East End Health & Rehab Center
745 North Highland Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206 · For profit - Corporation · 144 certified beds · (412) 362-6622 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.5% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.2% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.1% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.8% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.2% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.1% | 25.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.4% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 58.1% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.8% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.6% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 93 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.2%CMS range 40.2–57.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.2%CMS range 6.0–12.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 4.0–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.80 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 103.6 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.91 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the dish room and kitchen which created the potential for cross contamination in the designated main kitchen. Findings include: During an observation of the main designated kitchen on 9/08/25, at 9:30 a.m. the following was observed: -Dish room walls, brown debris, paint peeling-Ice machine, brown debris During an interview on at om 9/8/25 at 10:30 a.m. Dietary Manager Employee E7 couldn't provide proof of documentation when the ice machine was last serviced. During an interview on 9/8/25 at 10:45 a.m., Dietary Manager Employee E7 confirmed that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions which created the potential for food borne illness. 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(1) Management.28 Pa. Code: 211.6(c) Dietary services.28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's infection control policies and procedures and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for eleven of eleven months (September 2024 thru August 2025).Findings include: Review of facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship Program last reviewed 4/1/25, indicated the Antibiotic Stewardship will focus on improving antibiotic/antimicrobial use by avoiding unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotics. The antimicrobial stewardship process will be overseen and managed by the Infection Preventionist who works collaboratively with the medical director, pharmacist, nursing and administrative leadership. Review of the facility's Infection Control surveillance for September 2024, thru August 2025, failed to include documentation to indicate that antibiotic monitoring was completed. During an interview completed on 9/9/25, at 2:00 p.m. Infection Preventionist Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E5 confirmed that antibiotic monitoring of infections was not completed for eleven of twelve months…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-12 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) was overseen by an individual who adequately assesses, develops, implements, monitors, manages and has appropriate knowledge, skills and time to perform the IPCP for eleven of twelve months.Findings included: Review of the facility policy Infection Prevention and Control Program last reviewed 4/1/25, indicated to maintain an organized, effective facility-wide program designed to systematically prevent, identify, control and reduce the risk of acquiring and transmitting infections among employees, volunteers, visitors, and contracted healthcare workers; to conduct surveillance of communicable disease and infectious outbreaks; and to monitor employee health.The infection preventionist responsibilities for infection control include but not limited to: Conducts surveillance of staff and residents for the facility-associated infections and/or communicable disease. Provide education, based on surveillance findings, outbreak…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine the ability to self-administer medications for four of eight residents (Residents R25, R81, R88 and R104). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Self-Administration of Medication last reviewed 4/1/25, indicated the facility, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care team, should access and determine whether self-administration of medications is safe and clinically appropriate. The facility should ensure that orders for self-administration list the specific medication(s) the resident may self-administer. If a resident self-administers their medication the facility should routinely assess the residents cognitive, physical, and visual ability. Review of the facility policy General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration last reviewed 4/1/25, indicated during medication administration facility staff observe the resident's consumption of the medication(s). Review of the facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy and staff and interviews it was determined the facility failed to make certain consistent dialysis communication was maintained for two of two residents (Residents R14 and R81), and failed to ensure resident's receiving dialysis received care and treatment as ordered and ensured fluid restrictions were maintained for one of two residents (Resident R81) Findings include: Review of facility Fluid Balance Policy dated 4/1/25, indicated the facility will track intake and/or output with a provider order. The amount of fluid allowed in a 24-hour period will be specified in the provider order. The Nursing and Nutrition Services Team will work together to distribute the restricted fluid amount daily. An allocation for each department will be developed for each level of limitation and will be included in the order. Review of the facility policy Hemodialysis Care Policy last reviewed 4/1/25, indicated licensed staff with demonstrated competence will care for residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, resident clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident's had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement (a binding agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not. The decision is final, can be enforced by a court, and can only be appealed on very narrow grounds) for two of three residents (Resident R82, CR315).Findings include:Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions:13-15: cognitively intact8-12: moderately impaired0-7: severe impairment Review of the admission record indicated Resident R82 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement COVID monitoring, isolation, tracking, and testing in accordance with state and federal guidance for one of two residents (Resident R31), failed to prevent cross contamination during a dressing change for one of three residents (Resident R86), and failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were implemented for one of three residents (Resident R131). The facility failed to implement an infection control program that included a system of surveillance to identify possible communicable diseases or infections for eleven of twelve months (September 2024, thru August 2025).Findings include: Review of the facility Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) Policy last reviewed 4/1/25, revealed enhanced barrier precautions are intended to prevent transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) via contaminate hands and clothing of healthcare workers to high risk residents during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records, an observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one of six residents (Resident R19).Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R19's MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of depression, macular degeneration (an eye disease that affects central vision. This means that people with macular degeneration can't see things directly in front of them.), and muscle wasting. Section B100. Vision was entered as 0, which indicated Resident R19 ability to see in adequate light (with glasses or other visual appliances) was adequate (sees fine detail, such as regular print in newspapers/books.) During an interview on 9/8/25, at 9:58 a.m. Resident R19 stated he was visually impaired and cannot see much. During an observation on 9/9/25, at 12:12 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, staff and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for one out of three residents (Resident R131).Findings include: Review of the facility's Interim/Baseline Care Planning Policy last reviewed 4/1/25, revealed the facility will develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission. The baseline care plan will include the minimum healthcare information necessary to care for a resident. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R131 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of left femur fracture, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and flaccid neuropathic bladder (a condition that disrupts normal bladder function due to nerve damage. This can lead to problems with bladder control, resulting in either an overactive bladder or difficulty emptying the bladder). Review of Resident R131's progress note dated 9/5/25, revealed on 9/4/25, Resident R131 was admitted to the facility with a new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, staff, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for one out of two residents (Resident R19).Findings include: Review of the facility Morning Care/AM Care policy last reviewed 4/1/25, revealed morning care will be offered each day to promote resident comfort, cleanliness, grooming, and general well-being. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of depression, macular degeneration (an eye disease that affects central vision. This means that people with macular degeneration can't see things directly in front of them.), and muscle wasting. Review of Resident R19's MDS dated [DATE], revealed Section GG- Functional Abilities revealed the resident required substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) for toileting hygiene and personal hygiene. The resident requires setup or clean-up assistance with eating.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate treatment and care for a peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC - a thin tube that's inserted through a vein in your arm and passed through to the larger veins near your heart) in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three residents (Resident R84).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Administration of an Intermittent Infusion last reviewed 4/1/25, indicated am intermittent infusion allows the patient to be disconnected from the infusion/administration set between medication doses. Label medication/solution container and administration set with date, time and nurses initials. Review of the facility policy Midline Catheter Dressing Change last reviewed 4/1/25, indicated a sterile dressing change using a transparent dressing is performed upon admission. If transparent dressing is dated, clean, dry and intact the admission dressing change may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store medications and biologicals properly andsecurely in one of five medications carts (fourth floor medication cart) and one of three medication rooms (fourth floor medication room).Findings include: Review of the facility policy General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration last reviewed 4/1/25, indicated facility staff should enter the date opened on the label of medication dates. Review of the facility policy Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals last reviewed 4/1/25, indicated the facility should ensure resident medication rooms are locked and do not contain non medication/biological items. Review of the facility policy Returning Medications to the Pharmacy last reviewed 4/1/25, indicated the facility should return medications with any associated paperwork to pharmacy immediately after such medications have been discontinued. Facility should securely store the medications to be returned to pharmacy until they are picked up by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations, staff, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents food products based on their preferences for one out of four residents (Resident R19).Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of depression, macular degeneration (an eye disease that affects central vision. This means that people with macular degeneration can't see things directly in front of them), and muscle wasting. Review of Resident R19's MDS dated [DATE], revealed the diagnoses were current. During an observation on 9/9/25, at 12:12 p.m. Resident R19 was sitting in front of their lunch tray and stated I don't know what I have, no one had told me. A biscuit was observed on Resident R19's plate. The resident's meal ticked said NO BREAD/NO PASTA. Resident R19 expressed frustration that the facility continuously fails to honor their food preferences of having no bread products.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information on one of two medication carts (3 South medication cart). Findings include: A review of the state operations manual dated 8/8/24, Resident Rights section §483.10(h) Privacy and Confidentiality: The resident has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records. A review of the facility policy General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration dated 4/1/24, indicates observe each resident's privacy and rights in accordance with applicable law (e.g. knocking before entering, pulling the privacy curtains, informing resident what is to occur before administration, blocking unnecessary access to the MAR). During an observation on 10/1/24, at 9:01 a.m. the medication cart outside of resident room [ROOM NUMBER], in the corridor, was left unattended with a resident listing with identifiable and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify physicians of increased and decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels as per physician's order and failed to document appropriate interventions for a resident with hypoglycemia (low blood glucose), for two of four sampled residents (Residents R30 and R63). Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control defines diabetes as: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic (long-lasting) health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy. Most of the food you eat is broken down into sugar (also called glucose) and released into your bloodstream. When your blood sugar goes up, it signals your pancreas to release insulin. Insulin acts like a key to let the blood sugar into your body's cells for use as energy. If you have diabetes, your body either doesn't make enough insulin or can't use the insulin it makes as well as it should. When there isn't enough insulin or cells stop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly assess pressure ulcers and update wound treatments for one of three sampled residents (Residents R30). Findings include: The facility Skin and wound management policy dated 9/19/24, indicated that skin care and pressure injury prevention includes providing routine skin care, conducting a full body assessment upon admission, offload heels for at risk residents, licensed nurse will complete a weekly skin check. Review of Resident R30's admission record indicated he was originally admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R30's MDS assessment (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/20/24, indicated that he had diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (a loss of kidney function resulting in the swelling of feet, fatigue, high blood pressure and changes in urination), diabetes (metabolic disorder impacting organ function related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate and timely podiatry care treatment for one of two residents (Resident R85). Findings include: The facility Admissions agreement: services of other providers policy dated 4/1/24, indicated that the facility will provide basic services. Routine personal hygeine services include nail hygiene services. The resident may receive services from outside providers in the facility, so long as the outside provider is properly licensed and certified under the law. Review of Resident R85's admission record indicated he was originally admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R85's MDS assessment (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/5/24, indicated he had diagnoses that included sarcoidosis (an abnormal collection of cells in the lungs and lymph nodes), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD: a disease characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review facility polices, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that appropriate treatments and services were provided for the use of a urinary catheter as required for one of two residents (Resident R84). Findings include: Review of facility policy Indwelling Urinary Catheter Care Procedure dated 6/1/24, indicated that clinical staff with demonstrated competence may provide urinary catheter care. Such care will help to prevent catheter association urinary infections and prolong the life of the catheter system. Ensure drainage bag is covered with a privacy-dignity cover. Review of Resident R84's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R84's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 9/25/24, indicated diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), heart failure (a progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for two of four residents (Resident R16 and R46). Findings include: Review of facility policy Oxygen Administration dated 4/1/24, indicated licensed clinicians with demonstrated competence will administer oxygen via the specified route as ordered by the provider. Verify provider order. Cleaning: Change oxygen tubing weekly and document accordingly to facility policy. Review of facility policy Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Policy dated 4/1/24, indicated the facility will provide the machines. A licensed clinician trained in the proper setup procedure will make noninvasive positive pressure ventilation setting adjustments and provide ongoing assessment and documentation of the patient ' s condition. Cleaning: Cleanse hose weekly with soap and tap water-air dry. Wash mask with soap and water after each use, let air dry. Once dry store…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to label/date opened medications on one of two medication carts (3 South medication cart) and failed to properly store medical supplies and biologicals in one of two medication carts (3 South medication cart) and failed to secure treatment medications and supplies in one of two treatment carts. (3rd floor treatment cart). Findings include: A review of the facility policy General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration dated 4/1/24, indicates facility staff should enter the date opened on the label of medications with shortened expiration dates (e.g., insulins, irrigation solutions, etc.). A review of the facility policy Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications dated 4/1/24, indicated facility should ensure that food is not to be stored in the refrigerator, freezer, or general storage areas where medications and biologicals are stored. Facility should ensure that medications and biologicals have an expired date on the label. Once any medication or biological…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the potential for cross contamination for two of two laundry room observations, failed to provide PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) signage which created the potential for cross-contamination and the spread of diseases and infections for one of two residents (Resident R51), failed to prevent cross contamination during a dressing change for one of three residents (Resident R16) and failed to prevent cross contamination during a medication pass for one of two residents (Residents R52). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Linen Management Policy dated 4/1/24, indicated linen will be handled, transported, and processed in a manner which reduces risk of contamination or cross contamination. The facility will handle all used linen as potentially contaminated and use stand precautions when handling, sorting, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label food products in the dry storage area and maintain sanitary conditions in the dish room and kitchen which created the potential for cross contamination in the designated main kitchen (Main kitchen). Findings include: A review of the facility Kitchen Sanitation policy dated 7/1/23 , indicated food and nutriton staff will maintain the sanitation of the kitchen. During an observation of the main designated kitchen on 10/30/23, at 8:50 a.m. the following was observed: - 3 bags of cheerios- no label - 2 bags of raisin bran cereal-no label - 1 bag of rice krispies- no label - 1 bag of corn flakes-no label During an observation of the main designated kitchen on 10/30/23, at 9:15 a.m. the following was observed: -Wall fan above clean side of dishwasher, brown debris -Ice machine in the main kitchen and in the dish room contained a brown substances inside the machine During an interview on 10/31/23 at 1:03 p.m. Maintenance Director Employee E5 confirmed the ice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Legionella assessment and plan, implement infection control practices to prevent cross contamination during a dressing change for one of three residents (Resident R279) and the facility failed to maintain a clean dryer filter to ensure linens and laundry are processed in accordance with accepted national standards for one of two dryers (Laundry room). Findings include: Review of the facility Legionella Assessment and Prevention Program policy dated 5/4/22, last reviewed 7/1/23, indicated the facility will ensure a Legionella assessment is conducted in accordance wit state and federal requirements for large, complex water systems. It was indicated the Adminstrator will assign a person responsible to complete the required Legionella assessment. Once the assessment is completed, a plan must be developed for areas identified that require a plan. It was also indicated that the facility will conduct annual testing must be performed annually at four water sources…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy, documents and observations and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program related to fruit flies in the kitchen (Main Kitchen). Findings include: Review of the Pest Control Policy dated 7/1/23, indicated routine pest control procedures will be in place to prevent pest infiltration. Fly strips are prohibited in the kitchen areas. Appropriate action will be taken to eliminate any reported pest situation in the department. During an observation on 10/30/23 at approximately 8:50 a.m. in the dishroom of the Main Kitchen there were three gold fly stick traps full of fruit flies, as staff were doing dishes several fruit flies were observed in the area. Review of provided documentation included pest-control logs dated from 7/20/23-10/6/23. Treatments to the dishwash area were provided on the following dates: 7/20/23 Spot treatment for fruit flies in dishwasher area. Floor drain in front of garbage disposal needs cleaned daily and fans left on to circulate air and dry up excess water. 8/3/23 Gold Stick fly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual (RAI), clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner for one of six residents (Residents R71). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated [DATE], indicated In accordance with the requirements at 42 CFR §483.20(f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(3), long-term care facilities participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs must complete MDS assessments in a timely manner. For a death in facility tracking records, the MDS completion date must be no later than seven days from the event date. Review of Resident R71's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R71's MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, record review, and state scope of practice, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for to one of six residents reviewed (Resident R57). Findings include: Review of the facility's Registered Nurse Job Description, last reviewed 7/1/23, indicated the purpose of this position is to provide care to the residents to ensure that the highest quality of care is maintained at all times. Review of Resident R57's clinical record indicated an admission of 11/30/21, with diagnoses that included depression, muscle weakness, and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one entire side of the body) following cerebral infarction (occurs when poor blood flow to the brain causes cell death) affecting right dominant side. Resident R57's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated 8/22/23, indicated the diagnoses were current. Review of Resident R57's physician order dated 10/2/23, indicated to administer one tablet of 60 milligrams of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, personnel files and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual nurse aid employee evaluations for one of four sampled records (Nurse aide (NA) Employee E8). Findings include: The facility assessment dated 10/3/23, indicated that required in-service training for nurse aides must be sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides, but must be no less than 12 hours per year, and address areas of weakness as determined in nurse aide's performance review. Review of NA Employee E8 personnel record indicated she was hired on 8/17/16. Review of NA Employee E8 personnel record did not include an annual performance evaluation for 2023. During an interview on 11/01/23, at 12:59 p.m. the Director of Human Resources/ Accounts Payable Employee E1 confirmed that the facility failed to complete annual nurse aid employee evaluations as required. 28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(b)(c)(d) Staff development.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that any irregularities submitted in the medication regiment reviews (MRR) by pharmacy were acted upon for one out of two residents (Resident R10). Findings include: Review of Residents R10's admission record indicated he was originally admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included high blood pressure, heart failure(a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), and coronary artery disease (a common term for the buildup of plaque in the heart ' s arteries that could lead to heart attack.) Review of Residents R10's MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the diagnoses were current upon review. Review of Residents R10's care plans dated 9/17/23, indicated that Resident R10 had an alteration in his cardiovascular status due to tachycardia (heart rhythm disorder with heartbeats faster than usual, greater than 100 beats per minute), history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy, resident clinical record review, medication review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to label open medications with a date on one of three medication carts (Third floor Medication B-Cart). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals last reviewed on 8/7/23, indicated that the facility staff should record the date opened on the primary medication container. During an observation on 10/30/23, at 11:38 a.m., of the Third floor Medication B-cart, the following medications were opened and undated. -B-12 1000mcg -Acetaminophen 500mg -Geri-Kot 8.6 mg -Vitamin D3 125mcg -Fish Oil Soft Gel 1000mg During an interview on 10/30/23, at 11:42 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E2 confirmed the facility failed to make certain over the counter medications were dated once opened. During an interview on 10/30/23, at 2:20 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the facility failed to ensure all medications were stored and labeled properly in one of three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff inteviews, it was determined that the facility failed to employ staff with the required skills and competencies to carry out the daily functions of the Dietary Department for three out of 12 months (August, September and October 2023). Findings include: A review of facility document Director of Dining Services Job Description indicated that a qualified candidate must have a B.S. degree in Dietetics or Foods and Nutrition, or certification as a Dietetic Technician. If a Dietetic Technician, must work under the direction of a Registered Dietitian per State requirement. During an interview on 10/31/23 at 10:56 a.m. Regional Registered Dietitian(RD) Employee E11 confirmed the Dietary Director started August 2023, he has experience in kitchen but not in nursing facilities and did not possess a Certified Dietary Manager certificate. A review of the Director of Dietary Services Employee E12 Personnel File revealed that Director of Dining Employee E12 did not possess a Certified Dietary Manager from the certifying board for dietary managers.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, resident clinical record and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a representative signed a binding arbitration agreement on the behalf of residents lacking capacity to understand the agreement terms for two out of four sampled resident records (Resident R38 and Resident R60). Finding include: The facility Resident rights and facility responsibilities policy dated 7/1/23, indicated the facility policy is to comply with all resident rights. The facility Admissions agreement document dated 7/1/23, indicated that the resident representative to sign any and all documents that are a part of the admissions process to the facility on the resident's behalf. A review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment). The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to obtain a physician order for hospice services and to ensure the coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the needs of each resident for end of life care for one of four residents (Resident R13). Findings include: Review of the facility's Hospice Care Policy dated 5/24/23, last reviewed 7/1/23, indicated the facility provides hospice services through collaboration with a Medicare certified hospice agency when ordered by the resident's physician. Review of Resident R13's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anorexia (abnormal loss of appetite), dementia ( a decline in cognitive abilities that impacts a person's ability to perform everyday activities), and anxiety. Review of Resident R13's admission order from the resident's hospice provider dated 6/24/21, indicated the resident was admitted to their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| VOLPE, BENJAMIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2023 |
| NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2023 |
| WEISBERG, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| SABER GOVERNANCE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| SHG MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| PISANO, MARIANNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| EAST END RE GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/30/2023 |
| RKL LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| SABER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/05/2025 |
| WESTERN PA MT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/11/2025 |
| WIW DYNASTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| HALL, DAVID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| MEENAN, CODY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395773. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.