Anchor Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 379 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 137 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen's floor and equipment including two ovens, the shelves on two metal rolling carts, three stove top spill pans, three metal racks, one reach in freezer, five food preparation pans, and large manual can opener and its base attachment were kept clean. These failures had the potential to create an environment for food-borne illnesses which could affect 102 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen. Review of the facility's policy titled, Sanitation revised on 04/2006 indicated, Policy Statement-The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. All kitchen, kitchen areas, and dining areas shall be kept clean, free from litter and rubbish . 2. All utensils, counters, shelves, and equipment shall be kept clean .1. Observation during the initial kitchen inspection on 09/09/25 from 9:15 AM to 9:55 AM, with the Registered Dietitian (RD) present, revealed the floor behind the kitchen's ovens was unclean…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of 24 (Residents (R)1) reviewed for comprehensive care plans failed to include the care required for R1's nephrostomy tube. care plan directing measurable goals and interventions for one of a total sample of 29 residents. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, and the inability to meet their maximum practicable level of functioning.Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team dated March 2022 included, .the Comprehensive, person-centered care plans are based on resident assessments and developed by an interdisciplinary team (lDT).Review of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) in the Clinical Census found under the Clinical Census tab revealed admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of nephrostomy tube since 2022 due to hydronephrosis (extra fluid in the kidney) and acute kidney injury with tubular necrosis (dead tissue in the kidney).Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance received services for one of four residents (Resident (R) R63) reviewed for fingernail care and bathing in a total sample of 24 residents. This failure placed residents at risk for diminished self-worth, self-esteem, feelings of embarrassment, and/or medical issueReview of the facility's policy titled Fingernails/Toenails, Care of dated 2002 documented, .Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular cleaning. Proper nail care can aid in the prevention of skin problems around the nail bed.Review of R63's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Admissions tab documented R63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, and adult failure to thrive.Review of R63's Care Plan located in the EMR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of three residents (Resident (R)15 and R63) reviewed for respiratory care in a sample of 24 residents received oxygen as ordered by the physician and R15s oxygen unit was clean and sanitary. This failed practice has the potential to cause respiratory issues and /or infections for residents.Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration dated October 2001 documented, .Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure.Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered.1. Review of R63's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Admissions tab documented R63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Review of R63's Physician Orders located in the EMR under the Orders tab dated 06/03/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have medications available for administration for one (Resident (R) 57) of seven sampled residents whose drug regime was reviewed in a total sample of 24 residents. The facility failed to have R57's Clonazepam medication (Generic name- Klonopin which is an antianxiety medicine) available to administer as prescribed for two days, which caused the resident to not feel well and have increased anxiety.Review of R57's admission Record revealed R57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of which included bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder.Review of R57's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/16/25, located in the EMR under the MDS tab, indicated R57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated R57 had an active diagnosis of anxiety disorder and received an antianxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, test tray observation, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and hot to four of four residents (Resident (R) 4, R35, R57, and R80) reviewed for food palatability out of a total sample of 24 residents. This failure had the potential to affect 102 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen and could result in residents skipping meals and experiencing weight loss.Review of the facility's policy titled Food and Nutrition Services dated 10/17 indicated, Policy Statement Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident . 7. Food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident, the food appears palatable and attractive, and it is served at a safe and appetizing temperature .1. Review of R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/04/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interview, and review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, the facility nursing staff failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing direct care for one of one (Resident (R)1) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in the sample of 24 residents. This could place this resident and other residents and staff at risk of infection by cross-contamination.Observation on 09/09/25 at 10:30 AM of R1 lying in bed revealed a small black bag hanging on the side of her bed. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)3 at this time confirmed that R1 has a nephrostomy tube.Observations on 09/09/25 at 10:30 AM, 09/10/25 at 2:00 PM, and 09/11/25 at 10:00 AM, and 3:00 PM revealed CNA3 entered R1's room to provide direct care without wearing any PPE.Review of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Clinical Census under the Clinical Census tab revealed admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of nephrostomy tube since 2022 due to hydronephrosis (extra fluid in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure storage of medications and biologicals in 2 of 2 medications observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications last revised November 2023, states, The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Furthermore it states, Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals are locked when not in use. Unlocked medication carts are not left unattended. Observation on 09/03/24 at 2:01 PM and 2:30 PM of Hall 400 Medication Carts, revealed, an unattended and unlocked medication cart with 1 bottle of Clear Lax sitting on the top of the cart. Observation and interview on 09/03/24 at 3:16 PM of Hall 400 Medication Carts, revealed, an unattended and unlocked medication cart with 1 bottle of Clear Lax sitting on the top of the cart and one medicine cup with a mixture of applesauce and pills. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine remained clean and not contaminated, ensure proper hand hygiene when serving food from the steam table, ensure proper handwashing when going from a dirty to a clean area, and ensure staff (Cook1) wore a beard guard for one of one kitchen. These failures had the potential to affect 105 residents in the facility who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, ''Ice,'' revised 09/17, revealed, ''Ice will be prepared and distributed in a safe and sanitary manner .4. Ice bins will be cleaned monthly and as needed .Staff will adhere to proper utensil usage or clean gloved hands for handling.'' Review of facility policy titled, ''Food: Preparation,'' revised 09/17, revealed, ''All foods are prepared in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code. 1. All staff will practice proper hand washing techniques and glove use .4. The Dining Services Director/Cook(s) will be responsible for food preparation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, observations, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable as expressed by five of five residents (Resident (R) 26, R27, R52, R53, and R55) in a group interview, in that the hot foods when served to the residents did not taste hot and the food was not seasoned. This had the potential to affect 105 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, ''Food: Quality and Palatability,'' revised 02/23, revealed, ''Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. Food will be palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature .1. The Dining Services Director and Cook(s) are responsible for food preparation .4. The cook(s) prepare food in accordance with the recipes, and season for region and/or ethnic preferences, as appropriate. Cook(s) use proper cooking techniques to ensure color and flavor retention.'' During the resident group meeting that was held on 07/01/24 at 4:30 PM, five residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,428 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,428 — penalty dated 2024-07-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $487K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC