No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avamere Rehabilitation Of Oregon City

1400 Division Street, Oregon City, OR 97045 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 111 certified beds · (503) 656-0367 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (503) 656-0367 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Feb 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)2 actual-harm citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$85,768 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Feb 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $85,768 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-13)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
Rite Aid1.0 mi
1900 Mcloughlin Blvd · (503) 656-1020 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
13927 Holcomb Blvd · (503) 656-4022 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1612 Jackson St · (971) 204-4602 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.2%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.6%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.6%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%2.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.0%20.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.1%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.7%5.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.4%21.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.7%13.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.9%81.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.6%21.4%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.8%16.1%12.0%typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.48U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.1%CMS range 51.2–74.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.2–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.671.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.26
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
52.6%
Total nursing turnover
70.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 61.5 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.48 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-06)
31
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent a fall with injury for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for falls. As a result, Resident 8 sustained a fractured arm. Findings include:Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 5/2025, with diagnoses including neck fracture.Resident 8's 5/27/25 Care Plan revealed the resident had limited mobility due to her/his neck fracture and required a two-person transfer assist for toileting. Resident 8's 5/31/25 MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact and had a BIMS of 15 out of 15.A 6/25/25 Facility Investigation Report (FRI) revealed Resident 8 fell and sustained a fracture of her/his right arm after Staff 20 (CNA) attempted to transfer Resident 8 from the commode by herself. The facility determined Staff 20 had not followed Resident 8's care plan, which indicated the resident was a two-person transfer assist for toileting.A 6/27/25 Hospital Discharge Summary revealed that Resident 8 sustained a right arm fracture as a result of her/his fall at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2024-02-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide the necessary care to prevent pressure ulcers, and accurately assess and provide timely treatment and repositioning to promote healing of pressure ulcers for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 2 and 46) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident 2 developed a preventable Stage 3 pressure ulcer. Findings include: CMS Appendix PP defined a Stage 3 pressure ulcer as: Full-thickness skin loss. Full-thickness loss of skin, in which subcutaneous fat may be visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epibole (rolled wound edges) are often present. Slough (dead cells that accumulate in the wound) and/or eschar (a dry, dark scab or falling away of dead skin) may be visible but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. The depth of tissue damage varies by anatomical location; areas of significant adiposity can develop deep wounds. Undermining and tunneling may occur. Fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage and/or bone are not exposed. If…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician's orders for a timely post-operative follow-up appointment for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#98) reviewed for quality of care. This delay resulted in Resident 98 being sent from the physician's clinic, directly to the hospital for surgery. Findings include: Resident 98 was admitted to the facility in 11/22/22 with diagnoses including amputation and diabetes. Resident 98's hospital Skilled/Intermediate Nursing Facility Transfer Orders dated 11/22/22 included: - Operations/Major Procedures: right partial first ray (toe) amputation. - No changes to the right foot dressing until podiatry follow-up. - Schedule an appointment as soon as possible for a visit in one week. Please make the appointment with [the resident's surgeon] at [a specific office location]. A Transportation Request Checklist dated 11/23/22 indicated Resident 98 had a podiatry appointment scheduled for 12/7/22 [with a different provider and location than what was ordered]. A Progress Note dated 12/7/22 at 10:07 AM indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure biologicals were stored securely for 1 of 3 sampled medication carts reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for unauthorized access to drugs and biologicals. Findings include: The facility's 11/2020 Storage of Medications Policy specified the following: -Drugs and biologicals are stored in the packaging in which they are recieved. -Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments. The facility's 11/2020 Administering Medications Policy specified the following: - The individual adminstering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right route of adminstration before giving the medication. A review of Resident 13, 14, 18, 31, 32 and 38's 5/2025 MARs revealed the following: - Resident 13 received atorvastatin (lowered cholesterol levels), gabapentin (reduced nerve pain), and sertraline (anti-depressant). -Resident 14 received simvastatin (lowered cholesterol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for being uninformed about their medications. Findings include: Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in 11/2024 with diagnoses including depression. Resident 14's 12/2024 Physician Orders indicated the resident was prescribed use of duloxetine and Wellbutrin (antidepressant medication) for depression. Resident 14's 5/2025 MAR revealed the resident received duloxetine and Wellbutrin daily. Review of Resident 14's medical record revealed no indication the resident was informed in advance of the risks and benefits of the duloxetine or Wellbutrin. On 6/6/25 at 9:58 AM, Staff 2 (Director of Nursing) acknowledged Resident 14 was not informed of the risks and benefits of the use of duloxetine or Wellbutrin.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#15) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for lessened quality of life. Findings include: Resident 15 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including asthma and congestive heart failure. The 5/18/24 Care Plan indicated Resident 15 had asthma and interventions to minimize contact with known offending allergens. Staff were to assist in identifying asthma triggers and strategies for prevention. On 6/2/25 at 11:14 AM the wall behind Resident 15's bed was observed to have a large section of missing sheet rock scattered across the wall. A significant amount of sheet rock pieces and sheet rock dust was observed scattered across the base board ledge and on the floor. Resident 15 stated the debris was caused by the bed hitting the wall and it had not been fixed. On 6/4/25 at 8:46 AM Staff 11 (CNA) stated damage to Resident 15's wall was due to the bed sliding into the wall. Staff 11 stated the wall had been in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of mental abuse for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 7/2024 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Resident 2's 2/16/25 Quarterly MDS indicated a BIMS score of 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. On 6/2/25 at 12:10 PM Resident 2 stated she/he witnessed staff on several occasions mock and make fun of her delusions. Resident 2 stated she/he reported the incidents to someone in April, but nothing was done. Resident 2 stated the mocking and laughing took a mental toll on her/him, made her/him angry and made her/him not want to report the delusions anymore. On 6/5/25 at 12:52 PM Staff 6 (Social Services Director) and Staff 7 (Social Services Coordinator) stated Resident 2 reported the floor staff were making fun and laughing at her/him. Staff 6 stated Resident 2 did not want to file a grievance because…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a PASARR Level II (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability/developmental disability) was completed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#30) reviewed for PASARR Level II. This placed residents at risk for not receiving specialized services. Findings include: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. A 6/24/24 PASARR Mental Health Evaluation was completed for Resident 30 which recommended a PASARR Level II be completed for a serious mental illness (SMI) and intellectual disability (ID)/Developmental Disability (DD). A 6/27/24 hospital discharge summary record indicated that Resident 30 had probable developmental delay. No evidence was found in Resident 30's medical record to indicate a PASARR Level II for ID/DD was completed. On 6/5/25 at 2:47 PM Staff 6 (Social Services Director) and Staff 5 (Social Services Coordinator) were present…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure hearing aids fit properly and worked for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#45) reviewed for communication. This placed residents at risk for decreased quality of life. Findings include: Resident 45 was admitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder. Resident 45's 1/31/25 admission MDS indicated Resident 45 could hear adequately with the assistance of aids or other hearing appliance. A 1/28/25 progress note indicated resident 45's hearing aid did not work. A 3/4/25 progress note indicated Resident 45 needed a new hearing aid as it was broken. On 6/3/25 at 8:58 AM, the State Surveyor interviewed Resident 45 and had to speak loudly, clearly, and close to Resident 45's face in order to be heard. On 6/3/25 at 8:58 AM, Resident 45 stated she/he was hard of hearing and could not hear well unless she/he wore hearing aids. Resident 45 stated she/he had hearing aids, but they no longer worked. Resident 45 stated she/he told Staff 15 (CMA) & Staff 20 (RN) her/his hearing aids…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to offer restorative services to increase range of motion for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#4) reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative. This placed resident at risk for decrease in range of motion. Findings include: The facility's Restorative Policy, dated 11/11/05, indicated the following: -It is the policy of this facility to provide its residents the restorative services in an effort to maintain the resident's highest level of self-care and independence, physically and psychosocially. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including pleural effusion (a excessive fluid build up in between the lungs and chest wall). Review of Resident 4's PT Discharge Summary on 2/28/25 indicated Resident 4 was seen for PT from 1/7/25 to 2/28/25. A 4/11/25 Care Conference Note indicated Resident 4 expressed interest to continue physical therapy and/or restorative services. A 4/17/25 Progress Note indicated Resident 4 would be a good fit for a restorative program to regain strength. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff followed transmission-based precautions for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#260) reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for exposure and contraction of infectious diseases. Findings include: Resident 260 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including clostridioides difficile (c-diff, a bacterium that can cause severe diarrhea and inflammation of the colon). Resident 260 on transmission-based precautions - enteric precautions at time of admission. An undated Avamere Contact Enteric Precautions facility procedure: -Everyone Must: Clean hands with sanitizer when entering room. Wash with soap and water upon leaving room. -Gown and glove before entering the room after hand hygiene has been completed. -Doctors and Staff Must: use resident dedicated or disposable equipment. -Clean and disinfect shared equipment between residents and before removing it from the resident's room. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed properly orientate and sufficiently prepare a resident for a facility-initiated discharged for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for safe discharge. This placed residents at risk for unsafe, facility-initiated discharges. Findings include: Resident 11 admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including depression, anxiety, alcohol abuse and cannabis dependence. A 11/5/24 Social Service Note stated a list of assisted living facilities was provided to Resident 11 via email and indicated the resident should follow up to inquire if a facility had a vacancy. A 11/7/24 Progress Note stated Resident 11 left the faciity on [DATE] and did not return until dinner time on 11/6/24; over 24 hours out of the facility. Resident 11 was discharged AMA (against medical advice). There was no documented evidence the facility provided Resident 11 sufficient preparation and orientation for her/his discharge. On 1/13/25 at 10:17 AM, Staff 3 (RNCM)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for diabetic medication management. This placed residents at risk for complications from diabetes. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 1/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes, unspecified fracture of the right femur (largest leg bone) and dementia. No observations were made of Resident 2. Resident 2 was discharged . Resident 2's 1/17/24 Care Plan revealed the resident had impaired swallowing with risk for aspiration and was on a one to one assist with all meals. Resident 2's 1/19/24 MDS revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 2's 1/29/24 physician orders revealed the resident was on two different insulin for her/his diabetes. The insulin order for Humalog (lispro) read: -Humalog 100unit/ml (lispro). Give 6 units SQ (subcutaneous, under the skin) with meals. -Humalog 100 unit/ml (lispro). Inject as per sliding scale (before meals and at bedtime): If capillary blood glucose (CBG) test…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 48 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide palatable food for 4 of 5 sampled residents (#s 3, 9, 12 and 13) reviewed for dietary services. This placed residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with diagnoses including unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition and Vitamin D deficiency. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in 11/2024 with diagnoses including malnutrition and hepatic encephalopathy (a loss of brain function when a damaged liver doesn't remove toxins from the blood). Resident 12 was admitted to the facility 5/2024 with diagnoses including hypertension and chronic kidney disease. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility 1/2025 with diagnoses including diabetes and Vitamin D deficiency. On 1/9/24 at 12:20 PM, a test tray was delivered to two members of the survey team. The lunch tray consisted of chicken fried steak, mashed potatoes with gravy and cooked spinach. The lunch meal was not palatable. The chicken fried steak was tough and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility's quality assessment and assurance committee (QAA) failed to implement and oversee appropriate plans of action to correct identified deficiencies related to: investigation of abuse, sufficient staffing, inaccurate daily staff postings, medication error rate and reference checks. This placed residents at risk for lack of quality of life and quality of care. Findings include: 1. A review of four residents for investigation of abuse revealed two were not thoroughly investigated. -This deficiency was also cited on the 1/13/23 recertification survey. 2. A review of 12 of 14 sampled residents (#s 2, 8, 10, 15, 19, 23, 26, 28, 33, 34, 42, 46, 157 and 259) and 3 of 3 halls reviewed for call light wait times and staffing revealed sufficient nursing staff was not provided to attain or maintain residents highest practicable level of well-being. -This deficiency was cited on the 1/13/23 recertification survey. 3. A review of the daily staff posting information revealed inaccurate daily staff postings. -This deficiency was also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 4 of 5 sampled resident (#s 26, 34, 52 and 259) reviewed medications. This placed residents at risk for side effects and of lack medication efficacy. Findings include: 1. Resident 34 was admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with diagnoses including chronic heart failure and strain of the right quadriceps muscle and tendon. The 1/4/24 Annual MDS revealed Resident 34 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A physician's order dated 1/25/24 directed staff to administer hydroxyzine (an anti-anxiety) every four hours for anxiety. Administration times were 12:00 AM, 4:00 AM, 8:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 4:00 PM and 8:00 PM. A review of the 1/2024 MAR and the Medication Audit Report revealed the following: -1/27/24 8:00 AM dose was given at 11:13 AM (over three hours late). -1/27/24 12:00 PM was marked as given in the MAR however the Medication Audit Report did not show the medication was administered on 1/27/24 at 12:00 PM. -1/28/24 8:00 AM dose was given at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure residents attained or maintained their highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being for 12 of 14 sampled residents (#s 2, 8, 15, 19, 23, 26, 28, 33, 34, 42, 46, and 157) and 3 of 3 halls reviewed for call light wait times and staffing. This placed residents at risk for delayed care. Findings include: 1.On 2/5/24 the facility provided lists of residents who: -Required assistance with eating: 10 -Required two-person assistance with transfers: 9 -Required a mechanical lift for transfers: 22 -Required assistance with dressing: 45 -Required assistance with bathing: 39 -Required assistance with toileting: 33 -Residents who were incontinent: 33 -Had wandering behaviors: 1 -Had behavioral healthcare needs: 2 Interviews with residents revealed the following concerns: On 2/5/24 at 9:05 AM Resident 2 indicated call light response wait times were a concern and were ongoing as far back as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-13 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNAs received annual performance reviews for 4 of 5 randomly selected CNA staff (#s 19, 21, 22 and 23) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lessened quality of care. Findings include: Performance reviews were requested on 2/12/24 for Staff 19 (CNA), Staff 21 (CNA), Staff 22 (CNA), and Staff 23 (CNA). Staff 1 (Administrator) was unable to produce the documentation. On 2/13/24 at 1:15 PM Staff 1 acknowledged Staff 19, Staff 21, Staff 22, and Staff 23 annual performance reviews were not completed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Direct Care Daily Staff Reports (DCSDR) were accurate for 79 of 188 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents and the public at risk for lack of knowledge of accurate staffing. Finding include: A review of the DCSDR from 7/1/23 through 7/31/23, 8/1/23 through 8/31/23, 9/1/23 through 9/30/23, 10/1/23 through 10/31/23, 11/1/23 through 11/30/23 and 1/1/24 through 2/4/24 revealed 79 instances where the actual number of RNs working was not recorded accurately. On 2/9/24 at 2:02 PM Staff 38 (Staffing Coordinator) and Staff 39 (Business Office Manager and Human Resources) indicated they did not realize they were to include all RNs on the DCSDR. On 2/13/24 at 1:15 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed the DCSDR did not reflect the actual count of RNs working and those available to staff.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-13 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 3 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 21, 22, and 23) reviewed for in-service training. This placed residents at risk for lack of competent staff. Findings include: A review of the facility's staff training records revealed the following: - Staff 21 (CNA) received 6.5 hours of annual training. - Staff 22 (CNA) received 7.0 hours of annual training. - Staff 23 (CNA) received 3.0 hours of annual training. On 2/13/24 at 1:15 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed Staff 21, Staff 22 and Staff 23 lacked the required 12 hours of in-service training.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess a resident's ability to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#33) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects. Findings include: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including respiratory failure. On 2/7/24 at 12:35 PM Resident 33 was observed to have a bottle of lidocaine (anesthetic) lotion on her/his bedside table. Resident 33 stated she/he applied the lotion to her/his rashes to help reduce her/his pain. A review of Resident 33's medical record did not reveal a self-administration of medication assessment was completed. On 2/8/24 at 12:38 PM Staff 4 (LPN-RCM) acknowledged Resident 33 had lidocaine lotion in her/his room and a self-administration of medications assessment was not completed for the resident.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received written information in a manner they understand for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#24) and failed to follow-up regarding advance directives for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 15 and 42) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for not having their health wishes honored. Findings include: 1. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnosis including cancer. A 6/24/23 admission MDS indicated Resident 24 was Spanish speaking with limited English. A 12/6/23 Care Conference Progress note indicated Resident 24 was able to answer simple questions, but was unable to understand more complex ideas. On 2/12/24 at 11:35 AM, with the assistance of an interpreter, Resident 24 stated she/he was not aware of an advance directive being offered. On 2/12/24 at 2:42 PM Staff 7 (Social Service Director) stated Resident 24 was not given paperwork to formulate an advance directive in Spanish, a manner which she/he could understand. 2. Resident 15 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain adequate room temperatures for 1 of 1 resident (#156) reviewed comfortable environments. This placed residents at risk for uncomfortable environments. Findings include: Resident 156 was admitted to the facility in 2/2024 with diagnoses including back fracture. Resident 156's 2/4/23 BIMS assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact. On 2/6/24 at 3:52 PM Resident 156 was in her/his room in bed with a shawl wrapped around her/his body talking with Staff 47 (PT). Resident 156 stated her/his room was freezing and she/he was always cold. Resident 156 stated she/he reported her/his concerns regarding the temperature of her/his room to multiple staff since the day she/he admitted to the facility, but her/his concern was not addressed. On 2/7/24 at 12:24 PM Resident 156 was in her/his room sitting in her/his wheelchair wearing a sweater. Resident 156 stated her/his room was freezing since she/he admitted to the facility, and one night she/he asked for four blankets to keep warm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident drug records including narcotics were accurate for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#259) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate clinical records related to narcotics and drug diversion. Findings include: Resident 259 was admitted to the facility on 1/2024 with diagnoses including lumbar radiculopathy (inflammation of a nerve root in the lower back). A 1/25/24 admission MDS indicated Resident 259 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. On 2/7/24 at 3:04 PM Resident 259 stated Staff 20 (LPN) brought in the resident's gabapentin (nerve pain medication) and oxycodone (pain medication) at approximately 6:00 AM on 2/5/24. Resident 259 stated she/he refused the oxycodone because she/he did not need it at that time. Staff 20 stated he would destroy the oxycodone. Resident 259 stated she/he requested an oxycodone from Staff 42 (CMA) around 10:00 AM on 2/5/24 and asked if her/his oxycodone was destroyed from 6:00 AM. Staff 42 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse and injury of unknown origin to the State Survey Agency for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 42 and 46) reviewed for abuse and accidents. This placed residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings include: 1. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including leg fracture. A Grievance document dated 10/20/23 revealed Resident 42 reported to Staff 44 (CNA) a male CNA was rough with her/him during care and she/he told the CNA to stop. Staff 44 indicated this was reported to Staff 45 (LPN). A Progress Note dated 12/8/23 indicated Resident 42 was heard screaming in her/his room. Staff 25 (LPN) entered the resident's room and saw two CNAs providing ADL care. Resident 42 was screaming for staff to stop but they continued. On 2/5/24 at 2:42 PM Resident 42 stated she/he experienced two episodes of care from CNA staff where she/he felt abused. The first episode two CNAs came into her/his room and were rough with her/him during cares, she/he yelled for staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse and injury of unknown origin for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 42 and 46) reviewed for abuse and accidents. This placed residents at risk for abuse and injuries. Findings include: 1. Resident 46 was admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease. Resident 46's 10/31/23 admission MDS indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, had no upper or lower extremity impairment and required partial/moderate assistance when going from sitting to standing and with bed-to-chair transfers. Resident 46's 11/2023 ADL Task Form revealed the following: -From 11/1/23 through 11/23/23 the resident was noted to be independent to requiring substantial/maximal assistance when going from sitting to standing. On 11/24/23 and 11/25/23 the resident was dependent on staff to go from the sitting to standing position. -From 11/1/23 through 11/24/23 the resident was noted to be independent to requiring substantial/maximal assistance with bed-to-chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide ongoing assessments of a skin condition for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#33) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for worsening skin conditions. Findings include: Resident 33 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of heart failure. An 10/17/23 admission Data Base Evaluation indicated Resident 33 had open skin and redness under bilateral breasts and in the creases of the groin. A review of the resident's clinical record did not indicate any skin assessments or physician's order for wound treatment. On 2/5/24 at 10:25 AM Resident 33 stated she/he had open red areas under her/his breast and groin area. Resident 33 stated she/he used her/his own lidocaine powder because the areas were painful. On 2/8/24 at 12:16 PM Staff 4 (LPN-RCM) acknowledged Resident 33's skin assessment was completed on the admission Data Evaluation but no further skin assessments of the open red areas or physician's order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a significant change of condition assessment was completed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#46) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident 46 was admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease. Resident 46's 10/31/23 admission MDS indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, occasionally incontinent of bladder and bowel and had no pressure ulcers. The MDS also indicated the resident required partial/moderate assistance with showers, upper and lower body dressing, personal hygiene and transfers and required substantial/maximal assistance with toilet hygiene. A 11/27/23 Progress Note revealed Resident 46 fractured her/his right femur and she/he was transferred to the hospital. Resident 46 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of the right femur and a Stage 3 pressure ulcer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately code MDS assessments for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 2 and 33) reviewed for dental and pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments. Findings include: 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis and depression. An 10/14/23 Skin Incident Report revealed Resident 2 had a history of multiple old wounds to her/his buttocks region, and the skin was fragile. Staff 34 (LPN) was called into the room and determined the resident had some scant bleeding from a wound with two rounded mountain peak shapes that joined together in an oval pattern. The wound was approximately 4.0 cm x 1.5 cm, and the wound site exhibited full-thickness skin loss to the right gluteal area due to bowel incontinence, friction, and shearing. On 10/16/23 Staff 5 (RN-MDS Coordinator) inspected the wound and the wound appeared to be full-thickness skin loss caused by bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 17, and 33) reviewed for dialysis and dental. This placed residents at risk for lack of ADL care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease and received dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products from the blood when the kidneys stop working). Resident 17's Psychotropic Drug Use CAA dated 12/11/23 indicated Resident 17 had a long term use of Wellbutrin (used to treat depression) and hydroxyzine (used to treat anxiety). A review of Resident 17's clinical record revealed no comprehensive care plan was completed related to the resident's use of Wellbutrin and hydroxyzine. On 2/12/24 at 2:14 PM Staff 3 (RNCM) acknowledged Resident 17's comprehensive care plan did not include any information regarding the use of Wellbutrin and hydroxyzine 2. Resident 33 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise care plans and conduct person-centered care conferences for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 15 and 42) reviewed for care planning and care conferences. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 15 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including pressure ulcer and weakness. On 2/5/24 at 4:07 PM Resident 15 stated she/he had a care conference when she/he first admitted to the facility in 10/2023 but did not have another care conference. A 12/7/23 Comprehensive Plan of Care Review Included Staff 8 (Social Services Coordinator), Staff 4 (LPN-RCM) and Staff 11 (Activities Director). There was no mention Resident 15 or department managers were in attendance. On 2/13/24 at 10:47 AM Staff 2 (DNS) and Staff 12 (Regional RN) stated all care conferences should include the Resident or Resident Representative and the following department managers: Resident Care Manager, Dietary,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined facility staff failed to meet professional standards for medication administration for 2 of 2 unsampled residents (#s 13 and 37) and 1 of 1 sampled resident (#17) observed during medication administration. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication reactions. Findings include: 1. Resident 13 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnosis including diabetes. A 12/6/23 physician order indicated Resident 13 received Humalog (fast acting) insulin before meals. On 2/7/24 at 5:16 PM a student nurse supervised by Staff 25 (LPN) administered insulin to Resident 13. Resident 13 did not receive her/his evening meal until 6:41 PM. Staff 25 and the student nurse acknowledged the resident should have food within five to 15 minutes after administration of insulin and the meal was not provided to the resident within the appropriate timeframe. On 2/8/24 at 10:49 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated she expected nurses to administer fast-acting insulin with a meal. 2. Resident 17 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide showers to maintain appropriate hygiene for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 8 and 34) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of showers and grooming. Findings include: 1. Resident 34 admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with diagnoses including chronic heart failure and strain of the right quadriceps muscle and tendon. A care plan dated 12/24/23 revealed Resident 34 required one to two person maximum assistance with bathing and to encourage independence with upper body hygiene. The 1/4/24 Annual MDS, revealed Resident 34 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the Shower CNA Document Report Survey from 12/2023 through 2/2024 revealed the following: -Resident 34's showers were scheduled every Monday and Thursday evenings. 12/2023: Resident 34 had eight opportunities for showers. -12/4/23, 12/7/23, 12/11/23, 12/14/23, 12/8/23 and 12/21/23, but they were blank or had an x. -12/25/23 and 12/28/23 were marked with the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure treatment and services to maintain vision abilities were provided for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for vision. This placed residents at risk for impaired vision. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including chronic heart failure and hypertension. A Grievance Communication Form dated 12/29/23, revealed Resident 1 was upset because she/he was not scheduled for an eye appointment. On 1/4/24 Staff 7 (Social Service Director) contacted the clinic and learned Resident 1 asked to schedule her/his own eye appointments. Staff 7 spoke with Resident 1 about the call with the clinic and Resident 1 stated she/he would alert Staff 7 if she/he needed any assistance. A Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident 1 had a BIMS score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Random observations from 2/5/24 through 2/7/24 revealed the resident wore…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate foot care for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#19 and 34) reviewed for foot care. This placed residents at risk for lack of nail care, pain, and increased infections. Findings include: 1. Resident 34 admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with diagnoses including chronic heart failure and strain of the right quadriceps muscle and tendon. The 1/4/24 Annual MDS revealed Resident 34 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A Progress Note dated 1/8/24 revealed Staff 25 (LPN) delivered Resident 34's medications and the patient asked Staff 25 to trim her/his nails. Staff 25 filed her/his nails and the resident complained Staff 25 did not cut or file them short enough. Staff 25 explained her/his nails were too thick to be cut and she/he needed a podiatry appointment. On 2/5/24 at 3:50 PM Resident 34 stated her/his toenails were long and thick and she/he wanted her/his nails trimmed. Resident 34 stated her/his concern to staff but no one made a podiatry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a restorative program to prevent further decline in range of motion as ordered for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#3) reviewed for ROM. This placed residents at risk for decline in their range of motion abilities. Findings include: Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 2013 with diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis. On 2/5/24 at 10:18 AM Resident 3's was observed with her/his right upper extremity tightly held against her/his body. Resident 3 stated the facility did not do any ROM to her/his arms or leg and it upset her/him. On 2/7/24 at 9:19 AM Staff 19 (CNA Restorative Aide) stated Resident 3 was previously on restorative services but no longer received restorative services and CNAs were responsible to provide ROM for Resident 3. Staff 19 stated CNAs were expected to complete ROM for Resident 3 which included upper and lower extremities and was implemented several months ago. On 2/7/24 at 9:32 AM Staff 22 (CNA) stated ROM was completed by Staff 19, not by the CNAs. Staff 22 stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff followed the care plan related to fall safety for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#46) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injury. Findings include: Resident 46 was readmitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses including fracture of the right femur. Resident 46's 1/11/24 Falls Care Plan indicated the resident was to have fall mats to the bilateral sides of her/his bed. Resident 46's 1/31/24 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required substantial/maximal assistance from staff with transfers and experienced two or more falls since her/his prior assessment. Observations of Resident 46 on 2/6/24 at 3:40 PM, 2/7/24 at 3:15 PM and 2/8/24 at 3:10 PM revealed the resident to be in her/his room in bed. No fall mat was observed on the floor on the resident's left side. On 2/9/24 at 11:23 AM Staff 25 (LPN) stated Resident 46 was considered at risk to fall. Staff 25 further stated the resident required a fall mat when she/he was in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders related to oxygen and BiPAP (breathing support through a face mask) administration for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#33) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for difficulty breathing. Findings include: Resident 33 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including heart failure and respiratory failure. The 10/2023 TAR revealed the resident required continuous oxygen at two liters when not using her/his BiPAP machine. -The 1/2024 TAR indicated the resident was to have a humidifier connected to her/his oxygen concentrator and indicated Resident 33 was to wear her/his BiPAP machine while sleeping with four liters of oxygen connected to the machine. Random observations from 2/5/24 through 2/8/24 on day and evening shifts revealed Resident 33 not wearing oxygen continuously and there was no humidifier connected to the oxygen concentrator. On 2/8/24 at 12:38 PM Resident 33 stated staff did not place her/his oxygen on when her/his BiPAP machine was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate and timely pain management for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#156) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at risk for experiencing pain. Findings include: Resident 156 admitted to the facility in 2/2024 with diagnoses including back fracture and restless leg syndrome (a condition that causes discomfort in the legs and a strong urge to move the legs, especially at night and when sitting or lying down, and can disrupt sleep). Resident 156's 2/4/24 BIMS revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 156's 2/4/24 Vitals and Pain Only Evaluation revealed the resident experienced constant pain over the last five days in her/his lower back. The resident rated her/his pain as moderate (five out of 10 on a pain scale). Resident 156's SNF/ICF admission Orders directed the resident to receive the following: -acetaminophen, take two tablets every six hours; -ropinirole (used to treat symptoms of restless less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication with the dialysis center for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#17) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for dialysis complications. Findings include: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease and was dependent on dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products from the blood when the kidneys stop working). Resident 17's care plan for renal failure dialysis, created on 12/2/24, indicated the resident's scheduled dialysis days were Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. A dialysis communication form was reviewed and indicated the facility was to complete the section for Resident 17s last recorded weight, current blood pressure, any concerns, and the nursing staff signature and date. The dialysis center was to complete the section for pre and post dialysis weights, labs performed, treatment provided (medication given), problems, date, and signature. The facility staff was to complete blood pressure, pulse, respirations,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were 3 errors in 26 opportunities resulting in an 11.54% error rate. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: A 2/1/24 Mayo Clinic Insulin Administration document included: -Inject Humalog rapid acting insulin within five to 10 minutes before or after a meal -Inject NPH intermediate acting insulin 30 to 45 minutes before a meal 1. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnosis including diabetes. A 12/6/23 physician order indicated Resident 13 to receive Humalog (fast acting) insulin before meals. On 2/7/24 at 5:16 PM a student nurse supervised by Staff 25 (LPN) administered insulin to Resident 13. Resident 13 did not receive her/his evening meal until 6:41 PM. Staff 25 and the student nurse acknowledged a meal was not provided to the resident within the appropriate timeframe. On 2/8/24 at 10:49 AM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged nurses should give fast-acting insulin with a meal.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide timely dental services to meet resident needs for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#33) reviewed for dental. This placed residents at increased risk for decline in oral health. Findings include: Resident 33 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnosis including heart failure. On 2/5/24 at 10:32 AM Resident 33 stated she/he recently spoke with a nurse regarding her/his missing and loose teeth which bothered her/him, she/he wanted a dental appointment, but did not receive any response to the request. Resident 33's 10/17/23 admission Data Base indicated Resident 33 had no missing teeth. Resident 33's 10/21/23 admission MDS indicated the resident had all natural teeth without impairments. A 10/30/23 SLP evaluation indicated Resident 33 had missing left and right molars and a loose molar. On 2/8/24 at 12:06 PM Staff 4 (LPN-RCM) indicated when a resident or staff member notified her an appointment was needed for a resident she notified Social Services. On 2/8/24 at 2:41 PM Staff 7 (Social Service Director)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received adaptive utensils for 1 of 7 sampled resident (#16) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and weight loss. Findings include: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2013 with diagnoses including dementia. On 2/7/24 at 11:48 AM Resident 16 was observed in the assisted dining room with regular utensils. Resident 16's meal ticket indicated adaptive built-up silverware for all meals. On 2/7/24 at 11:50 AM Staff 19 (CNA Restorative Aide) stated the kitchen always forgot Resident 16's adaptive utensils and staff had to ask the kitchen for the adaptive utensils. On 2/7/24 at 1:20 PM Staff 10 (Dietary Manager) acknowledged the kitchen staff often forgot to place the adaptive utensils on the tray, but the facility was changing the meal ticket form which would make it easier for the kitchen staff to see/read the adaptive utensils on the meal tickets.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide physical and occupational therapy services as ordered for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 8 and 49) reviewed for rehabilitation services. This placed residents at risk for a decline in functional abilities and diminished quality of life. Findings include: The facility's 11/2005 Rehab Services Policy revealed a therapist will provide therapy upon written order of the resident's attending physician. 1. Resident 8 admitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses including stroke. Resident 8's 12/1/23 admission Orders directed the resident to receive skilled physical and occupational therapy. Resident 8's 12/6/23 Physician Orders revealed physical and occupational therapy to be provided as indicated. Resident 8's 12/10/23 admission MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact, had lower extremity impairment and required substantial to maximal assistance with most transfers. The MDS indicated the resident did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to attain and maintain the highest practicable wellbeing for 3 of 3 halls (100, 200 and 300 halls) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely assistance for ADL care needs. Findings include: 1. On 1/8/23 at 1:03 PM Resident 298 stated she/he was new to the facility and staff were not timely with assisting her/him in bed when using her/his call light. Resident 298 stated she/he was scared because no one helped her/him timely. On 1/8/23 at 1:46 PM Resident 26 stated call lights were a concern and the wait time was from 15 minutes up to an hour to receive help to use the bathroom. Resident 26 stated one CNA was always on their phone and not attending to her/his ADL care needs. Resident 26 further started she/he did not always get her/his pain medications timely. On 1/8/23 at 2:12 PM Resident 3 stated she/he was dependent on staff for cares and there was not enough staff in the building to answer call lights timely. Resident 3 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-13 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient support personnel to effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. This placed residents at risk for delayed meals and cold food. Findings include: On 1/10/23 at 11:06 AM a sign on the kitchen door was observed stating Please hold all resident requests/needs/wants etc. until after tray service times. As soon as we are finished with tray service, we will reopen window to assist you. Times on the door for tray service indicated: Breakfast 8 AM, Lunch 12 PM, Dinner 5:15 PM. On 1/10/23 at 11:08 AM Staff 13 (Dietary Aide) stated she just started working in the kitchen 1/3/23 and there was one cook to serve meals for about 45 residents. Staff 13 was observed to be the only kitchen personnel. Staff 13 stated the cook was supposed to come in at 11 AM and the dietary manager had just left. On 1/10/23 at 11:57 AM Staff 12 (Cook) stated he just started his shift and not everything for lunch was prepped so he had to complete that prior to serving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper flavor, food textures and food temperatures were maintained for food trays served from 1 of 1 facility kitchens reviewed for food service. This placed residents at risk for food that was not palatable, safe or appetizing. Findings include: 1. Resident 4 admitted to the facility in 10/2013 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a progressive disease which damages the sheaths of nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord). On 1/9/23 at 1:05 PM Resident 4's lunch arrived which had popcorn shrimp on her/his plate and Resident 4 indicated the popcorn shrimp was cold and she/he did not like it. On 1/9/23 at 1:08 PM Staff 18 (CNA) stated Resident 4's meals were often cold and she/he would request an alternative meal because the meal was either cold or Resident 4 did not like the taste of what she/he originally ordered. On 1/10/23 at 12:46 PM Resident 4 was observed in bed and she/he was brought her/his meal which included enchiladas, rice and beans. Staff 31 (CNA) removed the lid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was clean, food was stored and labeled according to appropriate food handling guidelines, and all kitchen staff wore hairnets while working in for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. This placed residents at risk for cross-contamination and foodborne illness. Findings include: 1. On 1/8/22 at 10:44 AM initial kitchen tour observations revealed: *Two unopened containers of buttermilk with a use by date of 12/28/22. *A bag of opened pie crust dated 1/3 with the bag open to air. *Wilted lettuce in a bag open and undated in the fridge. *Coleslaw in an opened bag that was soggy on the bottom and undated in the fridge. *A new bag of freezer burned broccoli. *An opened container of undated and partially eaten pie in the freezer. On 1/8/23 at 10:52 AM Staff 12 (Cook) acknowledged the unlabeled and undated food items and stated the freezer-burned veggies came to them two days ago in that condition. Staff 12 agreed the food items were expected to be discarded. On 1/12/23 at 9:29 AM Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility's quality assessment and assurance committee (QAA) failed to implement and oversee appropriate plans of action to correct identified deficiencies related to: To bowel care, sufficient staffing, food procurement, sufficient staffing and CNA staffing ratios. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. A review of five residents for bowel care revealed one was not provided appropriate bowel care. This deficiency was also cited on the 1/11/22 recertification survey. 2. A review of 3 of 3 Halls (100, 200 and 300 Hall) revealed sufficient nursing staff was not provided to attain or maintain residents highest practicable level of well-being. A review of minimum CNA staffing requirements were did not meet the minimum CNA ratios. This deficiency was cited on the 1/11/22 recertification survey. 3. A review of the daily staff posting information revealed inaccurate daily staff postings. This deficiency was also cited on the 1/11/22 recertification survey. 4. A review of one of one kitchen revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident council requests or grievances were followed up on for 1 of 1 Resident Council reviewed for grievances. This placed residents at risk for unaddressed needs. Findings include: On 1/9/23 at 12:00 PM resident council Notes were requested for any grievances or concerns regarding residents' care needs from 10/2022 through 12/2022. On 1/10/23 at 1:43 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated there were no resident council notes located for 10/2022 or 11/2022 which would address concerns regarding resident care needs. Staff 1 stated 12/2022 the resident council meeting was canceled due to a COVID-19 outbreak. Staff 1 stated the only resident council notes located were from 8/2022 and 9/2022. On 1/10/23 at 1:57 PM Resident 24 (Resident Council President) stated they had monthly meetings and concerns were reviewed and discussed at the resident council meetings. Resident 24 indicated conversations had been on-going regarding insufficient staffing, ADL care needs and dietary concerns. Resident 24 further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program designed to meet the individual interests and needs of residents for 4 of 5 sampled residents (#s 4, 13, 16, and 25) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for diminished physical, emotional and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: 1. Resident 4 admitted to the facility in 10/2013 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a progressive disease which damages the sheaths of nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord). A care plan revised on 10/29/13 revealed the following: - Staff were to invite Resident 4 to activities; preferred in room activities such as manicures, crossword puzzles, word searches and TV programs. - Resident 4 enjoyed playing bingo. - One-to-ones with staff, visitors and family. On 1/8/23 at 12:39 PM Resident 4 stated she/he preferred to stay in her/his room and never got out of bed. Resident 4 stated the facility had bingo but no other activities and she/he was not provided an activities calendar. Resident 1 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a qualified professional to direct the activities program for the facility. This placed residents at risk for unmet physical, mental and psychosocial needs. Findings include: On 1/10/23 at 10:39 AM Staff 5 (Activity Coordinator) stated she had been in the activities position since 8/2022 and was still figuring out what her responsibilities were. Staff 5 stated she had no official training, did not have an activities certificate but had assisted with activities in the past. On 1/12/23 at 1:13 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated Staff 5 had prior experience working in activities but did not have an activities certificate.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the daily staff posting was accurate for 18 out of 31 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents, public and staff at risk for lack of accurate staffing information. Findings include: On 1/8/23 at 11:36 AM the Direct Care Staff Daily Report was observed and had 1/6/23 through 1/7/23 attached behind the 1/8/23 form. The forms were missing census, staff type and hours worked. On 1/8/23 at 3:30 PM the Direct Care Staff Daily reports were provided from 12/8/22 through 1/7/23 revealed 18 instances when portions of the form were left blank or were inaccurate. The incomplete or inaccurate information included census, number of staff working and number of hours worked. On 1/12/23 at 10:29 AM Staff 4 (HR/Payroll/Staffing Coordinator) acknowledged the Direct Care Staff Daily Report forms were inaccurate regarding staff, staff hours worked and census. Staff 4 stated the Direct Care Staff Daily Report form was to be completed by the nurse coming onto the next shift and the nurses were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a policy that identified staff responsible for monitoring the use and storage of food in resident personal refrigerators for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 1, 3, 4 and 12). This placed residents at risk for cross-contamination and foodborne illness. Findings include: A review of the December 2016 Facility Personal Food Storage Policy indicated personal room refrigeration units would be monitored by designated facility staff for food safety, perishable foods would be dated, and all units were to have internal thermometers to monitor safe food storage temperature. The policy did not indicate the staff designated. On 1/9/23 at 11:49 AM pre-packed Jell-O cups with an expiration date of 10/18/21 and pre-packaged mandarin oranges with an expiration of 12/20/21 were observed on the floor below a small personal refrigerator in Resident 12's room. Resident 12 stated she/he could not reach the refrigerator independently. Inside the refrigerator were four Jell-O cups which had an 10/18/21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident received a recliner chair for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#26) reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: Resident 26 admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including a pubic bone fracture. The 11/28/22 admission MDS indicated Resident 26 was cognitively intact and required extensive staff assistance with transfers. The 1/5/23 Physical Therapy Note indicated Resident 26 was still requesting a lift recliner to be installed in the room. On 1/8/23 at 1:50 PM Resident 26 stated she/he requested a recliner for easier transfers to the commode but had not received one. Resident 26 stated she/he spoke with Staff 10 (Physical Therapist) and the facility had an extra recliner but needed permission to put it in Resident 26's room. There was no recliner observed in Resident 26's room. On 1/9/23 at 12:16 PM Staff 10 stated she asked administrative staff to get Resident 26 a recliner for two weeks as the resident needed to be able to transfer from a recliner in order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to assist a resident with transportation to a medical appointment for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#98) reviewed for medical transportation. This placed residents at risk of not attending scheduled medical appointments. Findings include: Resident 98 was admitted to the facility in 11/22/22 with diagnoses including amputation and diabetes. Resident 98's hospital Skilled/Intermediate Nursing Facility Transfer Orders dated 11/22/22 included: - Schedule an appointment as soon as possible for a visit in one week. Please make the appointment with [the resident's surgeon] at [a specific office location]. A Transportation Request Checklist dated 11/23/22 indicated Resident 98 had a podiatry appointment scheduled for 12/7/22 with a different provider and location than what was ordered. The checklist also incorrectly indicated the resident was not diabetic and also indicated the resident required a wheelchair van for transportation but would be transported by Witness 3 (Family). A Progress Note dated 12/7/22 at 10:07 AM indicated Resident 98…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to update the care plan for feeding assistance for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#25) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs and aspiration. Findings include: Resident 25 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. The 11/30/22 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 25 was rarely/never understood and required extensive assistance with eating. The 11/2/21 Care Plan indicated the Resident 25 was at risk for aspiration and required 1:1 therapeutic dining assistance with all oral intake. The Care Plan instructed staff to ensure the head of the bed was elevated above 30 degrees, the resident took slow sips and bites, and had completed swallowing without pocketing food. There was no information indicating the resident's spouse (Resident 8) assisted Resident 25 with eating. On 1/8/23 at 11:42 AM Resident 8 stated she/he fed Resident 25 most of the time because the resident was less irritable and consumed more food when she/he assisted the resident. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to consistently document behaviors and update and implement care plan interventions to ensure residents with dementia maintained their highest practicable level of well-being for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 16 and 25) reviewed for dementia. This placed residents at risk for a lack of psychosocial well-being and increased behaviors. Findings include: 1. Resident 16 admitted to the facility in 2015 with diagnoses including dementia and anxiety. The 11/5/22 Annual MDS indicated Resident 16 was rarely/never understood and had memory deficits. The resident had physical, verbal and other behaviors multiple days during the seven-day look-back period. The 12/14/22 through 1/11/23 Behavior Task Sheet indicated the resident had behaviors including: crying, yelling/screaming, kicking/hitting, pushing, pinching/scratching/spitting, abusive language, grabbing, threatening behavior, and/or rejection of care 27 out of the 30 days reviewed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to not administer a blood pressure medication according to physician ordered parameters for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#15) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for low blood pressure. Findings include: Resident 15 was re-admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including high blood pressure. Resident 15's physician's orders as of 1/11/23 included amlodipine besylate (treats high blood pressure) every day at bedtime and to hold the medication if the resident's systolic (the upper number in a blood pressure reading) blood pressure was less than 110. Resident 15's 1/2023 MAR revealed the amlodipine besylate was administered on 1/2/23, 1/3/23 and 1/4/23 when the resident's systolic blood pressure was less than 110. On 1/10/23 at 1:10 PM Staff 3 (Corporate Nurse Consultant) verified Resident 15 was administered amlodipine besylate on 1/2/23, 1/3/23 and 1/4/23 when the resident's systolic blood pressure was less than 110.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#15) reviewed for medication administration. The facility had 12 errors out of 25 opportunities for an error rate of 48 percent. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include: The facility's Administering Medications policy revised 12/2012 indicated residents could self-administer their own medications only if the physician and the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team determined the resident had the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Resident 15 was re-admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 15's physician's orders as of 1/11/23 included the following medications: - omeprazole (for heartburn) - calcitriol (for inflamed gall bladder) - calcium carbonate (antacid) - creon (for inflamed gall bladder) - Elequis (prevents blood clots) - hydroclorothiazide (treats high blood pressure) - imatinib mesylate (chemotherapy) - laratadine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accommodate resident food preferences for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#25) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for weight loss. Findings include: Resident 25 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. The 11/30/22 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 25 was rarely/never understood and required extensive assistance with eating. On 1/10/21 at 12:50 PM Resident 25 was observed sitting up for lunch with staff present in the room. The resident's lunch tray was observed to have Mexican food including: rice, beans, and chicken mole. The meal card on Resident 25's tray indicated the resident disliked Mexican food. Staff 18 (CNA) verified the resident was brought food that was on her/his dislikes list and stated the resident often received the wrong food items. On 1/12/23 at 9:29 AM Staff 16 (Dietary Manager) acknowledged the food preference concern.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$85,768 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $85,768 — penalty dated 2024-02-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVAMERE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 3 of 53.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of EugeneEugene, OR 1 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of LebanonLebanon, OR 2 of 5Avamere At Pacific RidgeTacoma, WA 2 of 5Avamere Health Services Of Rogue ValleyMedford, OR 2 of 5Avamere Olympic Rehabilitation Of SequimSequim, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation At Park WestSeattle, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of IssaquahIssaquah, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of ShorelineSeattle, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation of BurienBurien, WA 2 of 5Avamere Riverpark Of EugeneEugene, OR 2 of 5Avamere Transitional Care At SunnysideSalem, OR 3 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of HillsboroHillsboro, OR 4 of 5Avamere Court At KeizerKeizer, OR 4 of 5Avamere Crestview Of PortlandPortland, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation At RidgemontPort Orchard, WA 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of ClackamasGladstone, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Junction CityJunction City, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of King CityTigard, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of NewportNewport, OR 4 of 5Avamere Transitional Care Of Puget SoundTacoma, WA 4 of 5Richmond Beach RehabShoreline, WA 4 of 5The PEARL AT KRUSE WAYLake Oswego, OR 5 of 5Avamere At Three FountainsMedford, OR 5 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Cascade ParkVancouver, WA 5 of 5Queen Anne HealthcareSeattle, WA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ARISO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/06/2006
ARI OPERATIONS, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/06/2006
AVAMERE GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/06/2006
KARL RICKARD MILLER JR REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/11/2011
MILLER, KARLIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/20/2001
MIDCAP FINCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/25/2013
CAVALLO, GLENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2025
FEAKIN, CODYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FUNDERBERG, MICHELLEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
HASKINS, DAMIENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/01/2025
HILL, KEVINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/12/2022
HOSKINS, TONIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2025
INSKEEP, TODDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/21/2022
KOFSTAD, MARYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/13/2024
MUNRO, JOLYNNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
OKOLI, IKEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2025
POLSON, JUSTINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/10/2025
POWELSON, MICHELEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2015
REID, MISTYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2025
SANDERS, AMANDAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2025
SIMPSON, ANDREWIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
STRUNK, COLBYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
VANDERZANDEN, CARRIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
AVAMERE HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2005
AVAMERE SKILLED ADVISORS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2005
ANGERHOFER, NICOLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
DANA, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2022
DOEPKER, ANDREAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/08/2023
JAMES, ALLENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2022
LEE, CARIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
PRESLEY, YOLANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
VELLODY, NITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2020
MOSS ADAMS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2009
DAVIS, JULIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
GAMES, KIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
STAPLES, CAROLYNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/05/2023
YOUNT, MARKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 67 rows in the source record cover these 37 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 6%Other / private 30%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$549per resident / day
operating cost
$16,703per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$572per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385125. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next