Tremont Health & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 159.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on two of three nursing units. (Nursing Units B, C and E )Findings include: Observations on April 7, 2026, from 10:30 a.m. to April 9, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., revealed the following: The privacy curtain in room [ROOM NUMBER] was stained. In rooms 302, 304, 306, and 312 the air conditioning units were dirty and had a thick layer of dust. The linen closet floors were dusty and dirty under the last shelf. On Unit B, two mechanical lifts and one sit to stand lift were observed and had thick hair and debris wrapped around the wheels. On Unit B, a beverage cart had thick hair and debris wrapped around the wheels two days in a row. The beverage carts were brought to the unit with beverages prior to the meal delivery carts and taken back to the kitchen after the meal. In the nourishment room on Unit B, inside the microwave there was a large amount of dried orange liquid staining on the turntable dish with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to one of 35 sampled residents in a manner that maintained each resident's dignity. (Resident 23)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 23 had diagnoses that included bipolar disorder and depression. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired and required assistance with self-care including eating. A review of the care plan identified that the resident was at nutritional risk and required restorative training and skill practice for eating and swallowing. There was an intervention for staff to provide her with assistance during meals. Observation on April 7, 2026, at 12:10 p.m. through 12:45 p.m., revealed that staff had delivered Resident 23's lunch meal to her in the dining room. The resident received puree texture food on a regular plate that was on top of a base. The resident attempted to eat the pureed meal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, it was determined that the facility failed to report an alleged violation of verbal abuse for one of 36 sampled residents. (Resident 140)Findings include:Review of the facility policy entitled, Pennsylvania Resident Abuse, last reviewed March 24, 2026, defined verbal abuse as the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents, regardless of their age or ability to comprehend. Review of the policy further revealed that the Administrator or Abuse Coordinator would notify the applicable local and state authorities of abuse allegations.Clinical record review revealed that Resident 140 had diagnoses that included major depressive disorder and diabetes. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had no cognitive impairment. On March 18, 2026, a nurse noted that Resident 140 notified staff that someone had left mean notes in his room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for three of 35 sampled residents. (Residents 5, 12, 51)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 had diagnoses that included muscle contractures and cerebral infarction (stroke). Review of an occupational therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed Resident 5 was to wear bilateral (both sides) elbow splints. Review of Resident 5's care plan revealed he was on a Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) with an intervention for staff to apply bilateral elbow splints. Review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], did not indicate that Resident 5 was on a RNP for splint assistance. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 12 had diagnoses that included neurogenic bladder. A physician's order dated April 3, 2024, directed staff to care for Resident 12's bladder catheter. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of 35 sampled residents. (Resident 14)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 14 had a diagnosis of depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], identified that the resident had symptoms of depression. According to the Care Area Assessment summary dated January 12, 2026, the facility identified that depression was a problem for the resident and should have been included in the comprehensive care plan. Review of the care plan revealed that the facility did not develop interventions to address the care area of depression. In an interview conducted on April 10, 2026, at 11:25 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no care plan developed with interventions to address Resident 14's depression. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the environment remained free of accident hazards in one of six shower rooms. (B unit women's shower room)Findings include: Observations of B unit Women's Shower room on April 8, 2026, at 12:55 p.m., revealed that the entry door was not locked and was observed to be used as a common bathroom for toileting. The tub was observed to contain two disposable razors, two cans of shaving cream, one bottle of body wash and a spray bottle that was half full of a yellow/orange color liquid. In an interview on April 8, 2026, at 1:42 p.m., the Director of Nursing stated that the spray bottle contained a chemical cleaner and that there were three ambulatory residents that were cognitively impaired who could have accessed the potentially hazardous materials. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy it was determined that the facility failed to store respiratory equipment appropriately for one of three sampled residents who received oxygen therapy. (Resident 12)Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Oxygen Administration, dated March 24, 2026, revealed that oxygen cannulas (a tube with two prongs where each prong is inserted into each nostril of the nose) and masks were to be changed weekly. When oxygen tubing was not in use it was to be kept in a plastic bag. Staff were to place a new bag on the side of the concentrator or portable oxygen tank weekly to hold the tubing. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 12 had diagnoses that included chronic congestive heart failure and dependence on supplemental oxygen. On December 10, 2025, the physician ordered that staff administer oxygen therapy via nasal cannula at a rate of three liters per minute at bedtime. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment for March 17, 2026, revealed that the resident was alert and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure completion of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of three sampled residents who were discharged from the facility. (Resident 109) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 109 passed away in the facility on [DATE]. There was no documented evidence that an MDS assessment was completed to reflect the discharge status when the resident expired in the facility. In an interview on [DATE], at 11:00 a.m., the Administrator confirmed that the MDS had not been completed when the resident was discharged from the facility on [DATE].

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physicians' orders were implemented for four of 36 sampled residents. (Residents 5, 21, 33, and 56) Findings include: Review of the policy entitled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, last reviewed November 26, 2024, revealed that staff were to obtain vital signs if necessary and document physician-indicated medication administration information. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 had diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis) and multiple sclerosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated February 28, 2025, revealed Resident 5 had cognitive impairment, was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, and was dependent on staff for putting on and taking off footwear. Review of Resident 5's care plan revealed he had the potential for skin breakdown with an intervention for staff to apply bilateral pressure relieving boots. On April 4, 2024, the physician ordered for staff to apply bilateral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to enhance each resident's quality of life by offering showers as scheduled to four of six sampled residents. (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease . The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident needed staff assistance for bathing. The resident was to receive a shower twice per week on Monday and Thursday. Review of documentation in the clinical record revealed that the resident only received two showers since admission to the facility on July 4, 2024. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and hypertension. The MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated the resident needed staff assistance for bathing. The resident was to receive a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA