No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Complete Care at Glendale West

6263 N Green Bay Ave, Glendale, WI 53209 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 94 certified beds · (414) 351-0543 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$11,180 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $11,180 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-29)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5650 N Green Bay Ave · (414) 247-9530 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1735 W Silver Spring Dr · (414) 351-0271 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6369 N Green Bay Ave · (414) 236-5165 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6400 N Milwaukee River Pkwy · (414) 461-0839 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1402 Fairfield Road · (414) 865-1411

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.6%16.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.1%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%2.7%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.2%5.7%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.1%18.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.7%16.9%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%5.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.3%24.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.9%15.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.8%82.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.4%23.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.1%15.5%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.3%CMS range 44.2–68.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.3–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.2–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.70
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
62.9%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 78.1 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.38 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.87 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.53 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-22)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2022-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure injuries, promote healing of pressure injuries, and prevent infection of pressure injuries for 4 (R274, R57, R63, and R55) of 6 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. *R274 developed a Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD) area to the sacrum on 9/8/2022 and the Care Plan was not revised with interventions to prevent further damage. The MASD progressed into an Unstageable pressure injury on 10/3/2022. The Unstageable pressure injury required hospitalization on 10/6/2022 due to infection and osteomyelitis requiring intravenous antibiotics where it was determined to be a Stage 4 pressure injury. The Facility failure to identify the causative factors for the MASD and revise the care plan based on the skin assessment to prevent a Stage 4 pressure injury created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 9/8/2022. Surveyor notified Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure 1 of 4 sampled residents (R13) reviewed for falls failed to provide adequate assistance during a transfer. R13 was to be transferred with the assist of 2 staff and per a therapy recommendation, those staff were to use a gait belt and pivot transfer. On 8/12/23, staff transferred R13 with a sit to stand lift without assistance. R13 fainted and fell out of the sit to stand lift resulting in a laceration to the head requiring sutures. Findings include: R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included syncope (fainting) and collapse. R13's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] indicated R13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, which indicated R13 was cognitively intact. the MDS also indicated R13 required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. R13's care plan includes a problem area of .ADL self-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record, the facility did not ensure 1(R1) of 1 resident was assessed by the interdisciplinary team to determine it was clinically appropriate to self-administer medication.*On 11/11/25 Surveyor observed a medication cup marked with R1's first name & noon with two white tablets.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Resident Self-Administration of Medication and dated 4/25 under policy documents It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's right to self-administer medication. A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safety. Under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines documents 1. Each resident is offered the opportunity to self-administer medications during the routine assessment by the facility's interdisciplinary team. 2. Resident's preference will be documented on the appropriate form and placed in the medical record.R1's diagnoses includes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview and record review, the facility did not ensure showers were provided for 3 out of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Findings Include: The facility policy, entitled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), dated 12/24, stated: The facility will comma based on the residence comprehensive assessment and consistent with the residents' needs and choices comma ensure a residence abilities in ADL's do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: - Bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care. Policy Explanation and compliance Guidelines: - A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition grooming and personal and oral hygiene. - The facility will maintain individual objectives of the care plan and periodic review and evaluation. The facility policy, entitled Resident Showers, dated 6/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents received assessment, treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R1) of 2 residents reviewed for a change in condition.*On 8/26/25 R1 received Oxycodone 5 mg during the night shift & rated his pain level at 8. This was the first time R1 received Oxycodone during the night shift & at this pain level. There was no assessment of what was causing R1's pain and other vitals. R1's physician ordered vital signs taken every day due to hypertension. The last vital sign documented in August is on 8/13/25. Interviews with CNA's revealed on 8/25/25 & 8/26/26 R1 was not feeling good, didn't look good and on the morning of 8/26/25 interviews revealed there was no urine in R1's urinary collection bag. R1 informed Surveyor he told the nurse his urine was loud and was informed this was due to his medication and he was going out for an appointment with the doctor. R1 was transferred from the doctor's office to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to reduce the transmission of disease and infection for 1 (R1) of 1 Residents.* Appropriate hand hygiene was not observed during incontinence cares for R1, R1's urinary collection bag was observed on the floor and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-I was not wearing a gown while removing the urinary collection bag off the floor and removing R1's pants who is on EBP (enhanced barrier precautions).Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene and dated 6/25 under Policy documents All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility. Under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines documents 1. Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with acceptable standards of practice.The facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions and dated 9/25 under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility did not ensure each Resident is treated with dignity and respect that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life. This occurred for 4 (R65, R68, R173, and R174) of 10 Residents reviewed for dignity. *R65 was observed to be in a gown during 3 days of the survey process and prefers to be dressed. *R68 was observed to be in the hallway by the nurse's station in a gown during the survey process. *R173 was observed to be in the dining room eating lunch in a gown. *R174 was observed walking down the hallway with therapy in a gown. Findings Include: The facility's Accommodation of Needs policy implemented 2/25 documents: .The facility will treat each Resident with respect and dignity and will evaluate and make reasonable accommodations for the individual needs and preferences of a Resident, except when the health and safety of the individual or other Residents would be endangered. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 3. Facility staff shall make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0572 — pattern
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 Residents (R172, R23, R13 and R65) of 18 sampled residents were fully informed of, but not limited to; resident rights, required financial information and options, and consent to treat prior to or upon admission. *R172 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and did not sign the admission agreement within a reasonable timeframe which includes facility information regarding: consent for treatment, financial agreement, and resident rights and responsibilities. R172 was discharged from the facility on 3/28/25, and did not acknowledge receipt of the admission agreement before discharge from the facility. On 3/22/25 R172 alleged $1800 was missing from the resident. Review of whether R172 was aware of the facility options/restrictions available to safeguard R172's belongings was reviewed. R172 was never provided or disclosed this information, to be included in the facility admission policy, as the admission agreement was not presented or signed By R172…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 5 (R13, R23, R65, R173, R322) of 18 Residents. *R13, R23, R65, and R173's baseline care plans were not completed within the required 48-hour timeframe. The facility did not provide evidence that the baseline care plan was reviewed with the resident or the resident's representative. *R322 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R322's baseline care plan was signed by facility staff as being complete on 12/24/24, which is not within the required 48-hour timeframe. R322's baseline care plan was not signed by R322. Findings include: The facility policy dated 8/24, titled Baseline Care Plan, documents, in part: The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care . The baseline care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident receiving an antidepressant medication was comprehensively assessed for use. This was observed with 1 (R40) of 5 resident medication reviews. * R40 was admitted to the facility on an antidepressant medication. There is not a comprehensive assessment for use of the medication, including indicators for use and non-pharmacological interventions. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure titled Use of Psychotropic Medication dated 2/25. The definition for adequate indications for use states: refers to the identified, documented clinical rationale for administering medication that is based upon an assessment of the resident's condition and therapeutic goals and after any other treatments have been deemed clinically contraindicated. For psychotropic medications, without documentation in the record explaining that the practitioner has determined that other treatments have been deemed clinically contraindicated, the indication for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not conduct a comprehensive assessment of depression/mood with the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), and Significant Change in Status (SCS) MDS, for 1 (R40's) of 18 sampled residents. * R40 was admitted to the facility with orders to receive Prozac (an antidepressant) daily. R40's admission MDS dated [DATE] and SCS MDS dated [DATE] do not fully assess R40's depression/mood symptoms to lead to a Care Area Assessment (CAA) and development of a comprehensive plan of care for R40 that addresses indicators for use, individual symptoms for R40 and intervention to include nonpharmacological interventions (Cross-reference F605). Findings include: R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Depression and Stroke. The Hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], includes orders for Prozac 20 milligram (mg), 3 capsules daily. The facility physician admission orders document Prozac 20 mg, 3 capsules every day for Depression. R40's admission Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents are accurately screened for a mental disorder prior to admission or prior to the expiration of a 30-day exemption for 2 (R41 and R13) of 4 residents reviewed for the PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review). *R41 did not have a PASARR level 1 screen resubmitted prior to the expiration of the 30-day exemption documented on the original PASARR level 1. *R13 did not have a serious mental illness documented on the PASARR level 1 which would have triggered the PASARR level 2 to be initiated. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program dated 8/2024 documents: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening. a. PASARR Level I - initial pre-screening that is completed prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not develop a comprehensive plan of care for residents on antidepressant medication. This was observed with 3 (R40, R6, & R71) of 18 residents reviewed for plans of care. * R40 and R6 were admitted to the facility on antidepressant medication and did not have a plan of care for their depression. * R71 did not have bowel or bladder care that included goals and interventions. Findings include: 1.) R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Depression and Stroke. The Hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], includes Prozac 20 milligram (mg), 3 capsules daily. The facility admission physician orders document Prozac 20 mg, 3 capsules every day for Depression. R40's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed on 3/4/25. This assessment documents daily use of an antidepressant medication. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) for Psychotropic Drug Use, completed by MDS Registered Nurse (RN) -C on 3/10/25, documents Prozac…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with vision impairment received proper treatment and assistive devices including arrangements for an optometrist (eye doctor) visit for 1 (R21) of 1 resident's reviewed for vision. R21 has not been seen by an optometrist since 8/20/21 and R21's last missed vision appointment on 11/18/22 was never rescheduled to evaluate R21's advancing vision issues with an active request and signed consent to receive vision care. Findings include: R21 was admitted on [DATE] which includes a diagnosis of legal blindness and other optic atrophy. R21's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating R21 has intact cognition. R21 has highly impaired vision with no corrective lenses, glasses or contacts. R21's active Physician Order, dated 10/5/23, documents, May be seen by Optometrist No directions specified for order. R21's Care Plan, date Initiated, 10/06/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safety to prevent an accident from occurring for 1 of 1 Resident (R65) reviewed for accidents. *R65's physician orders instructed 1:1 (one on one) supervision with all meals. Surveyor had observations during the survey process of R65 not receiving supervision with meals. Findings Include: The facility's Accidents and Supervision policy implemented 11/24 documents: .Policy: The Resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each Resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This includes: 1. Identifying hazard(s) and risk(s) 2. Evaluating and analyzing(s) and risk(s) 3. Implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s) 4. Monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions when necessary Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Identification of Hazards and Risks 2. Evaluation and Analysis 3. Implementation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication rate was below 5 percent in 1 (R422) of 3 residents observed receiving medications. The facility medication error rate was 16.67 percent. *R422 had medications that were not administered in the right dose or were omitted from the medications administered. R422 had insulin ordered and the wrong dose was drawn up in the syringe. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Administering Medications dated 12/28/2024 documents: 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. On 5/20/2025 at 7:56 AM, Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-L obtain R422's blood sugar. The result was 216. At 8:15 AM, Surveyor observed LPN-L prepare R422's morning medications and documented the medications as they were placed into the medication cup: -Allopurinol 100 mg -Aspirin 81 mg -Vitamin D 25 mcg -Docusate 100 mg -Furosemide 40 mg -Midodrine 5 mg -Acetaminophen 1000 mg LPN-L drew up 3 units of 70/30 insulin from the vial and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 (R122) of 1 resident reviewed for medication transcriptions. R122 had a hospital discharge order for Apixaban, an anticoagulant, 5 mg once in the morning and once at bedtime. The order was transcribed by the facility as Apixaban 5 mg once daily. R122 was a resident of the facility for 34 days and received the wrong dose of Apixaban on those days. Findings include: R122 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, dysphagia requiring a gastrostomy tube for nutrition and medication administration, and atrial fibrillation (a fluttering of the atria in the heart potentially causing blood clots to form and creating an increased risk for a stroke). R122 had an activated Power of Attorney (POA). R122 discharged from the facility on 1/6/2025 and was not a resident at the time of survey. Apixaban, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the medical record for 1 (R33) of 18 residents reviewed was complete accurately documented and readily accessible. *During the survey investigation, it was determined R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple pressure injuries that were not comprehensively assessed until 11/25/2024, three days after admission, and treatments were not documented as being completed from 11/22/2024 to 11/25/2024. On 5/28/25, after completion of the survey, the facility submitted hand written documents that were not part of the medical record that indicated details of wound assessments alleged to be completed on 11/22/24. The hand written forms did not include who completed the documentation and were not included as part of the formal medical record until concerns were raised by the surveyor. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Pressure Injury Prevention and Management dated 10/2024 documents: 3. c. Licensed nurses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (R45) of 11 residents observed. *R45 was placed in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and facility staff did not don a gown on when assisting R45 with cares. Finding Include: The Facilities Policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions revised 11/2024, documents: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug, resistant organisms. Policy explanation and compliance guidelines: . 4. High-contact resident care activities include: . G. Device care or use: central line, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, tracheostomy/ventilator tubes, hemodialysis catheters, pick lines, midline catheters. R45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that foods were prepared in a way that prevented the risk of foodborne illness for 5 of 10 sampled residents (R2, R5, R7, R8, R10). Interview with residents foud that juices from the chicken served on 11/16/24 was red and touched all other foods on their plates. There was no investgation to determine what may have happened/how the food could have been under cooked, the number of residents who may have been affected, or to determine what steps need to be taken in order to avoid potential food borne illness. Findings include: ~During an interview on 11/26/24 at 8:53 AM, R2 stated on 11/16/24 (weekend) she and other residents in the dining room were served undercooked chicken pieces. R2 stated the blood from the chicken contaminated the noodles, vegetables, and everything else on the plate. R2 was admitted on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R2 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to identify resident concerns as grievances and failed to provide a written response/resolution after receiving a grievance for 2 of 10 sampled residents (R2 and R3). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances, dated 01/2024 and provided by the facility revealed, It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal, or fear of discrimination or reprisal . Social Services has been designated as the Grievance Official . Grievance may be voiced in the following forums . a verbal complaint to a staff member or Grievance Official . The staff member receiving the grievance will record the nature and specifics of the grievance . forward the grievance form to the Grievance Official as soon as practicable . In accordance with the resident's right to obtain a written decision regarding his or her grievance, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable, at the appropriate temperature, for two of seven residents (Residents (R) 12 and R13) who were asked about food palatability out of 11 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect resident meal intakes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Record of Food Temperatures, dated 10/23 revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to record food temperatures daily to ensure food is at the proper serving temperature(s) before trays are assembled .Food temperatures will be verified using a thermometer which is both clean, sanitized and calibrated to ensure accuracy . Review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, Chapter 3.5 Assessing Holding Time and Temperatures and Date Marking, dated 2022 revealed, .Use of an infrared thermometer for verifying holding temperatures is not consistent with Food Code requirements since verifying only the surface temperature of the food may not alert to problems that exist under the food's surface . Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to monitor the delivery of narcotic medication for one of three residents (Resident (R)1) reviewed for medications in a total sample of nine residents. On 03/04/24, R1 no longer had any Oxycodone at the facility, needed a new prescription from the Physician, and the medication was not available until 03/08/24. This practice has the potential to affect residents' pain management. Findings include: Review of the undated Face Sheet located in R1's electronic medical record (EMR), under the Profile tab, revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of a stroke, breast cancer, osteoarthritis, anxiety, and asthma. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/04/24, located in R1's EMR under the MDS tab, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Per the MDS, R1 had pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review the facility failed to ensure food was served at palatable temperatures for two of nine sampled residents (Resident (R) 1 and R4) on one ([NAME] unit) of four units. This failure has the potential for decreased meal intake. Findings include: During an interview on 06/05/24 at 9:00 AM, Resident (R)1, who was alert and oriented, stated food was often cold when she received her tray, and the beverages were sometimes not cold enough. R1 stated she complained about the food several months ago and was told to ask the staff to reheat her food. R1 stated the staff would reheat her food when asked but some of the food did not taste good when reheated. R1 stated sometimes the food was still served cold. During an interview on 06/05/24 at 9:15 AM, R4, who was alert and oriented, stated sometimes the food was cold and the staff reheated the food in the microwave when asked. R4 said she did not like the taste of some foods when reheated. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility did not ensure that drugs and biological's used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and included the expiration date when applicable, and medications were stored in safe and secure storage (including proper temperature controls) for 1 medication room and 2 medication carts (Dover and [NAME] Medication carts) reviewed. Insulin's were were not labeled with residents' name and were not dated when opened. Expired stock medications were found in the medication room and medication cart and the refrigerator temperature, which stored medications, was below 36 degrees. Findings include: The Facility Policy and Procedure titled Labeling of Medications and Biological's revised 10/23 documents (in part) . . Policy: All medications and biological's used in the facility will be labeled in accordance with current state and federal regulations to facilitate consideration of precautions and safe administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared safely, for 71 of 75 Residents who eat food prepared by the kitchen. *The low temp dish machine did not properly sanitize dishes. *Food held in the food warmer on [NAME] Hall did not have a holding temperate taken prior to service of the meal. Staff plating the food did not wear a hair restraint. *Unit refrigerators located in the activity room and [NAME] Hall did not have a temperature log and were not having temperatures taken on a regular basis. Open food was not dated in the refrigerator on [NAME] Hall. Findings: The facility policy, entitled Dishwasher Temperature, dated 10/2023, states: It is the policy of this facility to ensure dishes and utensils are cleaned under sanitary conditions through adequate dishwasher temperatures. #1. All items cleaned in the dishwasher will be washed in water that is sufficient to sanitize any and all items. #4. For low temperature dishwashers (chemical sanitization):…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice related to assessment and monitoring a resident with a possible change of condition for 1 Resident (R422) of 12 Residents reviewed for change of condition. *R422 had abnormal vital signs recorded and a blood pressure medication held related to the vital signs. The nurse on duty did not update the physician regarding R422's abnormal vital signs and there was no documented follow up regarding the change in condition. Findings include: R422 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including quadriplegia and type 2 diabetes. R422's Minimum Data Set assessment, dated [DATE], documented R422 had a BIMs (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 14, indicating R422 was cognitively intact and R422 had hypertension. Surveyor reviewed R422's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and noted the following physician order: Metoprolol 50mg (milligrams), give one tablet by mouth two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R13) of 6 residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for residents at risk with swallowing guidelines. * R13 was assessed to have a pureed nectar thick diet due to swallowing concerns and was observed taking another resident's dessert. This dessert was not part of R13's approved consistency for diet and swallowing guidelines. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Policy and Procedure, Meal Supervision and Assistance dated 10/2022 and last reviewed on 2/2023, noting the following as applicable: 1. The resident will be prepared for a well-balanced meal in a calm environment, location of his/her preference and with adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents, provide adequate nutrition, and assure an enjoyable event. This includes: a. Identifying hazard(s) and risk(s) b. Evaluating and analyzing hazard(s) and risk(s) c. Implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s) 4. Monitoring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable temperatures for 3 of 8 residents. Residents on the Oakland Unit complained that breakfast foods were often cold which was confirmed during a test tray evaluation. Findings include: On 11/27/23 and 11/28/23, during confidential interviews with residents who resided on the Oakland unit, the residents were asked if the food was appetizing and served at a palatable temperature. Three residents, who wished to remain anonymous, stated breakfast foods were often cold when they received their breakfast trays in their rooms. On 11/28/23 the breakfast meal service was observed from the kitchenette off the main dining room from 8:14 AM to 9:26 AM. DA F (Dietary Aide) was observed placing the food items on plates, covering the plate with a plastic cover, and placing the plate in a food cart that was open in the front. There was no door on the food cart. On 11/28/23 at 9:01 AM, DA F started plating food for the meal trays on the Oakland unit. At 9:11 AM, after the last resident tray was plated, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility did not ensure residents received services with reasonable accomodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 18 (R62) residents observed on survey. R62 waited an extended period of time for her call light to be answered. When staff answered R62's call light R62 requested to lay down in bed and staff declined to do so. Findings include: R62 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include Cerebral Infarction, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Diabetes Mellitus type 2, Lymphoid Leukemia, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Adult Failure to Thrive and Osteoarthritis. Facility Policy and Procedure titled Answering the Call Light updated 3/8/22 documents (in part) . .The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs. Steps in the Procedure 1. When answering from the call light station, turn off the signal light. 2. Identify yourself and politely respond to the resident by his/her name. a. If the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R5) of 1 residents received the appropriate intervention for low blood glucose. On 7/4/22, R5's medical record documents R5 was experiencing a hypoglycemic episode. The nurses note indicate R5's glucose level was 50 and R5 was very diaphoretic, unable to focus or answer and was moaning. The nurses note indicate 911 was called but other interventions to address R5's hypoglycemia were not attempted. Findings include: The facility policy on Management of hypoglycemia dated 12/10/21 indicate: . 1. Classification of hypoglycemia: a. Level 1 hypoglycemia: blood glucose < (less than) 70 mg/dL (milligrams per decilitre) but > (greater than) 54 mg/dL; b. Level 2 hypoglycemia: blood glucose is <54 mg/dL; and c. Level 3 hypoglycemia: altered mental and/or physical status requiring assistance for treatment of hypoglycemia. 3. For Level 2 hypoglycemia (<54mg/dL); a. Administer glucagon (intranasal, intramuscular, or as provided) b. Notify provider; c. Remain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure 1 (R28) of 6 Residents reviewed for accidents had their care plan interventions implemented. R28's call light was observed on the floor, behind the bed's head board and not in R28's reach according to R28's fall care plan. Findings include: R28's diagnoses includes spinal stenosis, quadriplegia, schizoaffective disorder, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. The at risk for falls care plan initiated 2/21/22 & revised on 6/14/22 includes the following interventions: * Recommendation is to offer/provide resident alternative entertainment when offloading position does not allow her to see television. Initiated 6/13/22. * Anticipate my needs, and potential fall times. Initiated 2/21/22. * Assess for pain. Initiated 2/21/22. * Call light or personal items available and in easy reach or provide reacher. Initiated 3/10/22. * Keep environment well lit and free of clutter. Initiated 3/10/22. * Low bed, fall matt. Initiated 6/13/22. * Make sure my call light/personal belongings are in reach. Initiated 2/21/22. *…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents that were fed by enteral means or received medication through an enteral tube received appropriate treatment for 3 (R19, R63, and R66) of 4 residents reviewed with feeding tubes. *R19 received medication through the gastrostomy tube and tube placement verification was not done prior to administering the medication. *R63 and R66 had tube feeding supplies not always dated, were dated with a previous date; supplies were not changed daily as ordered. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Procedure: Administering Medications through an Enteral Tube dated 1/11/2022 states: 6. Verify placement of feeding tube: a. If you suspect improper tube positioning, do not administer feeding or medication. Notify the Charge Nurse of Physician. The facility policy and procedure entitled Confirming Placement of Feeding Tubes dated 12/14/2021 states: To Confirm Placement of an Existing Feeding Tube at Bedside: 1. The exit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure each Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 (R23) of 5 Residents reviewed. * R23's pulse was not taken two times a day prior to administering Metoprolol Tartrate Tablet 100 MG (milligrams) per physician orders. Findings include: The Administering Medications policy updated 12/28/2021 under policy interpretation and implementation includes documentation of: 22. As required or indicated for a medication, the individual administering the medication records in the resident's medical record: a. the date and time the medication was administered; b. the dosage; c. the route of administration; d. the injection site (if applicable); e. any complaints or symptoms for which the drug was administered; f. any results achieved and when those results were observed; and g. the signature and title of the person administering the drug. h. Any additional monitoring needed (blood pressure, pulse). R23's diagnosis includes hypertension. The physician orders dated 5/15/20 documents Metoprolol Tartrate Tablet 100 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 2 (R18 and R63) of 5 residents receiving psychotropic drugs received the appropriate for duration of an antianxiety and an antipsychotic medication had indications for use. * R18 was prescribed Seroquel (antipsychotic) without indications of use and without monitoring the specific behaviors for the medications. * R63 was prescribed Lorazepam PRN (as needed) without a duration of use for the medication. Findings include: 1. R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, seizure disorder, down syndrome and chronic respiratory failure. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/21/22 indicate R18 has cognitive impairment and has exhibited no behavioral symptoms including no behaviors regarding being physically or verbally aggressive towards others or self. The medical record indicates R18 was prescribed Seroquel 0.5mg every afternoon and Seroquel 1.0 mg every evening, upon admission. The pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility did not establish and maintain an infection control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 2 (R28 & R57) of 7 Residents. * CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-R was not wearing appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) when changing R28's colostomy bag. R28 is on enhanced barrier precautions. R28 was observed not to have appropriate hand hygiene during cares. * CNA-R was not wearing appropriate PPE during continence cares for R57 who is on enhanced barrier precautions. R57 was observed not to have appropriate hand hygiene during cares. Findings include: The Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy and Procedure last revised 7/22/2022 under purpose documents Multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. The implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) will reduce transmission of resistant organisms by employing targeted gown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-10-24 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of renal disease, dialysis dependent, and type 2 diabetes. The nurses note dated 8/8/22 indicates R32 was at the dialysis center located in the facility when R32 was complaining of chest pain. 911 was called and R32 was transported to the hospital. On 10/19/22, Surveyor asked Director of Nursing (DON) B for the written transfer notice R32 or R32's responsible party were given on 8/8/22. On 10/19/22, Surveyor was given the transfer and discharge notice form that indicates R32's responsible party was called and a message was left regarding the transfer to the hospital. There is no documentation R32 and/or R32's responsible party were given a written transfer notice. Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 of 4 Residents (R54, R32, & R55) reviewed for hospitalizations received the required transfer and discharge notice in writing which identified the date of transfer, reason for transfer, location of transfer, appeal rights,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-10-24 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3.) R55 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Adult Failure to Thrive, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Cerebral Infarction, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Anxiety Disorder, Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Dementia, Metabolic Encephalopathy and Chronic Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure. On 9/8/22, R55's medical record documents, Patient sent to [name of hospital] for low oxygenation, 73% with 5L (liters) of O2 (oxygen), BP (blood pressure) 140/80, HR (heart rate) 41-56, T (temperature) 96.7, BS (blood sugar) 127. Patient had clammy skin to touch. Also c/o (complained of) hard to breath. No chest pain. (Physician) was notified and ordered to send to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. POA (Power of Attorney) was notified. Ambulance called for transport and ED (emergency department) nurse to nurse report was completed. Surveyor noted there was no documentation or evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$11,180 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $11,180 — penalty dated 2023-11-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 84 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Complete Care At Chestnut Hill LLCPassaic, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At HagerstownHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Harston Hall LLCFlourtown, PA 1 of 5Complete Care At Kimberly Hall NorthWindsor, CT 1 of 5Complete Care At Laplata LLCLaplata, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Milford Manor LLCWest Milford, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At Wayne Hills Rehab & Resp CenterWayne, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care at Care AgeBrookfield, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at KensingtonWaukesha, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Maple Grove LLCMadison, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Margate ParkChicago, IL 1 of 5Complete Care at the BoulevardChicago, IL 2 of 5Complete Care At Brakeley ParkPhillipsburg, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Fox HillVernon, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At Harborage LLCNorth Bergen, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Harrington CourtColchester, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At HyattsvilleHyattsville, MD 2 of 5Complete Care At Inglemoor, LLCEnglewood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Monmouth, LLCLong Branch, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Ocean Grove LLCOcean Grove, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Prospect Heights LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Regent LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Christian Home LLCWaupun, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Grande PrairiePleasant Prairie, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Heritage LLCDundalk, MD 2 of 5Complete Care at Linwood, LLCLinwood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Nazareth LLCStoughton, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Voorhees, LLCVoorhees, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Wall LLCWall, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Fair Lawn EdgePaterson, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Holiday CityToms River, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Lehigh LLCMacungie, PA 3 of 5Complete Care At Oak Ridge LLCCharleston, WV 3 of 5Complete Care At Orange ParkEast Orange, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Phillipsburg, LLCPhillipsburg, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Severna Park LLCSeverna Park, MD 3 of 5Complete Care At Shrewsbury LLCShrewsbury, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Silver Lake LLCDover, DE 3 of 5Complete Care At SpringbrookSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Complete Care at Brick LLCBrick, NJ

Showing 40 of 84; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PC GLENDALE HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/02/2024
SMS 2021 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF95%since 04/30/2021
STEIN, SHALOMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2021
BIELINSKI, RENEEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/11/2022
HAYDEN, LAKISHAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2021
HELLMAN, YOSEFIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2021
KELLY, DENISEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2021
ROSICH, ALEKSANDARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2021
DES CAPITAL LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2021
GLENDALE WI PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2021
JRK INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2021
PEACE CAPITAL HOLDINGS II LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2021
WI 6 PROPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2021
WI 6 PROPCO TOPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2021
KLUGMAN, JACOBIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2021
STERNBUCH, DANIELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 5%Other / private 13%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$318per resident / day
operating cost
$9,661per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$327per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525547. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next