Julia Ribaudo Extended Care Center
1404 Golf Park Drive, Lake Ariel, PA 18436 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 119 certified beds · (570) 698-5647 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 27.2% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.1% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 20.7% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.0% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.0% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.8% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.0% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.3% | 17.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.3% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 58.8% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.1% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.6% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.14 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.29 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 101 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.5%CMS range 36.2–54.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.3%CMS range 9.2–17.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 86.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.2–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.73 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 87.5 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary food storage, dishwashing, and ice machine sanitation practices in the food and nutrition services department. These failures had the potential to contaminate food and ice served to residents and increased the risk of foodborne illness.Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that encounters food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). During the initial tour of the food and nutrition services department on June 14, 2026, at 9:15 AM, in the presence of Employee 3, Cook/Dietary Aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility infection control records, clinical records, facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement and maintain an antibiotic stewardship program and conduct and document antibiotic stewardship monitoring for eight of 8 months reviewed (November 2025 through June 2026) and failed to follow its antibiotic stewardship process for 1 of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 97).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, last updated June 5, 2026, revealed the program focuses on improving antimicrobial use by avoiding inappropriate or unnecessary antimicrobials. The policy stated antimicrobial use would be reviewed through monitoring and tracking of antimicrobial prescribing, use, and resistance to promote optimal antimicrobial use within the facility. The policy required the use of an antimicrobial tracking form or system to track and trend infections by site and organism. The policy also required monthly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment was in safe operating condition in the facility's food and nutrition area. Findings include: A review of a policy for Freezers and Refrigerators, lase reviewed June 5, 2026, revealed the facility will ensure safe refrigerator and freezer maintenance and sanitation. The food and nutrition services director will inspect refrigerators and freezers monthly for gasket, fan condition, the presence of rust, excess condensation and any other damage or maintenance issues. Necessary repairs will be initiated immediately. A tour of the facility's main kitchen area on June 14, 2026, at approximately 9:30 AM revealed the walk in freezer with a large ice buildup on the ceiling, double exhaust fans, walls and floor. The pipe located under the exhaust fans (to remove the condensation/water from inside the unit to the outside of the building was missing, leaving an exposed hole in the freezer to the outside of the building. The freezer was located on an outside wall of the kitchen. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for residents on five of 5 resident units. (Units A,B,C,D and E )Findings include: An environmental tour conducted on June 14, 2026, at 9:30 AM revealed that the floor on all resident hallways (A,B,C,D and E) had a thick, yellow sticky substance around the perimeter to include in front of resident rooms and ancillary rooms. The high back upholstered chairs in the A,B activity/dining room had food and dried liquid stains on them. The floor was dirty with dirt and liquid stains. The floor under the ice machine had a black sticky substance on it as well as a large amount of dirt, paper and dried liquid stains. The C/D activity/dining room floor was dirty with dried food debris, dirt and dried liquid stains. The floor behind the ice machine was dirty with paper and plastic debris, dried liquid stains and visible dirt. The high back upholstered chairs had food and dried liquid stains on them. There was a large, uncovered bin with bagged dirty linen as well…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to maintain accurate records of controlled substances and ensure accountability for controlled drug administration for one resident (Resident 35), and failed to notify the physician when a prescribed medication could not be administered as ordered for one resident (Resident 98) out of 20 residents reviewed.Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Routine Reconciliation of Controlled Substances, last reviewed by the facility on June 5, 2026, revealed that the facility will maintain separate controlled substance records for all Schedule II medications and other medications with a potential for abuse or diversion through the use of a Controlled Substance Declining Inventory Record. The policy further revealed that incoming nurses (the nurses beginning a shift and accepting responsibility for resident care and medication accountability) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-16 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of scheduled facility mealtimes, facility policy, resident interviews, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently offer nourishing evening snacks when the scheduled time between dinner and breakfast exceeded 14 hours for residents residing on four nursing units. This deficient practice affected six of six residents who participated in a resident council interview (Residents 48, 95, 39, 33, 75, and 69).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Meal Times and Frequency Policy, last reviewed by the facility on June 5, 2026, revealed it is the facility policy that there will be no more than 14 hours between a substantial evening meal (dinner) and breakfast the following day; except when a nourishing snack is served at bedtime, up to 16 hours may elapse between a substantial evening meal (dinner) and breakfast the following day if a resident group agrees to this meal span. A review of the facility's scheduled meal service times revealed that the time between dinner and breakfast exceeded 14 hours on all nursing units…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, medication administration records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to document the use of non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of an as needed psychotropic medication and failed to obtain and document a clinical rationale to support continuation of the psychotropic medication beyond the federally permitted 14-day period for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 98).Findings include: Federal requirements for the use of psychotropic medications expect that psychotropic medications are used only when necessary to treat a specific, documented condition. A PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication order is limited to 14 days unless the prescribing practitioner documents the clinical rationale for extending the order and specifies the duration of the extension. Non-pharmacological interventions are approaches that do not involve medications, such as reassurance, redirection, environmental modifications,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to ensure licensed nurses administered medications in accordance with physician-ordered parameters for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 38).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications last reviewed on June 5, 2026, revealed that medications are administered as prescribed in a safe, timely manner. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, and information is verified prior to administering medication including vital signs (measurements of basic body functions such as blood pressure, pulse, temperature, and breathing), are verified prior to administering medications when specific parameters are ordered. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include hypotension (low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 84). Findings Include: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident 84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left dominant side. Hemiplegia is paralysis of one side of the body. Hemiparesis is weakness on one side of the body. A cerebral infarction is a stroke caused by an interruption of blood flow to an area of the brain. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated March 28, 2026, revealed that Resident 84 was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 7 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered in accordance with physician orders for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 98).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, last reviewed by the facility on June 5, 2026, revealed it is the facility's policy to administer oxygen by the route and at the rate ordered by the provider. Clinical record review revealed Resident 98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included asthma (a chronic condition in which the airways become inflamed and narrowed, making breathing difficult) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a progressive lung disease that limits airflow and makes breathing difficult). A review of Resident 98's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated April 20,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, laboratory reports, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medication by administering an antibiotic without documented clinical evidence supporting an active infection for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 97).Findings Include:A review of Resident 97's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included epilepsy (a chronic neurological disorder characterized by recurring seizures) and parkinsonism (a group of neurological disorders that cause movement problems such as tremors, stiffness, and slowed movement). A review of the facility policy titled Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Policy, last reviewed by the facility on June 6, 2026, revealed antibiotics should be prescribed only when clinical evidence supports the presence of an active infection. The policy further revealed appropriate indications for antibiotic use include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to adhere to acceptable storage and labeling practices for multi-dose medications for two of two medication carts observed (A Hall and B Hall medication carts).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals last reviewed by the facility [DATE], indicated that multi-use medication vials or bottles that have been opened or accessed (e.g. seal broken) are to be labeled with the date they were opened to ensure proper tracking for expiration purposes. An observation of the medication cart located on A hall unit on [DATE], at 8:56 AM, in the presence of Employee 2 RN (Registered Nurse) of the medication stored in the medication cart, revealed one (1) multi-dose insulin pen of Insulin glargine (a long acting insulin medication used to lower blood sugar) and one (1) multi-dose pen of Insulin Aspart (a fast short acting insulin medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, staff interviews, clinical record review, and direct observation, it was determined the facility failed to establish, maintain, and implement an effective infection prevention and control program to prevent the spread of infections regarding animal visitation and indwelling urinary catheter maintenance for 2 of 6 sampled residents. (Residents 1 and 2). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control Policies and Practices, last reviewed February 12, 2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility to maintain an organized, effective facility-wide program designed to systematically prevent, identify, control and reduce the risk of acquiring and transmitting infections among employees, volunteers, visitors and contract healthcare workers. The policy indicated that employees support resident safety by adhering to all policies and procedures related to infection prevention. A review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, resident council meeting minutes, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide an environment that promotes each resident's quality of life by ensuring residents' personal space was free from intrusions by other residents (Residents 16 and 19), including experiences reported by two residents out of the 25 residents sampled (Residents 3 and 29) and experiences reported by six out of the eight residents during a resident group interview (Residents 26, 28, 32, 49, 69, and 90). Findings include:A review of resident council meeting minutes dated May 27, 2025, revealed residents in attendance had concerns regarding one resident wandering into resident rooms. A review of the meeting minutes failed to determine if this concern was resolved. A review of resident council meeting minutes dated June 26, 2025, revealed residents in attendance had concerns regarding wandering residents. The minutes indicated the concerns for wandering residents were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident council meeting minutes, resident and staff interviews, and observations it was determined the facility failed to maintain an adequate supply of clean linens to meet the needs of residents for 2 of 4 resident care units observed (E Hallway and A Hallway). Finding include: Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated July 29, 2025, revealed residents expressed concerns regarding the availability of linens. The minutes further documented that the Nursing Home Administrator identified nurse aides were discarding washcloths, and the Administrator noted that a lot of linen had been ordered for staff to utilize while providing care to residents. Observations conducted on August 12, 2025, at approximately 11:00 AM in the E Hallway revealed one washcloth available for resident care. Additional observation of the A Hallway at approximately 11:15 AM on the same day revealed a linen cart containing only three bath towels and three washcloths available for resident care. Observations conducted on August 13, 2025, at 8:15 AM in the E Hallway revealed no washcloths and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of scheduled facility mealtimes, select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide snacks as desired by residents, including experiences reported by four out of eight residents during a group interview (Residents 28, 32, 69, and 90). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Meal Times and Frequency Policy, last reviewed by the facility on February 1, 2025, revealed that it is the facility policy that there will be no more than 14 hours between a substantial evening meal (dinner) and breakfast the following day; except when a nourishing snack is served at bedtime, up to 16 hours may elapse between a substantial evening meal (dinner) and breakfast the following day if a resident group agrees to this meal span. A review of the facility's scheduled mealtimes revealed that the time between dinner and breakfast the next day exceeds 14 hours. Specifically, residents residing in the North Nursing Unit Area 1 are scheduled to receive dinner at 4:40 PM and receive breakfast at 7:10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, a review of facility-provided documents, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program on two of two nursing units (South Nursing B Hall and North Nursing D Hall) and in the North Nursing Resident Dining/Lounge area. In addition, two residents out of twenty-five sampled (Residents 62 and 81) and six residents out of eight during a resident group interview (Residents 26, 28, 32, 49, 69, and 90) reported ongoing problems with small black flies, gnats, or ants in resident rooms and common areas.Findings include: A review of a facility policy entitled Pest Control Policy that was last reviewed on February 1, 2025, indicated routine pest control procedures will be in place to prevent pest infiltration and contracted pest services will document all visits along with actions taken. A review of the facility's current contract with the pest management contractor signed and dated August 12, 2019, revealed year-round protection against pests (except for gnats, outdoor pests and other free flying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that addressed the resident's individualized needs and interventions for safe transfers for one out of 25 residents sampled (Resident 22). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function) and anxiety disorder (a condition in which excessive worry causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other areas of functioning). A physician's order indicated Resident 22 required the assistance of two staff members for transfers using the standing lift (mechanical device used to help a resident who has some weight bearing ability but cannot safely stand or transfer without assistance) initiated on January 14, 2025. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records, documentation provided by the facility, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement adequate safety measures to prevent accidents for two out of 25 residents sampled (Resident 62 and 63). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, last revised June 2024, revealed the interdisciplinary team should assess and determine with respect to each resident whether self-administration of medications is safe and clinically appropriate, based on the resident's functionality and health condition. The policy indicates that if it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and the care plan, the facility should routinely assess the residents cognitive, physical and visual ability to carry out this responsibility, and the resident should have a locked medication storage compartment in their room so that another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered and maintained in accordance with physician orders and facility policy, including requirements for equipment labeling, dating, and routine maintenance, in a manner that minimized the risk for infection for two residents out of twenty-five sampled (Residents 3 and 62). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration Policy, last reviewed by the facility on February 1, 2025, revealed it is the facility's policy that licensed clinicians with demonstrated competence will administer oxygen by way of the specified route as ordered by a provider. The policy indicates changing the humidifier bottle (containers attached to an oxygen concentrator to add moisture to the oxygen being delivered) when empty; length of use is dependent upon the liter flow setting (a measurement describing the amount of oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and select facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to the administration of a narcotic pain medication prescribed on an as needed basis for one resident out of 25 sampled residents (Resident 19). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy entitled Pain Management with a policy review date of February 1, 2025, indicated that non- pharmalogical interventions will be attempted prior to the admission of a PRN (as needed) medication, If the nonpharmacological interventions fail then with corresponding intensity ratings, the resident will be administered the medication ordered for the corresponding pain rating within the PRN order. A clinical record review revealed that Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest that affects…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, facility policies, clinical records, and facility investigative documents, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement a physician's order as written for one of 8 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated the registered nurse is responsible for assessing human responses and plans, implementing nursing care, analyzing/comparing data with the norm in determining care needs, and carrying out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses that included depression and atrial fibrillation (a cardiac arrhythmia characterized by an irregular and often rapid heart rhythm). A physician's order dated October 2, 2024, was noted for Eliquis (blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and review of professional literature, the facility's assessment, facility provided documentation, and review of the medical, psychiatric, and mental health conditions of the resident census, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment, using evidence-based methods, which identified the specific resources necessary to care for its specific resident population. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Memorandum, Revised Guidance for Long-Term Care Facility Assessment Requirements (QSO-24-13-NH) dated June 18, 2024, revealed that the facility assessment must include an evaluation of diseases, conditions, physical or cognitive limitations of the resident population, acuity (the level of severity of residents' illnesses, physical, mental, and cognitive limitations, and conditions) and any other pertinent information about the resident population as a whole that may affect the services the facility must provide. Continued review revealed, The assessment of the resident population…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policy, the facility's infection control log and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain and implement a comprehensive program to monitor and prevent infections in the facility. Findings included: A review of facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy last reviewed by the facility on December 15, 2023, indicated that the facility must maintain an organized, effective facility-wide program designed to systematically prevent, identify, control, and reduce the risk of acquiring and transmitting infections; conduct surveillance of communicable disease and infectious outbreaks; and monitor employee health. A review of the facility's infection control data revealed the facility's infection control program failed to reflect an operational system to monitor and investigate causes of infection and manner of spread. There was no evidence of a system, which enabled the facility to analyze clusters, changes in prevalent organisms, or increases in the rate of infection in a timely manner. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to restore normal bowel function for one out of 21 residents sampled (Resident 75). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Continence Management Program, last reviewed by the facility on December 15, 2023, revealed the facility will ensure a plan designed to manage incontinence is developed according to the resident's needs and capabilities. The policy indicates residents should be considered for a bowel incontinence program for those who require limited to extensive assistance in toilet use or who could benefit from a prompted or scheduled toileting plan. The license nurse will complete a new continence evaluation once they identify a pattern. The licensed nurse will develop a toileting plan, determining the approaches needed to achieve the goals. A clinical record review revealed Resident 75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to maintain records of controlled drugs and ensure accurate drug administration for one out of the 21 residents sampled (Resident 75) and failed to store drugs in a safe manner for one out of the 21 residents sampled (Resident 39). Findings include: A facility policy titled Long Term Care Facility Pharmacy Services and Procedures Manual 5.4 Inventory Control of Controlled Substance, last reviewed by the facility on December 15, 2023, revealed the facility should maintain separate individual controlled substance records on all Schedule II medications and any medication with a potential for abuse or diversion. The policy also indicates the facility should regularly check inventory records to reconcile inventory. The facility should regularly reconcile current inventory to the controlled medication declining inventory record and the resident's medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policies, investigative reports, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that two residents out of 21 sampled (Residents 35 and 64) were free from abuse perpetrated by another resident (Resident 76). Findings include: A facility policy titled Pennsylvania Resident Abuse Section: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, last reviewed by the facility on December 15, 2023, revealed the facility will not tolerate abuse by anyone. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, intimidation, or punishment, resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. The policy indicates that physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, punching, and kicking. Verbal abuse is defined as the use of language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms directed at residents or their families, regardless of the resident's age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Furthermore, the policy states that willful means the individual must have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adaptive dining equipment as required and prescribed for one resident out of 21 sampled (Resident 52). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include early onset Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) diagnosed before the age of 65, protein-calorie malnutrition (a condition caused by not getting enough calories or the right amount of protein and nutrients needed for health), and oropharyngeal dysphagia (swallowing problems occurring in the mouth and/or throat). Review of a Speech Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 52 was not able to self-control the rate and amount of food and liquids presented to him at meals. The resident was provided with a maroon spoon (an adaptive spoon with a narrow, shallow bowl)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident out of five sampled was free of chemical restraints used to most readily control the resident's behavior and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms (Resident B1). Findings include: A review of Resident B1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), unspecified psychosis (is the term for a collection of symptoms that happen when a person has a disconnection from reality and can occur due to different mental and physical conditions), and insomnia. An annual Minimum Data Set assessment (a federally mandated standardized assessment completed periodically to plan resident care) dated May 8, 2024, indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS (brief interview to assess cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-18 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents had access to a telephone that afforded privacy for residents during telephone calls on two out of two resident units. Findings include: Observation of the Countryside nursing station on January 18, 2024, at approximately 10:50 AM revealed no telephones intended for resident use that afforded the residents privacy during telephone calls. Interview with Employee 1 (nurse aide) on January 18, 2024, at approximately 10:52 AM revealed that the residents may use the corded telephone located behind the nursing station. The resident may sit behind the nurses station or staff place the phone on the counter for the resident to reach. Employee 1 confirmed there is no area for the residents to have a private conversation while at the nurses station. Employee 1 explained that the facility previously had cordless phones for the residents use however the phones stopped working and they were never replaced. Observation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely notify the resident's interested representative of a change in condition for one resident out of 12 sampled (Resident A1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident A1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder ( is a mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression or mania), diabetes and anxiety. A review of the resident's recorded monthly weights revealed that on November 7, 2023, the resident's weight was noted as 195 lbs. The resident's next recorded monthly weight was dated December 6, 2023, revealed that the resident's weight decreased to 171 lbs. The resident lost 24 lbs, a significant weight loss of 12% loss of body weight, in one month. A dietary note dated December 6, 2023, indicated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide timely and necessary foot care for one of eight residents sampled (Resident A1). Findings include: Review of Resident A1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include diabetes and deep vein thrombosis (blood clot in a deep vein). Review of clinical records revealed Resident A1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. A review of the hospital podiatry (foot doctor) consultation report dated December 22, 2023, at 12:00 PM, revealed that the reason for the consult was Nails in disarray. The report stated that the Patient has elongated nails with what looks like a traumatic avulsion of the right 4th nail. Elongated nails that appear painful for the patient. Elongated nails x 9 b/l LE (bilateral lower extremities) that are thickened and with subungual debris noted (debris under to toenails). Further review of the resident's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide services necessary to maintain adequate personal hygiene of residents who need assistance with activities of daily living for three out of 8 residents reviewed. (Residents 1, 2 and 3). Findings include: A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on December 1, 2023, with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke). The resident was cognitively intact and admitted for short term therapy services. A review of the resident's clinical record and initial care plan revealed no evidence of the resident's shower or bathing schedule or preferences. A review of the facility's shower schedule binder revealed that Resident 1 was to receive a shower on Wednesdays during the 7 AM. to 3 PM shift and Saturdays on the 3 PM to 11 PM. A review of the resident's bathing record conducted during the survey of December 20, 2023, revealed that Resident 1 was showered only once since her admission to the facility on December 1, 2023. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, resident, family and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that promotes each residents' quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, which negatively impacted the residents' quality of life in the facility as evidenced by three of 8 residents interviewed (Residents 1, 6, and 7). Findings include: A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on December 1, 2023, for short term rehab therapy services with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke). The resident was assessed as cognitively intact. During an interview on December 20, 2023, at approximately 12:30 PM, Resident 1 and her husband stated that she has waited from 30 minutes up to an hour for staff to respond to her call bell and provide assistance when requested. Resident 1 stated that these long waits for staff to respond to her requests for assistance have occurred multiple times since her admission to the facility at the beginning of the month. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from potential accident hazards and obstacles to safe mobility assistance devices. Findings include: According to §483.90(i)(3) Facilities must equip corridors with firmly secured handrails on each side of the corridor (Secured handrails means handrails that are firmly affixed to the wall). An observation of the E hallway on December 20, 2023 at 10 A.M. and again at 1 P.M. revealed 3 rollator walkers, 5 wheelchairs, a resident room arm chair, a stool and a large linen cart were lined up blocking access to the handrails on the right side of the corridor. These items completely obstructed resident access to the hand railing on the right side of the hallway. Observations at that time revealed multiple residents self-propelling in wheelchairs in the hallway. During an interview December 20, 2023 at 1:30 P.M. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the handrails on the right side of hallway were obstructed and that residents did not have unimpeded access to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the consistent implementation of infection control practices designed to prevent the spread of scabies. Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Scabies Management Policy last reviewed on September 7, 2023, indicated it is the policy of the facility to treat residents infected with and sensitized to scabies and to prevent the spread of scabies to other residents and staff. Scabies is spread by skin to skin contact with the infected area or through contact of bedding, clothing, privacy curtains and some furniture. The diagnosis may be established by recovering the mite from its burrow and identifying it microscopically. Failure to identify scrapings as positive does not exclude the diagnosis. It is difficult to obtain a positive scraping because only one or two mites can cause multiple lesions. Often diagnosis is made from signs and symptoms and treatment followed without scrapings. Affected residents should remain on contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-10-11 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and facility-initiated transfer notices and a staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide written notices of facility-initiated hospital transfers of residents, with the reasons for the move in writing, to one out of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 53). Findings include: Regulatory requirements indicate that before a facility transfers or discharges a resident, the facility must notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 53 required to be transferred to the hospital on August 5, 2024, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the facility provided Immediate Discharge/Transfer Notice revealed the resident required an immediate transfer/discharge to an acute care facility on August 5, 2024, because the resident's urgent medical needs cannot be met in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-20 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to correctly post nurse staffing information. Findings include: According to §483.35(g)(2) Posting requirements. (i) The facility must post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift. Observation upon entrance to the facility's nursing units on December 20, 2023 at 9 AM revealed that the posted nursing time was dated December 20, 2023, and was completed for a 24 hour time frame to include day shift and the projected staffing for the evening shift and night shifts. During an interview December 20, 2023 at approximately 1 P.M., the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the posted nursing time was posted for the entire 24 hour period and not posted at the beginning of each shift of nursing duty. 28 Pa. Code: 211.12 (c) Nursing Services
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-27 for 56 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHG AVIV LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2016 |
| VOLPE, BENJAMIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2019 |
| WEISBERG, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2019 |
| NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2019 |
| SHG MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2019 |
| DRAKE, DEBORAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/24/2021 |
| SAKALAS, LORI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/06/2024 |
| CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2011 |
| HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/19/2019 |
| RKL LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/26/2023 |
| SABER GOVERNANCE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2019 |
| SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2011 |
| SHG BOA LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/17/2025 |
| SHG MT, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/17/2025 |
| HOPKINS, JAMIE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/25/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $983K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395493. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.