Hampton Health & Rehab Center, LLC
2230 Executive Drive Revised, Hampton, VA 23666 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 86 certified beds · (757) 224-2230 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.6% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.8% | 18.7% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.5% | 15.6% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.0% | 20.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.0% | 94.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.4% | 21.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.3% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 34.2% | 73.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.8% | 22.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.5% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 230 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 101 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.9%CMS range 52.6–68.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 8.3–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 54.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 4.6–10.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 81.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2021-03-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a complaint investigation, observations, staff and resident interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide care and services to prevent pressure ulcers prior to identification at an advanced stage for 2 of 36 residents (R#13 and #408) in the survey sample which constituted harm for both residents. Resident #13's sacral pressure ulcer was first identified on 3/18/21 by senior nursing management as unstageable, as well as Resident #408's sacral pressure ulcer first identified on 3/7/20 at a Stage III. The findings included: 1. Resident #13 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and right lung cancer. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was dated 1/5/21 and coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 15 out of a possible score of 15 which indicated the resident was intact with the cognitive skills for daily decision making. The resident was coded to require limited assistance of one person for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that residents and/or resident representatives had the opportunity to develop an Advanced Directive for 12 of 22 residents, Residents #3, 5, 29, 47, 4, 16, 62, 2, 38, 42, 50, and 75 and failed to honor an Advance Directive for 1 of 22 Residents, Resident #23. The findings include: On [DATE], the facility administrative staff provided the survey team with a copy of a policy titled, ADVANCE DIRECTIVES PROTOCOL. This policy read in part, .Upon admission during Your Path Meetings, advance directives will be discussed with resident and/or resident representative to determine if any advance directives have be [sic] chosen .Advance directives will be reviewed at minimum annually according to MDS [minimum data set] schedule . 1. For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to provide the resident and/or the resident representative with information concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-05 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that written transfer notices were provided for 4 of 31 Residents, Residents #26, #129, #71, and #72. The findings included: 1. For resident # 26 the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative(s) of the transfer and the reasons in writing, and in a language and manner they understand. The facility staff also failed to send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman. Resident # 26's diagnoses included but were not limited to, history of cerebral infarction (stroke), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, depression, vitamin deficiency and depression. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/21/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the safe and secure storage of medications and biologicals for 2 of 4 medication carts (Unit 1/Cart 1 and Unit 2/Cart 1) and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (Unit 1). The findings included: 1. For Unit 1/Medication Cart 1, the facility staff left a Colestipol tablet (medication used to lower cholesterol) unattended on top of the medication cart. On [DATE] at 8:26 AM during a medication pass observation, surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 place a Colestipol tablet in a separate medication cup as it appeared damaged and obtained a replacement tablet for administration. LPN #1 left the cup containing the damaged tablet on top of the medication cart unattended and entered a resident's room. While in the resident's room, LPN #1 provided care and administered medications with the door closed leaving the Colestipol tablet unattended in the hall for approximately nine (9) minutes. When asked about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to honor the residents preference of eating meals in the dining room for 1 of 22 current residents, Resident #3. The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure the dining room was available for all three meals 7 days a week. Resident #3's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, mild protein calorie nutrition and diabetes. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #3's significant change in status minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/03/24 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. Per the MDS manual a score of 15=cognitively intact. Section GG (functional abilities and goals) was coded to indicate this resident used a wheelchair for mobility and was partial/moderate assist with eating. On 09/04/24 at 11:35 a.m., during an interview with Resident #3, this resident stated they liked to get out of their room and needed to move around. Resident #3 stated they went to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify the provider of a critical lab result for 1 of 9 closed records, Resident #129. The findings included: Resident # 129's diagnoses included but were not limited to history of cerebral infarction (stroke), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, depression, vitamin deficiency and depression. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/21/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. A review of resident # 129's medication administration record (MAR) revealed they were on aspirin 81 mg daily for CVA (stroke) prophylaxis and Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication used to treat and prevent blood clots and prevent stroke) 5 mg twice daily. Each of these medications are given to thin the blood and put the patient at risk of bleeding. There was an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage at least two days prior to the end of a Medicare covered Part A stay when benefit days were not exhausted for 1 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #45. The findings included: For Resident #45, the facility staff failed to provide Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage at least two days prior to the end of their Medicare covered Part A stay. Resident #45's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Sepsis, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/14/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #45's last covered day of Medicare Part A services was 4/03/24. A Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was issued and signed by the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure appropriate information is documented and/or communicated to the receiving healthcare institution for 1 of 31 sampled residents Resident #26. The findings included: For resident # 26 the facility staff failed to provide evidence that the receiving healthcare facility was provided adequate information to care for the resident on 3/31/24. Resident # 26's diagnoses included but were not limited to Type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, protein calorie malnutrition, congestive heart failure, hypertension, depression and chronic kidney disease. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 8/16/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. During a review of the clinical record, a progress note dated 3/31/24 at 11:16 PM read, Patient present with confusion and hallucination. Patient daughter called requesting that the patient be sent out. ____ called and stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of a bed hold being provided to 2 of 31 residents, Residents #26 and #71. The findings included: 1. Resident # 26's diagnoses included but were not limited to Type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, protein calorie malnutrition, congestive heart failure, hypertension, depression and chronic kidney disease. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 8/16/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. During a review of the clinical record, a progress note dated 3/31/24 at 11:16 PM read, Patient present with confusion and hallucination. Patient daughter called requesting that the patient be sent out. ____ called and stated that another course of action needed to be taken and to not send the patient out. Writer went into patient room again and patient is still hallucinating. Patient states that kids are in her room and that things are crawling on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate minimum data set (MDS) assessment for 2 of 9 closed record reviews, Resident #76 and Resident #25. The findings included: 1. For Resident #76 the facility staff incorrectly coded the resident's discharge MDS assessment. Resident #76's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to cellulitis and diabetes mellitus. Resident #76's discharge MDS with an assessment reference date of 06/14/24 coded the resident as being discharged to short-term general hospital (acute hospital). Resident #76's clinical record contained a nurse's progress note dated 06/14/24 which read in part, Resident discharged home with home health services. His transportation via wheelchair took him to his residence. All medications and paperwork was taken by the resident. Resident signed for his narcotics and other medications. Vital signs are within normal limits. All personal belongings were taken by the resident. Nursing educated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow provider orders for 2 of 9 closed record reviews, Residents #229 and #379. The findings include: 1. For Resident #229, the facility staff failed to complete provider ordered treatments to a surgical wound. Resident #229's diagnoses included, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, diabetes, and non-pressure related chronic ulcer of other part of left foot. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #229's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/04/23 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15. Per the MDS manual a score of 15=cognitively intact. Resident #229's comprehensive care plan included the focus area resident has risk of skin breakdown and actual impaired skin integrity. Interventions included administer medications/treatments as ordered. The clinical record included the following progress note documented on the residents admission to the facility .Wound type is skin graft…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 9 closed record reviews. (Resident #279). The findings were: For Resident #279, facility staff failed to administer Insulin Lispro (1 Unit dial) Solution Pen-Injector 100 UNIT/ML according to hospital discharge orders. Resident #279's stay at the facility was approximately two (2) days. The admission record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to sepsis, and osteomyelitis, left ankle and foot. The acute care hospital discharge summary listed the active problem of type 2 diabetes mellitus with complication, with long-term current use of insulin. Resident #279's minimum data set (MDS) [NAME] Report listed the resident's cognition having ok short-term and long-term memory. The resident was able to recall the season, room location, staff names/faces, and that the resident was in a nursing home. The MDS [NAME] read the resident was independent with daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to obtain a provider ordered laboratory test for 1 of 22 residents, Resident #20. The findings included: For resident # 20, the facility staff failed to obtain a Depakote level on 11/22/23 per physician's order. Resident # 20's diagnoses included but were not limited to unspecified dementia, bipolar disorder and depression. Resident # 20's minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 6/8/24 indicated that resident is severely cognitively impaired, they are rarely/never understood, rarely never understands others and decision making is severely impaired as well. During a review of resident # 20's Medication Regimen Reviews for the last year, a pharmacist Consultation Report with a date of 12/19/23, read in part, .has orders for labs but at the time of this review they were not available in the medical record. The missing lab values include: Depakote level every Wed related to bipolar disorder .Unless otherwise indicated, please ensure that ordered labs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility kitchen. The findings included: The facility staff failed to discard seven (7) containers of unsweetened coconut milk that had exceeded the best by date of 5/13/24. On 9/04/24 at 9:30 AM, in the presence of the Dietary Manager (DM), the surveyor observed seven (7) 32-ounce containers of unsweetened coconut milk each with a best if used by date of 5/13/24 present in the dry storage area of the facility kitchen. The DM removed the containers of unsweetened coconut milk from the dry storage area. On 9/05/24 at 10:40 AM, the survey team met with the Administrator, Director of Nursing, and the Clinical Services Manager and discussed the concern of out-of-date coconut milk present in the facility kitchen. No further information regarding this concern was presented to the survey team prior to the exit conference on 9/05/24.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and/or accurate clinical record for 3 of 31 sampled residents, Resident #379, Resident #9, and Resident #62. The findings include: 1. For Resident #379, the facility staff failed to document the resident's allergy to the medication Hydrocodone in the clinical record. This was a closed record review. Resident #379's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to End Stage Renal Disease, Edema, Depression, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Type 2 (two) Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Weakness, and Retention of Urine. The minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/22/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 14 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident #379 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices during medication administration for 1 of 2 nursing units, Unit #1. The findings included: For Unit #1, the licensed practical nurse (LPN) placed a resident's inhaler in their uniform pocket to transport into the resident's room prior to administration. On 9/05/24 at 8:43 AM, surveyor observed LPN #5 place a resident's Breo inhaler in the pocket of their uniform top to transport to the resident's room. LPN #5 removed the inhaler from their pocket and handed it to the resident for administration. When asked about placing the Breo inhaler in their pocket, LPN #5 stated they did not know if the resident would have tissues available in their room for use with their eye drops so they took theirs from the medication cart causing them to have extra items in their hands and they did not want to make two trips. On 9/05/24 at 10:40 AM, the survey team met with the Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Clinical Services Manager and discussed the concern of LPN #5 placing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer a pneumococcal vaccine in accordance with nationally recognized standards for 3 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #42, #49, and #72). The findings included: 1. For Resident #42, the facility staff failed to offer the resident a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 15 (PCV15) or a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 20 (PCV20) following admission to the facility. Resident #42's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Parkinson's Disease, and Generalized Muscle Weakness. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/02/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 8 out of 15 indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #42 was over the age of 65 years when admitted to the facility. Surveyor reviewed Resident #42's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer an updated 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccine for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #49), failed to provide evidence of education regarding the risks, benefits and potential side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine prior to the administration for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #2 and #42), and failed to provide evidence of consent prior to the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #42). The findings included: 1. For Resident #49, the facility staff failed to offer the resident an updated 2023-2024 formula COVID-19 vaccine. Resident #49's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Aortic Valve Stenosis with Insufficiency, and Essential Hypertension. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/13/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-03-18 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interview and review of facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 3 residents (#409, #50, and #35). The facility staff failed to protect Resident #409 from body exposure to public view and provide his personal clothing. Resident #50 and #35 were not provided dignity covers for bedside drainage bags. The findings included: 1. Resident #409 was originally admitted to the nursing facility on 1/30/21 with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, encephalopathy, cervical disc degeneration, and readmitted on [DATE] with an added diagnoses of TIAs (mini strokes), acute cystitis and kidney failure. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 3 out of a possible score of 15 which indicated the resident was severely impaired in the necessary cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #409 required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician of missed medication for one of 15 sampled residents, Resident #212. The findings included: Resident #212 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to chronic heart failure, closed fracture of the right tibia with healing, pain in right knee, and high blood pressure. Resident #212's most recent comprehensive MDS (Minimum data set) assessment was an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/4/21. Resident #212 was coded as being cognitively intact in the ability to make daily decisions; scoring 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Resident #212 was coded in Section J0100. (Pain Management) as not receiving scheduled pain medications in the last 5 days from the ARD date (7/4/21). Resident #212 was coded as receiving prn (as needed) pain medications in the last 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on representative interview, facility document review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure medications were procured for two of 15 residents in the survey sample; Resident #212 and #211. The findings included: 1. Resident #212 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to chronic heart failure, closed fracture of the right tibia with healing, pain in right knee, and high blood pressure. Resident #212's most recent comprehensive MDS (Minimum data set) assessment was an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/4/21. Resident #212 was coded as being cognitively intact in the ability to make daily decisions; scoring 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Resident #212 was coded in Section J0100. (Pain Management) as not receiving scheduled pain medications in the last 5 days from the ARD date (7/4/21). Resident #212 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interviews the facility's staff failed to afford the opportunity to get out of bed daily as desired for 1 of 36 residents (Resident #50), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #50 was originally admitted to the facility 12/3/14 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; Multiple sclerosis, diabetes and depression. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/27/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #50's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care of two people with transfers, total care of one person with bed mobility, personal hygiene, bathing, transfers, dressing, and toileting, and supervision after set-up with eating. An interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a medical record review, facility document review and staff interviews the facility The facility staff failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage was given timely prior to the last covered skilled day of 12/17/20 for 1 of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #59. The findings included: Resident #59 is a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Diabetes Mellitus, End Stage Renal Disease and Hypertension. Resident #59's medical record indicated the resident was discharged home on [DATE] at 11:00 A.M. The most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) for Resident #59 was a Discharge Assessment with a ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 12/18/20. Resident #59's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was a 15 out of a possible 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. Resident #59's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) document with Skilled Nursing Services ending on 12/17/20 was reviewed and is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews the facility's staff failed to maintain 1 of 36 residents (Resident #50), wheel chair in a clean and sanitary manner. The findings included: Resident #50 was originally admitted to the facility 12/3/14 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; Multiple sclerosis, diabetes and depression. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/27/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #50's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. On 3/17/21 at approximately 1:00 p.m., observation was made of Resident #50's wheel chair. A large amount of crumbs and other debris was observed on the side and beneath the seat cushion. An interview was conducted with Resident #50 on 3/17/21 at approximately 1:00 p.m. Resident #50 stated he wasn't aware of his wheel chair getting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide evidence that care plan goals were sent with one of 36 residents (Resident #15) upon transfer to the hospital on 1/7/21. The findings included: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to stroke, high blood pressure, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, and atrial fibrillation. Resident #15's most recent MDS (Minimum data set) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 1/23/21. Resident #15 was coded as being moderately impaired in cognitive function scoring 12 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Review of Resident #15's clinical record revealed that he was sent out to the hospital on 1/7/21 for a possible stroke. The following was documented in a nursing note dated 1/7/21: Resident at approximately 3pm resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to notify the Long Term Care Ombudsman of two residents (Resident #258 and #15) of transferring to the hospital in the survey sample of 36 residents. The findings included: 1. Resident #258 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This resident was diagnosed as having Tardue Dyskinesia, hypertension, anxiety, depression, Bipolar, Schizoaffective disorder, hyperlipidemia, and anemia. the ombudsman was not notified of Resident #258 transfer to the hospital. This resident was assessed being stand to pivot x 1 assist, alert and oriented times 1 to self. Resident noted to wander in other patient rooms and exit seeking. A wander guard placed on left ankle. A Nursing note dated 06/03/20 at 5:38 P.M. indicated: Resident noted cursing loudly, screaming, and speaking to self. Resident noted pulling pants down, while walking in hallway. A Nursing note dated 06/04/20 at 6:48 P.M. indicated: 'Police arrived, in contact with local…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide two residents (Resident #258 and #15) with bed hold policy notice upon transfer to the hospital in the survey sample of 36 residents. The findings included: 1. Resident #258 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This resident was diagnosed as having Tardue Dyskinesia, hypertension, anxiety, depression, Bipolar, Schizoaffective disorder, hyperlipidemia, and anemia. Resident #258 was not provided with a bed hold policy notice upon transfer to the hospital. This resident was assessed being stand to pivot x 1 assist, alert and oriented times 1 to self. Resident noted to wander in other patient rooms and exit seeking. A wander guard placed on left ankle. A Nursing note dated 06/03/20 at 5:38 P.M. indicated: Resident noted cursing loudly, screaming, and speaking to self. Resident noted pulling pants down, while walking in hallway. A Nursing note dated 06/04/20 at 6:48 P.M. indicated: 'Police arrived, in contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility staff failed to implement interventions, heel boots, in the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 36 Resident's in the survey sample, (Resident #6). The findings included: Resident #6 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to, Peripheral Vascular Disease and Moderate Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. Resident #6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/16/2020 was coded with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 03 indicating severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #6 as requiring total dependence of 2 for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility staff failed to failed to revise the care plan with a change in code status for one of 36 residents; (Resident #14) AND failed to ensure that the intervention, compression glove, was included in the comprehensive care plan for one of 36 residents, (Resident #27). The findings included: 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to atrial fibrillation, muscle wasting and atrophy, diverticulosis of the intestine, and vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance. Resident #14's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Assessment) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/7/21. Resident #14 was coded as being severely impaired in the ability to make daily decision on the Staff Assessment for Mental Status exam. Review of Resident #14's March 2020 POS (Physician Order Summary) revealed the following current order: Full Code. This order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on representative interview, staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice by signing off medications were administered to two of 15 residents; Residents #212 and #211 that were not available. The findings included: 1. Resident #212 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to chronic heart failure, closed fracture of the right tibia with healing, pain in right knee, and high blood pressure. Resident #212's most recent comprehensive MDS (Minimum data set) assessment was an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/4/21. Resident #212 was coded as being cognitively intact in the ability to make daily decisions; scoring 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Resident #212 was coded in Section J0100. (Pain Management) as not receiving scheduled pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to accurately obtain, assess and monitor weights per physician's order and plan of care for one resident, Resident #40 AND failed to ensure that 2 of 36 residents in the survey sample, (Resident #6, and #27) treatments were implemented. The findings included: 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and psychotic disorder. Resident #40's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 2/18/21. Resident #40 was coded as being severely impaired in cognitive function on the Staff Assessment for Mental Status Exam. Review of Resident #40's March 2020 POS (Physician Order Summary) revealed the following order: Weigh Resident Daily Notify MD (Medical Doctor) of 3 lb (pound) weight gain in one day/5 lb in one week.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure pain relief measures were provided to one of 15 residents in the survey sample, Resident #212 who requested pain medication on 7/13/21 and 7/14/21. The findings included: Resident #212 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to chronic heart failure, closed fracture of the right tibia with healing, pain in right knee, and high blood pressure. Resident #212's most recent comprehensive MDS (Minimum data set) assessment was an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/4/21. Resident #212 was coded as being cognitively intact in the ability to make daily decisions; scoring 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Resident #212 was coded in Section J0100. (Pain Management) as not receiving scheduled pain medications in the last 5 days from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure that 1 of 36 residents (Resident #10) in the survey sample had an order for Dialysis. The findings included: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #10 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to, HTN (Hypertension) and End Stage Renal Disease. Resident #10's admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/18/2020 was coded with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #10 as requiring supervision with setup help only with eating, limited assistance of 1 with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene, extensive assistance of 1 with transfer and physical help in part of bathing activity with assistance of 1. On 03/17/2021 review of Resident #10's Clinical Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility staff failed to acquire medications upon admissions for one resident (Resident #258) in the survey sample of 36 residents. The findings included: Resident #258 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This resident was diagnosed as having Tardue Dyskinesia, hypertension, anxiety, depression, Bipolar, Schizoaffective disorder, hyperlipidemia, and anemia. The facility staff failed to acquire medications upon admissions for Resident #258. This resident was assessed being stand to pivot x 1 assist, alert and oriented times 1 to self. Resident noted to wander in other patient rooms and exit seeking. A wander guard placed on left ankle. Resident #258 had a physician's order dated 06/03/20 for the following medications: Alendronate 35 milligrams (mg) tablet (1 tablet) oral one time weekly starting 06/03/20: Latanoprost 0.005% eye drops (1 drop) drops both eyes one time daily starting 06/03/20: Clonazepam 2 mg tablet (1 tablet) tablet oral two times daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the observation of 2 medication carts, 1 treatment cart and 1 medication room; the facility staff failed to dispose of expired medications and surgical supplies for two units. The facility staff failed to dispose of expired medications on Unit 1 and failed to discard two expired suture trays on unit 2. The findings include: On 3/17/21 at 11:09 AM an Inspection of Treatment Cart on Unit 2 was conducted with LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) #4. Two suture removal Tray kits with an expiration date of 11/01/2020 was found during the inspection. LPN #4 replied, I should have discarded them. On 03/17/21 at 2:11 PM on unit 1 an inspection of medication cart #1 was conducted with LPN #3. Upon visual inspection a house stock bottle of acetaminophen 500 mg with an expiration date of 1/2021 was seen. It had an opened date of 3/08/21. Located in the same medication cart was 1 bottle of Humalog insulin with an open date of 2/10/21. LPN #3 stated, I meant to take it out this morning. It's over twenty eight days. I should have discarded the insulin and Tylenol. Numerous attempts were made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #27. The findings included: 1. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Resident #27's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/13/2021 was coded with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #27 as requiring total dependence of one person with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing and supervision with setup help only for eating. On 03/17/2021 Resident #27's Clinical Record was reviewed and revealed the following: Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews and facility documentation the facility staff failed to have the required minimal committee members attend QAA meetings and failed to meet on a quarterly basis. The findings included: On 3/18/21 at approximately 11:16 AM, a review of the facilities QA/QAPI Plan was conducted and findings were discussed with the Administrator, DON (Director of Nursing), The Regional Director of Operations and The Regional Director of Clinical Services. A review of the QAPI Plan signature page revealed that the Medical Director/designee did not attend the required amount of meetings on the following meeting dates: 2/18/20, 5/21/20 and 5/28/20. The QAPI Plan also revealed that the required quarterly meetings were not conducted. The meetings were conducted on the following dates: 2/18/20, 5/21/20, 5/28/20, 11/30/20 and 2/26/21. No quarterly meetings were conducted in August 2020. (This should have been the 3rd quarterly meeting). The VP (Vice President) of Regional Operations stated, We purchased the nursing home in November 2020. Policy: Quality Assurance and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-03-28 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility failed to comply with regulations requiring the participation of the medical director at quarterly QAA meetings. Findings: The facility failed to comply with regulations requiring the participation of the medical director at quarterly QAA meetings. The administrator and DON were interviewed regarding the QAA committee on 3/28/19 at 2:45 PM. The facility administrator was asked how often the QAA committee held meetings. She stated the committee meet for quarterly meetings. The administrator provided the quarterly sign-up sheet for the committee members. The medical director had not signed the sheets for 12/18/18 or 3/19/19. The surveyor asked if anyone was designated to take the medical director's place on the two dates in question. The administrator said, no one had been designated to take his place but they sent the committee minutes to him after each meeting. The facility had no additional information to offer prior to the survey team's exit.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 21 residents in the survey sample (Resident #45). Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease with hemodialysis, diabetes mellitus, cardiopulmonary disease with oxygen dependence, hypertension, enteritis as a result of clostridium difficile infection, and chronic pain. On the admission minimum data set assessment with assessment reference date 2/23/19, the resident scored 15/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. During an interview, the resident reported receiving hemodialysis treatments 3 days per week., Clinical record review revealed a physician order fro hemodialysis treatments on Tuesday,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessments for 2 of 24 Residents, Resident #22 and #62. The findings included: 1. For Resident #22, the facility staff failed to code the Residents hospice status on the Residents significant change in status MDS assessment. The clinical record review revealed that Resident #22 had been admitted to the facility 08/22/18. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, dementia, Parkinson's disease, and malignant neoplasm of prostate. Section C (cognitive patterns) of the Resident significant change in status MDS assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/08/19 included a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) summary score of 7 out of a possible 15 points. Section O (special treatments, procedures, programs) had NOT been coded to indicate the Resident was receiving hospice care. The clinical record included a care plan that indicated the Resident was receiving hospice care effective 02/01/19. On 03/27/19 at 10:13 a.m., MDS coordinator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to implement the CCP (comprehensive care plan) for 1 of 24 Residents, Resident #53. The findings included: For Resident #53 the facility staff failed to implement a care plan for the use of bed rails. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to atrial fibrillation, end stage renal disease, hyperlipidemia, arthritis, osteoporosis, pelvic fracture, Alzheimer's disease, seizure disorder, malnutrition, and dementia. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 03/12/19 coded the Resident as 10 out of 15 is section C, cognitive patterns. Section G, functional status coded the Resident as 3/3 in the areas of bed mobility and transfer, which is the equivalent of extensive assistance/ two person physical assist. This is an admission MDS. Resident #53's CCP (comprehensive care plan) was reviewed and contained a care plan for Bed Rails are used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility staff failed to provide adequate ADL (activities of daily living) services to 1 of 18 residents at the facility (Resident #113). Findings: The facility staff failed to provide adequate ADL (activities of daily living) services for Resident #113. The resident's clinical record was reviewed. Resident #113 was admitted to the facility for skilled care on 3/19/19. Her diagnoses included diverticulitis, arthritis, hypertension, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (due to diverticulitis). The latest MDS assessment dated [DATE] coded the resident as cognitively unimpaired. Her ADL status was incomplete at the time of the survey. The resident 's initial CP (care plan), effective 3/20/19 coded the resident with significant ADL requirements. Due to weakness related to acute diverticulitis and post hemorrhagic anemia the resident required assistance with all self-care ADLs, bed mobility, transfers from bed to chair, and ambulation. The CP included interventions for staff assistance from physical and occupational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the highest practicable well-being for 3 of 24 Residents, Resident #6, #23, and #64. The findings included: 1. For Resident #6, the facility staff failed to ensure the Residents physician ordered pain medication was available and administered per the physicians order. The clinical record review revealed that Resident #6 had been admitted to the facility 02/15/15. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, complex regional pain syndrome I, depressive disorder, sleep apnea, and deep vein thrombosis. Section C (cognitive patterns) of the Residents significant change in status MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/31/18 included a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) summary score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. During an interview with Resident #6 on 03/28/19 at 10:40 a.m., the Resident verbalized to the surveyor that the facility had not applied her pain patch. Immediately after this interview, the surveyor approached LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, family interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure an accident free environment for 1 of 24 Residents, Resident #53. The findings included: For Resident #53 the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for fall mats at the bedside and failed to provide ¼ side rails per the physician's recommendation. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to atrial fibrillation, end stage renal disease, hyperlipidemia, arthritis, osteoporosis, pelvic fracture, Alzheimer's disease, seizure disorder, malnutrition, and dementia. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 03/12/19 coded the Resident as 10 out of 15 is section C, cognitive patterns. Section G, functional status coded the Resident as 3/3 in the areas of bed mobility and transfer, which is the equivalent of extensive assistance/ two person physical assist. This is an admission MDS. Resident #53's CCP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow up on pharmacy recommendations for 2 of 24 Residents, Residents #8 and #23. The findings included: 1. For Resident #8, the facility staff failed to follow up on a pharmacy recommendation from April 2018 in regards to the Residents prn (as needed) tramadol. The clinical record review revealed that Resident #8 had been admitted to the facility 11/09/17. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, difficulty in walking, chronic atrial fibrillation, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Section C (cognitive patterns) of the Residents annual MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/17/19 included a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) summary score of 12 out of a possible 15 points. The clinical record included a pharmacy recommendation dated 04/13/18 that read Recommendation: Seroquel, Tramadol, and Hydrocodone APAP have not be used in the last 45 days. Please consider discontinuing. A review of the March 2019…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 24 Residents were free of unnecessary medications, Resident #22. The findings included: The Residents clinical record included a prn (as needed) order for the antipsychotic medication haldol. The clinical record did not include any information to indicate the physician had reviewed this order and/or provided a rationale for the continued use of this medication. The clinical record review revealed that Resident #22 had been admitted to the facility 08/22/18. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, dementia, Parkinson's disease, and malignant neoplasm of prostate. Section C (cognitive patterns) of the Resident significant change in status MDS assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/08/19 included a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) summary score of 7 out of a possible 15 points. The Residents clinical record included orders for haldol oral concentrate as needed every 4 hours starting 02/05/19. The diagnosis was documented as restlessness and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed secure the narcotic box on unit 2 and on the back hall nursing cart on unit 1. The findings included: The narcotic box in the unit 2 medication room was not permanently affixed and the narcotic box on the back hall medication cart on unit 1 was unlocked. On 03/27/19 at 10:25 a.m., the surveyor and LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2 checked the unit 1 back hall medication cart. The narcotic box on this cart was found to be unlocked during this observation. This narcotic box included the following controlled medications oxycodone, lyrica, and lorazepam. There were 15 medication cards in this narcotic box. The medication cart was located in the hall LPN #2 was observed to be down the hall when the surveyor approached the medication cart. On 03/27/19 at 10:34 a.m., the surveyor and RN (registered nurse) #2 checked the medication room on unit 2. This medication room included a locked refrigerator inside this refrigerator the surveyor observed a narcotic box. The surveyor was able to remove this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for 1 of 24 Residents, Resident #23. The findings included: The facility staff failed to determine the Resident DNR (do not resuscitate) status. The clinical record review revealed that Resident #23 had been admitted to the facility 07/18/18. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stage III pressure ulcer to sacrum, dementia, degenerative disease of nervous system, essential tremor, spondylosis, and cerebrovascular disease. Section C (cognitive patterns) of the Residents significant change in status MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/12/19 had been coded 1/1/2 to indicate the Resident had problems with long and short term memory and was moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. The clinical record included a face sheet that listed the Resident as being a full code. Under the title of Advance Directive on the Residents comprehensive care plan the facility staff had documented that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 125 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 125; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WWBV HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2020 |
| ACORN, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 05/23/2022 |
| VOLPE, BENJAMIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2020 |
| WEISBERG, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2020 |
| NICOLUZAKIS, GREGORY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2020 |
| SABER GOVERNANCE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2020 |
| SHG MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2020 |
| JACKSON, ASHLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/28/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495287. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.