Falls Run Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 425 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 218 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 87.3 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for three of 37 residents in the survey sample, Residents #32, #31, and #6. The findings include: 1. For Resident #32 (R32), the facility staff failed to implement the care plan to attempt non-pharmacological interventions as part of the resident's pain management program. A review of R32's physician orders revealed the following order dated 1//17/23: Oxycodone-Acetaminophen (opioid pain medication) 5-325 mg (milligrams) .Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for moderate or severe pain. A review of R32's March 2023 MAR (medication administration record) revealed the resident received the Oxycodone-Acetaminophen as ordered on 3/2/23, 3/4/23, 3/6/23, 3/11/23, 3/12/23, and 3/14/23. Further review of the clinical record revealed no evidence that non-pharmacological interventions were offered to R32 prior to the administration of Oxycodone-Acetaminophen on all six of the dates in March 2023. A review of R32's care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement a complete pain management program for two of 37 residents in the survey sample, Residents #32 and #6. The findings include: 1. For Resident #32 (R32), the facility staff failed to offer non-pharmacological interventions and assess for the location of a resident's pain prior to administering an as needed pain medication on multiple occasions in March 2023. A review of R32's physician orders revealed the following order dated 1/17/23: Oxycodone-Acetaminophen (opioid pain medication) 5-325 mg (milligrams) .Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for moderate or severe pain. A review of R32's March 2023 MAR (medication administration record) revealed the resident received the Oxycodone-Acetaminophen as ordered on 3/2/23, 3/4/23, 3/6/23, 3/11/23, 3/12/23, and 3/14/23. Further review of the clinical record revealed no evidence that non-pharmacological interventions were offered to R32 prior to the administration of Oxycodone-Acetaminophen on all six of these dates…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free from an unnecessary medication for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #6. The findings include: For Resident #6 (R6), the facility staff administered the as needed pain medication, tramadol, outside of the physician's order for pain rated between six to ten on a scale of one to ten (one being least and ten being most) on multiple dates in January 2023 and February 2023. The staff administered tramadol for a pain rating less than six. A review of R6's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 11/23/20 for tramadol 50 mg (milligrams)- one tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed for pain rated six to ten. A review of R6's January 2023 and February 2023 MARs (medication administration records) revealed the resident was administered as needed tramadol for pain rated less than six on the following dates: 1/3/23 (pain rated as two) 2/4/23 (pain rated as four) 2/20/23 (pain rated as zero) 2/23/23 (pain rated as zero) 2/28/23 (pain rated as three) 2/28/23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to initiate a written grievance for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #6. The findings include: For Resident #6 (R6), the facility staff failed to initiate a written grievance when the resident reported a missing coat. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/2/23, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact. On 3/14/23 at 3:31 p.m., an interview was conducted with R6. The resident stated someone stole their winter coat in November 2022. R6 stated this was reported to multiple staff and the coat was supposed to be replaced but it had not yet been replaced. A review of R6's clinical record failed to reveal documentation regarding R6's missing coat. A review of the November 2022 and December 2022 grievances failed to reveal documentation regarding R6's missing coat. On 3/16/23 at 9:17 a.m., an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Residents #272. This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. The findings include: The facility staff failed to have effective interventions implemented to prevent Resident #272 from wandering into other resident rooms. Resident #272 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus, hypertension and adult failure to thrive. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/21/22, coded the resident as scoring a 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, which indicated the resident was not cognitively impaired. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring limited assistance for bed mobility, transfer, hygiene and bathing;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services for a urinary catheter for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #53. The findings include: For Resident #53 (R53), the facility staff failed to secure the resident's urinary catheter bag in a sanitary manner. A urinary catheter is a tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder. (1) A review of R53's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 2/12/23 for a urinary catheter. On 3/15/23 at 8:19 a.m., R53 was observed lying in bed. The resident's urinary catheter bag was secured to the bed frame under the bed and touching the floor. On 3/16/23 at 10:33 a.m., an interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #1. RN #1 stated that if a resident is lying in bed, then their urinary catheter bag should hang on a bar under the bed and should not touch the floor because someone could step on it and because of infection. On 3/16/23 at approximately 12:00 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1 (the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services per physician orders, for two of 37 residents in the survey sample, Residents #18 and #31. The findings include: 1. For Resident #18 (R18), the facility staff failed to administer oxygen at the physician prescribed rate of four liters per minute. A review of R18's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 1/22/23 for oxygen at four liters per minute via nasal cannula every shift. R18's comprehensive care plan revised on 1/24/23 documented, Oxygen as needed . On 3/14/23 at 12:40 p.m. and 3/15/23 at 2:31 p.m., R18 was observed lying in bed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at one and a half liters per minute, as evidenced by the middle of the ball in the oxygen concentrator flowmeter positioned on the one-and-a-half-liter line. On 3/16/23 at 10:33 a.m., an interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #1. RN #1 stated nurses should know how much oxygen to administer to a resident based on the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to properly store medications for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #59. The findings include: For Resident #59 (R59), the facility staff failed to secure a bottle of Vitamin D 10000 IU (international units) and one bottle of multivitamins in the resident room. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/21/2023, the resident scored 10 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. On 3/14/2023 at 1:46 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #59's (R59) room. R59 was not in the room at the time however their family member was in the room. R59's family member stated that the resident was in therapy. Observation of R59's room revealed two bottles of medication on top of the nightstand beside the bed. One bottle was labeled Vitamin D 10000 IU…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #26. The findings include: For Resident #26 (R26), the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate ADL (activities of daily living) documentation record for February 2023. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a five day admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/8/2023, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) indicating they were cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section G documented R26 required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility and limited assistance of one person for transfers, toileting and personal hygiene. The comprehensive care plan for R26 documented in part, At risk for self care deficit severe sepsis and amputation. Date Initiated: 02/05/2023. A review of the ADL documentation for R26 failed to evidence documentation of personal hygiene,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-26 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The facility staff failed to provide Resident # 14 and the resident's representative written notification of a facility-initiated transfer on 05/19/2021 and 06/22/2021 for Resident # 14. Resident # 14 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: rectal bleeding and diabetes. Resident # 14's most recent MDS [minimum data set], a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 05/30/2021, coded Resident # 14 as scoring a 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15 - being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The facility's Progress Note for Resident # 14 dated 05/19/2021 at 3:05 p.m., documented in part, Resident currently transferred to [Name of Hospital] for evaluation of possible GI [gastrointestinal (stomach and intestines)] bleed. The facility's Progress Note for Resident # 14 dated 06/22/2021 at 12:31 p.m., documented in part, Resident noted to have blood in her stool x 2 [times two] and has been loosing [Sic.]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA