable diseases, related complications, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Tracking and trending Review of the facility's policy titled infection prevention and control program, dated October 2018 showed outcome surveillance (incidence and prevalence of healthcare acquired infections) was used as measures of the infection prevention and control program (IPCP)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Antibiotic Stewardship Program for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 61) reviewed for antibiotic use and to promote appropriate use of antibiotics and reduce the risk of antibiotic resistant organisms and unnecessary antibiotic use for 3 of 3 months (May, June, and July 2023) Reviewed for infection control. These failures placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate and/or unnecessary use of antibiotics, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship - Review and surveillance of antibiotic use and outcomes revised December 2016 showed Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented on a facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form to include unit and room number, date symptoms appeared, pathogen identified, site of infection, date of culture, and stop date. Also, that the infection preventionist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Agency within 24 hours and to log the incident in the facility's reporting log as required for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 230) when reviewed for abuse/neglect and/or falls. In addition, the facility failed to report Covid-19 (a highly communicable respiratory infection) cases for 1 of 1 outbreak (Dated 07/16/2023 - 08/18/2023) to the State Agency within 24 hours and log the incident in the facility's reporting log when reviewed for Infection Control. These failures placed the residents at risk for potential unrecognized abuse, spread of infection, delayed investigation, delayed corrective actions, recurrence of the incidents and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 230 Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that Resident 230 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a planned discharge to the community on 08/03/2023 with return not anticipated. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 177 Resident 177 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's physician's orders showed a 08/09/2023 order to administer daptomycin (an antibiotic medication) intravenously (IV) every 24-hours for left upper extremity cellulitis (bacterial skin infection.) Review of Resident 177's 08/14/2023 admission MDS showed the resident received no IV medications during the assessment period (08/08/2023- 08/14/2023.) Review of Resident 177 's August 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR), showed the resident was administered IV daptomycin on 08/09/2023, 08/11/2023, 08/12/2023 and 08/14/2023. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 11:03 AM, Staff C, Resident Care Manager, stated that Resident 177s MDS was inaccurate and needed to be corrected to reflect the administration of IV medication. Reference WAC 388-97-1000 (1)(b) Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 4 of 12 residents (Residents 22, 55, 75 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessment was accurately completed for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 22) reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified mental health care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the 5-Day Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that Resident 22 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of depression. Review of Resident 22's electronic health record (EHR) on 08/16/2023 showed that the resident had a physician order dated 06/28/2023 for Mirtazapine (an antidepressant medication) to be given at bedtime for depression. It further showed that Resident 22 had an order dated 07/25/2023 for Duloxetine (an antidepressant medication) to be given in the morning for depression, anxiety, and fibromyalgia (a disorder that causes pain and tenderness throughout the body). Review of Resident 22's PASRR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan (CP), within 48 hours of admission, that provided the minimum healthcare information necessary to meet residents immediate care needs for 1 of 9 residents reviewed (Resident 177) who had recently admitted to the facility. This failure placed the resident at risk for medical complications, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 177 Resident 177 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 177's 08/09/2023 admission nursing assessment showed the resident had intravenous (IV) access via a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC, a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart) to the right upper arm, had a Stage 3 (Full thickness tissue loss) pressure ulcer (PU) to the sacrum, and a Stage I PU (non-blanchable redness over a bony prominence) to their left heel. On 08/16/2023 at 8:56 AM, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans (CPs) were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected residents' care needs for 3 of 15 residents (Residents 55, 72 and 26) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 55 Resident 55 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 55's Physician's orders showed a 07/12/2023 order to apply Tubigrip (a tubular bandage containing elastic fibers that provides compression) to the left lower extremity in the AM and remove at bedtime. Review of Resident 55's activities of daily living CP, initiated 06/29/2023, showed staff were directed to apply TED hose (stockings that provide graduated compression) to the resident's lower extremities in the AM and remove at bedtime, for edema management. During an interview on 08/17/2023 at 10:57 AM, Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse/Resident Care Manager (LPN/RCM),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 3 of 15 sample residents (Residents 177, 55 and 26) reviewed. This failure of the facility to obtain, follow, implement and/or clarify physicians' orders when indicated, and to only sign for tasks that were completed, placed residents at risk for medication and treatment errors, and other potential adverse outcomes. Findings included . Resident 177 Resident 177 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's physician's orders showed Resident 177 had a 08/10/2023 order for oxycodone 5mg every four hours as needed for a pain level of 5-7 out of 10, and oxycodone 10 mg every four hours as needed for a pain level of 8-10 out of 10. Review of Resident 177's August 2023 MAR showed on the following occasions the resident had a pain levels between 5-7 and was administered 10 mg of oxycodone instead of 5 mgs as ordered: on 08/15/2023 at 4:55 AM with a pain level of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for one of one resident (Resident 24) reviewed for ADLs. Failure to provide Resident 24 who was dependent on staff for grooming placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of care and diminished quality of life. Resident 24 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of stroke with hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). Resident 24's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], showed the resident required extensive assistance with dressing and personal hygiene. Observation and interview on 08/15/2023 at 11:44 AM, showed Resident 24 lying in bed with short hair above their ears. Resident 24 stated that they were unhappy with the recent haircut they had received 2 days prior. Resident 24 further stated that their hair had become so matted in the back of their head it required the facility beautician to cut it. Resident 24 stated they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 69 Observation and interview on 08/15/2023 at 12:32 PM, showed Resident 69 sat in their wheelchair next to their bed with their spouse. Resident 69 had bruising noted to both of their forearms and the resident stated that they bruise very easily. Review of Resident 69's Electronic Health Record on 08/15/2023 at 12:37 PM, showed an order for an anticoagulant (medication the keeps the blood from clotting) every evening for 30 days with a start date of 07/28/2023. Review on 08/16/2023 at 3:15 PM of Resident 69s Electronic Health Record showed an order to monitor/document/report to the provider any signs or symptoms of anticoagulant complications to include bruising and document a plus sign if present and a negative sign if not present. Review on 08/16/2023 at 3:22 PM of Resident 69's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for 08/01/2023 through 08/16/2023 showed check marks for each shift, no plus or negative signs were used. Review of Resident 69s Electronic Health Record on 08/16/2023 at 3:22PM, showed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe resident environment was maintained, free of accident hazards, for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 177 and 31) reviewed for accidents. The failure to ensure resident equipment was safe, functional and in good repair, placed residents at risk for avoidable falls, fractures, pain and other potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Resident 177 During an interview on 08/16/2023 at 8:59 AM, Resident 177 reported that the footrests on their wheelchair were set to different heights and the left footrest would not lock into the straight position. According to Resident 17, when they pushed their feet down on the footrests to reposition themselves in the wheelchair, the offset height of the footrests caused unequal application of pressure and resulted in their wheelchair tilting forward/ forward right or the left footrest would swing out to the left. Resident 177 indicated this caused them lose balance and plop back down onto the wheelchair.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enteral nutrition (the delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube directly into the stomach or small intestine) was administered in accordance with provider's orders and professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 23) reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to have a system in place which ensured the amount of enteral formula (liquid food products) a resident received, was reconciled with the amount they were ordered to receive. This prevented staff from identifying that the facility consistently administered Resident 23 less than the ordered amount of enteral formula and placed the resident at risk for inadequate nutrition, hydration, and other adverse outcomes. Findings included . Resident 23 Resident 23 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the 07/31/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), the resident had diagnoses of malnutrition (occurs when the body doesn't get enough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Intravenous (IV) services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 177) reviewed for IV therapy. The facility failed to provide Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC, a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart) care, maintenance and monitoring to include changing needleless injection caps, flushes, dressing changes, monitoring the external length to verify the line had not migrated, and monitoring insertion site for signs and symptoms of infection. These failures placed the resident at risk for loss of vascular access, infection, and other potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Resident 177 Resident 177 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's physician's orders showed a 08/09/2023 order to administer IV antibiotics (antibacterial medication) via PICC every 24-hours,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure freedom from unnecessary pain medication for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 22) reviewed for Unnecessary Medication. Failure to provide non-pharmacological (approaches, therapies, or treatments that do not involve drugs) interventions prior to giving as needed pain medications placed residents at risk for side-effects related to the medication, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the 5-Day Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that Resident 22 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include fibromyalgia (a disorder that causes pain and tenderness throughout the body) and was able to make needs known. It further showed that Resident 22 received opioids (a class of drugs used to reduce pain). Review of the July 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 07/01/2023 - 07/31/2023 showed that Resident 22 had an order with a start date of 06/05/2023 for acetaminophen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary antidepressant medications for 1 of 5 residents (Residents 22) reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Failure to ensure Resident 22's behaviors were consistently monitored and documented placed the resident at risk for receiving unnecessary medications, adverse side effects and poor quality of life. Findings included . Resident 22 Review of the 5-Day Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that Resident 22 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of depression. It further showed that Resident 22 received antidepressant medication and was able to make needs known. Review of Resident 22's electronic health record (EHR) on 08/16/2023 showed that the resident had a physician order dated 06/28/2023 for Mirtazapine (an antidepressant medication) to be given at bedtime for depression. It further showed that Resident 22 had an order dated 07/25/2023 for Duloxetine (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-11-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow prepared menus and ensure any changes were reviewed with the registered dietician when reviewed for kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving adequate nutritional intake, decrease in weight, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the menu for lunch on 09/25/2025 showed parmesan chicken, sweet potato, cauliflower, bread roll, and seasonal fresh fruit as the main meal. Observation on 09/25/2025 at 11:47 AM showed the facility cook serving chicken breast in an orange sauce, sweet potato, green beans, and canned mandarin oranges. Observation showed bread rolls were not provided. Observation of the facility provided test lunch tray on 09/25/2025 at 12:10 PM showed chicken in a sweet orange sauce, sweet potatoes, green beans, and canned mandarin oranges. A bread roll was not provided. During an interview on 09/25/2025 at 12:43 PM, Staff N, Registered Dietician, stated they oversaw the kitchen, the kitchen should follow the provided menus when possible, and any menu…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$23,319 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $23,319 — penalty dated 2026-03-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVAMERE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of EugeneEugene, OR 1 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of LebanonLebanon, OR 2 of 5Avamere At Pacific RidgeTacoma, WA 2 of 5Avamere Health Services Of Rogue ValleyMedford, OR 2 of 5Avamere Olympic Rehabilitation Of SequimSequim, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation At Park WestSeattle, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of IssaquahIssaquah, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Oregon CityOregon City, OR 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of ShorelineSeattle, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation of BurienBurien, WA 2 of 5Avamere Riverpark Of EugeneEugene, OR 2 of 5Avamere Transitional Care At SunnysideSalem, OR 3 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of HillsboroHillsboro, OR 4 of 5Avamere Court At KeizerKeizer, OR 4 of 5Avamere Crestview Of PortlandPortland, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation At RidgemontPort Orchard, WA 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of ClackamasGladstone, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Junction CityJunction City, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of King CityTigard, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of NewportNewport, OR 4 of 5Richmond Beach RehabShoreline, WA 4 of 5The PEARL AT KRUSE WAYLake Oswego, OR 5 of 5Avamere At Three FountainsMedford, OR 5 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Cascade ParkVancouver, WA 5 of 5Queen Anne HealthcareSeattle, WA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MIDCAP FINCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/22/2010
CAVALLO, GLENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2025
FEAKIN, CODYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FUNDERBERG, MICHELLEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
GARCIA, ROBERTOIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2026
INSKEEP, TODDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/21/2022
KOFSTAD, MARYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/13/2024
REID, MISTYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2025
STAPLES, CAROLYNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
STRUNK, COLBYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
VANDERZANDEN, CARRIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
AVAMERE HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2005
AVAMERE SKILLED ADVISORS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2005
FANUNAL, LORIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2023
FISHER, TONYAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/19/2026
FOWLER, KATHERINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
JOHNSON, CATHERINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2023
OKOLI, IKEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/06/2023
PRESLEY, YOLANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
RODERICK, GLENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
SCHMITZ, BRADLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2023
SIMPSON, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2024
SNAPMEDTECH,INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/08/2025
DAVIS, JULIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
GAMES, KIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
THRONE, CINDYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/10/2025
WAGNER, SHERRIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 51 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 15%Medicare 32%Other / private 53%

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$610per resident / day
operating cost
$18,550per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$617per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505529. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next