Ridgecrest Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 104.9 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review it was determined the facility staff failed to prevent an accident hazard by ensuring that a bag of medications had been properly secured on 1 of 3 units in the facility. The scope and severity was originally cited at Immediate Jeopardy, Level IV Isolated and was reduced to a Level II Isolated after the facility was cleared of Immediate Jeopardy. The administrator and regional vice president of operations were notified on 7/16/19 that the extended survey process had begun at 9:02 am, as the survey team had identified Immediate Jeopardy & Substandard Quality of Care in the area of Quality of Care. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure that a bag of medications had been properly secured on a dementia unit within the facility. The opened bag of medications was left on the floor in the nurse's station that was open and accessible to the wandering residents on the Carter's Fold secured dementia unit, which created an accident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2019-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to appropriately store medications on 1 of 3 units and failed to label a medication for 1 of 34 residents, Resident # 20. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that a bag of medications had been properly stored on a dementia unit within the facility. The opened bag of medications was left on the floor in the nurse's station that was open and accessible to the wandering residents on the Carter's Fold secured dementia unit, which created the potential for a serious adverse outcome. The scope and severity was originally cited at Immediate Jeopardy, Level IV Isolated and was reduced to a Level II Isolated after the facility was cleared of Immediate Jeopardy. The administrator and regional vice president of operations were notified on 7/16/19 that the extended survey process had begun at 9:02 am, as the survey team had identified Immediate Jeopardy & Substandard Quality of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in a manner that would prevent foodborne illnesses. The sanitizing cycle of the dishwashing machine was not working. The findings included: The sanitizing cycle of the dishwashing machine in the facility kitchen was not working. The test strips did not detect any sanitizing solution. On 02/20/24 at approximately 11:00 a.m., during the initial observation of the facility kitchen Dietary Employee #1 attempted to check the sanitizing solution of the dishwashing machine. Dietary Employee #1 used three different test strips to check the sanitizing solution. None of these test strips changed color. The sanitizing solution bucket was observed to be approximately 2/3 full of solution and the surveyor observed the system that pulled the sanitizer solution into the machine turning. Dietary Employee #1 stated they would call maintenance and would wash dishes by hand. 02/20/24 at 12:15 p.m., the Maintenance Director stated they had checked the dishwashing machine, the sanitizer line in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan and provider orders for 2 of 21 residents in the survey sample, Residents #34 and #56. The findings included: 1. For Resident #34, the facility staff failed to administer Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate (an oral medication prescribed to treat rheumatoid arthritis) as ordered by the provider on six (6) separate occasions. Resident #34's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Essential Hypertension. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/06/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 14 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #34's comprehensive person-centered care plan included a focus area stating the resident was at risk for pain and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to assess a resident's ability to safely smoke for 1 of 21 residents, Resident #64. Facility staff failed to complete a smoking assessment for Resident #64 when resident began smoking after admission. The findings included: For Resident #64 the facility staff failed to complete a safe smoking assessment once the resident began smoking. During entrance conference, surveyor was provided with a list of residents that smoke. Resident #64's name was on this list. Resident #64's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to bipolar disorder, severe, with psychotic features, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and generalized anxiety disorder. Resident #64's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 12/12/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 3 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Resident #64's comprehensive care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care consistent with the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the provider orders for 1 of 21 residents in the survey sample, Resident #34. The findings included: For Resident #34, the facility staff failed to administer supplemental oxygen as ordered by the physician. Resident #34's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Essential Hypertension. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/06/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 14 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #34 was coded as receiving oxygen therapy. Resident #34's comprehensive person-centered care plan included a focus area stating in part .O 2 (oxygen) therapy as ordered with an intervention stating O2 as ordered. On 2/21/24 at 8:58 AM and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were two (2) medication errors in 29 opportunities for a medication error rate of 6.9%. These medication errors affected Resident #12 and/or Resident #57. The findings included: For Resident #12, the facility staff failed to administer Calcium-Vit D-Min Oral Tablet 600-400 mg-unit; this was documented on Resident #12 medication administration record (MAR) to be provided one time a day. On 2/21/24 at 8:18 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 was observed to provide Calcium 500 mg-Vitamin D 5 mcg. On 2/21/24 at 9:58 a.m., LPN #4 confirmed they had provided Resident #12 the Calcium 500 mg tablet. On 2/21/24 at 10:22 a.m., LPN #4 stated they did not have the Calcium 600/Vit D 400 tablet in the medication cart during Resident #12's aforementioned medication administration observation. For Resident #57, the facility staff failed to administer Senna S (sennosides 8.6 mg and docusate 50 mg) as ordered by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain complete and/or accurate clinical record for three (3) of 21 sampled residents (Resident #66, Resident #101, and Resident #154). The findings included: 1. Resident #101's clinical record failed to include documentation of the change in the resident's condition which resulted in an increase in the resident's pain medication dosage. Resident #101's clinical record failed to include documentation of the medical provider notification which had resulted in the medical provider increasing the resident's pain medication dosage. Resident #101's medication orders indicated: - On 11/24/23 at 7:53 p.m., the resident's pain medication Morphine was increased from 0.5 ml every four (4) hours as needed to 1.0 ml scheduled to be provided every four (4) hours. No documentation in Resident #101's clinical record provided information as to the change in the resident's condition which resulted in this change in the medication order. - On 11/25/23 at 10:46 a.m., the resident's pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow established infection control guidelines to decrease the potential of and/or risk for infection transmission for 1 of 21 current residents, Resident #96. The findings included: During a surgical wound care observation, the facility staff failed to complete hand hygiene and was observed to touch dressing supplies used to clean the wound with their bare hands. Resident #96's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fractures, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #96's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/04/24 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. Resident #96's comprehensive care plan included the focus areas, traumatic subluxation of peroneal tendon of left foot. Resident 96's clinical record included a provider order to change dressing to left lower extremity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide written bed hold policy information to the resident or resident representative prior to transfer for 1 of 4 closed record reviews, Resident #86. For Resident #86, the facility failed to provide the resident written bed hold policy information prior to transfer to an acute care hospital. The findings included: Resident #86's clinical record included the medical diagnoses, diabetes, dependence on respirator, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and tachycardia. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #86's significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 06/24/22 was coded 1/1/3 to indicate the resident had problems with long and short term memory and was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. The residents clinical record included an interact form dated 06/29/22 indicating the resident was transferred to a local hospital. On 07/11/22 the Social Worker,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview the facility staff failed to prepare, distribute and serve food in a manner that would prevent foodborne illnesses. The facility staff did not complete any hand hygiene prior to obtaining food temperatures. The findings included: The facility staff when obtaining food temperatures allowed the top of the thermometer to touch the food. The top of this thermometer is what the facility staff held while obtaining food temperatures. The facility staff did not have gloves in place, were not observed to wash their hands prior to obtaining the temperatures, and were observed touching the top of the thermometer with their bare hands. On 07/16/19 at 11:41 a.m., the surveyor entered the kitchen to obtain tray line temperatures. Tray aide #1 was working in the kitchen area and stated she would obtain the tray line temperatures. Tray aide #1 did not wash their hands or apply any gloves prior to obtaining these temperatures. Tray aide #1 picked up the thermometer with their bare hands and placed the thermometer into a pan of broccoli. Tray aide #1 did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an infection control program during a medication pass and pour observation and for 4 of 34 residents (Resident 21, Resident #91, Resident #79, and Resident #20). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene during a medication pass and pour observation on 7/16/19 with licensed practical nurse #2. The surveyor observed a medication pass and pour observation on 7/16/19 beginning at 8:12 a.m. with licensed practical nurse #2. L.P.N. #2 used hand sanitizer before entering the medication cart to begin the medication pass. L.P.N. #2 prepared seven medications for Resident #21 and administered the medications. L.P.N. #2 returned to the medication cart. No hand washing was observed upon exiting Resident #21's room or prior to entering the medication cart. L.P.N. #2 left the medication cart, went to the medication room for two medications for Resident #21, poured…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA