Karcher Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 84 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 55.0 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-11-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #50) whose incidents during transferring were reviewed. This failure resulted in actual harm when Resident #50 was injured during a transfer from her bed to a wheelchair against her will. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) State Operations Manual (SOM), Appendix PP, dated 7/23/25, defined abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Willful as defined in the definition of abuse means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm.Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including dementia, history of stroke, history of fractures, and age-related osteoporosis (a bone disease that causes bones to become weak, fragile,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the Long Term Care State Reporting Portal, Incident and Accident (I&A) report, record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide an environment free from accidental hazards over which the facility has control and provides supervision to each resident to prevent avoidable accidents. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for accidents. Resident #36 was harmed when a CNA failed to notify the nurse Resident #36 was using a heating pad. Resident #36 was found to have a burn at the hospital. Findings include: Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including surgical amputation of the left leg above the knee, diabetes, kidney disease, depression, anxiety, chronic pain symptom, and hypertensive heart disease without heart failure.An annual MDS Assessment, dated 7/16/25, documented Resident #36 was cognitively intact.Resident #36's medications included, but was not limited to:- Duloxetine (an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-04-04 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews of residents, resident representatives, and staff, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's cultural/religious rights were honored. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #28) whose record was reviewed for resident rights. This failure resulted in psychosocial harm to Resident #28 when a certified nursing assistant (CNA) cut her hair without her consent. Findings include: Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for care following a stroke and had multiple diagnoses including chronic kidney disease and dementia. A facility incident report, dated 2/12/25, documented staff were pulling Resident #28's hair while brushing it, then cut her hair. The report documented CNA #1 stated Resident #28 was uncooperative with staff attempting to brush the knots out of her hair, and CNA #1 cut about an inch or inch and a half from Resident #28's hair. The report did not specify if Resident #28 was asked for her consent before CNA #1 cut her hair. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, review of the State Agency's Long Term Care Reporting Portal, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to stay in the facility and the right to appeal the decision for a facility-initiated discharge. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for facility-initiated discharges. This deficient practice caused Resident #1 to experience psychosocial harm when he was discharged to a motel without the ability to check his blood sugar and safely administer insulin. Findings include: The facility's Notice of Transfer or Discharge policy, dated 4/2020, documented the notice of transfer/discharge shall be made 30 days prior to transfer/discharge unless the health and/or safety of the resident or residents residing in this center are endangered. Appendix PP, State Operations Manual, states there may be rare situations, such as when a serious crime (e.g., attempted murder or rape) has occurred, that a facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the FDA Food Code, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 dumpsters and 1 of 1 garbage can were properly closed to prevent attracting pests and rodents into the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and staff in the facility. Findings include: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2022 Food Code, 5-501.115 (Outside Storage): Specifies that outside receptacles (like dumpsters) must be designed with tight-fitting lids, doors or covers that keep pests out and contain odors. The facility's policy titled, [NAME] Post Acute Trash and Dumpster Policy, undated, stated, all trash must be placed inside designated dumpsters. Do not leave trash on the ground. Close lids after use and do not overfill dumpsters. On 5/29/26 at 10:30 AM, three dumpsters and one outside garbage can were observed uncovered. [NAME] #1 stated, the dumpsters should be closed and the garbage can should be covered. On 5/29/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided respiratory services consistent with professional standards of practice. This was true for 5 of 16 residents (#16, #33, #37, #38, and #52) whose respiratory devices were not cleaned and stored properly and 2 of 16 residents (#22 and #38) reviewed for physician orders for oxygen therapy. This deficient practice created the potential for residents to develop infection and to receive too little or too much oxygen. Findings include: The facility's policy, titled Oxygen Administration, revised 10/2010, documented the purpose of the procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Under the section titled, Preparation, 1. documented, Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. 1. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, FDA Food Code review, resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to appropriately store, distribute and label foods. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received food prepared in the facility. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination and use of spoiled foods, and adverse health outcomes including food borne illnesses. Findings include: 1. The FDA Food Code, Section 3-501.19, titled, Time as a Public Health Control, stated, once a Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) food is removed from temperature control (the kitchen steam table or refrigeration), it must be consumed or discarded within 4 hours. Leaving a tray in a residents room for hours violates professional standards for food safety and distribution. Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as effectively as it should)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #16) reviewed for respect and dignity. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of embarrassment and diminished self-worth. Findings include: The facility's Dignity policy revised February 2021, documented staff were expected to promote dignity by helping residents to keep urinary bag covered.Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and paraplegia (the partial or complete loss of motor and sensory function in the lower half of the body typically caused by spinal cord injury or disease).On 5/26/26 at 12:45 PM and 5/27/26 at 1:16 PM, Resident #16 was observed sitting in his wheelchair outside the Assisted Dining Room with his urinary bag containing urine uncovered.On 5/26/26 at 1:18 PM, the DON who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the State Operations Manual (SOM), record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents exercised their right to formulate an Advanced Directive. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #33) whose records were reviewed. This failed practice created the potential for an adverse outcome if the resident's wishes were not followed. Findings include:The State Operation Manual (SOM), Appendix PP, defined an Advance Directive is a written instruction such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State), relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. Physician Orders for Life-sustaining Treatment (or POLST) paradigm form is a form designed to improve patient care by creating a portable medical order form that records patient's treatment wishes so that emergency personnel know what treatments the patient wants in the event…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, review of the facility grievances, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure grievances were investigated and prompt corrective action was taken to resolve them. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #6) reviewed for grievances. This failure created the potential for psychological harm if residents' grievances were not acted upon. Findings include:The facility's Grievance policy and procedure revised March 2019 documented concerns/grievances may be presented verbally or in writing. The policy also documented grievance should be completed with appropriate actions and follow-up. The Social Service Director/Designee should:-assist concerned resident(s), resident representative, other family members(s), or advocated that have issues or concerns to complete a Grievance/Concern Form. If the person with concern does not want to complete a Grievance Form, any format should be accepted.-log all concerns/grievances received onto the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, policy and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a seatbelt was assessed as potential restraints and a consent from the residents and/or their representatives was obtained. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #6) reviewed for potential restraint. This deficient practice had the potential for harm if the seatbelt were improperly used. Findings include: The facility's Use of Restraints policy revised April 2017, documented prior to placing a resident in restraints, there shall be a pre-restraining assessment and review to determine the need for restraints. The assessment shall be used to determine possible underlying causes of the problematic medical symptoms and to determine if there are less restrictive interventions that may improve the symptoms. The policy also stated restraints shall only be used upon the written order of a physician and after obtaining consent from the resident and/or representative.Resident #6 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were appropriately monitored for side effects of anti anxiety medication. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure created the potential for inappropriate pharmacological interventions and adverse outcomes, including oversedation. Findings include:Resident #9 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbances, history of falls, and anxiety.A review of Resident #9's care plan showed no documentation of monitoring for anti anxiety medication side effects, despite the resident's diagnosis of anxiety and use of anti anxiety medication.A physician order dated 3/16/26 documented: Anti anxiety medication: monitor for drowsiness, slurred speech, dizziness, nausea, aggressive/impulsive behavior.A review of Resident #9's TAR for anti anxiety side effect monitoring from 3/16/26 through 5/26/26 documented only a check mark…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the required discharge process was followed when residents were transferred to a higher level of care. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#6 and #16 ) reviewed for hospital discharge process. This failure created the potential for incomplete information of transfers, delay in care, and lack of required notifications. Findings include: 1.Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dependence on supplemental oxygen, chronic pain, and major depressive disorder. a. A nursing progress note dated 4/18/26 at 10:42 PM documented, Resident #16 was found unresponsive to verbal and physical stimulation. The LN documented Resident #6's oxygen saturation at 70% (normal 95–100%) and noted respiratory distress with snoring and gasping respirations. The LN called 911, and Resident #6 was transported to a higher level of care. A review of Resident #16's record showed no documentation that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the State Operations Manual (SOM), record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed when new mental health diagnoses were identified for 1 or 4 residents (Resident #4), whose records were reviewed for PASRR screenings. This failure created the potential for harm if the resident required but did not receive specialized services for mental health while residing in the facility. Findings include:Appendix PP of the State Operations Manual, revised 7/23/25, documented any resident with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition must be referred by the facility to the appropriate state-designated mental health or intellectual disability authority for review. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including aphasia (inability to communicate verbally), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness on one side of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$41,603 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

• $10,549 — penalty dated 2025-11-07
• $10,546 — penalty dated 2025-09-03
• $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-04-04
• $9,318 — penalty dated 2024-07-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $832K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID