Avamere Crestview Of Portland
6530 SW 30th Avenue, Portland, OR 97239 · For profit - Corporation · 127 certified beds · (503) 244-7533 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.5% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.1% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 1.4% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.4% | 2.0% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.9% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.3% | 2.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.8% | 20.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.1% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.6% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 5.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.3% | 21.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.7% | 13.9% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.3% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.5% | 81.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.1% | 21.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.3% | 16.1% | 12.0% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.0%CMS range 42.5–68.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.0–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 3.7–13.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 65.3 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.19 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.43 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure standard and contact precautions for infection control were performed by staff. This failure, determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation, resulted in 30 residents identified and treatment prescribed for potential scabies (a contagious skin disease marked by itching and small raised red spots caused by mites). This placed all residents at risk for contracting scabies and the psychosocial impact related to symptoms, isolation, pain, and discomfort and serious harm and/or death. Findings include: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website, dated 11/2010, section: Parasites - Scabies indicated the following: -On a person, scabies mites can live for as long as 1-2 months. Off a person, scabies mites usually do not survive more than 48-72 hours. Scabies mites will die if exposed to a temperature of 50°C (122°F) for 10 minutes. -Possible complications include bacterial skin infections that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to safely transfer a resident according to the care plan for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#264) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in Resident 264 experiencing severe pain related to a right hip dislocation and requiring hospitalization and surgery. Findings include: Resident 264 was admitted to the facility in 8/2022 with diagnoses including fracture of the right femur. Resident 264's admission MDS revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance from two or more staff with transfers. Resident 264's 8/24/22 ADL Self Care Performance Deficit Care Plan indicated the following: - Weight bearing as tolerated to right lower extremity, posterior hip precautions; and - The resident required two staff participation with transfers. A 9/16/22 Incident Report prepared by Staff 26 (LPN) revealed the following: - Staff 27 (Agency CNA) was told in shift report that Resident 264 needed the assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-06-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to promptly intervene when a resident experienced unplanned significant weight loss for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#12) reviewed for medications. This resulted in an unplanned severe weight loss for Resident 12 and placed residents at increased risk of unplanned weight loss. Findings include: Resident 12 admitted to the facility in 2/2016 with diagnoses including dementia. Record review of Resident 12's past year of Nutritional Assessments revealed the RD completed an assessment on 6/21/22 and 2/14/23. The 2/14/23 assessment was completed after a re-admission. No formal assessments were found reguarding weight loss after 2/14/23. Resident 12's 2/2023 physician order directed staff to provide a general regular diet with pureed texture and mildly thick consistency liquids. The order directed staff to weigh her/him once a month. Resident 12's 2/2023 nutritional care plan indicated a potential problem related to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and expired medications were removed from the cart immediately for 3 of 5 sampled medication carts reviewed for medication. This placed residents at risk for receiving expired medications. Findings include: The facility's 1/2025 Medication Storage/Storage of Medication policy instructed facility staff to immediately remove from stock outdated medications and note the date insulin vials and pens were first used.On 2/11/26 at 12:45 PM the 30/40 hall medication cart was observed to have the following:- One bottle of Fish oil 1000 mg with an expiration of 12/2025- One bottle of Aspirin 325mg with an expiration of 10/2025On 2/11/26 at 12:45 PM Staff 21 (CMA) confirmed the expired dates on the medications and stated they should have been removed and destroyed.On 2/11/26 at 1:14 PM the treatment cart number two was observed to have the following:- One vial of Humalog (insulin) without an open date written on it. The 7/2023 manufacturer's instructions revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for safe self-administration of medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration and adverse medication side effects. Findings include:The facility's Self-Administration of Medications policy, dated 2/2021, indicated the following: -Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team determines it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. -The interdisciplinary team assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate for the resident. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 6/2025 with diagnoses including fracture of the fourth lumbar vertebra (a break in the bone of the lower spine often causing severe pain or nerve damage). Resident 3's 12/23/25 Significant Change MDS indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain consent, assess, monitor and reevaluate a resident for a wheelchair seatbelt for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#60) reviewed for restraints. This placed residents at risk for being restrained. Findings include:Resident 60 was admitted to the facility in 9/2021 with diagnoses including cerebral palsy (a group of life-long neurological disorders appearing in infancy or early childhood that affect movement, muscle tone, posture and balance), stroke, dementia and muscle weakness. Resident 60's 1/17/26 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident used a wheelchair and no restraints were used. Review of Resident 60's clinical record revealed no documentation to indicate the resident was assessed, care planned or monitored for the use of the wheelchair seatbelt. There was no evidence a physician order was obtained, and the risks and benefits of the wheelchair seatbelt were not reviewed with the resident or resident representative since 9/3/24. Resident 60's care plan did not include the use of a wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers and necessary care and assistance to maintain good grooming and hygiene for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 31 and 68) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of personal hygiene and dignity. Findings include: The facility's Activities of Daily Living policy, dated 7/2025, indicated residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living independently would receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene. 1. Resident 68 was admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spine) and diabetes. Resident 68's 3/17/24 care plan indicated the resident had mixed bowel and bladder incontinence. Resident 68's 12/21/25 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident had mild to moderate cognitive impairments and required partial to moderate assistance with showering. The 2/6/26 updated shower schedule indicated Resident 68 was scheduled for showers on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activities program for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 35 and 43) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk of a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life. Findings include: The facility's Activity Program, dated 11/2025, indicated the following: -The Activities Program is provided to support the well-being of resident and to encourage both independence and community interaction. -Activities offered are based on the comprehensive resident-centered assessment and the preferences of each resident. -Our activity programs are designed to encourage maximum individual participation and are geared to the individual resident's needs. -Our activity programs consist of individual, small group and large group activities that are designed to meet the needs and interest of each resident. 1.Resident 43 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with diagnoses including stroke and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 43's 2/2/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff followed care plans related to fall safety for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 3, 6 and 35) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for continued falls and potential injury. Findings include: The facility's Falls and Fall Risk Managing policy, dated 10/2025, indicated the following: -Based on previous evaluations and current data, staff would identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. -The staff, with the input of the provider, would implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factors of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls. 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 6/2025 with diagnoses including fracture of the fourth lumbar vertebra (a break in the bone of the lower spine often causing severe pain or nerve damage). Resident 3's Morse Fall Scale (an evidence-based assessment of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors received trauma-informed care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#35) reviewed for mood. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization and decreased quality of life. Findings include:The facility's 8/2025 Trauma-Informed and Culturally Competent Care Policy instructed the following:-All residents were screened for possible exposure to traumatic events. -The initial screening was utilized to identify the need for further assessment and care.-Individualized care plans were developed to address past trauma in collaboration with the resident and family, as appropriate. -The care plan was to identify and decrease exposure to triggers that may re-traumatize the resident and incorporate language needs, culture, cultural preferences, norms and values. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility in 7/2024 with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing terrifying, life-threatening or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. There were 2 errors out of 25 medication administration opportunities, resulting in an 8% error rate. This placed residents at risk of receiving a sub-therapeutic medication dose and reduced medication efficacy. Findings include:The 2020 insulin NPH (Humulin N) KwikPen Manufacturer Instructions For Use and the 2014 insulin aspart FlexPen Manufacturer Patient Fact Sheet - How To Use FlexPen indicated the insulin pens should be primed with two units of insulin prior to each administration to ensure the correct dose was delivered.Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with diagnoses including aftercare following a liver transplant. Resident 9's 1/26/26 admission MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact.Resident 9's 2/2026 Physician Orders included the following:- insulin NPH (an intermediate-acting medication for diabetes) 100 units/ml inject 21 units in the morning.- insulin aspart (a fast-acting medication for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appetizing and palatable food for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#43) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs and poor intake. Findings include: The facility's Food and Nutrition Services Policy, dated 10/2017, indicated the following: Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident.Resident 43 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with diagnoses including stroke and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). On 2/9/26 at 2:17 PM, Resident 43 stated she/he was on a puree diet, and it was yuck, everything was bland, and the potatoes tasted like powder.A review of the 2/11/26 lunch menu revealed the facility was to provide: [NAME] herbed baked chicken, roasted red potatoes, cauliflower au gratin, dinner roll with margarine, pumpkin cake with whipped topping and beverage.On 2/11/26 at 11:34 AM kitchen meal service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for 4 of 7 facility halls reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an unkempt environment. Findings include: Observations of the facility's general environment and residents' rooms from 9/9/24 through 9/13/24 identified the following issues: -Rooms 20, 23, 24, 27, 33, 35, 36, 38, 40, 45, 46, 49, 60, 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 68 and 69 had resident doors with missing pieces of wood with sharp/jagged edges on the lower portions of the doors. -Rooms 61, 64, 65, 68, 69, 71 and 78 had walls where the in room sinks were with gouges along the walls, missing paint and exposed drywall. -room [ROOM NUMBER]-1 had a chunk of missing paint on the wall behind the resident bed. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had broken blinds and a jagged edge with missing paint and exposed drywall behind the resident door. -room [ROOM NUMBER]-1 had large scratches to the right of the head of bed and across the room from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide staff with appropriate competencies and skills to attain and maintain the highest practicable well-being for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#20) reviewed for communications and activities. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: The facility's 2/2022 Trauma-Informed and Culturally Competent Care policy indicated all staff received orientation and in-service training regarding cultural competency as an aspect of resident-centered care. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 7/2016 with diagnoses including dementia. On 9/11/2024 at 11:59 AM Staff 14 (CNA) stated he had been an employee at the facility for over a year and had not received any cultural competency training. On 9/12/2024 at 10:56 AM Staff 15 (CNA) stated she had been an employee at the facility for over 12 years and had never participated or completed any cultural competency training. On 9/13/2024 at 12:42 PM Staff 4 (Staffing Coordinator) stated she was unaware of any cultural competency training program at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 5 of 14 sampled residents (#s 7, 20, 34, 46 and 51) reviewed for behaviors, communication and sensory care, dental and PASARR. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs and decreased dignity. Findings include: The facility's 9/2004 Social Services Program Policy and Procedure revealed the following: -The social services program shall assist facility staff, family and friends of the resident to help meet the resident's personal and emotional needs. -Duties of the social services department include assessing the psychosocial and emotional needs of each resident, developing interventions to address residents' needs and preferences to ensure or enhance quality of life and dignity, making referrals as needed and documenting the outcomes and assisting each resident in obtaining appropriate clothing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in the facility's ice machine, dry storage, and dish drying area for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitary conditions. This placed residents at risk of potential infections related to foodborne pathogens and cross contamination. Findings include: 1. On 9/6/24 at 9:43 AM, the facility's ice machine was observed to drain onto the floor approximately six inches from the in-floor drain underneath the ice machine. The linoleum flooring under the ice machine was disintegrated and pulled away from the concrete floor. A puddle of brown, moldy water formed on the concrete floor and flowed underneath the linoleum and onto the floor around the ice machine and in the direct path to the walk-in freezer. A chunk of an unknown brown porous substance the approximate size of a baked potato was observed under the ice machine. Staff 10 (Dietary Manager) observed this, donned exam gloves and removed the item. She stated it looked like wadded up paper towels to collect the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to follow proper infection control precautions for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#40) reviewed for catheter care and while handling clean laundry for 1 of 1 laundry areas. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination and risk of infection. Finds include: According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Guidelines for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (2009) III. B.2: -Keep the collecting bag below the level of the bladder at all times. Do not rest the bag on the floor. 1. Resident 40 admitted to the facility in 9/2022 with diagnoses including a urinary tract infection. On 9/11/2024 at 12:14 PM Resident 40 was observed to ambulate independently in his/her wheelchair as his/her catheter bag dragged on the ground. On 9/11/2024 at 12:17 PM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed catheter bags should not drag on the ground. 2. On 9/12/2024 at 2:06 PM Staff 19 (Housekeeping) was observed to push an uncovered rolling rack of clean resident clothing down the hall. The rack was left unattended in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dignity for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#23). This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity. Findings include: Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with a diagnosis of dementia. Resident 23's Annual MDS completed on 3/14/2024 indicated Resident 23 was significantly cognitively impaired. Resident 23's revised 8/16/2024 Care Plan indicated Resident 23 had meals served on Styrofoam dishware. On 9/9/2024 through 9/11/2024 between the hours of 11:49 AM and 1:15 PM Resident 23 was obseved to eat meals off of Styrofoam dishware. On 9/12/2024 at 10:20 AM Staff 18 (LPN) stated the facility had not attempted to implement alternatives such as plasticware. Staff 18 confirmed the loss of dignity related to residents eating from Styrofoam dishware. On 9/12/2024 at 11:00 AM Staff 10 (Dietary Manager) acknowledged the use of Styrofoam dishware was a dignity concern. On 9/13/2024 at 2:06 PM Staff 1(Administrator) acknowledged the use of Styrofoam dishware was a dignity concern.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a consent was obtained prior to administering antipsychotic medications to residents for 1 of 5 sampled residents(#24) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for being uninformed about their medications. Findings include: Resident 24 was admitted to the facility in 7/2024 with diagnoses including fracture and dementia. Resident 24's 7/30/24 Physician Order indicated the resident was prescribed valproic (antipsychotic) for schizoaffective disorder. Resident 24's 8/2024 and 9/2024 MARs revealed the resident received valproic daily. Review of Resident 24's health record revealed no documentation to indicate the resident was informed in advance of the risks and benefits of valproic. On 9/11/24 at 9:57 AM Staff 13 (RNCM) reviewed Resident 24's health record, acknowledged there was no documentation to indicate the resident was informed of the risks and benefits of valproic and confirmed a consent was not obtained from Resident 24 or her/his representative prior to the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to honor a resident's preference to get dressed for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#34) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of choices and self-determination. Findings include: Resident 34 was admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including blindness. Resident 34's 10/9/23 admission MDS indicated she/he was severely visually impaired, usually able to make her/himself understood to others, required substantial-to-maximal assistance for upper body dressing and was dependent on staff for lower body dressing. The MDS also indicated it was somewhat important to the resident to be able to choose what clothes she/he wanted to wear. Resident 34's 7/15/24 ADL Self Performance Deficit Care Plan revealed the resident was totally dependent on staff to get dressed. On 9/9/24 at 12:24 PM and 9/10/24 at 1:21 PM Resident 34 was observed in bed and wore a hospital gown. Resident 34 stated it was not her/his preference to wear a hospital gown and staff did not offer to assist her/him…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency an allegation of abuse for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#267) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings include: Resident 267 was admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including malignant brain cancer. A 9/9/24 Grievance communication Form stated Resident 267 had concerns related to her/his night shift CNA not being responsive to the call light and not friendly during care. The DNS and LPN Resident Care Manager spoke with Resident 267 and her/his family about the concerns and determined Resident 267 can be overstimulated by noise and her/his care plan was updated. The conclusion of the grievance stated the CNA would not be working with Resident 267 anymore. On 9/10/24 at 10:00 AM Resident 267 stated on her/his first night in the facility there was a night shift CNA who did not take care of her/him and took her/his call light away. Resident 267 stated she/he called her/his brother to get assistance. Resident 267 was tearful…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#267) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings include: Resident 267 was admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including malignant brain cancer. A 9/9/24 Grievance communication Form stated Resident 267 had concerns related to her/his night shift CNA not being responsive to the call light and not friendly during care. The DNS and LPN Resident Care Manager spoke with Resident 267 and her/his family about the concerns and determined Resident 267 can be overstimulated by noise, her/his care plan was updated. The conclusion of the grievance stated the CNA would not be working with Resident 267 anymore. On 9/10/24 at 10:00 AM Resident 267 stated on her/his first night in the facility there was a night shift CNA who did not take care of her/him and took her/his call light away. Resident 267 stated she/he called her/his brother to get assistance. Resident 267 was tearful when she/he described…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for 2 of 12 sampled residents (#s 11 and 20) reviewed for communication, dental, and activities. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments. Findings include: 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with diagnoses including chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure (a condition where the left heart ventricle becomes stiff and does not pump blood efficiently) and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where there is not enough oxygen or there is too much carbon dioxide in the blood). A review of resident 11's 6/25/24 annual MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact and had no oral or dental issues. On 9/9/24 at 11:03 AM Resident 11 was observed to have teeth that were gray and jagged. Resident 11 stated she/he needed dental care and she/he had tooth decay, missing and broken teeth. Resident 11 stated she/he used a medicated mouthwash prescribed by her/his doctor to treat the infections in her/his teeth. She/he also said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to incorporate PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level II recommendations into residents' assessments and care plans for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 51) reviewed for PASARR coordination of care. This placed residents who have a mental health disorder at risk for delayed care and services to attain their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings include: Resident 51 was admitted to the facility in 6/2024 with diagnoses including stroke, dysphasia, post traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety. On 7/3/24 a PASARR Level II Mental Health Evaluation was conducted for Resident 51. The reason for the referral was noted as .concern about mood-related symptoms and history of depression and anxiety symptoms . The evaluation included the following recommendations: -Participation in support groups for individuals who have suffered a stroke. -A daily plan for that would be helpful for the resident to deal with difficult situations. Resident 51's 9/2024 MAR included the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#267) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 267 was admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including anxiety, depression and a history of mental and behavioral disorders. On 9/10/24 at 10:00 AM Resident 267 stated on her/his first night in the facility there was a night shift CNA who did not take care of her/him and took her/his call light away. Resident 267 stated she/he called her/his brother to get assistance. Resident 267 was tearful when she/he described the night. A 9/10/24 admission MDS indicated Resident 267 had mild cognitive impairment. On 9/12/24 at 12:37 PM Resident 267 tearfully stated the incident that happened on her/his first night in the facility reminded her/him of the pain she/he had from childhood trauma related to her/his mother putting her/him in a dark room and being told to be quiet. A 9/12/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise care plans for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 19 and 28) reviewed for pressure ulcers and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 28 was readmitted to the facility in 7/2024 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids). Resident 28's 7/7/24 admission MDS revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, had a feeding tube and required supervision or touching assistance with eating. Resident 28's 7/12/24 Dining Safety Care Plan revealed the following: -The resident was not to use straws. -The resident was to be in the atrium for meals. On 9/9/24 at 1:02 PM Resident 28 was observed in her/his room, in bed. Resident 28 ate from her/his lunch tray that was placed on an overbed table in front of the resident. A water pitcher with a straw was observed next to the lunch tray. On 9/10/24 at 9:59 AM and 9/11/24 at 9:14 AM a partially empty water pitcher with a straw was observed on Resident 28's overbed table…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a recapitulation of the resident's stay was completed accurately for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#261) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for unmet discharge needs. Findings include: Resident 261 was admitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (inability to move) of the right dominant side. A 1/1/24 Progress Note indicated Resident 261 had two pressure ulcers noted on her/his right and left buttock. A 2/8/24 Progress Note indicated Resident 261 had multiple superficial open areas and excoriation noted to buttocks. A review of Physician Orders indicated Resident 261 had a 2/28/24 order to apply calmoseptin barrier cream daily and as needed to Resident 261's buttocks. A 3/14/24 Discharge Skin Summary stated Resident 261 had no skin impairments at time of discharge. A 3/14/24 Discharge Summary stated Resident 261 had treatment orders for A&D cream to bilateral lower extremities with no evidence of any other treatment orders. A 3/19/24 Discharge MDS stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services in communication for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#20) reviewed for communication. This placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life and potential decline in their ability to carry out activities of daily living. Findings include: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 7/2016 with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 20's 6/28/24 Care Plan indicated a language barrier due to the Resident's primary language being Laotian or Thai. Interventions indicated in the resident's Care Plan instructed staff to contact Optimal Interpreter Services for assistance in communication. Resident 20's 6/29/2024 Annual MDS revealed the primary language for Resident 20 was English and he/she needed or preferred to use an interpreter to communicate with a doctor and health care staff. The Communication CAA completed 6/19/2024 indicated language was a concern as the primary language for Resident 20 was Laotian or Thai. On 9/9/2024 at 2:17 PM Staff 14 (CNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received ADL care for 1 of 4 residents (#33) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident 33 was readmitted to the facility in 6/2022 with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 33's 3/20/24 Annual MDS revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required substantial/maximal assistance with upper body dressing and was dependent upon staff for lower body dressing. Resident 33's 4/12/24 ADL Self Care Performance Deficit Care Plan indicated the resident required assistance from one staff to get dressed. On 9/9/24 at 2:34 PM Resident 33 was observed in her/his room in bed and wore a hospital gown. Resident 33 was unable to answer any questions about her/his care or routine. On 9/11/24 at 11:50 AM and on 9/12/24 at 11:58 AM Resident 33 was observed in her/his room and sat in her/his wheelchair. The resident was dressed in a pink dress with yellow flowers. On 9/12/24 at 10:40 AM Staff 23 (CNA) and at 10:52 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a person-centered activity program for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 7, 20, and 33) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings include: The facility's 2/2023 Activity Evaluation Policy indicated the following: -An activity evaluation was conducted as part of the comprehensive assessment to help develop an activities plan that reflected the choices and interests of the resident. -The resident's activity evaluation was conducted by activity department personnel, in conjunction with other staff who evaluate related factors such as functional level, cognition and medical conditions that may affect activities participation. -The resident's lifelong interests, spirituality, life roles, goals, strengths, needs and activity pursuit patterns and preferences were included in the evaluation. -The activity evaluation was used to develop an individual activities care plan that allowed the resident to participate in activities of his/her choice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure treatment and services to maintain hearing abilities were received for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#34) reviewed for communication and sensory care. This placed residents at risk for unmet hearing needs. Findings include: The facility's 2/2018 Care of Hearing Impaired Resident Policy revealed staff will assist the resident (or representative) with locating available resources, scheduling appointments and arranging transportation to obtain needed services. Resident 34 was admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including blindness. Resident 34's 10/17/23 Communication Care Plan revealed the following: -The resident had a hearing deficit. -The resident's family visited daily and could help answer specific questions for the resident. Resident 34's 7/11/24 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, experienced moderate difficulty hearing and was able to make her/himself understood. Resident 34's 9/2024 Physician Orders directed auditory consults as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess pressure ulcers and update care plans for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#19) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 2016 with diagnoses including a stroke. A 9/10/24 review of Resident 19's physician orders revealed an 8/23/24 order for her/his right ear to clean with normal saline, pat dry, leave open to air and monitor for signs of infection every day for a pressure sore. A 9/10/24 review of Resident 19's care plan revealed no evidence of a care plan for Resident 19's pressure ulcer on her/his right ear. A 9/10/24 review of Resident 19's medical record revealed no evidence of a wound assessment of her/his right ear pressure ulcer. On 9/11/24 at 10:04 AM Resident 19 was observed to have a wound on the front, external part of her/his right ear. The wound was red, raised and had a scab on it. The wound had the appearance of a stage 2 pressure ulcer (a wound with partial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services related to enteral (tube) feeding for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#28) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for nutritional complications and weight loss. Findings include: The facility's 11/2018 Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump Policy and Procedure revealed the following: -Check the label on the enteral formula against the physician order (prior to starting the feed). -Hang the feeding bag on the IV (intravenous) pole and label initials, date and time the formula was hung/administered and initial that the label was checked against the order directly on the formula bag. Resident 28 was readmitted to the facility in 7/2024 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids). Resident 28's 7/7/24 admission MDS revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, had a feeding tube and received more than 51 percent of her/his calories by way of tube feeding. Resident 28's 8/26/24 Physician Orders directed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors received trauma-informed care for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 7, 34, and 51) reviewed for mood. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization and decreased quality of life. Findings include: The facility's 8/2022 Trauma-Informed and Culturally Competent Care Policy and Procedure revealed the following: -Traumatic events included abuse, neglect, serious injury or illness, racism, war and historical trauma. -Universal screening of residents was to be performed, which included a brief, non-specialized identification of possible exposure to traumatic events. -Screening included information such as trauma history, trauma-related symptoms, concerns with sleep or intrusive behaviors, behavioral or interpersonal concerns, historical mental health diagnosis, substance abuse, protective factors and resources available and physical health concerns. -The initial screening identified the need for further assessment and care. -Individualized care plans were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper storage of biologicals on 1 of 1 medication rooms during random observations for medication storage. This placed residents at risk of unsafe access to stored biologicals. Findings include: On [DATE] at 2:32 PM two Pfizer COVID 19 vaccines were observed in the medication refrigerator with an expiration date of [DATE]. On [DATE] at 2:33 PM Staff 24 (CMA) verified the two Pfizer COVID 19 vaccines were expired. On [DATE] at 2:45 PM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed the two Pfizer COVID 19 vaccines expired on [DATE].
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#46) reviewed for dental care needs. This placed residents at risk for unmet dental needs. Findings include: Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that includes severe protein calorie malnutrition. Resident 46's 5/10/2024 admission Nursing Database assessment indicated the resident had no natural teeth, tooth fragments or missing teeth. An 8/13/2024 Physician Order instructed the facility to schedule dental, visionary, auditory, and podiatry consultations as indicated. No evidence was found in Resident 46's clinical record to indicate additional dental needs were offered to the resident. On 9/10/2024 at 2:30pm Resident 46 stated he had been interested in new dentures because it would make eating easier. On 9/11/2024 at 2:57pm Staff 5 (Social Services Director) stated that dental services were not offered to Resident 46. On 9/11/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free from accident hazards related to a mechanical lift for 1 of 2 sampled residents (# 7) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes. A 3/18/22 admission MDS identified Resident 7 had no cognitive impairment. A 3/18/22 care plan identified Resident 7 as a moderate risk for falls. A 7/8/23 Nursing Care Note stated Staff 11 (LPN) with the assitance of Staff 20 (CNA) misused a mechanical lift during the transfer of Resident 7 which caused the lift to tilt forward while moving Resident 7 backwards. Resident 7 was struck by the lift across the nose and left cheek. A 7/12/23 hospital record indicated Resident 7 was diagnosed with a closed head injury and concussion as a result of being struck by the mechanical lift on the left side of her/his face. On 1/25/24 at 12:32 PM Staff 11 (LPN Resident Care Manager) confirmed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate urinary incontinence care for 2 of 3 residents (#s 2 and 6) reviewed for incontinence care. This placed residents at risk for unmet bladder care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (a condition caused by impaired mobility, urinary urgency and incontinence). Resident 2's admission MDS identified the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident 2's 12/2/22 Care Plan revised on 4/28/23 indicated she/he had functional bladder incontinence due to her/his primary diagnosis. Resident 2's care interventions included frequent urinary checks, including brief changes and peri care. A 6/19/23 Witness Report indicated Resident 2 waited for over four hours to receive bladder incontinence care and Resident 2 urinated on her/his self. Review of bowel and bladder records for June of 2018 revealed a 4.5-hour delay between bladder incontinence care services. On 1/25/24 at 3:10 PM Staff 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an adequate number of qualified staff to ensure residents received adequate care and services for 1 of 3 residents (#2) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with a diagnosis of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (a condition caused by impaired mobility urinary urgency and incontinence). Resident 2's admission MDS identified the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident 2's 12/2/22 Care Plan indicated the resident had functional bladder incontinence due to her/his primary diagnosis. Resident 2's care interventions included frequent urinary checks including brief changes and peri care. A 6/19/23 Witness Report indicated Resident 2 waited for over four hours to receive bladder incontinence care which resulted in Resident 2 urinating on her/his self. A review of Resident 2's June 2018 bowel and bladder records revealed Resdient 2 was not provided bladder incontinence care from 5:08 PM to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medication for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#60) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include: Resident 60 was admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including diabetes. An 8/28/23 admission MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 60's 10/2023 Physician's orders revealed the resident was to receive: Insulin Lispro before meals and Insulin Glargine at bedtime. On 10/16/23 at 10:27 AM Resident 60 stated on 10/6/23 around 7:00 AM Staff 5 (Agency LPN) entered her/his room and administered the morning insulin dose. Resident 60 stated Staff 5 re-entered her/his room and quickly administered another shot of insulin. Resident 60 stated she/he asked Staff 5 if the medication was ordered by the physician and Staff 5 stated, Yes. Resident 60 noted the medication was labeled Tresiba (a long-acting insulin), an insulin not ordered for Resident 60. Resident 60 did not say…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal and mental abuse by Witness 2 (Visitor/spouse of Resident 2) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for verbal and mental abuse. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility 8/2023 with diagnoses including diabetes, PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) and major depression. Resident 1's 8/2023 admission MDS indicated a BIMS score of 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. The resident's 8/25/23 care plan revealed she/he was a PTSD survivor, was at risk for trauma and indicated a trigger was invasion of privacy. The care plan included a goal to prevent re-traumatization. An 8/28/23 admission Social History evaluation revealed Resident 1 had a history of trauma related to sexual abuse by a family member of the opposite sex. An 8/30/23 physician's progress note revealed Resident 1 received Prazosin (high blood pressure medication) for anxiety and experiencing reported nightmares…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for 1 out of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for lack of complete investigations to rule out abuse. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including diabetes, PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) and major depression. Resident 1's 8/2023 admission MDS indicated a BIMS score of 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 1's medical record revealed an Incident Report dated 9/18/23. The incident was described as a complaint of verbal abuse from a visitor of another resident, and uninvited entry into [her/his] room. The report lacked documentation of staff interviews regarding the incident between Resident 1 and Witness 2 (Visitor/spouse of Resident 2) on 9/17/23. The 9/18/23 Incident Report indicated abuse and neglect was unsubstantiated due to unable to anticipate visitors reaction and behavior. There was no documentation to describe how verbal and mental abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of trauma received trauma- informed care for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse and a safe environment. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including diabetes, PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) and major depression. Resident 1's 8/2023 admission MDS indicated a BIMS score of 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. The resident's 8/25/23 Care Plan revealed she/he was at risk for trauma and included triggers of invasion of privacy. The care plan included a goal to prevent re-traumatization. An 8/28/23 admission Social History evaluation revealed Resident 1 had a history of trauma related to sexual abuse by a family member of the opposite sex. An 8/30/23 physician's progress note revealed Resident 1 received Prazosin (high blood pressure medication) for anxiety and experiencing reported nightmares of reliving prior abuse. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft for 4 of 5 sampled residents (#s1, 9, 42 and 52) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for living in an unhomelike environment. Findings include: The facility's Personal Property Policy dated 8/2022 outlined the following: - The resident's personal belongings and clothing are inventoried and documented upon admission and updated as necessary. - The facility promptly investigates any complaints of misappropriation or mistreatment of resident property. 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including Cerebral Palsy (a condition that affects movement and coordination). Resident 1's 2/9/23 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact. A 3/20/23 Lost or Damaged Items Form signed by Staff 9 (Social Services Director) revealed the following: - Resident 1 was missing 15 pairs of socks, a blue sweatshirt, a black skirt and a short sleeve red top with sparkles.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to meet resident care needs in a timely manner for 6 of 6 resident halls reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely assistance and unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. On 6/7/23 at 1:07 PM Resident 13 stated it took a long time, at times up to an hour, for staff to answer her/his call light, especially at night and on the weekends. On 6/8/23 at 2:48 PM and 3:08 PM Staff 31 (LPN) and Staff 32 (CNA) stated there was not enough time in their shift to complete tasks and respond to the residents' needs timely. On 6/9/23 at 2:43 PM Staff 14 (LPN) stated it was difficult to get nursing tasks done timely. Staff 14 stated there was not enough staff to ensure timely care for residents who required the assistance from two staff. On 6/9/23 at 2:38 PM the following call light times were displayed on the nursing station two monitor and no staff were in each of the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were secured for 4 of 5 medication carts observed. This placed residents at risk for misappropriation of medications and drug diversion. Findings include: The facility's 11/2020 Storage of Medications Policy & Procedure specified medication carts containing drugs and biologicals were locked when not in use and unlocked medication carts were not left unattended. On 6/7/23 from 11:13 AM to 11:15 AM, an unlocked and unattended medication cart was observed at nursing station three. CNA and therapy staff were in the area and the contents of the cart were accessible. On 6/7/23 at 12:00 PM an unlocked and unattended medication cart was observed at nursing station two. Staff 14 (LPN) walked to the area and locked the cart. On 6/7/23 at 3:44 PM an unlocked and unattended medication cart was observed adjacent to room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 6/9/23 at 7:55 AM an unlocked and unattended medication cart was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for an undignified existence. Findings include: The facility's 2/2021 Dignity Policy & Procedure specified each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. The facility culture supports dignity and respect for residents by honoring resident goals, choices, preferences, values and beliefs. Individual preferences of the resident are identified through the assessment process. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in 8/2013 with diagnoses including quadriplegia and traumatic brain injury. Resident 14's 3/11/23 Annual MDS indicated the resident was non verbal, was able to respond with facial expressions and her/his hearing was adequate. Resident 14's Care Plan indicated the resident moved her/his left leg, smiled and enjoyed having staff chat with her/him.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with a baseline care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#115) reviewed for new admissions. This placed residents at risk for being uniformed of their plan of care. Findings include: The faility's Care Plans-Baseline Policy, revised 12/2016, revealed the staff were to assure the resident's immediate care needs were met and maintained, and a basleline care plan would be developed with in 48 hours of admission. The ressident and their representative will be provided a summary of the baseline care plan. Resident 115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoporosis (brittle bones). Review of Resident 115's medical record indicated no evidence of a baseline care plan. On 6/7/23 at 3:20 PM Resident 115 stated she/he had not received a copy of her/his baseline care plan. On 6/12/23 at 10:29 Staff 30 (LPN/Resident Care Manager) stated Resident 115 was provided a copy of her/his care plan at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement care plans for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#114) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 114 was admitted to the facility in 3/2023 with diagnoses including wrist fracture. Record review of Resident 114's 3/2023 care plan revealed she/he required assistance from one person to complete colostomy bag (small pouch used to collect waste from the body) care. In an interview on 6/12/23 at 11:45 AM Resident 114 confirmed on 4/2/23 she/he did not receive assistance when she called for help to empty her/his full colostomy bag and the bag of waste exploded all over her/himself and the floor. Resident 114 stated she/he was very embarrassed when this occurred. In the same interview Witness 4 (Spouse) stated he came to the facility and helped to clean Resident 114 after the colostomy bag explosion and staff placed a towel over the bowel contents on the bathroom floor. A facility incident report dated 4/2/23 revealed Resident 114 experienced a full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure comprehensive, person-centered care plans for ADLs and nutrition were revised for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s1 and 24) reviewed for dental and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes. Resident 1's 2/9/23 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 1's 5/12/23 Annual MDS revealed the resident ate independently and required set-up assistance. Resident 1's 5/17/23 ADL Self-Care Care Plan indicated the resident required assistance to eat. On 6/13/23 at 10:24 AM Staff 12 (CNA) and at 2:06 PM Staff 11 (CNA) stated Resident 1 ate independently. On 6/14/23 at 10:45 AM Staff 13 (RNCM) stated Resident 1 required set-up assistance at mealtimes and otherwise ate independently. Staff 13 reviewed Resident 1's Care Plan and confirmed it was inaccurate and needed to be updated. On 6/14/23 at 1:38 PM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged the findings and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for increased swelling and discomfort. Findings include: Resident 24 was admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles) following stroke. Resident 24's 3/22/23 Annual MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 24's 5/31/23 Physician Orders indicated the following: - Apply size F tubigrip (provides continuous support for the management of strains, sprains, and swelling) to left forearm due to swelling in right hand, on in AM and off at HS. On 6/7/23 at 1:10 PM Resident 24 was observed sitting in her/his wheelchair with her/his left arm hanging down to the side of her/his wheelchair. Resident 24 was not a wearing tubigrip on her/his left arm and all five fingers on her/his left hand were swollen. Resident 24 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure treatment and services to maintain vision abilities were provided for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for communication and sensory care. This placed residents at risk for unmet vision needs. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes. Resident 1's 2/9/23 Quarterly MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed a prescription for eyeglasses dated 5/23/23. On 6/7/23 at 2:00 PM Resident 1 was observed without eye glasses and stated she/he had trouble seeing out of both of her/his eyes. Resident 1 stated she informed Staff 13 (RNCM) and her/his eye doctor she/he was interested in obtaining eye glasses. Resident 1 stated she/he did not understand why she/he could not get eye glasses. On 6/13/23 at 2:34 PM Staff 9 (Social Services Director) stated she asked residents on a quarterly basis about their interest in scheduling a vision appointment and/or having glasses. If the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility received appropriate services and equipment for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for worsening contractures. Findings include: The facility's Resident Mobility and Range of Motion Policy revised 7/2017 indicated the following: - Residents with limited mobility will receive appropriate services, equipment and assistance to maintain or improve mobility unless reduction in mobility is unavoidable. - The care plan will include specific interventions, exercises and therapies to maintain, prevent avoidable decline in, and/or improve mobility and range of motion. - Interventions may include therapies, the provision of necessary equipment, and/or exercises and will be based on professional standards of practice and be consistent with state laws and practice acts. - The care plan will include the type, frequency, and duration of interventions, as well as measurable goals and objectives. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to determine if a resident's clinical condition necessitated urinary catheterization and failed to obtained a physician order for urinary catheterization for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#11) reviewed for urinary catheters. This placed residents at risk of unnecessary urinary catheterization and infections. Findings include: Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 4/2021 with diagnoses including diabetes. On 6/7/23 at 12:18 PM Resident 11 was observed with a urinary catheter bag and tubing in place. The 4/26/23 Annual MDS, revealed Resident 11 had an indwelling urinary catheter, and was not on a toileting program. Review of Resident 11's medical records did not provide a clinical diagnosis for the use or a physician order for the use of a urinary catheter. On 6/13/23 at 12:08 PM Staff 2 (DNS) and Staff 35 (LPN/Resident Care Manager), confirmed Resident 11 had no clinical diagnosis or physician order for the placement of an indwelling catheter.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders and failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly maintained for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for adverse respiratory effects and discomfort. Findings include: The facility's 10/2010 Oxygen Administration Policy & Procedure specified the following: - Ensure the proper flow of oxygen was being administered; - Check the humidifying bottle to be sure it was in good working order, there was water in the humidifying bottle, the water level was high enough that the water bubbled and re-check to ensure adequate water level. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 9/2022 with diagnoses including respiratory failure. Resident 6's 5/4/23 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident used oxygen. Resident 6's 6/2023 Physician Orders included the following: - Oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal cannula; - Ensure foam covers were in place around nasal cannula tubing; - Oxygen tubing changed every week, labeled with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to limit orders for PRN antipsychotic medication to 14 days and not renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluated the resident for the appropritateness of medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (# 42) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects for the use of antipsychotic medication. Findings include: Resident 42 was admitted to the facility in 1/2022 with diagnoses including dementia, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, anxiety and depression. Record review on 6/12/23 revealed Resident 42 was ordered PRN Olanzapine (antipsychotic to treat mental disorders) 5mg every six hours to start 1/23/23 with no end date for the order. Resident 42 was given the medication on the following dates; -1/31/23 -2/3/23 - refused the mediation on 3/14/23, 3/15/23 and 3/16/23. Record review on 6/12/23 revealed Resident 42 was ordered PRN Quetiapine (antipsychotic to treat mental disorder) 25mg every six hours to start 1/23/23 with no end date for the order.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-06-15 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports (DCSDR) were completed, current and accurately reflected the actual staff working each shift for 5 of 7 days reviewed for staff postings. This placed residents and visitors at risk for inaccurate daily staffing information. Findings include: Observations of the DCSDR postings from 6/7/23 through 6/13/23 revealed the following days when the current DCSDR was not posted or the census, staff type, number of staff and hours worked was missing: - The 6/7/23 day shift number of staff and hours worked columns for the RN and LPN were blank; - The 6/8/23 evening shift census, staff type, number of staff and hours worked columns were blank; - The 6/9/23 DCSDR was not posted; - The 6/11/23 evening shift census, staff type, number of staff and hours worked columns were blank; - The 6/12/23 day shift census was blank. On 6/9/23 at 4:08 PM and 6/14/23 at 2:15 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated the DCSDR was supposed to be accurate and completed at the beginning of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVAMERE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIDCAP FINCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/22/2010 |
| ADAMS, NANCY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| CAVALLO, GLEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 06/01/2025 |
| FEAKIN, CODY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| FUNDERBERG, MICHELLE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| HILL, KEVIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/12/2022 |
| HOSKINS, TONIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/01/2025 |
| INSKEEP, TODD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/21/2022 |
| KOFSTAD, MARY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/13/2024 |
| MUNRO, JOLYNN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| OKOLI, IKE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 06/01/2025 |
| POLSON, JUSTIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/10/2025 |
| POWELSON, MICHELE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/25/2015 |
| REID, MISTY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2025 |
| SANDERS, AMANDA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 06/01/2025 |
| SIMPSON, ANDREW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| STRUNK, COLBY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| VANDERZANDEN, CARRIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| AVAMERE HEALTH SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/13/2025 |
| AVAMERE SKILLED ADVISORS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/03/2025 |
| DANA, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2022 |
| DAVIS, JULIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| DOEPKER, ANDREA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/28/2023 |
| GILES, HEATHERANN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| LAO, PHOI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/12/2024 |
| LARSON, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2020 |
| PRESLEY, YOLANDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/06/2025 |
| TIJERINA, SARAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/13/2025 |
| HAMPOIAN, ARAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/12/2025 |
| HENRICHON, GREGORY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/12/2025 |
| NEWELL, JO ANN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/12/2025 |
| AEQUOR HEALTHCARE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/20/2023 |
| CMG CIT ACQUISITION, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/18/2023 |
| CONSOLIDATED BILLING SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/24/1998 |
| CONVERDIA HEALTH STAFFING - THERAPIES | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/09/2024 |
| FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/12/2024 |
| INCOVATE SOLUTIONS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/21/2022 |
| KEVALA TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/2023 |
| MOSS ADAMS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2009 |
| NATIONAL STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/22/2023 |
| NURSA INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2023 |
| RANDE HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| SABRA HEALTH CARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/17/2017 |
| SABRA HEALTH CARE REIT INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/17/2017 |
| SABRA HEALTH CARE, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/17/2017 |
| VENTURA MEDSTAFF, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2024 |
| GAMES, KIM | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/15/2024 |
| HARRISON, LORI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/22/2021 |
| STAPLES, CAROLYN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/05/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 81 rows in the source record cover these 49 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385031. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.