Twin Pines Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 49.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 106 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 112.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's policy, clinical records, hospital records, and interviews with staff, nurse practitioner, resident, and family, it was determined the facility failed to timely notify and report accurate information of a resident's change in condition to the physician for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure resulted in actual harm of the resident when they were hospitalized , requiring intubation, mechanical ventilation, and ICU (Intensive Care Unit) admission for monitoring. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Change in Condition Policy, last reviewed on June 2, 2025, revealed The licensed nurse will recognize and intervene in the event of a change in resident condition. The Physician/Provider and the family/Responsible Party will be notified as soon as the nurse has identified the change in condition. Review of Resident 1's diagnosis list includes Multiple Sclerosis (condition that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a clinical records review, interview with staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP), it was determined that the facility failed to practice professional standards of nursing by performing a procedure without a physician's order for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings: A review of Resident 1's diagnosis list includes Multiple Sclerosis (a disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves, causing numbness, weakness, trouble walking, vision changes, and other symptoms), Neurogenic bladder (Occurs when nerve damage disrupts the communication between your brain, spinal cord, and bladder muscle), and UTI (Urinary Tract Infection). A review of Resident 1's active care plan revealed Resident had an altered elimination r/t (related to) suprapubic catheter (A flexible tube inserted through the lower abdomen directly into the bladder to drain urine). A review of Resident 1's nursing progress notes dated May 24, 2026, at 10:33 a.m., revealed Resident c/o (complained of) difficulty urinating/pain at Cath (catheter) site, states [resident] has a UTI. Thinks…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical records review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide consistent monitoring of the resident's urine output and perform a procedure with a physician's order for one of the two residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings: A review of Resident 1's diagnosis list includes Multiple Sclerosis (a disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves, causing numbness, weakness, trouble walking, vision changes, and other symptoms), Neurogenic bladder (Occurs when nerve damage disrupts the communication between your brain, spinal cord, and bladder muscle), and UTI (Urinary Tract Infection). A review of Resident 1's active care plan revealed Resident had an altered elimination r/t (related to) suprapubic catheter (A flexible tube inserted through the lower abdomen directly into the bladder to drain urine). The interventions include assessing/recording signs of UTI (pain, burning, blood-tinged urine, cloudiness, change in behavior), Catheter output every shift, recording output amount every shift, and as needed. A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food stored in the walk-in fridge and freezer were properly stored to prevent contamination and ensure safe storage in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Findings include: Observations in the walk-in freezer in the kitchen on April 27, 2026, at 9:30 a.m., in the presence of the Dietary Manager Employee E5 revealed the following: one bag of frozen biscuits inside an open plastic bag placed within an open cardboard box, frozen diced carrots inside an opened plastic bag placed within an open cardboard box. Observations on April 28, 2026, at 1:30 p.m., in the presence of Employee E5 revealed the following: frozen spinach inside an opened plastic bag placed within a cardboard box and frozen hamburger patties inside an opened plastic bag placed within a cardboard box. Interview with Employee E5 on April 30, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., confirmed that the above-mentioned foods observed on April 27, 2026, and April 28, 2026, were not properly stored.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, clinical records review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated for appropriate wheelchair positioning for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 9).Findings revealed:A review of Resident 9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- A standardized assessment tool that measures health status in long-term care residents) dated August 7, 2025, revealed resident had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's' Disease (irreversible, progressive degenerative disease of the brain, resulting in loss of reality contact and functioning ability), Seizure disorders (A chronic neurological condition characterized by recurrent seizures caused by abnormal electrical activity in the brain), and Contracture-knee (A permanent, stiffening of muscles, tendons, ligaments or skin, causing restriction in joint movement). The same MDS revealed that residents' cognition was severely impaired and dependent on all ADL's (activities of daily living).A review of Resident 9's progress notes dated September 17, 2025, at 11:01 a.m., revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physicians were notified and an intervention was put in place for a significant weight loss for two of two residents reviewed (Resident 27 and 83).Findings:Review of Resident 27's diagnosis includes Dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase (Trouble starting a swallow because the mouth and throat muscles aren't working smoothly, making it hard to move food or liquid from the mouth into the throat) and Type 2 Diabetes (DM- failure of the body to effectively use insulin produced in the body, insulin regulates blood sure to pass from blood stream to cells).A review of Resident 27's clinical records weight and vitals revealed, December 5, 2025, Resident 27 weighed 151.9 pounds and on January 1, 2026, the resident weighed 140.9 pounds a 7.2% weight loss in 27 days. There were no documented evidence indicating that the physician was notified of the significant weight loss and that an intervention was put in place after the significant weight loss was identified until March 7, 2026, Boost…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based upon clinical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' physician was notified regarding a resident and failed to ensure residents' physician was notified of a significant weight loss for two of two residents reviewed (Resident 72 and Resident 104). Findings include: Review of Resident 72's clinical progress notes dated July 27, 2024, at approximately 5:45 a.m. revealed Resident 72 suffered a fall out of bed and was found laying on the floor on resident's right side. Further review of Resident 72's clinical progress notes revealed Resident 72 complained of pain upon leg movement. After assessment by facility staff, Resident 72 was returned to bed. Review of clinical documentation failed to reveal evidence that Resident 72''s physician or nurse practitioner were notified of the fall that occurred at 5:45 a.m. Further review of Resident 72's progress notes dated July 27, 2024, at 7:20 a.m. revealed Resident 72 was unable to bear weight and continued to complain of pain in the left lower extremity. Resident 72's nurse practitioner was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct an accurate comprehensive assessment for one of 32 residents reviewed. (Resident 51) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed a quarterly assessment MDS (a minimum data set, which was part of the U.S. federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid-certified nursing homes) dated January 1, 2025, that indicated Resident 51 obtained a stage 2 pressure ulcer (a shallow, open sore or an intact or ruptured blister, with a red or pink wound bed caused by prolonged exposure to pressure) while residing in the facility. Further review of Resident 51's MDS revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Review of Resident 51's clinical records revealed wound care notes dated February 18, 2025, documenting the resident had a skin tear (a traumatic wound that occurs when the top layer of skin separates from the deeper layers) on his/her inner thigh that was being treated with Medihoney (a typical first…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of two residents reviewed regarding oxygen use. (Resident R6) Findings include: Resident R6's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of acute on chronic systolic heart failure (long-term condition that happens when your heart can't pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified (a progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe due to obstruction of airflow). Review of Resident R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) upon admission, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. On March 4, 2025, Resident R6 was observed in their room using supplementary oxygen. Review of Resident R6's clinical records revealed the following order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure discharge instructions included all necessary information, including a recapitulation of stay, resident status, medication reconciliation, living arrangements, follow-up care and individualized care instructions, for a one of three closed records reviewed (Resident 111). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 111 revealed a Nursing Progress Note, dated December 16, 2024, at 5:19 a.m. which indicated that the resident was admitted to [NAME] County Hospital. Admitting diagnosis was unknown at the time. The hospital nurse was unable to disclose information due to resident request. No further information was noted concerning Resident 111's hospital discharge. Continued review of Resident R111's clinical records revealed no discharge summary documenting the resident's personal belongings were returned, their primary physician information, pharmacy information, housing arrangements,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon clinical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a fluid restriction, ordered by resident's physician, was monitored for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 99). Findings include: Review of Resident 99's diagnosis list revealed diagnoses including congestive heart failure (CHF - excessive body/lung fluid caused by a weakened heart muscle) and dementia (irreversible, progressive degenerative disease of the brain, resulting in loss of reality contact and functioning ability). Review of Resident 99's clincal record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an order for a 2-liter (2L) a day fluid restriction. Review of Resident 99's clinical record failed to reveal evidence that nursing was monitoring Resident 99's daily 2L fluid restriction. Interview with the Director of Nursing on March 7, 2025, at 9:35 a.m. confirmed that nursing was not monitoring Resident 99's 2L fluid restriction as ordered by the physician. This interview further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA