No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avamere Rehabilitation Of King City

16485 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, OR 97224 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 148 certified beds · (503) 620-5141 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (503) 620-5141 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Dec 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
11820 SW King James Pl Ste 30 · (503) 620-3606 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
15685 SW 116th Ave · (503) 639-7377 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
15705 SW 116th Ave · (503) 968-8991 · Call to confirm hours
Park
17255 SW Jurgens Ave · (503) 692-2000 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
11545 SW Durham Rd · (971) 329-6661

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.2%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.0%4.7%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%1.4%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.5%2.0%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.3%4.9%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.0%20.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.1%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%5.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.7%21.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.3%13.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.3%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.2%81.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.1%21.4%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.4%16.1%12.0%better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.7%CMS range 40.1–68.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 5.6–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.711.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.75
RN hours/ resident / day
0.42
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
39.8%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 148 beds and averages 64.8 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 83 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.09 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-05)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to respond timely to a change of condition for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for a decline in overall functioning. Findings include:The facility's 3/2018 Acute Condition Changes-Clinical Protocol policy documented the nurse shall assess and document/report the following baseline information: vital signs, neurological status, current pain level, level of consciousness, and onset, duration and severity of condition. Resident 4 was re-admitted to the facility in 12/2025 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and opioid use. Resident 4's Quarterly MDS dated 1/2026 documented a BIMS score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 4's assessment also indicated she/he had chronic pain.The 11/25/25 Blood Pressure Summary Report documented Resident 4's blood pressure was 86/53 at 5:00 AM by Staff 6 (LPN). Resident 4's 11/25/25 Progress Note at 6:50 AM, indicated Staff 6 charted Resident 4's blood pressure as 70/50. Staff 6 called…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to acquire the correct route for an emergency (Narcan) medication for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. This placed residents at risk for not receiving the correct route for their emergency medication. Findings include: Resident 4 was re-admitted to the facility in 12/2025 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, diabetes and opioid use. Resident 4's 11/2025 Physician Orders included an order for naloxone HCL (Narcan-an antidote medication for opioids) nasal liquid 4mg/0.1ML to be administered in both nostrils as needed for decreased responsiveness. On 2/19/26 at 12:34 PM, observations of the facility's emergency kit found Narcan as an intravenous route rather than the nasal route as prescribed for Resident 4. On 2/20/26 at 2:46 PM, Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the facility did not have the correct Narcan route administration (nasal) for Resident 4.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activity program for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 4, 5, and 20) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life. Findings include:The facility's 11/2025 Activities Policy revealed the activities program was provided to support the well-being of residents and to encourage both independence and community interaction. The facility provided an activities program that addressed the intellectual, social, spiritual, creative, and physical needs, capabilities, and interests of each resident. 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and dementia. Resident 4's Activities Care Plan, revised on 7/11/25, indicated the following: -Resident 4 liked music, pet therapy, one-on-one conversations, reminiscing, stuffed animals, gardening, flowers, and birds. -Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#74) reviewed for dignity and respect. This placed residents at risk for lessened quality of life. Findings include:Resident 74 readmitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including depression and anxiety.A 9/11/24 Facility Reported Incident indicated on 9/9/24 an incident between Resident 74 and Staff 9 (Former Medical Records) occurred outside in the garden area of the facility. Staff 8 (Housekeeping Manager) heard Staff 9 call Resident 74 a Goddamn fucking liar. The incident was witnessed by several residents and Staff 11 (Activities Director).The facility incident report indicated on 9/9/24 Resident 74 was outside in the garden. Resident 74 and Staff 9 were heard arguing about a plant that was allegedly uprooted and thrown in the garbage by the resident. Resident 74 denied the allegation and indicated another resident asked her/him to uproot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to include and inform residents in advance of a change in pain medication for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#60) reviewed for pain. This placed the residents at risk for the inability to participate in their plan of care for pain management. Findings Include:Resident 60 admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with a diagnosis of Atherosclerosis (hardening of arteries) of left leg with rest pain.Resident 60's 7/15/25 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact.Resident 60's 11/10/25 Physician Order indicated Resident 60's morphine was to be changed from TID to BID.Resident 60's health record revealed no evidence the decrease in morphine was discussed with the resident.A Progress Note dated 11/15/25 completed by Staff 20 (RN) indicated Resident 60 expressed frustration regarding recent medication changes and those changes were made without her/his consent.On 12/1/25 at 12:54 PM Resident 60 reported her/his morphine pain medication was recently reduced and reported she/he was not included in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide mobility bars as ordered for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#16) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This placed residents at risk for loss of ability to reposition independently. Findings include:Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 1/2024 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus. Resident 16's 8/5/25 physician order indicated the use of bilateral bed mobility bars.Resident 16's Care Plan, revised on 9/3/25, revealed bilateral mobility bars were to be used to increase resident participation with bed mobility.Resident 16's 11/2025 Annual MDS revealed Resident 16 was cognitively intact and required one-person assistance with mobility.Multiple observations from 12/1/25 through 12/4/25 between the hours of 11:01 AM to 3:33 PM revealed there was one mobility bar on the right side of Resident 16's bed.On 12/1/25 at 11:01 AM and 12/3/25 at 1:29 PM Resident 16 stated she/he was told she/he would have two mobility bars placed on her/his bed, but was only provided with one mobility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide nonpharmacological interventions prior to the use of a PRN psychotropic medication and provide a rationale for indications for use of a PRN psychotropic medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medication use and adverse side effects. Findings include:Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with diagnoses including dementia. The resident's care plan for cognitive impairment, updated on 8/9/25, indicated behavioral disturbance and anxiety. Behavioral interventions included: assessing needs, creating a safe environment, offering activities, and reassuring the resident. The 10/9/25 Quarterly MDS identified Resident 2 was assessed to have no behaviors. Resident's 2's 11/2025 MAR revealed an order for PRN lorazepam (anti-anxiety) every four hours as needed for agitation, anxiety, restlessness, or nausea. The MAR indicated the PRN lorazepam was administered 20 times. No evidence or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to evaluate and manage increased pain after a pain medication change for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#60) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at risk for increased and unmanaged pain. Findings include:Resident 60 admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with a diagnosis of Atherosclerosis (hardening of arteries) of left leg with rest pain.Resident 60's 7/15/25 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact, had almost constant pain and received scheduled and PRN pain medication.Resident 60's 10/17/25 Pain Care Plan included to attempt non-medication interventions prior to administration of pain medication, provide pain medications per the physician's orders, provide diversional activities, and to report complaints of pain to the nurse.The 10/17/25 Pain Evaluation specified Resident 60 received scheduled and PRN pain medication. The pain was reported as neuropathic, aching and burning in her/his lower back and left lower extremity. The pain was almost constant and was rated 7 out of 10 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively assess and develop mood and behavior interventions specific to expression of suicidal ideations for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#47) reviewed for behavioral/emotional health. This placed residents at risk for increased behaviors and a decline in psychosocial well-being. Findings include: The facility's 8/2025 Behavioral Health Services Policy revealed residents who exhibited signs of emotional/psychological distress received services and support to address their individual needs and goals for care.Resident 47 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder. Resident 47's 10/11/25 hospital History and Physical Exam revealed Resident 47 had a diagnosis of suicidal ideations.Resident 47's 10/17/25 Social History Evaluation revealed Resident 47 stated she/he had a history of suicidal ideations.Resident 47's Care Plan dated 10/17/25 did not have interventions for suicidal ideations.On 12/1/25 at 9:51 AM Resident 4 stated she/he tried to commit suicide in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an account of all controlled drugs was maintained for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#2) reviewed for drug diversion. This placed residents at risk for drug diversion. Findings include:On 10/13/25 a FRI was received that indicated on 10/11/25 at 10:00 PM it was discovered that Resident 2 was missing methadone (narcotic medication). The facility investigation indicated on 10/12/25 two staff members counted narcotic medication at the end of their shift and found Resident 2 had 18 tablets of missing methadone. A staff member indicated she may have thrown away the medication. The facility was unable to locate the missing medicationThe 300 hall Controlled Substance Book number 29, page 108 revealed methadone had 18 tablets remaining on 10/11/25. There was no indication of the disposition of the remaining medication.On 12/4/25 at 8:24 AM Staff 12 (CMA) stated she worked a double shift on 10/11/25 and may have accidentally thrown the medication away. Staff 12 stated there were no discrepancies when counting with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    4. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 6/24/24 with diagnoses including urinary tract infection and diabetes. The 12/29/24 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 15 was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance with showering. On 1/9/25 at 1:08 PM Resident 15 stated her/his shower days were on Tuesdays and Fridays and was unsure if she/he missed any showers. Resident 15's December 2024 shower log revealed the resident received a shower on 12/13/24, refused a shower on 12/17/24, and received showers on 12/20/24 and on 12/27/24. Resident 15 went seven days between showers for two weeks. On 1/10/25 at 11:32 AM Staff 16 (CNA) stated Resident 15 did not receive a shower due to staffing shortage. Staff 16 stated Resident 15 was scheduled for a shower on 12/24/24, however, due to staffing shortage, no scheduled showers were completed on that day. On 1/10/25 at 12:16 PM Staff 2 (Regional RN) stated it was her expectation that all showers were completed as scheduled. If a shower was refused or missed, it would be completed at the next shift or next day. Staff 2 confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient nursing staff available to provide the necessary care and services to meet residents' needs in 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: On 7/25/24 the facility had a census of 62 residents. On 7/18/24, Staff 1 (Administrator) provided a list of residents who: -Required two-person mechanical lift transfers: 23; -Required one or two-person extensive or total assistance for bathing: 47; -Required one or two-person extensive or total assistance for toileting: 47; -Required one or two-person extensive or total assistance for dressing: 49; -Required two person assistance at all times for all care: 11; -Had behavioral healthcare needs which required monitoring: 28; -Were at risk for elopement: 5 and -Were considered high fall risks: 14 1. On 2/1/24 a public complaint was received by the State Agency which alleged the facility was short staffed CNAs on all shifts resulting in residents not being toileted timely, long…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activity program for 3 of 3 sampled dependent residents (#s 9, 24 and 47) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk of a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life. Findings include: The facility's 2/2005 Activities Policy revealed the facility was to encourage each resident to maintain normal leisure activity. The facility would provide an activities program that addressed the intellectual, social, spiritual, creative and physical needs, capabilities and interests of each resident. The activity program would promote each resident's self-respect by providing activities that supported self-expression and choice. 1. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in 5/2021 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and dementia. Resident 9's 6/11/21 and revised 11/16/21 Activities Care Plan indicated the following: -Resident 9 liked music, pet therapy, visiting with the chaplain, gardening, flowers and birds. -Resident 9 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure beverages were labeled and stored in a manner to minimize spoilage and bulk food items were stored in a manner to minimize cross contamination in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitary conditions. This placed residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings include: On 7/15/24 at 9:49 AM during the initial tour of the kitchen dry storage area, a plastic scoop was observed to be partially buried in the bulk sugar. Staff 24 acknowledged the scoop was not stored appropriately and stated it should be in the provided holster above the sugar rather than in the supply of sugar, to minimize the risk of cross contamination. On 7/15/24 at 9:57 AM the following items were observed to be stored in the snack refrigerator in the facility's 100 hallway: -A previously-opened liter container of nectar-thick lemon water dated 6/23 -A previously-opened liter container of nectar-thick lemon water dated 6/4 -A previously-opened liter container of nectar-thick orange juice labeled Use by 6/26 Staff 24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess a resident's cognition for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#47) reviewed for communication. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs. Findings include: Resident 47 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 47's 11/27/23 admission MDS, 2/27/24 Quarterly MDS and 5/29/24 Quarterly MDS Assessments indicated the resident's preferred language was Vietnamese, and the resident needed or wanted an interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care staff, was usually able to understand others and was usually able to make her/himself understood. Resident 47's 11/27/23 admission MDS, 2/27/24 Quarterly MDS and 5/29/24 Quarterly MDS Assessments indicated a BIMS interview was not attempted with the resident as the resident was rarely/never understood. No evidence was found in Resident 47's clinical record to indicate an interpreter was utilized to help assess the resident's cognition during the 11/27/23 admission MDS, 2/27/24 Quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a Level I PASARR (Preadmission Screening for Individuals with a Mental Disorder and Individuals with Intellectual Disability) was completed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#45) reviewed for PASARR. This placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement in a nursing facility and a lack of needed services. Findings include: Resident 45 was admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with diagnoses including stroke and schizophrenia (a mental disorder). A review of the resident's electronic health record revealed no evidence Resident 45 had a screening Level I PASARR completed prior to admission. On 7/17/24 at 11:13 AM Staff 11 (Medical Records) and Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed they were unable to locate a screening Level 1 PASARR for Resident 45.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to accurately reflect the needs of residents for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 45 and 48) reviewed for ADLs and falls. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 45 was admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with diagnoses including stroke and schizophrenia (a mental disorder). Resident 45's 6/14/24 Annual MDS indicated the resident required supervision or touch assistance for eating. Resident 45's current Care Plan indicated Resident 45 required one person assistance for eating. Observations from 7/15/24 through 7/18/24 between the hours of 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM revealed Resident 45 ate her/his meals without assistance. On 7/17/24 at 7:43 AM, 7:48 AM and 8:05 AM Staff 9 (CNA), Staff 10 (CNA) and Staff 16 (CNA) reported Resident 45 ate her/his meals without assistance. Staff 9 stated staff set-up Resident 45's tray and then the resident was independent with eating. On 7/19/24 at 8:43 AM Staff 3 (LPN-Care Manager) stated Resident 45 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services in the area of communication for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#47) reviewed for communication. This placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life and potential decline in their ability to carry out activities of daily living. Findings include: Resident 47 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 47's 11/27/23 admission MDS, 2/27/24 Quarterly MDS and 5/29/24 Quarterly MDS Assessments indicated the resident's preferred language was Vietnamese, and the resident needed or wanted an interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care staff, was usually able to understand others and was usually able to make her/himself understood. Resident 47's 4/11/24 Communication Care Plan indicated the following: -Arrange translator for Vietnamese as necessary to communicate with the resident. -Use the iPad (a small touchscreen computer) at the nurse's station to log in and indicate the language needed. Resident 47's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received required assistance with ADLs for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 19 and 28) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet ADL needs and loss of dignity. Findings include: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 1/2017 with diagnoses including respiratory failure with hypoxia (when the respiratory system can not provide adequate oxygen to the body) and major depressive disorder. Observations from 7/15/24 through 7/17/24 between the hours of 8:12 AM and 2:39 PM revealed Resident 19 had numerous hairs, approximately 1/2 inch long, on her/his upper lip and lower portion of her/his chin. Resident 19's 5/16/24 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required substantial to maximal assistance from staff for personal hygiene care which included shaving. On 7/16/24 At 2:39 PM Resident 19 indicated she/he did not like hair on her/his upper lip and chin and she/he wanted the hair removed. On 7/17/24 at 8:13 AM Staff 14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include: Resident 24 was admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including dementia A 12/7/23 Physician Order indicated Resident 24 was prescribed a lidocaine 4% pain patch to be applied to the resident's lower back, one patch once daily. The lidocaine 4% pain patch was to be on for 12 hours and off for 12 hours. A review of Resident 24's 7/1/24 through 7/31/24 MAR indicated the resident's lidocaine 4% pain patch was not administered according to the physician orders on the following days: -7/6/24, 7/8/24, 7/9/24 and 7/10/24. On 7/18/24 at 12:17 PM Staff 7 (CMA) stated there were no lidocaine 4% pain patches available in the facility on 7/10/24, so she was unable to provide Resident 24 with her/his lidocaine pain patch. On 7/18/24 at 12:27 PM Staff 8 (Maintenance Director) stated he was responsible for ordering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 25 admitted to the facility in 10/2022 with diagnoses including history of falls, and stroke with hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness of one side of the body). The quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed a BIMS score of 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact, and required minimal assistance from one staff for eating and oral/personal hygiene, maximal assistance from one to two staff for ADLs/cares, and she/he was dependent on one to two staff for wheelchair mobility and transfers. The resident's care plan, updated 4/6/23, revealed that she/he was at moderate risk for falls and needed a restorative care program to prevent decline in level of function. Interventions were updated on 6/6/24 to include a detailed ROM plan with monthly reviews. On 7/15/24 at 1:11PM Resident 25 demonstrated her/his ability to move arms effectively, and inability to move their legs effectively. Resident 25 stated they were supposed to receive restorative therapy three times a week, she/he received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the appropriate diet texture was followed for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for choking. Findings include: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 12/2016 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The facility's 9/2019 Food Size & Testing Methods Form defined a regular, easy to chew diet as the following: -No restrictions to food piece size. -Normal, everyday foods of soft and tender texture. -Foods must break apart easily and pass the fork pressure test. Resident 10's 5/2/24 Annual MDS revealed the resident experienced short-and-long-term memory loss, was moderately impaired for decision making, required supervision or touch assistance with eating and was edentulous (without teeth). Resident 10's 7/2024 Physician Orders directed the resident to receive a regular, easy to chew diet. On 7/15/24 at 11:53 AM Resident 10 was observed to eat in bed. The resident's meal tray sat on top of an overbed table and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement care plan interventions in the area of dining and nutrition for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs. Findings include: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 12/2016 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 10's 5/2/24 Annual MDS revealed the resident experienced short-and-long-term memory loss, was moderately impaired for decision making, required supervision or touching assistance with eating and was edentulous (without teeth). Resident 10's 5/16/24 Nutrition at Risk Care Plan indicated staff were to ensure the resident was in an upright position of 75 to 90 degrees during meals as the resident was considered at risk to aspirate. On 7/15/24 at 11:53 AM Resident 10 was observed to eat in bed. The resident's head-of-bed was elevated to approximately 45 degrees. On 7/17/24 at 8:07 PM Staff 10 (CNA) and at 8:27 PM Staff 19 (CNA) stated they were unsure of any positioning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide written information to residents concerning the right to formulate an advance directive for 5 of 5 sampled residents (#s 2, 7, 20, 23 and 50) reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: Records reviewed for Residents 2, 7, 20, 23 and 50 revealed no documentation of an advance directive or documentation to indicate the residents were informed of or provided written information concerning their right to formulate an advance directive. On 4/5/23 at 2:39 PM Staff 6 (Social Services Coordinator) stated she asked about a POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) upon admission but not advance directives. Staff 6 stated the facility had no process for discussing advance directives upon admission and was unable to provide documentation to verify residents were notified of their right to formulate an advance directive or to ensure a copy was obtained if a resident had an advance directive.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an RN was available for at least eight consecutive hours for 16 of 40 days reviewed for RN coverage. This placed residents at risk for delayed nursing assessments. Findings include: A review of the DCSDR (Direct Care Staff Daily Reports) revealed the following: In 7/2022 12 days were reviewed and revealed eight days without RN coverage on 7/20/22, 7/21/22, 7/25/22, 7/26/22, 7/27/22, 7/29/22, 7/30/22 and 7/31/22. In 8/2022 12 days were reviewed and revealed seven days without out RN coverage on 8/7/22, 8/12/22, 8/13/22, 8/14/22, 8/19/22, 8/20/22 and 8/21/22. In 10/2022 16 days were reviewed and revealed one day without RN coverage on 10/27/22. On 4/7/23 at 2:16 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged the lack of RN coverage for 7/2022, 8/2022 and 10/2022. Staff 1 stated they were working to ensure the facility had appropriate RN coverage.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 facility kitchen reviewed for sanitary food storage. This placed residents at risk for food-borne illness and contaminated food. Findings include: On 4/3/23 at 9:15 AM during the initial tour of the facility's walk-in refrigerator and dry storage room the following were observed: Walk-in refrigerator: -An open and undated bag of sliced cheese; -An open and undated container of chocolate pudding covered with plastic wrap; -An open and undated bottle of teriyaki sauce; and -An open and undated bottle of sesame dressing. Dry storage room: -An open and undated package of turkey powder gravy mix; -An open and undated package of chicken powder gravy mix; -An open and undated package of brown powder gravy mix; -An open and undated bag of spaghetti; and -Two open and undated bags of cereal. On 4/3/23 at 9:18 AM Staff 24 (Cook) confirmed the above items were not appropriately dated and stated it was policy for food items to be dated immediately after initial use. On 4/4/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's bathroom was clean and free of persistent odor for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#31) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for lack of a clean, homelike environment. Findings include: On 4/5/23 at 11:10 AM there was a strong odor of urine in Resident 31's bathroom. A pile of crumpled paper towels and a large puddle of liquid were observed on the floor near the toilet. On 4/5/23 at 11:19 AM Staff 23 (Housekeeper) was asked about the process for cleaning resident rooms. Staff 23 stated it was divided between shifts and every room including bathrooms and showers was cleaned daily. When asked about Resident 31's room Staff 23 indicated the resident frequently urinated on the floor and her/his room was a priority for cleaning. Resident rooms were not cleaned during meal times and he had not cleaned the resident room yet that day. He stated when he cleaned the resident's room he mopped the floor around the bed working his way to the bathroom. He stated the resident often tracked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident representative was able to file a grievance in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for grievances (#31). This placed residents at risk for unresolved concerns. Findings include: Resident 31 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder and vascular dementia. On 4/4/23 at 1:32 PM Witness 4 (Family) stated the facility sent a grievance form by email but she was not able to open the attachment. She wanted to follow up on concerns about a missing cell phone. According to a social services progress note dated 1/5/23 by Staff 6 (Social Service Coordinator) Witness 4 reported the missing cell phone and stated she wasn't able to video chat with the resident. The note indicated the facility would check on the lost items. A Social Services progress note by a different staff member dated 1/9/23 stated Witness 4 was told we have to file a grievance to get the phone replaced. A 4/6/2023 at 11:32 AM Social Services Note indicated a copy of a blank…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement or develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 5 sampled residents (# 16) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including stroke and thrombophilia (blood clots too easily). Resident 16's 10/17/22 CAAs indicated the resident had a history of recurrent strokes secondary to thrombophilia. Resident 16 had INR (blood test to determine dosing for anticoagulant medication) testing ordered and was followed by hematology (treatment of blood disorders) as an outpatient. Resident 16's 4/2023 physician's orders included warfarin (anticoagulant medication) once daily for thrombophilia. Resident 16's 4/2023 care plan did not include safety interventions and monitoring for bruising or bleeding related to anticoagulant use. On 4/10/23 at 9:46 AM Staff 16 (CNA) stated he would have to ask the nurse or medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise care plans in the areas of nutrition and ADLs for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#309) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 309 was admitted to the facility in 3/2023 with diagnoses including stroke and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). Resident 309's 3/15/23 Physician Orders revealed the resident received a pureed texture diet and was able to feed herself/himself with guidance and supervision for safety. Resident 309's 3/16/23 Care Plan revealed the following interventions: -Close supervision and some physical help with eating; -Alternate between solids and liquids; -Encourage the resident to remain in an upright position for at least 30 minutes after meals; -Ensure the resident completed swallowing without pocketing foods; and -Instruct the resident to chew slowly and not to talk while chewing or swallowing. Resident 309's 3/20/23 admission MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set-up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received equipment to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#32) reviewed for position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for worsening contractures. Findings include: Resident 32 was admitted to the facility in 8/2019 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. Resident 32's 3/9/23 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance from staff with dressing, personal hygiene and eating and had upper extremity impairment on one side. Resident 32's 3/7/23 Care Plan indicated the resident was to have bilateral inflatable cone shaped splints (called carrots) placed in both hands. The Care Plan indicated the carrot splints were okay to be removed when the resident participated with eating and dressing. Observations of the resident from 4/3/23 to 4/7/23 between 8:35 AM to 4:20 PM revealed the resident's right thumb was tucked in under the remaining four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to withhold a blood pressure medication according to physician ordered parameters for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#49) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for low blood pressure. Findings include: Resident 49 was admitted to the facility in 10/2022 with diagnoses including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow). Resident 49's 3/11/23 Physician Orders included metoprolol tartrate (treats high blood pressure, chest pain and heart failure) twice daily and to hold the medication if the resident's systolic (the upper number in a blood pressure reading) blood pressure was less than 100 or if the resident's heart rate was less than 70. Resident 49's 3/2023 and 4/2023 MARs revealed the metoprolol tartrate was administered on 3/12/23, 3/14/23, 3/18/23, 3/20/23, 3/21/23, 3/23/23, 3/26/23, 3/27/23, 3/29/23, 3/31/23, 4/1/23 and 4/4/23 when the resident's heart rate was less than 70. On 4/7/23 at 10:15 AM Staff 22 (CMA) reviewed Resident 49's 3/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#309) reviewed for medication administration. There were five errors in 29 opportunities resulting in a 17.24% error rate. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include: Resident 309 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including stroke. Resident 309's 3/15/23 physician's orders included: - crush medications in a teaspoon of puree (a smooth blended food) - aspirin chewable - multivitamin with minerals - atorvastatin (cholesterol lowering medication) - levetiracetam (used to treat seizures) - tamsulosin (urinary retention medication) Resident 309's March and April 2023 MARs and TARs did not include the physician's order for the resident's medications to be crushed. Resident 309's 3/16/23 Care Plan included an aspiration precaution intervention to crush medications in applesauce or pudding. On 4/6/23 at 9:25 AM Staff 22 (CMA) was observed to administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVAMERE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 5 of 53.8+1.2 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of EugeneEugene, OR 1 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of LebanonLebanon, OR 2 of 5Avamere At Pacific RidgeTacoma, WA 2 of 5Avamere Health Services Of Rogue ValleyMedford, OR 2 of 5Avamere Olympic Rehabilitation Of SequimSequim, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation At Park WestSeattle, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of IssaquahIssaquah, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Oregon CityOregon City, OR 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of ShorelineSeattle, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation of BurienBurien, WA 2 of 5Avamere Riverpark Of EugeneEugene, OR 2 of 5Avamere Transitional Care At SunnysideSalem, OR 3 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of HillsboroHillsboro, OR 4 of 5Avamere Court At KeizerKeizer, OR 4 of 5Avamere Crestview Of PortlandPortland, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation At RidgemontPort Orchard, WA 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of ClackamasGladstone, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Junction CityJunction City, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of NewportNewport, OR 4 of 5Avamere Transitional Care Of Puget SoundTacoma, WA 4 of 5Richmond Beach RehabShoreline, WA 4 of 5The PEARL AT KRUSE WAYLake Oswego, OR 5 of 5Avamere At Three FountainsMedford, OR 5 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Cascade ParkVancouver, WA 5 of 5Queen Anne HealthcareSeattle, WA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ARISO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/06/2006
ARI OPERATIONS, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/06/2006
AVAMERE GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/06/2006
MILLER, KARLIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/30/2000
MIDCAP FINCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/22/2010
ADAMS, NANCYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
CAVALLO, GLENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
FEAKIN, CODYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FUNDERBERG, MICHELLEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
HILL, KEVINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/12/2022
HOSKINS, TONIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2025
INSKEEP, TODDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/21/2022
KOFSTAD, MARYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/13/2024
MUNRO, JOLYNNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
OKOLI, IKEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
POLSON, JUSTINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/10/2025
POWELSON, MICHELEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2015
REID, MISTYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2025
SANDERS, AMANDAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
SIMPSON, ANDREWIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
STRUNK, COLBYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
VANDERZANDEN, CARRIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
AVAMERE HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2005
AVAMERE SKILLED ADVISORS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2005
DANA, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2022
DOEPKER, ANDREAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/28/2023
FREEMAN, SHANNONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2025
GILES, HEATHERANNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
GOETTEL, TASHINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
LARSON, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2020
PRESLEY, YOLANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
DAVIS, JULIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
GAMES, KIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
HEREFORD, BRETTIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/16/2020
STAPLES, CAROLYNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/05/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 69 rows in the source record cover these 35 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 4%Other / private 26%

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$531per resident / day
operating cost
$16,142per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$534per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385132. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next