Rosemont Health & Rehab Center, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 267 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 111.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.475 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-09-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, complaint investigation, and family and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #297), in the survey sample of 46 residents, was free from sexual assault which resulted in harm. The findings included: Resident #297 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia, anemia, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, aphasia, and cerebrovascular disease. In the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], it was coded that this resident had a BIMS score of 3 out of a possible score of 15 which indicated severe impairment in the cognitive skills necessary for daily decision-making. Resident #297 required extensive assistance for bed mobility and was dependent on staff for transfers, dressing, grooming, eating, toileting and bathing. A Care Plan dated 06/07/21 indicated: Focus- Altered or at risk for altered behaviors and/or mood due to acute confusion. Goal- resident will display a positive affect. Interventions- Ensure the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-09-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a closed record review, complaint investigation, family and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to preserve evidence following an incident of sexual abuse for one resident (Resident #297) in the survey sample of 46 residents. The findings included: Resident #297 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia, anemia, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, aphasia, and cerebrovascular disease. In the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], it was noted this resident had a BIMS score of 3 which indicated the resident was severely impaired in the skills needed for daily decision-making. Resident #297 required extensive assistance for bed mobility and was dependent on staff for transfers, dressing, grooming, eating, toileting and bathing. A Care Plan dated 06/07/21 indicated: Focus- Altered or at risk for altered behaviors and/or mood due to acute confusion. Goal- resident will display a positive affect. Interventions- Ensure the resident feels safe in her environment. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, clinical record review, review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to administer physician ordered medications for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility 2/16/22 and readmitted on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses include Diabetes Mellitus without complications and Depression Unspecified. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/10/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #1's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section GG (Functional Abilities Goal) the resident was coded as requiring supervision with eating, requiring partial or moderate assistance with oral hygiene, requiring substantial/maximal assistance with toileting/hygiene, dependent with showering/bathing. According to the Medication Administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-09-22 · tag F0569 — pattern
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on information gleamed during a complaint investigation, family interview, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to convey within 30 days after the resident's discharge from the facility the resident's funds, and a final accounting of those funds, to the Resident and/or Representative for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #121), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #121 was originally admitted to the facility 10/18/2021 and was discharged from the facility 6/30/22, return anticipated. The Resident's diagnoses included; dysphagia, malnutrition, quadriplegia, a seizure disorder and a neurogenic bladder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/6/22 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems, an inability to recall and severely impaired daily decision making abilities. In section B (Hearing Speech, Vision) the resident was coded as rarely to never…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of nursing practices for 1 out of 40 residents (Resident #51) in the survey sample. The findings included: The facility staff failed to obtained daily weights per physician orders for Resident #51. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #51 included but are not limited to Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/12/22 coded the resident with a 15 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #51 total dependence of one with toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing, extensive assistance of one with bed mobility, transfer and dressing and supervision with eating with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Resident #51's person-centered care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to afford two residents (R#62 and R#38) in the survey sample the opportunity to participate in the care planning process. The findings included: Resident #62 was originally admitted to the facility 04/25/19 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; End Stage Renal Disease and Anxiety Disorder. The quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/18/22 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #62 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In sectionG(Physical functioning) of the MDS the resident was coded as requiring total dependence of two persons with bed mobility, toileting and bathing. Requires total dependence of one person with dressing and personal hygiene.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on information gleamed during a complaint investigation, family interview, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed the facility staff failed to ensure the resident's personal funds which exceeded $100.00 were kept in an interest bearing account until it was distributed to the Resident and/or Representative for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #121), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #121 was originally admitted to the facility 10/18/2021 and was discharged from the facility 6/30/22, return anticipated. The Resident's diagnoses included; dysphagia, malnutrition, quadriplegia, a seizure disorder and a neurogenic bladder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/6/22 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems, an inability to recall and severely impaired daily decision making abilities. In section B (Hearing Speech, Vision) the resident was coded as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure 2 of 40 residents in the survey sample, (Resident #32 and 81) were given the opportunity to formulate an advance directive. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #32 was given the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive. Resident #32 was originally admitted to the nursing facility on 09/25/21. Diagnosis for Resident #32 included but are not limited to Parkinson's disease, dementia and heart disease. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS) a significant change assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/13/22 coded Resident #32 with short and long-term memory problems and cognitive skills severely impaired-never/rarely made decisions. Resident #32's person-centered care plan created on 09/27/21 with a revision date of 07/11/2022 identified the resident has an advance directive as a full code. The goal set for the resident by the staff is to follow the residents' wishes. Some of the interventions to manager goal include…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure Medicare Beneficiary Notices in accordance with applicable Federal regulations, were issued to 2 of 4 residents (Resident #39 and #64) in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to issue an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) letter to Resident #39 who was discharged from skilled services with Medicare days remaining. Resident #39 was admitted to the nursing facility on 07/14/22. Diagnosis for Resident #39 included but are not limited to Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and COVID-19. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 09/18/22 coded Resident #39 a 08 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the SNF Beneficiary Notification provided by the facility was noted that Resident #39 was not issued a SNF ABN letter. Resident #39 started Medicare Part A stay on 07/14/22 and the last covered day was on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to send a care plan to include their goals when discharged and admitted to the hospital for 1 of 46 residents (Resident #50), in the survey sample. The findings included; The facility staff failed to send a copy of Resident #50's care plan to include their goals when discharged and admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #50 was originally admitted to the nursing facility on 10/22/21. Diagnosis for Resident #50 included but are not limited to Cerebrovascular accident (stroke) with left hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move one side of the body). Resident #50's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/03/22 coded a 13 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating no impaired cognitive skills for daily decision-making. A review of Resident #50's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to send a notice to a representative of the Ombudsman office for 1 of 46 residents (Resident #77), in the survey sample. The findings included: The facility staff failed to send a notice to a representative of the Ombudsman office for Resident #77's discharge to the hospital. Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for this resident included COPD, sepsis, CVA, dysphagia and hypotension. A review of the clinical records indicated this resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #77 was observed in bed with his eyes closed during the survey at 9:33 a.m. on 09/19/22. Resident #77 was also observed observed in bed watching television at 2:15 p.m. on 09/19/22. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed this resident as having a BIMS score of 1. This resident was assessed as total care in the areas of Activities of Daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to send a copy of the facility's bed hold policy for 1 of 46 residents (Resident #50), in the survey sample. The findings included: The facility staff failed to provide Resident #50 or resident's representative a copy of the bed hold policy when discharged and admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #50 was originally admitted to the nursing facility on 10/22/21. Diagnosis for Resident #50 included but are not limited to Cerebrovascular accident (stroke) with left hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move one side of the body). Resident #50's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/03/22 coded a 13 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating no impaired cognitive skills for daily decision-making. A review of Resident #50's quarterly MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP — 126 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA