Avamere Rehabilitation Of Shoreline
1250 Northeast 145th Street, Seattle, WA 98155 · For profit - Corporation · 115 certified beds · (206) 363-5856 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (93) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.3% | 14.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.7% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.4% | 1.0% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 39.8% | 17.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 2.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.5% | 17.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 3.5% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.0% | 93.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.6% | 22.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.4% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 68.8% | 82.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 11.9% | 19.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.2% | 13.4% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.22 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.95 | 1.52 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 163 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.0%CMS range 45.4–61.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.0%CMS range 6.4–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.3%CMS range 2.9–9.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.06 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 54.3 residents a day — about 47% occupied, or roughly 61 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.47 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.90 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.80 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
93 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 83 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a missing resident within the required reporting timeframe for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 2), reviewed for abuse reporting. The failure to notify law enforcement, the state agency and the failure to follow its policy requirement of immediate notification of the Administrator, Director of Nursing Services, the resident's legal representative, and the attending physician when a resident is missing placed the resident at risk for unidentified abuse and/or neglect.Findings included .Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition) showed, The facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, .are reported to the administrator of the facility and to other officials in accordance with State law through established procedures (including to the State survey and certification agency).Review of the facility's policy titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The failure to provide bathing care for a resident who was dependent on staff for assistance placed the resident at risk for poor hygiene, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living, reviewed in June 2026, showed, Residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). The policy further stated, Appropriate care and services are provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently.in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, and oral care).Review of the admission record printed on 06/15/2026 showed that Resident 1 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor a resident taking a diuretic (used to help remove extra fluid from the body) medication and failed to notify the provider of weight gain for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for quality of care. These failures placed residents at risk for unrecognized weight gain, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated July 2025, showed that A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.Review of the facility's policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated 02/2026, showed, Our facility promptly notifies.their attending physician.of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status.Review of the face sheet printed on 04/20/2026, showed that Resident 1 had Chronic Right Heart Failure [a long-term condition in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and implement physician orders for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP - a machine that helps a person breathe more easily while they sleep) treatment in a timely manner for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed the resident at risk for poor sleep quality, related medical complications, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician Services, revised in February 2021, showed Once a resident is admitted , orders for the resident's immediate care and needs can be provided by a physician.Review of a face sheet showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included obstructive sleep apnea (a condition when a person stops breathing over and over while they sleep because their airway keeps getting blocked) and a need for assistance with personal care.Review of Resident 1's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the State Agency within the required timeframe for 3 of 7 residents (Residents 1, 2 & 3), reviewed for abuse reporting. This failure placed the residents at risk for potential unidentified mistreatment and lack of protection due to unrecognized abuse.Findings included.Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, Sixth Edition, dated October 2025, showed Nursing Home responsibilities included:-Report all suspected incidents of abuse, neglect, financial exploitation, or misappropriation of property. -Notify the State Hotline of allegations immediately or as soon as resident is protected.-Log in state reporting log abuse and neglect.RESIDENT 1Review of a face sheet showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included need for assistance with personal care and unspecified dementia (a condition that affects the brain and makes it harder for a person to remember things,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 3 of 7 residents (Residents 1, 2 & 3), reviewed for abuse investigation. This failure placed the residents at risk for repeated incidents, unidentified abuse and/or neglect, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, Sixth Edition, dated October 2025, showed, A thorough investigation is a systematic collection and review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events. It seeks to determine if abuse, neglect, abandonment personal and/or financial exploitation or misappropriation of resident property occurred, and how to prevent further occurrences .All incidents require thorough investigation and reporting, as necessary, according to state and federal regulations.RESIDENT 1Review of a face sheet showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included need for assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement care plans for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The failure to develop/implement care plans for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and prosthesis (an artificial device that replaces a missing body part) care placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, reviewed in June 2025, showed that A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.ADLSReview of Resident 1's discharge Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 02/03/2026, showed Resident 1 needed substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) for personal hygiene. It further showed that Resident 1 had diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for ADLs. The failure to provide assistance with personal hygiene placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facilities policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLS), Supporting, reviewed in June 2025, showed Appropriate care and services are provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident, and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with.hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care).Review of Resident 1's discharge Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 02/03/2026, showed Resident 1 needed substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) for personal hygiene. It further showed that Resident 1 had diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood) diagnosis.Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 1 and 2) reviewed for resident-to-resident altercations. Resident 1 sustained skin injuries (a skin tear & bruises) when their arm was grabbed by another resident in the facility (Resident 3). The facility also failed to ensure Resident 2 was free from physical abuse when their hair was pulled by another resident in the facility (Resident 3). These failures had the potential to cause more than minimal physical harm, psychological harm, mental anguish and fear. Findings included. Review of the facility's Freedom from Abuse Policy, dated September 2022, documented that each resident has the right to be free from abuse. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to other residents. The abuse policy also showed that willful is defined in the definition of abuse and means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], Intellectual Disabilities [ID]; or related conditions (RC) are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care) screening form was completed, for an exempted hospital discharge resident who remained in the facility for more than 30 days for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for PASARR screening. This failure placed the residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services for their needs and/or lacking access to specialized services for individuals with identified mental health diagnoses or disabilities. Findings included .Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a required assessment) dated 09/24/2025 documented Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Level I PASRR assessment form dated 09/22/2025 showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 83 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and interventions were implemented to manage aggressive behaviors for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for resident-to-resident altercations. This failure had the potential to cause substantial injuries to residents, fear and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .<RESIDENT 3>Review of Resident 3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-a required assessment) assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS assessment also showed Resident 3 had severely impaired thinking and memory. Review of the facility incident investigation dated 11/28/2025 showed Resident 3 grabbed a residents [Resident 1] left arm who was talking in the hallway with another resident [Resident 2] in the facility. The resident [Resident 1] sustained a skin tear when Resident 3 grabbed their left arm. The skin tear measured 3.5 centimeters (cm-a unit of measurement) by 3.0 cm and had two bruises on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure notification about medication changes was provided to 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for changes in medication. The failure to notify Resident 1 that the medication Potassium Chloride (medication used to prevent and treat low potassium levels in the blood) would not be administered for thirteen days placed Resident 1 at risk for lack of knowledge about their medical condition and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 09/23/2025, showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included heart failure and insufficient kidney (filters that clean the blood by removing waste and extra fluid) function. The MDS further showed the resident had intact thinking and memory. In an interview on 11/25/2025 at 1:01 PM, Resident 1 stated, I did not know that the medication I took for Potassium was turned off [stopped], I know I did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and failed to ensure staff documented treatments in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for treatment administration. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, negative outcomes, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, dated April 2019, showed that Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The policy showed, The individual administering the medication initials the resident's MAR [Medication Administration Record] on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones. The policy further showed, Topical medications used in treatments are recorded on the resident's treatment record (TAR [Treatment Administration Record]).On 11/13/2025 at 1:17 PM, Staff D, Registered Nurse, stated nursing staff were responsible for following medication/treatment orders. Staff D stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) had the appropriate competencies, skills set and proficiencies to assess/evaluate wound care for 1 of 1 nursing staff (Staff E), reviewed for competent nurse staffing. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, inaccurate wound assessments, and adverse outcomes.Findings included .Review of facility's policy titled, Skin and Wound Monitoring and Management, dated August 2024, showed A licensed nurse will assess/evaluate at least weekly each area of alteration/injury, whether present on admission or developed after admission, which exists on the resident. This assessment/evaluation should include but not be limited to:1) Measuring the skin injury2) Staging the skin injury (when the cause is pressure)3) Describing the nature of the injury (e.g./ pressure, stasis, surgical incision)4) Describing the location of the skin alteration5) Describing the characteristics of the skin alteration6)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation and to take appropriate corrective action for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3), reviewed for abuse investigations. This failure placed the residents at risk for repeated incidents, unidentified abuse, and inappropriate corrective actions.Findings included .Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, Sixth Edition, dated October 2015, showed, A thorough investigation is a systematic collection and review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events .Federal law requires the nursing home to do a thorough investigation of the incident. In order for a facility to provide evidence of the thoroughness of the investigation the information must be recorded. It showed that a thorough investigation may require two phases of fact gathering which included phase one, initial investigation (within the first 24 hours) and phase two, extended investigation (after the first 24 hours). It…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice to ensure a clinical assessment was completed timely for a change of condition (a sign that something might be wrong and needs attention) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3), reviewed for assessment of care services. This failure placed the resident at risk of receiving delayed care and for potential negative outcomes.Review of the facility's policy titled, admission Assessment and Follow Up: Role of the Nurse, revised in September 2012, showed that The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The date and time of the assessment was performed and showed that reporting included report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice.Review of a electronic health record showed Resident 3 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the facility's document titled, Online Incident Report Facility/Agency Information, dated 07/08/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a therapeutic diet was provided as ordered for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 & 2), reviewed for therapeutic diets. This failure had the potential to cause unwanted weight gain, a decline in medical conditions, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Diets Available on the Menu, Revised June 2019 showed, Prescribed diets are provided to deliver nutrition for residents in the facility. In order to define and standardized, diet orders will be interpreted as follows to comply with the [facility name] approved diet manual and/or to enhance choices & quality of life while meeting the current resident nutrition needs.RESIDENT 1Review of Resident 1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) printed on 07/18/2025 showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes (A disease that occurs when your body cannot use insulin - is a hormone that helps your body use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired foods were discarded for 1 of 1 refrigerator (Solarium Room Residents' Refrigerator), and failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures were maintained within the required ranges for 1 of 1 dishwasher, reviewed for food service safety. In addition, the facility failed to follow reheating food requirements for 1 of 1 (Staff L). These failures placed all residents at risk of food-borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), unsanitary conditions, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Personal Food Storage, updated in [DATE], showed, food or beverage brought in from outside sources for storage in facility pantries, refrigeration units, or personal room refrigeration units will be monitored by designated facility staff for food safety .The manufacturer's use by/expiration date supersedes any facility labeled use by date. Review of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-17 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were evaluated and assessed, and/or physician orders were obtained for safe administration of medication for 5 of 19 residents (Residents 30, 34, 38, 10 & 5), reviewed for self-medication administration. This failure placed the residents at risk for inaccurate and unsafe medication administration, adverse side effects, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, revised in September 2004, showed that the facility would allow residents to self-administer medications if they choose. If the resident wishes to self-administer their medications, the Resident Care Manager (RCM) will evaluate potential by using the self-medication review form. If the RCM determines the resident can carry out this task in a safe and prudent manner, the physician will be notified, an order obtained, and the resident will be placed in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained for 4 of 19 residents (Residents 29, 13, 269 & 31), reviewed for environment. The failure to ensure resident rooms were free from broken light switches and soiled privacy curtains placed residents at risk for a less than homelike environment and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . RESIDENT 29 Observations on 05/13/2025 at 2:57 PM and on 05/15/2025 at 11:01 AM, showed the privacy curtains for Resident 29's room were dirty with a brown material on them. It further showed a broken pull cord above Resident 29's bed and plastic bags tied together being used as the pullcord. In an interview and joint observation on 05/15/2025 at 11:16 AM, Staff BB, Certified Nursing Assistant, stated that if they noticed something in disrepair in a resident's room, they would report to the nurse first, tell maintenance. A joint observation of Resident 29's room showed a broken pull cord above Resident 29's bed and plastic bags tied together being used as the pull cord. Staff BB…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-17 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit the resident Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) within the required timeframe for 4 of 6 residents (Residents 53, 25, 42 & 59), reviewed for transmitting MDS assessments. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.19.11, revised in October 2024, showed all Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified nursing homes and swing beds, or agents of those facilities, must transmit required MDS data records to CMS' Internet Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (iQIES). After completion of the required assessment and/or tracking records, each provider must create electronic transmission files that meet the requirements detailed in the current MDS 3.0 Data Submission Specifications.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-17 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 8 of 21 residents (Residents 26, 65, 51, 30, 21, 2, 48 & 39), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to ensure accurate assessments were coded on the MDS regarding Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], intellectual/developmental disabilities [ID/DD]), discharge status, bowel (gut) continence, oxygen, medication, urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine), and bowel patterns, placed the residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.19.1, dated October 2024, showed, .an accurate assessment requires collecting information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement care plans for 5 of 15 residents (Residents 3, 4, 29, 51 & 39), reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The failure to develop/implement care plans for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised in March 2022, showed that the comprehensive care plan includes measurable objectives and time frames .describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. RESIDENT 3 Review of Resident 3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 02/11/2025, showed that Resident 3 needed substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise comprehensive care plans for 4 of 9 residents (Residents 26, 2, 30 & 32), reviewed for care plan revision. The failure to revise the care plan that included interventions for Level II Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR-an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], Intellectual Disabilities [ID]; or related conditions), use of opioid (narcotic pain medication), self-administration of medication, oxygen use, and range of motion, placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised in March 2022, showed that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan included measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs was developed and implemented for each resident. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 3, 29 & 51), reviewed for ADLs. The failure to provide residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with personal hygiene placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, revised in March 2018, showed that Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. RESIDENT 3 Review of Resident 3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 02/11/2025, showed Resident 3 needed substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) for personal hygiene. It further showed that Resident 3 had diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 10, 38, 30 & 271), reviewed for respiratory care. The failure to label/date oxygen tubing, properly store oxygen tank, and obtain oxygen orders placed the residents at risk of respiratory infections, and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revised in October 2010, showed, staff verify that there is a physician's order .Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. RESIDENT 10 Review of Resident 10's face sheet printed on 05/12/2025, showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease (COPD - an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to lungs) and dyspnea (difficulty breathing). Review of the May 2025 physician orders printed on 05/12/2025, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-17 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing form was accurately completed with the census, actual number of staff, and the hours worked for each shift for 4 of 4 days (05/12/2025, 05/13/2025, 05/14/2025 & 05/16/2025), reviewed for posted nurse staffing information. The failure to post a complete and accurate form daily prevented the residents, family members, and visitors from exercising their rights to know the actual nursing staff hours worked in the facility. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, revised in August 2006, showed that Within two hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed nurses and the number of unlicensed nurses directly responsible for resident care is posted in a prominent location and in a clear and readable format .The information recorded should include the actual time worked during that shift for each category and type of nursing staff and total number of licensed and non-licensed nursing staff working for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet the needs of 4 of 6 residents (Resident 4, 30, 21 & 38), reviewed for medication management. The failure to follow physicians order and medication instruction placed the residents at risk for medication errors, negative outcomes, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised in April 2019, showed, The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. Review of the facility's policy titled, Oral Inhaler [portable device for administering a drug which is to be breathed in], revised in January 2023, showed that the facility would allow for safe, accurate, and effective administration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications with adverse side effects were adequately monitored and/or non-pharmacological interventions were provided prior to administering pain medications for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 2, 39 & 271), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, related complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medications with Boxed Warning, revised in January 2023, showed, nursing should include appropriate monitoring parameters on the resident specific care plan as appropriate. Monitoring for adverse consequences involving ongoing vigilance and may periodically involve evaluations. RESIDENT 2 Review of the February 2025 to May 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that Resident 2 had orders for oxycodone (opioid - narcotic pain medication). Further review of the MAR showed no documentation that Resident 2 was being monitored for adverse side effects related to oxycodone use and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and biologicals were discarded for 1 of 1 medication room (Medication Room) and for 2 of 2 crash carts (300 Hall & 400 Hall Crash Carts), reviewed for medication storage and labeling. In addition, the facility failed to properly store medications for 5 of 19 residents (Residents 30, 38, 34, 10 & 5). These failures placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised and/or ineffective biological and medical supplies. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications, revised in April 2020, showed that the facility stored all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. The policy further showed that discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications or biologicals would be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. Review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, revised in September 2004, showed that medications may be kept in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were properly completed for 4 of 7 residents (Residents 36, 25, 2 & 30), reviewed for resident records. The failure to fill out resident forms accurately placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . RESIDENT 36 Review of a face sheet printed on 05/13/2025 showed Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and anxiety disorder (having excessive/persistent worry and fear). Review of Resident 36's Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], Intellectual Disabilities [ID]; or related conditions are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care) dated 04/28/2025, did not show depression and anxiety disorder were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases by: 1. Not ensuring the Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) policies and procedures were reviewed annually, as required. 2. Not monitoring the expiration for eyewash station solutions for 3 of 4 eyewash stations (300 Hall Nurse's Station, 500 Hall Resident Care Manager [RCM] Office, Laundry Room), reviewed for water management. 3. Not ensuring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - precautions to protect the spread of infectious organisms) were followed for 1 of 9 residents (Residents 1). 4. Not performing hand hygiene during care and treatments for 4 of 11 residents (Residents 4, 7, 23 & 38). 5. Not appropriately handling soiled linen during transport for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 2 & 19), reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents, visitors, and staff at an increased risk of acquiring infections, related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents on urinary catheter (a semi-flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) were provided with privacy for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 30 & 8), reviewed for dignity. This failure placed the residents at risk for decreased self-worth and a diminished quality of life Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity, revised in February 2021, showed that each resident would be cared for in a manner that promoted and enhanced their sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. The document further showed that residents were to be treated with dignity and respect. Review of the facility's policy titled, [Urinary] Catheter Care, revised in August 2022, showed that the purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including bladder infections. The document further showed that catheter tubing and drainage bag were to be kept off the floor. RESIDENT 30 Observation on 05/13/2025 at 4:25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an updated guardianship letter was readily available in medical records and accessible to staff for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 29), reviewed for Advanced Directives (a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care). This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk of losing their right to have their preferences honored to receive care according to their choice. Findings included . Review of Resident 29's guardianship letter signed/dated on [DATE] showed it was effective until [DATE]. Further review showed no documentation that the facility attempted to have an updated guardianship letter in Resident 29's Electronic Health Record (EHR). In an interview and joint record review on [DATE] at 2:36 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated that if a resident had a guardianship, the facility would ask for documentation and it would be uploaded into the resident's EHR. Staff A stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-17 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC- a required form notifying the resident that their skilled services coverage was ending and would no longer be covered by their Medicare A benefits) at least two calendar days before the Medicare coverage ended for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 56), reviewed for beneficiary notification. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk for not being fully informed and losing their right to an appeals process. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, NOMNC Policy, revised on 09/12/2024, showed that A NOMNC will be issued at least 2 days, but not greater than 4 days, prior to the last covered day, to beneficiaries where it has been determined that Medicare A, B, or C covered services are no longer required. Review of Resident 56's NOMNC showed a last day of Medicare A coverage of 04/11/2025 and signed on 04/10/2025, one day before the end of Medicare A coverage. In an interview and joint record review on 05/16/2025 at 3:23 PM, Staff G,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were in place for psychotropic (drugs that affects how the brain works, and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings or behavior) medication management for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 64 & 57), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, adverse side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, revised in July 2022, showed, A psychotropic medication is any mediation that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior . non-pharmacological approaches are used (unless contraindicated) to minimize the need for medications, permit the lowest possible dose, and allow for discontinuation of medications when possible. RESIDENT 64 Review of a face sheet printed on 05/13/2025 showed Resident 64 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-17 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) was completed timely for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 2), reviewed for SCSA. This failure placed the resident at risk for delayed care planning, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.19.1, dated October 2024, showed that a SCSA is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice (compassionate care provided to individuals who are in the final stages of a terminal illness) program or changes hospice providers and remains a resident at the nursing home. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) must be within 14 days from the effective date of the hospice election. The RAI manual further showed that the assessment should be completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-17 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate the Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) for Level II services (a process to determine what mental health services residents required after a Level I PASARR determined mental health services were necessary) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 26), reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the resident at risk of not receiving the necessary mental health services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, PASRR, revised in July 2024, showed, Social services will review the completed PASRR [Level] II screening for any recommendations and will ensure that the patient [resident] receives the necessary services and that interventions are care planned . Care Planning for Level II PASRR Residents who have screened positive for Level II during the PASRR evaluation are required to have this reflected clearly in the care plan, and any recommendations made by the evaluator are to be included as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], Intellectual Disabilities [ID]; or related conditions are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care) Level I form was completed accurately and Level II PASARR referrals were made for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 36), reviewed for PASARR screening. In addition, the facility failed to complete Level I PASARR screening form for an exempted hospital discharge resident who remained in the facility for more than 30 days for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 57). These failures placed the residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services for their needs and/or lacking access to specialized services for individuals with identified mental health diagnoses or disabilities. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, PASRR Policy, revised in July 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 51 & 39), reviewed for quality of care. The failure to consistently conduct skin evaluations to include care planning, monitoring and necessary treatment for Resident 51, and the failure to consistently monitor and manage constipation (passing fewer than three stools a week or having a difficult time passing stool) for Resident 39, placed the residents and other residents at risk for unmet care needs, pain/discomfort, and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Management Guidelines, revised on 03/31/2025, showed that skin checks were completed by the Licensed nurse weekly . CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant/NAC [Nursing assistant Certified]/Shower aides will report any alterations in skin identified during routine care .If a Resident is identified to have a new skin alteration the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-17 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure podiatry (the treatment of feet and their ailments) care and services were provided for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 10), reviewed for foot care. This failure placed the resident at risk for further skin impairment, discomfort, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Foot Care, revised in October 2022, showed, Residents are provided with foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice . Residents are assisted in making appointments and with transportation to and from specialists (podiatrist) . Trained staff may provide routine foot care (e.g., toenail clipping) within professional standards of practice for residents without complicating disease processes. Review of Resident 10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 04/22/2025, showed Resident 10 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were consistently provided to increase and/or to prevent decrease Range of Motion (ROM) for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 32 & 34), reviewed for restorative services. This failure placed the residents at risk for a decline in ROM, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Restorative Services, revised on 11/11/2005, showed, It is the policy of the facility to provide its residents the restorative services in an effort to maintain the residents highest level of self-care and independence, physically and psychosocially. RESIDENT 32 Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 04/05/2025, showed Resident 32 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included cerebral palsy (a group of conditions that affect movement and posture). It further showed that Resident 32 had ROM impairment in their upper and lower extremities.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with urinary catheters (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) received appropriate care and services for 2 of 8 residents (Residents 4 & 39), reviewed for catheter care. The failure to empty urinary catheter bag and/or ensure other urinary catheter care were provided placed the residents at risk for infections, related complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, [Urinary] Catheter Care, revised in August 2022, showed that the purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including bladder infections. The document further showed that catheter tubing and drainage bag (collects urine from the catheter) were to be kept off the floor. RESIDENT 4 Review of Resident 4's admission minimum data set (an assessment tool) dated 02/03/2025, showed Resident 4 had a urinary catheter. Review of a provider note date 04/25/2025, showed that Resident 4 had informed, [that] sometimes her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-17 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident who require ostomy (a surgical procedure creating an opening in the body for the discharge of body waste into a collection bag) care received services consistent with professional standards for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 17), reviewed for ostomy care. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, skin breakdown, related complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Evaluation Guidelines for Managing Ostomy Care, revised in October 2015, showed Task completed should be documented via the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) .A physician's order should be obtained to match the required task(s) being performed. Review of the comprehensive care plan printed 05/13/2025 showed Resident 17 had a colostomy (type of ostomy). Review of Resident 17's physician orders printed on 05/13/2025 showed no orders related to colostomy. Review of Resident 17's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and/or TAR printed on 05/13/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-17 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors and diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event that was either experienced or witnessed) received trauma informed care, trigger assessment, and trauma-informed care assessment in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 48), reviewed for mood/behavior. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified triggers, re-traumatization, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Trauma Informed Care and Culturally Competent Care, revised in August 2022, showed that it was the policy of the facility to guide staff in providing care that is culturally competent and trauma-informed in accordance with professional standards of practice and to address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers (cause [an event or situation] to happen or exist)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse reporting. The facility's failure to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the state agency and to law enforcement placed Resident 1 and other residents at risk for repeated incidents and unidentified abuse. Findings included . Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition) showed, Abuse-Sexual, means any form of non-consensual conduct, including but not limited to, unwanted or inappropriate touching. It further showed that sexual contact may include interactions that do not involve touching including, but not limited to, sending sexually explicit messages, cueing, or encouraging a resident to perform sexual acts. Review of the facility's Abuse Policy titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property, dated September 2022, showed mandated (required) reporters are to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was investigated timely for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse investigations. This failure placed the residents at risk for repeated incidents, unidentified abuse, and a diminished quality of life. Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition) showed, Abuse-Sexual, means any form of non-consensual conduct, including but not limited to, unwanted or inappropriate touching. It further showed that sexual contact may include interactions that do not involve touching including, but not limited to, sending sexually explicit messages, cueing, or encouraging a resident to perform sexual acts. Review of the facility's Abuse Policy titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property, dated September 2022, showed, as soon as a report of an alleged or suspected abuse/neglect is received, the investigation shall begin to rule out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- precautions to protect residents from multidrug-resistant organism [a germ that is resistant to medications that treat infections]) signage was in place and/or use of appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-gown) were followed during medication administration for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for infection control. This failure placed the residents, staff, and visitors at an increased risk of infection and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Control, revised in July 2002, showed that the facility's infection control policies and procedures are to establish guidelines to provide a safe and sanitary environment while preventing the development and transmission of disease and infection. Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 03/21/2024, showed that PPE for EBP were necessary when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the primary care physician was notified when medications were not administered for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for medications. The failure to notify the primary care physician when the medication (Levothyroxine) used to treat an underactive thyroid gland (a gland in the neck that affects heart rate, mood, and energy levels) and a medication (Trospium) used to treat an overactive bladder was not administered placed Resident 1 at risk for a decline in medical condition, skin impairments, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 07/15/2024, showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis list that included a thyroid disorder. The MDS also showed the resident had intact thinking and had a loss of bladder control. Interview on 08/06/2024 at 3:03 PM, Resident 1 stated, I missed some days of my thyroid medication and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) was free from a significant medication error. The failure to administer a medication (Levothyroxine) used to treat an underactive thyroid gland (a gland in the neck that affects heart rate, mood, and energy levels) and a medication (Trospium) used to treat an overactive bladder placed Resident 1 at risk for a decline in medical condition, skin impairments, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 07/15/2024, showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis list that included a thyroid disorder. The MDS also showed the resident had intact thinking and had a loss of bladder control. Interview on 08/06/2024 at 3:03 PM, Resident 1 stated, I missed some days of my thyroid medication and the medication I take to control my bladder. I am afraid my heart will start to beat too fast if I don't get my thyroid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were developed within 48 hours of admission to ensure continuity of care and failed to ensure a summary or copy of the baseline care plan were provided to the residents and/or their representatives for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 1, 3 & 4), reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Baseline Care Plan, revised in March 2022, showed that a baseline plan or care to meet resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission. The policy further showed that the baseline care plan includes instructions needed to effective, person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. RESIDENT 1 Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance for shower/bathing for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 1 & 2), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, poor hygiene, skin impairment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . RESIDENT 1 Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 06/17/2024, showed Resident 1 required total assist with shower/bathing. Further review of the MDS showed Resident 1 was cognitively intact. Review of the undated document titled, Shower Schedule Wing 3, showed room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 (Resident 1's room) was scheduled for shower/bathing on Tuesdays and Fridays. Review of the June 2024 Documentation Survey Report, showed Resident 1 did not receive a shower/bathing on 06/18/2024 (Tuesday) and on 06/21/2024 (Friday). Further review of the document did not show Resident 1 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency within the required timeframe for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse allegation. This failure placed the resident at risk for potential unidentified abuse and lack of protection from abuse. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, revised in September 2022, showed, All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations). The policy further showed, If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated and/or completed/documented on the incident report log within five days for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse investigation. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified abuse and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, revised in September 2022, showed that all allegations are thoroughly investigated. The policy further showed, The individual conducting the investigation as a minimum interviews staff members (on all shifts) who had contact with the resident during the period of alleged incident, reviews all events leading up to the alleged incident and documents the investigation completely and thoroughly. Upon conclusion of the investigation, the investigator records the findings of the investigation. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise comprehensive care plans for 4 of 13 residents (Residents 4, 49, 53 & 45), reviewed for care plan revision. The failure to revise care plans for bed placed against the wall, refusal of showers, discharge planning, and involve resident in their care plan meetings, placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person - Centered, revised in March 2022, showed assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' condition change. The policy showed that the interdisciplinary team reviews and updates care plans when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition, when the desired outcome is not met, when resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay, and at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to clarify a physician's order for 1 of 8 residents (Resident 20) and failed to ensure staff documented residents' medications in accordance with professional standards for 5 of 8 residents (Residents 5, 20, 9, 361 & 52), reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed the residents at risk for medication errors and negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Oral Medications, revised in October 2010, showed their policy provided guidelines for the safe administration of oral medications. The policy further showed to check the label on the medication and confirm the medication name and dose with the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Review of the facility's policy titled, Documentation of Medication Administration, revised in November 2022, showed that administration of medication is documented immediately after it is given. A MAR is used to document all medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the posted daily nurse staffing information included the actual hours worked by registered and licensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift for 2 of 6 days reviewed for posted nurse staffing information. The failure to post a complete and accurate form daily prevented the residents, family members, and visitors from exercising their rights to know the actual nursing staff hours worked in the facility. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, revised in August 2022, showed that within two hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed nurses and the number of unlicensed nurses directly responsible for resident care is posted in a prominent location and in a clear and readable format. The information recorded should include the actual time worked during that shift for each category and type of nursing staff and total number of licensed and non-licensed nursing staff working for the posted shift. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were handled appropriately in accordance with professional standards of food safety for 3 of 4 freezers (Kitchen Freezer, Kitchen Walk-In Freezer and Downstairs Storage Freezer), 1 of 2 refrigerators (Cellarium Refrigerator), and 1 of 1 seasoning shelf (Kitchen Shelf) reviewed for food services. The failure to date and discard expired food items and/or before use by date, placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), cross contamination, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Safety and Sanitation, revised on 01/2024, showed that opened food products will be used or discarded by timeframes consistent with federal guidelines and state food rules/codes. The policy showed that if use-by guidelines exceed the printed use by/expiration date from the manufacturer, the food item/s are to be used or discarded by the printed manufacturer use by/expiration date. The policy further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a comprehensive water management program that assessed, measured, and/or monitored potential risk for exposure to Legionnaire's disease (Legionella - a potentially dangerous bacteria that grows in water, which could cause a serious lung infection) or other waterborne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganisms that can cause a disease). In addition, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene practices and/or proper use of gloves were followed during resident care for 2 of 4 staff (Staff R & S), failed to appropriately disinfect medical equipment for 3 of 4 staff (Staff S, T & J), and failed to do hand hygiene during dining meal observations for 2 of 3 staff (Staff J & M), reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents at risk for facility acquired or healthcare-associated infections and related complications. Findings included . WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Review of the facility's policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives (a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care) were obtained from the residents and/or their representatives and ensure a copy was readily available in the medical records for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 45 & 38), reviewed for advance directives. This failure placed the residents and/or their representatives at risk for losing their right to have their preferences honored to receive care according to their choice. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directives, revised in September 2022, showed, prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the resident, his/her family members and/or his or her legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directives. The policy showed that if the resident or representative indicates that he or she has not established advance directives, the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN - a required form that outlined the transfer of financial liability from the nursing facility to the Medicare [government health insurance program] beneficiary) for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 160, 30 & 161), reviewed for liability notices, who remained in the facility after their Medicare Part A skilled nursing and rehabilitation services ended. This failure placed the residents and/or their representatives at risk for not having adequate information to make financial decisions related to continued stay in the facility. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, SNF ABN, revised on 09/01/2023, showed, a SNF ABN shall be issued to qualified beneficiaries following a skilled stay when the beneficiary chooses to remain in the facility. The SNF ABN is a liability notice, and it provides information to the beneficiary so that an informed decision may be made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 1 room (room [ROOM NUMBER]), reviewed for environment. The failure to prevent excessive odor placed the resident at risk for feeling unclean, undignified, and a diminished self-worth. Findings included . Resident 47 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Electronic Health Record showed Resident 47 had been in room [ROOM NUMBER] since 10/04/2023. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 01/26/2024, showed Resident 47 was cognitively intact. On 03/12/2024 at 8:49 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] had a strong smell of urine. The strong urine odor continued through 03/13/2024 at 2:15 PM, on 03/14/2024 at 10:00 AM, on 03/14/2024 at 10:58 AM, and on 03/15/2024 at 12:23 PM. Observation and interview on 03/13/2024 at 2:15 PM, showed Resident 47 had a urinary catheter (a semi-flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) bag full of urine.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, initiate, thoroughly investigate, and promptly resolve a grievance for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 15), reviewed for grievances. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Grievance, revised in May 2000, showed, the nursing facility will listen to and act promptly upon grievances. The policy showed that Formal grievances are to be made in writing and the resident fills out the top portion of the grievance communication form and staff will assist if requested. The appropriate department supervisor will take immediate action toward resolution of the concern and will record the resolution on the bottom section of the form. The policy further showed that resolved grievances will be maintained .for one year. Resident 15 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 15's Inventory of Personal Effects document dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 1 of 6 residents (Resident 49), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to ensure accurate assessments regarding medications placed the resident at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, showed, coding instructions to code all high risk drug class medications according to their pharmacological (drug's uses, effects, and modes of actions) classification and not how they are being used. It also showed to check if the resident is taking any medication by pharmacological classification during the 7-day observation period. The Observation Period (also known as the Look-back period) is the time-period over which the resident's condition or status is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a baseline care plan for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 23), reviewed for baseline care plans. The failure to implement the baseline care plan for nutritional risk placed the resident at risk for health complications, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans-Baseline, revised in March 2022, showed, The baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. Review of the facility's policy titled, Dysphagia [difficulty swallowing foods or liquids] Diets and Aspiration [occurs when food or liquid is breathed into the airways or lungs] Precautions, dated October 2021, showed that Dysphagia diets and aspiration precautions will be individualized with modifications made by the Speech Language Pathologist [SLP - treat many types of communication and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 23), reviewed for accidents. The failure to provide necessary supervision placed the resident at risk for accidents, injury, and other negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Assistive Devices and Equipment, revised in January 2020, showed, The following factors are addressed to the extent possible to decrease the risk of avoidable accidents associated with devices and equipment . and .the resident is assessed for lower extremity strength, range of motion, balance and cognitive abilities when determining the safest use of devices and equipment. The policy further showed that staff are required to demonstrate competency on the use of devices and equipment and are available to assist and supervise as needed. Resident 23 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included cerebral palsy (a group of disorders that affect a person's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and monitor a resident weight for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 23), reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed the resident at risk for unrecognized weight loss, nutrition-related complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Nutrition and Hydration: Weight Systems and Assessment, dated October 2023, showed, The purpose of this standard is to ensure baseline weights are obtained; significant weight variance; insidious weight loss; and weight trends are identified, assessed and monitored. The policy further showed, Nursing will obtain patient [resident] weight on the first day of admission, maximum of 24 hours, for admission/readmission and weekly for four weeks thereafter. This weight will be entered into the Electronic Medical Record as the baseline weight. Resident 23 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 23's nutrition care plan revised on 03/11/2024, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain respiratory equipment to include covering the Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP - a therapy that pumps air into the lungs through the nose or nose and mouth that keeps the airway open) mask when not in use, labeling the tubing, and ensure oxygen therapy was given according to standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 23 & 26), reviewed for respiratory care. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, respiratory infections, and related complications. Findings included . RESIDENT 23 Resident 23 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included acute and chronic respiratory failure (a condition that happens when lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood). Review of Resident 23's March 2024 Treatment Administration Record showed CPAP on at HS [at bedtime] and when sleeping, started on 03/12/2024. Review of Resident 23's respiratory therapy care plan revised on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 1 of 30 days (02/25/2024), reviewed for staffing. This failure placed the residents at risk for inadequate assessments, delay in care services by an RN, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Staff, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, revised in August 2022, showed, A registered nurse provides services at least eight (8) consecutive hours every 24 hours, seven (7) days a week. Review of the facility's form titled, Daily Nursing Staff, dated 02/25/2024, showed no RN coverage for all shifts. Review of the daily nurse schedule for 02/25/2024 showed that Staff D, Registered Nurse, worked as the Resident Care Manager for five and one-half hours (not the required eight hours). No other RNs worked on that day. In an interview and joint record review on 03/19/2024 at 12:59 PM with Staff B, Director of Nursing, stated that we have a lot [of RNs] on staff when asked what the facility did if there was not an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). The failure to properly administer 9 of 53 medications for 2 of 8 residents (Residents 20 & 52), observed during medication pass resulted in a medication error rate of 16.98%. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving the correct dose or receiving less than the intended therapeutic effects of physician ordered medications and possible adverse effects. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Oral Medications, revised in October 2010, showed their policy provided guidelines for the safe administration of oral medications. It further showed to check the label on the medication, confirm the medication name and dose with the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications through an Enteral Tube [medical device used to provide nutrition directly into the stomach or small…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately label and store drugs and/or biologicals (diverse group of medicines made from natural sources) for 1 of 2 medication carts (Wing 1 Medication Cart), reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the resident at risk for receiving compromised and ineffective medications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, revised in February 2023, showed that multi-dose (more than one dose) vials (small glass container for holding liquid medicine) that have been opened or accessed are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Joint observation and interview on 03/14/2024 at 11:36 AM with Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse, showed the Wing 1 Medication Cart had one opened and undated multi-dose vial of Novolin R insulin (a type of insulin - medication that works by lowering levels of sugar in the blood) for Resident 34. Staff K stated Resident 34's insulin vial should have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident 26) reviewed for dental services was provided timely referral to a dentist and reimbursement for missing dentures. In addition, the facility failed to have a policy that identified when the loss of dentures was the facility's responsibility. These failures placed the resident at risk for difficulty chewing, oral pain, decreased self-image, financial burden, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Lost Item Policy, revised in September 2004, showed, It is the policy of this facility to protect residents' items from theft or loss to the extent possible. Every effort will be made to insure against theft or loss, to recapture lost items, or to make restitution should a lost item not be recovered. Resident 26 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a facility form titled, Inventory of Personal Effects, dated 12/09/2021, showed Resident 26's upper partial dentures and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explain the arbitration (a procedure used to settle a dispute using an independent person mutually agreed upon by both parties) agreement in a manner that the resident and/or representative understood for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 52), reviewed for arbitration agreement. This failure placed the resident at risk of losing legal protections, forfeiture (loss or giving up of something) of the right to a jury or court, lack of understanding of the legal document signed, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Arbitration Agreement, dated 01/04/2021, showed the admission coordinator would review the arbitration agreement with the admission and obtain signature for agreement or decline. Review of a facility document titled, Patient [resident] and Facility Arbitration Agreement, showed that Resident 52's Representative (RR1) signed the arbitration agreement on 11/28/2023. On 03/18/2024 at 12:31 PM, RR1, stated they did not remember signing an arbitration agreement. RR1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives received information on the current recommendations from the Center for Disease and Control (CDC) Prevention for 2 of 8 residents (Residents 52 & 4) related to pneumococcal vaccinations (vaccines used to prevent pneumonia [lung infection]). This failure placed the residents at risk for acquiring, transmitting and/or experience potentially avoidable complications from pneumonia. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised in March 2022, showed All residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections . Prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, are offered the vaccine series within thirty (30) days of admission . The policy showed that before the resident received the vaccine the resident or legal representative would receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated and/or logged and completed timely within five days for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 3, 4 & 5), reviewed for abuse investigations. This failure placed the residents at risk for repeated incidents, unidentified abuse, and inappropriate corrective actions. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, revised in September 2022, showed that any employee who has been accused of resident abuse is placed on leave with no resident contact until the investigation is complete. INCIDENT INVESTIGATION RESIDENT 3 Resident 3 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the facility's investigation summary report titled, Alleged Abuse, dated 01/22/2024, showed Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant, made Resident 3 cry and made them feel bad for soiling their bed. Further review of the investigation showed Staff B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the abuse allegation was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse investigations. This failure placed the resident at risk for repeated incidents, unrecognized abuse, and inappropriate corrective actions. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, revised in September 2022, showed that all allegations are thoroughly investigated. The individual conducting the investigation as a minimum interviews staff members (on all shifts) who had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident, interviews other residents to whom the accused employee provides care or services, documents the investigation completely and thoroughly. Upon conclusion of the investigation, the investigator records the findings of the investigation. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu met the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with the established national guidelines for well-balanced diet/menu. This failure placed the residents at risk for not having their food choices honored, unmet nutritional needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Menu Planning indicated the Nutritional needs of individuals [residents] will be provided in accordance with the recommended dietary allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences . through nourishing, well-balanced diets, unless contraindicated by medical needs . Menus are written using an accepted, standard meal planning guide, such as the USDA [United States Department of Agriculture] MyPyramid. Review of the USDA Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2020-2025 [This was retrieved on 12/25/2022] indicated, Calorie Level: 1800: Vegetables: 2 1/2 cups/day; Fruits: 1 1/2 cups/day; Dairy: 3 cups/day; Protein…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-22 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completely timely as required for 5 of 21 residents (Residents 3, 22, 30, 10 & 35) reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility's failure to conduct annual comprehensive assessments placed the residents at risk of unidentified physical, psychological, functional changes, other unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, October 2019 edition, revealed the facility is to conduct a comprehensive assessment no more than 366 days from the previous comprehensive assessment. RESIDENT 3 Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 08/13/2013 for Resident 3. Review of the MDS list of activity for Resident 3, revealed an annual comprehensive assessment was last completed on 12/20/2021, more than one year ago. RESIDENT 22 Review of the EMR revealed an admission date of 11/14/2021 for Resident 22. Review of the MDS list of activity for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-22 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were conducted timely for 11 of 21 residents (Residents 27, 66, 13, 39, 24, 46, 36, 14, 23, 12 and 37) reviewed for Quarterly MDS Assessments. This failure placed the residents at risk for delayed and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the ''Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] Manual,'' October 2019 edition, used by the facility to direct the type of assessment needed and instructions of how to complete the assessment, indicated that a quarterly assessment was to be completed at least every 92 days when a comprehensive assessment was not required. RESIDENT 27 Review of Resident 27's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Census tab revealed an admission date of 04/05/2021. Review of the MDS tab, revealed Resident 27's last assessment was a comprehensive MDS assessment completed on 07/05/2022. The facility failed to perform a quarterly assessment within 92 days. RESIDENT 66 Review of Resident 66's EMR revealed an admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 6 of 6 residents (Residents 14, 42, 374, 35, 40 and 15) reviewed for palatability. This failure placed the residents at risk for weight change, less than adequate nutritional intake, and dissatisfaction with meals. Findings included . Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Food Temperatures indicated All hot food items must be cooked to appropriate internal temperatures, held and served at a temperature of at least 135 degrees F [Fahrenheit] . Temperatures should be taken periodically to ensure hot foods stay above 135 degrees F and cold foods stay below 41 degrees F during the portioning, transporting and serving process until received by the resident. Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Dietary Services- Food and Drink indicated The facility will provide to each resident: Food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance; Food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a water management program to reduce the potential for exposure to opportunistic waterborne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganisms that can cause a disease) including Legionnaire's disease, a potentially dangerous bacteria that grows in water, which could cause a serious lung infection (Pneumonia). This failure created a potential risk for the facility residents to be exposed to Legionella, other opportunistic water-borne pathogens, and related complications. Findings included . Review of the website for American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers titled, Risk Management for Legionellosis, dated 10/15, indicated . The design engineer first needs to evaluate which requirements of the standard apply to their project. This evaluation determines if the project contains any of the following building risk factors . Health-care facility with patient stays over 24 hours .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide hot water to the sink in the room of 1 of 47 residents (Resident 42) reviewed for accommodation of needs. The failure to have hot water and weak water pressure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility did not have a policy to address water temperatures in the resident rooms. Review of Resident 42's Face Sheet revealed Resident 42 was admitted to the facility originally on 09/10/2022. The resident's diagnoses included encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation. Review of Resident 42's admission Minimum Data Set with an assessment reference date of 09/17/2022 revealed Resident 42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Observation on 12/19/2022 at 10:07 AM, revealed Resident 42 was seated on his bed in his room. During this meeting, Resident 42 said the hot water in his room never got hot and stated, It is not hot enough to wash your face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect or mistreatment that did not result in bodily harm, no later than 24 hours after the allegation was reported for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 66) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed the resident at risk for neglect, mistreatment, and unreported allegations. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, ''Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure,'' dated 07/05/2022, showed, 5. This facility will report all alleged violations to the State Agency and to other agencies as required.'' Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident 66 under the Census tab, revealed an admission date of 08/09/2022, and a diagnosis that included anxiety. Review of the EMR under the Care Plan tab revealed an undated ''Behavior Care Plan for Aggressive Behavior (Verbal/Physical) Template,'' which indicated Resident 66 was irritable, verbally threatening and makes false accusations related to medical issues and psychological issues ''(such as dementia [memory loss], depression and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of neglect or mistreatment for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 66) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed the resident at risk for unrecognized abuse or neglect, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, ''Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure'' dated 07/05/2022, stated, ''All resident events reported . will be investigated to determine if abuse has occurred .'' The Procedure section ''3. Any alleged . abuse will be reported to the Administrator and Director of Nursing as soon as possible .'' The Procedure continues ''4. All investigations will include a statement form staff involved as well as from the resident.'' The policy directs that the residents will be protected during the investigation. Review of Resident 66's the Electronic Medical Record, under the census tab revealed an admission date of 08/09/2022, and a diagnosis that included anxiety. Review of the Care Plan revealed an undated ''Behavior Care Plan for Aggressive Behavior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review, the facility failed to consistently complete and/or transmit resident assessment data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) within the required timeframes for 3 of 21 residents (Residents 27, 12 & 10) reviewed for timeliness in submitting Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and/or completing and transmitting death in facility tracking record. These failures placed the residents at risk for inaccurate/incomplete assessments, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the ''Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] Manual,'' October 2019 edition, used by the facility to direct the type of assessment needed and instructions of how to complete the assessment, indicated on page 2-32 revealed, The MDS must be transmitted (submitted and accepted into the QIES [Quality Improvement and Evaluation System] ASAP [Assessment Submission and Processing] system) electronically no later than 14 calendar days after the MDS completion date (Z0500B + 14 calendar days). Page 2-36 of the RAI Manual also showed, Death in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 3) with a tracheostomy stoma (an artificial opening in the neck for breathing and respiratory secretions). This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of Resident 3's Electronic Medical Record under the Census tab revealed Resident 3's admission date was 08/13/2013. Resident 3's diagnoses included diabetes (a disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), sleep apnea (potentially serious sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts), and a tracheostomy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed tracheostomy was coded/marked on the MDS. Review of the care plan revealed no goals or interventions for the care of Resident 3's tracheostomy stoma. Review of Orders revealed there were no orders for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight, for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 15) reviewed for nutritional status. The facility's failure to ensure Resident 15 received the appropriate diet texture and assess for needed changes in interventions resulted in significant weight loss. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Nutrition and Hydration Monitoring updated on 05/17/2021 indicated the Facility will attempt non-drug interventions to address weight loss which may include but not limited to: a. Enhanced calorie intake based on RD [Registered Dietitian] recommendation b. Assess and modify diet and assistance received c. Assess for any special utensils, texture modification, cut-up, feeding assistance d. Offer pudding, cottage cheese, ice cream, milk shakes per RD recommendations . All nutritionally at-risk resident weights will be tracked and monitored weekly, until weight is stable,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the risks and benefits of side rails were completed and that the side rails were regularly evaluated for safety for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 11) who had two, one-fourth siderails on their bed. This failure placed the resident at risk for entrapment and/or injury. Finding included . Observation and interview on 12/20/2022 at 8:41 AM, Resident 11 was in bed with 2 upper 1/4 bed rails in the raised position. Interview revealed Resident 11 was unable to reposition with the side rails and required assistance from the staff. Review of Resident 11's significant change Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident 11 required extensive assistance from two staff for bed mobility. Review of the Electronic Medical Record revealed no evidence of a side rail assessment for Resident 11 that indicated Resident 11 used the rails as an enabler to assist in repositioning. An interview on 12/22/2022 at 3:37 PM, the Administrator (Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services for 1 of 47 residents (Resident 41) reviewed for mental health provision and services. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet psycho-social needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Behavioral Health Services, updated on 07/07/2022, revealed Policy statement: Each resident must receive, and the facility must provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Behavioral health encompasses a resident's whole emotional and mental well-being, which includes but is not limited to, the prevention and treatment of mental and substance use disorders. Review of Resident 41's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under Face Sheet revealed that Resident 41 was admitted to the facility originally on 10/20/2022 with diagnosis that included depression. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper diet texture consistency for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 374) reviewed for nutrition and specialty diet. This failure placed the resident at risk for nutritional imbalance, weight changes and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the undated facility's diet manual titled, Dysphagia [difficulty swallowing] Mechanically Altered (Level 2) Diet indicated Meat or meat alternative: Ground as tolerated, moistened with sauce or gravy; Vegetables: Cooked, tender, chopped, or shredded; Grains: Pureed or slurried and gelled; well cooked noodles, soft pancakes well moistened with syrup or sauce. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Dietary Services-Food and Drink indicated The facility will provide to each resident: Food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Menu Planning indicated Regular and therapeutic menus are written by the facility's food and nutritional professional in accordance with the facility's approved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ready-to-eat food was handled appropriately in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 dining room. This failure placed the resident at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included . Review of the undated facility's policy titled, General Food Preparation and Handling indicated Bare hands should never touch raw food directly . Food will be prepared and served with clean tongs, scoops, forks, spoons, spatulas, or other suitable implements to avoid manual contact of prepared foods. Observation in the dining room on 12/20/2022 at 7:47 AM, the Nurse Aide (Staff I) was observed putting butter and jelly on Resident 5's bread. Staff I picked up the resident's bread with her bare hands. An interview on 12/20/2022 at 8:40 AM, Staff I acknowledged she handled the resident's bread with her bare hands. She said she had been previously educated on the proper handling of ready-to-eat food. An interview on 12/22/2022 at 3:32 PM, the Director of Nursing (Staff B) confirmed Staff I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review of room size measurements, seven single resident rooms (Rooms 405, 407, 501, 503, 505, 507 & 509) failed to meet the minimum room size requirement of at least 100 square feet (sq ft) for a single resident room. The failure to ensure residents reside in rooms which met the regulatory requirements for square footage, placed them at risk for living in a physical environment too small to meet their needs. Findings included . Square footage: -room [ROOM NUMBER]- 85 sq ft -room [ROOM NUMBER]- 95 sq ft -room [ROOM NUMBER]- 83 sq ft -room [ROOM NUMBER]- 87 sq ft -room [ROOM NUMBER]- 87 sq ft -room [ROOM NUMBER]- 87 sq ft -room [ROOM NUMBER]- 87 sq ft Review of the facility's census dated 03/12/2024 showed Rooms 405, 407, 501 and 507 were occupied with residents. RESIDENT 27 Resident 27 admitted to the facility on [DATE] in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 03/19/2024 at 12:13 PM, Resident 27 stated that their room was a little bit crowded and sometimes it was hard to move around in their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of room size measurements, seven single resident rooms failed to meet the minimum room size requirement of at least 100 square feet for single resident room. These rooms were: 405, 407, 501, 503, 505, 507 and 509. Findings included . Square footage: room [ROOM NUMBER] - 85 square feet room [ROOM NUMBER] - 95 square feet room [ROOM NUMBER] - 83 square feet room [ROOM NUMBER] - 87 square feet room [ROOM NUMBER] - 87 square feet room [ROOM NUMBER] - 87 square feet room [ROOM NUMBER] - 87 square feet The residents in these rooms were screened during the survey and were not found to be negatively impacted by their room size. room [ROOM NUMBER] and 501 were not occupied by a resident during the survey. On 12/22/2022 at 1:19 PM, Staff E, Plant Manager, said that there was no change made to these rooms' square footage since the last recertification survey. On 12/22/2022 at 3:21 PM, Staff A, Administrator, confirmed there was no change made to these rooms' square footage since…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVAMERE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARISO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/01/2023 |
| ARI OPERATIONS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/01/2023 |
| AVAMERE GROUP LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/01/2023 |
| KARL RICKARD MILLER JR REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/01/2023 |
| MILLER, KARL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/01/2023 |
| MIDCAP FINCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2023 |
| CAVALLO, GLEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 06/01/2025 |
| FEAKIN, CODY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| FUNDERBERG, MICHELLE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| HILL, KEVIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/12/2022 |
| HOSKINS, TONIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| INSKEEP, TODD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2022 |
| KOFSTAD, MARY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/13/2024 |
| MELCHER, ROBB | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2025 |
| OKOLI, IKE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 06/01/2025 |
| POWELSON, MICHELE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/25/2015 |
| REID, MISTY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2025 |
| SANDERS, AMANDA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 06/01/2025 |
| SIMPSON, ANDREW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| STAPLES, CAROLYN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| STRUNK, COLBY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| VANDERZANDEN, CARRIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2025 |
| AVAMERE HEALTH SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| AVAMERE SKILLED ADVISORS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| CHU, CALEB | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2022 |
| FANUNAL, LORIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2023 |
| FOWLER, KATHERINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| MANN, HARPREET | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/25/2025 |
| MANNETTI, KIMBERLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2023 |
| NANSUBUGA, VIVIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| PRESLEY, YOLANDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/06/2025 |
| CONSOLIDATED BILLING SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| INCOVATE SOLUTIONS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| MOSS ADAMS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| PACIFIC MEDICAL SPECIALTY GROUP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2023 |
| RANDE HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| SABRA HEALTH CARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| SABRA HEALTH CARE REIT INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| SABRA HEALTH CARE, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| SNAPMEDTECH,INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/08/2025 |
| GAMES, KIM | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/15/2024 |
| GRIFFITH, JOSHUA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2024 |
| KIM, JUN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/13/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 72 rows in the source record cover these 43 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $656K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505009. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.