No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Clarksville Health & Rehab Center

184 Buffalo Road, Clarksville, VA 23927 · For profit - Corporation · 168 certified beds · (434) 374-4141 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (434) 374-4141 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0610) — most recent Jun 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$22,874 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $22,874 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-19)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
115 College St · (434) 374-5344 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
24 Gateway Ln · (434) 374-8728 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion0.4 mi
1013 Virginia Ave · (434) 374-9530 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Buffalo Road · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.5%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.1%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.4%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.0%1.6%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms20.3%18.7%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.5%3.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.4%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.7%20.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.1%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.4%21.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.9%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.6%73.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.3%22.3%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.6%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.421.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.631.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 201 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 102 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.0%CMS range 51.7–64.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 8.3–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge77.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.6–9.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
23.1%
Total nursing turnover
23.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 168 beds and averages 143.6 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2022-11-30)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2021-04-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services to ensure residents received care to prevent development of pressure ulcer(s) for one resident (Resident # 3- R3) in a survey sample of 5 residents, resulting in harm for R3. Findings included: For R3, the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of and failed to identify and treat a pressure injury until at an advanced stage of wound deterioration, requiring sharps debridement (cutting the dead tissue out), which constituted harm. Review of the clinical record was conducted on 6/17/2024 -6/18/2024 and 6/20/2024. R3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: Cerebral infarction, difficulty in walking, muscle wasting and atrophy, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, hyperlipidemia, and essential (primary) hypertension. R3 was discharged from the facility on 4/29/24. R3's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-06-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, clinical record and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide pain management, resulting in numerous instances of untreated pain, which constituted harm for one resident (Resident #2 - R2), in a survey sample of five residents. The findings included: For R2, who had a right hip fracture of unknown origin, the facility staff failed to respond to and treat the resident's documented complaints of unrelieved pain on 12 occasions, which adversely affected her level of physical functioning in therapy and constituted harm. Resident #2 (R2) was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for R2 included, but were not limited: to cerebral infarction unspecified, muscle weakness and unspecified fracture of the lower end of left radius. R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 4/14/23 coded R2 with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status score) of 7, which indicated severely impaired cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for five of thirty-six residents in the survey sample (Residents #5, #6, #12, #14 and #152). The findings include: 1. Resident #5's clinical record documented a tracheostomy inner cannula was changed once every three months when the resident did not have/use an inner cannula. Resident #5 (R5) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease, history of vocal cord paralysis with tracheostomy, diabetes, hypertension, anemia, atrial fibrillation, depression, anxiety, schizophrenia and bradycardia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R5 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. R5's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 3/6/25 for tracheostomy care with instructions to change the inner cannula once every three months. R5's treatment administration record documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the staff failed to uphold the residents right to receive services with reasonable accommodation of individual needs for one resident, Resident #76 (76) out of a survey sample of 36 residents. The findings included:The facility staff failed to respond to resident call lights in a timely manner and turned off call lights before care or assistance was provided. On 6/9/26 at 1:00 pm, an observation was conducted. R76 had activated her call light requesting assistance for incontinence care. A certified nursing assistant entered the room to pick up R76's lunch tray and asked the resident what assistance was needed, and informed the resident she would return to assist her. Shortly after that a registered nurse, RN1 entered the room and turned off the call light without determining the resident's needs or ensuring the requested assistance had been provided. On 6/9/26 at 1:45 pm, an interview was conducted with R76. During the interview, R76 said. I have not received any care yet and I am wet and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documenation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a homelike environment on two of six units (Sundrop and [NAME] Lane units). The findings included: For the Sundrop and [NAME] Lane units, the facility staff failed to maintain comfortable water temperatures and provide consistent hot water for residents. On 6/10/26 at 8:37 AM, during observations of Resident #145's (R145) room, it was noted that the water in the bathroom never reached a temperature above lukewarm despite the water running for about five minutes. On 6/10/26 at 9:16 AM, an interview was conducted with licensed practical nurse #5 (LPN #5), who worked on the Sundrop unit. When asked about the water temperature, LPN #5 confirmed she was aware there was a problem a while back and someone had to come in and fix it. On 6/10/26 at 9:20 AM, the water in Resident #18's (R18) room was checked. It was noted that the water never reached a comfortable temperature and was barely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an enviornment free of accident hazards regarding water temperatures on two of six units (Sundrop and [NAME] Lane). The findings included:The facility failed to maintain water temperatures at a safe level to prevent the risk of scalding on two units. On 6/10/26 at 8:37 AM, during observations several resident rooms were noted to have water temperatures that were too hot for you to hold your hand under. On 6/10/26 at 9:16 AM, an interview was conducted with licensed practical nurse #5 (LPN #5), who worked on the Sundrop unit. When asked about the water temperature, LPN #5 confirmed she was aware there was a problem a while back and someone had to come in and fix it. On 6/10/26 at 1:30 PM, during the resident council group interview, multiple residents expressed concern that the water never gets hot and other times it gets hot just like that. On 6/10/26 at 4:17 PM, a tour of the facility was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility failed to ensure appropriate monitoring and assessment of a change in condition related to a urinary catheter for one resident, Resident #156 (R156) out of a survey sample of 36 residents. The findings included:The facility failed to monitor R156's urinary catheter when hematuria (blood in urine) was observed and failed to notify the medical provider of the change in condition. On 6/11/2026 at 9:43 AM, an interview was conducted with a registered nurse, RN1. She stated that if she was to observe blood in a residents urine she would notify the doctor unless it was something the doctor was already aware of or if it was expected example kidney stones. RN1 stated if the blood in the urine was a new finding then the doctor should be notified. She also stated if the progress note stated to monitor then, I would expect a follow up note after the note that said to continue to monitor. On 6/11/26 at 9:22 AM, an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide care to residents within the professional standards of practice and within the scope of practice of staff providing care for residents on 3 of 6 nursing units. The findings included: For residents on 3 of the 6 nursing units, the facility staff permitted nursing assistants to apply a zinc topical cream to residents, which was outside of their scope of practice and without a physician order. On 6/17/24-6/18/24, during the clinical record review of the residents sampled (Resident #1-Resident #5), it was not noted that any of the residents had physician orders for the application of barrier cream. On 6/20/24 at 9:44 a.m., an interview was conducted with LPN #4 (licensed practical nurse), who was a unit manager. When asked about the admission process of a resident, LPN #4 explained that when a resident is admitted assessments are conducted to identify resident's risks for skin breakdown by doing a Braden assessment, along with other assessments. When asked to describe the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, clinical record, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide a complete and accurate investigation for an injury of unknown origin that affected one resident, (Resident #2, R2) in a sample of five residents. The findings included: The facility staff failed to provide evidence of a thorough investigation to include staff and resident interviews conducted during their investigation and the correct information concerning the resident's pain that was in the clinical record during their investigation period. Resident #2 (R2) was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for R2 included but are not limited to cerebral infarction unspecified, muscle weakness and unspecified fracture of the lower end of left radius. R2's a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 3/13/24 coded R2 with severely impaired cognition. On 6/17124 a review of facility documentation was conducted.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to complete a comprehensive assessment timely for 1 resident (Resident #3- R3), in a survey sample of 5 residents. The findings included: For R3, the facility staff failed to conduct a comprehensive admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment timely. On 6/17/24 and 6/18/24, a clinical record review was conducted of R3's chart. This review on the census tab and in the progress, notes indicated that R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the assessments under the MDS tab of the EHR (electronic health record) revealed that R3's admission assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/14/24, was not completed and signed in section Z0500 until 5/6/24, by RN #1 (registered nurse). On 6/18/24 at 10:25 a.m., an interview was conducted with RN #1 and RN #2, both of whom were MDS nurses. RN #1 explained that admission MDS assessments are to be completed by day 14 of the resident's stay and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for one Resident (Resident #3- R3) in a survey sample of 5 Residents. The findings included: For R3, the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan timely and failed to include instructions needed to direct/provide patient centered care of the resident. On 6/17/24 and 6/18/24, a clinical record review was conducted of R3's chart. This revealed that R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The baseline care plan was developed on 4/11/24, which was outside of the 48 hours following admission as required. According to this 4/11/24 base line care plan, the problem area read, Baseline Care Plan: Resident admitted to facility for (skilled, LTC [long term]) care. This is the Baseline Care Plan identifying initial care needs, risks, strengths, and goals. The goal was stated as, Initial goal is to (discharge to community, remain in LTC, or other).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record review for 2 residents (Resident #2 - R2 and Resident #3 - R3), in a survey sample of 5 residents. The findings included: 1. For R2, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete clinical record by not having an x-ray result in the chart. On 6/17/24-6/18/24, and 6/20/24 a clinical record review was conducted of R2's chart. According to the physician progress notes, on 4/27/23 the nurse practitioner (NP) saw the R2 for trouble with right foot back under wheelchair when husband was pushing her along the hall and the NP assisted them back to room. No new orders were put in place. According to another progress note from the NP on 5/24/23, the NP saw R2 due to physical therapy had not been able to do therapy due to complained of right hip pain. The NP ordered an x-ray of the right hip. The results of the x-ray were not in R2's chart. Review of the facility's investigation file, a copy of the x-ray was noted, and the results showed a right femoral neck…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice for 3 Residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) in a survey sample of 8 Residents. For Resident #1, #2, and #3, the facility staff failed to administer medications in accordance with physician orders and failed to notify the physician that the ordered medications were not administered. The findings included: On 11/27/23 and 11/28/23, clinical record reviews were performed. This review revealed the following: 1. For Resident #1, the facility staff documented on 11/27/2023 at 6:21 PM, Medication Administration Note: Ativan Oral Tablet 0.5 MG, give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours related to anxiety disorder unspecified, not available from pharmacy. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the Ativan was not administered on 11/27/23. There was no indication that the physician was made aware of the missed dose. 2. Resident #2 had the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide adequate devices and interventions to maintain a safe environment to prevent accidents, affecting two Residents (Resident #1 and #4) in a survey sample of 8 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #4, the facility staff failed to ensure Dycem (a non-slip device) was in place, which was used as a fall intervention to reduce the risk of a repeat fall. On 11/27/23 at 2:05 PM, Resident #4 was observed being assisted to the bathroom by CNA B. CNA B was asked that once Resident #4 was in a standing position that the Surveyor be permitted to look at her wheelchair. There was a cushion in the wheelchair, CNA B lifted the cushion and confirmed that dycem was not in the wheelchair. On 11/27/23, a clinical record review revealed that Resident #4 had a care plan focus area that identified the resident as being at risk for falls. Interventions included, but were not limited to, Dycem in wheelchair by md orders. 2. For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to ensure that fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a GDR (gradual dose reduction) for one 22 residents in the survey sample, Resident #59. Findings include: Resident #59's diagnoses included but were not limited to: high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, Vitamin D deficiency, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. The resident's most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly review dated 08/28/22. The resident was assessed with a cognitive score of 15, indicating the resident was intact for daily decision making skills. The resident was assessed as requiring extensive to full assistance most all ADL's (activities of daily living). On 11/30/22 at 8:00 AM, Resident #59's clinical records were reviewed. A pharmacy recommendation dated 03/21/22 documented, .(Name of Resident #59) received buspirone (Buspar) 10 mg (milligrams) TID (three times daily) for GAD (generalized anxiety disorder) .Please attempt a gradual dose reduction [GDR] with the end goal of discontinuation . The resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of 22 resident's in the survey sample. The Findings Include: Resident #66 did not have a care plan for bowel and bladder incontinence. Diagnoses for Resident #66 included; Dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bowel and bladder incontinence. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/12/2022. Resident #66 was assessed with a cognitive score of 12 indicating cognitively intact. Section G (Activities of Daily Living) of the current MDS documented Resident #66 needs extensive assistance with one person physical assist for toilet use. Section F (Bladder and Bowel) of the MDS documented Resident #66 is frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel. On 11/30/22 at 8:13 AM Resident #66 was interviewed regarding incontinence and verbalized that she sometimes knows when she has to use the bathroom but a lot of times she has soiled herself and the aides will clean her up. Resident #66 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure an initial assessment was completed at the time of admission for one of 22 residents, Resident #98. Findings were: Resident #98 was system selected and added to the survey sample as a closed record due to her death in facility. She was admitted to the facility with end stage renal disease, type II diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. No MDS (minimum data set) was completed. The clinical record was reviewed on [DATE] at approximately 3:00 p.m. Documentation in the clinical record was limited. There were two progress notes observed and contained the following: [DATE] 07:27 (a.m.) 0525 (5:25 a.m.) Resident found with no respirations and cold to touch, 0535 (a.m.) RN (registered nurse) in facility pronounced death, 0545 (a.m.) .Hospice notified of death. DON (director of nursing) notified of death. 0555 (a.m.) RP (responsible party) notified of death and requested services of (Name…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to label opened insulin pens on one of four nursing units. Two insulin pens stored in a medication cart on [NAME] unit were not marked with the date opened to ensure proper storage. The findings include: On 11/28/22 at 1:25 p.m., accompanied by registered nurse unit manager (RN #1), a medication cart was inspected on [NAME] unit. Stored in the cart were two insulin pens. The pens (Novolog flexpen 100 units/milliliter; Lantus Solostar insulin pen 100 units/milliliter) labeled for a current resident were opened and had no date opened or discard date written on the pen. On 11/28/22 at 1:26 p.m., RN #1 was interviewed about the insulin pens with no date opened. RN #1 stated insulin pens were supposed to be labeled when opened for storage on the cart and discarded according to retention recommendations. RN #1 stated she was unable to know how long the pens had been opened since the date was not marked on the pen. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for one of 20 residents in the survey sample. Nurses documented duplicate administration of the controlled medication lorazepam to Resident #38 for 27 consecutive days and failed to correct duplicate physician orders and entries on the resident's medication administration record (MAR). The findings include: Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident (stroke), urinary tract infection, anemia, hypertension, anxiety and depression. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #38 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. Resident #38's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 3/3/21 for the controlled medication lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) two tablets to be administered at bedtime for treatment of anxiety. The physician orders included a duplicate order for lorazepam 0.5 mg two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for two of 20 residents in the survey sample. Resident #38 was administered an incorrect dose of the controlled medication Ativan (lorazepam). Fluid intake for Resident #22 was not monitored as ordered by the physician. The findings include: 1. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident (stroke), urinary tract infection, anemia, hypertension, anxiety and depression. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #38 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. Resident #38's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 3/3/21 for lorazepam (Ativan) 0.5 milligrams (mg) two tablets to be administered at each bedtime for treatment of anxiety. Review of Resident #38's medication administration record and the controlled medication count sheet for lorazepam documented a discrepancy in the dosage given on 3/28/21. Resident #38's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee record review, staff interview andfacility document review, the facility staff failed to implement policies andprocedures for abuse prevention for 3 of 25 staff. One personnel file did not contain a sworn statement and two personnel files did not contain a sworn statementor criminal background check. Findings include: A review of 25 personnel files was conducted on 04/01/21 at approximately 8:00 AM. A file of one employee (a Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN]), did not include a sworn statement and the files of three employees (two LPNs and an RN [Registered Nurse]) did not include sworn statements or a criminal background check conducted by the Virginia State Police. On 04/01/21 at approximately 8:40 AM, the administrator stated that she did not think that these employees needed these documents, as they were considered vendors. The administrator was asked for a policy on screening new employees. A policy titled, Employee background screening documented, .background and licensure checks on all new employees and volunteers .all applicants and new employees must certify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for two of 20 residents in the survey sample. Resident #38's care plan was not updated regarding interventions for contractures. Resident #427's plan of care was not updated to include care of oxygen administration equipment. The findings include: 1. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident (stroke), urinary tract infection, anemia, hypertension, anxiety and depression. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #38 with moderately impaired cognitive skills and impaired range of motion of the left upper and lower extremities. On 3/30/21 at 11:23 a.m., Resident #38 was observed in bed. The resident's left wrist and fingers on the resident's left hand were contracted. The resident held her left arm/hand close to her chest with the fingers on her left hand touching her palm.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement interventions to address hand/wrist contractures for one of 20 residents in the survey sample. Resident #38, with contractures in her left hand/wrist had no interventions in place to prevent a further decrease in range of motion. The findings include: Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident (stroke), urinary tract infection, anemia, hypertension, anxiety and depression. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #38 with moderately impaired cognitive skills and impaired range of motion of the left upper and lower extremities. On 3/30/21 at 11:23 a.m., Resident #38 was observed in bed. The resident's left wrist and fingers on the resident's left hand were contracted. The resident held her left arm/hand close to her chest with the fingers on her left hand touching her palm. There were no positioning and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a medication pass and pour observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. The facility had 31 medication opportunities with two medication errors, which resulted in a medication error rate of 6.45%. Findings include: On 03/31/21 at approximately 7:50 AM, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) #3 prepared medications for Resident #47. LPN #3 removed Resident #47's medication cards from the cart and prepared to dispense the medication pills into a cup. LPN #3 dispensed six medications and one, half tablet into the cup. The half tablet was identified from the medication card, which documented: .CITALOPRAM .20MG TABLET Give 1.5 tablet [30 mg] by mouth one time a day for depression. This card only had half tablets, which were 10 mg each. LPN #3 administered the medications to the resident. Resident #47 only received one half tablet, which was 10 mg and not 30 mg of citalopram as ordered by the physician. Resident # 47's physician's orders documented, .Citalopram .20 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with professional standards of practices in one of three medication storage rooms, and on one of five medications carts. Findings include: On 03/31/21 at 9:39 AM, the medication room on the 100/200 unit was observed with RN (Registered Nurse) #1 (nursing supervisor). The narcotic lock box inside the refrigerator was unlocked by RN #1 for observation. The RN removed two small plastic bags, each bag contained two, unopened 1 ml (milliliter) vials of Lorazepam [2mg/ml]. One of the bags belonged to Resident #7 (a current resident of the facility). The medication bag was labeled with the resident's name and dated 2020. The other bag containing the other two vials of Lorazepam had a resident name, which was not found in the facility's electronic record [identified as Resident #00]. This medication had the resident's name and dated 2019. RN #1 stated that she did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-01 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure physician ordered laboratory services were obtained for one of 20 residents, Resident #278. The Finding Include: Resident #278 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #278 included: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cirrhosis of liver, protein calorie malnutrition, alcohol dependence with withdrawal. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a 5 day assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/29/21. Resident #278 was assessed with a cognitive score of 14 indicating cognitively intact. On 3/30/21 Resident #278's medical record was reviewed. A physician's order dated 3/25/21 documented CBC [complete blood count], CMP [chemical metabolic panel], Mag [magnesium], phos [phosphorus], pre-Albumin in a.m. Lab results for Resident #278 were not found in the clinical record. On 03/31/21 at 8:10 AM, medical records staff (Other staff OS #1) was interviewed. OS #1 said when labs test are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility failed to ensure a complete and accesible medical record for one of 20 residents in the survey sample, Resident #47. The care plan for Resident #47 was not in the electronic medical record, and was not available/accesible to direct care staff on the unit where the resident resided. The Findings Include: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #47 included; Guillain-Barre syndrome, chronic kidney disease, and neurogenic bladder. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/5/21. Resident #47 was assessed with a cognitive score of 15 indicating cognitively intact. On 03/30/21 at 02:08 Resident #47 was interviewed. Resident #47's Foley catheter was observed during the interview and Resident #47 was asked how often the catheter was changed. Resident #47 was unsure how often the catheter was changed. On 03/30/21 Resident #47's current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-01-31 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, group interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure appealing, alternate food options of similar nutritive value were available for residents. The facility staff failed to provide appealing, alternate food options of similar nutritive value to residents who do not eat food that was initially served or had requested a different meal choice, and failed to ensure that the alternate food options were clearly communicated and/or documented for resident knowledge of optimum alternate food choices. Findings include: An initial tour and observation of the kitchen was conducted on 01/29/19 at 11:15 AM. During the initial observation food temperatures were completed on the lunch menu items. The DM (dietary manger) was asked what the alternate food items for today were available for residents. The DM stated that they (the facility) did not have alternate food items. The DM was asked if a resident doesn't like what is being served, what alternate food choices do they have. The DM stated that the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a water management program to identify the risk of Legionella, and also failed to perform hand hygiene during meal service. 1. The facility staff failed to develop and implement a water management program to identify the risk of Legionella. 2. A nurse failed to perform hand hygiene between residents during a meal observation on the Honeysuckle unit. Findings include: 1. On 1/29/19 at 1:30 p.m. the facility administrator was asked for the Legionella identification program. The administrator stated she would get with staff responsible and bring to the conference room. On 1/30/19 at 2:30 p.m. the non-clinical services director, other staff (OS) # 2, came to the conference room to ask what was needed. OS # 2 was told the Legionella water management protocol was needed for review. OS # 2 stated I think that's in the Emergency Preparedness book. OS # 2 then left the room and returned a few minutes later stating You're correct; what's in the Emergency book isn't for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to develop a CCP (comprehensive care plan) for the care and services for three of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #115, #106 and #101. 1. The facility staff failed to develop a CCP for Resident #115's AV (arteriovenous) graft (hemodialysis) access site for the provision of care and assessment with interventions. 2. Resident #106 did not have a care plan to address antipsychotic medications. 3. Resident #101 had no care plan developed regarding a leaking ileostomy and a skin rash/excoriation from contact with the leaking liquid stool. Findings include: 1. Resident #115 was admitted to the facility originally on 06/14/18. Diagnoses for Resident #115 included, but were not limited to: history of chronic alcohol use, DM (diabetes mellitus) requiring insulin, HTN (high blood pressure), seizure disorder, acquired absence of right below the knee amputation, and end…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-01-31 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — pattern
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to assess and implement interventions for care of an ileostomy for one of 28 residents in the survey sample. Resident #101 was observed with a leaking ileostomy bag and red, excoriated skin in the area of the leaking stool. The facility failed to assess and implement interventions for the excoriated skin related to the leaking ileostomy. The facility staff failed to initiate and/or implement interventions to prevent stool leakage from the ileostomy that direct care staff stated had been ongoing for at least three months. The findings include: Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #101 included chronic atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, anemia, ileostomy due to diverticulosis, history of gastrointestinal bleed, neurogenic bladder and dementia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-01-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure care and services of a hemodialysis catheter access site was provided for one of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #115. The facility staff failed to assess Resident #115's AV graft (hemodialysis) access site for the provision of care, assessment and care planning. The facility staff were not assessing the resident's AV (arteriovenous) graft on a daily basis to ensure proper blood flow and/or assess for any changes or potential complications related to a hemodialysis access site. Findings include: Resident #115 was admitted to the facility originally on 06/14/18. Diagnoses for Resident #115 included, but were not limited to: history of chronic alcohol use, DM (diabetes mellitus) requiring insulin, HTN (high blood pressure), seizure disorder, acquired absence of right below the knee amputation, and end stage renal failure (dependent on renal/hemodialysis). The most recent MDS (minimum data base),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-01-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, group interview, facility document review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to respond to call bells in a timely manner. During interviews, multiple residents stated they waited at times from 30 minutes to one hour for staff response to call bells. The findings include: On 1/29/19 at 11:40 a.m., Resident #81 was interviewed about quality of care/life in the facility. When asked about staff response to call bells, Resident #81 stated he frequently waited 30 minutes for call bell response, especially when he was in the bathroom. Resident #81 stated he was able to get into the bathroom independently but required assistance for getting clothing back on after using the bathroom. Resident #81 stated he frequently waited 30 minutes or more for assistance from the bathroom, depending on which aides were working. Resident #81 stated he had talked with nursing about the slow response but had not seen the times improve. On 1/30/19 at 10:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with a group of seven cognitively intact residents regarding quality of care/life…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a dignified dining experience on one of five living units. Without seeking the resident's permission, a nurse administered an injection to a resident in front of others during the lunch meal on the Honeysuckle unit. In addition, a nurse stood beside two residents while feeding them their lunch. The findings include: A meal observation was conducted on the Honeysuckle unit on 1/29/19 from 11:45 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. On 1/29/19 at 11:53 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN) #6 was observed giving a male resident an injection in his right upper arm. The resident was seated at a table near the kitchenette with two other residents at the same table and multiple other residents and staff in the dining area. LPN #6 pulled back the resident's shirtsleeve then administered the injection with no prior permission from the resident. On 1/29/19 at 12:11 p.m., LPN #6 was observed feeding several bites of food to a resident while standing beside her. LPN #6 then went to the right side of another resident at the same table…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for treatment and care of skin integrity for one of 28, Resident #91. Resident #91 did not have physician ordered heel protectors on while in bed. The Findings Include: Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Muscle contractures, osteoarthritis, lower extermety edema, and stage 3 pressure ulcer to sacral area. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a significant change assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/26/18. Resident #91 was assessed with a cognitive score of 15, indicating cognitively intact. On 01/29/19 at 2:36 PM, Resident #91 was interviewed. Resident #91 was laying in bed; a pair of Prevlon boots (used to protect heels) were observed in a chair beside the bed. Resident #91 was asked if there were any open wound areas. Resident #91 verbalized that he had an open area to his bottom. After completing an interview with Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to anchor the tubing for a Foley urinary catheter for one of 28 residents in the survey sample. Resident #101 did not have the Foley catheter tubing anchored to her thigh as ordered by the physician and required in her plan of care. The findings include: Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #101 included chronic atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, anemia, ileostomy due to diverticulosis, history of gastrointestinal bleed, neurogenic bladder and dementia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #101 with severely impaired cognitive skills and as totally dependent on one person for hygiene, bathing and toileting. On 1/30/19 at 9:25 a.m., accompanied by licensed practical nurse (LPN #5), Resident #101's Foley catheter tubing was observed. The urinary catheter tubing was not anchored in any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, facility staff failed to provide a diet per physician order for one of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #2. Facility staff failed to provide finger foods per physician order for Resident #2 at each meal. Findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to: Dementia with psychosis, Alzheimer's Disease, Macular Degeneration, Insomnia, and Anxiety. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/11/19. Resident #2 was assessed as impaired in her short and long term memory and moderately impaired in her daily decision making skills. Resident #2 was observed on 01/29/19 at approximately 12:00 p.m. with lunch that consisted of lasagna, broccoli and green beans. She was observed on 01/30/19 at 8:35 a.m. with breakfast that consisted of cereal with bananas, egg omelet, ham, toast and pudding. Resident #2's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure expired biological's were not readily available for use on one of 5 units. Expired lab collection tubes were readily available for use on the Primrose unit. The Findings Include: On [DATE] at 10:15 AM, storage of medications and biological's were observed on the Primrose unit. Three lab collection tubes were observed by this surveyor and license practical nurse (LPN #1) to be expired and mixed in with lab tubes that were not expired. Two of the lab tubes had an expiration date of [DATE] and one lab collection tube had an expiration date of [DATE]. LPN #1 was interviewed concerning the finding. LPN #1 verbalized that all nurses should be checking for expiration dates and discarding any lab tubes that are expired so the tubes couldn't be used. On [DATE] at 4:22 PM, the above information was brought to the attention of the director of nursing (DON) and administrator during an end of day staff meeting. The DON and administrator were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$22,874 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $22,874 — penalty dated 2024-06-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Care of MarshvilleMarshville, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of Myrtle GroveWilmington, NC 1 of 5Autumn Care of WaynesvilleWaynesville, NC 1 of 5Brunswick Health & Rehab CenterAsh, NC 1 of 5Bryn Mawr Extended Care CenterBryn Mawr, PA 1 of 5Caring Heights Community Care & Rehab CtrCoraopolis, PA 1 of 5Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLCVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Currituck Health & Rehab CenterBarco, NC 1 of 5Davidson Health & Rehab CenterLexington, NC 1 of 5Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, PA 1 of 5Gastonia Health & Rehab CenterGastonia, NC 1 of 5Greene Health & Rehab CenterGreensburg, PA 1 of 5Grey Stone Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Wayne, IN 1 of 5Harmar Village Health & Rehab CenterCheswick, PA 1 of 5Highland Pointe Health & Rehab CenterHighland Heights, OH 1 of 5Hilltop Heights Health & Rehab CenterJohnstown, PA 1 of 5Maple Heights Health & Rehab Center, LLCEbensburg, PA 1 of 5Midtown Oaks Health & Rehab CenterAltoona, PA 1 of 5Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazleton, PA 1 of 5Providence Health & Rehab CenterBeaver Falls, PA 1 of 5River's Bend Health & Rehab CenterHarrisburg, PA 1 of 5Riverside Health & Rehab CenterMcKeesport, PA 1 of 5South Boston Health & Rehab CenterSouth Boston, VA 1 of 5Tallmadge Health & Rehab CenterTallmadge, OH 1 of 5University Manor Health & RehaCleveland, OH 1 of 5Village Care of KingKing, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Health & Rehab CenterMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Woodlands Health And Rehab CenterRavenna, OH 2 of 5Aurora Manor Special Care CentAurora, OH 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MadisonMadison, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of MechanicsvilleMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care Of SuffolkSuffolk, VA 2 of 5Autumn Care of CorneliusCornelius, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of RaefordRaeford, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda, NC 2 of 5Autumn Care of ShallotteShallotte, NC 2 of 5Azalea Health & Rehab CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Bath Manor Special Care CentreAkron, OH 2 of 5Berea Health & Rehab CenterFredericksburg, VA 2 of 5Broad Mountain Health And Rehabilitation CenterFrackville, PA

Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHOUGH HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST90%since 01/01/2026
OHI ASSET SABER OPCO JV, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 01/01/2026
OHI ASSET (VA) CLARKSVILLE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
VOLPE, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
WEISBERG, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
SHG MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2026
FARMER, ALEXISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/31/2024
HOPKINS, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2023
CITRIN COOPERMAN ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/02/2022
SABER GOVERNANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2026
SHG BOA LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/26/2026
SHG MT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/26/2026
WALKER & ASSOCIATES PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
MADHOUN, MAZENIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/20/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 5%Medicare 8%Other / private 87%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$252per resident / day
operating cost
$7,660per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$289per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495379. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2022-11-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next