No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kittanning Health & Rehab Center

120 Kittanning Care Drive, Kittanning, PA 16201 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 119 certified beds · (724) 545-2273 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026Resident-funds citations (F0568, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$130,873 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (97) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $130,873 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-09)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
186 Blaney Rd Ste A · (724) 543-3668 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Pharmacy2.9 mi
1 Franklin Village Mall
Grocery
25 Manor Dr · (724) 763-1363 · Call to confirm hours
Park
13126 US Route 422 · (724) 548-2898 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
13374 State Route 422 · (724) 548-1251

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.7%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.9%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.9%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.8%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.1%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.7%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.9%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.9%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.5%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine53.2%68.7%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.531.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.911.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.9%CMS range 25.6–54.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 6.6–18.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.63
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.04
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.65
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
62.6%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 97.2 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

29
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-09)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

97 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 84 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, documentation, observations, resident and staff interviews and state and federal guidance it was determined that the facility failed to implement COVID and Influenza monitoring, tracking, and testing in accordance with state and federal guidance for 95-101 residents from 11/29/24, through 1/15/25. The facility failed to adhere to state return to work guidance for staff. These failures placed all residents in the facility in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Review of the facility Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy dated 4/16/18, last revised 9/11/23, indicated it is the facility's policy to maintain an organized, effective facility-wide program designed to systemically prevent, identify, control and reduce the risk of acquiring and transmitting infections among employees, volunteers, visitors, and contract healthcare workers, to conduct surveillance of communicable disease and infectious outbreaks, and to monitor employee health. It was indicated employees must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documentation, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program by failing to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Pennsylvania Department of Health (PA DOH) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination during a COVID-19 outbreak. The facility failed to perform contact tracing and testing per PA DOH guidelines and cohorted (an infection prevention and control strategy of grouping residents together who are identified with the same organism to confine their care to one area and prevent contact and spread to other residents) residents who were positive for COVID-19 with residents who were not tested and did not have symptoms of COVID-19. This failure placed the facility in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for 35 of 47 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, resident interview, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of significant medication errors for two of six residents reviewed (Resident R31, and R53) which resulted in actual harm (a medication overdose that caused unresponsiveness and required the administration of Narcan- a medication used to reverse overdoses of opioids [pain medication with a high risk of addiction] that is administered via a nasal spray) for Resident R31.Findings include: Review of facility policy General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration dated 6/18/25, stated prior to administration of medication, facility should verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication, at the correct dose, at the correct route, at the correct rate, at the correct time, for the resident. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of eleven of 16 residents (Group Resident (GR)1, GR2, GR3, GR4, GR5, GR6, GR7, GR8, and GR9, R51, and R88). Findings Include: Review of Payroll Based Journal (PBJ- a mandatory reporting system for nursing homes in which staffing information is reported on a quarterly basis) dated 1/1/25, through 3/31/25, indicated that the facility has a one star rating out of five stars, and that they have excessively low weekend staffing. Review of PBJ dated 7/1/25 through 9/30/25, indicated that the facility has a one star rating out of five stars, and that they have excessively low weekend staffing. During an interview on 1/6/26, at 9:52 a.m. Resident R88 stated that he is supposed to get two showers a week, and that he requires two employees for him to get a shower. I don't always get a shower as they don't always…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that fit testing of NIOSH-approved N-95 masks (a respirator mask used to care for residents with suspected or confirmed Covid-19) was completed to care for residents with suspected or confirmed Covid-19 (an infectious disease caused by a virus) during an outbreak in order to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections during a COVID-19 outbreak from 12/29/25 through 1/9/26, and failed to properly monitor residents refrigerator temperatures for one of two residents (Resident R88). Findings include: A review of facility policy Respiratory Protection dated 6/18/25, indicated that it is designed to protect employees by establishing accepted practices for respirator use. The infection preventionist or designee is responsible for the implementation with training, oversight, medical evaluation procedures, annual review, and enforcement of the policy. Employees have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that equipment was in safe operating condition for two of two of the facilities crash carts (a cart that contains supplies in the event of an emergency), (Common Room and Memory Impaired Unit) and two of two Automated External Defibrillator (AED-a portable, electronic device designed to diagnose and treat life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias), (Common Room and Main Dining Room).Findings include:Review of facility Emergency Equipment Check policy dated [DATE], indicated the emergency equipment will be checked daily and items which are outdated or opened will be replaced. The cart will be re-stocked promptly after any use.During a review of facility provided document labeled Emergency Cart Daily Checklist of the facilities crash cart (common room) on [DATE], at 10:30 a.m. revealed missing signatures for [DATE], and [DATE].The Emergency Cart Daily Checklist indicated that if AED…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide quarterly resident trust fund statements for four of four sampled residents (Residents R11, R31, R80, and Residents R88). Findings include: The facility Resident fund management policy dated 6/10/25, indicated that quarterly statements are to be sent by corporate office and addresses are to be maintained in the resident fund management system. During a resident council group interview on 1/6/26, at 1:00 p.m. three out of nine residents voiced that the facility has not provided them with quarterly statements. Review of the facility trust fund account (resident funds account with current accounts open and holding resident monies) dated 1/6/25, indicated the following residents had active resident fund accounts: Residents R11, R31, R80, and Residents R88. Further review of facility business records and resident records for did not include evidence that the residents were provided quarterly statements. During an interview on 1/7/26, at 12:55 p.m. Business office manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, closed clinical records, resident fund account statements and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to convey resident funds and close accounts upon discharge within 30 days for three out of three closed resident records (Closed Resident records CR110, CR111, and CR112). Findings include: The facility Resident fund management policy dated [DATE], indicated that trust accounts for discharged or expired residents are to be closed and funds disbursed timely. Review of Closed Resident Record CR110's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Closed Resident Record CR110's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated [DATE], indicated he was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia (a condition characterized by memory loss and progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), depression (a state of consistent sadness and loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for three of five residents (Resident R13, R36, and R100).Findings include:Review of facility policy Oxygen Administration dated 6/18/25, indicated licensed clinicians with demonstrated competence will administer oxygen via specified route as ordered by physician.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/3/25, indicated diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of progressive lung disorders characterized by increasing breathlessness), asthma (condition where the airways narrow and swell), and dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). Section O Special Treatments, Procedure and Programs O0110, C1 Oxygen Therapy is marked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician response for medication regimen reviews (MRR) for four of six sampled resident records (Resident R2, R5, R9, and R71). Findings include: The facility Medication Regimen Review policy last reviewed 6/18/25, indicated that the drug regimen review of each resident is completed at least monthly by the consultant pharmacist and any irregularities are reported. Facility should encourage physician/prescriber or other responsible parties receiving the MRR and the Director of Nursing to act upon recommendation contained in MRR. For those issues that require physician/prescriber intervention, facility should encourage physician/prescriber to either accept and act upon the recommendations contained within the MRR or reject all or some of the recommendations and provide and explanations as to why recommendation was rejected. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program for three out of five personnel files reviewed (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E10, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E11, and LPN Employee E12).Findings include: Review of LPN Employee E10's personnel file indicated a date of hire on 10/2/23. Review of LPN Employee E10's personnel file did not include annual in-service training on Effective Communication, Resident Rights, Abuse, QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement), Infection Control, Compliance and Ethics, and Behavioral Health from 1/1/25 through 12/31/25. Review of NA Employee E11's personnel file indicated a date of hire on 7/1/23. Review of NA Employee E11's personnel file did not include annual in-service training on Effective Communication, Resident Rights, Abuse, Infection Control, Compliance and Ethics, and Behavioral Health from 1/1/25 through 12/31/25. Review of LPN Employee E12's personnel file indicated a date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine whether it was safe to self-administer medications for one of four residents (Resident R77).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Self-Administration of Medications dated 6/18/25, indicated facility should comply with policy with respect to resident self-administration of medications. The facility should assess and determine whether self-administration of medications is safe and clinically appropriate, based on the resident's functionality and health condition. Facility should ensure that orders for self-administration list the specific medications the resident may self-administer.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of resident R77's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/17/25, indicated the diagnoses of high blood pressure, Parkinson's disease (neuromuscular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician was appropriately notified of change in condition for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R99).Findings include: Review of the facility Resident Change in Condition policy dated 6/18/25, stated for physician and family will be notified as soon as the nurse had identified the change in condition and the resident is stable. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of resident R99's care plan dated 8/19/25, indicated to notify physician of any changes. Review of Resident R99's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/22/25, indicated diagnoses of dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), anxiety, and depression. Review of Resident R99's progress note dated 9/4/25, at 10:18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 84 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, facility documents, clinical records, incident investigations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from misappropriation of property for one of two residents (Resident R88).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Pennsylvania Resident Abuse dated 6/18/25, indicated that the facility will not tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property by anyone. Exploitation was defined as the unfair treatment or use of a resident or the taking of a selfish or unfair advantage of a resident for personal gain, through manipulation, intimidation, threats or coercion. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 88's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/12/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, thyroid disorder, and chronic pain. Review of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' medication regime was free from unnecessary psychotropic (a mind-altering medication) medication for two of five residents (Resident R2 and R9).Findings include:Review of facility Psychotropic Medication Use policy dated 6/18/25, indicated all medications used to treat behaviors must have a clinical indication to be used. As needed, medications shall be limited to 14 days and cannot be renewed unless the attending physician evaluates the resident for the appropriateness of that medication. The physician must document rationale for medication for more than 14 days.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/14/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, bipolar disorder (a mental condition marked by alternating periods of elation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of personnel files, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly screen an employee by failing to conduct a criminal background check prior to the start of employment for one of five personnel files reviewed (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E9).Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 6/18/25, indicated it is the policy of the Facility to undertake background checks of all employees and to retain on file applicable records or current employees regarding such checks. Review of the facility Payroll/Human Resources Coordinator job description indicated an essential function of the position is to ensure that pre-screening of employees is completed (license verification, exclusion checks, background checks, drug screen/physical as required). Maintain complete employee files with accurate and up-to-date information. Review of LPN Employee E9's personnel file revealed a hire date of 9/25/25. Review of the personnel file did not include a completed state criminal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical record, incident reports, reports submitted to the State, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to report an incident of neglect for two of five residents (Resident R71, and R88). Findings include: Review of facility Pennsylvania Resident Abuse policy dated 6/18/25, indicated all reports of resident abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the administrator, Director of nursing, and to the applicable state agency. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R71's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/8/25, indicated diagnoses of dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), Parkinson's Disease (a degenerative brain disease that affects muscle control, among other symptoms), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider, including bed hold policy for two of four residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R1 and R5). Findings include:Review of facility policy Discharge Planning dated 6/18/25, indicated transfers and discharges will meet requirements. The facility will take steps to ensure that the transfer or discharge is documented in the resident's medical record and necessary information is communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider.Review of facility policy Bed Hold Letter dated 6/18/25, indicated it is the policy of the facility to track bed hold days and notify appropriate parties via bed hold letter.Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and treatment as ordered by physician for one of three residents (Residents R71).Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), Parkinson's Disease (a degenerative brain disease that affects muscle control, among other symptoms), and depression. Review of Resident R71's care plan dated 4/22/25, indicated the resident has Parkinson's disease and to provide drug therapy per order. Review of Resident R71's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/8/25, indicated diagnoses were current. Review of Resident R71's Neurology after visit summary dated 11/19/25, revealed the resident was ordered to increase 20 mg (milligrams) entacapone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive resident-specific plan of care for a resident with limited mobility requiring equipment and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one of two residents (Resident R10). Review of facility policy Splint Issuance Policy dated 6/18/25, indicated that the patient splint schedule will be communicated to the multidisciplinary team and documented in the care plan. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 10's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/12/25, indicated diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), cerebral vascular accident (a loss of blood flow to the brain, which damages brain tissue). Review of Resident R10's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 9/5/25, to wear resting hand splint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical record, incident reports, reports submitted to the State, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision which resulted in a resident ingesting a skin cleanser for one of four residents (Resident R71).Findings include: Review of the facility Resident Incident and Accident Report policy dated 6/18/25, indicated an incident is any occurrence that is not consistent with routine care of a particular resident. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R71's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/8/25, indicated diagnoses of dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), Parkinson's Disease (a degenerative brain disease that affects muscle control, among other symptoms), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete record of pre and post dialysis assessments for one out of three sampled resident records (Resident R11). Findings include: The facility Hemodialysis care policy last reviewed 6/18/25, indicated that communications between the dialysis provider and the facility staff will occur before and after each dialysis appointment. Document the assessment in the dialysis communication tool. Review of Resident R11's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R11's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/5/25, indicated she had diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (a progressive heart disease affecting pumping action of the heart muscles impacting circulation, swelling and shortness of breath), diabetes (metabolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations at least once every 12 months for two of five nurse aide (NA) personnel records (NA Employees E11 and E19).Findings include: Review of NA Employee E11's personnel record indicated a hire date of 7/1/23. Review of NA Employee E11's personnel record failed to include an annual performance evaluation at least every 12 months as required. Review of NA Employee E19's personnel record indicated a hire date of 7/1/23. Review of NA Employee E19's personnel record failed to include an annual performance evaluation at least every 12 months as required. During an interview on 1/7/26, at 1:45 p.m. Regional Nurse Consultant Employee E1 confirmed that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations at least once every 12 months for two of five nurse aide personnel records (NA Employee E11 and E19). 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code: 201.19(2) Personnel records.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate behavioral health services to maintain the highest practicable well-being as required (Resident R99).Findings include: The facility Psychotropic Medication Use policy last reviewed 6/18/25, indicated the facility should involve the resident or the resident representative in the discussion of potential non-pharmacologic and medication interventions to address the management of behaviors and the involvement should be documented in the resident's medical record. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R99's active diagnoses revealed a history of suicidal ideations, dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), anxiety, and depression. Review of resident R99's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical documentation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient and timely social services to one of three residents reviewed (Resident R99).Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R99's active diagnoses revealed a history of suicidal ideations, dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), anxiety, and depression. Review of resident R99's care plan dated 8/21/25, revealed the resident has behavioral symptoms due to anxiety. Interventions included to monitor and report any adverse side effects of medications, assess if anxiety endangers the resident and/or, others and to intervene as necessary, and obtain a psych consult/psychosocial therapy. Resident R99 care plan failed to include suicidal ideations. Review of Resident R99's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for one of six residents (Resident R71).Finding include: The facility Medication Regimen Review (MRR) policy last reviewed 6/18/25, indicated that the drug regimen review of each resident is completed at least monthly by the consultant pharmacist and any irregularities are reported. Facility should encourage physician/prescriber or other responsible parties receiving the MRR and the Director of Nursing to act upon recommendation contained in MRR. For those issues that require physician/prescriber intervention, facility should encourage physician/prescriber to either accept and act upon the recommendations contained within the MRR or reject all or some of the recommendations and provide and explanations as to why recommendation was rejected.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R71 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medical records on each resident are complete and accurately documented for one of five residents (Resident R2). Findings include:Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/14/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, bipolar disorder (a mental condition marked by alternating periods of elation and depression), and wound infection.Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed physician orders for the following medications and failed to have a diagnosis for use of the medication:Tylenol (used to treat pain) 325 mg (milligram) every six hours - no diagnosis indicatedDocusate Sodium (used to treat constipation) 100 mg at bedtime - no diagnosis indicatedFamotidine (used to treat acid reflux) 20 mg daily - no diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all of the required committee members for two of four quarters (January 2025 through March 2025 and July 2025 through September 2025).Findings include: A review of the QAA Committee meeting sign-in sheets from the period of January 2025 through March 2025, did not reveal that the Medical Director or Infection Preventionist were in attendance. A review of the QAA Committee meeting sign-in sheets from the period of July 2025 through September 2025, did not reveal that the Director of Nursing or Infection Preventionist were in attendance. During an interview on 1/9/25 at 10:33 a.m. Regional Nurse Consultant Employee E1 confirmed that the facility failed to conduct QAA meetings at least quarterly with all of the required committee members as required. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code: 201.18(e)(1)(2)(3)(4) Management.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide accurate and timely documentation related to the COVID-19 (a respiratory disease) vaccine for two of five residents (Resident R83, and R95). Findings include:Review of facility policy Resident Vaccination dated 6/18/25, indicated that residents or their responsible party will be asked about prior vaccinations at admission. Prior doses of influenza, pneumococcal, COVID-19, and other vaccines will be documented in the immunization portal in the electronic health record. The Infection Preventionist will track resident immunizations and that vaccines are administered timely.Review of Resident R83's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R83's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/24/25, indicated diagnoses of depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of progressive lung disorders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, personnel files and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to conduct the minimum 12 hours of nurse aide (NA) training per year for one of five NA personnel records (NA Employee E11).Findings include: Review of NA Employee E11's personnel record indicated a hire date of 7/1/23. Review of NA Employee E11's personnel record revealed 4.67 hours of in-service education from 1/1/25 through 12/31/25. During an interview on 1/7/26, at 11:31 a.m. Regional Nurse Consultant Employee E1 confirmed that the facility failed to conduct the minimum 12 hours of nurse aide training per year for one of five NA personnel records (NA Employee E11). 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code: 201.20(a) Staff development.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, controlled medication shift reconciliation records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to promote accurate accounting of controlled medications on two of two medication carts reviewed (Unit One Medication Cart and Unti 2B Medication Cart) and failed to ensure accurate administration of medications, resulting in a medication error for one of five residents (Resident R1).Findings include:Review of facility policy Inventory Control of Controlled Substances dated 1/12/25, indicated facility should ensure that the incoming and outgoing nurses count all Schedule II controlled substances and other medications with a risk of abuse or diversion at the change of each shift or at least once daily and document the results on a Controlled Substance Count Verification/Shift Count Sheet. Review of facility policy General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration dated 1/12/25, indicated prior to administration of medication, facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of significant medication errors for two of three residents reviewed (Residents R1 and R2).Findings include: Review of facility policy General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration dated 1/12/25, indicated prior to administration of medication, facility staff should take all measures required by facility policy and applicable law, including but not limited to the following:Verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication, at the correct dose, at the correct route, at the correct rate, at the correct time, for the correct resident.Confirm that the MAR (Medication Administration Record) reflects the most recent medication orderDocument the administration of controlled substances in accordance with applicable law.Document necessary medication administration/treatment information (e.g., when medications are opened,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician was appropriately notified of missed medication doses for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Shortages/Unavailable Medications dated 1/12/25, indicated upon discovery that facility has an inadequate supply of a medication to administer to a resident, facility staff should immediately initiate action to obtain the medication from pharmacy. If the medication is unavailable from pharmacy or a third-party pharmacy, and cannot be supplied from the manufacturer, facility should obtain alternate physician/prescriber orders, as necessary. Review of facility policy Resident Change in Condition dated 1/12/25, indicated the physician/provider and resident/family/responsible party will be notified when there has been a need to alter the resident's medical treatment, including a change in provider orders. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medications as ordered by the physician for one of five residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Shortages/Unavailable Medications dated 1/12/25, indicated upon discovery that facility has an inadequate supply of a medication to administer to a resident, facility staff should immediately initiate action to obtain the medication from pharmacy. If the medication is unavailable from pharmacy or a third-party pharmacy, and cannot be supplied from the manufacturer, facility should obtain alternate physician/prescriber orders, as necessary. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/19/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, depression, and personal history of malignant neoplasm of prostate (prostate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of significant medication errors for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Shortages/Unavailable Medications dated 1/12/25, indicated upon discovery that facility has an inadequate supply of a medication to administer to a resident, facility staff should immediately initiate action to obtain the medication from pharmacy. If the medication is unavailable from pharmacy or a third-party pharmacy, and cannot be supplied from the manufacturer, facility should obtain alternate physician/prescriber orders, as necessary. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/19/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, depression, and personal history of malignant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to properly store, label and date food products in the Main Kitchen which created the potential for food borne illness. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Storge of Refrigerated Foods last reviewed 1/12/25, and previously reviewed 1/2/24, indicated that employee lunches shall not be stored in dietary refrigerators. During an observation in the Main Kitchen Back Reach-in Cooler, on 1/12/25, at 9:35 a.m. an opened bottle of Pepsi, and an opened bottle of Dr. Pepper were observed with no name, or date. During an observation in the Main Kitchen Walk-in Freezer, on 1/12/25, at 9:37 a.m. an opened bag of mixed vegetables and an opened package of sausage patties had no date or label. During an observation in the Main Kitchen Dry Storage, on 1/12/25, at 9:45 a.m. an opened bag of corn flake cereal, had no label or date. During an interview completed on 1/12/24, at 9:55 a.m. Food Service Director Employee E10 confirmed the above observations and that the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for three of three residents with facility-initiated transfers (Resident R21, R30, and R78). The findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/6/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, hip fracture, and malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients to the body). Review of Resident 21's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of Resident R21's clinical record revealed no documented evidence that the facility had communicated specific information to the receiving health care provider for the residents transferred and expected to return, which included the resident's care plan goals, advanced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for three of three resident hospital transfers or therapeutic leave of absence (Resident R21, R30 and R78). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Bed Hold Notice dated 1/12/25, and previously dated 1/2/24, indicated that the bed hold policy will be provided to residents at the time of transfer. In the case of an emergency, the paperwork should be provided within 24 hours. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/6/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, hip fracture, and malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients to the body). Review of Resident 21's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documentation that medication regimen reviews (MRR) were completed for three of three residents reviewed (Resident R4, R26, and R78). Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Regimen Review dated 1/2/24, last reviewed 1/12/25, indicated the consultant pharmacist will provide the resident's MRRs to facility identified personnel who will ensure that the attending physician, medical director, director of nursing and other necessary facility staff receive the recommendations. The attending physician should document in the residents' health record that the identified irregularity has been reviewed and what, if any, action has been taken to address it. The facility should maintain readily available copies of the consultant pharmacists reports on file in the facility, and as part of the resident's permanent health record. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R4 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications in two out of two medications carts (2B and Unit 1 Medication Carts) and failed to properly store a medication on one of two medication rooms (Unit Medication Room). Findings include: During an observation on [DATE], at 10:16 a.m. of the 2B Medication Cart the following insulin pens failed to be stored correctly: -Resident R1's Insulin Glargine pen (prefilled pen used to help control blood sugar, insulin levels, and digestion) was not stored in a bag. -Resident R54's Insulin Glargine pen was not stored in a bag. -Resident R81's Insulin Glargine pen was not stored in a bag. During an interview on [DATE], at 10:22 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E15 confirmed the facility failed store Resident R1, R54, and R81's insulin pen correctly. During an observation on [DATE], at 10:23 a.m. Unit one medication cart was observed unlocked and one bottle of 81 milligram (mg) of aspirin and one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medical records on each resident are complete and accurately documented for three of four residents (Resident R21, R87, and R199) Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/6/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, hip fracture, and malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients to the body). Review of Resident R21's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 10/31/24, for nifedipine (a drug used to treat high blood pressure or chest pain). Review of this order for Resident R21 did not include a diagnosis for use of this drug. Review of Resident R87's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility 11/15/24. A review of Resident R87's MDS dated [DATE], included diagnoses of high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain call bells were in reach for one of six residents as required (Resident R4). Findings include: The facility policy Call Lights dated 2/24/23, last reviewed 1/2/24, indicated it is the policy of the facility to provide residents with a means of communicating with staff. A call system is installed in each resident room. The facility responds to residents needs and requests. Review of Resident R4's clinical record indicated admission to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/28/24, indicated diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure) polyneuropathy (disease that affects many nerves in the body) and depression. Review of Resident R4's care plan dated 1/17/24, indicated the resident was at risk for falling due to poor safety awareness. It was indicated to keep the call light in reach at all times.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the opportunity to formulate an advance directive (a written instruction such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care for when the individual is incapacitated) for one of two residents (Resident R87). Findings include: A review of the facility Resident Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives dated 1/12/25, and previously dated 1/2/24, indicated that Advance Directives will be discussed with resident or their representative to determine if any Advance Directives have been chosen or of the resident has any questions. Review of Resident R87's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility 11/15/24. A review of Resident R87's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/21/24, included diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and morbid obesity due to excess calories. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and home-like environment for one of three sampled residents (Resident R47). Findings include: During observations on 1/14/25, at 9:54 a.m. Resident R47's bed was found with red substance on his sheets and red substance on the floor next to his bed. During an interview on 1/14/25, at 9:55 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E4 confirmed that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and home-like environment for Resident R47 as required. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3) Management

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, reports submitted to the State, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse in the required timeframe one of four residents (Resident R80). Findings include: Review of facility policy Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 1/2/24, last reviewed 1/12/25, indicated all allegations of abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property must be reported immediately to the Administrator, Director of Nursing, and to the applicable State Agency. All serious incidents involving a resident will be reported to the Department of Health (State Agency) field office within 24 hours. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R80's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/22/24, indicated diagnoses of anemia (too little iron in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one of three residents (Resident R30). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated the following instructions: - O0110K1, Hospice care: code residents identified as being in a hospice program for terminally ill persons where an array of services is provided for the palliation and management of terminal illness and related conditions. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R30's MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated and revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of four residents (Resident R4). Findings include: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Planning dated 1/2/24 indicated the resident care conference meets as scheduled to discuss each resident, review the previous care plan and to finalize the development of the current care plan. Adjustments are made by the interdisciplinary team to ensure that all programs and identified category of needs are addressed and that the plan is oriented toward preventing a decline in functioning. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/29/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, Bipolar Disorder (a mental condition marked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy and documents, resident interviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for four of five weeks (12/10/24 through 12/21/24, and 12/26/24 through 1/16/25). Findings include: Review of facility policy Activities dated 1/12/25, and previously dated 1/2/24, indicated the facility is to provide an ongoing resident-centered Life Enrichment Program, based on comprehensive assessments and care plans will be provided. The program will be designed to meet the interests (including hobbies and cultural preferences) and the abilities of each resident including as their physical; mental; emotional; social; spiritual; psychosocial and leisure needs. The program will create opportunities for each resident to have a meaningful life by supporting his/her domains of wellness (security, autonomy, growth, connectedness, identity, joy, and meaning). The choices, previous positive lifestyles, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and ensure proper treatment of resident wounds and complete weekly skin assessments for two of four (Resident R4, and Resident R199). Findings include: Review of facility policy Skin and Wound Care Best Practices dated 1/2/24, and last reviewed 1/12/25, indicated the licensed nurses will complete a Weekly Skin Check. This review is in addition to the nursing assistant's shower sheet skin reviews. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/29/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, Bipolar Disorder (a mental condition marked by alternating periods of elation and depression), and dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). Review of a progress note dated 4/11/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents received proper treatment and monitoring for pressure ulcers for two of three sampled residents (Residents R1 and R199). The facility Pressure injury prevention and treatment policy dated 1/2/24, and last reviewed 1/12/25, indicated that residents will be assessed for pressure injury risk on admission. Monitoring will be at least weekly, and an evaluation of the pressure ulcer/pressure injury will be documented. All assessments will include location/stage, size, pain, wound bed and appearance. Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/7/24, indicated that she had diagnoses that included Peripheral vascular disease (PVD-a progressive narrowing of the blood vessels impacting blood flow to the limbs),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, resident interview, review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess residents for smoking safety for one of two residents (Resident R52). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Smoking dated 1/12/25, and previously dated 1/2/24, indicated that during the admission process, nursing will ask residents if they smoke or have a desire/intent to smoke while in the facility. Anyone answering yes is further assessed for smoking safety awareness and the need for reasonable physical or safety accommodations. The assessment is completed thereafter on readmission, quarterly, and with any significant change in the resident's condition. Review of the facility Smoking List, provided on 1/12/25, indicated that Resident R52 was a current smoker. Review of clinical record revealed that Resident R52 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R52's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, facility policy and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of one resident receiving hemodialysis (Resident R45). Findings include: A review of the facility Hemodialysis Care Policy dated 8/24/23, reviewed 1/12/25, indicated medications will be administered as ordered by the provider. A review of the facility Resident Change in Condition Policy dated 6/27/24, indicated the licensed nurse will recognize and intervene in the event of a change in resident condition. The physician will be notified as soon as the nurse identified the change in condition and the resident is stable. The physician must be notified when there is a significant change in the resident's physician condition. A review of Resident R45's clinical record indicated the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician visits were conducted at least every 60 days after the first 90 days of admission for one of nine residents reviewed (Residents R86) and failed to ensure a physician completed the initial visit for one of nine residents (Resident R201). Findings include: Review of Resident R86's clinical record indicated admission to the facility on 2/7/24. Review of Resident R86's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/13/24, indicated diagnoses of stroke (occurs when the supply of blood to the brain is reduced or blocked completely, which prevents brain tissue from getting oxygen and nutrients.) hypertension (high blood pressure) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident 86's clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that Resident R86 was seen by a physician or physician delegate for 232 days between 2/7/24, and 9/25/24. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, controlled drug shift count record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement pharmacy procedures for the reconciliation of controlled drugs for one of three closed record residents reviewed (Closed Record (CR) Resident R96). Findings include: Review of facility policy Disposal/Destruction of Expired or Discontinued Medication dated [DATE], last reviewed [DATE], indicated destruction of controlled mediations should be documented on the controlled medication count sheet and signed by the registered nurse and witnessing licensed professional. Discontinued and unused medications of discharged or deceased residents shall be immediately removed from the medication cart and brought to nursing supervisory staff. Review of the clinical record indicated CR Resident R96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of CR Resident R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policies, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain resident medication regimens were free from potentially unnecessary medications for two of four residents (Residents R4 and R78) and failed to identify a diagnosed specific condition for treatment for one of four residents receiving psychotropic medications (Resident R78). Findings include: Review of facility policy Psychotropic Medication Use dated 1/2/24, last reviewed 1/12/25, indicated psychotropic medications are drugs that affect mood, perception, or behavior, and include but are not limited to antipsychotics, anxiolytics, antidepressants, mood stabilizers or hypnotics. Psychotropic medications should only be prescribed to treat specific conditions as diagnosed and documented in the medical record. Review of facility policy Medication Regimen Review dated 1/2/24, last reviewed 1/12/25, indicated the consultant pharmacist will provide the resident's MRRs to facility identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent for two of five residents (Resident R24, and R47). Findings include: The facility's medication error rate was 6.67% (percent) based on 30 medication opportunities with two medication errors. Observation of a medication administration pass on 1/14/25, at 9:40 a.m. revealed Registered Nurse (LPN), Employee E4, failed to administer Resident R47's 305-700mg Potassium phosphate (medication used to make the urine more acidic, preventing kidney stones, as well as odor and rash) timely. Resident R47's medication was scheduled to be administered at 8:00 a.m. LPN, Employee E4 confirmed Resident R47's medication was late. Observation of a medication administration pass on 1/16/25, at 9:26 a.m. revealed LPN, Employee E1, failed to administer Resident R24's Adult 50 Plus 300mcg-250mcg multivitamin. LPN, Employee E15 confirmed the medication was not in stock and not administered as ordered. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to obtain a diagnosis, and order for hospice services and to ensure the coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the needs of each resident for end-of-life care for one of three residents (Resident R46). Findings include: Review of the facility Hospice Care Policy dated 5/24/23, and last reviewed 1/12/25, indicated the community provides hospice services through collaboration with a Medicare certified hospice agency when ordered by the resident's physician. Such services will be provided to meet professional standards and be provided timely. The facility will ensure the resident's written plan of care includes both the most recent hospice plan of care and description of the services furnished by the facility to attain and maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. The physician certification and recertification of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all the required committee members for one of four quarters (January 2024 through March 2024). Findings include: Review of facility policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program Policy dated 1/2/24, last reviewed 1/12/25, indicated the facility will maintain a QAPI Committee consisting, at a minimum of, the Administrator, the Director of Nursing Services, the Medical Director or his/her designee, the designated Infection Preventionist, Direct Care staff on a rotating basis, staff from ancillary departments on a rotating basis, and at least two other members of facility staff. A review of the QAPI Committee meeting sign-in sheets from the period of January 2024 through March 2024, did not reveal that the Nursing Home Administrator was in attendance. During an interview on 1/16/25 at 2:08 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop care plans that included instructions to provide person centered care for bed mobility for three of four residents (Resident R2, R3, and R4). Findings include: Review of the facility Comprehensive Care Planning Policy last reviewed 1/2/24, indicated the facility must develop a comprehensive person centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental, and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessments. Review of Resident R2's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of anxiety, cerebral infarction (occurs when the blood supply to part of the brain is blocked or reduced), and mild intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate assistance for bed mobility for one of four residents (Resident R1), which resulted in the resident falling out of bed and sustaining a 1.5 centimeter laceration to the upper cheekbone. Findings include: Review of the facility Fall Prevention and Management Policy dated 12/9/19, last revised 8/6/24, indicated residents are assessed for fall risk upon admission, quarterly, and as needed. It was indicated if risks are identified, preventive measure will be put in place and care planned. Review of the facility Comprehensive Care Planning Policy last reviewed 1/2/24, indicated the facility must develop a comprehensive person centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental, and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessments. Review of Resident R1's admission record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident interviews, resident representative concern, and facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment on two of three nursing units (Unit 1 and Unit 2). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Occupied Resident Room Cleaning Procedure dated 1/2/24, indicated that proper cleaning and disinfecting of environmental surfaces is necessary to break the chain of infection. Cleaning refers to the removal of visible soil from surfaces through the physical action of scrubbing with detergents/surfactants and rinsing with water. This step is to reduce the volume of organisms on a surface and remove foreign material that could interfere with disinfection. Occupied resident rooms will be cleaned daily to maintain a sanitary environment. Review of facility document Concern Form, dated 10/9/24, indicated that Resident R5 stated that her Room is filthy and needs cleaned. Review of facility document Concern Form, dated 10/11/2, indicated that Resident R1 stated that no one from housekeeping has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident grievances for 90 days, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to effectively resolve and provide responses to residents and/or their responsible parties in a timely manner in relation to concerns documented via Grievance procedure and complete the reports in their entirety for four of seven grievances reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Grievances and Concerns Policy dated 1/2/24, indicated upon receipt of an oral, written, or anonymous grievance submitted by a resident, the Grievance Official will take immediate action to prevent further potential violations of any resident right while the alleged violation is being investigated, if indicated. The grievance review will be completed in a reasonable timeframe consistent with the type of grievance (e.g., a concern regarding resident conduct will be addressed more quickly than a concern that involves activity programming or meals), but in no event will the review exceed thirty (30) days. If the Grievance Committee/Grievance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to ensure a complete and thorough investigation of an allegation of neglect for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 1/2/24, indicated it is the facility's policy to investigate all allegations, suspicions and incidents of abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, intimidation, exploitation or residents, misappropriation of resident property and injuries of unknown source. If a staff member is accused or suspected of abuse the facility immediately remove staff member from resident care area and request a written statement from accused staff member. The person investigating the incident should interview the resident, the accused, and all witnesses and obtain written statements from the resident, if possible, the accused, and each witness. Evidence of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, reports submitted to the State, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect in the required timeframe one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 1/2/24, indicated neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. All allegations of abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property must be reported immediately to the Administrator, Director of Nursing, and to the applicable State Agency. All serious incidents involving a resident will be reported to the Department of Health (State Agency) field office within 24 hours. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of neglect for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 1/2/24, indicated it is the facility's policy to investigate all allegations, suspicions and incidents of abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, intimidation, exploitation or residents, misappropriation of resident property and injuries of unknown source. If a staff member is accused or suspected of abuse the facility immediately remove staff member from resident care area and request a written statement from accused staff member. The person investigating the incident should interview the resident, the accused, and all witnesses and obtain written statements from the resident, if possible, the accused, and each witness. Evidence of the investigation should be documented. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, facility documents, a resident interview, resident representative concern, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food products that appeared palatable for two meals. (Lunch 8/18/24, and Breakfast 10/1/24) Findings include: Review of facility policy Dining Experience at Mealtimes, dated 1/2/24, indicated that the facility will provide attractive, nourishing, and palatable meals. Review of facility document Concern Form, dated 8/18/24, indicated that Resident R2 had received burnt ham on lunch tray on 8/18/24, and Ham was black and tough. Review of a Resident Representative Concern dated 10/17/24, stated They served him burnt ham. It was ground up with black chunks in it and the lady across the hall was yelling about her food being burnt too. Review of facility document Concern Form, dated 10/1/24, indicated that Resident R3 stated that sausage on her breakfast tray on 10/1/24, was burnt. During an interview on 10/24/24, at 12:55 p.m. Resident R3 confirmed that she had made a complaint regarding burnt sausage and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed effectively manage the facility to prevent the development and transmission of a communicable infection. Findings include: The job description for the Nursing Home Administrator specified the primary purpose of the job is to lead, direct, and manage the overall operations of the community in accordance with policies and procedures and current federal, state and local standards, guidelines and regulations that govern the community and to ensure the highest degree of quality care is maintained for each resident at all times. The job description for the Director of Nursing specified it is the responsibility of the DON to organize, develop, manage, and direct the overall operations of the Nursing Service Department in accordance with current federal, state and local standards, guidelines and regulations that govern the community. The DON is to work directly with the NHA and the Medical Director to ensure the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate the call bell needs for one of five residents (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Communication System and Call Light Policy dated 1/2/24, indicated when the resident is in bed or confined to a chair, be sure the call light is within easy reach. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]/24. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/6/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, anemia (too little iron in the blood), and Parkinson's disease (neuromuscular disorder causing tremors and difficulty walking). During an observation on 9/11/24, at 11:14 a.m. Resident R2 was observed sitting on the edge of her bed. During this observation, Resident R2 stated, I'm not supposed to get up on my own, but how do they expect me to call for help when my call bell is on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the family of a change in condition in a timely manner for one of three residents (Resident R37). Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Change in Condition, dated 1/2/24, indicated that the physician and Resident/Family/ Responsible Party will be notified when there has been a significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental conditions, and a need to alter the resident's medical treatment, including a change in provider orders. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 37's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/27/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and chronic pain syndrome. Review of a Resident Representative concern dated 9/4/24, indicated that the Resident Representative was granted guardianship of Resident R37.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to meet resident care needs for one of three residents (Resident R38). Findings include: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Planning dated 1/2/24, indicated that the facility must develop a comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Review of Resident R38's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/7/24, included diagnoses of bipolar disorder (a mental condition marked by alternating periods of elation and depression), schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech and behavior), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, facility tour, resident interview, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in an elopement (leaving an area without permission) for one of 11 residents (Resident R38). Findings include: Review of facility policy Elopement/Unauthorized Absence last reviewed 8/2/24, indicated that the facility will identify residents with potential and/or actual risk factors for elopement and protect the resident through development and implementation of safety interventions. In the event of a resident elopement the facility will implement its policies and procedures promptly to locate the resident in a timely manner. All residents will be assessed for the risk of elopement using the Elopement Observation on admission, quarterly, and as needed. Residents identified at risk will have interventions promptly implemented to reduce the risk of elopement. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide accurate and timely documentation related to offering the influenza vaccination for one of five residents (Resident R36). Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Vaccination Policy dated 1/2/24, indicated influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID vaccination will be administered per provided orders. Consents/refusals/medical ineligibility will be documented in the electronic health record. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R36's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/25/24, indicated active diagnoses of anemia (too little iron in the body), pneumonia (lung inflammation caused by bacteria or a viral infection), and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech and behavior). Section O0250 Influenza Vaccine indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — isolated
    Report COVID19 data to residents and families.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to notify families of residents with positive COVID-19 (a contagious disease caused by a virus) test results in a timely manner for two of five COVID-19 positive residents (Residents R3, and R37.) Findings include: Review of the facility policy Guidance in Managing Respiratory Illnesses and Outbreaks dated 1/2/24, indicated that that upon identifying that residents have developed COVID-19, that the facility should notify residents and families. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R3 Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident's care needs) dated 6/19/24, revealed diagnoses of high blood pressure, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and iron deficiency anemia (when blood does not have enough healthy red blood cells to carry oxygen throughout the body as a result of not enough iron). Review of Resident R3's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide accurate and timely documentation related to offering the COVID-19 vaccination for one of five residents (Resident R36). Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Vaccination Policy dated 1/2/24, indicated influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID vaccination will be administered per provided orders. Consents/refusals/medical ineligibility will be documented in the electronic health record. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R36's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/25/24, indicated active diagnoses of anemia (too little iron in the body), pneumonia (lung inflammation caused by bacteria or a viral infection), and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech and behavior). Review of Resident R36's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to ensure a complete and thorough investigation of an allegation of verbal abuse for four of four residents (Residents R2, R3, R4, and R5). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 1/2/24, indicated it is the facility's policy to investigate all allegations, suspicions and incidents of abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, intimidation, exploitation or residents, misappropriation of resident property and injuries of unknown source. If a staff member is accused or suspected of abuse the facility immediately remove staff member from resident care area and request a written statement from accused staff member. The person investigating the incident should interview the resident, the accused, and all witnesses and obtain written statements from the resident, if possible, the accused, and each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of verbal abuse for four of four residents (Residents R2, R3, R4, and R5). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 1/2/24, indicated it is the facility's policy to investigate all allegations, suspicions and incidents of abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, intimidation, exploitation or residents, misappropriation of resident property and injuries of unknown source. If a staff member is accused or suspected of abuse the facility immediately remove staff member from resident care area and request a written statement from accused staff member. The person investigating the incident should interview the resident, the accused, and all witnesses and obtain written statements from the resident, if possible, the accused, and each witness. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated and revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of five residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Planning dated 1/2/24 indicated the resident care conference meets as scheduled to discuss each resident, review the previous care plan and to finalize the development of the current care plan. Adjustments are made by the interdisciplinary team to ensure that all programs and identified category of needs are addressed and that the plan is oriented toward preventing a decline in functioning. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/13/24, indicated diagnoses of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA - damage to the brain from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with an enteral feeding tube (a tube inserted in the stomach through the abdomen) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of American Society for Parental and Enteral Nutrition's (ASPEN) Nutrition Support Dietetics indicated confirmation of proper placement of tube should be performed via abdominal and chest x-ray. The placement of enteral devices should be performed or supervised by a physician proficient in such placement. Percutaneous enterostomy (gastrostomy or jejunostomy) tubes must be placed by a physician or under the guidance of a physician; subsequent replacement may be done by a health care professional or patient/caregiver proficient in such placement, as designated by the physician. Review of facility policy Enteral Nutrition dated 1/2/24, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations of resident areas and nursing units, resident council interview and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain anonymous grievance forms were readily accessible for residents use throughout the facility for three out of three nursing units (100 unit, 200 unit, the Memory Impaired Unit). Findings include: The facility Resident grievance and concern policy dated 8/2018, and last reviewed 1/2/24, indicated that the facility recognizes that the residents have the right to voice grievances. Residents have the right to file a grievance anonymously. During a resident council group interview interview on 2/6/24, at 10:28 a.m. five out of six residents stated that they did not know how to complete an anonymous grievance form or where the forms would be located. During a tour with Maintenance Director Employee E8 on 2/6/24, at 11:19 a.m. the 100 unit common areas were observed without anonymous grievance forms available. During a tour with Maintenance Director Employee E8 on 2/6/24, at 11:21 a.m. the Memory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-08 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policies, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient dietary staff to perform essential clinical duties for three out of 12 months. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Nutritionally High Risk resident Documentation, dated 7/20/21, and last reviewed 1/2/24, indicated that dietitians will review resident nutritional status and document monthly for nutritionally high risk residents. High risk residents include those with significant weight loss, pressure injury, and those using enteral nutrition (nutrition provided via a tube inserted into the intestines- used for people who cannot take food by mouth). Review of Dietitian's job description revealed that the dietitian will: · Monitor nutritional status of residents through the RAI assessment process (a means of ensuring that residents receive the highest quality of care and can maintain the highest quality of life) as assigned. · Assess resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, plans of correction, and the results of the current and former surveys, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and make certain that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: Review of the facility policy QAPI (quality Assessment/Performance Improvement) Plan, dated 1/2/24, indicated that the facility's vision is to focus on our goals and aspirations. It is the framework for our efforts to improve processes and care. A data review will be performed annually. Data may include, but is not limited to grievance logs, medical record review, skilled care claims, fall/incident and accident log, pressure ulcer lists, staffing trends, medication error reports and quality measures, survey outcomes. The facility's deficiencies and plans of correction for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending 1/20/23, revealed that the facility would maintain compliance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, resident council interview, and staff interview, it was determine that the facility failed to provide an active director for the Activities department for three out of 12 months (November 2023, December 2023, and January 2023). Findings include: The facility Life Enrichment program policy dated 5/4/23, last reviewed 1/2/24, indicated that an ongoing, resident-centered life enrichment program will be provided. The program will be designed to meet the interest and the abilities of each resident. The life enrichment director will involve residents in all aspects of program delivery and incorporate the resident's express interest. Review of Department staff listing on 2/5/24, indicated no assigned Activity Director personnel. Review of the February 2024 Activity calendar indicated a scheduled activity (balloon toss) for the residents on the locked dementia unit scheduled for 2/5/24, at 1:30 p.m. During an interview on 2/5/24, at 10:48 a.m. Activity assistant Employee E9 stated that there was not an Activities Director and she was the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to label/date opened medications on three of three medication carts (Medication Cart A, Medication Cart B, and the Memory Impaired Unit (MIU) Medication Cart). The facility failed to make certain that out-of-date medications were disposed of on one of three medication carts (Medication Cart B). The facility failed to secure controlled substances stored in the refrigerator utilizing double locks in one of two medication rooms (Unit 2A/2B Medication Room). Findings include: Review of facility policy Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals reviewed on 1/2/24, indicate that Facility staff should record the date opened on the primary medication container (vial, bottle, inhaler) when the medication has a shortened expiration date once opened. If a multi-dose vial of an injectable medication has been opened or accessed the vial should be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacture specifies a different date for that opened vial. When an ophthalmic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all of the required committee members for one of four quarterly meeting (October 2023 through December 2023). Findings Include: The facility Quality Assurance and performance improvement program policy dated 3/17/23, and last reviewed on 1/2/24, indicated that the facility will maintain a QAPI committee consisting of the administrator, Director of nursing, Medical director, infection preventionist. The committee will meet on a regular basis, at least quarterly, to coordinate and evluate activities. Review of Quality assurance and performance improvement sign in sheets and attendance records from January 2023 through January 2024 did not include sign in documentation for meetings from October 2023 through December 2023. Additional review of documentation did not show evidence of the last quarterly meeting taking place. During an interview on 2/8/24, at 11:38 a.m. the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement measures to prevent the potential for cross contamination during a dressing change for one of three residents (Resident R238) and the facility failed to implement an infection control program that included a system of surveillance to identify possible communicable diseases or infections for five of 12 months (May 2023, June 2023, August 2023, September 2023, and October 2023). Findings include: Review of facility policy Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 1/2/24, indicated the particular focus of the program will be on conducting risk assessment, surveillance, reducing healthcare associated infections, limiting transmission of disease, immunization, promoting antibiotic stewardship, and reporting as necessary. It is our policy to maintain an organized, effective facility-wide program to systematically prevent, identify, control, and reduce the risk of acquiring and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's infection control policies and procedures and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for five of twelve months (May 2023, June 2023, August 2023, September 2023, and October 2023). Findings include: Review of facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship Program dated 1/2/24, indicated as a component of the monthly Infection Prevention and Control Committee (IPCC) meeting the facility's use of antibiotics will be reviewed to include: monitoring/tracking of antibiotic prescribing, use, and resistance in order to promote a culture of optimal antibiotic use within the facility. The facility will review antibiotic utilization reports monthly from the Pharmacy that include type of drug prescribed (antibiotic name), number of days of treatment, and number of new starts of antibiotics. Review of the facility's Infection Control surveillance for February 2023, through January 2024, failed to include documentation to indicate that antibiotic monitoring was completed for May 2023, June 2023, August…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for one of three sampled resident records (Closed Resident Record CR7) Findings include: The facility Medicare cut-letter policy dated 8/24/23, indicated that the facility will assure all residents receive timely and appropriate notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for services in accordance with State and Federal guidelines. Review of Closed Resident Record CR7's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking, and interferes with daily life), hypertension (a condition impacting blood circulation through the heart related to poor pressure), and hyperlipidemia (elevated lipid levels within the blood). Review of Closed Resident Record CR7's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/1/23, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, resident council interview, and staff interview, it was determine that the facility failed to provide scheduled activities on one of three nursing units (Memory impaired unit-MIU). Findings include: The facility Life Enrichment program policy dated 5/4/23, last reviewed 1/2/24, indicated that an ongoing, resident-centered life enrichment program will be provided. The program will be designed to meet the interest and the abilities of each resident. Review of the February 2024 Activity calendar indicated a scheduled activity (balloon toss) for the residents on the locked dementia unit scheduled for 2/5/24, at 1:30 p.m. The scheduled activity for 2/6/24 at 1:30 p.m. was bowling. During an interview on 2/5/24, at 10:48 a.m. Activity assistant Employee E9 stated that there is no Activities Director and she is the only activity staff in the facility since October 2023. During observations on 2/5/24, at 1:40 p.m. the locked dementia unit was found with five residents (Residents R60, R23, R52, R63; and Resident R14) sitting in the common…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of increased and decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels and failed to assess residents for hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and hypoglycemia (low blood glucose) for one of three residents (Resident R13). Findings include: Review of facility policy Hypoglycemia Policy dated 1/2/24, indicated nursing personnel are responsible for recognizing signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia and responding accordingly. A blood glucose of 60 milligrams (mg) or less indicates the need for intervention. Give glucose gel (a medication used to raise blood sugar levels) if resident can tolerate oral intake. Repeat blood sugar every 15 minutes. Notify provider as soon as practicably possible. Document in medical record as appropriate. The Centers for Disease Control defines diabetes as: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic (long-lasting) health condition that affects how your body turns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that appropriate treatment and services were provided for one of three residents with a urinary catheter (Resident R71). Findings include: Review of facility policy Indwelling Urinary Catheter Care Procedure dated 1/2/24, indicated clinical staff with demonstrated competence may provide urinary catheter care. Such care will help to prevent catheter association urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) and prolong the life of the catheter system. Staff will check drainage tubing and bag to ensure that the catheter is draining properly, and no kinks are present. The urinary drainage bag must be placed below the bladder level but not on the floor. Ensure drainage bag is covered with privacy/dignity cover. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R71's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that weights were monitored, and that weight loss was identified and addressed in a timely manner for two of five residents (Resident R21, and R38). Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Weight, dated May 2015 and last reviewed 1/2/24, indicated that weights will be obtained routinely in order to monitor nutritional health over time. Each resident's weight will be determined upon admission/readmission to the facility, weekly for the first four weeks after admission/readmission, and monthly or more often if risk is identified, or as ordered. Review of the facility policy Nutritionally High Risk resident Documentation, dated 7/20/21, and last reviewed 1/2/24, indicated that dietitians will review resident nutritional status and document monthly for nutritionally high risk residents. High risk residents include those with significant weight loss, pressure injury,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who were receiving enteral feedings (nutrition through a tube) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications for one of three residents (Resident R71). Findings include: Review of facility policy Enteral Nutrition last reviewed 1/2/24, indicated licensed clinicians with demonstrated competence may administer enteral feedings and provide tube/site care. Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.25(g) indicated an enteral feeding tube may be associated with significant complications, including aspiration (when food or liquid goes into the airway instead of stomach). Aspiration risk may potentially be affected by factors such as diminished level of consciousness and improper positioning of the resident during administration of the feeding. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R71 was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain ongoing communication with the dialysis (a machine filters wastes, salts, and fluid from your blood when your kidneys are no longer healthy enough to do this work adequately) center for one of one residents receiving dialysis (Resident R39). Findings include: Review of facility policy Hemodialysis Care dated 1/5/23, last reviewed 1/2/24, indicated communication between the dialysis provider and the facility staff will occur before and after each hemodialysis treatment and as needed. Document assessment in the Dialysis Communication Tool. Assessment includes vital signs, pre-treatment weight, medications administered before treatment, time of last meal, fluid intake, and any additional alerts or information. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R39's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect one of five residents (Resident R1) from neglect who was left unassessed after identification of a change in condition. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 8/30/23, indicated that neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers, to provide goods and services to a resident to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Review of the facility policy Resident Change in Condition, reviewed 12/6/23, and previously reviewed 1/6/23, indicated that the licensed nurse will recognize and intervene in the event of a change in resident condition. The nurse will address any emergency care required given the situation and then gather information prior to contacting the physician. The following should be included: current vital signs (blood pressure, temperature, pulse, respirations, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, documents, and clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents were free from physical abuse, and verbal abuse for four of 74 residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, and R4). This has been identified as past noncompliance. Findings include: The facility's policy Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 1/5/23, abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking, it also includes controlling behavior through corporal punishment. Verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents. Examples of verbal abuse include but are not limited to threats of harm and saying things to frighten a resident. During an interview on 10/11/23, at 11:00 a.m., Social Worker Employee E1 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to investigate allegations of physical and verbal abuse for three of 74 residents (Resident R1, R2, and R3). This has been identified as past noncompliance. Findings include: Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 1/5/23, stated that it is the facility ' s policy to investigate all allegations, suspicions, and incidents of abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, intimidation, exploitation of residents, misappropriation of resident property and injuries of unknown source. Facility staff must immediately report all such allegations to the Administrator/Abuse Coordinator. The Administrator/Abuse Coordinator will immediately begin an investigation. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Physical abuse includes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • No harm found · C2026-01-09 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that current and accurate nurse staffing information was available at the beginning of each shift.Findings include: An observation on 1/8/26, at 1:12 p.m. revealed the nurse staffing information was posted near the facility's main entrance and was dated 1/3/26. During the observation, the nurse staffing information had the incorrect date and resident census, and the staffing hours did not accurately reflect the current total number of hours worked for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for nursing care per shift. During an interview on 1/8/26, at 1:22 p.m. Regional Nurse Consultant Employee E1 confirmed that the facility failed to post the required current facility information for staffing hours and the census for 1/8/26. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b) Management.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$130,873 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $45,325 — penalty dated 2026-01-09
  • $71,505 — penalty dated 2025-01-16
  • $14,043 — penalty dated 2024-09-16
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-12 for 49 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Bryn Mawr Extended Care CenterBryn Mawr, PA 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, PA 1 of 5Gastonia Health & Rehab CenterGastonia, NC 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab CenterJohnstown, PA 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazleton, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5University Manor Health & RehaCleveland, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Health & Rehab CenterMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MadisonMadison, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MechanicsvilleMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
JEFFERYS, APRILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/30/2024
MEENAN, CODYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2025
BENJAMIN N. VOLPE FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED DECEMBER 29, 2020)OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
BNV DYNASTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
DECANTED WILLIAM I. WEISBERG FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST (DATED SEPT 30, 2020OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
KITTANNING RE GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
RKL LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
WESTERN PA MT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/07/2025
WIW DYNASTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
THIMONS, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/22/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$770K
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 85%Medicare 3%Other / private 12%

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $770K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$306per resident / day
operating cost
$9,293per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$305per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395986. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next