No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Care Of Chesapeake

715 Argyll St, Chesapeake, VA 23320 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 117 certified beds · (757) 547-4528 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (757) 547-4528 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
560 Kempsville Rd Ste 100 · (757) 335-6230 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
805 Kent Pl · (757) 800-8813 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
475 Kempsville Road · (757) 618-2810 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1003 Warrington Blvd · (757) 410-8692 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
872 Clearfield Ave · (757) 549-2228

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.4%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms25.7%18.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained1.0%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.8%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.5%20.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.3%21.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.0%14.2%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine44.8%73.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.3%22.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.9%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.681.521.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.771.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 335 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 208 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.8%CMS range 55.6–67.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 9.4–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge89.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.9–8.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.791.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
1.24
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.64
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
52.9%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 114.7 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-12-08)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2020-01-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, Resident and staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a Resident call system for Residents to call for staff assistance, on three of four nursing units. The findings included: On three of four nursing units, the facility staff failed to ensure that there was a Resident call system in the bathrooms and showers to allow Residents to call for staff assistance, if needed. On 12/5/23, during an initial tour of the facility it was noted that on three of the Resident care units, there was not a functional call bell system. The Residents were noted to have hand bells and/or tap bells at the bedside. There was no device noted in the Resident bathrooms, many of which also contained showers. During Resident interviews conducted 12/5/23-12/6/23, Resident #54 reported that the toileted and showered in his room's bathroom independently without any supervision or assistance from staff. When asked how he would call for assistance if he needed help, Resident #54 said, I have no way to call other than yell, the system has been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess and determine if a Resident was safe to self-administer medications that were at the bedside, for six Residents (Resident #42, 54, 77, 51, 78 and #7) in a survey sample of 55 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Residents #42, 54, 77, 51, and 78, all of whom had medications stored in their room, the facility staff failed to assess if the Residents were safe to self-administer medications. On [DATE] at approximately 12:00 PM, observations were conducted of the 100 unit. Multiple Residents were noted to have over the counter medications at the bedside. They included: a. Resident #42 had hair growth pills/supplement at bedside. b. Resident #54 had Nutririte-800 multivitamins on the bedside table. The Resident said he takes 2 once a day, and reports he got them from dialysis and has been taking them about a year. c. Resident #77 had refresh lubricating eye…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a safe environment, free of accident hazards on one of four Resident care units. The findings included: On the one hundred nursing unit, the facility failed to secure medications and chemicals to maintain a safe environment, free of accident hazards. 1a. On [DATE] at approximately 12:00 PM, observations were conducted of the 100 unit. Multiple Residents were noted to have over the counter medications at the bedside. They included: a. Resident #42 had hair growth pills/supplement at bedside. b. Resident #54 had Nutririte-800 multivitamins on the bedside table. c. Resident #77 had refresh lubricating eye drops at the bedside and hemorrhoid cream in the bathroom. d. Resident #51 had a tube of hydrocolloid cream and a bottle of [NAME] anti-itch cream on the bedside table. The [NAME] lotion had a prescription label, which indicated it belonged to Resident #394.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, review of the actual working schedules for nurse staff, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure they had a Registered Nurse (RN) providing services at least eight consecutive hours within each twenty-four hour period, 7 days a week. The findings included: The Fiscal Year Quarter 4 2023 (July 1 - September 30) PBJ Staffing Data Report triggered for four or more days within the quarter with no RN hours. A review of eleven months of actual nurse staffing from January 2023 through November 2023 revealed the facility was without an RN on duty eight consecutive hours on 2/12/23, 2/18/23 2/19/23, 3/4/23, 3/11/23, 3/19/23, 4/29/23, 7/9/23, 7/22/23, 7/23/23, 9/3/23, 9/9/23, 9/16/23, 9/30/23, 10/1/23, 10/14/23, 10/15/23, 11/23/23. On 12/7/23 at approximately 4:45 PM an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #11. LPN #11 stated a great deal of effort is expended to obtain RN coverage for the weekends and holidays but it is very challenging and occasionally they are not successful in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. There were 4 medication errors in 26 opportunities, affecting two (2) Residents (Resident #26 and #85), resulting in a 15.38% medication error rate. The findings included: On [DATE] at 8:16 AM, LPN #6 was observed to prepare and administer medications to Resident #26 & at 8:22 AM, administered medications to Resident #85. During the medication administration observation, LPN #6 prepared the medications and provided Resident #26 with 4 medications, Coenzyme Q10 Capsule 100 MG, Coreg Tablet 12.5 MG (Carvedilol), Peridex Mouth/Throat Solution 0.12 % (Chlorhexidine Gluconate (Mouth-Throat), and boost (a nutritional supplement). Following the administration a record review was conducted to reconcile the administration. It was noted that LPN #6 had documented that Lasix Oral Tablet 20 MG (Furosemide), and MiraLAX Packet 17 GM (Polyethylene Glycol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate minimum data set (MDS) assessment for one of fifty five residents in the survey sample (Resident # 62). The findings include: Resident # 62's (R62's) MDS dated [DATE] was incomplete. R62 was admitted with diagnoses that included alzhiemers, depression, dementia with psychotic disturbance, auditory hallucinations and epilepsy. The MDS daated 6/7/23 assessed R62 as being cognitively intact. R62's clinical record documented a MDS dated [DATE]. Sections C0200, C0300, CO400 and CO500 were blank. On 12/7/23 at 9:12 am, the licensed practical nurse MDS coordinator (LPN#4) responsible for completing the MDS was interviewed about R62's incomplete MDS. LPN#4 stated that social services usually completed section C and we help them. LPN#4 also stated the assessment was not completed during the look back period and it got missed. The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual Chapter 3 page…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement care plan interventions for one Resident (Resident #5) in a survey sample of 55 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #5 the facility staff failed to ensure a mattress was at the immediate bedside of the Resident as identified in the care plan as a fall intervention to prevent injury. On 12/5/23 at approximately 12:30 PM, Resident #5 was observed lying in bed. In the room there was an additional mattress noted on the floor, but it was pushed mid-way of the room and not positioned beside the bed. On 12/7/23 at 8:33 AM., Resident #5 was observed again, lying in bed. The additional mattress was noted to be lying on the floor, but not by the bed, it was placed mid-way of the room between the bed and wall. On 12/7/23 at 8:35 AM, an interview was conducted with LPN #7, who is an MDS (minimum data set) nurse. When asked about the mattress in the floor, LPN #7 said it is to be positioned directly beside the bed as a fall precaution to protect from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow standards of practice for two Residents (Resident #85 and #26) in a survey sample of 55 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #85 the facility staff failed to follow standards of nursing practice by failing to implement physician orders to apply compression stockings in the morning for edema. Resident #85 has diagnosis of BLE (bilateral lower extremity) edema and CHF (congestive heart failure), and compression hose ordered for edema to be put on in the morning and removed in the evening. On 12/6/23 in the morning and again in the afternoon, Resident #85 was observed sitting in her room and no compression stockings were on her BLE. On 12/7/23 after lunch, Resident #85 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room and she didn't have on compression stockings. On 12/8/23 in the morning, after breakfast, Resident #85 was observed in her room sitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to respond to a Resident's request for ADL (activity of daily living) assistance for one Resident (Resident #48) in a survey sample of 55 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #48, the facility staff failed to respond to the Resident ringing the tap bell for an hour and a half to request assistance to bathe/wash up. On 12/6/23 at approximately 10:05-10:10 AM, Resident #48 was observed to be ringing her tap bell. The surveyor remained on the unit making ongoing observations and noted no staff entered to respond to the resident. Throughout this time, Resident #48 was ringing the bell. At approximately 11:20 AM, Resident #48 began banging profusely on the bell. On 12/6/23 at 11:29 AM, Resident #48 was asked by the surveyor what she needed and reported she had been waiting for staff to assist her with getting washed up. The Resident reported that this happens frequently that people don't come. She said she has waited as long as 3 hours because some people say they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain quality of care and ensure care was in accordance with the Resident's care plan, for two Residents (Resident #54 and #72), in a survey sample of 55 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #54 and #72, who were both on a fluid restriction, the facility staff failed to maintain the restrictions of the fluid restrictions by providing water at the bedside. On 12/6/23 at approximately 10 AM, observations were made in Resident #54's room. Resident #54 was noted to have a water pitcher at the bedside which was 3/4 full of ice water. It was observed that on the wall behind the bed, a sign noted a 1000 cc fluid restriction. On 12/6/23 at approximately 10:21 AM, observations were made of Resident #72's room. On the over bed table there was a full water pitcher in his room, which contained approximately 960 cc., a 120-cc cup of juice was noted and another cup with approx. 120 cc of liquid was noted. A sign above bed says 1000 cc fluid restriction. On 12/7/23 at 8:23 AM, observations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a medication pass observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration to three (3) of 55 residents in the survey sample (Resident #69, #26, #85) and during a medication pass on one of four units (100 unit). The findings include: 1. Resident #69's medication Janumet was not available for administration resulting in five missed doses of the medication. Resident #69 (R69) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes, cerebral infarction, dysarthria, hypertension, protein-calorie malnutrition and dysphagia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R69 as cognitively intact. Resident #69's clinical record documented a physician's order dated [DATE] for the medication Janumet 50-1000 mg (milligrams) one tablet by mouth two times per day for type 2 diabetes. A physician's order was documented on [DATE] for Janumet 50-1000 mg two times per day via gastric tube for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure medications were stored in a secured location, accessible to designated staff for 7 of 55 residents: Resident #7, Resident #85, Resident #42, Resident #54, Resident #77, Resident #51 and Resident #78 in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Hydrocortisone cream 1 percent (%) was stored in a secured location, accessible to designated staff only. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #7 included but not limited to major depressive disorder. Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/14/23, under cognitive status was not coded on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) but was coded as independent for decisions being consistent and reasonable. During the initial tour of the facility on 12/05/23 at approximately 1:59 p.m., observed on Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family interview, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure transportation arrangements were made for 1 resident's dental appointment in a survey sample of 55 residents (Resident #1). The findings included: Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The current diagnoses included cerebral palsy. The quarterly revised Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 09/07/23 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems as well as severely impaired for daily decision making. In sectionGG(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as being dependent on staff for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, shower and bathing. The person centered care plan created on 8/03/21 read Resident #1 has a potential oral health problem. The goal set for the resident was they will have proper nutrition and hydration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to have advanced directives accessible for five resident's (Resident #68, #14, #7, #45 and #84) in a survey sample of 37 residents. The findings included; 1. Resident #68 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #14 included but not limited to Type 2 diabetes Mellitus and Muscle Weakness. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a Quarterly Revision assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/08/2019. The staff assessment for mental Status coded the Resident as having Short term and Long term memory problems. Section C1000-Coded the Resident's Cognitive Skills for Decision Making as being severely impaired. A review of the clinical record on 01/08/2019 revealed there was no advanced directive in the clinical record concerning an advance directive. On 1/9/20 at 1:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #4 the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 hours, 7 days a week. The facility staff failed to ensure RN coverage for 8 hours for four days. The findings included: On 01/09/20 at approximately 2:00 PM, the facility's actual worked schedule was reviewed with the DON (Director of Nursing) and revealed there was no RN coverage for the following days: 1/19/19, 1/20/19, 5/5/19, 5/27/19. The DON was asked what should have been done concerning providing Registered Nursing Coverage? He stated, We should have gotten RN coverage. On 01/09/20 at approximately, 7:12 PM a pre-exit interview was conducted with The Director of Nursing (DON), the ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) and the facility Administrator concerning the above issue. No further information was provided by the facility staff.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected 1 of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #48. The findings included: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease With Late Onset and Anxiety Disorder. Resident #48's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/21/2019 coded Resident #48 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 03. indicating severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #48 as requiring extensive assistance of 1 with eating, total dependence with assistance of 1 for dressing, personal hygiene and bathing and total dependence with assistance of 2 for bed mobility, transfer and toilet use. On 01/09/2019 at approximately 4:30 p.m., review of Resident #48's clinical record revealed the following: Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to follow physician orders and the comprehensive care plan for oxygen administration for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #12. The facility staff failed to administer the correct amount of oxygen per nasal cannula. The findings included: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Respiratory Failure. Resident #12's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a Quarterly Revision assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/10/19. Resident #12 was coded as being intact in cognitive function scoring 12 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Resident #12 was coded in section O, Special Treatments and Programs, as receiving respiratory therapy. Review of Resident #12's POS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to follow orders to change the nebulizer tubing every 7 days as ordered and failed to administer oxygen per physician orders, for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #12. The findings included: 1a. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Respiratory Failure. Resident #12's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a Quarterly Revision assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/10/19. Resident #12 was coded as being intact in cognitive function scoring 12 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Resident #12 was coded in section O, Special Treatments and Programs, as receiving respiratory therapy. Review of Resident #12's POS (physician order summary) dated 12/27/ 2019,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during wound care for 1 of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #302. The findings included: Resident #302 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, Cerebral Ischemia and Unspecified Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. Resident #302's Nurse admission Evaluation with an evaluation date of 12/30/2019 revealed that the resident was AOx4 (Alert and Oriented times 4). In addition, the Nurse admission Evaluation revealed that the resident was evaluated as requiring assistance of 1 with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living). On 01/08/2020 at 11:35 a.m., Resident #302's wound care was observed. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, Wound Care Nurse, was assisting the physician during wound care. LPN #3 performed hand hygiene and then placed a barrier on the bedside table top. LPN #3 obtained needed wound care supplies from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-10-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. For Resident #35 the facility staff failed to ensure Foley catheter tubing was anchored. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, heart failure, pressure ulcer of sacral region, and encounter for palliative care. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/17/18 coded the Resident 00 of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. Resident #35's CCP (comprehensive care plan) was reviewed and contained a focus area of requires urinary catheter related to wound on sacrum. Interventions included but were not limited to, maintain drainage bag below the bladder level, and change catheter and draining system as indicated by the physician. Resident #35's clinical record was reviewed on 10/17/18. It contained a physician's order summary which read in part, Anchor catheter tubing and check placement every shift. Resident #35 was observed by the surveyor on 10/16/18 at approximately 11:02…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-10-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident # 21's insulin (Basaglar) was available for administration. The clinical record of Resident #21 was reviewed 10/16/18 through 10/18/18. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility 9/20/17 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus, symbolic dysfunction, dysphagia, repeated falls, cardiomyopathy, cerebellar stroke syndrome, alcohol-induced chronic pancreatitis, chronic pain syndrome, anemia, transient ischemic attacks, gastric diverticulum, altered mental status, Barrett's esophagus without dysplasia, hypertension, hemiplegia affecting left dormant side, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, acute respiratory infection, viral hepatitis without hepatic coma, and cerebral infarction due to embolism. Resident #21's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/7/18 assessed the resident with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) as 15/15. Resident #21's current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-10-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 9 of 26 Residents were free of unnecessary medications. Residents #66, #89, #90, #100, #21, #28, #33, #59, #42. The findings included: 1. For Resident #66, staff failed to ensure the resident received an anti-psychotic medication only to treat specific conditions and symptoms as documented in the clinical record. Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, dysphagia, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere without behavioral disturbance, cerebral infarction due to embolism of other cerebral artery, type II diabetes mellitus without complications, essential primary hypertension, other specified anxiety disorders, major depressive disorders, insomnia, and chest pain. On the quarterly minimum data set assessment with assessment reference date 9/17/18, the resident scored 15/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was assessed as without symptoms of delirium,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure call bell was in reach for 1 of 26 Residents, Resident #31. The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure that that the call bell remained within reach for Resident # 31. Resident # 31 is a [AGE] year-old-female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 11/07/17. Diagnoses included but were not limited to muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and unspecified fracture of sacrum. The clinical record for Resident #31 was reviewed on 11/16/18 at approximately 3:23pm. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/14/18 coded the Resident as 15 of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. Section G assesses functional status. In Section G0110, the facility staff documented that Resident #31 required extensive assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate DDNR (durable do not resuscitate) order for 1 of 26 Residents Resident #8. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure the Residents DDNR was complete. Section's 1 and 2 had been left blank. The clinical record review revealed that Resident #8 had been admitted to the facility 08/13/13. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, hypothyroidism, nutritional deficiency, chronic pain syndrome, hypertension, and heart failure. Section C (cognitive patterns) of the Residents significant change MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 07/06/18 had been coded 1/1/2 to indicate the Resident had problems with long and short term memory and was moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. Section O (special treatments, procedures, and programs) had been coded to indicate the Resident was receiving hospice services. The Residents clinical record included a DDNR order form from the Virginia Department…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide advance notice of end of coverage in regards to medicare benefits for 1 of 26 Residents, Resident #74. The findings included: The facility failed to provide Resident #74 advance notice that the medicare part A services were ending. The clinical record review revealed that Resident #74 had been readmitted to the facility 03/23/18. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, muscle weakness, nutritional deficiency, major depressive disorder, chronic pain, anxiety disorder, glaucoma, and bipolar disorder. Section C (cognitive patterns) of the Residents quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/27/18 included a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) summary score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. Resident #74 was one of three residents chosen for the task beneficiary protection notification review. The facility provided the surveyor with two forms regarding this task and this resident: 1. SNFABN (skilled nursing facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete a discharge MDS (minimum data set) assessment for 1 of 26 Residents, Resident #2. The findings included: The facility failed to complete a discharge MDS assessment. The Resident had been discharged from the facility on 06/29/18. The record review revealed that Resident #2 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE], and discharged on 06/29/18. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, muscle weakness, dysphagia, depressive disorder, heart failure, and hypertension. Section C (cognitive patterns) of the Residents quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 05/21/18 included a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) summary score of 12 out of a possible 15 points. Resident #2 was flagged in the long-term care survey process as having an overdue MDS assessment. A review of the EHR (electronic health record) revealed that this Resident had been discharged from the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-18 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility failed to complete a level 1 PASARR (preadmission screening and annual resident review) for 1 of 26 Residents, Resident #74. The findings included: The facility failed to ensure a level 1 PASARR was completed. A PASARR is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care. The clinical record review revealed that Resident #74 had been readmitted to the facility 03/23/18. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, muscle weakness, nutritional deficiency, major depressive disorder, chronic pain, anxiety disorder, glaucoma, and bipolar disorder. Section C (cognitive patterns) of the Residents quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/27/18 included a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) summary score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. During the clinical record review, the surveyor was unable to locate a PASARR in the Residents EHR (electronic health record). On 10/16/18 at 4:43 p.m., the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 2 of 26 residents (Resident #33 and Resident #66). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to develop a care plan for comfort care for Resident #33. The clinical record of Resident #33 was reviewed 10/16/18 through 10/18/18. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, that included but not limited to hypomagnesia, insomnia, chronic pain syndrome, dry eye syndrome, hypertension, chronic diastolic heart failure, lymphedema, acute frontal sinusitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, urinary tract infection, left knee hemarthosis, right elbow contracture, major depressive disorder, nutritional deficiency, and dysthymic disorder. Resident #33's significant change in minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/16/18 assessed the resident with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) as 12 out of 15 in Section C. The October 2018 physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide mouth care to 1 of 26 residents (Resident #59). The findings included: The facility staff failed to provide mouth care to Resident #59. The clinical record of Resident #59 was reviewed 10/16/18 through 10/18/18. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility 8/12/17 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, severe sepsis with shock, dysphagia, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, obsessive compulsive personality disorder, rhabdomyolysis, end stage renal disease, anxiety disorder, mental disorder, repeated falls, hyperkalemia, urinary tract infection, Parkinson's disease, and major depressive disorder. Resident #59's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/12/18 assessed the resident with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) as 9/15. Section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 25 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 90. The findings included: The facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for dressing changes twice a day for Resident # 90. Resident # 90 was an [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 3/5/18. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: osteoarthritis, cellulitis of right lower limb, hypertension, and non-pressure chronic ulcer of right lower leg. The clinical record for Resident # 90 was reviewed on 10/17/18 at 9:51 am. The most recent MDS assessment (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD date (assessment reference date) of 9/28/18. Section C of the MDS assesses cognitive patterns. In Section C0500, the facility staff documented that Resident # 90 had a BIMS score (brief interview for mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide appropriate treatments for pressure ulcers for 3 of 26 residents (Resident #33, Resident #56 and Resident #97). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to provide treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from forming for Resident #33. The clinical record of Resident #33 was reviewed 10/16/18 through 10/18/18. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, that included but not limited to hypomagnesia, insomnia, chronic pain syndrome, dry eye syndrome, hypertension, chronic diastolic heart failure, lymphedema, acute frontal sinusitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, urinary tract infection, left knee hemarthosis, right elbow contracture, major depressive disorder, nutritional deficiency, and dysthymic disorder. Resident #33's significant change in minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a hazard free environment for 1 of 26 residents (Resident #28). The findings included: The facility staff failed to follow the physician order for bilateral floor mats for Resident #28. The clinical record of Resident #28 was reviewed 10/16/18 through 10/18/18. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility 9/7/16 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to symbolic dysfunction, dysphagia, right shoulder contracture, major depressive disorder, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, seizures, iron deficiency anemia, urine retention, anxiety disorder, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, peripheral vascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, bradycardia, diabetic neuropathy, chronic pain syndrome, paraplegia, acute renal failure, gastritis, bacteremia, hyperkalemia, insomnia, and hypertension. Resident #28's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-18 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to obtain orders in regards to PICC line dressing changes for 1 of 26 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 100. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident # 100 had orders for PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line dressing changes. Resident # 100 was a [AGE] year-old-female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: MRSA (methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus), Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and muscle weakness. The clinical record for Resident # 100 was reviewed on 10/16/18 at 11:22 am. During the time of the survey, there was no completed MDS assessment (minimum data set) for Resident # 100. The plan of care for Resident # 100 was reviewed and revised on 10/16/18. The facility staff documented a focus area for Resident # 100 as, Resident # 100 is on antibiotic therapy related to MRSA to left elbow.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide non-pharmacological interventions in regards to pain management for 3 of 26 Residents in the survey sample, Resident #100, Resident #90, and Resident #21. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to provided non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of PRN (as needed) pain medication for Resident # 100. Resident # 100 was a [AGE] year-old-female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: MRSA (methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus), Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and muscle weakness. The clinical record for Resident # 100 was reviewed on 10/16/18 at 11:22 am. During the time of the survey, there was no completed MDS assessment (minimum data set) for Resident # 100. The current plan of care for Resident # 100 was reviewed and revised on 10/15.18. The facility staff documented a focus area for Resident # 100 as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Facility staff failed to address the resident's dementia and its treatment with antipsychotic medications in the plan of care for 1 of 26 residents in the survey sample (Resident #66). The findings included: Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, dysphagia, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere without behavioral disturbance, cerebral infarction due to embolism of other cerebral artery, type II diabetes mellitus without complications, essential primary hypertension, other specified anxiety disorders, major depressive disorders, insomnia, and chest pain. On the quarterly minimum data set assessment with assessment reference date 9/17/18, the resident scored 15/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was assessed as without symptoms of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. The resident's medication assessment was coded under Medications received (N0410 A) as receiving anti-psychotic medications 7 of the 7 days prior to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to follow up on pharmacy recommendations for 1 of 26 Residents, Resident #35. Findings included: For Resident #35, the facility failed to provide evidence that the attending nurse practitioner had reviewed a pharmacy recommendation dated 08/23/18. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, heart failure, pressure ulcer of sacral region, and encounter for palliative care. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/17/18 coded the Resident 00 of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. The DON (director of nursing) provided the surveyor with a copy of a pharmacy recommendation dated 08/23/18. The attending nurse practitioner that it was addressed to had not signed the recommendation. On 10/18/18 at approximately 2:30pm, the DON (director of nursing) verbalized to the surveyor that a pharmacy review was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 26 residents was free of an unnecessary medication (Resident #33). The findings included: The facility staff failed to follow the physician ordered parameters for the administration of Metoprolol for Resident #33. The clinical record of Resident #33 was reviewed 10/16/18 through 10/18/18. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, that included but not limited to hypomagnesia, insomnia, chronic pain syndrome, dry eye syndrome, hypertension, chronic diastolic heart failure, lymphedema, acute frontal sinusitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, urinary tract infections, left knee hemarthosis, right elbow contracture, major depressive disorder, nutritional deficiency, and dysthymic disorder. Resident #33's significant change in minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/16/18 assessed the resident with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) as 12 out of 15 in Section C.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and during a medication pass and pour observation, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were 2 errors in 28 opportunities for a medication error rate of 7.14%. These errors effected Resident #101. The findings included: The facility nursing staff failed to administer the Residents miralax and eye drops. The record review revealed that Resident #101 had been admitted to the facility 10/15/18. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, blindness left eye, transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarcon without residual deficits, and acute appendicitis. There was no completed MDS (minimum data set) assessment completed on this Resident. The Resident was alert and orientated. On 10/17/18 beginning at approximately 7:53 a.m., the surveyor observed LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2 prepare and administer the following medications amlodipine, carvedilol, furosemide, lisinopril, cipro, iron, aspirin, thera tab vitamin, and a PPD to Resident #101. After observing the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 2 of 26 Residents were free of significant medication errors. Residents #72 and #21 Findings included: 1. For Resident #72 the facility staff failed to administer blood pressure medication as ordered by the physician. Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to hypertension, diabetes mellitus, depression, cerebral infarction due to embolism, and chronic kidney disease. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/26/18 coded the Resident as 15 of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This is a quarterly MDS. Resident #72's CCP (comprehensive care plan) was reviewed and contained a focus area for Resident has altered cardiac status, has interventions that included but were not limited to, Administer medications as directed by the physician. Resident #72's clinical record was reviewed on 10/17/18. It contained a POS (physician's order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-18 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to obtain physician ordered laboratory tests for 3 of 26 residents (Resident #21, Resident #33, and Resident #56). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to obtain a physician ordered urinalysis, culture, and sensitivity for Resident #21. The clinical record of Resident #21 was reviewed 10/16/18 through 10/18/18. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility 9/20/17 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus, symbolic dysfunction, dysphagia, repeated falls, cardiomyopathy, cerebellar stroke syndrome, alcohol-induced chronic pancreatitis, chronic pain syndrome, anemia, transient ischemic attacks, gastric diverticulum, altered mental status, Barrett's esophagus without dysplasia, hypertension, hemiplegia affecting left dormant side, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, acute respiratory infection, viral hepatitis without hepatic coma, and cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-18 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to obtain a physician order prior to obtaining laboratory tests for 1 of 26 residents (Resident #59). The findings included: The facility staff failed to obtain a physician order before the CBC (complete blood count) and BMP (basic metabolic panel) were obtained on 9/18/18 for Resident #59. The clinical record of Resident #59 was reviewed 10/16/18 through 10/18/18. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility 8/12/17 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, severe sepsis with shock, dysphagia, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, obsessive compulsive personality disorder, rhabdomyolysis, end stage renal disease, anxiety disorder, mental disorder, repeated falls, hyperkalemia, urinary tract infection, Parkinson's disease, and major depressive disorder. Resident #59's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for 3 of 26 Residents, Residents #21, #31, and #249. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure the physician's orders for PROM (passive range of motion) were entered into the computer accurately for Resident #21. The clinical record of Resident #21 was reviewed 10/16/18 through 10/18/18. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility 9/20/17 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus, symbolic dysfunction, dysphagia, repeated falls, cardiomyopathy, cerebellar stroke syndrome, alcohol-induced chronic pancreatitis, chronic pain syndrome, anemia, transient ischemic attacks, gastric diverticulum, altered mental status, Barrett's esophagus without dysplasia, hypertension, hemiplegia affecting left dormant side, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, acute respiratory infection, viral hepatitis without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2018-10-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespread
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were prepared, reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team that included the necessary members. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure that all facility residents care plans were prepared by an interdisciplinary team that included nursing assistants. On 10/16/18 at 4:40 pm, the surveyor observed a Care Plan Conference Summary sheet in the clinical record for Resident # 89. The surveyor observed several signatures documented under the Attendees of Care Plan Conference section. The surveyor did not observe a documented signature of a certified nursing assistant. On 10/16/18 at 5:03 pm, the surveyor interviewed unit manager RN # 1 (registered nurse). The surveyor asked RN # 1 if she could identify the titles of the persons listed as attending the care plan conference. RN # 1 identified the attendees as the social worker, dietary, herself RN #1, activity director, and Resident # 89's daughter.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Bryn Mawr Extended Care CenterBryn Mawr, PA 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, PA 1 of 5Gastonia Health & Rehab CenterGastonia, NC 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab CenterJohnstown, PA 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazleton, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5University Manor Health & RehaCleveland, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Health & Rehab CenterMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MadisonMadison, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MechanicsvilleMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SHG AUTUMN, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 03/01/2016
OHI ASSETT (VA) CHESAPEAKE, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
JACKSON, ASHLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/28/2022
WHITENACK, JILLENEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/26/2025
CIBC BANK USAOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2021
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
SHG MT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/14/2025
WALKER & ASSOCIATES PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
STORNELLI, KATHLEENIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 4%Medicare 11%Other / private 85%

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$330per resident / day
operating cost
$10,035per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$347per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495256. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-12-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next