Centennial Post Acute
9100 Centennial Drive, Anchorage, AK 99504 · For profit - Corporation · 102 certified beds · (907) 333-8100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (83) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $232,502 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-24)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.5% | 16.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.8% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.1% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.7% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.8% | 19.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.3% | 14.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.9% | 96.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.8% | 6.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.0% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.7% | 18.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 0.5% | 1.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.2% | 85.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.5% | 15.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.3% | 11.0% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.85 | 1.00 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.22 | 1.36 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 256 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 68.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 144 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.6%CMS range 42.5–55.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 7.1–12.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 68.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 68.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 3.5–8.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 99.8 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.47 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.79 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.66 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.26 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
83 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 65 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure provision of necessary care and services for one resident (#1) out of 20 sampled residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:1) monitor and evaluate the resident's response to the IV fluid bolus ordered on [DATE];2) educate and inform the resident of the risks and benefits after he/she declined vital sign measurements while in a life threatening condition;3) notify the attending provider of the resident's refusal of care, sustained hypotension and continued altered mental status; and4) ensure the resident was transferred to the emergency room for a higher level of care. These failed practices prevented Resident #1 from receiving care and services necessary to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and placed the resident at risk for serious harm and death due to unaddressed changes in condition. The resident passed away on [DATE]. A determination was made that the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-12-24 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were discharged in a manner that protected health, safety, and psychosocial well-being, as required. The facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for 2 residents (#'s 112 and 113) out of 2 residents reviewed for discharge, resulting in an unsafe and inappropriate discharges.Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Identify and address each resident's post-discharge care needs;2. Ensure required services, referrals, and equipment were arranged prior to discharge;3. Assess and confirm caregiver availability, capacity, and training;4. Involve resident representatives in discharge planning and decision-making;5. Incorporate PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review - (a federally mandated pre-admission screening to ensure individuals placed in a long-term care facility had appropriate services) Level II findings and required specialized services;6. Reassess and resolve changes in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-12-24 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to comply with PASRR Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review - requirements by not incorporating the PASRR Level II determination into the resident's assessment, care planning, and discharge planning for 1 Resident (#113), out of one resident reviewed for PASRR documentation. The PASRR Level II evaluation identified the need for continued nursing facility services and required specialized mental health services. The facility did not ensure the Level II report was available at admission, did not initiate specialized services during the stay, did not revise the care plan to reflect PASRR findings, and discharged the resident without addressing PASRR-identified needs or following recommended discharge options. This failure resulted in an untreated and escalating behavioral symptoms, increased psychotropic medication use, and discharge without appropriate mental health supports, constituting psychosocial harm by reasonable person concept .Findings:Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for the treatment of pressure ulcers. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a facility acquired pressure ulcer received appropriate treatment interventions, to include timely higher level of care, for 1 Resident (#110), out of 3 residents with pressure ulcers reviewed. These failed practices contributed to Resident #110 being hospitalized with sepsis and passed away from this complication Findings:Resident #110Record review on 12/14-24/25 revealed Resident #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease and type 2 diabetes. Resident #110 required routine dialysis.Resident #110 was admitted to the facility for physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), and dialysis assistance.Resident #110's dialysis was converted to hemodialysis (filtration of the blood using a machine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-01-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from deprivation of goods and services by facility staff. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an anticonvulsant medication was available and administered per physician's order for one resident (#1) out of three sampled residents. This failed practice of deprivation of goods and services resulted in Resident #1 not receiving medication causing the resident to endure multiple seizure episodes, decorticate posturing [a reflex pose that's a symptom of damage to or disruptions in brain activity. It causes your legs to become rigid and straight, while your arms flex upward and hold tensely to your chest.] with nonresponsiveness for several hours, and subsequent hospitalization. This failed practice resulted in a negative outcome that compromised the resident's ability to maintain and/or reach his/her highest practicable physical wellbeing, as a consequence of subtherapeutic levels of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to: 1) provide multiple doses of routine anticonvulsant medication to Resident #1 per physician's order, and 2) provide accurate acquiring, and receiving of medications for one resident (#1) out of three sampled residents. These failed practices resulted in: 1) untimely acquisition and administering of medication for Resident #1; 2) Resident #1 enduring multiple seizure episodes, decorticate posturing [a reflex pose that's a symptom of damage to or disruptions in brain activity. It causes your legs to become rigid and straight, while your arms flex upward and hold tensely to your chest.] with nonresponsiveness for several hours, and subsequent hospitalization; and 3) a negative outcome that compromised the resident's ability to maintain and/or reach his/her highest practicable physical wellbeing, as a consequence of subtherapeutic levels of anticonvulsant medication and caused actual harm to the resident. Findings: Record review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, observation , and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#1) out three sampled residents was free of a significant medication error. Specifically, the facility failed to provide multiple consistent doses of an anticonvulsant medication per physician's order. This failed practice resulted in: 1) a significant medication error due to the omission of administering multiple doses of anticonvulsant medication for Resident #1; 2) Resident #1 enduring multiple seizure episodes, decorticate posturing [a reflex pose that's a symptom of damage to or disruptions in brain activity. It causes your legs to become rigid and straight, while your arms flex upward and hold tensely to your chest.] with nonresponsiveness for several hours, and subsequent hospitalization; and 3) a negative outcome that compromised the resident's ability to maintain and/or reach his/her highest practicable physical wellbeing, as a consequence of subtherapeutic levels of anticonvulsant medication and caused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was followed for 1 resident (#6), for one record reviewed. Specially, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) (#12) failed to follow Resident #6's care plan for activities of daily living (ADLs) and the total number of staff needed for safe bed mobility and toileting. This failed practice resulted in a fall with serious physical injuries from the resident's bed, negatively impacting Resident #6 and potentially declining Resident's physical well-being. Findings: Record review on 6/3-5/24 revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis of one side of the body), contractures (an abnormal and usually permanent shortening of a muscle, resulting in distortion or deformity; stiffness of the joints that causes deformity and prevents full extension), muscle weakness, adult failure to thrive, and below knee amputation. Review of Resident #6's Kardex (a quick reference sheet which outlines a resident's overall care needs, derived from the resident's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable and homelike environment was provided for all residents (based on a census of 97). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) the elevator flooring was properly installed; 2) windows were functional to keep wind and cold from entering resident bedrooms; and 3) room temperature level was within 71 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 81 degrees F. These failed practices denied all residents the right to have a safe and comfortable homelike environment Findings: Elevator floorDuring random observations from 12/14-18/25, the elevator floor was observed to be composed of approximately 6-inch square sections of linoleum like material curling around the edges. Two of these sections were lifting and had been patched with sections of what appeared to be duct tape, though the sections remained uneven and were not fully adhered to the floor.During an interview on 12/18/25 at 4:11 PM, the Director of Life Safety and Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure:1) accurate grievance officer contact information was available to residents and representatives through required postings or individual notice, and2) to provide clear instructions on how to file and submit grievances, since grievance forms and admission information did not include submission instructions and the primary posted notice contained incorrect grievance officer information.These failed practices resulted in residents and resident representatives not having reliable access to the grievance process due to inaccurate grievance officer identification and unclear submission instructions, placing residents at risk for delayed reporting and resolution of concerns, creating a facility-wide system failure that limited residents' ability to access and use the grievance process Findings:During random observations from 12/14-18/25, the grievance procedure notice was observed posted throughout residents' courts. The notice indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-24 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility had failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. This failed practice placed all residents (based on a census of 97) at risk of not having an activities program directed by a qualified professional that met their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs Findings: Record review on 12/17/25 at 2:29 PM of the Activities Director (AD) appointment letter revealed the AD was hired into the director position on 9/3/25. During an interview on 12/16/25 at 1:20 PM, the AD stated she had been the AD for about a month, and she reported directly to the Human Resources Manager (HRM). The AD understood that the HRM had an AD certification but still needed to obtain her own certification once she had enough qualifying hours. During an interview on 12/17/25 at 2:33 PM, the HRM stated she held an Advanced Activity Professional board certification. During the same interview on 12/17/25 at 2:33 PM, when asked if the HRM was involved with directing the Activities program, the HRM stated: No. The HRM reported that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to meet residents' needs, (based on a census of 97) as established by the facility assessment (a mandatory, comprehensive evaluation to understand the specific resident population's needs and match them with necessary staffing, equipment, and resources to meet those needs). Specifically:The facility assessment identified minimum staffing requirements for weekends; however, actual staffing schedules showed fewer certified nursing assistants (CNAs), and licensed nurses (LNs) than defined.Residents reported dissatisfaction with care, including delays in call light response times and provision of hygiene.These deficient practices resulted in delays in care and unmet needs for residents and had the potential to negatively impact residents' health, safety, and quality of life.Findings:Review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report (a mandatory electronic staffing data submission system created by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain a system to ensure licensed nursing staff were competent and practiced within their authorized scope of practice in accordance with the State Nurse Practice Act and professional standards. This deficient practice occurred for 4 of 6 licensed nurses reviewed and placed all residents (based on a census of 97) at risk for inaccurate assessment, inappropriate care planning, and delayed identification of changes in condition FindingsRecord review of Resident Care Manager [RCM] (LVN/LPN[Licensed vocational nurse/licensed practical nurse]) dated 8/2025, revealed: The Resident Care Manager (LVN/LPN) is responsible for overseeing the care and well-being of assigned residents, ensuring that care plans are properly implemented, and that residents receive high-quality, person-centered care in accordance with state and federal regulations. The Resident Care Manager serves as a liaison between residents, families,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were prepared, stored, and labeled in accordance with professional standards and/or manufacturer instructions for food service safety for 87 residents (#1, #2, #3, #5, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #15, #17, #18, #19, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #33, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #43, #44, #45, #47, #48, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #73, #74, #75, #76, #77, #78, #79, #80, #82, #83, #84, #85, #87, #88, #89, #90, #92, #94, #95, #96, #97, #102, #103, #104, #105, #106, #107, #108, #109) out of 97 residents that received meals from the kitchen.Specifically:1) the dry storage and kitchen area contained expired food items;2) sanitizing solution used was improperly diluted and produced out-of-range results; and3) hair restraints were improperly used.These failed practices placed the residents who received meals from the kitchen,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that identified, analyzed, and corrected systemic quality deficiencies. The facility failed to use available data to identify trends, failed to prioritize high-risk issues, and failed to implement and sustain corrective actions.Specifically, the facility failed to identify and/or address ongoing patterns of deficient practice related to staffing, grievance process, clinical care, activities, medication management, therapy services, discharge planning, environmental conditions, and care planning. These issues were evident through internal reports, resident council concerns, medical record documentation, staffing data, and direct observation, yet were not recognized and/or effectively acted upon through the QAPI process.These failed practices placed all residents (based on a census of 97) at risk of receiving less than optimal care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review, revise, and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans in accordance with resident needs. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. ensure residents or resident representatives participated in and that the facility conducted and documented required quarterly interdisciplinary care plan reviews for 3 residents (Residents #1, #3, and #64) of 20 sampled residents; and2. revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect a significant change in condition for 1 closed record (Resident #99), including the addition of appropriate interventions following the onset of a seizure disorder and initiation of anticonvulsant therapy.These failed practices demonstrated a pattern of deficient care planning practices and denied residents and resident representatives the opportunity to participate in care planning, make preferences and decisions known, and receive care and interventions aligned with current medical conditions and assessed needs Findings: Care ConferenceResident #1Record review on 12/14-24/25, revealed Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an ongoing program of individualized, meaningful activities in accordance with resident assessments and care plans for 3 residents (#12, #27, and #67) of 20 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently offer activities aligned with each resident's identified interests and documented activity goals over extended periods of time, as evidenced by prolonged gaps in activity offerings and participation. This failed practice resulted in residents not being provided opportunities for socialization, engagement, and cognitive stimulation consistent with their assessed needs, placing the affected residents at risk for social isolation, decreased psychosocial well-being, and decline in quality of life Findings:Resident #12Record Review from 12/14-24/25 revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included a fracture of the left femur, and major depressive disorder (a mental disorder characterized by low moods, low self-esteem, and loss of interest in or pleasure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care was provided, based on physician orders and comprehensive person-centered care plans, for 2 residents (#23 and #27), out of 20 sampled residents. This failed practice had the potential to diminish overall health and wellbeing, placing Resident #23 at risk for unrecognized blood pressure instability related to antihypertensive therapy and Resident #27 at risk for impaired skin integrity due to failure to implement ordered offloading and pressure reduction measures Findings: Resident #23Record Review on 12/14-24/25 revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure), heart failure (condition in which the heart pumps ineffectively) and history of transient ischemic attack (stroke).Review of Resident #23's electronic health record (EHR) revealed a physician's order, dated 6/18/25: .Vital signs daily. Further review revealed an order for blood pressure medication, dated 9/12/25: .Coreg Oral Tablet 6.25 MG (Carvedilol).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 65 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services met professional standards of practice and facility policy for the accountability and documentation of controlled substances. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff consistently completed required shift to shift narcotic count documentation, as evidenced by repeated missing required signatures in narcotic tracking books over a three-month period. This failed practice resulted in incomplete controlled substance records and compromised accountability for narcotic medications, placing 50 out of 97 residents (census) at risk for medication diversion and administration errors.Findings: During an interview on 12/18/25 at 10:07 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) #3 stated that during shift change, both the incoming and outgoing nurses were required to conduct a narcotic count together. LN #3 further stated this process was documented on the Shift Audit Record, located in the narcotic tracking books and required four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a culture where residents were treated with dignity and respect for 2 residents (#'s 48 and 64), out of 20 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:1) provide Resident #48 a bed bath at a reasonable time of day;2) maintain Resident #48's dignity and privacy by leaving the catheter urine collection bag uncovered and visible in common areas; and3) maintain Resident #64's dignity and privacy by failing to cover the resident's buttocks while transporting the resident to the resident's room from the shower room through 2 separate courts on 2 separate floors.These failures subjected residents to distressing and undignified care practices and placed them at risk for emotional distress and reduced quality of life.Findings:Resident #48Record review on 12/14-24/25 revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), insomnia and neuromuscular dysfunction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC - an official notice, issued by Medicare-certified healthcare facilities to inform beneficiaries when their coverage will end, with appeal right information) was provided to and signed by the resident's legally authorized Power of Attorney (POA) for 1 Resident (#113), out of 2 discharged residents reviewed. The resident had a documented POA with authority over insurance and government benefit decisions. The facility obtained the resident's signature on the NOMNC but failed to include the POA's signature, did not document review of the notice with the POA, and did not ensure the POA was informed of appeal rights prior to discharge. This failure denied the POA the opportunity to exercise Medicare appeal rights, resulting in the loss of a protected procedural right .Findings:Resident #113Record review on 12/14-24/25 revealed Resident #113 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, without behavioral disturbance (cognitive decline affecting memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive, person-centered care plans were developed and implemented to address identified needs for 2 residents (#'s 27 and 111) out of 2 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Specifically, the facility failed to develop and implement dementia-related care plan interventions for Resident #27 and failed to develop and implement fall-risk-specific care plan interventions for Resident #111. These failed practices placed Resident #27 at risk for unmet cognitive and behavioral needs and placed Resident #111 at risk of injury Findings: Resident #27Record review on 12/14-24/25 revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance (cognitive decline of unclear cause and severity, accompanied by behavioral symptoms), and mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology.Review of Resident #27's MDS (Minimum Data Set- a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident on wander guard elopement precautions received adequate supervision for 1 Resident (#90), out of 2 residents reviewed for wander guard supervision. This failed practice contributed to the resident's ability to leave the facility in a cab, become stranded at a local store, and returned to the facility by entering a stranger's privately owned vehicle, placing him/her at risk for abuse, exploitation, and/or death .Findings:Record review on 12/14-24/25 revealed Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a displaced fracture of medial wall of left acetabulum (a fracture in the socket part of the left hip joint where the bone fragments are moved out of their normal alignment), chronic kidney disease, schizophrenia (a mental disorder that disrupts how a person thinks, feels, and behaves, causing them to lose touch with reality), and anxiety.Further review revealed Resident #90 left the faciity on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 residents (#'s 10, 68 and 88), out of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis (the process of cleansing the blood by passing it through a special machine, necessary when the kidneys are unable to filter the blood), received the services consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure measurements were taken on the appropriate extremity. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for damage to their AV (arteriovenous) fistula (connection made between an artery and vein that is used for dialysis access) Findings: Resident #10Record review from 12/14-24/25 revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM- a chronic disease characterized by high levels of sugar in the blood) with diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD- gradual loss of kidney function), dependence on renal dialysis, and end stage renal disease (ESRD- last stage of CKD).Review of Resident #10's Care Plan Report, initiated 11/18/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-24 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure continuity of rehabilitative services for 1 resident (#111) reviewed for rehabilitative services. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure physical therapy services were provided as ordered when the facility's physical therapist went on leave. This failed practice resulted in an interruption of ordered rehabilitative services and placed the resident at risk of negative impacts to their functional status and rehabilitation outcomes Findings:Record review on 12/14-24/25 revealed Resident #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included radiculopathy (compression or irritation of a spinal nerve root, leading to pain, numbness, tingling, or weakness that radiates along the path of the affected nerve), spinal stenosis (spaces within the spine narrow, placing pressure on the spinal cord or nerves and causing pain, numbness, or weakness) and lumbosacral spinal fusion (surgical procedure that joins two or more vertebrae in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical record accurately and completely reflected the resident's current clinical condition for 1 resident (#99) of 3 closed records reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to update the resident's active diagnosis list and practitioner documentation to include seizure disorder, despite hospital documentation identifying seizure disorder as the primary diagnosis and the continued administration of anticonvulsant medications for that condition following readmission.This failed practice resulted in an incomplete and inaccurate medical record, which placed the resident at risk for inconsistent clinical decision-making, ineffective care coordination, and incomplete communication among caregivers responsible for implementing and monitoring seizure-related treatment and precautions Findings:Record review from 12/14-24/25 revealed Resident #99 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Parkison's disease (movement disorder of the nervous system), unspecified atrial fibrillation (irregular, rapid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and medical supplies were properly stored and labeled. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) remove expired and/or opened medications and supplies from use and 2) maintain emergency medications under safe temperature control. These failed practices had the potential to place all residents (census of 92) at risk of receiving expired and/or compromised medications which may result in reduced efficacy or adverse reaction.Findings: .Expired/Opened Medications/Supplies An observation on 8/29/25 at 10:50 AM, of the treatment cart in the Spruce Court, revealed: -Three packs of Hypodermic Safety needles 23 G (gauge) x 1 expired 6/30/25;-One Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel 1% (NSAID), a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, expired on 7/27/25; and-One opened pack of IV [intravenous] Start Kit w/ Chloraprep App. During an interview on 8/29/25 at 1:49 PM, Infection Preventionist (IP) and Resident Care Manager (RCM) #1 confirmed the above listed expired and/or opened medication and medical supplies.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set, a federally required assessment) was accurately coded for venous ulcers for 1 resident (#5), out of 8 sampled residents. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for not receiving the necessary and/or appropriate care and services .Findings:Record review on 8/29/25, revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia (a decline in intellectual functioning, including problems with memory, reasoning and thinking), Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA - also known as stroke, is when blood flow to a part of the brain is stopped either by a blockage or the rupture of a blood vessel) with left sided hemiparesis (partial paralysis of one side of the body), obesity, chronic pain, Diabetes Mellitus type II (disorder characterized by persistent high blood sugar levels and inability to use insulin properly), and neuropathy (nerve damage). Wound Review: Record review on 8/29/25 of SNF [Skilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure provision of necessary care and services were provided in accordance with standards of practice and/or resident care plan for 2 residents (#1 and #3) out of 8 sampled residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure escalation of care and interventions that included:1) notifying the physician of a leaking gastrostomy tube (G-Tube - medical device inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach to provide nutrition, hydration, and medication) per facility's standard of practice.2) notifying the physician of acute hypotension and altered mental status per facility's standard of practice as established by policies and resident's care plan.These failed practices prevented the residents from receiving care and services necessary to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and placed the residents at risk for significant medical complications due to unaddressed changes in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to discontinue a medication order when wound care orders had changed for 1 resident (#5) out of 8 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility continued administering Santyl (prescription enzymatic debriding agent used topically to remove dead tissue from chronic skin ulcers promoting healthy wound healing) ointment after the wound care plan was revised to discontinue its use. This failed practice led to thirteen administrations of a medication that was no longer required and further placed the resident at risk for unnecessary treatment, potential adverse effects, and harm .Findings:Record review on 8/29/25, revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia (a decline in intellectual functioning, including problems with memory, reasoning and thinking), Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA - also known as stroke, is when blood flow to a part of the brain is stopped either by a blockage or the rupture of a blood vessel) with left sided hemiparesis (partial paralysis of one side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper care for invasive devices such as the gastrostomy tube (G-Tube - medical device inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach to provide nutrition, hydration, and medication) to prevent the development of infections, for one resident (#1) out of 8 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement proper techniques for troubleshooting a leaking G-Tube, including using methods such as rubber bands and soiled tape to secure the tube, failing to clean the site with sanitary technique, and not following standard precautions to manage gastric leakage and prevent contamination.This failed practice placed the resident at risk for skin breakdown and infection, which could have affected their overall health and wellbeing Findings:Resident #1Record review on 8/27-29/25, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dysphagia following other cerebrovascular disease (swallowing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of abuse allegations for two residents (#s 8 and 15) out of 20 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to report the allegations of abuse within 2 hours from the occurrence of the incident to the State Survey Agency. This failed practice placed all residents based on a census of 94 at risk for continued potential abuse. Findings: Resident #8 Record review on 6/11-13/25, revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, subluxation (misalignment) of L4/L5 lumbar and fusion (surgical procedure that joins two or more vertebra) of spine, lumbar. Record review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI), Initial Report, dated 5/6/25 at 7:30 AM, revealed, the FRI was reported to the State Agency on 5/6/25 at 11:30 AM by Resident Care Manager (RCM) #1. During an interview and concurrent record review on 6/13/25 at 10:22 AM, the Administrator (ADM) was provided Resident #8's Initial Report of allegation of abuse, dated 5/6/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 Facility Reported Incidents (FRI) for residents (#8, #9 and #15) out of 4 FRIs for allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. Specifically, the facility failed to provide evidence of the interventions identified in their investigations. This failed practice placed these residents at risk of having injuries or harm that were not adequately addressed and treated. Findings: Resident #8 Record review on 6/11-13/25, revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included: encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, subluxation (misalignment) of L4/L5 lumbar vertebra and fusion (surgical procedure that joins two or more vertebra) of spine, lumbar. Record review of the FRI, Final Report, dated 5/6/25, revealed: Interventions: . Resident was placed on Alert Charting. Skin check completed with no new injuries noted. Record review 6/11-13/25 of Resident #8's electronic medical record (EMR), no documentation of skin assessment or alert charting was noted for the interventions identified in Final…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update and revise the care plan for 1 resident (Resident #21) out of 1 resident reviewed for care plan. Specifically, the facility failed to update and revise the care plan to reflect new interventions and/or monitoring to address aggressive or escalating behaviors. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for not receiving appropriate and/or accurate care and services. Findings: Review on 6/11-13/25 revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (cognitive decline), aphasia (impaired ability to understand or express speech), and parkinsonism (a group of movement abnormalities such as tremor, stiffness, and slowed movement). During an interview on 6/12/25 at 11:00 AM, Resident #3 allegedly stated during a verbal altercation with Resident #21 on 4/25/25, he/she was struck in the face by Resident #21. Resident #3 then retreated to his/her room, called the police and reported the assault. Review of Resident #21's Nursing notes, dated 4/25/25, revealed: . Behavior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (#5) out of a census of 94, had supervised access to an unauthorized location in the facility. This failed practice had the potential to place the Resident at risk of injury due to inadequate supervision and the lack of security measures posed the possibility of hazard including the potential for elopement through unsecured exits. Findings: Record review from 6/11-13/25 revealed, Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis on one side), following cerebral infarction (stroke), lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit (impaired thinking/speech), epilepsy unspecified, not intractable without status (recurrent seizures), and depression (low mood). Record review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally required assessment), dated 5/7/25, revealed: Wheel 150 feet: once seated in wheelchair/scooter, the ability to wheel at least 150 feet in a corridor or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an incident of multiple missed doses of anticonvulsant medication that resulted in multiple seizure episodes and subsequent hospitalization for one resident (#1) out of three sampled residents was reported to the appropriate officials in accordance with State law, including the facility's Administrator and the State Survey Agency, within timeframes specified by the 42 CFR 483.12(c)(1). Specifically, the facility failed to notify the facility's Administrator and the State Survey Agency immediately, but not later than 2 hours, or not later than 24 hours of the incident. This failed practice had the potential to cause future harm to the resident and a delay of necessary actions. Findings: Record review on 1/21-22/25, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (partial paralysis of one side of the body), anoxic brain damage (lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an incident of multiple missed anticonvulsant medications that resulted to multiple seizure episodes and subsequent hospitalization for one resident (#1) out of three sampled residents was thoroughly investigated and the results were reported to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days as specified by the 42 CFR 483.12(c). Specifically, the facility failed to investigate neglectful deprivation of goods and services by facility staff and report results within 5 working days of the incident to the facility's Administrator or his/her designated representative and the State Survey Agency. Additionally, staff interviews, and record reviews and subsequently corrective actions had not been completed. The failure to timely report and fully investigate Resident #1's hospitalization and unavailability of medications, and report to the State Survey Agency, placed the resident at risk for further potential harm or neglect. Findings: Record review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication and/or medical supplies in two medication storage rooms (the main medication storage room and in [NAME] Court), out of five medication storage rooms, and two medication carts (located on the Birch Court and [NAME] Court), out of three medication carts, were unexpired. Specifically, the facility failed to discard expired medications and/or medical supplies. These failed practices placed all residents (based on census of 99) at risk for adverse effects or complications from receiving expired medications and/or medical supplies. Findings: Main Medication Storage Room An observation on 12/10/24 at 8:28 AM, of the facility's main medication storage room revealed the following medications and/or medical supplies on the open shelves were expired: - 4 - 100ml (milliliter) 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection USP (US Pharmacopeia is a nonprofit organization that sets quality standards for medications to ensure quality and safety),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) food was stored under proper sanitation and food handling practices in the main kitchen; 2) the kitchen was kept in a clean, sanitary condition. These failed practices had the potential of causing or spreading foodborne illness to all residents, based on a census of 99. Findings: Main Kitchen An observation, during the initial main kitchen tour, on 12/8/24 at 8:20 AM, revealed: 1) Main Kitchen Freezer Unit: - 1 clear plastic bag of chicken nuggets - 3/4 full - not sealed, no label, no date. - 1 clear plastic bag of sausage patties in cardboard box - 3/4 full - not sealed, open to the elements. - Food tray with six small bowls of individual cake-like desserts, covered with clear plastic wrap - No labels, no dates. 2) Main Kitchen Refrigerator Unit: - Metal tray containing sliced fruit - loosely wrapped in clear plastic wrap, leaving some portions of fruit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure electrical equipment was maintained in safe operating conditions. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) All patient care related electrical equipment (PCREE) had regular, routine preventative maintenance (PM) inspections to ensure they were in safe operating condition; 2) All non-patient care related electrical equipment (N-PCREE) was inspected to ensure it was safe for operation in resident care areas and used in a safe manner; and 3) Space heaters used in non-resident care areas were inspected by maintenance and used in a safe manner. These failed practices placed all residents, based on a census of 99, at risk for: 1) receiving inadequate treatment and/or care, from equipment not subjected to routine preventive maintenance monitoring, that could affect the resident's overall physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; 2) electrical shock and/or exposure to electrical fire. Findings: PCREE An observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#41), out of one resident reviewed for dialysis (the process of cleansing the blood by passing it through a special machine, necessary when the kidneys are unable to filter the blood), received the services consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) blood pressure measurements were taken on the appropriate extremity; 2) medications used to treat blood pressure were administered according to the medical provider's orders; and 3) documented assessments were completed before and after dialysis treatments. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for: 1) damage to the right AV (arteriovenous) fistula (connection made between an artery and vein that is used for dialysis access), 2) increased risk of blood clot formation, 3) worsening hypertensive chronic kidney disease (condition that occurs when chronic high blood pressure damages the kidney), 4) worsening ESRD (end stage renal disease) symptoms. Findings: Record review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure two residents out of 22 sampled residents, and one resident out of 6 unsampled residents were provided care in a manner that promoted dignity and respect. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) provide covering of the urinary catheter bags (a tube inserted through the urinary tract into the bladder, connected to a drainage bag) for 2 residents (#1 and #96); and 2) provide unsampled resident #40 a dignified dining experience. This failed practice placed the residents at risk of poor self-esteem and/or self-worth and a potential for poor quality of life. Findings: Resident #1 Record review on 12/8-12/24 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, urinary tract infection, unspecified dementia and recurrent major depressive disorder (a mood disorder characterized by depressed mood and loss of interest and/or pleasure in activities). An observation on 12/11/24 at 11:35 AM, revealed that Resident #1 was being wheeled by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure self-administration of medication evaluation was completed for three residents (#s 14, 83, and 87) out of three residents reviewed. This failed practice placed the residents at risk of adverse effects of the medications. Findings: Resident #14 Record review from 12/8-12/24, revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included myocardial infarction and diabetes mellitus. An observation on 12/8/24 at 10:41 AM, revealed ear drops carbamide peroxide 6.5% was on top of Resident #14's bedside table. Resident #14 stated he/she had administered it on his/her own for two days now. Review on 12/10/24 at 11:50 AM, of active physician's order for Resident #14, revealed no physician's order for ear drops Carbamide peroxide 6.5%. During an interview on 12/11/24 at 12:14 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) #1, stated there was no order in the electronic health record (EHR). Resident #83 Record review from 12/8-12/24, revealed Resident #83 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment was maintained in resident rooms for 3 unsampled residents (#s 34, 47, and 251), out of 6 unsampled residents reviewed. This failed practice denied the residents a functional, maintained, and homelike environment. Findings: Resident #34 An observation on 12/11/24 at 3:40 PM, Resident #34's room, on Birch Court, revealed six large cardboard boxes in the resident's bathroom. Further observation revealed one box was designated for the Birch Court's artificial Christmas tree's display in the common area, and the other five boxes were stored decorations for Birch Court's Halloween and Christmas holidays. During an interview on 12/11/24 at 3:40 PM, the Director of Business Development (DBD) stated the boxes should not have been stored in the resident's bathroom. Resident #47 An observation on 12/11/24 at 12:46 PM, of Resident #47's room, revealed the face plate to the cable outlet was cracked. The DBD acknowledged these findings upon discovery. Resident #251 An observation on 12/11/24 at 4:04 PM, of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set - a federally required assessment for long term care residents) accurately represented two residents (#37 and #97) out of 22 sampled residents. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for inadequate care planning and services to achieve their highest practicable and functional well-being. Findings: Resident #37 Record review from 12/8-12/24 revealed Resident #37 was admitted with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus and multiple myeloma (bone marrow cancer). Review of Resident #37's MDS Quarterly review assessment, dated 11/16/24, revealed: Section O .K1.Hospice care .b. While a resident. was checked indicating the resident was on hospice. During an interview on 12/12/24 at 1:30 PM, Nurse Practitioner (NP) #1, Licensed Nurse (LN) #2 and LN#5, when asked if Resident #37 was currently on hospice services, stated Resident #37 was no longer on hospice services. Further record review included a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, interview, and observation and the facility failed to implement care plans for two residents (#41 and #43) based on a sample of 22 residents. These failed practices placed residents at risk for not receiving the necessary and/or appropriate care and services for optimal outcomes. Findings: Resident #41 Record review on 12/8-12/24 revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included end stage renal disease (a condition where the kidney reaches advanced state of loss of function. This causes changes in urination, fatigue, swelling of feet, high blood pressure, and loss of appetite). The resident also had a right arm AV (arteriovenous) fistula (a connection made between an artery and vein that is used for dialysis access). Record review of Resident #41's blood pressure readings between the dates of 12/13/23 - 12/17/24, revealed staff measured the blood pressure on the right arm 140 times. Review of Resident #41's care plan, revised on 4/24/23, revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to revise care plans to reflect the current level of care and services for two residents (#1 and #18) based on a sample of 22 residents. This failed practice placed residents at risk for not receiving the necessary and/or appropriate care and services for optimal outcomes. Findings: Resident #1 Record review from 12/8-12/24 revealed Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Chronic Kidney Disease (non-insulin-dependent diabetes with kidney complications), and Urinary Tract Infection (infection in any part of the urinary system, which includes the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra). An observation on 12/8/24 at 3:30 PM, revealed Resident #1 lying in bed with a foley catheter (a tube inserted through the urinary tract into the bladder, connected to a drainage bag), with the bag secured to the left side of the bed. Record review of the care plan, last reviewed on 10/18/24, revealed no care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to communicate effectively with one resident (Resident #12) out of 22 sampled residents. This failed practice had the potential to negatively impact the resident's quality of life and overall activities of daily living (ADL's) due to communication barriers. Findings: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for diagnoses that included intraspinal abscess (pus-filled infection in the spinal canal that can compress the spinal cord or nerves), osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease), incomplete paraplegia (partial damage to the spinal cord causing impaired function of the lower half of the body while retaining some degree of movement or sensory perception), and dementia (a decline in intellectual functioning, including problems with memory, reasoning and thinking). During an interview on 12/9/24 at 8:30 AM, with Resident #12, using the facility's interpreting service, the resident stated he/she like to read the bible and only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide an ongoing resident-centered activity program for one resident (#43) out of 22 sampled residents. This failed practice placed the resident at risk of boredom, loneliness, and decreased quality of life and enjoyment. Findings: Resident #43 Record review on 12/8-12/24 revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of primary lateral sclerosis (motor neuron disorder), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (severe oxygen shortage), moderate protein- calorie malnutrition (insufficient nutrition intake), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), cellulitis (skin infection) of left toe, retention of urine, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (bladder control loss). Record review of the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - A Federally required nursing assessment) dated 9/13/24, revealed, in the communication section: makes self-understood: rarely/never understands .ability to understand others: rarely/never understands.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: 1) complete a quarterly smoking assessment for one resident (#19) out of one resident who smoked marijuana. Specifically, the facility failed to complete quarterly or annual smoking safety evaluations for Resident #19 since 7/19/23; and 2) maintain accessibility to a crash cart, for immediate use during a life-saving emergency for one resident unit (Spruce Court), out of 6 units reviewed. These failed practices: 1) had the potential for the facility to be unaware of a change in status with regards to the resident's safety while smoking, placing the resident and others at risk of burns and/or fire; and 2) placed all residents of the Spruce Court, based on a census of 16, at risk of potential delay of life-saving measures during an emergency. Findings: Smoking Assessments Resident #19 Record Review on 12/8-12/24 revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included concussion (temporary brain injury) of unspecified duration and quadriplegia (complete paralysis of the body from the neck down).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the drug regimen for one resident (#25), out of 22 sampled residents, was free from unnecessary medication. Specifically, the facility failed to prevent duplicate drug therapy was prescribed. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for potential adverse effects from unnecessary medication administration. Findings: Record review on 12/8-12/24, revealed Resident #25 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation services for diagnoses that include heart failure (inability of the heart to maintain adequate blood circulation), type II diabetes (non-insulin dependent diabetes), and Parkinson's disease (degenerative disorder characterized by tremor and impaired muscular coordination). Record review of Resident #25's Pharmacy Notes and Alert Notes, dated 11/17/2024 revealed the following: 1. Patient has two SGLT [Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors] [a class of drugs that lower blood sugar levels by promoting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide nutritious food substitutions to accommodate the preferences for one unsampled resident (#40) out of a census of 90 residents who received meals from the kitchen. This failed practice had the potential to decrease nutrition and cause unnecessary weight loss. Findings: Record review on 12/11/24 revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included acquired absence of other specified parts of digestive tract, vascular dementia (dementia resulting from impaired blood flow to the brain), with psychotic disturbance, adult failure to thrive (weight loss of more than 5%, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and physical inactivity, often associated with dehydration, depression, immune dysfunction and low cholesterol), and schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized by symptoms of hallucinations, delusions and cognitive challenges). During observations of the Cedar Court dining area on 12/11/24 from 11:35 AM to 12:30 PM, Resident #40 sat in a recliner chair in the dining area.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately completed in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for one resident (#43) out of 22 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure activities staff accurately documented groups, one-on-one (1:1) and self-directed/independent activities as indicated in Resident #43's chart. This failed practice had the potential to affect the achievement of the resident's plan of care. Findings: Resident #43 Record review on 12/8-12/24 revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of primary lateral sclerosis (motor neuron disorder), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (severe oxygen shortage), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (insufficient nutrition intake), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), cellulitis (skin infection) of the left toe, retention of urine, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (bladder control loss). Record review of the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - A Federally required nursing assessment) dated 9/13/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-05 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — widespreadEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff were provided appropriate competencies and skills sets to assure residents who express suicidal ideation (thoughts and/or plans to commit suicide) were safe. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) provide training for knowledge of how to accurately perform a one-on-one observation; and 2) how to accurately document one-on-one observations for standard accountability. This failed practice placed all residents (based on a census of 96) at risk for improper or inconsistent one-on-one observation which could lead to self-harm, suicide attempt, or completed suicide. Findings: Record review on 6/3-5/24 revealed the facility had no policy, procedure, or protocol for when a resident expressed suicidal ideation, to include initiation of one-on-one observations for safety. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 9:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility had no policy, procedure, or protocol established for suicidal ideation, to include one-on-one observations. When asked what kind of training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a sufficient system in place for the accurate reconciliation of all controlled medications. This failed practice led to the diversion of controlled medications for approximately a year, without detection. Findings: Medication Dispensing and Administration An observation on 6/3-5/24, of the facility's medication storage process, revealed there were six units, or Courts, in the facility. Each Court had a secured mobile medication cart (accessible by a key, kept in the Court nurse's possession). In each of these medications cart there were two large drawers for medication storage, and in each of these drawers was an additional, fixed, locked box to store controlled medications. In addition, each floor had a Pyxis storage system for additional medication storage. Further observation revealed each resident's medication was usually dispensed monthly, from the pharmacy, in a large bubble pack card, with clear bubbled compartments to segregate each dose of medication (each medication had its own…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-05 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's administration failed to ensure training, competency, and documentation pertaining to behavioral health care was provided effectively and efficiently to ensure the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents. This failed practice placed all residents (based on a census of 96) at risk for receiving less than optimal care in a safe environment. Findings: During an interview on 6/4/24 at approximately 3:00 PM, the facility's administrator informed the survey team that she was leaving the facility and verbalized the Director of Nursing (DON) would be assuming the responsibility for the remaining survey. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 9:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility had no policy, procedure, or protocol established for suicidal ideation. When asked what kind of training direct care staff got for one-on-one training, the DON further stated, there is no official one to one training for staff. When asked if there was any kind of tool that could be available to staff to use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespreadSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete, accurate, and reflected all services provided, for 2 residents (#s 3 and 14), out of two records reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) document established one-on-one interventions in the medical record, that were initiated for safety measures due to suicidal ideation (thoughts and/or plans to commit suicide); and 2) document the exact date and time a Physical Therapy evaluation and also document that this evaluation was completed by telehealth appointment. These failed practices: 1) placed all residents (based on a census of 96) at risk of insufficient or inconsistent one-on-one observations, which could have contributed to risk of self-harm, suicide attempt, or completed suicide; and 2) placed all residents (based on a census of 96), who have the potential to receive telehealth Physical Therapy appointments, at risk for incomplete and/or inaccurate medical records. Findings: Resident #3 Record review on 6/3-5/24 revealed Resident #3 was admitted at the facility with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-05 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespreadProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure training for one-on-one observation (a close and consistent observation, in line of sight, of a resident who is an imminent risk of harming self or others) was provided to direct care staff. This failed practice placed all residents (based on a census of 96) at risk for improper or inconsistent observation which could lead to self-harm, harm to others, suicide attempt, or completed suicide. Findings: Record review on 6/3-5/24 revealed the facility had no policy, procedure, or protocol for when a resident expressed suicidal ideation, to include initiation of one-on-one observations for safety. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 9:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility had no policy, procedure, or protocol established for suicidal ideation, to include one-on-one observations. When asked what kind of training direct care staff got for one-on-one observations, the DON further stated, there is no official one to one training for staff. When asked if there was any kind of tool that could be available to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to present a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and SNF Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN) prior to the ending of Medicare Part A coverage for 1 resident (#16) and/or their legal representative, out of 6 records reviewed. This failed practice, to meet its obligation to inform the beneficiary of his or her potential financial liability, placed the resident denied the resident the timely opportunity to appeal and placed the resident at risk for financial hardship. Findings: Record review on 6/3-5/24 revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility with a primary insurance of Medicare part A and B, and a secondary insurance of Aetna, Alaska Care Retiree. Review of Resident #16's VERIFICATION OF FUNDING FOR REHAB SERVICES - PRESTIGE, dated 1/30/24, revealed: Medicare A funding source was checked. Review of Resident #16's Physical Therapy Treatment Encounter Note (s), dated 4/24/24 at 9:50 AM, revealed: .facility notified [him/her] yesterday that [he/she] would need to pay out of pocket, or DC [discharge]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a post-discharge plan of care was established for 1 Resident (#9), out of one discharge reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) required follow up wound care services were properly arranged; and 2) an adequate supply of discharge medications was provided until the resident was established for medication management post discharge. These failed practices resulted in the resident not receiving needed daily wound care for four days and placed the resident at risk of running out of necessary medications which could have affected the resident's health and wellbeing. Findings: Record review on 6/3-5/24 revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cellulitis (an acute inflammation of the connective tissue of the skin) of the right lower limb, lymphedema (swelling, most often in arms or legs, caused by a lymphatic system blockage), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a lung disease that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-16 · tag F0800 — widespreadProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure satisfying, palatable meal choices were offered and individual resident's food preferences were honored for 9 residents (#'s 16, 44, 52, 53, 62, 75, 83, 84, and 86), out of 21 sampled residents. These failed practices denied the residents, who received meals from the facility's nutrition services, of their preferences and choices and placed the residents at risk for minimal food intake which could result in weight loss and/or poor health outcomes. Findings: Resident #16 During an interview on 10/9/23 at 12:11 PM, Resident #16 stated he/she did not like the food and ordered out a lot. The resident further stated when he/she received his/her meal, it was served cold. Resident #44 During an interview on 10/8/23 at 11:40 AM, Resident #44 stated he/she liked hamburgers, and they were not available when he/she requested them. Resident #52 During an interview on 10/9/23 at 8:35 AM, Resident #52 stated when he/she ordered grilled cheese, the sandwich was only cooked on one side. The resident stated the other side was just…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to make reasonable efforts to develop a menu based on resident requests and resident groups. The failure to obtain input had the potential to place 9 residents (#'s 16, 44, 52, 53, 62, 75, 83, 84, and 86), out of a sample of 21, at risk for loss of appetite, lower meal consumption, and a potential for decreased nutritional intake and/or weight loss. Findings: Resident #16 During an interview on 10/9/23 at 12:11 PM, Resident #16 stated he/she did not like the food and ordered out a lot. The resident further stated when he/she received his/her meal, it was served cold. Resident #44 During an interview on 10/8/23 at 11:40 AM, Resident #44 stated he/she liked hamburgers, and they were not available when he/she requested them. Resident #52 During an interview on 10/9/23 at 8:35 AM, Resident #52 stated when he/she ordered grilled cheese, the sandwich was only cooked on one side. The resident stated the other side was just bread, meaning the other side of the bread was not toasted. The resident stated that he/she made efforts to write…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to involve residents with menu planning, including alternative menu choices, for 3 residents (#'s 52, 83, and 84), out of 21 sampled residents. These failed practices denied these residents, who received food from the facility's kitchen, the opportunity to make choices that would improve their appetite and food satisfaction. Findings: Resident #52 During an interview on 10/16/23 at 10:27 AM, Resident #52 stated he/she used to attend the Food Committee meetings regularly. The last meeting, he/she remembered attending was about a year ago. Resident #52 stated it had been a long time since the Food Committee meeting was on the activity calendar and did not think they held it anymore. Recently it was brought up in residents council that early trays (trays scheduled to be delivered at 4:30 PM) were sporadically delivered late for the past 3 weeks. Resident #52 stated occasionally supper was not served until around 6:00 PM, which made mealtimes run over to the night shift. This had caused issues since night shift was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-16 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: 1) residents and/or their representatives received a written notice of transfer that contained the reason, place, and address of transfer for 1 resident (#19), out of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization; and 2) ensure a copy of the residents' discharge notices were sent to the Office of the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents, based on a census of 99, by: 1) denying residents the added protection from being inappropriately discharged ; 2) providing the residents with access to an advocate who can inform them of their options and rights; and 3) ensuring the Office of the State LTC Ombudsman was aware of facility practices and activities related to transfers and discharges. Findings: Resident #19 Record review from 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23 revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic inflammatory lung disease which causes obstructed airflow from the lungs).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication and medical supplies in one medication storage room, out of 4 medication storage rooms, and one medication cart, out of 3 medication carts, were properly labeled and stored. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) discard expired medication and medical supplies; and 2) ensure the medication refrigerator temperature was within proper temperature controls. These failed practices placed all residents (based on census of 99) at risk of: 1) receiving expired medication and/or supplies; and 2) experiencing potential adverse reactions from medications not stored at proper temperatures. Findings: Medication Storage Room Expired Medication and/or Supplies: An observation on 10/11/23 at 9:35 AM, of the facility's main Medication Storage room, revealed an emergency kit that contained 1 box of Naloxone Hydrochloride [an emergency medication to reverse the effects of an opioid overdose] INJ. USP 1 mg/ml with an expiration date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure food served from the kitchen was palatable and at acceptable temperatures for service 7 residents (#'s 16, 52, 53, 62, 75, 83, and 86), out of 21 sampled residents. This failed practice placed all resident at risk of poor appetite and decreased nutritional intake and/or weight loss. Findings: Resident #16 During an interview on 10/9/23 at 12:11 PM, Resident #16 stated he/she did not like the food and ordered out a lot. The resident further stated when he/she received his/her meal, it was served cold. Resident #52 During an interview on 10/9/23 at 8:35 AM, Resident #52 stated when he/she ordered grilled cheese, the sandwich was only cooked on one side. The resident stated the other side was just bread. Resident #52 further stated he/she mentioned this to the Director of Dining Services, but the sandwiches were still being served that way. Resident #53 During an interview on 10/8/23 at 2:30 PM, Resident #53 stated his/her food arrived cold. The resident described how the soup had arrived cold with cracks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food and prepare meals under proper sanitary conditions for residents, (based on census of 96), who received food from the kitchen. This failed practice placed residents at risk for foodborne illnesses and communicable disease. Findings: Food Storage: An observation and concurrent interview on 10/8/23 at 10:46 AM, of the far-left main kitchen refrigerator revealed: 1 - 16 oz container of Sysco Imperial Lobster Base, opened, no date. 1 - 32 oz container of Grove Lemon Juice, opened, no date. The Director of Dietary Services (DDS) stated that these items should have been dated when opened. The DDS immediately threw away the container of lobster base. An observation on 10/8/23 at 10:57 AM, of the downstairs walk-in refrigerator, revealed a large bag of chicken thighs thawing in a steam tray pan above another large bag of chicken thighs thawing on a baking sheet. The bag of chicken thighs in the steam tray pan were noted to fill the steam tray pan entirely, with a small portion of the bag containing the chicken hanging…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control protocols were performed for 13 residents (#'s 12, 19, 30, 31, 45, 48, 59, 68, 75, 81, 85, 90, and 298), out of 99 (census) residents. This failed practice had the potential to increase the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. Findings: Hand hygiene before dining During an observation of the meal service on 10/8/23 at 12:19 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #11 delivered a meal tray to Resident #'s 12, 48 and 90. Upon delivery to each room, the CNA did not offer hand hygiene, nor ask the residents if hand hygiene was performed prior to his/her entrance. At 12:30 PM, CNA #11 delivered a meal tray to Resident #19. Resident #19 was not offered hand hygiene, nor asked if hand hygiene had already been performed. The CNA placed the meal tray on the bedside table, put on gloves and emptied Resident #19's urinal. CNA #11 then removed his/her gloves and served the resident his/her meal tray without first performing hand hygiene. CNA #12 then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 residents (#36 and #81), out of 24 residents observed for dining, were treated in a dignified manner that respected individuality and their care needs. This failed practice placed the residents at risk of feelings of poor self-esteem and/or self-worth and a potential for poor quality of life. Findings: Resident #36 Record review on 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23 of the Electronic Health Record (EHR), revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and cerebrovascular accident (stroke). Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally required nursing assessment for long-term care residents) assessment, dated 9/14/23, revealed Resident #36 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS-used to determine resident's cognitive status) of 00, which means severe cognitive impairment was present. An observation on 10/8/23 at 12:05 PM, revealed Resident #36 in his/her room, in bed, wearing a brief with fecal material that had leaked out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable and clean homelike environment. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) keep personal clothing items safe from loss for 1 resident (#71); and 2) keep the bathroom environment clean and sanitary for 2 residents (#'s 71 and 90), for 1 out of 6 survey days. These failed practices had the potential to cause a diminished self -worth and a reduced sense of well-being. Findings: Missing clothing: Record review from 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23 revealed Resident #71 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included dementia. During an interview on 10/9/23 at 9:17 AM, when asked if he/she had any property go missing, Resident #71 stated some of his/her clothes went missing, and his/her family member was going to speak to the Director of Nursing (DON). During an interview on 10/9/23 at 12:39 PM, Resident #71's Family Member (FM) reported several clothing outfits went missing adding up to about $400. The FM stated he/she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document, investigate, and resolve a grievance for 1 resident (#84), out of 21 sampled residents. This failed practice violated this resident's right to have a grievance investigated and addressed. Findings: Review on 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23 revealed Resident #84 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included infection and inflammatory reaction due to other cardiac and vascular devices, implants and grafts, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. During an interview on 10/10/23 at 4:00 PM, Resident #84 stated he/she had two grievances that had not been resolved with the Social Services representative: 1) there was a grievance that the billing department had contacted the Resident's Emergency Contact #2 and discussed his/her private financial matters during a recent hospitalization; and 2) there was a grievance that his/her prosthetics and a wheelchair needed to be ordered. Review of the facility's Grievance Manual, included compiled residents'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set- a federally required assessment for long term care residents) assessment accurately represented residents' status for 3 residents (#'s 38, 83 and 96), out of 21 sampled residents and 4 closed records. This failed practice created a risk for inadequate care planning and inaccurate goals to improve the resident's functional abilities. Findings: Resident #38 Record review on 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23 revealed Resident #38 was admitted with a diagnosis that included incomplete paraplegia (partial paralysis of the lower half of the body including both legs, usually caused by damage to the spinal cord). Review of Resident #38's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed: Section P0100A .Restraints .A. Bed Rail .1 .Used Less than daily . During random observations from 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23 of Resident #38, revealed no bedrails were utilized, and Resident #38 was in his/her wheelchair with full use of his/her upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address all risk factors to meet 1 resident's (#83) psychosocial needs, out of 21 sampled residents. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for not receiving the necessary and/or appropriate care and services. Findings: Record review from 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23 revealed Resident #83 was admitted with diagnoses that included, surgical amputation of the right and left fingers and toes, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension (high blood pressure), insomnia, and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). During an interview on 10/9/23 at 1:39 PM, Resident #83 stated he/she had Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) related to a traumatic childhood event involving his/her parents as well as from the Vietnam War. Resident #83 further stated that hearing conversations in foreign languages was a trigger and had experienced this several times with staff conversing loudly outside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was updated for 1 resident (#71), out of 21 sampled residents. Specifically, interventions to increase the resident's desire to attend activities he/she enjoyed were not included in the resident's care plan. This failed practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for not receiving necessary services to improve or maintain his/her quality of life. Findings: Record review from 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23 revealed Resident #71 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia and depression. During an interview on 10/9/23 at 12:35 PM, Resident #71's power of attorney (POA) stated the resident enjoyed musical activities. The POA further stated for the longest time, the facility did not assist the resident to the music activities. The POA stated with Resident #71's dementia, there were certain approaches that were helpful to increase the resident's desire to attend. The POA stated finally the Activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene were provided to 2 residents (#'s 16 and 149), out of 21 sampled residents. Specifically, the residents had not been offered or given showers. This failed practice denied the residents from maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident #16: Record review from 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23 revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included CVA (cerebrovascular accident-stroke) with hemiparesis (partial weakness or paralysis on one side of the body). Further review revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an observation and interview on 10/9/23 at 11:48 AM, Resident #16 was observed with unkempt hair. Resident #16 stated few staff members knew how to help him/her with his/her hair, and the staff who usually assisted him/her was on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure needed care and services were provided to 1 resident (#53), out of 21 sampled residents. Specifically, the resident's dressing changes were not provided according to the physician's orders. The failure to provide ordered dressing changes placed the resident at risk for infection and decreased wound healing. Findings: Record review from 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23 revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Lymphedema (abnormal buildup of protein-rich fluid in any part of the body resulting from a malfunction in the lymphatic system) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic inflammatory lung disease which causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). During an interview on 10/8/23 at 2:09 PM, Resident #53 stated he/she required dressing changes on his/her legs that were being done once a day, then every other day. The Resident stated every other day was okay, except the License Nurse (LN) had gotten too busy and pushed the dressing change off for 5 days. The Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure necessary services were provided to prevent a pressure ulcer for 1 resident (#73), out of 21 sampled residents. Specifically, skin checks were not documented for the month prior to the resident developing a heel ulceration. This failed practice had the potential to delay necessary treatments to prevent further damage to the resident's skin. Findings: Record review from 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23 revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes and diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage that occurs from diabetes, with symptoms that include numbness or pain in the legs, feet, or hands). Further review revealed the resident had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 10/9/23 at 11:05 AM, when asked about his/her foot and heel ulcers, Resident #73 stated he/she was tall and his/her feet were touching the baseboard of the bed, which created the wounds. When asked what measures were put…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#35), out of 9 investigated complaints/facility reported incidents, received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents during resident's care. This failed practice resulted in physical injury to the resident and hospitalization. Findings: Record review on 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23 of the electronic health record (EHR), revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included down syndrome (a genetic disorder associated with physical growth delays), cerebral infarction (stroke), and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body). Review of the facility reported incident Initial Report, dated 9/5/23, Resident #35 fell from the bed during resident care which resulted in a fracture to the resident's left femur. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally required nursing assessment for long-term care residents) assessment, dated 6/14/23, revealed in Section G- Functional status A. Bed Mobility, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-16 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to include a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) diagnosis for 1 resident's (#83) medical record and develop a trauma-informed care plan, out of 21 sampled residents. This failed practice had the potential to exacerbate or trigger ongoing psychosocial difficulty and affect the resident's ability to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Record review from 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23 revealed Resident #83 was admitted with diagnoses that included, surgical amputation of the right and left fingers and toes, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension (high blood pressure), insomnia, and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). During an interview on 10/09/23 at 1:39 PM, Resident #83 stated he/she had PTSD related to a traumatic childhood event involving his/her parents as well as from the Vietnam War. Resident #83 further stated that hearing conversations in foreign languages was a trigger and had experienced this several times with staff conversing loudly outside of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-16 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an annual performance review was completed for 1 Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) (#1), out of 2 CNA files reviewed. This failed practice failed to monitor the CNA's performance or provide potentially needed feedback/education for any possible sub-optimal care rendered to residents (based on a census of 99). Findings: Personnel record review on 10/12/23 at 10:40 AM, revealed CNA #1 was hired on 4/23/20. Review of CNA #1's file revealed the last annual evaluation completed was 10/20/21. During an interview on 10/12/23 at 10:40 AM, Assistant Administrator (AA) stated that a new Staff Development (SD) employee was recently hired to update the staffing process and these types of concerns would be addressed. The AA further stated, We are running behind and recognized that was needed so [SD] was hired. It took us a while to hire the right person. Review of the Anchorage Team Member Handbook, undated, revealed: . The performance evaluation process is designed to provide a dialogue between the supervisor and the team member…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure 2 residents (#3 and 81), out of 9 complaints/facility reported incidents investigated, were free from significant medication errors. Specifically, the residents received incorrect medications. This failed practice resulted in hospitalization for one resident and placed another resident at risk for adverse reactions. Findings: Resident #3 Record review on 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23, revealed Resident #3 was admitted with a diagnosis that included type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the facility reported incident (FRI) Initial Report, dated 9/25/23, revealed Resident #3 was administered 35 units of Lispro (short acting insulin), instead of 35 units of Lantus (long-acting insulin) by Licensed Nurse (LN) #1. LN #1 recognized the medication error immediately and gave the resident 150 ml of orange juice and breakfast. Physician #1 was called immediately to the bedside, the following orders were given; hold all medications for the rest of the day, perform blood sugar checks every 15 minutes, and give PRN (as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-16 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served according to the resident's therapeutic dietary order for 1 Resident (#298), out of 21 sampled residents. This failed practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for adverse medical complications. Findings: Record review on 10/8-12/23 and 10/16/23 revealed Resident #298 was admitted with diagnoses that included pleural effusion (fluid build up around the lungs), fractures of the left and right femurs, and fracture of the left tibia. During an interview on 10/9/23 at 3:02 PM, Resident #298 stated, There was no way my breakfast was low sodium. I should be on a low sodium diet. The resident further stated that he/she needed to watch his/her sodium intake to keep the swelling in his/her legs down and fluid around his/her lungs from accumulating. Review of Resident #298's Diet Order and Communication form, dated 10/6/23, revealed an active diet order: regular texture, heart healthy type, small portion, thin liquids per Diet Order and communication Form. Review of Resident #298's meal tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-24 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure their facility assessment (a mandatory, comprehensive evaluation to understand the specific resident population's needs and match them with necessary staffing, equipment, and resources to meet those needs) was up to date and accurate. This failed practice had the potential to place all residents (based on a census of 97) at risk of not receiving services that enable them to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being .Findings:Record review on 12/14-24/25 revealed the facility provided Centennial Post Acute Facility Assessment, was last updated on 11/25/25.Review of the facility's Facility Assessment, dated 11/25/25 revealed: . Persons (names/titles) involved in the process and completing assessment. The list, labeled: Nursing Home Leadership and Management, included individual names who were no longer employed at the facility or did not currently hold the listed position during the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$232,502 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $155,753 — penalty dated 2025-12-24
- $37,898 — penalty dated 2025-06-16
- $38,851 — penalty dated 2024-12-12
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-01 for 4 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRUIST BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 08/01/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/10/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| PETTIETTE, LUKE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2024 |
| ROSE, TAMMY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| TIEVA, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| NEXT SADDLE REALTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in AK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Alaska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner. The starred figure is the national median (no state figure published).
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 025025. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.