Third Avenue Health & Rehab Center
702 Third Avenue, Kingston, PA 18704 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 65 certified beds · (570) 283-5848 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jul 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.7% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.3% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.8% | 17.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.9% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.0% | 25.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.5% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.2% | 68.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 10.2% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.9% | 9.5% | 12.0% | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
32.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 96 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 32.7%CMS range 24.8–41.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.0%CMS range 9.9–18.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.7–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.70 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 58.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policies, documentation provided by the facility, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide adequate supervision and implement appropriate, individualized fall prevention interventions based on assessed needs to ensure the safety of one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 50), resulting in multiple unwitnessed falls and significant injury, including a traumatic subdural hemorrhage and multiple fractures of the arm. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Fall Prevention and Management Policy, last reviewed by the facility February 13, 2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility to assist in fall management and prevention. The policy indicated an individualized, person-centered nursing care plan will be initiated and/or updated by the interdisciplinary team upon readmission to the facility. A clinical record review revealed Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 8) was fully informed of, and participated in decision-making regarding, a restriction preventing the resident from using the bathroom connected to the bedroom.Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes (a chronic condition affecting the body's ability to regulate blood sugar) and above-the-knee amputation of the left leg (surgical removal of the leg above the knee joint).A review of Resident 8's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally required standardized assessment used to evaluate a resident's functional and cognitive status and assist with care planning) dated December 16, 2025, revealed Resident 8 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a structured assessment of memory and orientation; scores of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0620 — isolatedNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, admission documentation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide and maintain required written admission information and documentation for one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 63).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Admissions Policy, last reviewed February 24, 2026, indicated the facility will admit only those individuals whose clinical (medical), physical (body function and mobility), psychosocial (mental health and social well-being), and emotional needs can be met by the facility. Review of the facility admission Agreement revealed the agreement included services, charges and fees, termination of the agreement, and miscellaneous areas to be reviewed with each newly admitted resident and/or resident representative. The admission Agreement included an admission Agreement signature page. Clinical record review revealed Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cervical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses accurately administered prescribed medication consistent with professional standards of practice for one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident 1).Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates the registered nurse was to carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound judgement based on preparation, knowledge, skills, understandings and past experiences in nursing situations. The LPN participates in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, select facility policy review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to consistently ensure the provision of respiratory care and supplemental oxygen in accordance with physician orders and facility policy for one resident out of 17 residents reviewed. (Resident 65) Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration (all routes) last reviewed by the facility on February 24, 2026, indicated that licensed clinicians with demonstrated competence are responsible for administering oxygen via the ordered route. The policy further requires staff to monitor oxygen delivery systems, including checking oxygen cylinder (oxygen tanks which contain oxygen under pressure) gauges to ensure an adequate oxygen supply is available to meet the residents' needs. During an initial facility tour of the facility on March 24, 2026, at 12:12 PM, Resident 65 was observed seated in a wheelchair in the main dining room with an oxygen tank…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, select policy review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the timely acquisition and availability of prescribed medications for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 7).Findings include:Clinical record review revealed that Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include (a chronic medical condition in which the body cannot properly regulate blood sugar levels) and required injectable medication to maintain acceptable blood glucose levels. A review of Resident 7's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated January 2, 2026, revealed that Resident 7 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14, (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility practices, it was determined the facility failed to ensure effective management and execution of the duties and responsibilities of the food and nutrition services department to provide timely meal service for three of 17 residents reviewed (Residents 66, 23, and 8).Findings include: Observation during the breakfast meal on March 25, 2026, at 8:05 AM revealed Resident 66's roommate was eating breakfast in their semi-private room (a room shared by two residents). Interview with Resident 66, who was alert and oriented (able to understand and respond appropriately), at that time revealed she had not received her breakfast meal tray despite her roommate receiving a tray. Resident 66 confirmed she prefers to eat meals in her room and does not attend the dining room. Observation of the food cart located in the hallway outside Resident 66's room revealed the resident's breakfast tray was not present on the cart. Interview with Employee 3 NA (nurse aide) on March 25, 2026, at 8:10 AM confirmed she delivered a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, select facility policy review, and staff and family interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide and ensure implementation of specialized rehabilitative services in accordance with professional standards of practice for positioning assessment, intervention, care planning, and staff training for 1 of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 12).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Seating and Positioning Program last reviewed by the facility on February 24, 2026, indicated that positioning is a cooperative effort between nursing and therapy services. Evaluation of the resident with recommendations for positioning is the responsibility of the Occupational and/or Physical Therapy Department under a physician's order. Development of the positioning program and provision of positioning aids is the responsibility of the Physical (PT) and Occupational Therapy (OT) Departments. Upon completion of the positioning program and provision of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy, facility investigative reports, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate investigation was conducted into an allegation of misappropriation of medication for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 1).Findings included: A review of a facility policy entitled Pennsylvania Resident Abuse revealed it is the policy of the facility to investigate all allegations, suspicions and incidents of abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, intimidation, exploitation of residents, misappropriation of resident property and injuries of unknown source. The policy further defined misappropriation as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. Further review of the policy revealed the person investigating an incident is to interview the residents, the accused, and all witnesses. The policy stated that witnesses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, a review of facility-provided documents, and employee interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination, including rodent activity, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in multiple areas of the kitchen. Findings include: According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Controlling Wild Rodent Infestations, rodents can carry many diseases that can spread directly or indirectly to people, including through contact with rodent droppings, urine, or saliva. Signs of rodents include droppings (feces) and gnaw marks. The CDC indicates that to determine if the activity is current, regular cleaning and disinfecting are required. When droppings are identified following cleaning, it can confirm the presence of rodents. During an interview on May 28, 2025, the Director of Maintenance indicated the facility has an external pest management company that provides services to the building about once a month. The Director of Maintenance explained the pest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, a review of facility-provided documents, and resident and employee interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, including observations made on one of the three nursing units (Grey Unit- bedrooms of Residents 4, 23, and 39), experiences reported by one resident out of 18 sampled (Resident 23), and experiences reported by two residents during a group interview (Residents 27 and 28). Findings include: According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Controlling Wild Rodent Infestations, rodents can carry many diseases that can spread directly or indirectly to people, including through contact with rodent droppings, urine, or saliva. Signs of rodents include droppings (feces) and gnaw marks. The CDC indicates that to determine if the activity is current, regular cleaning and disinfecting are required. When droppings are identified following cleaning, it can confirm the presence of rodents. During an interview on May 28, 2025, the Director of Maintenance indicated the facility has an external pest management…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that one resident out of 18 sampled (Resident 26) was afforded the right to participate in care and treatment decisions, to be fully informed of treatment, and to make choices about preferred treatment options. The findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include osteoarthritis (a joint disease characterized by the breakdown of cartilage causing pain and stiffness), and chronic pain. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated May 2, 2025, revealed that Resident 26 was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status-a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide restorative nursing services as planned to maintain mobility for one resident (Resident 53) out of 13 residents sampled. Findings include: Review of the facility Restorative Nursing Services Policy last reviewed February 13, 2025, indicated residents who could benefit from the nursing restorative programs can be identified at the following times: on admission, when other assessment are required such as a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care), from the 24-hour report and the change of shift report, at morning standup meeting, at care planning, and other resident-focused meetings, at risk management meetings such as behavior management, nutrition at risk, and during weekly restorative weekly reviews. If appropriate the resident will begin the restorative program. Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to adhere to acceptable storage and labeling for multi-dose medications in one of two medication carts observed (Teal Hall). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage last reviewed by the facility February 13,2025, indicated that multi-use vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g. needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. An observation of the medication cart located on Teal Hall unit on May 29, 2025, at 8:24 AM, in the presence of Employee 2 (Licensed Practical Nurse ) of the medication stored in the medication cart, revealed two (2) multi-dose insulin pens of Insulin Lispro ( a fast acting insulin medication used to lower blood sugar ) and Insulin Glargine (a long acting insulin medication used to lower blood sugar) that had been opened and available for use, but not dated when initially opened. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility investigative documentation, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality to ensure that licensed nurses promptly assessed and evaluated a resident after a significant medication error occurred to assure the resident received necessary care and services timely for one resident (Resident 1) and failed to implement physician's orders for wound treatments for two residents (Resident 3 and 4) out of 12 sampled. Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates the registered nurse was to collect complete ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely notify the physician and the resident's responsible party of medication error for one resident out of 12 sampled (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that gradually destroys memory and thinking skills). A review of Resident 1's quarterly minimum data set (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated August 2, 2024 revealed a BIMS score of 3 (BIMS- brief interview for mental status, a tool to assess the residents attention, orientation and ability to register and recall new information, a score of 00- 07 equates to severe cognitive impairment). A review of a facility investigative report dated September 18, 2024 at 12:38 PM revealed on September 15, 2024, the resident was given a medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, a facility investigative report, nurse competencies and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to to ensure that licensed nursing staff possessed the skills and competencies necessary to assure administration of medications accurately and safely for one resident out of 12 sampled (Residents 1). Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound judgement based on preparation, knowledge, skills, understanding and past experiences in nursing situations. The LPN participates in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of nursing care in settings where nursing takes place. 21.148 Standards of nursing conduct (a) A licensed practical nurse shall: (1) undertake a specific practice only if the licensed practical nurse has the necessary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of pharmacy documentation, clinical records and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to assure timely acquiring and administration of medications to one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 4). Findings include: A review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of the vulva (cancer of the female genitals). A review of physician orders dated September 13, 2024, revealed the following orders: Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) 5mg (milligrams) every 6 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. Ativan (anti-anxiety medication) 0.5mg every 12 hours as needed for generalized anxiety disorder. A review of a pharmacy delivery slip dated September 17, 2024, revealed the resident's medications were not delivered to the facility until September 17, 2024, four days after the medication was ordered. The resident did not receive the medications as ordered due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, select facility policy, facility investigative reports, and staff interview it was revealed the facility failed to assure that one of 12 residents reviewed were free of significant medication errors (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of a facility pharmacy policy, entitled General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration last reviewed April 30, 2024 revealed prior to the administration of medication facility staff should verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication, at the correct dose, and the correct route, at the correct rate, at the correct time, for the correct resident. Further it is indicated the facility staff should verify the resident's identification (e.g. picture, armband, name). A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that gradually destroys memory and thinking skills). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records, according to professional standards of practice for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 1). Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient record to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high quality care in the continuity of patient care: Assessments, Clinical problems, Communications with other health care professionals regarding the patient, Communication with and education of the patient, family, and the patient's designated support person and other third parties. According to the Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely respond to a resident's increased level of pain and provide an effective pain management to alleviate pain for one resident of 13 residents sampled (Resident 52). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Pain Assessment and Management Protocol provided by the facility on July 31, 2024, indicated that any resident admitted to the facility would be assessed for pain and/or the potential for pain for the resident to reach and maintain his/her highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. The physician/provider will be notified of new onset of pain or significant increase in pain as appropriate. A review of Resident 52's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (is a medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, and orderly environment in the resident's main dining room area. Findings include: Observations of the resident's main dining room on [DATE], at 9:30 a.m., revealed four grey-pattered chairs with leather-like seats that appeared significant worn. Also, observed that the dining room windowpanes had significant debris and deceased bugs inside and the white colored blinds that covered the exit door window had cobwebs and live spiders adhered to the surface. Observed that the grey garbage inside of the resident's main dining room had splatter and debris adhered to the lid and the floor was sticky. Further observations of the resident's main dining room area on [DATE], at 12:30 p.m., revealed that the above observations continued. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on [DATE], at 1:39 p.m., confirmed the above observations and confirmed that the resident's dining area should be maintained in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy and investigative reports and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to identify and prevent potential misappropriation of resident property, medications, for one resident out of 13 sampled (Resident 49). Findings include: The facility policy for Abuse Protection, reviewed by the facility April 8, 2024, revealed, it is the policy of the facility to investigate all allegations, suspicions, and incidents of abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, intimidation, exploitation of residents, misappropriation of resident property and injuries of unknown injury. Facility staff must immediately begin an investigation and notify the applicable local and state agencies in accordance with the procedures in the policy. All allegations of abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property must be reported immediately to the Administrator, Director of Nursing, and to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely develop and implement a person-centered care plan to meet one resident's current needs for two of 13 sampled resident (Resident 26). Findings including: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (Minimum Data Set - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated May 18, 2024, revealed that Resident 26 was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score (BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) is a mandatory tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents upon admission into a long-term care facility) of 0 and required assistance from staff for activities of daily living. An observation of Resident 26's room on July 30, 2024, at approximately 10:30 a.m., revealed the resident's bed was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a discharge summary, which included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, the course of illness, corresponding treatment, discharge instructions, and a post-discharge care plan for one of three discharged resident records reviewed (Resident 23). Findings include: A review of the closed clinical record revealed that Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including MRSA infection, pneumonia, and heart failure, and discharged to home on May 25, 2024. A review of Resident 53's physician orders upon discharge revealed that the following medications were prescribed; amiodarone 200mg daily, amlodipine 5mg daily, calcitriol 0.25mcg weekly on Monday, Eliquis 5mg two times a day, furosemide 40mg daily, levothyroxine 75mcg daily, metoprolol succinate 50mg daily, and potassium chloride 10meq two times a day. Review of the closed record failed to provide evidence of disposition of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to ensure that licensed nurses accurately administered prescribed medication to one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 13). Findings included: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound judgement based on preparation, knowledge, skills, understanding and past experiences in nursing situations. The LPN participates in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of nursing care in settings where nursing takes place. 21.148 Standards of nursing conduct (a) A licensed practical nurse shall: (5) Document and maintain accurate records. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record and select facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to clinically justify the use of a foley (indwelling) catheter for two of 4 sampled residents with catheters (Resident 7 and 24). Findings include: Review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to have included dementia (is a term for a group of diseases and conditions that affect your thinking, memory, reasoning, personality, mood, and behavior), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and major depressive disorder (is a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A review of a hospital urology consult dated February 24, 2024, revealed that Resident 7 had a urinary tract infection (UTI - is a sudden and severe inflammation of kidney due to a bacterial infection) due to use of a Foley catheter (is a device that drains urine from the bladder into a collection bag outside of the body when an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an effective individualized person-centered plan to address a resident's dementia-related behavioral symptoms for one out of 13 residents reviewed (Resident 29). Findings include: A review of Resident 29's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease (progressive brain disorder that affects memory, thinking, and behavior) A review of Resident 29's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated May 2, 2024, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of progress notes in the resident's clinical record dated from February 01, 2024 to July 30, 2024, revealed that the resident exhibited behaviors of spitting, striking out, biting, and agitation. The resident's current care plan, in effect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from unnecessary psychoactive drugs by failing to ensure the presence of clinical rationale for the continued use of an as needed psychotropic medication for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 29). Findings include: A review of Resident 29's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease (progressive brain disorder that affects memory, thinking, and behavior) Review of Resident 29's clinical record revealed a physician's order for alprazolam (used to treat anxiety) tablet 0.25 MG give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for Anxiety with a start date of April 02, 2024, and no end date . Review of the June 2024 Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed that the medication (alprazolam) was administered to the resident four times during the month of June 2024. Review of the July 2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow-up with required dental services for one Medicaid payor source out of 13 residents sampled. (Resident 37). Findings include: Review of Resident 37's clinical record indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and that the resident's payor source was Medicaid. Review of Resident 37's clinical record revealed documentation dated May 9, 2024, at 6:04 PM, which indicated that the mobile dental services had been running behind and that it was now too late to come to facility for dental checks and resident's two extractions. Stated they would be calling the facility to reschedule the day that they would be in to complete. provided by the facility indicated that the resident was last seen by a dentist on October 26, 2022. A review of Oral Hygiene Consult Sheet dated May 16, 2024, indicated that the resident had no dental complaints. Recommendations included to continue care, brush daily,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with resident sand staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. Findings include: Observations during an environmental tour of the facility on April 16, 2024, at approximately 11:30 AM, down the service entrance hallway in the presence of the Director of Nursing, revealed that the doors to the kitchen, dry storage room, and mechanical room were open. Further observation revealed that the door from the mechanical room leading to the outside of the building was also open to the outside, providing a means of entry for pests. Observation of the dietary dry storage room revealed that there were mice droppings on the floor and on a pest glue trap located beneath a metal shelving unit on the right-hand side of the room. The facility's pest control company invoice/report dated March 6, 2024, failed to include information related to services provided and/or results of any inspection. Review of the facility's pest control company invoice/report dated April 3, 2024, indicated that service to all rooms and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Observations during a tour of the dry storage room was conducted with the Director of Nursing on April 16, 2024, at approximately 11:30 AM, revealed the following unsanitary practices with the potential to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards to the extent possible on one of three resident hallways (Rooms 9-16). Findings include: Observations made during an environmental tour of the facility on April 16, 2024, at approximately 11 AM revealed an unattended, and unlocked, treatment cart in the hallway of the resident unit. Further observation of the treatment cart revealed that the second drawer was open, exposing the contents of prescription creams and/or ointments. The sixth drawer was also open and exposed treatment supplies used to perform treatments to residents. Observation of the top of the cart revealed a laptop, and packages of unopened curettes (tool with a sharp blade to remove nonviable skin). Observation further revealed residents were ambulating and self-propelling in wheelchairs in the hallway while the opened cart was left unattended. Interview with the Director of Nursing revealed that the facility's wound care consultant was performing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records and select facility reports and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to assure that one resident out of six sampled was free from a significant medication error. (Resident 2). Findings include: A review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed that the resident had diagnoses that included dementia and hypertension. Further review of the resident's clinical record revealed that the resident required that her medications be crushed. A pharmacy consultant report dated October 24, 2023, identified that some of the resident's prescribed medications not recommended to be crushed per manufacturer guidelines. The pharmacist recommended changing Metoprolol succinate 25 mg (antihypertensive) to Metoprolol tartrate 12.5 mg two times a day (immediate release antihypertensive that may be crushed). The physician reviewed and accepted the pharmacist's recommendations on November 28, 2023. Review of a time sensitive pharmacy consultant report dated December 20, 2023, indicated that Resident 2 was receiving duplicate drug therapy. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, information submitted by the facility and the facility's abuse prohibition policy and staff interviews, it was revealed the facility failed to timely report an injury of unknown origin, a fractured arm, and the results of the facility's completed investigation into possible resident abuse or neglect within 5 working days of the incident to the State Survey agency for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled, Abuse, neglect and misappropriation, reviewed by the facility August 30, 2023, revealed that the facility will not tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property by anyone. Facility staff must immediately report all such allegations to the administrator/abuse coordinator. The administrator/abuse coordinator will immediately begin an investigation and notify the applicable and local and state agencies in accordance with the procedures in this policy. The time frame for investigation is notes as, the investigation must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy and procedures, facility provided documentation, and clinical records and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to timely and thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown source to rule out abuse, neglect or mistreatment for one of the four residents sampled (Resident 2). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled, Abuse, neglect and misappropriation, dated as reviewed August 30, 2023, revealed that the facility will not tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property by anyone. Facility staff must immediately report all such allegations to the administrator/abuse coordinator. The administrator/abuse coordinator will immediately begin an investigation and notify the applicable and local and state agencies in accordance with the procedures in this policy. The time frame for investigation is notes as, the investigation must be completed within 5 working days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility reports and employee personnel files, and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to assure that licensed and professional nursing staff possessed the necessary skills and competencies to accurately perform medication administration as prescribed to one resident out of four sampled (Resident 1). Findings included: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on September 24, 2022, with diagnoses, which included cerebral vascular disease ( a stroke) with left sided hemiparesis. A review of a facility investigation report dated September 9, 2023, at 6:30 P.M. revealed that a licensed nurse administered the wrong medications to Resident 1, which the resident identified prior to ingestion. Resident 1, who resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] W, notified staff of the error and pills were removed. Nursing staff then provided Resident 1 the correct medications. Resident 1 reported that I was given 8 pills…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| VOLPE, BENJAMIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2019 |
| WEISBERG, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2019 |
| NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2019 |
| SABER GOVERNANCE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2019 |
| SHG MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2019 |
| LUTCHKO, JENNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/22/2024 |
| SAKALAS, LORI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/06/2024 |
| CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2014 |
| KINGSTON SNF RE GROUP LLLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2024 |
| RKL LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/26/2023 |
| SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2014 |
| MANGINO, LOREN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/24/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $733K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395905. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.