No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avamere Rehabilitation At Ridgemont

2051 Pottery Avenue, Port Orchard, WA 98366 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 96 certified beds · (360) 876-4461 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (360) 876-4461 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609) — most recent Apr 2026Resident-funds citation (F0567)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
450 S Kitsap Blvd · (360) 744-6250 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1400 Pottery Ave · (360) 895-5505 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
500 South St · (360) 895-5178 · Call to confirm hours
Park
350 Tremont St · (605) 243-2311 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2308 Sidney Ave · (360) 876-2374

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.9%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.0%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms63.8%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%2.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.5%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.1%12.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.6%22.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.5%15.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.6%19.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.2%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.651.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.481.521.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 297 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.5%CMS range 58.9–69.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 7.0–12.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.0%CMS range 2.9–7.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.39
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.02
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
43.0%
Total nursing turnover
38.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 77.9 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-12)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain clarification for treatment and assess timely for prompt intervention, a surgical incision under the dressing for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for wound care. Resident 1 experienced harm when their surgical incision dehisced (opened back up), became necrotic (dead/devitalized tissue) and showed signs of infection after 19 days without observation of the incision below the dressing assessment. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, heart and kidney disease. The Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated [DATE], showed the resident required assistance with their activities of daily living. Resident 1's progress note, dated [DATE], showed Resident 1 was scheduled for a L [left] toe amputation (surgical procedure to remove a body part) on [DATE] related to necrosis and several unsuccessful…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure results of allegations/investigations were reported to the State Agency Hotline within 5 working days for 2 of 2 residents (1 & 2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed residents at risk for potential unmet needs and decreased quality of life. Findings included .Resident 1Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure and diabetes mellitus. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for some activities of daily living (ADLs).Incident Report, dated 03/16/2026, documented Staff D, Nursing Assistant (NA), stood at the end of Resident 1's bed and told them to stop stuttering. Then, slammed Resident 1's refrigerator door so hard the freezer opened. The allegation was reported to the State Agency on 03/16/2026. No evidence was provided showing a 5-day follow-up was submitted to the State Agency.On 04/13/2026 at 1:57…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications (drugs that affect behavior, mood, thoughts and perception) had an adequate indication for use, the specific target behaviors (TB) the medication was implemented to treat were identified and monitored, gradual dose reductions (GDRs) were performed and resident responses accurately assessed and documented, non-drug interventions were identified and attempted prior to administration of as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications, and staff monitoring for medication adverse side effects occurred for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 13, 44 & 26) reviewed for unnecessary medications. These failures detracted from staff's ability to assess the effectiveness of psychotropic medication(s), need for ongoing use and presence of medication adverse side effects (ASEs). This placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications, unidentified or delayed identification of ASEs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . 1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a transfer notice and written bed hold notice at the time of transfer to the hospital, for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 24, 73 & 2) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed residents at risk for not knowing their rights to transfers or of bed holds while in the hospital and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .RESIDENT 24Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 09/05/2025, documented Resident 24 was cognitively intact.Resident 24 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. The electronic health record (EHR) had no documentation Resident 24 was provided with a transfer notice or a bed hold notice at the time of the transfer. RESIDENT 73Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on 07/082025. The admission MDS, dated [DATE], documented Resident 73 was cognitively intact.Resident 73 was transferred to the hospital on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide bowel care in accordance with physician orders and the facility bowel protocol for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 6 & 36) reviewed for bowel management, to replace tube feeding syringes every 24 hours as ordered for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 79) reviewed for tube feeding, and to ensure non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs, non-medication interventions aimed to decrease pain) were attempted prior to administration of as needed (PRN) pain medication for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 44 & 26) reviewed for unnecessary medications. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, possible complications, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's Living Bowel Care Protocol policy, dated October 2020, showed if a resident did not have a bowel movement (BM) for three days (must be a medium or large BM) the following would occur.a) The evening shift nurse would administer Milk of Magnesia (MOM).b)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and dated in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice, and expired medications were discarded for 1 of 2 medication rooms and 1 of 2 medication carts (300 Hall medication room and medication cart) that were observed. These failures placed residents at risk to receive expired medications and negative health outcomes.Findings included . 300 Hall Medication CartObservation of the 300-hall medication cart on 09/10/2025 at 2:40 PM with Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), revealed the following expired and/or undated medications:1) Resident 37's glargine insulin pen (prefilled injection device containing a long-acting type of insulin used to manage blood sugar level) was opened and undated. Review of the pharmacy quick reference guide showed glargine insulin pens were to be discarded 28 days after opening.2) Resident 62's atropine eye drops had an open date of 08/22/2024. Review of the package insert showed the eye drops were to be discarded 180 days after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the staff failed to maintain infection control practice by transporting linen covered and performing hand hygiene when delivering clothes from room to room in 4 of 4 hallways (100, 200, 300 and Transitional Care (TC)) observed. These failures placed all residents at risk of an infection and diminished health.Findings included.On 09/07/2025 at 12:44 PM, Staff J, Laundry Aide, was observed delivering personal clothes down the 100 hallway from a rolling basket style cart with a stack of clothes layered onto each other inside the cart. The cart contained personals and was uncovered. Staff J was observed delivering resident clothes to room [ROOM NUMBER] and then 105. Staff J, touched the hangers in room [ROOM NUMBER] and took them out of the room and hung them on the cart. Staff J did not perform hand hygiene before going into room [ROOM NUMBER] where Staff J brought out empty hangers. Staff J was not observed performing hand hygiene before going into room [ROOM NUMBER] where they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling catheters (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra to drain urine) were assessed for catheter removal and coordination with urology occurred timely for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for urinary catheters. These failures placed residents at risk for unnecessary catheterization, urinary tract infections, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke and kidney disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 04/11/2025, showed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, dependent for activities of daily living and had indwelling urinary catheter. On 04/10/2025 at 2:12 PM, Collateral Contact 1 (CC 1), said they had expressed ongoing concerns about Resident 1's catheter. CC1 said the urine in the catheter bag was frequently red in color and there was sludge (mixture of solid and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment on 1 of 4 hallways (200 hall). The failure to ensure hallway carpeting was clean and in good repair and resident rooms were mopped and free of sticky substances, placed resident at risk for a diminished quality of life, and resulted in a less than homelike environment. Findings included . On 08/21/2024 at 10:28 AM, observation of the 200-hall carpet showed an approximately 30-foot-long vertical cut right down the middle of the hallway carpet, and multiple five to eight feet long, horizontal cuts in the carpet running side to side across the hallway. Each of the vertical and horizontal cuts were covered with duct tape. At 10:30 AM, when asked about the state of the carpet, an anonymous staff member stated, oh you noticed that [carpet in disrepair]. I can't stand it. The staff member indicated the carpet had been in that state for a few years. On 08/22/2024 at 11:55 AM, when asked about the environment, Resident 65 stated, [The hallway carpet] is disgusting. I find it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident 63) reviewed for communication and sensory and who required assistive devices for vision or hearing were assisted with application of their glasses. Failure to ensure their glasses were in good repair and applied to the resident daily precluded the resident from reading the activity calendar and menus independently and placed them at risk for feelings of diminished self worth and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the 07/09/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), showed the resident's vision was adequate with the use of corrective lenses. A self care deficit care plan, revised 08/24/2023, showed the resident wore glasses during waking hours, as well as at night as the resident would often wake up and read. Staff were directed to keep the resident's glasses within reach for independent use, and make sure the glasses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain residents' highest practicable level of well-being for 5 of 8 residents (Residents 65, 32, 25, 10 and 13) reviewed for bowel management. The failure to initiate bowel care in accordance with physician's orders placed residents at risk for pain/discomfort, nausea, decreased appetite and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Avamere Living Bowel Care Protocol, dated 10/2020, showed if a resident had not had a bowel movement (BM) for three consecutive days (must be medium or large), Evening shift would administer: a) milk of magnesia (MOM) b) if no results from MOM, day shift would administer a bisacodyl suppository. c) if no results from the suppository, a fleets enema would be administered. If no results from the enema a focused examination of the abdomen and a digital exam and notify the physician. 1) Resident 65 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 08/22/2024 at 12:02…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-27 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure intravenous (IV) access devices were assessed, maintained and monitored in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 16, 48 & 74) reviewed for IV therapy. The failure to ensure IV orders included routine monitoring of IV insertion sites, flush orders, weekly changes of IV dressings and needleless injection caps, and initial and then weekly measurements of IV catheters external length and the residents arm circumferences, placed them at risk for loss of vascular access, infection, and other potential negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Vascular Access Device (VAD) Dressing Change, Needleless Connector Change, Flushing and Locking, and Peripheral Midline Catheter policies, dated 08/2021, showed VADs included PICCs, non-tunneled catheters (subclavian, jugular, femoral), Tunneled catheters, and implanted venous ports. Staff were directed to:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-27 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assure residents received foods in the appropriate form and/or nutritive content as prescribed by a physician for 5 of 36 sampled residents (Resident 57, 22, 10, 52 & 74) reviewed for diet requirements. Failure to ensure residents' received physician ordered therapeutic diets or portion sizes placed residents at risk for medical complications or nutritional deficits. Findings included . Review of the breakout menu for the lunch meal on 08/26/2024 showed residents on a: a) Regular diet was to receive an #8 scoop of apple crisp. b) Residents on a soft bite sized diet (SB6) or minced and moist diet (MM5) were to receive a #12 scoop of apple crisp. c) Residents on a pureed diet (PU4) were to receive a #10 scoop of apple crisp. d) Residents on limited carbohydrate, limited fat, limited salt, or limited potassium/phosphorus diets, were to receive a #16 scoop of apple crisp. Additionally, residents on a low potassium/phosphorus (renal) diets were to receive lemonade in lieu of milk and spiral pasta in lieu of cubed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with personal funds/resident trust accounts had ready access to their accounts during evenings and weekends for 11 of 11 residents reviewed for person funds accounts. This failure placed residents at risk of not having access to their accounts during non-banking hours, a decreased sense of autonomy and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . On 08/21/2024 at 1:02 PM, Resident 3 said they had a family member open another bank account for them because they could not withdraw money from their personal funds account on the weekends. On 8/26/2024 at 9:37 AM, Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), said she did not know the process if a resident wanted to withdraw money from their personal funds account over the weekend or after hours. At 9:40 AM, Staff C, LPN Resident Care Manager, said she did not know how a resident could withdraw funds from their Personal Funds account on the weekends and she said she would contact the business office to find out. At 9:50 AM, Staff I, Receptionist, said residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents a written notice detailing the reasons for discharge/transfer and to provide a copy of the notice to the state Ombudsman office as required for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 27 & 75) reviewed for hospitalizations. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate transfers and a lack of information regarding their rights and options related to bed-holds. Findings included . Facility policy, titled, Transfer or Discharge Notice, dated March 2021, documented Residents and/or representatives are notified in writing, and in a language and format they understand, at least thirty (30) days prior to a transfer or discharge. A copy of the notice is sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman at the same time the notice of transfer or discharge is provided to the resident and representative. Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimal Data Set, (MDS, an assessment tool) date 07/23/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Care Conferences (a conference where staff and residents/families talk about life in the facility, review the progress of resident and make adjustments, as needed, to their care), for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 13) reviewed for provision of care conferences, and failed to ensure care plans were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected resident care needs for 4 of 21 sample residents (Residents 16, 48, 63, & 8) reviewed for care plan timing and revision. These failures placed residents at risk of not feeling involved in the development of their plan of care, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Care Plans> 1) Resident 48 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 07/22/2024, showed the resident had intravenous (IV) access via a midline and received IV medications. A 07/27/2024 re-admission nurse's note documented the resident had a midline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to include providing oral care and assistance with shaving for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 63 and 10) reviewed for ADL's. The failure to assist dependent residents with oral care and shaving, placed residents at risk for embarrassment, dental caries, powerlessness and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 63 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the 05/09/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), showed the resident was dependent on staff for oral hygiene and had no obvious or likely cavities or broken natural teeth. An ADL self-care care plan, initiated 05/20/2024, showed staff were directed to set Resident 63 up to self-brush, and staff were to assist to complete. On 08/21/2024 at 1:52 PM, Resident 63's family member said the resident was always clean shaven prior to admitting to the facility and systematically cleaned his hands…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure non-invasive mechanical ventilation via continuous positive airway pressure machines (CPAP, an external device that provides a fixed pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep) was provided in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 25 & 63) reviewed for respiratory care. The failure to ensure active CPAP orders were in place and complete, to include the prescribed pressure settings, type of mask (e.g. nasal pillows, nasal mask, full face mask) to be used, direction to check and refill the humidifier reservoir, and the solution to be used to refill it, placed residents at risk for ineffective assisted ventilation and unmet respiratory needs. Findings included . 1) Resident 25 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the 01/17/2024 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), showed the resident was cognitively intact, had diagnoses of chronic lung disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medication administration consistent with professional standards of nursing practice for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 1 and 2) reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, diminished quality of life and potential for medical complications. Findings included . <RESIDENT 1> Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated, 11/01/2023, showed Resident 1 was cognitively intact. On 01/11/2024, at 1:02 PM, Resident 1 said they had not received their melatonin (medication to help with sleep) when Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), worked. Resident 1's physician's orders showed the resident had an order, dated 11/01/2023, for one melatonin per day for sleep. Review of a facility investigation, dated 12/15/2023, showed Resident 1 made an allegation against Staff A, LPN. The results of the investigation showed the facility removed Staff A from caring for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was maintained to keep the facility free of phorid flies (a type of fly that breed in moist, decaying organic matter) in 3 of 4 resident care units (Hallway 100, 200 and 300), kitchen, dining room and common areas of the facility. This failure placed residents at risk for infection, distress and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENTS> On 11/08/2023 at 12:48 PM, Resident 1 said they were used to the flies and observed them frequently at mealtime or when food was present. Resident 1 said the flies would not land on their food because the resident would constantly move their fork to keep the flies from landing. The resident said if they stopped moving the fork the flies would land on the food. At 3:26 PM, Resident 2 said there were flies all over the place that landed on their face and food. The resident said there was nothing they could do except swat them away. At 3:55 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 51 Review of Resident 51's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a required assessment tool) dated 03/12/2021, showed Resident 51 admitted on [DATE] with multiple health conditions including stroke and muscle weakness. The MDS further showed that the resident required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). Review of Resident 51's care plan dated 07/05/2023 showed that the resident required assistance with ADLs related to decreased mobility and weakness. The resident's goal was to participate in active assistive range of motion (AAROM) program to bilateral lower extremities (BLE) to prevent tone or contractures. In addition, staff were to implement these interventions one to two times per week. Multiple observations on 09/18/2023 at 9:35 AM, 09/18/2023 at 2:15 PM, and 9/19/2023 at 11:11 AM, showed Resident 51 was either in bed sleeping or watching television. Review of a document titled, RA Program Flowsheet dated 03/2023 to 07/2023, showed that Resident 51 was to have a restorative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident refrigerators to ensure temperatures were withing safe ranges for 2 of 4 refrigerators (room [ROOM NUMBER] and 203) when reviewed for Kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk of consuming expired food items, foodborne illness, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's Refrigerator Temperature Log form, which was attached to all resident refrigerators, showed, The temperature needs to be checked and documented by the housekeeping staff & report to maintenance personnel if temperature is under 35 degrees or over 40 degrees via the maintenance log. Review of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s Refrigerator Temperature Log form for September 2023 on 09/21/2023 showed two days without entries and 16 days with the recorded temperature greater than 40 degrees (total of 20 entries). Review of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s Refrigerator Temperature Log form for September 2023 on 09/21/2023 showed two days without entries and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor resident food preferences for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 61) reviewed for Choices. This failure placed the resident at risk of reduced nutritional intake, undesired weight loss, a lack of enjoyment in eating, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . During an interview on 09/18/2023 at 12:47 PM, Collateral Contact FF, anonymous (CC), stated that Resident 61 preferred to eat ground meat, but that the facility would only provide cut meat. CC FF further stated that Resident 61 could not chew cut meat and would spit the meat out. Observation on 09/19/2023 at 1:22 PM showed Resident 61 with their meal tray on the overbed table. Observation of the meal tray showed a piece of meat, uncut, and other food items. Observation showed that Resident 61 consumed less than 10% of the meal. Observation on 09/20/2023 at 12:25 PM showed Resident 61 with their meal tray on the overbed table. Observation of the meal tray showed a piece of meat, uncut, and other food items. Review of Resident 61's physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician for one of four residents (Resident (R) 30) reviewed for medication errors who missed seizure medications. This failure placed residents at risk for health complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings include . Review of the facility's policy titled Guidelines for Notifying Physicians of Clinical Problems dated 09/17 documented: These guidelines are intended to help ensure that medical care problems are communicated to the medical staff in a timely, efficient, and effective manner .Immediate Notification (Acute) Problems : The following symptoms, signs .should prompt immediate notification of the physician after an appropriate nursing evaluation .Thee situations include .seizure activity, medication error . Review of R30's Face sheet found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Admission tab revealed R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of epilepsy. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan to include catheter use based on physician orders for one of two residents (Resident (R) 175) reviewed for catheter care. Failure to ensure an initial care plan addressed catheter care placed residents at potential risk for unmet needs, medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan - Baseline, dated 12/16, revealed A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. To assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within forty-eight (48) hours of the resident's admission .The Interdisciplinary Team will review the healthcare practitioner's orders (e.g., dietary needs, medications, routine treatments, etc.) and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs .The baseline care plan will be used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of 25 residents (Residents 276) whose care plans were reviewed. Failure to establish care plans that accurately reflected assessed care needs, resident desired outcomes/goals, and provide direction to staff (interventions) related to activities placed residents at risk to receive less than adequate care. Findings included . Multiple observations throughout the day on 09/19/2023 and 09/20/2023 showed Resident 276 self-propelled in their wheelchair to the sidewalk adjacent to the facility to smoke a cigarette. Upon returning to the building the resident put their lighter and cigarettes in a small purse which was hanging on the wheelchair and returned to their room. Review of Resident 276's Electronic Health Record showed progress notes on 04/17/2023 that indicated the resident advised the Director or Nursing that they had no intention to stop smoking. On 05/26/2023 Resident 276 was observed smoking and reminded by staff of the non-smoking policy. On 07/12/2023 at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of R176's Clinical Census, located in the EMR under the Census tab, revealed an admission date of 09/07/23 with medical diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction and paraplegia. Review of R176's admission MDS located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an ARD of 09/12/23 revealed a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, indicating R176 was cognitively intact. The MDS revealed R176 required extensive physical assistance of two+ persons for bed mobility and transfers. During an observation and interview on 09/18/23 at 10:51 AM, R176 was observed in her room in bed. R176 stated she was admitted after a stroke. R176 stated she had been paralyzed 30 years, incomplete quad cervical fracture. I could use my left arm, but the stroke took that away. During an interview with R176 and her Collateral Contact (DD), on 09/19/23 at 8:50 AM, DD stated R176 got another skin tear last night because they transferred her on the Hoyer (mechanical lift) with only one person. DD stated, it's on her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Multiple observations throughout the day on 09/19/2023 and 09/20/2023 showed Resident 276 self-propelled in their wheelchair to the sidewalk adjacent to the facility to smoke a cigarette. Upon returning to the building the resident put their lighter and cigarettes in a small purse which was hanging on the wheelchair and returned to their room. Review of Resident 276's Electronic Health Record showed progress notes on 04/17/2023 that indicated the resident advised the Director or Nursing that they had no intention to stop smoking. On 05/26/2023 Resident 276 was observed smoking and reminded by staff of the non-smoking policy. On 07/12/2023 at the quarterly care conference Resident 276 was reminded about the non-smoking policy and informed that they would have to sign the non-smoking agreement. Review of Resident 276's Comprehensive Care Plan on 09/19/2023 showed no documentation or interventions related to smoking. Review of Resident 276's Electronic Health Record on 09/19/2023 showed no smoking assessment had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a therapeutic diet as ordered for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 61) when reviewed for Nutrition. This failure placed residents at risk for difficulty eating, possible choking hazard, reduced nutritional intake, unintended weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . During an interview on 09/18/2023 at 12:47 PM, Collateral Contact FF, anonymous, stated that the facility cut Resident 61's meat into pieces. Review of Resident 61's 12/22/2022 initiated care plan showed a focus area related to diet and included an intervention of soft and bite-sized meats. Observation on 09/19/2023 at 1:22 PM showed Resident 61 with their meal tray on the overbed table. Observation of the meal tray showed a piece of meat, uncut, and other food items. Observation showed that Resident 61 consumed less than 10% of the meal. Observation on 09/20/2023 at 12:25 PM showed Resident 61 with their meal tray on the overbed table. Observation of the meal tray showed a piece of meat, uncut, and other food items.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Residents 275) reviewed for respiratory care. Failure to ensure there was a Physician's order for oxygen placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Resident 275 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the 09/01/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) the resident had no chronic respiratory diagnoses but required supplemental oxygen during the assessment period. Observations on 09/18/2023 at 10:49 AM and 09/19/2022 at 12:45 PM showed Resident 275 was receiving oxygen (O2) at seven liters per minute (7L/min) via nasal cannula (NC). Review of Resident 275's Electronic Health Record showed no physician order for oxygen. Review of Resident 275's Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed no area for documentation of the oxygen administration.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility failed to maintain sufficient staffing levels to provide exercise programs to maintain/prevent range of motion for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 9, 51, and 276) when reviewed for Sufficient Nurse Staffing. Failure to maintain staffing to provide these services placed residents at risk of deconditioning, loss of range of motion, inability to complete activities of daily living (ADL), and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . During an interview on 09/20/2023 at 9:54 AM, Staff C, Assistant Director of Nursing/Restorative Coordinator (ADON/RC), stated that the facility was having trouble consistently providing exercise programs. Staff C stated that the facility had previously had two aids responsible for providing exercise programs, but that these staff were re-assigned to other duties. Staff C further stated that a physical therapist aid had then instituted a group exercise program, but that this staff was promoted and could not continue this function. Staff C stated that the only exercise program provided by the facility was a group exercise…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for two of four residents (Residents (R)30 and R59) reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to administer Clobazam (used to treat seizure disorder) between 08/18/23 and 08/24/23 with R30 experiencing a seizure on 08/24/23 and failed to administer Clobazam according to physician order for R59. This failure placed residents at risk for health complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled [Company Name]-Medication Error Guidelines, dated 02/21, revealed If a medication error is identified at any time, the Licensed Nurse discovering the error will notify the Physician and the Director of Nursing Service (DNS). Review of the facility policy titled Seizures and Epilepsy-Clinical Protocol, dated 11/18, revealed If a new or recurrent seizure is identified or suspected, the physician will evaluate the need to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to detect and discard unopened, expired medications from one of two medication storage rooms reviewed. These failures placed residents at potential risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medications with unknown potency Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications dated 11/20 documented .Outdated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed . During an observation of the facility's medication room on the 300 unit with Registered Nurse (Staff S) on 09/21/23 between 11:14 AM and 11:23 AM, the following expired medications were observed: -Two enema saline laxatives with expiration dates May 2001 and February 2003. -Biotene dry mouth spray with expiration date 01/23/23. -One bottle of magnesium citrate liquid 10-ounces with expiration date December 2022. -One container of vitamin B6 100 milligram (mg) with expiration date August 2023. -One container of meclizine 25 mg with expiration date May 2003. -One container of Coenzyme Q-10 30 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure enteral nutrition (delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube [a device that delivers liquid nutrition] directly into the stomach or small intestine) was administered in accordance with physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for enteral nutrition. This failure placed the resident at risk for inadequate nutrition, dehydration, hunger, and potential adverse outcomes. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 07/04/2023, showed the resident received their nutrition through a feeding tube. Review of Resident 1's physician orders, dated 01/19/2023, showed orders for 220 milliliters (ml) of Glucerna 1.2 formula, via enteral feeding, every four hours. Review of Resident 1's progress notes, dated 08/08/2023 at 6:37 AM, showed that the nurse observed an incorrect setting on the enteral feeding pump (the equipment that administers the formula over a set period)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVAMERE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.6+1.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 54.0-2.0 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of EugeneEugene, OR 1 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of LebanonLebanon, OR 2 of 5Avamere At Pacific RidgeTacoma, WA 2 of 5Avamere Health Services Of Rogue ValleyMedford, OR 2 of 5Avamere Olympic Rehabilitation Of SequimSequim, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation At Park WestSeattle, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of IssaquahIssaquah, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Oregon CityOregon City, OR 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of ShorelineSeattle, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation of BurienBurien, WA 2 of 5Avamere Riverpark Of EugeneEugene, OR 2 of 5Avamere Transitional Care At SunnysideSalem, OR 3 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of HillsboroHillsboro, OR 4 of 5Avamere Court At KeizerKeizer, OR 4 of 5Avamere Crestview Of PortlandPortland, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of ClackamasGladstone, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Junction CityJunction City, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of King CityTigard, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of NewportNewport, OR 4 of 5Avamere Transitional Care Of Puget SoundTacoma, WA 4 of 5Richmond Beach RehabShoreline, WA 4 of 5The PEARL AT KRUSE WAYLake Oswego, OR 5 of 5Avamere At Three FountainsMedford, OR 5 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Cascade ParkVancouver, WA 5 of 5Queen Anne HealthcareSeattle, WA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NAIR SNF OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/22/2023
NAIR FACILITY HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/22/2023
NAIR LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/22/2023
NAIR OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/22/2023
DILLON, RICHARDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/22/2023
ODERMOTT, RONALDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/22/2023
KRETCHMAR, JOSHUAIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/01/2023
CARLSTON, SCOTTIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/06/2024
KOFSTAD, MARYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/13/2024
SIMPSON, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$482K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 22%Other / private 15%

This home reported $482K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$397per resident / day
operating cost
$12,054per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$440per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505217. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next