No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Complete Care at Ridgewood LLC

3205 Wood Rd, Racine, WI 53406 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 200 certified beds · (262) 554-6440 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (262) 554-6440 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2621 S Green Bay Rd · (262) 504-6150 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6125 Durand Ave · (262) 554-6116 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5430 Durand Ave · (262) 459-1455 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2800 Ohio St · (262) 619-5630 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3015 Pritchard Dr · (262) 554-7747

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.9%16.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.5%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.7%2.1%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.5%2.7%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms44.4%5.7%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.8%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.2%18.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.5%16.9%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.8%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.3%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.7%24.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.2%15.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.8%82.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.5%23.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.2%15.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.281.661.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.072.291.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 192 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.9%CMS range 47.4–62.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.3%CMS range 9.4–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge61.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.3%CMS range 3.1–8.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.78
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.71
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.48
RN hoursweekends
60.3%
Total nursing turnover
60.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 103.9 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 96 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-12)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 4 of 4 (R52, R82, R92, and R199) residents reviewed. R199 did not have a follow up assessment and monitoring of urinary symptoms following identified change in condition and physician orders were not followed. R199 was admitted to the hospital for a change in condition after orders were not followed to monitor R199 and push fluids. R52 did not have neurological assessments completed following falls according to facility policy. R82 did not have neurological assessments completed following falls according to facility policy. R92 did not have neurological assessments completed following falls according to facility policy. Findings include: 1.) R199 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include paraplegia, urinary elimination alteration due to neurogenic bladder secondary to paraplegia, history of renal mass and urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for individuals with a mental disorder and notify the state authority of a significant change in mental illness for 1 (R1) of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR screening.*R1 had a completed PASARR with an admission date of 10/15/25, with a 30-day exemption. R1 remained in the facility and a new PASARR was not completed despite changes in R1's psychiatric diagnoses and medication changes. Findings Include:The facility's Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program policy and procedure reviewed/revised 1/26 documents:Policy:.This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:.1. All applicants…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R8) of 13 residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice.R8 was re-admitted back to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] with a [NAME] monitor (a wearable battery powered device that continuously records the heart's electrical activity) in place and instructions that it needed to be worn for 7 to 14 days. Facility staff did not enter an MD order for the [NAME] monitor use. Facility staff did not enter a care plan intervention for the [NAME] monitor. Facility staff did not provide documentation that R8's [NAME] monitor was functioning and in place every shift from readmission on [DATE] until R8 was discharged from the facility on 12/15/25. Findings include:On 4/6/26, Surveyor asked Director of Nursing (DON)-B for the facility policy regarding admission orders/following MD orders. DON-B returned to Surveyor with the following policy regarding orders: The facility policy dated 2025 and titled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent new pressure injuries from developing for 2 (R8 and R11) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. *R8 was admitted to the facility with an unstageable pressure injury. On 10/30/25, R8's pressure injury was assessed as a stage 3 pressure injury. On 11/6/25 and 12/11/25, R8 was readmitted to the facility after a hospital stay. Facility staff incorrectly staged R8's pressure injury as a stage 2 on these readmissions. In addition, R8's Wound MD changed R8's wound treatment on 11/20/25 and 12/4/25. Facility staff did not update R8's treatment order and R8 was treated with the incorrect treatment from 11/20 to 11/26/25 and 12/4 to 12/8/25. *R11 has an Unstageable pressure injury to the left heel. R11's Skin Integrity Care Plan has the intervention to have heel boots on when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R58) of 4 residents reviewed received medically related social services to address individual Resident needs in order to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.R1 was admitted to the facility and started demonstrating sexually inappropriate behaviors. In December of 2025 R1 was diagnosed as having an Unspecified Mood Affective Disorder and was started on an antidepressant for anger and sexual inappropriateness. In February of 2026 R1 was diagnosed with an Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood. In March R1 started on Depakote Sprinkles along with Ativan as needed for behaviors. During this period of time staff and psychiatric practitioners documented on R1 sexual behavior. Individuals interacting with R1 expressed concern regarding his behaviors towards others; there were recommendation from the psychiatric nurse practitioner to supervise R1. These changes and recommendations were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with special dietary needs received the appropriate food for 1 (R12) of 4 residents reviewed on a mechanically altered diet.R12 was on a mechanically soft diet and was observed to have tortilla chips, not a mechanically soft diet food.Findings include:The facility policy and procedure titled Non-Compliance with Physician Order Diet/Thickened Liquids undated documents: POLICY: To manage those residents who consistently refuse to accept the physician-ordered diet. In long term care facilities, Diet orders must be followed. When the diet order is not acceptable to the resident, the facility attempts to obtain a different diet order, or to make acceptable substitutions to encourage adequate intake by the resident.PROCEDURE: 1. When residents insist on being served foods that are not allowed on their diets, Or refuse those foods that are on their diets, the dietary manager, with consultation from the Dietitian as necessary, will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor fluids offered and consumed by a resident to ensure fluid intake was in accordance with a physician order for a 1500 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction for 1 (R4) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for dehydration.Findings included:A facility policy titled, Fluid Restriction, dated 2025, revealed It is the policy of this facility to ensure that fluid restrictions will be followed in accordance to (sic) physicians' orders. Policy Explanation: Fluid restrictions are basically the restriction of fluid intake. This may be due to underlying medical conditions that may cause fluid buildup such as congestive heart failure or end stage renal disease (ESRD), in addition to electrolyte imbalance disorders such as hyponatremia. Fluid restrictions amounts can vary according to the resident's condition and the physician's judgment.An admission Record indicated the facility admitted R4 on 10/03/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnoses of chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R13) of 20 sampled residents care plans were revised accordingly.R13's care plan was not revised after R13 had a catheter re-inserted for urine retention.Findings include:The facility policy titled Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change reviewed/revised 5/2025 documents: Policy: The purpose of this procedure is to provide a consistent process for reviewing and revising the care plan for those residents experiencing a status change.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:1. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change.2. Procedure for reviewing and revising the care plan when a resident experiences a status change: .b. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) coordinator and the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) will discuss the resident condition and collaborate on intervention options.d. The care plan will be updated with the new or modified interventions. h. The Unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility did not ensure facility stock medications were not expired in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms.- 1 bottle of Calcium with Vitamin D 600 mg/400 IU with an open date of 11/22 and expiration date of 7/2025.- 2 unopened bottles of Aspirin 325 mg with an expiration date of 6/2025.- 1 bottle of Iron 27 mg with an open date of 1/23/2025 and an expiration date of 4/2025 and 2 unopened bottles of Iron 27 mg with an expiration date of 4/2025.Findings include:On 8/12/2025, at 8:18 AM, Surveyor observed in the 2nd floor medication room (2-East) in the stock medications cabinet the following expired medications:- 1 bottle of Calcium with Vitamin D 600 mg/400 IU with an open date of 11/22 and expiration date of 7/2025.- 2 unopened bottles of Aspirin 325 mg with an expiration date of 6/2025.- 1 bottle of Iron 27 mg with an open date of 1/23/2025 and an expiration date of 4/2025 and 2 unopened bottles of Iron 27 mg with an expiration date of 4/2025.On 8/12/2025, at 8:47 AM, Surveyor interviewed registered nurse unit manager (RNUM)-D who stated RNUM-D…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 5 residents needing assistance with bathing received the necessary services for cares. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 2/8/25. R2 went from 1/25/25 until 2/7/25 without receiving a shower/bath. R2 should have received a shower/bath on 1/31/25 according to the plan of care. Findings include: R2 is a [AGE] year-old resident who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis, Myasthenia [NAME], subdural hemorrhage, epilepsy, abnormal posture, and colostomy. R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on 1/20/25 documents that R2 is dependent with toileting, showering, dressing and transfers. R2 was documented as having a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating that R2 has severe cognitive impairment. Surveyor reviewed R2's bathing documentation which documents R2 was to receive showers every Friday on the evening shift. The documentation indicates a shower was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral palsy, gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis with bleeding, protein-calorie malnutrition with a gastrostomy tube for all nutrition, anemia, and chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins. R7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented R7 was severely cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 and had impairment to both arms and legs requiring maximum to total assistance with all activities of daily living and bed mobility. The MDS documented R7 received all nutrition through the gastrostomy tube. The MDS documented R7 had a Deep Tissue Injury that was present upon admission and had a pressure reducing device for the chair and bed and received pressure ulcer care. R7's Skin Impairment Care Plan dated 6/26/2024 documented R7 had deep tissue injuries to the five toes on the left foot. R7's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented R7 did not have any pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 (R4 and R2) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. *R4 had unwitnessed falls on 1/17/2025, 1/19/2025, 2/4/2025, and 2/13/2025. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the falls to determine a root cause of each fall and develop personalized interventions to prevent future falls. *R2 had two unwitnessed falls on 1/17/2025 and 2/7/2025. The facility did not thoroughly investigate these falls. There is no evidence of a comprehensive assessment to determine when R2 was last observed, when R2 was provided toileting cares, staff statements, whether R2's call light was within reach at the time of the fall, and a thorough investigation to determine a root cause to determine necessary preventative interventions. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Fall Prevention Program dated 4/2024 documents: Policy Explanation and Compliance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a sanitary environment was maintained to help prevent the development and transmission of infections during wound care for 1 (R7) of 1 residents observed during wound care. *R7 had a treatment to the right calf pressure injury and hand hygiene was not performed between dirty and clean aspects of the treatment. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Hand Hygiene dated 4/2024 documents: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with accepted standards of practice. 2. Hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed under the conditions listed in, but not limited to, the attached hand hygiene table. 6. Additional considerations: a. The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves, and immediately after removing gloves. The attached Hand Hygiene Table…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the family member and Activated Responsible Party (FM1) of one Resident (R1) out of nine residents reviewed in the sample was provided with information required to make informed decisions about the residents health care. FM1 was not notified prior to rehabilitation services being discontinued for R1. This failure created the potential for the resident's rehabilitation services to be unnecessarily and/or prematurely discontinued. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Notification of Changes dated 01/2024 read, in pertinent part, The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification. Review of R1's admission Record, dated 12/06/24 and found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile Tab, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of nine sample residents (Resident (R) 6) had her preferences honored. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Accommodation of Needs, provided by the facility, with a revised date of 02/24, revealed The facility will treat each resident with respect and dignity and will evaluate and make reasonable accommodations for the individual needs and preferences of a resident, except when the health and safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered. The policy further revealed Based on individual needs and preferences, the facility will assist the resident in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well being to the extent possible. Review of R6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated her cognition was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one comprehensive care plan for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) was implemented for one of nine sample residents (Resident (R) 4) reviewed for care plans. This failure had the potential to put R4 and other residents at risk for infections. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans provided by the facility with a revised date of 02/24, revealed It was the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-center care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment .The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and infection control for one of nine sample residents (Resident (R) 4) reviewed for infection control precautions. The failure had the potential to put the residents at risk for the spread of an infection. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Clean Dressing Change, provided by the facility, with an implemented date of 11/23 and reviewed/revised on 09/24, revealed It is the policy of this facility to provide wound care in a manner to decrease potential for infection and/or cross-contamination. Physicians' orders will specify type of dressing and frequency of changes. The policy further revealed to set up clean field on the overbed table with needed supplies for wound cleansing and dressing application: a. If the table is soiled, wipe clean. b. Place a disposable cloth or linen saver on the overbed table. c. Place only the supplies to be used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Medical equipment was not sanitized between resident use potentially affecting 3 (R36, R15, and R86) of 3 residents reviewed for monitoring of blood sugars and the handling of dirty laundry was not kept separate from the clean laundry potentially affecting all 92 residents in the facility. *An observation was made of Registered Nurse (RN)-K wiping off an EvenCare glucometer with an alcohol wipe. RN-K did not use a disinfectant wipe to clean the glucometer. RN-K had checked blood sugars on R36, R15, and R86 without disinfecting the glucometer between residents potentially exposing those residents to blood borne pathogens. *Observations were made of Laundry Aide-M handling dirty laundry while wearing a gown. The gown was not removed before Laundry Aide-M handled clean linen from the dryer. Findings include: 1.) The facility policy and procedure entitled Blood Glucose Monitoring dated 1/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not treat residents with dignity when administering insulin for 2 (R33 and R55) of 2 residents observed receiving insulin. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-G administered insulin to R33 in the hallway by the nurses' station with other residents present. LPN-G checked R55's blood sugar and then administered insulin to R55 in the TV room with another resident present. No privacy was provided to R33 or R55. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Timely Administration of Insulin dated 1/2024 states: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 5. d. Explain procedure and provide privacy. On 5/1/2024 at 8:22 AM, Surveyor observed LPN-G standing at the medication cart next to the nurses' station. LPN-G dialed up the dose on the insulin pen for R33. R33 was in a wheelchair in the middle of the hallway next to the medication cart. Other residents were in the hallway and dining room getting ready for breakfast. The dining room was located across from the nurses' station. LPN-G administered R33's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for assessing non-pressure wounds for 2 (R188 and R190) of 2 residents reviewed with non-pressure injuries. R188's non-pressure injuries were not comprehensively assessed on admission. R190's non-pressure injuries were not comprehensively assessed on admission. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Skin Assessment dated 10/2023 states: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. A full body, or head to toe, skin assessment will be conducted by a licensed or registered nurse upon admission/re-admission, daily for three days, and weekly thereafter. The assessment may also be performed after a change of condition or after any newly identified pressure injury. 7. Documentation of skin assessment: a. Include date and time of the assessment, your name, and position title. b. Document observations (e.g. skin conditions,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents with pressure injuries received care consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing for 4 (R188, R62, R14, and R12) of 5 residents reviewed with pressure injuries. *R188 was admitted to the facility with pressure injuries that were not comprehensively assessed on admission and the air mattress was observed to be not set according to R188's weight. *R62, R14, and R12 had pressure injuries and observations were made of their air mattresses not to be set according to their weight. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Pressure Injury Prevention and Management dated 10/2023 states: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 3. Assessment of Pressure Injury Risk . c. Licensed nurses will conduct a full body skin assessment on all residents upon admission/re-admission, weekly, and after any newly identified pressure injury. Findings will be documented in the medical record. 4.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R29) of 1 Residents reviewed with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. R29 has limitations in range of motion to R29's left upper extremity. The facility did not apply R29's left hand splint as per R29's Care Plan. Findings include: The Facility policy, entitled Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion, dated 2/2023, states, in part: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility in collaboration with the medical director, director of nurses and as appropriate, physical/occupational consultant shall establish and utilize a systematic approach for prevention of decline in range of motion, including the assessment, appropriate care planning and preventative care . 3. Appropriate Care planning. A. Based on the comprehensive assessment, the facility will provide interventions, exercises and/or therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R75) of 6 residents reviewed for weight received the necessary services to assist with nutritional maintenance. * R75 had a significant weight loss of 23 pounds (LBS) or 10.7% in 8 days which was not addressed by the Dietician or notification given to R75's physician. Findings include: On 5/6/24 the facility's policy titled, Weight Monitoring dated 1/24 was reviewed and read: A significant change in weight is defined as a 5% change in weight in 1 month (30 days). The physician should be informed of a significant weight change. The Registered Dietician should be consulted to assist with intervention: actions are recorded in the nutrition progress notes. R75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diabetes Type 2, Dysphasia and Dementia. R75's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R75 did not have significant weight loss or gain during the assessment reference period. On 5/5/24 R75's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure the accurate administration of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (R15) of 5 residents reviewed for medications. R15 has a Medical Doctor (MD) order for a daily Lantus injection (Lantus is a long-acting insulin used to control blood sugar). Registered Nurse (RN)-K did not follow the MD order on 4/10/24, 4/18/24 and 4/24/24 and the Lantus injection was not given by RN-K. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Medication Administration, dated April 2024, states, in part: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice . R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/24/24, indicates that R15 is cognitively intact and that R15 receives insulin injections…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility did not ensure safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This deficient practice was noted for 7 (R61, R52, R18, R26, R90, R32, and R199) of 22 Resident rooms reviewed for cleanliness. Findings include: On 1/26/23 at 12:40 PM, Surveyor interviewed Housekeeping/Laundry Supervisor (HLS)- I in regards to the observations of environmental concerns. HLS-I stated that a daily clean consists of emptying the garbage, wiping down the garbage can, cleaning all touch points like knobs, sweeping and mopping the room floor, cleaning the bathroom including sink and toilet and mopping the bathroom floor. HLS-I stated each Resident room gets a deep clean 2 times per month by moving all the furniture out, windows, and baseboards. HLS-I explained that each housekeeper has 28 Residents they are responsible for housekeeping for plus med rooms and bathrooms in the common area. Surveyor asked HLS-I if the department has been adequately staffed in order to keep the Resident rooms clean and comfortable. HLS-I stated that staffing has been colorful…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with a pressure injury or at risk for pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure injuries and to promote healing for 4 of 7 (R34, R61, R8, and R90) residents reviewed for pressure injuries. *R34 developed a blister on their right heel that was identified on 12/8/2022. There was not a comprehensive assessment completed on R34's right heel pressure injury until 12/20/22. *R61 was identified to be at high risk for developing pressure injuries. R61 was observed without a cushion in their wheelchair during survey. *R8 was observed without their heels floated during survey per their plan of care. R8's air mattress was not being checked for function per shift. *R90 was identified to be at risk for developing pressure injuries. R90 was observed with their heels not floated off the mattress during survey per their plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility policy and procedure review, and interview, the facility did not ensure a safe smoking environment for residents and visitors. This had the potential to effect all 7 (R150, R55, R300, R42, R29, R17 and R54) of 7 assessed resident smokers. This also had the potential to effect anyone that utilized the designated smoking area for the facility. The facility designated smoking area did not include a fire extinguisher, nor did the facility lobby area. There were observations of individuals smoking in the designated area and in front of the facility entrance. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure for Smoking, dated 10/10/22, was reviewed by Surveyor. This procedure includes that there is to be a fire extinguisher in the designated smoking area; and there is to steps to minimize second hand smoke to families, staff, and other residents. On 1/24/23 at 11:29 AM Surveyor observed the designated smoking area. Surveyor did not observe a fire extinguisher. On 1/24/23 at 12:03 PM Surveyor observed a resident and visitor smoking in the designated area.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure medications requiring refrigeration were stored at the appropriate temperature for 2 of 3 medication room refrigerators reviewed. This has the potential to affect 9 (R74, R17, R15, R85, R82, R11, R67, R8, and R39) of 9 residents observed to have medications stored in medication room refrigerators. *Observation of the second-floor east medication room refrigerator temperature log documented the facility was not monitoring the medication room refrigerator temperature daily to ensure proper storage of medications that require refrigeration. Monitoring was not completed for 5 days in the month of January. Surveyor also observed 8 cans of alcoholic beverages being stored in the medication room refrigerator with medications labeled for resident use. *Observation of the first-floor west medication room refrigerator temperature log documented the facility was not monitoring the medication room refrigerator temperature daily to ensure proper storage of medications that require refrigeration. Monitoring was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure residents were treated with dignity and care that promotes their quality of life. This was observed with 2 (R26 and R151) of 22 residents reviewed. * R26 was observed with their Foley drainage bag uncovered. * R151 was observed with their Foley drainage bag uncovered and did not have their personal clothes to wear for days. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure for Catheter Care, revised 10/1/22, was reviewed by Surveyor. The policy indicates: Privacy bags will be available and catheter drainage bags will be covered at all times when in use. The facility's policy and procedure for Resident's Personal Inventory, revised 5/2022, was reviewed by Surveyor. The policy indicates the facility will do an inventory list when a resident is admitted and ongoing to protect personal property and prevent loss. 1. On 1/23/23 at 10:03 AM Surveyor observed R26 in their room. R26 had a Foley drainage bag hanging on their nightstand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not promote or facilitate the residents choice for sleep schedules and health care. This was observed with 2 (R39 and R85) of 22 residents reviewed. * R39 gained weight in the facility and was not offered any alternate dietary diet to assist with weight control and/or loss. * R85 sleep preferences were not implemented by staff. Findings include: 1. On 1/23/23 9:54 AM, Surveyor spoke with R39 in their room. R39 indicated they just do jigsaw puzzles in their room and watches television. R39 is in a wheelchair and indicated they have gained a lot of weight while residing in the facility. On 1/24/23 at 10:59 AM, Surveyor conducted a Resident Group. R39 expressed they have gained a lot of weight in the facility. Their knees hurt and they just eat and sleep here. Surveyor reviewed R39's medical record. R39's Plan of Care for Potential for Weight Change dated 5/21/2020 is related to obesity with unplanned weight gain. The Interventions include:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R62) of 4 Residents reviewed for weight loss received the necessary care and services to assist with nutritional maintenance. *R62 was admitted on [DATE] and the first weight obtained on R62 was 10/2/22. Further, R62 has a physician's order as of 11/11/22 to obtain daily weights and this was not completed by the facility. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility weight monitoring policy and procedure dated 10/2022 and noted the following: .Policy: Based on the Resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all Residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the Resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or Resident preferences indicate otherwise. Compliance Guidelines: Weight can be useful indicator of nutritional status. Significant unintended changes in weight (loss or gain) or insidious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident with a gastrostomy tube received the appropriate care and services for a resident with a gastrostomy tube. This was observed with 1 (R90) of 2 residents with a gastrostomy tube. R90 has a gastrostomy tube that was not flushed or care planned after feeding was discontinued. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure for Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes, dated 10/2022, was reviewed by Surveyor. The policy includes: the resident's plan of care will address the use of feeding tube, including strategies to prevent complications; Directions for staff for providing care, including water flushes and skin care. On 1/23/23 at 11:31 AM Surveyor observed R90 in their bed. Surveyor observed on the over bed table there are 2 large Styrofoam cups with straws. Surveyor observed there was a large, tan colored and moist appearing area on R90's blanket by their upper abdomen area. There was a tube feeding syringe with a container on the bed side table. Surveyor reviewed R90's medical record and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not have evidence of ongoing communication and collaboration between the facility and the dialysis center for the care and services of 1 of 1 Residents (R62) reviewed who was receiving dialysis. *R62 did not always have evidence of assessment of R62's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis, specifically obtaining R62's pre-weight by the facility staff and did not have ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis center. The form contains documentation from the dialysis center and serves as a communication tool between the facility and the dialysis center. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Hemodialysis policy and procedure reviewed/revised 10/2022 and notes the following: .Policy: This facility will provide the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, physician orders, the comprehensive person centered-care plan, and the Resident's goals and preferences, to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure residents receiving psychotropic medications had indications for use, adequately monitored administration and comprehensively assessed need for the medication. This was discovered with 3 (R39, R58 and R32) of 5 resident medication reviews. -R39's psychotropic medication did not indicate the individualized use with non-pharmacological interventions. -R58's psychotropic medication was not comprehensively assessed to identify their individual use and non-pharmacological interventions. -R32's psychotropic medication did not have a definitive stop date and was not discontinued when ordered by the physician. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure Use of Psychotropic Medication, dated 10/10/22, was reviewed by Surveyor. The policy indicates: Residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not implement isolation measures with a resident with potential symptoms of an infection. This was observed with 1 (R39) of 1 residents observed with loose stools that were to be assessed for potential (clostridium difficile) C-Diff. R39 had noted to be experiencing recurring loose stools/diarrhea. The physician was called and ordered testing for C-Diff with an antibiotic based upon test results. R39 was not placed in contact isolation when C-Diff was suspected. Findings include: On 1/23/23 at 9:55 AM Surveyor spoke with R39 in their room. R39 did not have any indications they were on any isolation for infection. R39 indicated the facility just had Covid here and there are just germs everywhere. R39 indicated they caught something with loose stools. Surveyor reviewed R39's medical record. The Progress Notes indicate the following: - 1/22/2023 at 21:56 (9:56 PM) R39 complained of loose stools, per R39 loose stool started a week ago. Writer informed on call Physician of the change in condition. Per Physician start on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 84 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Complete Care At Chestnut Hill LLCPassaic, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At HagerstownHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Harston Hall LLCFlourtown, PA 1 of 5Complete Care At Kimberly Hall NorthWindsor, CT 1 of 5Complete Care At Laplata LLCLaplata, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Milford Manor LLCWest Milford, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At Wayne Hills Rehab & Resp CenterWayne, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care at Care AgeBrookfield, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at KensingtonWaukesha, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Maple Grove LLCMadison, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Margate ParkChicago, IL 1 of 5Complete Care at the BoulevardChicago, IL 2 of 5Complete Care At Brakeley ParkPhillipsburg, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Fox HillVernon, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At Harborage LLCNorth Bergen, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Harrington CourtColchester, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At HyattsvilleHyattsville, MD 2 of 5Complete Care At Inglemoor, LLCEnglewood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Monmouth, LLCLong Branch, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Ocean Grove LLCOcean Grove, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Prospect Heights LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Regent LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Christian Home LLCWaupun, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Grande PrairiePleasant Prairie, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Heritage LLCDundalk, MD 2 of 5Complete Care at Linwood, LLCLinwood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Nazareth LLCStoughton, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Voorhees, LLCVoorhees, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Wall LLCWall, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Fair Lawn EdgePaterson, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Holiday CityToms River, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Lehigh LLCMacungie, PA 3 of 5Complete Care At Oak Ridge LLCCharleston, WV 3 of 5Complete Care At Orange ParkEast Orange, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Phillipsburg, LLCPhillipsburg, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Severna Park LLCSeverna Park, MD 3 of 5Complete Care At Shrewsbury LLCShrewsbury, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Silver Lake LLCDover, DE 3 of 5Complete Care At SpringbrookSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Complete Care at Brick LLCBrick, NJ

Showing 40 of 84; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PEACE CAPITAL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/01/2017
STEIN, SHALOMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
BAKER, AMANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/12/2025
CULP, KARENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2020
GIERAHN, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
HELLMAN, YOSEFIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
MYERS, SCOTTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/02/2020
DES CAPITAL LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
JRK INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
PC RIDGEWOOD PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
PEACE CAPITAL HOLDINGS II LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
SMS 2021 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
WI 6 PROPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
WI 6 PROPCO TOPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
KLUGMAN, JACOBIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
STERNBUCH, DANIELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 9%Other / private 25%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$339per resident / day
operating cost
$10,316per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$372per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525608. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next