No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avamere Transitional Care At Sunnyside

4515 Sunnyside Road SE, Salem, OR 97302 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 88 certified beds · (503) 370-8284 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (503) 370-8284 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Sep 2023Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Sep 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4285 Commercial St SE · (503) 585-6455 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4380 Commercial St SE · (503) 399-8148 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4575 Commercial St SE · (503) 362-2620 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
525 Idylwood Dr SE · (503) 910-0532

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.2%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.8%2.0%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.4%4.9%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.4%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.0%20.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.4%12.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.5%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.5%5.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.6%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.5%13.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.5%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine63.2%81.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.1%21.4%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.3%16.1%12.0%worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.8%CMS range 42.9–72.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.0–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
1.28
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.50
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.22
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
42.1%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 74.8 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.40 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-06)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-06 · tag F0659 — pattern
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure qualified staff administered medications for one of one facility reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for receiving medication errors. Findings included: The Oregon State Board of Nursing indicated the title abbreviation CMA is protected by Oregon law and means Certified Medication Aide, not Certified Medical Assistant. The abbreviation CMA could not be used by medical assistants in Oregon. Medical assistants are unregulated personnel and work in outpatient settings under the direction of a physician. The facility's Administering Medications policy, dated 4/2019, indicated only persons licensed or permitted by the state could prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications. A public complaint was received on 3/15/25, which alleged the facility failed to ensure staff were qualified to administer medications to residents. On 6/3/25 at 11:36 AM, Staff 20 (Staffing Coordinator) stated she posted on an agency website the facility needed CMAs to pass…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure narcotic drug records were in order, and an account of all controlled drugs was maintained for 4 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for drug diversion. Findings included: On 6/4/25 at 11:14 AM, book four on the South hall's 5/2025 medication cart Narcotic log book revealed 57 times out of 186 counting opportunities the facility staff did not sign verification the narcotic count was accurate. On 6/4/25 at 11:30 AM, book four on the South hall's 4/2025 medication cart Narcotic log book revealed 45 times out of 180 counting opportunities the facility staff did not sign verification the narcotic count was accurate. On 6/4/25 at 11:45 AM, book seven on the North hall's 3/2025 medication cart Narcotic log book revealed 92 times out of 186 counting opportunities the facility staff did not sign verification the narcotic count was accurate. On 6/4/25 at 11:50 AM, book seven on the North hall's 4/2025 medication cart Narcotic log book revealed 82 times…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were able to be fully informed in language that she/he can understand of her/his health status and participate in health care decisions for 1 of 7 sampled residents (#39). This placed residents at risk for not being able to fully participate in their own health care. Findings include: Resident 39 was admitted to the facility in 8/2022 with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of Resident 39's care plan initiated in 9/2022 revealed the resident was Spanish-speaking and stated translation services would be available to her/him. On 6/3/25 at 2:02 PM, Resident 39 stated some staff did not take the time to understand her/him and were impatient when she/he tried to communicate her/his needs. On 6/4/25 at 10:15 AM, Staff 5 (LPN) stated on the morning of 6/4/25 Staff 5 observed Staff 6 (CNA) tell Resident 39 to stop talking while he was attempting to take Resident 39's blood pressure. Staff 5 stated Resident 39 was trying to explain she/he wanted her/his blood pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a written grievance resolution or communication with a resident regarding the resolution of a resident's grievance for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#69) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for unaddressed concerns and grievances. Findings include: Resident 69 was admitted to the facility in 5/2025 with diagnoses including chronic pain and PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). Resident 69's 5/24/25 admission MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The facilities Grievance Policy dated 1/1/17 indicated concerns will be forwarded to the grievance official and appropriate department supervisor for action. The grievance official or department supervisor will contact the concerned resident or representative to inform them of the resolution of their concern. The grievance official and administrator will review the grievance and then forward a copy to the appropriate department manager for action within 72 hours of the receipt. The grievance official and appropriate department…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with a written bed hold notification, including reserved bed hold payment, at the time of transfer to the hospital for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#18) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their choices and potential financial responsibilities. Findings include: A review of the facility's Bed Holds and Returns Policy dated 10/2022 stated residents, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice about these policies [.] at the time of transfer. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 11/2017 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and respiratory failure. A review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed she/he was transferred to the hospital on 5/27/25. No evidence was found in Resident 18's clinical record to indicate written notice of the facility's bed hold policy was provided to the resident or her/his representative when she/he was transferred to the hospital. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services under physician orders for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#47) reviewed for respiratory services. This placed residents at risk for unmet respiratory needs. Findings include: Resident 47 was admitted to the facility in 8/2024 with diagnoses including COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease an airway disease which restricts breathing) and diabetes. The undated facility Oxygen Administration policy and procedures revealed: 1. Verify a physician's order for the procedure. Review the physicians' orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. 2. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. The 12/24/24 care plan indicated Resident 47 experienced shortness of breath with decreased energy and fatigue. Interventions included learning signs of respiratory compromise, encouraging sustained deep breaths, and monitoring and documenting changes in orientation, increased restlessness, anxiety, and air hunger. Resident 47 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate pain management for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#55) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at risk for uncontrolled pain. Findings include: Resident 55 was admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis of the hip and knee and chronic pain. A 4/16/25 Physician's Progress Note indicated Resident 55 experienced severe osteoarthritis. The recommendation was to continue pain management with PRN acetaminophen. A revised 4/17/25 care plan revealed Resident 55 experienced chronic pain due to gout, and bilateral severe osteoarthritis of the hip. Interventions included attempting non-pharmaceutical interventions before administering pain medications per physician orders and report to the nurse complaints of pain or requests for pain treatment. Resident 55's 5/21/25 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 55 received scheduled pain medication and no PRN pain medications. Resident 55 was in almost constant pain, which affected sleep, day-to-day activities,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient supplies were available to ensure a functional and comfortable environment for one of two floors reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for an uncomfortable living environment. Findings include: A public complaint received on 2/13/25 indicated the facility failed to provide enough supplies to meet resident care needs. On 6/5/25 at 9:24 AM, Staff 21 (CNA) reported since 2/2025 the facility experienced on-going shortages of bariatric sheets and towels for residents. As a result, residents often waited for clean linens before staff could change their beds. Staff 21 stated she reported these concerns to management however the issues continued to occur. On 6/5/25 at 9:25 AM, Staff 21 confirmed no bariatric sheets or towels were available for resident use in the North Hall linen closet. On 6/5/25 at 9:45 AM, Staff 29 (CNA) stated she looked for towels for a resident and was unable to find any in the North Hall linen closet. She further stated this was a common occurrence and she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure residents attained or maintained their highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being for 4 of 7 sampled residents (#s 1, 2, 3, and 13) and 2 of 2 floors reviewed for call light wait times and staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of ADL care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2015 with diagnoses including diabetes, and renal disease. A care plan dated 9/5/23, and revised on 12/5/24, revealed Resident 1 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident 1 required one or two-person assistance for all ADL care needs and required a mechanical lift for transfers. On 12/27/24 at 1:30 PM, Witness 20 (Complainant) stated Resident 1 had concerns regarding long call light response times, which were 30 minutes or longer. Witness 20 stated the resident called him on multiple occasions when she/he was sitting in a wet and soiled brief. Witness 20 stated ongoing concerns with staffing and long call light response times…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to accommodate residents with the correct fit of incontinence briefs for 4 of 13 sampled residents (#s 1, 6, 13 and 15) reviewed for dignity and respect and accommodation of need. This placed residents at risk skin breakdown and discomfort. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2015 with diagnoses including diabetes and renal disease. A care plan dated 9/5/23, and revised on 12/5/24, revealed Resident 1 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and used a brief with tabs, size three extra-large. Staff were to ensure the brief tabs were secure, so they did not scratch the skin, and use barrier cream between skin if tab contact was anticipated. Resident 1 required two-person assistance for bed mobility and one or two-person assistance for a brief change. On 12/27/24 at 1:30 PM, Witness 20 (Complainant) stated Resident 1 was recently switched to a different brief size for incontinence care, and the brief was too small, was tight, and caused red marks on the resident's skin.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to a dignified existence for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 3 and 15) reviewed for dignity and respect. This placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including morbid obesity and depression. A care plan dated 2/1/20, revealed Resident 3 was independent with transferring herself/himself in the room, utilized a bed side commode, and required one-person assistance with toileting hygiene. A Grievance Communication Form Dated 9/30/24, revealed the following: - Resident 3 turned on the call light for help at 12:15 PM. At 12:30 PM, Resident 3 placed herself/himself on the beside commode. At 1:15 PM, her/his roommate went out and asked staff for help. At 1:20 PM, almost one hour after the resident turned on the call light, a CNA entered the room and helped Resident 3 off the bedside commode. -Staff 41 (Former CNA) stated Resident 3 indicated her/his call light was on for 45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician regarding a change in condition for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for lack of physician involvement. Findings include: The facility's Change in a Resident's Condition or Status Policy Statement dated 2/2021 directed the nurse to notify the resident's attending physician or the on-call physician of a significant change in the resident's physical condition. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should) and a below the knee amputation. Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed the following: - On 10/27/24 Resident 5 had a 4.9 pound weight gain in 24 hours. No evidence was found to indicate the physician was notified. - On 10/29/24 Resident 5 had a 10.2 pound weight gain in the past seven days. No evidence was found to indicate the physician was notified. - On 11/1 Resident 5 had a 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents food preferences were honored for 1 of 3 sampled resident (#3) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for food lessened quality of life. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including morbid obesity and diabetes. A 12/27/24 meal ticket revealed Resident 3 ordered barbecue country ribs, scalloped potatoes, mixed vegetables, fruit salad, two strawberry kiwi juices and two diet lemon sodas. On 12/27/24 at 12:21 PM, Resident 3 was observed eating lunch in her/his room and the meal consisted of barbecue country ribs, scalloped potatoes, and mixed vegetables. The resident received one strawberry kiwi juice and one diet lemon lime soda. There was only one beverage each and no fruit salad delivered with the meal. On 12/27/24 at 12:25 PM, Resident 3 stated she/he did not receive what she/he requested which occurred often. Staff 12 (CNA) was present and acknowledged the resident did not receive what she/he requested, and which was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to store and handle food in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 facility kitchen reviewed for sanitary food storage and handling. This placed residents at risk for food-borne illness and contamination. Findings include: 1. On 1/22/24 at 9:23 AM during the initial tour of the main kitchen, the following was observed regarding refrigerator two: -One plastic carton of moldy strawberries. -One container with a lid of sliced lemon wedges with no date. -One bag of sliced bread with a date, but not sealed. On 1/22/24 at 9:27 AM Staff 13 (Dietary Manager) confirmed the identified items were not appropriately stored. 2. On 1/24/24 at 11:31 AM Staff 24 (Cook/Dietary Aide) was observed to pick up a hamburger bun with ungloved hands and place it on the plate. She was observed to place a hamburger patty on the bun with tongs and then proceeded to move aside the hamburger bun with ungloved hands. The surveyor stopped Staff 24 and questioned why she was not wearing gloves. Staff 24 stated she forgot to put a pair on. Staff 13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to promptly respond to grievances and recommendations from the resident council for 4 of 4 months reviewed and ensure clothing and missing personal property were addressed timely for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 53 and 56) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for unresolved quality of life and care issues. Findings include: 1. The 6/2004 Grievance Policy indicated the Activities Director or designee was to complete a grievance form when a global issue was raised at a resident council meeting. The form was to be given to the appropriate department head for follow up and departments were to respond within five days. During a resident group meeting on 1/24/24 at 1:30 PM residents stated facility staff did not consistently respond to suggestions timely or concerns offered by the resident council. Residents indicated they did not feel staff communicated with them effectively and did not feel fully informed of the actions taken in response to their concerns. Resident Council Minutes from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident care needs for 4 of 4 halls reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for delayed and unmet care needs. Findings include: On 1/25/24 the facility provided lists of residents who: -Required assistance with eating: 5 -Required assistance with dressing: 49 -Required assistance with bathing: 58 -Required assistance with toileting: 52 -Required two-person assistance with transfers: 10 -Required mechanical lift transfers: 21 -Required incontinence care: 32 -Had wandering behaviors: 4 -Had behavioral healthcare needs: 18 Resident Council Notes were reviewed and indicated the following: 9/2023: call light response times were up to one hour and there were not enough staff to give showers. A lot of CNAs turned off call lights and stated they would be back, but never returned. 10/2023: Call light response times were still too long, staff indicated they would be back in a minute and never came back. 11/2023: Call light response was still an issue.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate medication storage temperatures were logged and maintained for 2 of 2 medication storage refrigerators reviewed for safe medication storage. This placed residents at risk for receiving medications with reduced efficacy. Findings include: 1. On 1/24/24 at 12:48 PM the medication refrigerator on the 200 hall was observed with Staff 27 (RN). Review of the refrigerator temperature log indicated temperatures were to be maintained between 36 to 46 degrees. The Logs from 1/1/24 through 1/24/24 revealed 20 instances with no temperatures logged. The medication refrigerator contained tuburculin (used for testing and diagnoses of Tuburculosis) and influenza vaccines (vaccines which require refrigeration). On 1/24/24 at 1:20 PM Staff 2 (Interim DNS) stated the medication refrigerator was to be checked twice a day (AM/PM). Staff 2 further stated there was not to be any holes in the temperature logs especially with vaccines in the medication refrigerators. 2. On 1/24/24 at 1:16 PM the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to a dignified existence and self-determination for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#56) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Resident 56 was admitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses including diabetes and end stage kidney disease. On 1/24/24 at 11:50 AM Resident 56 was observed in her/his wheelchair in the hallway talking to Resident 11. Both residents decided to eat lunch together and Resident 56 moved her/his bedside table next to Resident 11's door. Resident 11 received her/his lunch at 11:53 AM and started eating, but Resident 56's meal did not arrive. Resident 56 stated I never get my meals with the other residents. At 12:00 PM Resident 56 asked Staff 9 (CNA) and Staff 14 (LPN) about her/his lunch and stated I did not get my breakfast this morning either. Staff 9 told Resident 56 the kitchen lost her/his meal slip and asked Resident 56 what she/he wanted for lunch. Resident 56 requested a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report results of abuse investigations to the State Survey Agency within the required time frame for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 34 and 49) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: A 9/18/23 FRI for abuse involving a verbal abuse altercation when Resident 13 yelled at Resident 34 and Resident 49. The investigation was completed and submitted to the State Agency on 9/26/23 (three days late). On 1/25/24 at 1:59 PM Staff 2 (Interim DNS) acknowledged the facility investigation was not reported to the State Survey Agency within five working days.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide bowel medications as ordered for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#16) reviewed for bowel care. This placed residents at risk for constipation. Findings include: The facility 10/2020 Bowel Care Protocol indicated the following: -If a resident has not had a bowel movement for three consecutive days, then evening shift was to run a report for residents who did not have a bowel movement. -Day shift was to administer milk of magnesia and if no results, then evening shift was to administer a suppository, if no results then, night shift was to administer a Fleets enema. Resident 16 admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including dementia. The 12/21/23 physician orders indicated Resident 16 was to receive a bisacodyl suppository every 24 hours PRN for constipation. Resident 16's 12/2023 and 1/2024 bowel records indicated the following days with no bowel movement: -12/29/23 -12/30/23 -12/31/23 -1/1/24 -1/2/24 -1/3/24 (Six days without a bowel movement) -1/8/24 -1/9/24 -1/10/24 -1/11/24 (Four days without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to address recommendations to promote wound healing for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#37) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for delayed healing and worsening of wounds. Findings include: The facility's 8/2020 Wound Management Policy and Guidelines indicated after the initial referral was sent to the Registered Dietitian, facility staff were to follow up on recommendations provided by the Registered Dietitian. Resident 37 admitted to the facility in 9/2020 with diagnoses including dementia and diabetes. The 9/6/23 Annual MDS indicated Resident 37 was at risk for pressure ulcer development. The resident's care plan for pressure ulcers, last updated 1/15/24, indicated the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers due to decreased mobility, incontinence of bowel, and comorbidities including diabetes. A 1/15/24 Progress Note indicated the resident was found to have two open areas on her/his coccyx (tail bone). 1/16/24 and 1/23/24 wound provider notes indicated the resident was assessed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to put services in place to eliminate the risk of elopement for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#48) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for elopement from the facility. Findings include: Resident 48 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing problems). A review of Resident 48's progress notes revealed Resident 48 had two prior elopement incidents at the facility on 8/26/22 and 8/27/23. On 9/1/23 Resident 48 received a new diagnosis of vascular dementia. A 9/4/23 Smoking Safety Evaluation revealed Resident 48 was independent to smoke and went to the designated smoking area outside. A FRI submitted on 9/11/23 revealed on 9/10/23 at 2:56 PM Resident 48 eloped from the facility from the smoking area at the back of the building. Resident 48 was located approximately 45 minutes later at a grocery store parking lot adjacent to the facility by Staff 16 (LPN RCM). Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders related to an ileostomy were followed and implemented for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#53) reviewed for ostomy care. This placed residents at risk for skin breakdown. Findings include: Resident 53 was admitted to the facility in 4/2023 with diagnoses including the presence of an Ileostomy (an artificial opening on the abdominal wall through which waste material passes out of the body from the bowel). Resident 53's 11/21/23 Care Plan indicated the resident was at risk for a potential infection related to an open wound on her/his abdomen, fistula and ileostomy status. Resident 53's Bowel Documentation records from 12/1/23 through 1/25/24 indicated the resident had output from her/his ileostomy which was loose or a diarrhea consistency. The Physician Order Summary as of 1/26/24 included the following order: - Change midline pouch, ileostomy pouch, and mucous fistula (attaches part of the intestine to a surgically created opening on the abdomen) dressing twice a week. -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was properly maintained for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#265) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for respiratory complications. Findings include: Resident 265 admitted to the facility in 1/2024 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease. Observations from 1/22/24 through 1/25/24 revealed Resident 265 used an oxygen concentrator (generates medical-grade oxygen from surrounding air) through a nasal cannula (tubing with two prongs placed in nostrils). Resident 265's 1/2024 TAR indicated: - Oxygen one to four liters via nasal cannula PRN for comfort or shortness of breath. - Oxygen concentrator filters were to be changed or cleaned every four weeks for oxygen maintenance. - Change and date the oxygen nasal cannula tubing once weekly. Observations of the oxygen concentrator and oxygen tubing from 1/22/24 through 1/25/24 revealed: - the oxygen concentrator had a built-up layer of dust on the machine. - the two external filters on the oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for medication administration. The facility's medication error rate was 6.67%. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include: Resident 14 admitted to the facility in 4/2023 with diagnoses including respiratory failure and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Resident 14's 1/2024 physician orders included the following orders: - Advair Diskus (an inhaled combination medication to treat COPD) one puff two times a day; rinse mouth after every application. - Incruse Ellipta (an inhaled medication to treat COPD) one puff once a day; rinse mouth after every application. Advair Diskus manufacturer instructions indicated the user was to rinse their mouth with water without swallowing following inhalation to help reduce the risk of thrush (fungal infection in the mouth). On 1/24/24 at 7:05 AM Staff 25 (CMA) was observed to give Resident 14 the Advair Diskus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper placement of a resident's urinary catheter bag and appropriate infection control practices were in place for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 2 and 53) reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for cross-contamination and infection. Findings include: 1. Resident 53 was admitted to the facility in 4/2023 with diagnoses including presence of an ileostomy (an artificial opening on the abdominal wall through which waste material passes out of the body from the bowel). On 1/22/24 at 9:35 AM Resident 53 was observed to have a towel covering her/his abdomen taped around the edges. On 1/23/24 at 1:08 PM Resident 53 stated the facility still did not have ostomy pouches available and she/he was noted to have a towel covering her/his abdomen secured with tape. On 1/23/24 at 1:45 PM Staff 14 (LPN) stated the resident kept a towel over her/his abdomen because the facility was out of ostomy pouches. On 1/25/24 at 1:41 PM Staff 6 (LPN) stated Resident 53 removed the last pouch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0575 — pattern
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to have the required Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) poster posted for 1 of 2 floors observed for the LTCO poster. This placed residents and visitors at risk for not knowing how to reports concerns. Findings include: On 10/5/23 at 8:36 AM an observation of the first floor revealed the LTCO poster was not posted. On 10/5/23 at 8:36 AM Staff 9 (LPN) stated the first floor used to have the LTCO poster poster and verified the LTCO poster was no longer posted.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-07 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure enough dietary personal was assigned each shift for 31 of 31 days reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for not getting preferences honored, being served the incorrect food and incorrect food textures. Findings include: A review of the August 2023 Dietary Staff Timecards revealed the following number of shifts worked over eight hours: *Staff 12 (Dietary Aide) - 15 shifts up to 14.75 hours * Staff 13 (Dietary Aide) - 9 shifts up to 8.5 hours * Staff 14 (Cook) - 10 shifts up to 13.75 hours * Staff 15 (Dietary Aide) - 4 shifts ranging up to 9 hours * Staff 17 (Hospitality Aide) - partial month, 2 shifts up to 10.5 hours * Staff 19 (Cook) - partial month, 3 shifts up to 8.75 hours * Staff 28 (Cook) - 16 shifts up to 15 hours * Staff 29 (Dietary Aide) - 19 shifts up to 15.25 hours On 8/30/23 at approximately 8:30 AM an observation with Staff 20 (Infection Preventionist) of the resident refrigerators on both the first and second floor revealed the temperatures were not checked in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow posted menu's for 2 of 2 meals observed for dining. This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary needs. Findings include: On 8/30/23 at 9:40 AM Staff 11 (Cook) stated she was not able to order the food she needed because she had to stay within budget which resulted in the facility not serving the food on the menus because they did not have the needed food. Staff 11 stated the days menu listed chicken carbonara but the facility did not have the sauce or tortilla's so they would substitute chicken alfredo with rice and refried beans instead. Staff 11 further stated the residents were tired of the food offerings and wanted more of a variety. Staff 11 stated residents mostly received broccoli or green beans for vegetables. On 9/1/23 at 8:25 AM Staff 10 (CNA) verified the breakfast tray ticket listed pancakes, syrup, oatmeal, bacon strips, mixed fruit cup and drinks as the menu items. Staff 10 verifed the resident food trays did not include bacon and the mixed fruit cup was substituted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable and homelike environment for 2 of 2 floors reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for an unclean and unsafe environment. Findings include: 1. The 4/27/23 and 5/31/23 Resident Council Notes revealed the residents verbalized concerns related to unclean bathrooms, cob webs, odor and sticky floors. On 8/30/23 at approximately 8:30 AM an environmental observation of the facility was started with Staff 20 (Infection Preventionist). The following concerns were identified: Second Floor: *205 - The floor was dirty, had black tire track marks throughout room and dirt marks on wall. *206 - The floor and wall was dirty, black marks all over the floor, duct tape on floor and paint peeling off wall behind both beds. *208: The floors were dirty with black lines on floor and the windowsill was scratched up. *210: There were black lines on floor. *212: The floors were dirty with cracked linoleum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain the exterior safety railing for 1 of 1 buildings reviewed for accident hazards. This placed residents, visitors and staff at risk for serious injury. Findings include: On 8/23/23 at approximately 9:00 AM two residents were observed to be in the sitting in their wheelchairs on the front sidewalk. The residents did not touch the safety railing. On 8/23/23 at 11:30 AM Resident 3 was observed in her/his wheelchair on the front sidewalk. The resident did not touch the safety railing. From 8/23/23 through 9/7/23 the outside metal staircase to walk down to the first floor (and is attached to the safety railing) had yellow caution tape around it. On 9/7/23 at 8:18 AM the safety railing parallel to the parking lot and alongside the sidewalk was found to have two large sections where the railing was not secure and able to be easily pushed in toward the hill that it was protecting residents, visitors and staff from falling down. The north side of the building had approximately six to seven loose sidewalk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure clean, safe drinking water was served to the residents on 1 of 2 floors (2nd floor) observed for dining services. This placed residents at risk of food-borne illness. Findings include: The 4/27/23 and 5/31/23 Resident Council Notes revealed cobwebs in the bathrooms and overall the bathrooms need attention. On 8/30/23 at 8:05 AM a general observation of the second resident rooms was conducted. The bathrooms were dirty and in need of cleaning. On 9/7/23 at 7:35 AM room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have plastic, disposable water bottles in the room. On 9/7/23 at 7:40 AM an observation of the second floor revealed no public drinking water station and no sinks to obtain water from in the public areas. On 9/7/23 at 7:35 AM Staff 10 (CNA) and Staff 24 (CNA) stated the only place staff could get water for the residents was the bathroom sink. Staff 10 stated the facility previously had a water station but staff were told it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident representative of a hospital transfer for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for notifications. This placed resident representatives at risk for being uninformed of current resident status. Findings include: Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 2015 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease. The 7/12/23 Discharge Summary indicated Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital from the dialysis facility. Review of Resident 1's medical record revealed no evidence Resident 1's representative was notified of the hospital transfer on 7/12/23. On 8/23/23 at 5:00 PM Witness 1 (Complainant) stated Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital and she/he was not notified. On 8/23/23 at 11:30 AM Staff 4 (LPN Resident Care Manager) verified Resident 1's representative was not notified of the hospital transfer on 7/12/23.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation for 4 of 6 sampled residents (#s 2, 16, 17 and 18) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for financial abuse. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including hypertension. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including diabetes. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including convulsions. The 8/17/23 facility records indicated Resident 2 reported she/he and three other residents loaned Staff 21 (CNA) money and did not get paid back. The 8/17/23 Facility Investigation indicated Resident 2 loaned Staff 21 twenty dollars and did not get the money back. Resident 16 indicated Staff 21 asked her/him for one hundred dollars as he did not have money for food, Resident 16 loaned it to him but did Staff 21 did not pay the money. Resident 17 requested Staff 21 give twenty dollars…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise a residents plan of care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for lack of food. Findings include: Resident 18 re-admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including depression. The current Nutrition Care Plan revealed an 11/24/20 intervention which indicated Resident 18's family would bring in lunch and dinner. The 11/27/20 intervention instructed staff to check with Resident 18 to ensure her/his family brought in lunch and dinner, if not to notify the kitchen daily. Records revealed Resident 18's family was out of state and unable to bring the resident lunch and dinner. On 9/7/23 at 2:12 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated the family member lives out of state every summer and the care plan needed to be updated.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for 5 of 7 sampled residents (#s 2, 3, 16, 17 and 18) reviewed for medications and abuse. This placed residents at risk for missed medications and financial abuse. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses of diabetes and glaucoma. The 7/17/23 Facility Records indicated Resident 3 requested her/his medications, Staff 22 (LPN) did not understand Resident 3's Spanish so told the resident to return to their room and to speak English, not Spanish. Resident 3 stated Staff 22 did not administer the medications and documented she/he refused the medications which she/he did not. The July 2023 MARs revealed the following 8:00 PM and 9:00 PM medications documented as refused: *Lidocaine External Patch 4%, remove per schedule (pain patch) *Systane Nighttime Ophthalmic Ointment. (artificial tears eye drops) *Xalantan Ophthalmic sol 0.005% (glaucoma eye drops) *Brimonidine Tartrate Ophthalmic sol 0.2% (glaucoma eye…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1 and 3) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for worsening medical symptoms. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 2015 with diagnoses including hypertension and end stage renal disease. The 7/20/23 Physician Order instructed to administer Midodrine HCL 10 mg tablet every six hours and to hold for systolic blood pressure greater than 110. The July 2023 MARs revealed the Midodrine was administered as ordered on 7/28/23. The medication instructed to administer one 10 mg tablet (not two tablets). The 7/28/23 Facility Investigation revealed Staff 5 administered two tablets instead of one of Midodrine to Resident 1 on 7/28/23. The bubble pack (medication dispensing form) for the Midodrine had 2 tablets inside each bubble pack. The directions indicated to give 10 mg; it did not indicate the dosage of each tablet. The CMA immediately reported the medication error, and both the pharmacy and physician were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview it was determined the facility failed to serve residents the correct texture food for 1 of 1 kitchens reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for aspiration. Findings include: On 8/30/23 Staff 11 (Cook) due to staffing concerns residents were sent out food with the wrong tray tickets and not getting the correct texture as ordered. Staff 11 offered an example from the day prior when a resident was given taquitos and the tray was returned to the kitchen because it was the wrong texture. On 9/7/23 at 7:45 AM Staff 10 (CNA) stated dietary gave a resident who was on a regular puree diet the wrong textured food. The CNA discovered the error before the resident started to eat. On 9/7/23 at 8:26 AM Staff 18 (Dietary Aide) verified residents were sometimes getting the wrong tray card on their tray and occasionally trays were sent out with the incorrect texture.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a residents food preferences were honored for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 6 and 18) reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for weight loss and malnutrition. Findings include: 1. Resident 18 was readmitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including depression. The current Nutrition Care Plan revealed a 9/7/21 revision for the resident to have vanilla or chocolate ice cream at every meal. The 8/5/22 Nutrition Assessment indicated Resident 19 received two ice creams with each meal. On 8/30/23 Staff 11 (Cook) stated the dietary staff was understaffed, they were not getting the food they needed because they had to stay within budget and verified food was sent out with the wrong try tickets/food. On 9/7/23 at 7:20 AM Staff 22 (CNA) stated the dietary staff are frequently making mistakes on the food trays. Staff 22 stated the resident dislikes were missed or the residents did not receive what they asked for. Staff 22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately document in the medical record for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate medical records. Findings include: Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses of diabetes and glaucoma. The 7/17/23 Facility Records indicated Resident 3 requested her/his medications, Staff 22 (LPN) did not understand Resident 3's Spanish so told the resident to return to their room and to speak English, not Spanish. Resident 3 stated Staff 22 did not administer the medications and documented she/he refused the medications which she/he did not. The July 2023 MARs revealed the following 8:00 PM and 9:00 PM medications documented as refused: *Lidocaine External Patch 4%, remove per schedule (pain patch) *Systane Nighttime Ophthalmic Ointment. (artificial tears eye drops) *Xalantan Ophthalmic sol 0.005% (glaucoma eye drops) *Brimonidine Tartrate Ophthalmic sol 0.2% (glaucoma eye drops) *Cosopt Ophthalmic sol 22.3-6/8 mg/ml (glaucoma eye drops)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and interview it was determine the facilty failed to ensure resident equipment was in good working order for 2 of 2 floors reviewed for equipment. This placed residents at risk for accidents and injuries. Findings include: 1. The August 2023 maintenance records revealed Resident 19's bed had multiple work order requests for the bed to be fixed. On 8/29/23 at 10:57 AM Staff 10 (CNA) stated Resident 19's bed was broken, the foot of the bed would not go up, the resident would slide down and need to get boosted up three to four times each shift. The issue was put into the maintenance event log system several times but the bed had still not been fixed. On 8/29/23 at 11:07 an observation was completed of Resident 19's bed with Staff 3 (Regional RN). The bottom of the bed was at a lower angle. An unsuccessful attempt was made to move the foot of the bed up. Staff 3 verified Resident 19's bed was not in good working order as the foot of the bed was not level with the rest of the bed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to ensure call lights were answered timely and bathing was completed for 1 of 2 floors (first floor) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of hygiene and delayed care. Findings include 1. Resident Council Notes for 9/2022 and 10/2022 were reviewed with Staff 17 (Activities) and revealed the residents reported long call light response times. On 11/2/22 at 3:15 PM room [ROOM NUMBER]'s call light was activated by the resident. At 3:30 PM non-nursing staff entered the resident's room and the resident stated she/he was waiting for her/his CNA. At 3:47 PM, 32 minutes later, Staff 15 (CNA) entered the resident's room. At 11/2/22 at 3:54 PM Staff 15 stated she was assisting another resident with bathing and she was not able to answer the call light for room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff 15 stated her/his hall partner was split between the first and second floor and the hall partner was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to keep a bathroom call light at accessible length for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#40) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for not being able to call for assistance in the event of a fall. Findings include: Resident 40 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder. Resident 40 resided in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The 9/2/19 Care Plan indicated Resident 40 was independent to moderate assistance with toileting. The Care plan indicate the resident was a moderate risk for falls related to weakness. On 10/31/22 at 12:30 PM the call light cord in the bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was observed to be about eight inches long and not able to be reached from the floor level. On 11/4/22 at 11:45 AM the call light cord in the bathroom was observed to be short and frayed at the end. The cord measured seven inches long. Staff 20 (CNA) stated Resident 40 used the bathroom independently. Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-07 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a written notification to 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 53 and 264) reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notices. This placed residents at risk for unknown financial liabilities. Findings include: 1. Resident 53 was admitted to the facility with Medicare Part A services (skilled services including therapy) on 7/21/22. The resident's last covered day of Part A services was 10/5/22 with the facility issuing a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) letting the resident know of potential financial liability because Resident 53 remained in the facility after Medicare Part A ended. There was no documentation indicating Resident 53 was issued a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) which notified the resident skilled services were ending and their right to an appeal. On 11/2/22 at 1:58 PM Staff 5 (Social Services) stated she issued both the NOMNC and SNF ABN at the time of Resident 53's discharge from skilled services however she was unable to provide documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure comfortable sound levels were maintained in 1 of 2 halls (North Hall) for 3 residents (#s 13, 29 and 44) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for an unhomelike environment. Findings include: From 10/31/22 through 11/3/22 the following observations were made from the hall and with residents present both in the hallway and in rooms with open doors: - 10/31/22 at 11:30 AM Resident 21 was sitting up in a wheelchair and was yelling out while in her/his room. One staff came into room and the resident continued to yell once the staff left the room. -10/31/22 at 12:04 PM the resident was yelling. -11/2/22 from 11:13 AM to 11:20 AM the resident was up in the wheelchair yelling off and on in a high pitch with periods of laughing. A staff was observed attempting to distract the resident, once the staff left the resident continued to yell. -On 11/2/22 at 11:13 AM Resident 13 was in her/his room (next to Resident 21) and heard Resident 21 yelling out and told the resident to shut up. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately code the MDS for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 19 and 62) reviewed for hospitalizations and vision. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments. Findings include: 1. Resident 19 admitted in 2022 with diagnoses including diabetes. Resident 19's 9/2022 admission MDS indicated she/he had mild cognitive impairment, and her/his vision was adequate with corrective lenses. On 11/2/22 at 12:55 PM Staff 9 (LPN Resident Care Manager Assistant) stated she was unaware Resident 19 had glasses and did not believe she/he wore glasses. On 11/4/22 at 2:00 PM Staff 2 (DNS) and Staff 3 (Corporate RN) were provided this information and affirmed the MDS was likely coded in error. 2. Resident 62 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive. The 8/7/22 Discharge Return not Anticipated MDS coded Resident 62 as discharging to an acute hospital. An 8/7/22 progress note indicated Resident 62 discharged home. On 11/3/22 at 2:50 PM Staff 6 (RN, MDS Coordinator) confirmed 62's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-07 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to address vision needs in a timely manner for 1 of 2 sample residents (#19) reviewed for vision needs. This placed residents at risk impaired interaction with staff and the environment. Findings include Resident 19 admitted in 2022 with diabetes. Resident 19's 9/2022 admission MDS indicated she/he had mild cognitive impairment, and her/his vision was adequate with corrective lenses. On 10/31/22 at 11:00 AM Resident 19 stated she/he needed a vision appointment, but no one talked to her/him about this. A review of Resident 19's medical record revealed no documentation that indicated any steps were taken including offering services, contacting family, or making an appointment, to manage her/his vision needs. On 11/2/22 at 12:55 PM - Staff 9 (LPN Resident Care Manager Assistant) stated normally we try to schedule residents with services promptly. Staff 9 confirmed this did not occur for Resident 19.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the facility applied a splint for a resident with impaired ROM for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#28) reviewed for ROM. This placed residents at risk for pain. Findings include: Resident 28 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including dementia. A 1/2/22 OT Evaluation and Plan of Treatment form revealed the resident had a contracture of the left hand. The goal was for the resident to tolerate daily positioning with custom splinting to reduce contractures. On 10/31/22 at 11:48 AM a sign was observed to be posted in Resident 28's room above her/his bed. The sign was dated 1/2/22 and indicated the resident was to have a left hand splint. The splint was to be worn for four hours and was to be removed for one hour during the day or if the splint was not used gauze was to be placed under the fingers. A 10/2022 TAR revealed a left hand splint was applied at 8:00 AM on 10/1/22 and removed at 8:00 PM on 10/1/22. The treatment was discontinued after 10/1/22. A Care Plan updated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident received sufficient fluid intake and failed to follow RD recommendations for nutritional supplements for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 1, 25 and 49) reviewed for hydration and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for dehydration and weight loss. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to facility in 2/2019 with diagnoses including diabetes and functional quadriplegia (complete immobility due to severe physical disability or frailty). The 9/26/22 Annual MDS indicated Resident 1 required extensive assistance, one-person with eating/drinking and had range of motion impairment to both her/his upper and lower extremities. Resident 1's 10/5/22 Care Plan included potential for fluid deficit related to dependence on staff for fluids. Interventions included hydration pass and assistance with intake. On 10/31/22 at 11:36 AM Witness 2 (Family) reported Resident 1's skin and lips were often dry and stated a request was made to the facility to offer Resident 1 hydration in between meals. When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-07 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to re-evaluate, assess and implement interventions of behavioral needs for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#21) reviewed for behavior/emotional health. This placed residents at risk for unmet psychosocial well being. Findings include: Resident 21 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, schizophrenia, depression and altered mental status. From 10/31/22 through 11/3/22 the following observations were made from the hall and with residents present both in the hallway and residents' room: -10/31/22 at 11:30 AM Resident 21 was sitting up in a wheelchair and was yelling out while in her/his room. One staff came into the room and the resident continued to yell once the staff left the room. - 10/31/22 at 12:04 PM the resident continued to yell. - 11/2/22 from 11:13 AM to 11:20 AM the resident was up in the wheelchair yelling off and on in a high pitch with periods of laughing. Staff were observed attempting to distract the resident. Once the staff left the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-07 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was assisted in obtaining timely dental services for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 19 and 32) reviewed for dental services. This placed residents at risk for worsening dental status. Findings include: 1. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including heart disease. A 5/21/21 Significant Change MDS indicated the resident was discharged from hospice. The resident was assessed to have broken front teeth, likely had cavities but denied pain. The resident was able to eat as desired. A Care Plan initiated in 2020 indicated the resident had dental health problems related to missing and broken teeth and staff were to coordinate arrangements for dental care as needed. The resident's record revealed dental services were not provided until 10/13/22. Resident 32's 10/13/22 dental visit summary note revealed the plan was to remove non-fixable decayed teeth and make a partial. On 11/3/22 at 9:24 AM Staff 5 (Social Services Director) stated if a resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were complete and accurate for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 15 and 19) reviewed for care planning and unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate medical records. Findings include: 1. Resident 15 admitted in 2022 with diagnoses including major depression. Resident 15 had a prescription for Aripiprazole 5 mg which was reduced via gradual dose reduction (GDR) from 10 mg on 7/4/2021. Documentation revealed there was no subsequent GDR attempted. On 11/4/22 at 11:30 AM Staff 9 (LPN care manager) located documentation that indicated Resident 15 was not on Aripiprazole from 4/29/22 through 5/3/22. On 11/4/22 at 1:30 PM Staff 3 (Corporate RN) located documentation indicating a GDR attempt that was not carried out due to Resident 15 discharging to the hospital in 4/2022. Staff 3 confirmed none of the information provided by Staff 9 or herself was locatable in the medical record. 2. Resident 19 admitted in 2022 with diagnoses including major depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVAMERE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of EugeneEugene, OR 1 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of LebanonLebanon, OR 2 of 5Avamere At Pacific RidgeTacoma, WA 2 of 5Avamere Health Services Of Rogue ValleyMedford, OR 2 of 5Avamere Olympic Rehabilitation Of SequimSequim, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation At Park WestSeattle, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of IssaquahIssaquah, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Oregon CityOregon City, OR 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of ShorelineSeattle, WA 2 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation of BurienBurien, WA 2 of 5Avamere Riverpark Of EugeneEugene, OR 3 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of HillsboroHillsboro, OR 4 of 5Avamere Court At KeizerKeizer, OR 4 of 5Avamere Crestview Of PortlandPortland, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation At RidgemontPort Orchard, WA 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of ClackamasGladstone, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Junction CityJunction City, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of King CityTigard, OR 4 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of NewportNewport, OR 4 of 5Avamere Transitional Care Of Puget SoundTacoma, WA 4 of 5Richmond Beach RehabShoreline, WA 4 of 5The PEARL AT KRUSE WAYLake Oswego, OR 5 of 5Avamere At Three FountainsMedford, OR 5 of 5Avamere Rehabilitation Of Cascade ParkVancouver, WA 5 of 5Queen Anne HealthcareSeattle, WA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ARISO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2014
ARI OPERATIONS, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2014
AVAMERE GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2014
KARL RICKARD MILLER JR REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2014
MILLER, KARLIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2014
MIDCAP FINCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/30/2014
CAVALLO, GLENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2025
FEAKIN, CODYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FUNDERBERG, MICHELLEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
GARCIA, ROBERTOIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2026
INSKEEP, TODDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/21/2022
REID, MISTYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2025
STAPLES, CAROLYNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
STRUNK, COLBYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
VANDERZANDEN, CARRIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
AVAMERE HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2014
AVAMERE SKILLED ADVISORS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2014
DANA, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2022
FANUNAL, LORIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2023
GIBBINS, DUSTINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
HOSKINS, TONIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
PRESLEY, YOLANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
RUDEN, NATHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
SEIFERT, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
VANGORDER, DIANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
CONSOLIDATED BILLING SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2014
INCOVATE SOLUTIONS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/21/2022
MOSS ADAMS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2014
RANDE HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
SABRA HEALTH CARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/17/2017
SABRA HEALTH CARE REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/17/2017
SABRA HEALTH CARE, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/17/2017
SNAPMEDTECH,INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/08/2025
BECERRA, SHANNONIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
GAMES, KIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2024
SCOTT, DEBRAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 57 rows in the source record cover these 36 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$982K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 90%Medicare 2%Other / private 7%

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $982K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$523per resident / day
operating cost
$15,908per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$530per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385189. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next