No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Queen Anne Healthcare

2717 Dexter Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (206) 284-7012 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (206) 284-7012 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 30 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
701 N 34th St, Suite 200
Pharmacy
224 Nickerson St · (206) 946-8157 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
587 N 34th St
Park
2600 2nd Ave N · (206) 684-4075 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
717 N 36th St · (206) 428-7644

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.0%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.4%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.1%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.7%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.6%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.3%22.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.0%15.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.9%19.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit2.7%13.4%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.021.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.601.521.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
30.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.47U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 30.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.4%CMS range 28.1–56.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.7–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge30.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge30.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.2–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.58
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.84
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.84
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.18
RN hoursweekends
38.2%
Total nursing turnover
21.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 94.5 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.42 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.84 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.08 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.52 to 1.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-05)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-03)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medication evaluation and a physician order were obtained for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 103), reviewed for self-administration of medication. This failure placed the resident at risk for inaccurate and unsafe medication administration, adverse side effects, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, dated November 2025, showed, Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate for the resident. If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and the care plan.Review of the medical diagnoses sheet printed on 04/30/2026 showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate and resolve a grievance for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 68), reviewed for grievances. The failure to initiate, investigate, and resolve grievances for missing personal item placed the resident at risk for feelings of frustration, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Grievance/Complaint Policy and Procedure, updated on 03/20/2026, showed, Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, loss of property, or any other concerns that can not be immediately resolved regarding his or her stay at this facility.In an interview on 05/04/2026 at 8:31 AM, Resident 68 stated that they were missing a blue sweater in January 2026 and that staff did not put their name on it when they took it to laundry. Resident 68 further stated that they did not remember if they spoke to the Social Worker (SW) about it and that their sweater…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed accurately for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for pressure ulcers (bedsore). The failure to ensure accurate assessments for turning/repositioning program placed the resident at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.20.1, dated October 2025, showed, .an accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources, some of which are mandated by regulations. Those sources must include the resident and direct care staff on all shifts, and should also include the resident's medical record, physician, and family, guardian and/or other legally authorized representative, or significant other as appropriate or acceptable. It is important to note here that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2), reviewed for comprehensive care plan. The failure to develop a care plan for diabetes mellitus (a disease where the body cannot properly regulate blood sugar levels) placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, reviewed in June 2025, showed, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven (7) days of the completion of the required MDS [Minimum Data Set -an assessment tool] assessment (Admission, Annual or Significant Change in Status), and no more than 21 days after admission.Review of the admission record printed on 05/05/2026 showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was discarded upon reaching its discard date and to properly label and store medications in accordance with current accepted professional standards for 2 of 3 medication carts (Second Floor Medication Cart 1 & First Floor Medication Cart 2), reviewed for medication labeling and storage. These failures placed the residents at risk of receiving compromised and ineffective medications.Findings included .Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, showed, Labeling of medications and biologicals dispensed by the pharmacy is consistent with applicable federal and state requirements and currently accepted pharmaceutical [medicine] practices .Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g.[example], needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial.Multi-dose vials that are not opened or accessed are discarded according to the manufacturer's expiration date.SECOND FLOOR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain food safety and services in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 11 staff (Staff O & Staff K), reviewed for food safety. The failure to perform hand hygiene before and after serving food and not covering food items during meal delivery placed the residents at risk for food-borne illness (caused by ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), food contamination and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand washing/ hand hygiene, dated October 2025, showed, This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of healthcare-associated infections. Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Control for In-Room Dining Meal Service, revised in December 2023, showed, .hand wash prior to distributing meals .if you physically touch .their [residents'] belongings .and/or are assisting with a meal tray set-up . Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were accurate for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 103), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for medical complications and unmet care needs.Findings included.Review of the April 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Resident 103 had an order for Albuterol sulfate inhaler (an inhaler used to open the airways to increase air flow to the lungs) three times a day at 8:00 AM, at 2:00 PM and at 9:00 PM that was documented as administered daily from 04/28/2026 to 04/30/2026.Review of the April 2026 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed Resident 103 had an order for SMP [Self-Medication Program] for Albuterol Sulfate and to document the following: can patient [resident] administer on her own? . does patient ask for inhaler at the right time. does patient know the right dosage. does patient know what medication is for? The TAR showed that the SMP for the Albuterol was signed as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- precaution to protect residents from Multidrug-Resistant Organism [MDRO-a germ that is resistant to medications that treat infections]) for 1 of 7 Staff (Staff E), reviewed for infection control. This failure placed the residents, visitors, and staff at an increased risk for infection and related complications.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 03/21/2024, showed, .the facility will implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP mask, Gown, gloves) for residents with colonization of an MDRO during high-contact care activities and for resident with wounds requiring dressing changes or indwelling [residing within or being permanently placed inside the body] medical devices for the duration of the stay or when the wound is resolved and/or the indwelling device is discontinued.Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) online document titled, Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to accurately assess a surgical wound placed the resident at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.19.1, dated October 2024, showed, .an accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources, some of which are mandated by regulations. Those sources . include the resident's medical record . The RAI manual further showed, if a pressure ulcer [or pressure injury-wounds that occur from prolonged pressure on the skin] is surgically closed with a flap or graft [a body tissue used to cover another body area], it should be coded as a surgical wound and not as a pressure ulcer. If the flap or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were evaluated, assessed, and obtained a physician order for safe administration of medications for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 30 & 48), reviewed for self-medication administration. The failure to complete a self-administration of medication assessment and obtain a physician's order placed the residents at risk for medication errors, adverse medication interactions, and complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, revised in February 2001, showed, Residents have the right to self-administer medications. It showed, As part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate for the resident. The policy further showed, Any medications found at the bedside that are not authorized for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 2 of 25 residents (Residents 89 & 190), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to ensure accurate assessments regarding discharge status and insulin (medication/hormone that regulates blood sugar levels) injections placed the residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.19.1, dated October 2024, showed, .an accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources, some of which are mandated by regulations. Those sources must include the resident and direct care staff on all shifts, and should also include the resident's medical record, physician, and family, guardian and/or other legally authorized representative, or significant other as appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR or PASRR-an assessment used to identify people [residents] referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], intellectual disabilities, or related conditions are not inappropriately placed in nursing facilities for long term care) Coordinator after a significant change in status occurred for 1 of 7 residents (Resident 7), reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, PASRR Policy, revised on 03/22/2024, showed, The PASRR determines that individuals are admitted appropriately to the nursing facility. It identifies people who have an intellectual disability or related concern, or a serious mental health illness, ensuring they receive the services needed. Resident 7 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for oxygen were in place and/or followed according to professional standards of practice for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 85 & 12), reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, and related respiratory complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revised in October 2010, showed The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration . Oxygen therapy is administered by way of an oxygen mask, nasal cannula [flexible tubing that sits inside the nostrils and delivers oxygen], and/or nasal catheter [flexible rubber or plastic tube with several holes near the tip inserted in the nostril] . Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered. RESIDENT 85 Resident 85 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was followed and/or clarified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 194), reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed the resident at risk for receiving incorrect medication dosage and formula, adverse side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised in April 2019, showed medications should be administered in accordance with the prescriber's orders. The policy further showed that the individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. Review of Resident 194's physician orders showed an order for Ferrous Sulfate (iron supplement) oral tablet delayed release 324 milligrams (mg-unit of measurement) initiated on 01/18/2025 to be given one time a day every other day. Observation on 01/30/2025 at 8:39 AM, showed Staff H,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- precaution to protect residents from multidrug-resistant organism [a germ that is resistant to medications that treat infections]) practices were followed for 1 of 9 residents (Resident 72), reviewed for infection control. In addition, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and proper glove use were followed for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 12), reviewed for wound care, and failed to ensure clean linens were carried appropriately for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 6), reviewed for laundry services. These failures placed the residents, staff, and visitors at an increased risk for infection and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 03/21/2024, showed, PPE [Personal Protective Equipment-equipment [gown, gloves, mask] worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause illness] for enhanced barrier precautions is only necessary when performing high-contact care activities. It showed that that high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the influenza vaccine (used to prevent influenza [an infection of the nose, throat, and lungs]), was provided for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 10), reviewed for immunizations. This failure placed the resident at risk of acquiring, transmitting, and/or experiencing potentially avoidable complications from influenza disease. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Influenza Vaccine, revised in March 2022, showed, Between October 1st [first] and March 31st [thirty first] each year, the influenza vaccine shall be offered to residents and employees, unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated, or the resident or employee has already been immunized. Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the facility's document titled, Vaccination History and Consent, dated 01/09/2025, showed that Resident 10's representative consented to receive the influenza vaccine on 01/12/2025. It further showed that a nurse signed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the COVID-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing and could result in impairment or death) vaccine was provided for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 10), reviewed for immunizations. The failure to provide the COVID-19 vaccination placed the resident at risk for contracting the COVID-19 virus and related complications. Findings included . Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention online document titled, Staying Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines, dated 10/03/2024, showed that everyone ages 6 months and older should get a 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine. It showed that people ages 12-64 years are up to date when they have received one dose of the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine. It further showed that people ages 65 years and older are up to date when they have received two doses of any 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine 6 months apart. Review of the facility's policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in residents' personal refrigerators were labeled with use by date, discarded after use by date, and refrigerators had internal thermometer for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 & 2) and for 1 of 2 resident refrigeration units (First Floor Resident Refrigeration Unit), reviewed for personal food safety. In addition, the facility failed to ensure refrigerator temperatures were monitored and maintained for 2 of 3 refrigerators (Resident 2's Personal Refrigerator & First Floor Resident Refrigeration Unit). These failures placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Personal Food Storage, revised in December 2016, showed that food or beverage brought in from outside sources for storage in facility pantries, refrigeration units, or personal room refrigeration units will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) was free from a significant medication error. The failure to clarify a physician's order for an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication placed the resident at risk for excessive bleeding, a decline in medical condition, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of an entry tracking Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 12/29/2023 showed Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], under medications showed, you may resume Apixaban 5 [five] mg [milligram] on post op [post operative] day #5 (1/2/2024). The discharge summary showed to continue these medications which have not changed Apixaban 5 mg take 1 tablet (5 mg) every 12 hours. Review of the December 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Resident 1 received Apixaban 5 mg at 8:00 PM on 12/29/2023, and from 12/30/2023 to 12/31/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for 5 of 21 residents (Residents 2, 4, 21, 60 & 16), reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The failure to develop and implement care plans to offer fluids, for use hearing aids and/or use of diuretics (medicines that help reduce edema [fluid buildup in the body]) placed the residents at risk for possible adverse effects and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised in December 2016, showed that the comprehensive care plan includes measurable objectives and timetable to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. OFFERING FLUIDS RESIDENT 2 Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed the resident required one person extensive assist with eating and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected residents' care needs for 4 of 21 residents (Residents 31, 52, 66 & 58) whose care plans were reviewed. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised in December 2016, showed that assessments of residents were ongoing and care plans were revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. The Interdisciplinary team must review and update the care plan when there has been significant change in the resident's condition, when the desired outcome was not met, when the resident have been readmitted to the facility from a hospital and at least quarterly in conjunction with the required quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. RESIDENT 31 Resident 31 admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice to properly care and clean respiratory equipment for 4 of 6 residents (Residents 77, 66, 87 & 49), reviewed for respiratory care. The failure to properly label/store suction tubing/tip (a medical device used to remove mucus/saliva/blood obstructing a person's airway), masks for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP- helps with breathing)/Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP-helps with breathing) placed the residents at risk for respiratory infections, and related complications. Findings included . USE OF SUCTION MACHINE Resident 77 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of a physician order dated 08/24/2023, showed that the oral suction equipment needs to be changed weekly/PRN (as needed) and dated when opened every night shift on Thursdays. Review of the airway clearance care plan revised on 08/24/2023, directed the staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored were labeled/dated when opened and/or discard food products on or before the used by date in 1 of 1 walk-in refrigerators (main kitchen walk-in refrigerator) and 1 of 1 kitchen dry storage. This failure placed the residents at risk for developing food borne illness (caused by ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Food Safety and Sanitation, dated May 2017 showed, Food protection measures that are performed by the food service department include . All time and temperature control for safety (TCS) leftovers are labeled, covered, and dated when stored .Canned and dry foods without expiration dates are used within six months of delivery or according to the manufacturer's guideline. MAIN KITCHEN WALK-IN REFRIGERATOR On 10/15/2023 at 8:27 AM, joint observation of the main kitchen walk-in refrigerator with Staff P, Cook, showed the following: - An open bag of cheese with quarter left in it had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure soiled linens were bagged/handled properly for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 49 & 297), failed to implement hand hygiene during meal tray delivery for 1 of 8 residents (Resident 91), and during wound care observations for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 52), reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents at risk for facility acquired or healthcare-associated infections, and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revised in August 2019, showed the facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent spread of infections. That all personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. Additionally, the facility policy showed that staff was to use alcohol-based hand rub and/or wash their hands using soap and water before handling clean or soiled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights (an alerting device for staff to assist residents in need) were within reach for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 22 & 4), reviewed for accommodation of needs. This failure placed the residents at risk for delayed care, accidents/falls, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of facility's policy titled, Answering the Call Light, revised in October 2010, showed, when the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. RESIDENT 22 Resident 22 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 10/05/2023, showed Resident 22 required extensive assist with bed mobility, transfer, walking, dressing, personal hygiene, and required total assist with toileting. Review of the fall care plan revised on 07/20/2023, showed Resident 22 was at moderate risk for falls related to cognitive/memory problems,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure handrail (support bar) in the bathroom was maintained and was safe to use for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 4) reviewed for use of assistive device. This failure placed the resident at risk for accidents/falls, injury, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Maintenance, revised in May 2009, showed the purpose for maintenance was to provide a safe environment for residents and preventative maintenance will occur throughout the year. Review of the facility's policy titled, Preventative Maintenance, revised in October 2010, showed the Electronic Preventative Maintenance System TELS (web-based software program) will be utilized to ensure all components are being reviewed according to schedule and TELS will be reviewed weekly by the Executive Director to ensure compliance with this documentation. Resident 4 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 3 of 22 residents (Residents 66, 246 & 52) reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The failure to ensure accurate assessments regarding skin conditions placed the residents at risk for unidentified or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.17.1, dated October 2019, showed Accuracy of Assessment means that the appropriate, qualified health professionals correctly document the resident's medical, functional, and psychosocial problems and identify resident strengths to maintain or improve medical status, functional abilities, and psychosocial status using the appropriate RAI (i.e., comprehensive, quarterly, annual, significant change in status). The Observation Period (also known as the Look-back period) is the time-period over which the resident's condition or status is captured by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide personal hygiene per plan of care for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 16), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This failure placed the resident at risk for poor hygiene, decreased self-esteem, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, Supporting, revised in March 2018, showed appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene. Resident 16 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Alzheimer's disease (a disease that affects how the brain works and how a person thinks). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 08/29/2023, showed Resident 16 had impaired cognition and required one-person extensive assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement wound care recommendation for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 52), reviewed for skin condition. This failure placed the resident at risk for delayed wound healing, medical complication, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Ulcers [bed sore]/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol, revised in April 2018, showed the physician will order pertinent wound treatments, including pressure reduction surfaces. The policy also showed that the physician will guide the care plan as appropriate, especially when wounds are not healing as anticipated or new wounds develop despite existing interventions. Resident 52 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 52's quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 09/11/2023, showed the resident was cognitively intact. Observation on 10/15/2023 at 10:29 AM, showed Resident 52 had a foam wound dressing on their right elbow.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary supervision for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for elopement. The failure to provide the necessary supervision for Resident 1 resulted in an elopement and placed the resident at risk for injury. Findings included . Review of the admission nursing data base assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included dementia (impaired memory). The assessment also showed Resident 1 had a history of wandering. Review of the elopement assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 1 could walk without assist and was at moderate risk of elopement. Review of the facility's investigation titled, Event Form dated 10/07/2023, showed Resident 1 was last seen in the facility on 10/07/2023 at 4:40 PM in the dining room while waiting for dinner to be served. The event form showed that at 5:20 PM that evening, an unnamed staff noted that Resident 1 had left the dining room. At 5:45 PM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVAMERE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.0+2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 52.6+2.4 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of EugeneEugene, OR 1 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of LebanonLebanon, OR 2 of 5Avamere At Pacific RidgeTacoma, WA 2 of 5Avamere Health Services Of Rogue ValleyMedford, OR 2 of 5Avamere Olympic Rehabilitation Of SequimSequim, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation At Park WestSeattle, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of IssaquahIssaquah, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Oregon CityOregon City, OR 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of ShorelineSeattle, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation of BurienBurien, WA 2 of 5Avamere Riverpark Of EugeneEugene, OR 2 of 5Avamere Transitional Care At SunnysideSalem, OR 3 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of HillsboroHillsboro, OR 4 of 5Avamere Court At KeizerKeizer, OR 4 of 5Avamere Crestview Of PortlandPortland, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation At RidgemontPort Orchard, WA 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of ClackamasGladstone, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Junction CityJunction City, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of King CityTigard, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of NewportNewport, OR 4 of 5Avamere Transitional Care Of Puget SoundTacoma, WA 4 of 5Richmond Beach RehabShoreline, WA 4 of 5The PEARL AT KRUSE WAYLake Oswego, OR 5 of 5Avamere At Three FountainsMedford, OR 5 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Cascade ParkVancouver, WA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ARISO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2013
ARI OPERATIONS, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2013
AVAMERE GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2013
KARL RICKARD MILLER JR REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2013
MILLER, KARLIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2013
MIDCAP FINCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 06/25/2013
ADAMS, NANCYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
CAVALLO, GLENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2025
FEAKIN, CODYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FUNDERBERG, MICHELLEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
HILL, KEVINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/12/2022
HOSKINS, TONIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2025
INSKEEP, TODDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/21/2022
KOFSTAD, MARYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/13/2024
MUNRO, JOLYNNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
OKOLI, IKEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2025
POLSON, JUSTINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/10/2025
POWELSON, MICHELEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2015
REID, MISTYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2025
SANDERS, AMANDAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2025
SIMPSON, ANDREWIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
STRUNK, COLBYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
VANDERZANDEN, CARRIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
AVAMERE HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2013
AVAMERE SKILLED ADVISORS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2013
DOSS, ERINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/09/2025
FANUNAL, LORIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2023
FOWLER, KATHERINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
LOTT, KRISTIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2018
NEWMAN, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2023
NOVAIS, JAIMEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1996
PRESLEY, YOLANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
GAMES, KIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
GRIFFITH, JOSHUAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 63 rows in the source record cover these 34 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 4%Other / private 32%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$488per resident / day
operating cost
$14,826per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$416per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505204. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next