Terrace Health & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 83.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 100.9 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-08-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of the food council minutes, resident group meeting information, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and attractive.Findings include:Review of three months of food council meeting minutes identified residents stating that the food was tasteless. During the resident group meeting on 8/26/25, at 1:48 p.m., the consensus of the resident's indicated: food trays had hair in them at times, and they question if hair nets are used. Kitchen staff is rude when you call them if they answer the phone and the kitchen staff is rude to the floor staff as well when they call. Rarely get the meal order that is on the menu. The paper on your tray is not accurate often. You get cereal and no milk or milk and no cereal. During an observation of tray line service on 8/27/25 from 11:42 a.m., through 12:40 p.m., the following was observed:When pureed foods were plated, they were all placed in a big glob and the zucchini was very thin and all three items mixed together.18 residents did not receive the cherry…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed maintain sanitary conditions to prevent the potential for cross-contamination or foodborne illness in the main kitchen (Main Kitchen).Findings include:During an observation of the kitchen on 8/2725, from 11:22 a.m., through 12:45 p.m., the following was observed:A foam glass with liquid and initials SM was observed on food prep table near cooler, Dietary Aide Employee E7 confirmed it was hers.at 11:37 a.m. Dietary Aide Employees E7 and E8 entered the kitchen with their hair not completely covered with hairnet. Dietary [NAME] Employee E9 was wiping down prep areas took rag with gloves into hall, then returned and donned gloves and began placing bread onto pan, left area to get cheese from refrigerator, opened cheese packed in plastic wrap, removed cheese and began making grilled cheeses sandwiches. No handwashing between tasks. Dietary Manager (DM) Employee E6 picked up scoop he dropped onto floor, took it to sink, returned to tray line placed gloves and began serving meals, no hand washing prior…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, facility records, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain call lights were accessible for six of twelve residents as required (Resident R1, R20, R72, R94, R109, and R502).Based on a review of facility policy, facility records, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain call lights were accessible for six of twelve residents as required (Resident R1, R20, R72, R94, R109, and R502). Findings include: The facility policy Resident Rights dated 3/28/25, indicated Call light or bell access will be within reach of the resident as one method to communicate needs to staff. Review of Resident R1's clinical record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's care plan documented interventions initially dated 5/1/23 and revised on 3/31/25 place call bell within reach, remind resident to call for assistance. Review of the resident's bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0685 — pattern
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview with therapy staff and resident, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined facility failed to ensure that residents received proper treatment and assistive device to maintain hearing abilities for one of three residents (Resident R30).Findings include:According to S483.25(a)(2) - Assistive devices to maintain hearing include, but are not limited to, hearing aids, and amplifiers.The facility's responsibility is to assist residents and their representatives in locating and utilizing any available resources (e.g., Medicare or Medicaid program payment, local health organizations offering items and services which are available free to the community) for the provision of the services the resident needs. This includes making appointments and arranging transportation to obtain needed services.During an interview on 8/27/25, at 9:01 a.m., Resident R30 call light above her door was illuminated and Therapy Employee E4, entered the room and asked Resident R30 what she needed. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain consistent dialysis communication was maintained for two of two residents (Residents R2 and R92).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Hemodialysis Care and Monitoring dated 3/28/25, indicates The care of the resident receiving dialysis services will include ongoing communication, coordination and collaboration between the dialysis center and the facility that may include but is not limited to: Telephonic communication, providing pre and post documentation of resident assessment to evaluate the resident response to dialysis and update care plan in collaboration with dialysis recommendations. Medication administration timing, changes and new orders. The facility will provide a copy of the current MAR and pre-evaluation for dialysis from the electronic medical record to the dialysis center. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R2 was initially admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified Food Service Director to manage the daily operations of the Dietary Department for 11 out of 12 months (October 2024 through August 2025).Findings include: During an interview on 8/26/25, at 9:32 a.m., Corporate Certified Dietary Manager Employee E5 stated that Food Service Director (FSD) Employee E6 is not a Certified Dietary Manager. That the FSD was Serv Safe certified.During an interview on 8/27/25, at 10:25 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator stated that the Registered Dietitian (RD) was not employed full [NAME] she comes in three times a week. During an interview on 8/27/25, at 2:00 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the facility failed to provide documented evidence that FSD Employee E6 met the qualifications for the position of Food Service Director. Pa Code: 201.18(e)(6) Management.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dining experience that promoted resident dignity for 1 of 5 residents (Resident R62). Findings include:A review of the facility Resident Rights policy dated 3/28/25, indicated that the resident has a right to a dignified existence.A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included epilepsy, intellectual disability, diabetes, and need for assist with personal care. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/6/25, indicated Resident R62 has severely impaired cognition and requires supervision and assistance of one person for eating.During meal observations in the main dining room of the second-floor nursing unit on 8/27/25 at 12:00 p.m., it was revealed that five residents were seated at the dining table including Resident R62. Four residents were served meal trays at 12:05 p.m. and were eating.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was implemented related to assisting/cueing a resident for eating for one of five residents (Resident R70). Findings include:Review of facility policy Plan of Care Overview dated 3/28/25, indicated that the facility will provide resident centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical, and emotional needs and concerns of each resident. The plan provides guidance to the facility to support the inclusion of the resident in the plan to enable the resident to live with dignity and supports the resident's goals, choices and preferences related to their daily routines.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R 70's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/8/25, indicated diagnoses of diabetes, bilateral cataracts, lung disease, anxiety, cognitive deficit, and dementia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for one of five residents (Residents R70).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Routine Resident Care, dated 3/28/25, indicated that the facility will promote resident centered care by attending to the total medical, nursing, physical, emotional, mental, social and spiritual needs. During an observation on 8/27/25, at 8:40 a.m., Resident R70 was in her room having difficulty eating. Resident had slip indicating a Kennedy cup (assistive aide drinking cup) which was not identified on her tray, there were no staff assisting the resident and she appeared to be having difficulty getting food into her mouth and food was not cut up for her to have the ability to spoon food. Resident was asked if she was ok, she stated No, then began shaking when attempting to scoop food items. Staff indicated that she feeds herself. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident adaptive eating equipment and utensils for one out of five residents (Resident R70).Findings Include:Review of the facility policy Assistive Eating Devices dated 3/28/25, indicated the facility will provide assistive eating devices to residents with limited arm mobility, grasp. range of motion as recommended by nursing or therapy to promote independence in drinking and eating to their maximum ability. During an observation on 8/27/25, at 8:40 a.m., Resident R70 was in her room having difficulty eating. Resident had slip indicating a Kennedy cup (assistive drinking cup) which was not identified in her tray, there were no staff assisting the resident and she appeared to be having difficulty getting food into her mouth and food was not cut up for her to have easier ability to spoon food. Resident was asked if she was ok, she stated No, then began shaking when attempting to scoop food items. Staff indicated that she feeds herself.Review of Resident R70's plan of care dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA