Chatham Health & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 81.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 6 sampled residents resulting in a transfer to a higher level of care (Resident #1). The findings included: For Resident #1, the facility staff administered another resident's medication which included five (5) medications used to lower blood pressure, two (2) medications used to lower blood sugar levels, a medication used to prevent blood clots, and an over-the-counter Aspirin resulting in the resident being transferred to a higher level of care with a subsequent 3-day hospital stay including overnight in the intensive care unit (ICU). This was a closed record review. Resident #1's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Osteomyelitis, Hypercalcemia, Essential Hypertension, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/04/24 assigned the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were 3 medication errors in 34 opportunities for a medication error rate of 8.82%. These medication errors affected Resident #3 and #4. The findings included: 1. For Resident #3, the facility staff administered the incorrect dosage of a topical Lidocaine medicated patch and failed to administer a multivitamin with iron according to the medical provider's order. Resident #3's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Chronic Respiratory Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Nontraumatic Ischemic Infarction of Muscle of Left Lower Leg, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Bipolar II Disorder, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/08/24 assigned the resident brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease or infections on 1 of 2 resident care units (200 Hall). The findings included: During a medication pass and pour observation, the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene, administered a tablet that had been dropped on the top of the medication cart, and touched two medications with their bare hands. On 6/11/24 at 8:09 AM, surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 remove a Vitamin D3 gel capsule from a medication cup with their bare fingers and return the capsule to the multi-dose house stock bottle of Vitamin D3. LPN #1 then placed the bottle back into the medication cart. On 6/11/24 at 8:15 AM, surveyor observed LPN #1 assist in repositioning Resident #4 in bed by touching the resident's upper right arm and then administered the resident's medications. LPN #1 did not wash their hands or use hand sanitizer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accurately complete a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 5 closed record reviews, Resident #80. The findings included: The facility staff coded Resident #80's discharge MDS assessment as if they had discharged to a hospital. Resident #80 had discharged home. Resident #80's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute pulmonary edema, and diabetes. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #80's discharge MDS assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/20/24 included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. Section A (identification information) was coded to indicate Resident #80 was discharged to a short-term general hospital. Resident #80's clinical record included a progress note dated 02/20/24 that read in part, Resident discharged home . On 03/20/24 at 10:20 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) #3 reviewed the record with the surveyor and confirmed the MDS was coded incorrectly. RN #3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care consistent with the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 18 residents in the survey sample, resident # 56. The findings included: For resident # 56 the facility staff failed to administer oxygen as ordered by the physician and according to the residents comprehensive person-centered care plan. Diagnoses for resident # 56 included but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension (HTN), history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with left hemiplegia, atrial fibrillation A-fib, anxiety and major depressive disorder. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/9/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident # 56's current orders included an active order dated 7/25/22 for oxygen a 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula. Resident # 56's comprehensive care plan included a problem statement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that residents requiring dialysis services receive care consistent with the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 18 current residents in the survey sample, Resident #9. The findings included: For Resident #9, the facility staff failed to monitor the resident's arteriovenous (AV) fistula hemodialysis access site located in the left arm. Resident #9's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Dementia, and Essential Hypertension. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/19/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #9's current provider orders included an order dated 2/28/24 for Dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. The resident's current comprehensive person-centered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 15 residents in the survey sample, Residents #13 and #11. The findings included: 1. For Resident #13, the facility staff failed to provide treatment to a cellulitis ulceration of the right shin as directed by the Wound Nurse Practitioner from 12/21/23 through 12/28/23. Resident #13's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Cellulitis, and Alcoholic Cirrhosis of Liver. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/24/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #13's comprehensive person-centered care plan included a focus area stating in part . R (right) shin cellulitis ulceration . with an intervention stating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide necessary pressure ulcer treatment consistent with medical provider orders to promote healing for 2 of 15 residents in the survey sample, Resident #8 and #10. The findings included: 1. For Resident #8, the facility staff failed to provide treatment to a sacral pressure ulcer as directed by the Wound Nurse Practitioner. This was a closed record review. Resident #8's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Fracture of Lower End of Left Femur with Routine Healing, Fracture of Left Pubis with Routine Healing, COVID-19, Osteoarthritis of Knee, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery. The admission minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/19/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #8 was coded as being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents are free of significant medication errors, for 1 of 11 current residents in the survey sample, Resident #9. The findings included: For Resident #9, the facility staff failed to administer the intravenous (IV) antibiotic, Ceftriaxone on two separate occasions. Resident #9's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Fournier Disease of Vagina and Vulva, Fournier Gangrene, Chronic Viral Hepatitis C, Sepsis, Acute Kidney Failure with Acute Cortical Necrosis, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Chronic Kidney Disease. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/04/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #9's comprehensive person-centered care plan included a focus area dated 11/29/23 stating Resident has Fournier gangrene open wound to perineum area on IV…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide laboratory services to meet the needs of the resident for 1 of 15 residents in the survey sample, Resident #12. The findings included: For Resident #12, the facility staff failed to obtain a CBC (complete blood count) and a CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel) as requested by the physician on 12/13/23. This was a closed record review. Resident #12's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Metabolic Encephalopathy, Alzheimer's Disease, Bipolar II Disorder, and Muscle Weakness. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/05/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 4 out of 15 indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #12's comprehensive person-centered care plan included an intervention dated 12/03/21 for meds/labs as ordered. Resident #12 was seen by the physician on 12/13/23, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections on one of two resident care units, Hall 200. The findings included: During a medication pass and pour observation, licensed practical nurse (LPN) #3 failed to clean and disinfect a blood glucose monitor using an approved EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) disinfectant. On 1/08/24 at 4:23 PM, surveyor observed LPN #3 obtain Resident #3's blood glucose reading using a blood glucose meter. Resident #3's name was present on the meter and LPN #3 stated each resident had their own personal meter. After obtaining the resident's blood glucose reading, LPN #3 placed the meter into a communal soft-sided bag located in the medication cart without disinfecting the meter. The bag contained multiple resident meters placed together with no separation among the meters. Surveyor then asked LPN #3 if anything…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-06-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA