No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Tyler's Retreat At Iron Bridge

12001 Iron Bridge Rd, Chester, VA 23831 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (804) 706-1023 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (804) 706-1023 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Aug 2021Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
12254 Branders Creek Dr · (804) 271-8990 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
12000 Iron Bridge Rd · (804) 768-0273 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
12211 Iron Bridge Rd
Park
5300 Ecoff Ave · (804) 748-1623 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
12501 Life Trl · (804) 748-2224

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.4%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms33.8%18.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury9.4%3.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.1%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.9%20.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.4%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.9%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.2%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.2%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine33.5%73.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.1%22.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.6%11.5%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 258 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.48U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 112 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.0%CMS range 54.5–65.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 6.8–12.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge88.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.7%CMS range 3.6–9.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.85
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
45.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 86.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-13)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement bed rail requirements for four of 36 residents in the survey sample, Residents #6, #100, #101, and #102. The findings include: 1. For Resident #6 (R6), the facility staff failed to assess the resident for risk of entrapment and failed to attempt appropriate alternatives prior to the resident's use of bed rails (grab bars).On 8/11/25 at 12:44 p.m., R6 was observed lying in bed with bilateral grab bars in the upright position.A review of R6's clinical record (including an enabler-restraint observation form dated 7/3/25) failed to reveal documentation that the facility staff assessed the resident for risk of entrapment or attempted appropriate alternatives.On 8/12/25 at 3:12 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #1. LPN #1 stated the facility staff does not assess residents for risk of entrapment or attempt alternative devices for residents who use grab bars.On 8/12/25 at 4:49 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1 (the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement hospital transfer requirements for two of 36 residents in the survey sample, Residents #96 and #5.The findings include:1. For Resident #96 (R96), the facility staff failed to provide a bed hold notice when the resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. A review of R96's clinical record revealed a nurse's note dated 12/27/24 that documented, MD (Medical Doctor) made this nurse aware of need to send resident to ER for evaluation of right jaw swelling. Resident noted to have increased edema of right jaw and MD concerned re: cellulitis or an abscess . Further review of R96's clinical record failed to reveal the resident/resident representative was provided a written notice of the bed hold policy. On 8/12/25 at 3:12 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #1. LPN #1 stated a copy of the bed hold policy is supposed to go with the resident when a resident is sent to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services for two of 36 residents in the survey sample, Residents #100, and #102. The findings include: 1. For Resident #100 (R100), the facility staff failed to store a nebulizer (1) mask in a sanitary manner.R100's admission minimum data set assessment was not complete. An admission observation form dated 8/6/25 documented R100 was oriented, the resident's memory was intact, and the resident's thinking was clear and organized. A review of R100's physician's order revealed an order dated 8/8/25 for ipratropium-albuterol inhalation solution (2) for nebulization, 0.5mg (milligrams)-3mg (2.5mg base)/ 3ml (milliliters) every six hours times 72 hours for shortness of breath/wheezing.On 8/11/25 at 4:05 p.m., R100 was observed lying in bed. The resident's nebulizer mask was uncovered and was sitting against the nebulizer machine on top of the resident's nightstand. R100 stated she used the nebulizer mask and staff had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement a pain management program consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #63. The findings include:On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/2/2025, the resident scored two out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating they were severely impaired for making daily decisions. It further documented R63 receiving as needed pain medications and not having pain in the past five days.The physician orders for R63 documented in part, Morphine concentrate (1) 100mg(milligram)/5ml(milliliter) (20mg/ml); 0.25ml oral every 4 hours PRN (as needed) pain/SOB (shortness of breath). Before: Pain; Non-Pharm Intervent(s). Start date: 08/27/2024. The orders also documented, Acetaminophen [OTC] (over the counter) (2) tablet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for one of 11 residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to notify the physician of a change in condition reported by physical therapy to the nurse. R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses with diagnoses that included but were not limited to diarrhea, unspecified and aftercare following joint replacement surgery. A physical therapy note dated 5/13/2024 documented in part, .Patient supine in bed upon arrival, reports that she is thirsty but cannot seem to take a sip of water and states she is spilling it on herself, nursing notified with BP (blood pressure) assessed 100/60, patient requested therapist to return later to complete session after therapist provided positioning with pillows in the bed with max A (maximal assistance). Call button in hand . A physician progress note dated 5/13/2024 documented in part, .Chief Complaint/Reason…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow the comprehensive care plan for two of 11 residents in the survey sample, Resident #4 (R4) and R11. The findings include: 1a. For R4, facility staff failed to follow the comprehensive care plan for the placement of fall mats. R4 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to hemiplegia (1) and hemiparesis (2). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 03/15/2023, R4 scored 5 (five) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R4 was severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. On 06/11/2024 at 1:35 p.m., an observation of R4 revealed he was laying on his bed in his room. Observation of the fall mats in the room revealed one fall mat was on the floor next to the left side of the bed and the other fall mat was folded in half, standing on edge at the foot of the bed. The comprehensive care plan for R4 dated 06/22/2023 documented in part, Focus.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of quality for one of 11 residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to evidence insertion and monitoring of a hypodermoclysis (1) infusion on 5/13/24-5/14/24. R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses with diagnoses that included but were not limited to diarrhea, unspecified and aftercare following joint replacement surgery. A physician progress note dated 5/13/2024 documented in part, .Chief Complaint/Reason for this Visit: follow-up on the followings: patient reporting multiple issues and concerns health related: #1 diarrhea, persistent, watery, no hematochezia, no fever . #2 persistent decreased oral intake. Decreased water intake. My mouth is dry. #4 and my appetite is not good. #5 Rehabilitation team reported blood pressure lying in bed is 100/60. #6 Feeling weak and dry mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and/or representative interview, clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care to dependent residents for two of 11 residents in the survey sample, Resident #4 and Resident #11. The findings include: 1. For Resident #4 (R4), the facility staff failed to provide incontinence care. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/15/2024, the resident scored 5 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. Section GG documented R4 having impairment on one side in the upper and lower extremity and being dependent for toileting. On 6/10/2024 at 1:18 p.m., an interview was conducted with R4's responsible party (RP). R4's RP voiced concerns regarding the resident being left soiled for extended periods of time and being found wet when they arrived to visit frequently. R4's RP stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain the resident's highest level of well-being for 2 (two) of 11 residents in the survey sample, Resident #2 (R2) and R1. The findings include: 1. For R2, the facility staff failed to obtain physician orders for the treatment of a surgical wound in a timely manner. R2 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/13/2023, R2 scored 8 (eight) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R2 was moderately impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. The physician's order for R2 documented in part, Change dressing to abd (abdomen) daily on evening shift. Every evening shift for Wound care. Order Date: 06/13/2023 Start Date: 06/14/2023. The eTAR (electronic treatment administration record) dated June 2023 for R2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the physician failed to oversee the resident's plan of care for 3 (three) of 5 (five) days for Resident #2. The findings include: For R2, the physician to provide assessments and treatments for a surgical wound. R2 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/13/2023, R2 scored 8 (eight) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R2 was moderately impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. The physician's order for R2 documented in part, Change dressing to abd (abdomen) daily on evening shift. Every evening shift for Wound care. Order Date: 06/13/2023 Start Date: 06/14/2023. The eTAR (electronic treatment administration record) dated June 2023 for R2 documented the physician's order for abdominal daily dressing changes as stated above. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow the comprehensive care plan for one of four residents in the survey sample; Resident #3. The findings include: For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to obtain weights per the comprehensive care plan. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the diagnoses of but not limited to protein-calorie malnutrition and nutritional/metabolic disease. The most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 7/26/23 and coded the resident as severely cognitively impaired in ability to make daily life decisions, scoring a 5 out of a possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status). The resident was coded as requiring supervision for eating. The facility policy, Comprehensive Care Planning Policy was reviewed. This policy documented, .D. All staff must be familiar with each resident's Care Plan and all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to monitor a resident's weight to ensure nutritional status was maintained for one of four residents in the survey sample; Resident #3. The findings include: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the diagnoses of but not limited to protein-calorie malnutrition and nutritional/metabolic disease. The most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 7/26/23 and coded the resident as severely cognitively impaired in ability to make daily life decisions, scoring a 5 out of a possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status). The resident was coded as requiring supervision for eating. A review of the physician's orders revealed one dated 8/3/22 for Weight on admission and then weekly x 4 one time a day every Thu (Thursday) for monitor weight for 4 weeks. There were no further orders for weights once this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-19 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide written notice of a hospital transfer to the Resident Representative and/or State Long Term Care Ombudsman office for four of 30 residents in the survey sample; Residents #1, #8, #35, and #72. The findings include: 1. For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to evidence a written notification of a hospital transfer was provided to the resident representative and to the State Long Term Care Ombudsman office for a hospital transfer on 10/19/22; and failed to evidence a written notification of a hospital transfer was provided to the resident representative for a hospital transfer on 12/8/22. A. A review of the clinical record was conducted for Resident #1. Resident #1 was transferred to the emergency room on [DATE] for further evaluation and treatment of anemia. The clinical record failed to reveal any evidence that a written notification of this hospital transfer was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive care plan for five of 30 residents in the survey sample, Residents #123, #23, #1, #21 and #68. The findings include: 1. For R123, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for the administration of medications per the physician order. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a Medicare five-day assessment, with an assessment reference date of 9/8/2022, the resident scored a 7 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. In Section N - Medications the resident was coded as receiving antidepressants during the look back period. The comprehensive care plan dated 8/18/2022, documented in part, Resident has altered cardiac status. The Interventions documented in part,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide one of 30 residents in the survey sample the opportunity to formulate an advance directive (1); Resident #11. The findings include: For Resident #11 (R11), the facility staff failed to fully review advance directives with the resident and/or the representative, and provide an opportunity to formulate an advanced directive. R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/16/2022, the resident scored 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Review of R11's clinical record failed to evidence documentation of advanced directive review. The progress notes documented periodic review of DNR (do not resuscitate) status. The comprehensive care plan for R11 documented in part,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the physician when physician ordered medications were not administered for one of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident #123 (R123). The findings include: The facility staff failed to notify the physician when antibiotics, antidepressants and medications for cholesterol were not administered per the physician order for R123. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a Medicare five-day assessment, with an assessment reference date of 9/8/2022, the resident scored a 7 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. In Section N - Medications the resident was coded as receiving antidepressants and antibiotics during the look back period. The physician orders dated 8/17/2022, documented the following: Lipitor (Atorvastatin) (used to treat high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence that all required documentation was provided to the receiving facility for hospital transfers for three of 30 residents in the survey sample; Residents #1, #8, and #72. The findings include: 1. For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to evidence that all, if any, required documentation was provided to the receiving facility upon a hospital transfer on 12/8/22. A review of the clinical record was conducted for Resident #1. Resident #1 was transferred to the emergency room on [DATE] for further evaluation and treatment for uncontrolled abdominal pain. Further review of the clinical record failed to reveal any evidence that the required documentation was provided to the receiving facility. On 1/19/23 at 9:36 AM an interview was conducted with ASM #2 (Administrative Staff Member) the Director of Nursing. She stated that there was no evidence of what documentation was sent.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident #10. The findings include: For Resident #10 (R10), the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan after a self-harm incident on 7/22/2022. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/23/2022, the resident scored 5 of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. Section E documented no behaviors. The progress notes for R10 documented in part, - 7/22/2022 21:30 (9:30 p.m.) Nursing note. Note Text: While doing rounds CNA (certified nursing assistant) found patient in his room crying and making an apparent attempt to commit suicide. Patient had a small cutting tool resembling a pocket knife and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration. to clarify a physician order for one of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident #123 (R123). The findings include: The facility staff failed to clarify a physician order for the administration time of an IV (intravenous) antibiotic for Resident #123 (R123). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a Medicare five-day assessment, with an assessment reference date of 9/8/2022, the resident scored a 7 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. In Section N - Medications the resident was coded as receiving antidepressants and antibiotics during the look back period. The physician order dated, 8/17/2022, documented, Ceftriaxone Sodium Solution Reconstituted 2 GM (grams) (used to treat infections) (1),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence a complete discharge summary for one of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident #70. The findings include: For Resident #70 (R70), the facility staff failed to evidence a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, a final summary of the resident's status at the time of discharge, reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post discharge medications, and a post discharge plan of care for the discharge on [DATE]. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a discharge assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/27/2022, the resident was coded as being severely impaired for making daily decisions. The progress notes for R70 documented in part, 10/27/2022 11:31 (11:31 a.m.) Note Text: Resident discharged home left via transportation van with attendant. Resident took all her belongings with her at discharge.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain a physician order and provide treatment to promote non-recurrence of a healed pressure injury for one of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident #23. The findings include: For Resident #23 (R23), the facility staff failed to transcribe orders and provide treatment for a healed Stage 3 pressure injury (1). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/15/2022, the resident scored 3 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. Section M documented R23 having one Stage 3 pressure injury. The progress notes for R23 documented in part, - 1/10/2023 07:00 (7:00 a.m.) Note Text: Wound type is pressure. Stage: 3 Wound Location L (left) heel .Treatment: Wound care to left heel as follows: apply skin prep q (every) shift. Area is resolved skin prep q shift ppx (prophylaxis). The weekly wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement fall interventions per the plan of care for two of 30 residents in the survey sample; Residents #21 and #23. The findings include: 1. For Resident #21, the facility staff failed to ensure bilateral fall mats were in place per the plan of care. A review of the comprehensive care plan revealed one dated 3/23/21 for Actual fall; Risk for further falls . This care plan included an intervention dated 7/19/21 for Fall mats on both sides of bed. A review of the clinical record revealed the January 2023 eTAR (electronic treatment administration record) which included an item dated 7/20/21 for Fall Matts [sic] to each side of the bed for safety while in bed every shift for preventative. This document identified Day Evening and Night as three opportunities each day for staff to sign off that placement of the fall mats had been verified. Staff had completed this sign off each day through 1/18/23 (the date of survey review). Observations of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to administer oxygen per physician's orders for one of 30 residents in the survey sample; Resident #1. The findings include: For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to administer oxygen at 3 liters per minute as per the physician's order. A review of the clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 10/20/22 for Oxygen 3LPM (liters per minute) via nasal cannula every shift . On 1/17/23 at 12:00 PM and at 2:25 PM, observations of the resident revealed the oxygen rate on the oxygen concentrator flow meter was set at 1.5 liters as evidenced by the ball of the flow meter centered on the line between the 1 and 2 liter marks. A review of the comprehensive care plan revealed one dated 8/27/21 for Resident is receiving continuous oxygen therapy. This care plan included an intervention dated 8/27/21 for Administer oxygen as ordered. On 1/19/23 at 10:00 AM an interview was conducted with LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) #2 . She stated that when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide dialysis care and services for one of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident #68. The findings include: The facility failed to provide communication to the dialysis facility for 1 of 1 visits in December 2022 (12/30/22) and 3 of 7 visits in January 2023 (1/2/23, 1/4/23 and 1/6/23); and failed to evidence monitoring of the bruit (swishing sound) and thrill (vibration) in the left upper arm fistula. Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a Medicare five-day assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/3/23, coded the resident as scoring a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure eight consecutive hours of RN (registered nurse) coverage on three of 34 days reviewed. The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure eight consecutive hours of RN coverage for three days, 8/13/2022, 9/4/2022 and 9/18/2022. Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report for 7/1/2022-9/30/2022 revealed concerns related to the facility's requirement to have a Registered Nurse on duty for at least 8 consecutive hours a day. The report documented no RN hours on 7/31/2022, 8/13/2022, 8/14/2022, 9/4/2022 and 9/18/2022. On 1/17/2023 at approximately 11:14 a.m., during entrance conference, ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator stated that the facility did not have any staffing waivers in place in the facility. On 1/17/2023 at approximately 12:00 p.m., a request was made to ASM #1 for evidence of RN coverage for the dates listed above. On 1/17/2023 at 12:52 p.m., ASM #1 provided time card reports for the dates listed above and stated that they did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure one of 30 residents in the survey sample was free of a significant mediation error, Resident #123 (R123). The findings include: For R123, the facility staff failed to administer an intravenous (IV) antibiotic on 8/17/2022. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a Medicare five-day assessment, with an assessment reference date of 9/8/2022, the resident scored a 7 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. In Section N - Medications the resident was coded as receiving antidepressants and antibiotics during the look back period. The physician order dated, 8/17/2022, documented, Ceftriaxone Sodium Solution Reconstituted 2 GM (grams) (used to treat infections) (1), Use 2000 milligrams intravenously every 24 hours related to abscess of liver for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 30 residents in the survey sample; Resident #21. The findings include: For Resident #21, the facility staff failed to ensure accurate documentation regarding the placement of fall mats. Observations of Resident #21 on 1/17/23 at 10:57 AM, 1/17/23 at 2:30 PM, 1/18/23 at 11:49 AM, 1/18/23 at 3:51 PM, and 1/19/23 at 8:38 AM, all revealed Resident #21 in the bed. There were no fall mats down and no evidence of fall mats anywhere in the room. A review of the clinical record revealed the January 2023 eTAR (electronic treatment administration record.) This document included an item dated 7/20/21 for Fall Matts [sic] to each side of the bed for safety while in bed every shift for preventative. This document identified Day Evening and Night as three opportunities each day for staff to sign off that placement of the fall mats had been verified. Staff had completed this sign off each day through 1/18/23. On 1/19/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a bedpan in a clean and sanitary manner for one of 30 residents in the survey sample; Resident #35. The findings include: Observations were made of Resident #35 on 1/17/23 at 11:36 AM, 1/17/23 at 2:30 PM, 1/18/23 at 11:49 AM, 1/18/23 at 3:51 PM, and 1/19/23 at 8:38 AM. In the resident's bathroom was a bedpan, unlabeled (whether for Resident #35 or for their roommate), and unbagged, sitting directly on the floor. On 1/18/23 at 4:22 PM, an interview was conducted with LPN #4 (Licensed Practical Nurse). She stated that Resident #35 started using the bedpan upon return from a hospital visit after surgery a couple months prior, and still used it sometimes. On 1/19/23 at 10:00 AM an interview was conducted with LPN #2 (Licensed Practical Nurse). She stated that the bedpan should be in plastic bag in the bathroom, and should be labeled. She stated that being on the floor, not in a plastic bag, is not sanitary. She stated that she does not check the bedpan every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address the use of bed rails for Resident #67. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #67s diagnoses included but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease (progressive loss of mental ability and function often accompanied by personality changes) (1), fracture of left femur (break in left thighbone) (2) and degeneration of discs (physical decline that involves tissue and cellular changes of the cushioning tissue between the vertebrae) (3). Resident #67's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 7/25/21, coded the resident as scoring 99 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview. MDS Section G- Functional Status: coded the resident, as extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, personal hygiene and bathing; walking and locomotion did not occur. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for four of 37 residents in the survey sample, Residents #31, #25, #37 and #21. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to review and revise Resident #31's comprehensive care plan for the use of bed rails. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #31's diagnoses included but were not limited to stroke, chronic kidney disease and anxiety disorder. Resident #31's quarterly minimum data set assessment with an assessment reference date of 6/23/21, coded the resident's cognition as severely impaired. Review of Resident #31's clinical record revealed a bed rail assessment dated [DATE] that documented the resident had not shown any clinical need for side rails (bed rails) at that time. On 8/3/21 at 11:22 a.m. and 8/4/21 at 8:01 a.m., Resident #31 was observed in bed with bilateral U bar bed rails.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review it was determined facility staff failed to store food and failed to to maintain dietary equipment in a sanitary manner. The facility failed to dispose of tomatoes in the walk-in refrigerator with visible black spots and signs of spoilage and observation of the round blade on the kitchens electric food slicer revealed a rust-colored area on the surface and edging of the blade approximately one-quarter inch in size. The findings include: 1. On 8/3/2021 at approximately 11:15 a.m., an observation was conducted in the kitchen of the facility with OSM (other staff member) #2, the dietary manager. Observation of the kitchen's walk in refrigerator revealed a 25 pound cardboard box of tomatoes with a date of 7/26/21 hand-written on the lid. Upon removal of the lid from the box, four tomatoes were observed with visible signs of spoilage on them. Two tomatoes were observed with black colored spots on the surface of the outer skin and two tomatoes were observed with a white colored substance at the stem area of the tomato. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the accommodation of needs for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #29. The facility staff failed to place Resident #29's call bell within reach on 8/3/21 and 8/4/21. The findings include: Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (1) and bipolar disorder (2). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/22/21, Resident #29 was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions, having scored five out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). She was coded as having had a fall in the month prior to admission, and as having had no falls since admission to the facility. Observations conducted on the following dates and time: 8/3/21 at 12:47 p.m. and 4:00 p.m.; 8/4/21 at 9:53 a.m., revealed Resident #29 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the facility abuse policy to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the administrator/ abuse coordinator for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #31. Resident #31 reported an allegation of abuse to facility staff on 1/16/21. The facility staff failed to immediately report this allegation to the facility administrator, ASM #1. ASM #1 stated he did not report Resident #31's allegation of abuse to the SA (state agency) and other officials until 1/19/21, because he was not made aware of the allegation until that date. The findings include: The facility abuse policy documented, Facility staff must immediately report all such allegations to the Administrator/Abuse Coordinator. The Administrator/Abuse Coordinator will immediately begin an investigation and notify the applicable local and state agencies in accordance with the procedures in this policy. 6)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse was reported immediately but no later than two hours for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #31. Resident #31 reported an allegation of abuse on 1/16/21. The facility staff failed to report this allegation to the SA (state agency) until 1/19/21. The findings include: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #31's diagnoses included but were not limited to stroke, chronic kidney disease and anxiety disorder. Resident #31's quarterly minimum data set assessment with an assessment reference date of 6/23/21, coded the resident's cognition as severely impaired. A nurse's note dated 1/16/21 documented, resident refused medication stated this evening while other staff was around that she was beat up by this person that she named HR sec heard not close i to her name but also said that she was hiding from her husband all shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-05 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide all required documents to the receiving facility upon transfer for two of 37 residents in the survey sample, Residents #64 and #25. 1. The facility staff failed to evidence Resident #64's comprehensive care plan goals and other documents required to care for the resident were sent to the hospital when Resident #64 was transferred and discharged there on 7/23/21. 2. The facility staff failed to provide evidence Resident #25's comprehensive care plan goals were provided to receiving hospital staff when the resident was transferred to the hospital on 6/26/21. The findings include: 1. Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (1) and generalized weakness. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/22/21, Resident #64 was coded as being moderately impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-05 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the resident and or RR (resident representative), and ombudsman in writing of the resident's discharge to the hospital for three of 37 residents in the survey sample, Residents #69, #64, and #25. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to notify the resident and or the RR in writing when Resident #69 was transferred and discharged to the hospital on 7/16/21. Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including endocarditis (1), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) (2), and dementia (3). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/26/21, Resident #69 was coded as being moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. A review of Resident #69's clinical record revealed the following progress note dated 7/16/21: Contacted [name of local hospital] to f/u…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #21. The facility staff failed to complete assessments for sections B0700, B0800 and section C of Resident #21's quarterly MDS with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/12/21. The findings include: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #21's diagnoses included but were not limited to high blood pressure, chronic respiratory failure and pain. Review of Resident #21's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 6/12/21 revealed sections B0700 and B0800 (assessments of whether the resident can make self-understood and whether the resident can understand others) were not completed. Also, section C (a cognition assessment) was not completed with the resident or with staff. On 8/5/21 at 7:53 a.m., an interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #4 (the MDS coordinator and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for two of 37 residents in the survey sample, (Residents #59 and #69). For Resident #59, the facility staff failed to develop a base line care plan for the use of side rails. For Resident #69, the facility staff failed to develop a care plan for the use of side rails. The findings include: 1. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of a heart attack and heart failure. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/19/21, Resident #59 was coded as being moderately impaired for making daily decisions, having scored nine out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). She was coded as requiring the assistance of two staff members for bed mobility. On the following dates and times: 8/3/21 at 12:22 p.m. and 3:48 p.m.; 8/4/21 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, family interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services to promote a resident's quality of life for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #59. The facility staff failed to get Resident #59 out of bed into a chair from her admission on [DATE] through 8/3/21. The findings include: Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of a heart attack and heart failure. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/19/21, Resident #59 was coded as being moderately impaired for making daily decisions, having scored nine out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). She was coded as requiring the assistance of two staff members for bed mobility. She was coded as not having transferred from her bed to any other surface during the look back period. She was coded as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent a resident's injury from a fall for one of 37 residents in the survey staff, Resident #29. The facility staff failed to place Resident #29's call bell within reach and to place fall mats beside the resident's bed on 8/3/21 and 8/4/21. The findings include: Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (1) and bipolar disorder (2). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/22/21, Resident #29 was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions, having scored five out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). She was coded as having had a fall in the month prior to admission, and as having had no falls since admission to the facility. Observations conducted on the following dates and time:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility staff failed to provide respiratory care, consistent with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered plan of care for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #17. The facility staff failed to replace Resident #17's nebulizer tubing (1) as ordered by the physician. The findings include: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (2) and atrial fibrillation (3). Resident #17's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/8/2021, coded Resident #17 as scoring a 12 on the staff assessment for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 12- being moderately impaired for making daily decisions. Section G coded Resident #6 as requiring extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers and toilet use. On 8/3/2021 at approximately 1:20 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #17 in bed in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-05 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The facility staff failed to evidence Resident #67 was assessed for risk of entrapment, failed to review risks / benefits and failed to obtain informed consent prior to the use of bed rails. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #67's diagnoses included but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease (progressive loss of mental ability and function often accompanied by personality changes) (1), fracture of left femur (break in left thighbone) (2) and degeneration of discs (physical decline that involves tissue and cellular changes of the cushioning tissue between the vertebrae) (3). Resident #67's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 7/25/21, coded the resident as scoring 99 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview. MDS Section G- Functional Status: coded the resident, as extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record reviews and facility document reviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure one of 37 residents in the survey sample was free of unnecessary medications, Resident #58. The facility staff failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of as needed pain medication for Resident #58. The findings include: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to encephalopathy (1) and cirrhosis of the liver (2). Resident #58's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/18/2021, coded Resident #58 as scoring a 13 on the staff assessment for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 13- being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section J coded Resident #58 as receiving scheduled and as needed pain medications. Section J further coded Resident #58 as not receiving non-medication interventions for pain and having pain almost constantly. On 8/3/2021 at approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a resident did not receive an unnecessary psychotropic medication for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #59. The facility staff failed to document adequate indications for the use of the anti-anxiety medication Alprazolam, failed to offer non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of the medication to Resident #59 and failed to monitor Resident #59 for side effects of the Alprazolam(1). The findings include: Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of a heart attack and heart failure. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/19/21, Resident #59 was coded as being moderately impaired for making daily decisions, having scored nine out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). She was coded as not having…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-01-19 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to post daily nurse staffing information prior to the start of the shift for one of three days observed. The findings include: The facility staff failed to post nurse staffing information on 1/18/2023 prior to the beginning of the nursing staff work shift. On 1/18/2023 at 8:03 a.m., and 8:29 a.m., observations of the posted nurse staffing information in the entrance hallway revealed staffing information dated 1/17/2023. On 1/18/2023 at 11:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #2, staffing coordinator. OSM #2 stated that the nursing schedules were 7:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m., 3:00 p.m.-11:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. OSM #2 stated that they worked Monday through Friday beginning at 8:00 a.m. OSM #2 stated that when they came in each day they reviewed the census in the facility, looked at the schedule for the day and filled out the daily staff posting and placed it in the hallway. OSM #2 stated that they did not post it prior to the beginning of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Bryn Mawr Extended Care CenterBryn Mawr, PA 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, PA 1 of 5Gastonia Health & Rehab CenterGastonia, NC 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab CenterJohnstown, PA 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazleton, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5University Manor Health & RehaCleveland, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Health & Rehab CenterMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MadisonMadison, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MechanicsvilleMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/28/2026
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
HOLMES, ANDREAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2025
HOPKINS, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2023
BUNDLE TENANT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/28/2026
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2010
MS CHESTERFIELD LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2015
SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2010
TCF NATIONAL BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/19/2019
WALKER & ASSOCIATES PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2010
MUGHAL, AMJADIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2010

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 8%Medicare 14%Other / private 77%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$338per resident / day
operating cost
$10,262per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$367per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495401. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next