Marion Valley Post Acute
400 Barks Road West, Marion, OH 43302 · For profit - Corporation · 135 certified beds · (740) 387-1225 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.1% | 5.3% | 15.4% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.1% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 38.8% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.0% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.6% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.4% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.2% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.1% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 74.3% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.7% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.8% | 12.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.25 | 1.73 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.04 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 216 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 38.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.6%CMS range 51.8–65.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 8.2–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 38.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 5.0–10.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 106.5 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, dishwasher temp logs, manufacturer recommendations, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher temp was high enough for sanitation. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 113.Findings include:Observation on 04/20/26 at 9:31 A.M. of the dishwasher revealed the tag on front of dishwasher minimum temperature of wash cycle was 159 degrees Fahrenheit (F), pump rinse of 160 degrees F, and final rinse of 180 degrees F with 20 psi pressure. Observation of the dishwasher not running revealed a wash temp of 160 degrees, rinse pump 170 degrees F, and final rinse of 178 degrees F. Observation of the dishwasher running revealed the was temp gauge moved to 162 degrees F, the rinse pump gauge did not move at all, and the final rinse gauge did not move at all. The dishwasher did not kick on for the pump rinse or the final rinse and pushed the tray out the end of the conveyor belt. Observation times two trays coming through the dishwasher where the rinses did not kick on for each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure code status forms were in the medical record. This affected one (#116) of three residents reviewed for code status. The facility census was 113.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Former Resident (FR #116) revealed an admission date of 11/12/26 and discharge date of 01/09/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to sepsis due to enterococcus, acute and subacute infective endocarditis, bacteremia, urinary tract infection, and acute pulmonary edema.Review of the care plan dated 11/12/25 revealed FR #116 had an advanced directive of Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA). Interventions included but not limited to code status will be in the medical record at all times.Review of physician order revealed code status DNRCCA from 11/12/25 through 01/09/26.Review of scanned documents in the electronic record (PCC) revealed no advanced directive DNRCCA was scanned into PCC upon admission through discharge.Review of eInteract hospital transfer form dated 01/09/26 revealed code status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency as required. This affected one (#84) resident out of three residents reviewed for incidents/accidents. The facility census was 113. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 11/22/24 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and unspecified hemiplegia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/27/26, revealed Resident #84 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, bed mobility, transfers, and bathing. Review of nurse's notes for Resident #84 revealed a note dated 08/04/25 at 11:49 A.M. which stated the nurse went into Resident #84's room due to resident being on the floor. The note stated Resident #84 was observed lying on her bedroom floor with her back to the floor and head against the bedside stand. The note indicated Resident #84's family, Certified Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin. This affected one (#84) resident of the three residents reviewed for incidents/accidents. The facility census was 113. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 11/22/24 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and unspecified hemiplegia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/27/26, revealed Resident #84 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, bed mobility, transfers, and bathing. Review of nurse's notes for Resident #84 revealed a note dated 08/04/25 at 11:49 A.M. which stated the nurse went into Resident #84's room due to resident being on the floor. The note stated Resident #84 was observed lying on her bedroom floor with her back to the floor and head against the bedside stand. The note indicated Resident #84's family, Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan included all skin issues. This affected one (#68) of four residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 113.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 03/14/26 with diagnoses including but not limited to pressure ulcer of left heel stage two (partial thickness skin loss involving the epidermis and dermis) and pressure ulcer of right heel stage three (full thickness skin injury characterized by a deep crater like wound that exposes fatty tissue).Review of current physician orders revealed wound care for pressure to right heel: cleanse with normal saline (NS), pat dry, apply betadine wet to dry sterile dressing, cover with ABD and wrap with kerlix (apply betadine only to wound area) daily and as needed. Apply antibiotic cream and Band-Aid to left heel daily, offload right foot at all times while in bed, and wear heelless shoe to right foot while ambulating.Review of care plan dated 03/14/26 revealed the resident was at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive skin evaluations were completed upon admission for Resident #35 and failed to ensure wound care was completed as per physician orders for Resident #117. This affected two (#35 and #117) residents out of the three residents reviewed for skin breakdown. The facility census was 113.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 03/13/26 with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident #35's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/15/26, indicated Resident #35 was cognitively intact and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene and transfers, required partial/moderate staff assistance with eating, and supervision with bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide care/services to prevent a fall. This affected one (#84) resident out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 113.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 11/22/24 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and unspecified hemiplegia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/27/26, revealed Resident #84 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, bed mobility, transfers, and bathing. Review of the physician orders for Resident #84 revealed an order dated 01/14/25 for pressure reduction mattress to bed.Review of nurse's notes for Resident #84 revealed a note dated 08/04/25 at 11:49 A.M. which stated the nurse went into Resident #84's room due to resident being on the floor. The note stated Resident #84 was observed lying on her bedroom floor with her back to the floor and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-01 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) sign in sheets, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director attended QAPI meetings quarterly, as required. This had the potential to affect all 80 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the facility QAPI sign in sheets revealed the facility held monthly meetings on 02/11/25, 03/31/25, 04/24/25, 05/30/25, and 06/26/25. Further review revealed the facility's Medical Director was not present for any of the QAPI meetings during this time. Interview on 07/01/25 at 2:19 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the Medical Director did not attend QAPI meetings quarterly. Review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee, undated, revealed the following individuals would serve on the committee: Administrator, DON, Medical Director, dietary representative, pharmacy representative, social services representative, activities representative, environmental representative,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the Medscapes (online resource for healthcare professionals) indications for medication use, the facility failed to ensure residents were not ordered psychotropic medications without an appropriate indication for use and further failed to ensure residents were monitored for the use of psychotropic medications. This affected three (#43, #71, and #76) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/16/24 with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder, and insomnia. Review of Resident #43's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 04/17/24 revealed Resident #43 required use of psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled, dated, and stored in a manner to ensure food safety. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility, except for one (#9) resident identified as receiving no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen walk-in refrigerator on 06/29/25 at 8:15 A.M. revealed a package of waffles that were open and undated, a container of Danishes that were opened, undated and unsealed, an undated 32 ounce (oz) jug of opened salsa, twenty-two open-to-air uncovered dishes of peaches and cobbler desserts in tulip bowls, two uncovered thickened yellow liquid in 8 ounce cups, an opened and undated 4.5 pound cheesecake delight tub, three 16 oz chicken bases that were opened and undated, a half of a cake that was unlabeled and undated in a gallon sized plastic bag, an unlabeled and undated pitcher of dark purple liquid, a 64 oz half-full opened garlic parmesan sauce with no use-by date, a 160 oz barbecue sauce that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-01 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of Binding Arbitration Agreements, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to understand and comprehend the terms of a Binding Arbitration Agreement before entering into one. This affected five (#27, #31, #60, #64, and #84) of six residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 05/14/25 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/21/25, revealed Resident #27 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the Binding Arbitration Agreement, signed 05/14/25, revealed Resident #27 signed the document herself. Interview on 06/30/25 at 8:01 A.M. with Resident #27 revealed the resident stated that an arbitration agreement was when two people got together and argued a point and come to a solution. Resident #27 stated she did not think she would sign an arbitration agreement with the facility. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered or provided the COVID-19 vaccination. This affected four residents (#28, #33, #47, #50) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/06/19, with diagnoses including chronic heart failure, anxiety disorder, dementia, depression, cardiac arrhythmia, and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed no evidence she had been offered a COVID-19 booster since 2023. Interview on 07/01/25 at 10:48 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #506 verified that there was no evidence the COVID-19 vaccine had been offered to Resident #47 since 2023. 2. Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/11/20, with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory failure, depression, heart failure, and major depressive disorder.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain resident dignity by ensuring catheter collection bags were covered in common areas. This affected two (#45 and #70) of three residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 09/04/22 with diagnoses including muscle wasting, obstructive and reflux uropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms and retention of urine. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/08/25, revealed Resident #70 was cognitively intact, had an indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Review of the care plan, dated 11/07/23, revealed Resident #70 was at risk for infection and/or trauma related to the use of a supra-pubic catheter for obstructive uropathy. Interventions include administer medications per physician order, catheter care every shift, change suprapubic catheter on the 19th of the month, check catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed to address resident care needs. This affected one (#53) of six residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 07/31/24 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, infection and inflammatory reaction to internal right knee prosthesis. Review of the current physician orders revealed Resident #53 was ordered doxycycline (antibiotic) 100 milligrams (mg) twice daily for prophylactic related to total right knee infection per orthopedic surgeon. Review of current care plan revealed no care plan for antibiotic use or infection. Interview on 06/30/25 at 11:04 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #53 did not have a care plan for antibiotic use or infection. Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, revealed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that included measurable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, review of bathing documentation and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received timely and adequate staff assistance with personal hygiene. This affected one (#32) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #32 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, abnormalities of gait and mobility, dysphagia, and overactive bladder. Review of the care plan, dated 11/20/23, revealed Resident #32 had an ADL self-care and mobility performance deficit related to generalized weakness, dizziness, post-cerebrovascular accident (stroke), diabetes, and obesity. Interventions included the use of a Hoyer lift, two-person (staff) assistance with toileting and bed mobility, and staff assistance with daily hygiene, grooming, and oral care. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, medical record review, and review of activities documentation, the facility failed to ensure activities were offered to all residents. This affected one (#342) of one resident reviewed for activities. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #342 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/29/25, revealed Resident #342 had intact cognitive status. The MDS indicated the resident identified that it was somewhat important for her to listen to music that she liked, keeping up with the news, being around pets, going outside when the weather was good and participating in religious practices. Review of Resident #342's activity assessment, dated 06/27/25, revealed that she preferred in-room activities. Interview with Resident #342 on 06/29/25 at 9:45 A.M. revealed that she was not included in activities, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 07/31/24 with diagnosis including, but not limited to, obstructive sleep apnea (difficulty breathing when sleeping). Review of current physician orders revealed an order dated 02/19/25 to schedule a sleep study for Resident #53. Further review of Resident #53's medical record revealed no evidence a sleep study was scheduled or completed. Review of a nursing progress note dated 06/09/25 revealed the Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) called into the facility to give a new order for a sleep study. Per the resident, they used a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) at home and did not bring it to the facility due to it being broken. Interview on 06/29/25 at 10:22 A.M. with Resident #53 revealed that he was supposed to have a sleep study done but it had not happened. Interview on 06/30/25 at 11:04 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed she would look into the status of the sleep study for Resident #53. A follow-up interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed routinely. This affected two (#50 and #78) of three residents reviewed for oxygen. In addition, the failed to monitor and document as needed oxygen use. This affected one (#32) of three residents reviewed for oxygen. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 03/11/20 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia and hypoxia (trouble breathing), obstructive sleep apnea (difficulty breathing while sleeping), and morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation (weight obstructs breathing deeply). Review of the current physician orders revealed Resident #50 received oxygen at two liters per minute (lpm) via nasal cannula (NC) continuously. Observation on 06/29/25 at 10:17 A.M. of Resident #50's oxygen tubing revealed the tubing was dated 03/02/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, medical record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure parameters were in place for pain medication administration and ensure non-pharmacological interventions were implemented and descriptions of pain were documented with administration of pain medication. This affected one resident (#48) of two residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/28/24 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, cognitive communication deficit, unspecified dementia, and metabolic encephalopathy Review of Resident #48's plan of care dated 09/09/24 revealed the resident was at risk for pain related to decreased mobility with neuropathy, restless leg syndrome, and history of migraine headaches. Interventions included acknowledging the presence of pain and discomfort, administering pain medication as ordered, assessing for pain, encouraging non-medicinal interventions, evaluating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis evaluations were completed. This affected one (#15) of one resident identified as receiving dialysis. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 08/11/17 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #15's current physician orders revealed to complete a post-dialysis evaluation, complete a pre-dialysis evaluation and send with the resident, and dialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Review of Resident #15's dialysis evaluations for May 2025 and June 2025 revealed no pre or post dialysis evaluations were completed on 05/23/25, 05/30/25, 06/02/25, 06/04/25, 06/13/25, and 06/16/25. Further review of the dialysis communication revealed no post-dialysis evaluations were completed on 06/09/25 and 06/27/25. Interview on 06/30/25 at 11:54 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by the physician as required. This affected one (#4) of one resident reviewed for physician visits. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 07/19/24 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, zoster encephalitis, dysphagia, and metabolic encephalopathy. Review of the physician visit notes revealed the resident was seen by the physician on 07/22/24, 01/30/25, and 02/13/25. The resident was seen by the Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) on 07/19/24, 07/24/24, 07/31/24, 08/08/24, 08/28/24, 09/19/24, 09/24/24, 10/10/24, 10/28/24, 11/11/24, 11/13/24, 11/26/24, 02/26/25, 03/26/25, and 06/30/25. Interview on 07/01/25 at 7:43 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the physician only completed visits with Resident #4 on 07/22/24, 01/30/25, and 02/13/25. The DON confirmed the physician did not see the resident at least every 30 days for the first 90 days following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medications were administered per physician order. This affected one (#75) of one resident reviewed for medication monitoring. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/07/25 with diagnoses including type one diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, and unspecified dementia, and disorientation. Review of Resident #75's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #75's plan of care dated 01/08/25 revealed the resident was at risk for impaired cardiac function and complications related to diagnoses, history of a pacemaker, and aortic valve replacement in 2020. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, cardiology consultation, diet as ordered, notifying the physician of signs of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of pharmacy recommendations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician addressed pharmacy recommendations timely. This affected one (#76) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of Resident #76's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/20/24 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, dementia without psychosis, chronic kidney disease stage four, peripheral vascular disease, anxiety, depression, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #76's pharmacy recommendation form dated 10/23/24 revealed a gradual dose reduction of buspirone (anti-anxiety medication) was recommended. Further review revealed no evidence the physician addressed the recommendation. Review of Resident #76's pharmacy recommendation form dated 11/26/24 revealed it was recommended the physician review the resident's order for loratadine (allergy medication) as there were two orders for the medication, one for 10 milligrams (mg) every other day and one as needed. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of urine culture results, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure urinary tract infections (UTIs) were treated appropriately. This affected one (#70) of two residents reviewed for UTIs. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 09/04/2022, with diagnoses including muscle wasting, obstructive and reflux uropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, and urinary retention. Review of the care plan dated 11/07/23 revealed Resident #70 was at risk for infection and/or trauma related to the use of a suprapubic catheter. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, performing catheter care every shift, changing the suprapubic catheter on the 19th of each month, checking catheter patency and tubing every shift, and providing catheter care per facility policy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the crash carts were inspected routinely. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents the facility identified to have a Full Code status. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the crash cart sign off sheet revealed staff to check every shift to verify the lock code is the same as the shift prior. If the code needs to be changed because the cart was accessed, use the provided inventory sheet to confirm all items have been replaced. Apply a new lock and document the code on the sheet. The subsequent shift should then verify the lock number is the same as the shift prior (new lock applied, if indicated). Observation on 05/12/25 at 2:17 P.M. of crash cart in the nurse's station on 400/500/600 hall revealed the Automated External Defibrillator (AED) was in the bottom drawer. Review of the Crash cart sign off for the 400/500/600 hall revealed the lock was verified by one nurse 03/01/25 through 03/11/25 and the lock was changed on 03/11/25. The sign off was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place. This affected one (#71) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 02/26/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to senile degeneration of brain, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, unsteadiness on feet, and disorientation. Review of minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of care plan for falls revealed the following interventions non-skid material under cushion and on top of wheelchair cushion and non-skid strips to the closet side of the bed. Observation on 05/12/25 at 2:05 P.M. of Resident #71 revealed no non-skid strips to the closet side of the bed or any non-skid material in Broda chair. Interview on 05/12/25 with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #368) verified no non-skid strips to the closet side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents who receive food and beverages from the kitchen in the facility. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Interview on 11/21/2024 at 2:17 P.M. with Resident #38's family member revealed his other family member was allowed to go into the kitchen to get ice and they stated the kitchen was very unsanitary. Observation on 11/26/2024 at 11:16 A.M. revealed a ceiling tile behind the tray line was water damaged, cracked, and bowing outwardly toward the floor. Interview on 11/26/2024 at 11:16 A.M. with Dietary Aide #72 confirmed the ceiling tile was water damaged, cracked and bowing. Dietary Aide #72 revealed the ceiling tile did leak sometimes when it rained. Interview on 11/26/2024 at 11:18 A.M. with Dietary Director #1 revealed that the ceiling did leak, but he had not seen it actively leak. Review of the policy titled Environment dated September 2017 revealed the Dining Services Director would ensure that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during lunch meal service. This had the potential to affect 113 residents who ate food served from the kitchen. The facility identified two (#21 and #107) residents who received no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 115. Findings include: Observations on 05/30/24 from 11:40 A.M. to 12:20 P.M. revealed [NAME] #309 donned clean gloves at 11:42 A.M., without completing any hand hygiene prior to donning the gloves. [NAME] #309 started the lunch meal service. At approximately 11:45 A.M., [NAME] #309 used his gloved hands to touch the spaghetti noodles that were hanging down off the plate to put them on the plate properly. At 11:48 A.M. and 11:50 A.M., [NAME] #309 adjusted his pants and pulled up his sweater sleeves with the same gloves on. At 11:50 A.M., [NAME] #309 was observed touching the inside of the plate prior to placing food items on it with the same gloved hands. [NAME] #310 was also observed opening the steamer by grabbing the handle with gloved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident personal needs accounts (PNA) reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Medicaid residents were provided notification to spend down when their account was reaching the Medicaid Resource Limit. This affected one (#65) out of five residents accounts reviewed. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of Resident #65's PNA account revealed the resident was a Medicaid recipient. Further review of Resident #65's PNA account identified on 09/19/22 the balance is $4,011.68. The records identified Resident #65's balance has exceeded the $2,000 Medicaid Resource Limit since at least April 8, 2021. There was no evidence Resident #65 or the residents representative were provided with a notice to spend down. Interview with Business Office Manager (BOM) #756 on 09/22/22 at 8:34 A.M. revealed the facility could no locate any policy or procedure that identified when notifications to spend down should occur and what to do if there is a lack of response. BOM #756 confirmed she is fairly new to the position and was instructed to send the letters out with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with timely incontinent care. This affected two (#24 and #25) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease, weakness, heart failure, transient cerebral ischemic attack, and type two diabetes. Review of Resident 24's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident is cognitively intact, had no behaviors and required extensive assist for toileting and personal hygiene. Resident was coded as frequently incontinent of bladder and occasionally incontinent of bowel. Review of Resident #24's at risk related to urinary incontinence care plan revealed intervention to provide incontinent care as needed. Interview with Resident #24 on 09/19/22 at 2:24 P.M. revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement as needed laxatives when a resident was experiencing constipation. This affected one (#73) out of six residents reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of Resident #73 medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, other symptoms and signs involving the musculoskeletal system, heart failure, cognitive communication deficit, dementia, repeated falls, hypertension, need for attention for personal care. Review of the Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 had cognitive impairment. Her functional status is listed as extensive two person assist for all activities of daily living. The MDS also revealed Resident #73 is frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. The MDS also revealed the Resident has no skin issues. Review of the care plan dated 08/24/22 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide the correct enteral feeding to a resident. This affected one (#90) out of one resident reviewed for enteral feeding. The total facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of Resident #90's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but are not limited to sepsis, hyperlipidemia, vitamin D deficiency, hemiplegia, acute pyelonephritis and acute kidney infection. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had cognitive impairment, no behaviors, required extensive assist with eating, had enteral feeding and was on a nutritional program for pressure ulcer care. Review of Resident #90's care plan dated 08/24/22 revealed altered nutritional nutritional status as related to diagnosis cerebrovascular accident, nothing by mouth and dependent upon enteral feed to meet nutrient needs. Care plan included enteral feeding related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff interview the facility failed to provide therapeutic diets as ordered. This affected three (#53, #67, and #13) out of three residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that include Alzheimer's disease, weakness, and depression. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident is cognitively impaired had no behaviors required a mechanically altered diet and had no mouth pain, no broken or loosely fitting full or partial denture. Review of Resident #53's orders revealed the resident was ordered a regular diet with mechanical soft texture on 08/31/22. Observation of the lunch meal in the main dining room on 09/19/22 at 12:09 A.M. revealed Resident #53 received her meal in the main dining room. Observation of meal tray pass on 09/19/22 at 12:50 P.M. revealed Resident #53…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview of facility staff, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store and label food in an appropriate manner. This had the potential to affect all 115 residents residing in the facility. Findings include 1. Observation on 09/23/19 at 8:30 A.M. revealed boxes sitting on the floor of the pantry. The boxes showed wet marks and the floor around the boxes was wet. The boxes were not labeled with the date received by the facility. Interview on 09/23/19 at 8:30 A.M. with Dietary Aide (DA) #331 revealed the boxes had been received on 09/21/19 as frozen juices. The boxes were kept in the pantry so the juices would start to thaw. The boxes would then be placed into the refrigerator after thawing for several days. Observation on 09/23/19 at 8:40 A.M. revealed the juice boxes were labeled with the date received of 09/21/19 and placed into refrigerator. Interview on 09/23/19 at 10:20 A.M. with Food Service Director (FSD) #332 verified the boxes were stored on the pantry floor and were not labeled with the date received by the facility. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-09-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of manufacturer recommendations and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff administered the proper dose of insulin, which results in a significant medication error. This affected one (Resident #57) of five residents observed for medication pass. This had the potential to affect 20 residents who received insulin via the Kwik Pen. The facility census was 115. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 07/24/19. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician's order for Resident #57 revealed an order for Insulin Lispro 100 unit per milliliter to inject subcutaneous as per sliding scale to be given before meals and at bedtime. Observation of medication pass with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #300 on 09/24/19 at 11:33 A.M. revealed she was giving insulin to Resident #57. She pulled out the Insulin Lispro Kwik Pen units 100 cleaned the end with alcohol pad, then placed the new insulin needle on the end. She dialed up two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff were properly securing medication carts when left unattended. This had the potential to affect five cognitively impaired residents who reside on the 300-hall. The facility census was 115. Findings include: Observation of the medication cart on 300-hall on 09/24/19 at 7:40 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #310 walked away from the unlocked medication cart at this time. At 7: 43 A.M., the RN walked back to the cart and immediately walked away to behind the nurse's desk to the medication room. RN #310 walked back to the medication cart at 7:48 A.M. and verified the medication cart was left unlocked and stated she had a rough night. Observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #320 on 09/24/19 at 8:24 A.M. revealed the LPN went to the medication cart and unlocked it. He left the unlocked medication cart and went into room [ROOM NUMBER]. Interview with LPN #310 on 09/24/19 at 8:26 A.M. verified he had walked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-09-26 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, review of facility's admission packet and record review, the facility failed to issue a bed hold notification letter to a resident. This affected one (Resident #115) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 115. Findings include: Record review for Resident #115 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation services. Review of the nursing progress note, dated 07/22/19, revealed the resident was crying in room because of hip pain and requested to be sent to the emergency room. The resident was transferred to the hospital at 4:25 P.M. on 07/22/19 and admitted to the hospital for hip pain and hypokalemia. On 09/25/19 at 2:04 P.M., an interview with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing revealed the resident did not receive a bed hold notification letter because Medicaid was not her payor source. On 09/26/19 at 12:28 P.M., interview with the Business Office Manager #330 revealed they did not give Resident #115 a bed hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/01/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| KELLOGG, SHANNON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| 400 BARKS ROAD WEST OH OWNER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| SNF OH HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELL INTEGRA MASTER JV LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELL PM HOLDCO JV LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELLTOWER, INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| IDREES, GHULAM | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $424K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366304. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.