No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Dunmore Health Care Center

1000 Mill Street, Dunmore, PA 18512 · For profit - Corporation · 92 certified beds · (570) 342-7624 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (570) 342-7624 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607) — most recent Jul 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)$12,048 in federal fines
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $12,048 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-19)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1000 Meade St · (570) 342-0800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
617 3rd St · (570) 209-7440 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1219 Wheeler Ave · (570) 348-1176 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Hill St · (570) 344-0217 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
122 Kurtz St · (570) 344-1239

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.1%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.8%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.7%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.8%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.9%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.8%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.2%25.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.1%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine18.5%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.9%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.1%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.131.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.601.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 103 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.7%CMS range 34.4–51.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.9–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 4.9–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
43.0%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 86.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-07-09)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2025-12-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, medication administration records, physician orders, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to document that individualized non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to the administration of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication and failed to obtain and document the prescribing practitioner's clinical rationale and duration supporting continuation of the PRN psychotropic medication beyond the federally permitted 14-day period for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 35).Findings Include: Federal requirements for the use of psychotropic medications expect that psychotropic medications are used only when necessary to treat a specific, documented condition. A PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication order is limited to 14 days unless the prescribing practitioner documents the clinical rationale for extending the order and specifies the duration of the extension. Non-pharmacological interventions are approaches that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on select facility policy, a review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to ensure licensed nurses administered medications according to physician ordered parameters for 1 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 45). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, last reviewed June 25, 2026, indicated medications will be administered as ordered by the physician and vital signs (e.g., blood pressure and pulse) should be obtained if ordered by the physician. Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include hypertension (a chronic condition in which the force of blood pushing against artery walls is consistently too high) and hyperlipidemia (abnormally high levels of fats, like cholesterol and triglycerides, in the blood). A review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated June…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing of existing pressure injuries for one of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 5).Findings include: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality, the pressure ulcer best practice bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: Comprehensive skin assessment, standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment, and care planning and implementation to address the areas of risk. The American College of Physicians (ACP) is a national organization of internists, who specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of adults. The largest medical-specialty organization and second-largest physician group in the United States, Clinical Practice Guidelines, indicate that the treatment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of selected facility policies, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide pain management in accordance with physician orders and facility policy by failing to administer opioid pain medication within the physician-prescribed pain intensity scale and by failing to attempt and document non-pharmacological interventions before administering as needed (PRN) opioid pain medication for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 30 and 47).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Pain Management Protocol, last reviewed by the facility on June 25, 2026, indicated residents will be assessed for the presence and severity of pain using an appropriate pain assessment scale, such as a numeric pain rating scale, facial pain scale, or verbal descriptor scale. A numeric pain rating scale measures pain intensity from 0 through 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable. The policy indicated non-pharmacological…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, Resident Council meeting minutes, grievance documentation provided by the facility, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to make reasonable efforts to address concerns raised by the Resident Council and failed to keep residents informed regarding the status and outcome of identified concerns. The facility did not ensure ongoing communication or timely follow-up regarding issues presented by residents in resident council, and resident interviews for four of 10 residents reviewed. (Residents 2, 3, 4, 5).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Call Light Resident Communication Systems, last reviewed December 17, 2025, revealed it is the facility's policy to provide residents with a means of communicating with staff. The policy indicated it is the expectation of the facility staff to respond to the residents' needs and requests promptly. A review of a grievance dated April 6, 2026, revealed Resident 3 reported that at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records, select facility policies, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to securely store medications and restrict resident access to medications in accordance with facility policy for one of two nursing units (Unit 2) and one of ten residents reviewed (Resident 7), creating the potential for accident hazards.Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals, last reviewed December 17, 2025, revealed it is the facility policy that all medications and biologicals including bedside medications or biologicals are stored in a locked compartment within the resident's room. A review of the facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, last reviewed December 17, 2025, revealed it is the facility policy that self-administered medications are stored in a safe and secure place, which is not accessible by other residents. If safe storage is not possible in a resident's room,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to assess bowel and bladder function, identify residents' patterns of incontinence, and develop individualized toileting programs to restore or maintain normal bowel and bladder function to the extent possible for two of 10 residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 8).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Continence Management Program, last reviewed April 15, 2026, revealed that upon admission, the admitting licensed nurse is responsible for completing a head-to-toe assessment (a comprehensive physical assessment of the body from head to feet), including an interview with the resident and a review of underlying medical conditions that may affect the resident's ability to participate in a continence management program. The policy indicated that nursing staff will identify each resident who is incontinent and assess, plan, and implement appropriate treatment and services to restore or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of clinical records, and resident and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to implement the physician-ordered bowel management protocol and to notify the physician when ordered interventions were not effective for one resident (Resident 19) out of 21 residents reviewed.Findings include: According to the American Academy of Family Physicians (The American Academy of Family Physicians is one of the largest medical organizations in the US founded to promote the science and art of family medicine) the primary goal of constipation management should be symptom improvement, and the secondary goal should be the passage of soft, formed stool without straining at least three times per week.A review of Resident 19 ' s clinical record revealed active physician orders dated May 8, 2025, for a bowel regimen (a prescribed sequence of interventions to promote regular bowel movements and prevent constipation) as follows:Milk of Magnesia (MOM) Suspension 400 mg/5ML…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, employee personnel files and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to fully screen two employees out of five to ensure they were eligible for employment in a long term care nursing care facility. (Employees 1, and 2).Findings include:According to regulatory requirements under SS483.12(a)(3) and 483.12(b)(1) the facility must have written procedures for screening prospective employees, to include reviewing: the employment history (e.g., dates of employment position or title), particularly where there is a pattern of inconsistency; information from former employers, whether favorable or unfavorable; and/or documentation of status and any disciplinary actions from licensing or registration boards and other registries. A review of the facility's Resident Abuse policy last reviewed by the facility May 29, 2025, revealed the requirement for screening potential employees included obtaining references from two previous employers.Review of employee personnel files revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to administering a narcotic pain medication prescribed on an as-needed basis for one resident (Resident 6) out of 21 sampled residents. Findings include:A review of the facility's policy entitled Pain Management Policy with a policy review date of May 29,2025, indicated that non- pharmacological interventions (methods to relieve pain that do not involve medication, such as repositioning, relaxation techniques, heat/cold therapy, or distraction) will be attempted prior to the admission of a PRN (as needed) medication, If the non-pharmacological interventions fail then when corresponding intensity ratings, the resident will be administered the medication ordered for the corresponding pain rating within the PRN order.A review of Resident 6 ' s clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of controlled drug shift count records, facility policies, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of controlled (Schedule II) medications (controlled medications are drugs regulated under the federal Controlled Substances Act due to their potential for abuse or dependence, with Schedule II drugs having a high potential for abuse but accepted medical use) by both the oncoming and off-going nurses (the licensed nurses assuming or ending responsibility for a medication cart at the change of shift) for two of two medication carts observed (First Floor [NAME] Hall and First Floor East Hall).Findings include:A review of the facility policy entitled Inventory Control of Controlled Medications, last reviewed May 29, 2025, revealed that controlled drugs (medications regulated under federal and state law due to their potential for abuse) must be inventoried and documented under proper security and in accordance with state and federal regulations. The policy further indicated that Schedule II controlled medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the attending physician failed to document a clinical rationale for declining the pharmacist ' s identified irregularities in the medication regimen for one resident (Resident 49) out of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance (a condition characterized primarily by memory loss and cognitive decline without significant behavioral changes), encephalopathy (a general term describing brain disease or malfunction that can cause symptoms ranging from mild confusion to severe cognitive impairment or coma), respiratory failure (a serious condition in which the lungs cannot adequately oxygenate the blood), and a history of multiple falls.A review of a consultation report completed by the facility ' s consultant pharmacist dated July…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to adhere to acceptable storage and labeling for multi-dose medications in one of two medication carts observed (1 East Hall).Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals, last reviewed by the facility on May 29, 2025, indicated that if a multi-use medication vial/injectable (containers intended for multiple uses for one or more patients that require puncture of the rubber stopper or seal to withdraw doses on different occasions) has been opened and accessed, the vial is to be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a different expiration timeframe for that opened vial.An observation of the medication cart located on the 1 East Hall unit, conducted on October 1, 2025, at 8:22 AM in the presence of Employee 3 (Licensed Practical Nurse), revealed one (1) multi-dose insulin pen of Insulin Aspart (a short-acting insulin medication used to lower blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, select resident incident report, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to thoroughly conduct and document the results of a professional nursing assessment regarding the clinical status of a resident following a change in condition for one resident (Resident 1) out of 8 residents reviewed. Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient ' s EHR (electronic health record) to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high-quality care in the continuity of patient care: · Assessments · Clinical problems · Communications with other health care professionals regarding the patient · Communication with and education of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents receive appropriate services and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence for one resident out of 18 sampled (Resident 6). Findings include: A review of policy entitled Restorative Nursing Referral and Process Policy last reviewed by the facility on December 4, 2024, revealed it is the policy of the facility that Residents who could benefit from the nursing restorative program can be identified at the following times: -on admission -when other assessments are required, such as an MDS assessment -from the 24 hour report and the change of shift report -at morning stand up meeting -at care plan meeting and other resident-focused meetings -at risk management meetings such as behavior management, nutrition at risk -during restorative weekly meetings. The procedure to include, a referral from the therapy department, goals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized measures for the toileting needs of two residents out of 18 sampled residents for bowel and bladder management (Residents 27 and 74). Findings included: A facility policy entitled Continence Management Programs last reviewed by the facility December 2, 2024, indicated that the facility will design a plan to manage incontinence that is developed according to the resident's needs and capabilities. Upon admission, the admitting Nurse will complete a head-to-toe assessment which includes interview of resident and review of underlying conditions such as potential or actual diagnoses that may affect the ability to participate in a continence management program. The nursing staff will identify each resident who is incontinent, assess, and plan appropriate treatment and services to achieve or maintain as much normal urinary and/or bowel function as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to address a resident's dementia-related behavioral symptoms for two out of 18 residents (Resident 18 and 19). Findings include: A review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning). A review of Resident 18's admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated November 23, 2024, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of the resident's current care plan, initially dated November 21, 2024, revealed no documented evidence the facility had developed an individualized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the presence of physician documentation of the clinical rationale for the continued administration of an antidepressant medication for one resident out of five sampled residents for unnecessary medication use. (Resident 19). Findings included: A review of Resident 19's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute dementia (a chronic condition that causes a decline in mental abilities, such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, that interferes with daily life). A review of Resident 19's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated October 21, 2024, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of current Physicians orders dated April 4, 2024, revealed orders for Mirtazapine 15 mg (an antidepressant medication) by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain accurate clinical records for one of 18 residents sampled (Resident 19). Findings include: A review of Resident 19's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute dementia (a chronic condition that causes a decline in mental abilities, such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, that interferes with daily life). A review of a care plan initiated July 18, 2022, for cognitive deficit revealed the resident has a diagnosis of Dementia with Lewy Bodies (Lewy body dementia causes a decline in mental abilities that gradually gets worse over time. People with Lewy body dementia might see things that aren't there. This is known as visual hallucinations. They also may have changes in alertness and attention). The facility was noted to have changed clinical record systems on April 8, 2024. The above noted care plan was not completely transferred, to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review clinical records and facility provided documents it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a quality assurance plan, which was able to identify, and correct ongoing quality deficiencies related to complete and accurate medical records. Findings include: A review of a facility policy for Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program reviewed December 4, 2024, revealed the purpose of QAPI in the facility is to take a proactive approach to continually improving delivery of care and services and to engage residents, caregivers, and other clinical/operational partners in maximizing quality of life and quality of care. The facility will conduct performance improvement projects to examine and improve care and services which have been identified as opportunities for improvement. A review of Resident 19's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute dementia (a chronic condition that causes a decline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the facility's infection control tracking logs, the infection control and prevention policy, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive infection control program to prevent the spread of infectious diseases including scabies for two of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 56 and Resident CR1). Findings include: A review of the current facility policy for Infection Prevention and Control, last reviewed December 4, 2024, revealed it is the policy of the facility to maintain an organized, effective facility-wide program designed to systematically prevent, identify, control and reduce the risk of acquiring and transmitting infections among employees, volunteers, visitors and contract healthcare workers, to conduct surveillance of communicable disease and infectious outbreaks and to monitor employee health. A review of a facility policy entitled Scabies Management reviewed December 4, 2024, revealed, the purpose of the policy is to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to demonstrate it had ascertained if a resident had an advance directive upon admission and whether the resident would like information to formulate an advance directive for two out of 18 sampled residents (Residents 74 and 18). Findings included: A review of a facility entitled Advance Care Planning meeting Protocol last reviewed by the facility on December 2, 2024, indicated that it was the policy of the facility that upon admission to the facility, the appropriate team member would meet with the resident and offer to formulate an advance directive to ensure their preferences (Living Wills, Medical [NAME] of Attorney, etc.) are recorded in their medical record and further used to develop their plan of care. Social Services, along with other team members as needed, will meet with the resident and family members within a reasonable timeframe (3-5 days from admission) to discuss pertinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments accurately reflected the status of one resident out of 18 sampled (Resident 49). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to have included cardiovascular disease, depression, and diabetes. A review of Resident 49's quarterly review Minimum Data Assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated November 2, 2024, revealed in Section P - P0100 Restraints was coded D Other to indicate the resident had a form of restraints in place. A review of Resident 49's clinical record failed to reveal that the resident had restraints in place. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on December 12, 2024, at 10:00 AM, revealed that Resident 49 did not have physician's orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of clinical records, and resident and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician orders for bowel protocol for one resident (Resident 59) out of 18 residents reviewed to promote normal bowel activity to the extent practicable. Findings include: According to the American Academy of Family Physicians (The American Academy of Family Physicians is one of the largest medical organizations in the US founded to promote the science and art of family medicine) the primary goal of constipation management should be symptom improvement, and the secondary goal should be the passage of soft, formed stool without straining at least three times per week. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 59 had physician orders dated May 1, 2024, for the following bowel regimen: - Milk of Magnesia (MOM) Suspension 400 mg/5ML (Magnesium Hydroxide), Give 30 ml by mouth as needed for constipation if no BM (bowel movement) after the third day. -Bisacodyl…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder for one out of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 78). Findings include: A review of Resident 78's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD a mental health condition that's caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event, either being part of it or witnessing it. Symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares, severe anxiety, and uncontrollable thoughts about the event). The resident's current care plan, in effect at the time of review on December 11, 2024, did not identify the resident's PTSD symptoms or triggers related to this diagnosis and resident specific interventions to meet the resident's needs for minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of select facility policy, clinical records, and select incident/accident reports and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards to prevent accidental ingestion and misuse of substances not intended for oral use and to prevent access to resident personal care supplies, treatment products, and medications that may be mishandled or consumed by residents for whom the medications were not prescribed, for two residents out of eight sampled (Resident A1 and A2) and observed on two of two nursing units. Findings include: A review of an undated facility policy titled General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration indicated that facility staff should not leave medications or chemicals unattended. Facility staff should enter the date opened on the label of the medication with shortened expiration dates for example insulins and irrigation solutions. A review of an undated facility policy titled Storage and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select reports, facility policy, and clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to demonstrate that licensed nurses thoroughly assessed and consistently monitored a resident after the resident ingested a potentially harmful substance for one resident out of eight sampled (Resident A1). Findings included: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates that the registered nurse was to collect complete ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of grievances lodged with the facility, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance as evidenced by four out of 11 residents sampled (Residents 1, 8, 9, and 10). Findings include: A review of a grievance submitted by Resident 4's representative dated January 23, 2024, revealed that the resident's representative had to physically call facility herself and ask for someone to answer her mother's call bell since no staff had answered the call bell. Review of the facility's resolution revealed that on January 24, 2024, nursing staff were provided written and/or verbal education via telephone to please be attentive to answering call bells. A resident call bell should be answered within 5-10 minutes. It is everyone's job to answer call bells, not just CNAs (nurse aides). Please do not walk by a call bell without addressing the resident's needs. Observations performed on the second-floor resident care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy and clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide services necessary to maintain adequate personal hygiene and grooming of residents' dependent on staff for assistance with these activities of daily living for three out of 11 residents reviewed (Residents 2, CR1, and CR2). Findings include: A review of a facility policy for Resident Bath/Showering/Scheduling Policy, dated as last revised September 9, 2022, indicated that residents will be bathed or showered according to their preferences in order to maintain healthy hygiene and skin condition. According to the policy, each resident will be asked about his/her bathing preferences upon admission (type of bath, preferred days and times). Each resident will be scheduled to receive bathing a minimum of two times per week, unless they prefer less frequent baths. The procedures were that If the bath/shower cannot be given or the resident refuses, the nursing assistant will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records, grievances lodged with the facility and nurse staffing levels and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide and/or efficiently deploy sufficient nursing staff to consistently provide timely care, including assistance with activities of daily living, to meet the physical needs and promote the psychosocial well-being of each resident including Resident 4, Resident 2, Resident CR1 and CR2). Findings include: A review of a grievance submitted by Resident 4's representative dated January 23, 2024, revealed that the resident's representative had to physically call facility herself and ask for someone to answer her mother's call bell since no staff had answered the call bell. Review of the facility's resolution revealed that on January 24, 2024, nursing staff were provided written and/or verbal education via telephone to please be attentive to answering call bells. A resident call bell should be answered within 5-10 minutes. It is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-12-12 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and facility-initiated transfer notices and a staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide written notices of facility-initiated hospital transfers to the resident and their representative for one resident out of the 18 sampled (Resident 2). Findings include: A review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 2 was transferred to the hospital on November 20, 2024, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the clinical record failed to reveal documented evidence the facility provided the resident and the resident's responsible party (RP) with a written notice of the facility-initiated transfer and reason for the transfer on November 20, 2024. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on December 12, 2024, at 9:10am, confirmed the facility had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-12-12 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and a staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notice of the facility's bed hold policy to a resident and the resident's representative upon the resident's transfer to the hospital for one resident out of the 18 sampled (Resident 2). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 2 required transfer to the hospital on November 20, 2024, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documented evidence that the residents and/or their responsible parties or legal representatives were provided written information about the facility's bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) at the time of transfer. During an interview on December 12, 2024, at approximately 9:10 am, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was unable to provide evidence that the facility made Resident 2 and their representative, aware of a facility's bed-hold and reserve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-02-21 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of posted daily nurse staffing data and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete daily nursing time posting. Findings include: During an observation on February 21, 2024, at approximately 6:15 AM the facility's posted nursing time was observed at the entrance to the first-floor nursing unit. A review of the posted nursing time revealed that the posting was not dated. Further review of the posted nursing time revealed that there was no time available for the 3p to 11p shift. The facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing data accordingly. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(1)(3) Management

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$12,048 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $12,048 — penalty dated 2024-01-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Bryn Mawr Extended Care CenterBryn Mawr, PA 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, PA 1 of 5Gastonia Health & Rehab CenterGastonia, NC 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab CenterJohnstown, PA 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazleton, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5University Manor Health & RehaCleveland, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Health & Rehab CenterMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MadisonMadison, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MechanicsvilleMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
OHIO PENNSYSLVANIA PROPERTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2019
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
SAKALAS, LORIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2025
STEEVES, LORIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2025
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2007
RKL LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/26/2023
SHG BOA LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/16/2025
SHG MT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/16/2025
TCF NATIONAL BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/19/2019
MUSTO, KEVINIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$921K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 5%Other / private 16%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $921K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$356per resident / day
operating cost
$10,808per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$318per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395567. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next