Suburban Woods Health & Reha

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 96 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 111.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were afforded privacy related to the use of a telephone and medical assessment for two of 23 residents. (Resident R8 and Resident 82) Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Resident's Rights and Facility Responsibilities Policy. last revised 09/30/2020 revealed, It is facility's policy to comply with all resident's rights, and to communicate these rights to residents and their designated representatives in a language that they can understand. Review of Resident R82's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated March 4, 2026, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 which indicated that the resident cognition was severely impaired. On March 16, 2026, at 10:45 a.m., an observation was made of Resident R82 sitting in the dining room with approximately 15 residents, two staff members, and two otolaryngology consulting staff present, who were providing Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) evaluations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, review of clinical records, and facility documentation and policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an investigation related to a resident's fall was complete and thoroughly investigated to rule out neglect for one 24 resident records reviewed (Resident R6). Findings include: Review of the facility's Fall Prevention and Management policy updated in February 2025, stated, Falls will be reviewed such review should include results of the new fall risk assessment, discussion with resident and/or any witnessing partied as to potential causal factors, review of the environment where the fall occurred and discussion as to any new interventions which may help to prevent further falls. Resident R6's clinical records revealed the resident was alert and oriented, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with chronic compression fracture (small breaks in your spine) recently hospitalized for weakness. The resident was care planned for incontinent of bowel and bladder needing one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of clinical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of five percent or greater for two of three residents observed during medication administration (R13, R124).Findings include: On March 17, 2026, at 9:51 a.m., observed that Employee E5, a Licensed Nurse, administered the medicine, Aspirin Tablet Chewable 81 milligrams (MG), to Resident R13. Review of physician order dated May 15, 2026, for R13, revealed an order to administer Aspirin Tablet Delayed Release 81 MG, by mouth one time a day. This represents administration of the incorrect medication formulation. March 17, 2026, at 9:53 a.m., review of Physician order revealed that R13 was signed onto hospice services with a hospice service provider, with a diagnosis of End Stage PVD ( PVD stands for Peripheral Vascular Disease; End-stage Peripheral Vascular Disease is the most severe form of PVD, where blood flow to the limbs is critically reduced, causing pain at rest, non-healing wounds, or tissue damage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0777 — isolated
  Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and review of resident records, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly notify physician of a change in residents' condition when radiology report confirmed positive for fracture for one of 23 records reviewed (Resident R6). Findings include: Resident R6's clinical records revealed the resident was alert and oriented, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with chronic compression fracture (small breaks in your spine) and recently hospitalized for weakness. The resident was care planned for incontinent of bowel and bladder needing one person to assist with toileting and a fall risk, that included, keeping the resident's bed in the lowest position and using proper footwear for safety. Review of Resident R6's nursing notes indicated the resident had an unwitnessed fall and was found lying on the floor in the resident's room on December 20, 2025 at 8:00 a.m. An order was received from on-call doctor to obtain an x-ray of 2 views of the resident's right Femur. (thigh bone) Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medication administration times were following according to physician order for three of three residents reviewed. (Resident R1, Resident R2, Resident R3)Findings include: Review of an undated facility policy, Administration of Medication, under section 6.1 Medication Administration Times, revealed Facility should commence medication administration within sixty (60) minutes before the designated times of administration and should be completed no later than sixty (60) minutes after designated times of administration. Further review revealed Facility should administer medications ordered before meals approximately thirty (30) minutes before mealtimes and should administer medications ordered to be given after meals no later than thirty (30) minutes after a meal has ended. Review of facility meal delivery schedule revealed the following times for all nursing units, Breakfast delivery between 07:35a.m. - 8:25a.m.; Lunch delivery between…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, interviews with residents and staff and reviews of the job descriptions, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the safety of one of two resident reviewed after the resident was returned to the facility from a contracted transportation company, who transported the resident to a medical appointment. (Resident R1) Findings include:Observation of Resident R1 at 10:45 a.m., on December 3, 2025, revealed that this resident was only able to have vision from the left eye. Interview with Resident R1 at the time of the observation revealed that he was having problems with vision in the left eye. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a physician's assessment dated [DATE], that indicated Resident R1 had a history of right eye exenteration for melanoma. Continued review of the physician's report revealed that Resident R1 had been recommended prescription eyeglasses and at this time was diagnosed with a cataract of the left eye. Review of Resident R1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: A tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on March 31, 2025, at 9:15 a.m. with Employee E5, Food Service Director (FSD), revealed the following concerns: Observation in the receiving dock revealed a lot of trash scattered around the loading dock next to the dumpster including empty milk carton, plastic juice cups and paper. Observation in the dry storage area revealed a buildup of dust, dirt and black substance on the floor under she shelves next to the aluminum freezer walls. Observation in the walk-in freezer revealed that the floor was dirty and had debris on the floor under the shelves. Observation in the walk-in cooler revealed that the floor was dark and dirty with [NAME] stains on the floor under the shelves. Observation of the wall in the dish room area…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interviews with residents and staff, review of clinical records, facility documentation and policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect for one of 21 resident records reviewed (Resident R94). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation revised July 2024, states, The facility will not tolerate abuse, neglect, mistreatment, of residents. The same policy states that Mental abuse includes humiliation, punishment and deprivation. Review of Resident R94's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of bipolar disorder (moods of extreme highs and of extreme lows), depression, muscle weakness and scoliosis (unnatural curvature of the spine). Review of Resident R94's nursing note dated March 20, 2025, stated, Resident reported to staff that she had put her call light on and requested to go to the bathroom, she stated that staff informed her she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for one of two residents reviewed for wandering/elopement (Resident R308). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Elopement/Unauthorized Absence dated August 2, 2024, revealed the facility will identify residents with potential and/or actual risk factors for elopement and protect the resident through development and implementation of safety interventions. In the event of a resident elopement the facility will implement its policies and procedures promptly to locate the resident in a timely manner. Review of Resident R308's Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated August 8, 2024, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and had diagnoses of dementia (decline in cognitive function that interferes with daily life) and altered mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0840 — isolated
  Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure timely provision of professional services furnished by outside providers, for one of 21 resident records reviewed (Resident R93). Findings include Review of Resident R93's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Huntington's disease (a rare, inherited neurological disorder that causes nerve cells in the brain to break down, leading to progressive physical and mental decline). Review of nursing note dated January 8, 2025, indicated the resident refused to go to an outside appointment with the hospital related to the diagnosis of Huntington disease. Continue review of the same note stated, Appointment attempted to be rescheduled, message left to contact facility to schedule a new appointment date and time. Further review of Resident R93's clinical record revealed no documented evidence that the facility ensure that the appointment was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA