Kennedy Care Center
619 N. Fairfax Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90036 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 97 certified beds · (323) 383-9897 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (110) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $38,272 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-20)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.1% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 43.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.9% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.56 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.69 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 201 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.83 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.2%CMS range 34.2–48.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.2%CMS range 6.0–11.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 32.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 90.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.9%CMS range 5.9–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.36 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 89.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
110 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 99 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide foot care consistent with professional standards to maintain skin integrity for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1.Ensure that the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI - uses a strong magnetic field and radio waves to create detailed images of the inside of the body, aiding in the diagnosis and monitoring of various conditions) recommended by the Wound Physician Specialist (WPS) to rule out (R/O) osteomyelitis (a bone infection that can occur when bacteria spread to the bone, causing pain, swelling, and potentially leading to serious complications if left untreated) on 2/12/2025 after Resident 1's left plantar foot (located on the bottom of the foot) wound has reopened. 2.Implement the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Wound Care by completing the documentation of the services provided on 2/7/2025 through 2/11/2025, 2/13/2025, 2/14/2025, 2/15/2025, 2/16/2025, 2/18/2025, and 2/19/2025 and following a professional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation involving an incident of unknown source resulting in serious bodily injury was reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH-state agency who ensures oversight of state and federal regulations to long term care facilities) immediately, but not later than two hours after becoming aware of the incident, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to report that Resident 1 eloped (unauthorized departure of a resident from an around-the-clock care setting) from the facility on on 5/5/2026 at 5:50 PM. Resident 1 remained missing overnight and was returned to the facility by two police officers on 5/6/2026 at 3:35 PM two police officers. On 5/6/2026 at 7:36 PM, Resident 1 was transferred to a general acute care hospital (GACH) where the Resident 1 was diagnosed with fractured (broken) right fifth finger of unknown origin. This deficient practice delayed notification to the state agency responsible for oversight and investigation of incidents involving potential abuse, neglect, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, three of four sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3), who were identified as at high risk for elopement (Refers to an unauthorized departure. It happens when a patient or resident leaves a hospital, clinic, or care facility without notifying the staff or before being officially discharged . This is especially critical when the patient requires supervision for their own safety) and with wandering behaviors (locomotion behavior associated with conditions like dementia or autism. It involves repetitive, aimless, or disoriented pacing, roaming, or leaving a safe area) the facility failed to: Ensure the reception/lobby area is monitored and supervised after 6 PM when the receptionist signs out/leaves for the day to prevent residents at risk for elopement from eloping the facility. Ensure the wander guards (An electronic monitoring device worn on ankle or wrist to help ensure safety by alarm activation if a resident attempts to leave a safe area) and wanderguard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff maintained current cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certification in accordance with the standards of nursing practice for one of five sampled employees, Infection Prevention Nurse (IP). This deficient practice was identified during an employee records review and had the potential to place residents at risk for delayed or ineffective response during resident emergencies including cardiac arrest and respiratory failure. Findings: During a brief facility tour and observation on [DATE] at 9:25 AM, IP nurse was observed in the hallways and resident care areas. During a review of employee records on [DATE] at 1:45 PM, five employee records were reviewed for the following items: Hire date, state licensure number and expiration date, CPR expiration date, background check, and mandatory abuse prevention trainings completion. During a review of IP nurse employee records on [DATE] at 1:45 PM, employee record indicated, IP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, and functional environment for residents, staff and visitors by failing to ensure one of two entry doors in the facility was free from mechanical and/or electrical failure and in a safe operating condition.This deficient practice resulted to the theft of Resident 1's mobile phone by an unhoused individual (HL 1) who entered the facility without staff awareness on 1/9/2026, placing all residents, staff, and visitors at risk of avoidable abuse and misappropriation of property.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), malignant neoplasm of the endocrine pancreas (a rare type of cancer that starts as a growth of cells in the pancreas), muscle weakness (weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle) and difficulty in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of four sampled residents, (Resident 1) by failing to: Ensure Resident 1 was assessed and evaluated after an incident of theft and misappropriation of property by an unhoused individual (HL 1) who gained access to the facility without consent on 1/9/2026.Ensure a complete documentation of the incident was completed and documented according to facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Charting and Documentation, and Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program.These deficient practices placed Resident 1 in delayed intervention to provide treatment and care and to ensure safety of Resident 1 and possibly all other residents, staff and visitors in the facility.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and security measures by failing to:Protect one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), from misappropriation (the unauthorized, improper, or unlawful use of funds or other property for purposes other than that for which intended) of property and personal belongings.Document and list inventory of Resident 1's personal belongings upon admission according to facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Personal Property.These deficient practices resulted in the theft of Resident 1's mobile phone by an unhoused individual (HL 1) while Resident 1 was in the facility.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), malignant neoplasm of the endocrine pancreas (a rare type of cancer that starts as a growth of cells in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy regarding reporting of theft and misappropriation of property and to submit a conclusion report of investigation within five days or in accordance with state or federal law for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the Department of Public Health to ensure the residents' allegation of theft and misappropriation of property was investigated which can also lead to a delay in prevention of further misappropriation of property and undetected type of abuse for all residents, staff and visitors in the facility. Cross Reference F602Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), malignant neoplasm of the endocrine pancreas (a rare type of cancer that starts as a growth of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician order to administer medication based on professional standards of clinical practice for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to administer the Nicotine (an addictive poisonous chemical found in tobacco) Patch (medication used to help stop smoking cigarettes)14 milligrams (mg- unit of measurement) per 24hours (14mg/24hrs) for smoking cessation. This failure had the potential to result in unmet care needs, ineffective management of smoking cessation and compromise Resident 1's health.During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 12/3/25 with diagnoses including tobacco use and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's Physician Order dated 12/5/25 at 9:15 a.m., indicated an order for Nicotine Patch 14mg./24 hours apply one patch transdermal (application of medication through the skin) one time a day for smoking cessation for six weeks and remove per schedule. During a review of the Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure over the counter medications (OTC) were labelled with the date when the containers were first opened for one of one medication cart reviewed. During observation on 12/30/25 at 9:56 a.m., one container of acetaminophen (medication for short term relief of minor aches and pain) and one container of docusate sodium liquid (DSS, medication to relieve constipation) had no date indicating when they were first opened. This deficient practice had the potential to administer the medications to residents beyond the recommended days of use after opening the container. During observation and concurrent interview on 12/30/25 at 9:56 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2), the acetaminophen and DSS containers were found in the medication cart that had no dates indicating when they were initially opened. During concurrent interview, LVN 2 stated the acetaminophen and the DSS did not have a date when it was opened. LVN 2 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement their infection control policy for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2). Resident 2, who was on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs, microorganisms resistant to most antibiotics]), the facility failed to ensure protective gown was used when Resident 2 was repositioned in bed on 12/30/25 at 8:39 a.m.This deficient practice had the potential to spread infection to other residents and staff.During a review of admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 11/13/25 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular (CVA, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) with left side weakness, reduced mobility and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 2's Care Plan initiated on 11/16/25 indicated Resident 2 required EBP during high-contact care activities due to the presence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 99 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' privacy and dignity by failing to ensure the indwelling urinary catheter (a soft hollow tube which is passed into the bladder to drain urine, for persons who cannot empty their bladder in the usual way) drainage bag was always covered for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 1's sense of self-worth and self-esteem.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, it indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including toxic encephalopathy (a disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected by some agent or condition-such as viral infection or toxins in the blood), obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition in which the flow of urine is blocked and urine flows backward from your bladder into your kidneys) and depression (a mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' information was not sent to the personal cell phones of facility staff members. This deficient practice had the potential for unauthorized release of residents' information to the public. During an interview on 9/11/25 at 9:06 a.m., restorative nursing assistant (RNA 1, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) with specialized training in rehabilitation skills) stated she received text messages on her personal cellphone from the rehabilitation department regarding residents who would need to be on the RNA program. RNA 1 stated the text messages would include the name of the residents and their room number. During an interview on 9/11/25 at 10:18 a.m. the physical therapist (PT) stated when a resident needs to be on the RNA program, a group text message would be sent to the director of rehabilitation, the physical therapist, occupational therapist, director of staff development and the RNA. The PT stated the text messages would include the name of the residents, their room number and the specific RNA program.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents, (Resident 1) by failing to follow and implement physician's order and when Resident 1's blood pressure was elevated according to facility's policy and procedure titled, Changes in Resident's Condition or Status.This deficient practice placed Resident 1 in delayed intervention to provide treatment for urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) as required per facility's policy and procedure upon changes in condition.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, it indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including toxic encephalopathy (a disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected by some agent or condition-such as viral infection or toxins in the blood), obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff follow physician's order and facility's policy with wearing personal protective equipment (PPE-a barrier precaution which includes the use of gloves, gown, mask, face shield, when anticipating coming in contact with blood, body fluids or other communicable toxins or agents) when providing care to one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) who was on an enhanced barrier precaution (utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms) room. This deficient practice placed residents at a higher risk of acquiring and transmitting infections to other residents, staff and visitors in the facility.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, it indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract), and chronic kidney disease (CKD-a longstanding disease of the kidneys…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen for 76 of 76 residents when: Improper Storage of Fooda. Improper Storage and labeling of Food b. Prepared leftover tuna stored in the refrigerator c. Dietary staff did not follow cool down methodd. Multiple food items with expiration datese. Dietary Cooks did not follow the thawing process 2. Equipment Cleanliness/Cross-contaminationa. The stove was dirtyb. The floor in front of the stove was dirtyc. Multiple large silver pans were dirty 3. Dietary staff was competent in the thawing process for large pork roast.These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (a transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another or one object to another) that could lead to foodborne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses and other toxins) medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During the initial tour to the kitchen on 8/5/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner for six of six sample (Residents 18, 28, 49, 71, 75, and 106). This failure had the potential to cause a delay in care and services necessary for the residents. Findings: During a record review, Resident 18's admission Record indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of muscle weakness (decrease in the force your muscles can generate, making it harder to move your body) and Displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur (break in your thigh bone). During a record review, Resident 18's History and Physical (H&P) dated 7/18/25, indicated the resident was alert and cooperative. During a record review, Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 7/27/2025, indicated the resident was cognitively intact (mental ability to make decisions of daily living), and needed minimal to moderate assistance with activity of daily living (ADL-basic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-08 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing and palatable diet for five out of five sampled residents (Residents 17, 18, 28, 49, and 75). This failure had the potential to result in weight loss, functional decline, dehydration, and skin impairment for Residents 17, 18, 28, 49, and 75). Resident 17 stated not getting nourishing and palatable diet makes him angryFindings: During an interview on 8/5/25 at 9:02 A.M., Resident 49 stated the food is not palatable and the dietary department is serving chicken too often at least 4 times a week. Resident 49 stated he spoke with the facility Dietary Supervisor (DS) and expressed his concerns about the food and nothing has changed. During an interview on 8/6/2025 at 9:34 A.M., Resident 18 stated the food in the facility does not taste very good and that the food tasted unseasoned and the cooks serves chicken almost every day either for lunch or dinner. Resident 18 stated she is glad she is going home on 8/8/2025. Resident 18 stated she spoke with the DS when she was admitted and gave DS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve palatable food for seven of seven residents (Residents 7, 17, 18, 24, 28, 49, and 75) reviewed for food palatability reviewed for food palatability. This deficient practice had the potential to result in meal dissatisfaction, decrease food intake and placed residents at risk for unplanned weight loss for the residents. 1. During a record review, Resident 7’s admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 2/27/2024 and readmitted the resident on 5/17/2025 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), muscle weakness and anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells). During a record review, Resident 7’s nutritional malnutrition, initiated 2/28/2024, indicated Resident 7 was at risk for malnutrition due to diagnosis of diabetes. The care plan goal was for the resident to not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and concurrent record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed annual and upon hire Tuberculin (TB - is a serious illness that mainly affects the lungs) skin test, staff had TB skin test results on file, and annual physical examination completed for four out of seven employees (Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1 and 2, Occupational Therapist (OT - assess a person's physical, cognitive, and emotional abilities and develop treatment plans to improve their functional skills, adapting the environment or activities as needed), and Treatment Nurse). This failure had a high probability of TB transmission to residents, guests, and staff to result in the facility.Findings: During an interview and concurrent record review on 8/7/25 at 8:42 AM, seven of seven employee files were reviewed with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) and the following were noted: 1. LVN 1 was hired on 3/14/2022. There was no annual Tuberculin (TB - is a serious illness that mainly affects the lungs) skin test for the years 2023 and 2024, no background check since 2022, no annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to allow one of six sample residents (Resident 49) to retain his personal possession(s). This failure resulted in Resident 49 feeling angry because he could not call his family member(s). Findings: During a record review, Resident 49's admission record indicated Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of muscle weakness (lack of physical or muscle strength), paraplegia (a condition where a person has partial or complete paralysis or the lower half of their body, including both legs). During a record review, Resident 49's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 7/5/2025, indicated the resident was cognitively intact (the mental ability to make decisions of daily living), and required moderate to maximum assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL- activities related to personal care). During a record review, Resident 49's care plan initiated on 7/15/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews and concurrent record review the facility failed to conduct a background search for one out of seven employees (Housekeeping) prior to working in the facility: This failure had the potential to expose the residents to abuse.Findings: During an interview and concurrent record review with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 8/7/25 at 8:42 AM, Housekeeping employee file was reviewed which indicated that Housekeeping was hired in the facility on 8/22/2024. The housekeeping employee file indicated there was no background search report. DSD stated she has been employed with the facility for 2 years. DSD stated employee background checks/search are completed to ensure that the staff that are hired do not have a criminal background and to ensure the safety of the residents. During a record review, the facility document titled Facility Assessment Tool dated 3/28/2025, under staff training/education and competencies, indicated that, New hires must undergo background checks .
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and concurrent record reviews, the facility failed to implement the physician orders to administer Trazadone (medication used to treat depression) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 106). These failures resulted in Resident 106 inability to sleep and the resident feeling angry. Cross Reference F0760Findings: During a record review, Resident 106 admission record indicated Resident 106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of human immunodeficiency virus disease (a virus that weakens the body's defense system also called HIV) and essential hypertension (high blood pressure). During a record review of Resident 106's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 8/8/2025, indicated the resident was cognitively intact (mental ability to make decisions of daily living). During a record review, Resident 106's care plan initiated 8/4/2025, indicated, Resident 106 uses antidepressant medication related to depression (a serious mood disorder that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' Annual Minimum Data Set assessments (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool) was completed in accordance with the timeline set forth by the Center for Medicare Services (CMS) system for one out of 13 sampled residents (Resident 11). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed services for Resident 11. During a record review, Resident 11's admission record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 6/2/2021 and re-admitted the resident on 6/23/2023 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease , chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/7/2025 at 10:07 AM, with the Minimum Data Set Assistant (MDSA), Resident 11's most recent Annual MDS was reviewed. MDS Assessment Reference Date (ARD - the last day of the observation or look-back period for the MDS assessment) dates and submission dates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' Minimum Data Set assessments (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool) were transmitted timely to the Center for Medicare Services (CMS) system for four out of 13 sampled residents (Resident 17, Resident 40, Resident 57 and Resident 63). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed services for Resident 17, Resident 40, Resident 57 and Resident 63. During a record review, Resident 17's admission record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 12/30/2023 and re-admitted the resident on 3/31/2025 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), and kidney failure (a medical condition where the kidneys lose their ability to effectively filter waste and excess water from the blood, and maintain proper chemical balance in the body). During a record review, Resident 40's admission record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 6/2/2021 and re-admitted the resident on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' Minimum Data Set assessments (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool) were transmitted timely to the Center for Medicare Services (CMS) system for 11 out of 13 sampled residents (Resident 8, Resident 10, Resident 11, Resident 17, Resident 40, Resident 43, Resident 51, Resident 52, Resident 57, Resident 63 and Resident 104). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed services for Resident 10, Resident 11, Resident 17, Resident 40, Resident 43, Resident 51, Resident 52, Resident 57, Resident 63 and Resident 104. During a record review, Resident 8's admission record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 8/19/2023 and re-admitted the resident on 2/4/2025 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD - irreversible kidney failure) and anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells). During a record review, Resident 10's admission record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 11/8/2023 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the tube feeding (TF - a form of nutrition that is delivered into the digestive system as a liquid) was administered as ordered for one of two sampled residents (Resident 27). This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident 27 to take in an inadequate amount of calories and nutrition and weight loss. During a record review, Resident 27's admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/19/2024 with diagnoses that included protein calorie malnutrition (a condition in which a person does not consume enough protein and calories to meet their body's needs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and chronic kidney disease (progressive damage and loss of function in the kidney). During a record review, Resident 27's History and Physical, dated 10/17/2024, indicated the resident was at high risk for decompensation (the loss of the ability to cope or function normally) and readmission [to a general acute care hospital]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and concurrent record reviews, the facility failed to administer Trazadone (Medication to treat depression) per physician orders for one of one sampled resident (Resident 106)These failures resulted in Resident 106 inability to sleep and feeling angry. Cross Reference F0635Findings: During a record review, Resident 106 admission record indicated Resident 106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of human immunodeficiency virus disease (a virus that weakens the body's defense system also called HIV) and essential hypertension (high blood pressure). During a record review of Resident 106's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 8/8/2025, indicated the resident was cognitively intact (mental ability to make decisions of daily living). During a record review, Resident 106's care plan initiated 8/4/2025, indicated, Resident 106 uses antidepressant medication related to depression (a serious mood disorder that affects how you feel, think, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and concurrent record review, the facility failed to ensure three out of seven employees (Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Housekeeping, Activities Assistant, and Occupational Therapist (OT - assess a person's physical, cognitive, and emotional abilities and develops treatment plans to improve their functional skills, adapting the environment or activities as needed) completed their competencies annually and or upon hire. This failure had the potential for the staff not to provide the appropriate nursing skills and related care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment.Findings: During an interview and concurrent record review on 8/7/25 at 8:42 AM, four of seven employee files were reviewed with the Director of Staff Development (DSD and the following were noted: 1. LVN 1 was hired on 3/14/2022. There was no annual physical examination for years 2023 and 2024, there was no annual Tuberculin (TB - is a serious illness that mainly affects the lungs) skin test for the years 2023 and 2024, no background check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call system was functional including the audible sounds to alert the staff for one out of five sampled residents (Resident 2).This deficient practice had potential in a delay in meeting the residents' needs for assistance and could lead to frustration, falls and accidents.Findings:During a review of the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including bilateral primary osteoarthritis of the hip (means that both hip joints are experiencing a wearing down of cartilage, leading to pain and stiffness, without any specific, identifiable cause), asthma (respiratory condition marked by spasms in the bronchi of the lungs, causing difficulty in breathing) and urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract).During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - resident assessment tool) dated 6/28/2025, indicated Resident 2's cognitive (mental action or process of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment by failing to ensure two of two shower rooms (Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] and Shower room [ROOM NUMBER]) were clean and free from urine smell. This failure resulted in a foul-smelling environment and the adjacent hallway. Findings: .During a review of the admission Record indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including type II Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), muscle weakness (weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle), asthma (respiratory condition marked by spasms in the bronchi of the lungs, causing difficulty in breathing) and anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one ' s daily activities). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS – resident assessment tool) dated 3/27/2025, it indicated Resident 9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to : I. Ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 6) ' s medications were properly stored and documented according to facility ' s policy and procedures (P&P). II. Ensure the medications were administered timely as ordered by the physician for three of three sampled residents (Resident 6, Resident 8 and Resident 9) according to facility ' s P&P. This deficient practice increased the risk for accidents, unintended complications from receiving more or less than the required medications dose and jeopardized resident ' s health and safety by failing to administer necessary medications in accordance with the physician order. Findings: 1. During a review of the admission Record indicated Resident 6 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including psoriatic arthritis mutilans (a severe, rare form of psoriatic arthritis that causes significant joint damage and bone loss, often in the hands and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive care plan that met the care/services based on the resident's individual assessed needs for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: a. Developed and implemented an individualized CP for Resident 1 ' s left lower foot wound when Resident 1 was readmitted on [DATE]. b. Developed an individualized CP for Resident 1 ' s complaint of pain and discomfort. c. Developed an individualized CP for Resident 1 ' s refusal of turning and repositioning schedules to prevent skin breakdown. d. Implementing a person-centered CP when Resident 1 had episodes of aggressiveness toward staff. These deficient practices had the potential to result negative impact on residents ' health and safety, as well as the quality of care and services received. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1, a [AGE] year-old male resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the skin assessments were accurate upon admission ad the skin impairment did not get worse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 5). This deficient practice had the potential to delay the provision of necessary care and services and deterioration of residents ' current wounds. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including fracture of neck of left femur (a break, crack or crush injury of the thigh bone), muscle weakness (weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle) and Alzheimer ' s Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS – resident assessment tool) dated 4/22/2025 indicated Resident 5 ' s cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) skills for daily decisions was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 5 required moderate to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident receives appropriate treatment and services to increase, prevent, or maintain the range of motion (ROM- the extent of movement of a joint) and mobility for one of four sampled resident (Resident 1) according to facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Repositioning. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for further ROM decline and contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1, a [AGE] year-old male resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed causing seizures), chronic kidney disease (CKD-a longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), chronic congestive heart failure (CHF-a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively manage one of four sampled residents, (Resident 1 ' s) pain by not properly identifying the characteristics of pain with consistent approach and a standardized pain assessment instrument appropriate to resident ' s cognitive level according to the facility ' s policy and procedure titled, Pain – Clinical Protocol. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 experienced unnecessary pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1, a [AGE] year-old male resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed causing seizures), chronic kidney disease (CKD-a longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), chronic congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling) and a past medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care to one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) by failing to address behavioral health care needs and implementing a person-centered care plan when Resident 1 had episodes of aggressiveness toward staff. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of behavioral health care and services to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1, a [AGE] year-old male resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed causing seizures), chronic kidney disease (CKD-a longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), chronic congestive heart failure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide preventive care consistent with professional standards of practice to one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) who was at risk for development of pressure injuries, by failing to: 1. Ensure the appropriate setting of the low air loss mattress (LAL-a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds) was properly set up according to physician ' s (MD) order. 2. Ensure Resident 1 ' s weight was monitored and recorded according to facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P). These deficient practices placed Resident 1 at risk of poor wound healing of the current pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) and possibly development of a new pressure injury. Findings: During record review, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including venous insufficiency (a condition where the veins in the legs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents, Resident 1 ' s court delegated general power of attorney (POA – authorizes someone else to handle certain matters, such as finances or health care, on someone ' s behalf. If a power of attorney is durable, it remains in effect if the person become incapacitated for any reason, including illness and accidents) was informed of Resident 1 ' s health care decision. This deficient practice violated Resident 1 ' s legal POA to be notified and placed the resident at risk for making informed decisions he was not able to recognize based on the medical condition. Findings: A review of the Face sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), chronic kidney disease (CKD-a longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure) and atherosclerotic heart disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Director of Nursing (DON) works onsite for at least 8 consecutive hours a day from 11/2024 to 1/3/2025. This deficient practice had the potential for facility ' s inability to manage and oversee nursing services provided to the residents. Findings: During an interview with Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) on 1/3/2025 at 3:17 p.m., RN 1 stated, the DON has been out of sick leave since November 2024. RN 1 stated, there is no DON interim since the DON has been out. RN 1 stated, she does now know who the clinical consultant in the facility and had not seen any and there is no managing the nursing services. During a concurrent interview and record review of the DON ' s timesheet record with Medical Record Director (MRD) as of 1/3/2024, the MRD stated, the DON does not have any timesheet record available. During an interview with Administrator-in-Training on 1/3/2025 at 3:39 p.m., AIT stated, the DON has been out on leave since November 2024. AIT stated, there is no DON interim in the facility, and they did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan that met the care/services based on the resident's individual assessed needs for one of two sampled residents (Resident 4) by failing to ensure that a comprehensive (CP) was developed after Resident 2 had a change of condition for dislodgment of nephrostomy tube (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the kidney through the skin to drain urine directly into a collection bag). This deficient practice had the potential to result negative impact on residents ' health and safety, as well as the quality of care and services received. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including displacement of nephrostomy catheter (it can occur when the tube falls out or becomes mispositioned, which can lead to decreased or absent urine output), and fibromyalgia (a condition that causes pain all over the body, sleep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's peripheral catheter (is a thin tube inserted into a vein for therapeutic purposes such as administration of medications, fluids and/or blood products) dressing was labeled and documented as indicated in the facility policy for one out of two sampled resident (Resident 2). This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for developing infections at the IV site. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including polymyositis with myopathy (refers to a condition where polymyositis, an inflammatory muscle disease, is accompanied by muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and cerebral atherosclerosis (build-up of fats, cholesterol, and other substance in and on the arterial walls). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - resident assessment tool) dated 12/23/2024, indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of her individuality for five out of four sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to ensure the staff was not standing over the Resident 61 while feeding and assisting her during a meal. This deficient practice had the potential to result in feelings of decreased self-esteem and self-worth for Resident 1. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and chronic kidney disease (CKD-a longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 11/1/2024, indicated Resident 1's cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) skills for daily decisions was moderately impaired.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedures (P&P) titled Resident Rights, reviewed on 4/17/2024. By failing to inform one of four sampled residents (Resident 1 ' s) legal representatives of a change in the condition or status of the resident on 8/6/2024. This deficient practice violated the resident and legal representative right to be notified and participate in changes to the plan of care. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) and unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). A review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical dated 7/21/2024 indicated, Resident 1 had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS – a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 7/26/2024, indicated Resident 1 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medical records were readily available and producible upon request for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) as per facility policy procedures (P&P) titled Access to Personal and Medical Records, reviewed on 4/17/2024. By failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 1's medical records were kept up to date with the most recent Durable Power of Attorney (POA – authorizes someone else to handle certain matters, such as finances or health care, on someone ' s behalf. If a power of attorney is durable, it remains in effect if the person become incapacitated for any reason, including illness and accidents) for healthcare doucmentation. 2. Provide Resident 1's DPOA with a medical record release form when requested. This deficient resulted in Resident 1 ' s DPOA for healthcare not having access to medical records and important medical history and treatment records. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the follow it ' s Policy and procedure by failing to report an Unusual Occurrence (Resident elopement) within 24hrs to the State Survey Agency for one out of 3 sampled residents (Residents 1). This deficiency practice placed the health and safety of Resident 1 at risk of exposure to heat or cold exposure, dehydration, other medical complications and being struck by a motor vehicle. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental health condition characterized primarily by symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (a disorder that develops when a person has experienced or witnessed a scary, shocking, terrifying, or dangerous event), Major depressive disorder (a serious mental health condition that involves a persistent low mood, loss of interest in activities, and other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide monitoring and supervision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to ensure Resident 1 did not elope from the facility (leaving the facility premises safe area without the facility's knowledge and supervision). This deficiency practice placed the health and safety of Resident 1 at risk of exposure to heat or cold exposure, dehydration, other medical complications and death. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental health condition characterized primarily by symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (a disorder that develops when a person has experienced or witnessed a scary, shocking, terrifying, or dangerous event), Major depressive disorder (a serious mental health condition that involves a persistent low mood, loss of interest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his/her individuality for five of 18 sampled residents (Residents 27, 37, 50 61, and 81) by failing to: A. Ensure staff did not stand over Resident 61 while feeding and assisting the resident during a meal. Facility failed to ensure staff are not standing over resident while feeding for Resident 61 B. Assist Resident 27 with setting-up dinner tray on the resident's bedside table. C. Assist Resident 81 clean-up food crumbs on the resident's clothes and bed linen after the resident had finished eating dinner. D. Ensure staff did not speak in a language not understood by Residents 50 and 37 in accordance with the facility's employee handbook updated 6/2021. These deficient practice had the potential to result in feelings of decreased self-esteem and self-worth for Residents 27, 61 81, and Resident 50 and 37's primary language not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents and/or responsible party (RP) was informed and consented in advance, of the risks and benefits of pneumonia (PNA-infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs and can be life-threatening to anyone but particularly to infants, children, and people over [AGE] years old) vaccines and immunization (a simple, safe, and effective way of protecting people against harmful diseases, before they come into contact) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 52). This deficient practice violated the resident's right to make an informed decision regarding the use of vaccinations and immunizations. Findings: A review of Resident 52's admission Record, indicated Resident 26 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (condition in which your blood does not get enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), dementia (loss of cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. A review of the Resident 51's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 51 on 05/17/2019 with diagnoses cerebral infarction (stroke- damage to tissues in the brain), malignant neoplasm of the prostate (a cancerous tumor in the gland of the male reproductive system.), overactive bladder (has an urgent need to urinate multiple times per day and/or night), dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing) abnormality with gait and mobility (alterations in the way of walking) and hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of Resident 51's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 05/11/2024, indicated Resident 51 had severe cognitive impairment (The mental ability to make decisions of daily living), required partial/moderate assistance with eating and upper body dressing. The MDS indicated Resident 51 required substantial/maximal assistance with lower body dressing, toileting, and was non-ambulatory. During an initial tour observation on 7/19/24 at 7:07 PM, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for three out of 18 sampled residents (Resident 44, 74 and 59) by failing to: 1. Ensure residents' rooms were kept with comfortable sound levels maintained for two of three sampled residents (Resident 59 and 74). 2. Ensure the window blind, bedside drawer and electric wall plug were maintained and in functional working condition for one of three sampled resident (Resident 44). These deficient practices had the potential to negatively impact the resident's quality of life and placed Residents 59, 74, and 44 an increased level of discomfort and inability to sleep during the night. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 59's admission Record, dated 7/21/24, indicated Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type two, peripheral vascular disease (PVD, a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide preventive care consistent with professional standards of practice to three of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 16, and 292), who was at risk for developing of pressure injuries (Damage to an area of the skin caused by constant pressure on the area for a long time), by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 292 had bilateral heel protectors (devices that include foam or gel that are used to help prevent heel pressure ulcers) placed while in bed per physician's order (MD order). 2. Ensure the appropriate settings for the low air loss mattress (LALM-a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds) for Residents 1 and 16 according to MD's order and/or the facility's policy. These deficient practices placed Residents 1, 16, and 292 at risk of poor wound healing of the current pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) and development of new pressure injury/ies. Cross…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of five sampled residents (Residents 26 and 52) psychotropic (A drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood) medication regimens were managed and monitored to promote or maintain the highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being by failing to: 1. Ensure implementation of the facility's pharmacy recommendation for Resident 26's Risperdal (anti-psychotic medication) use. 2. Ensure the informed consents were in placed timely for Resident 52's physician's order for psychotropic medications. These deficient practices had the potential to place Resident 26 and 52 at risk of receiving unnecessary medications and/or overuse of medication and adverse consequences while using the medications. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 26's admission Record, indicated Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a. Ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 66) who was on a transmission-based isolation for extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL - an enzyme found in some strains of bacteria that can't be killed by many of the antibiotics that doctors use to treat infections) was placed into a private single room. b. Ensure staff wore appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses, PPE may include respirators, gloves, overalls, boots, disposable gowns, and goggles) when providing care to one of four sampled residents (Resident 192) who is on a transmission-based precaution room. c. Ensure one of five sampled residents, (Resident 292), who had an active infection of Escherichia coli in urine (E. coli - bacteria that normally lives harmlessly in the human intestinal tract, but it can cause serious infections if it gets into the urinary tract) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's interdisciplinary team (IDT-a coordinated group of experts from several different fields who work together) failed to ensure that a resident would not be allowed to keep medications at the bedside without a physician's order and/or without being assessed to determine if the resident is capable to self-administer medications for one of 18 sample residents (Resident 292). This deficient practice had a potential for resident 292 to self-medicate himself and delayed necessary health intervention. Findings: A review of Resident 292's admission Record indicated Resident 292 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Paraplegia (the inability to voluntarily move the lower parts of the body), Dorsalgia (low back pain, mid back pain or sciatic nerve related pain, that originate in muscles, nerves or joints), muscle weakness, immunodeficiency (The decreased ability of the body to fight infections and other diseases),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed, offered or followed up regarding Advance Directive (ACHD - written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) in a timely manner for four of 18 sampled residents (Resident 61). This deficient practice had the potential to cause conflict with Resident 61's wishes regarding health care. Findings: A review of Resident 61's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (lack of blood flow resulting in severe damage to some of the brain tissue), type two diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), and major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that causes a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan (CP) that met the care/services based on the resident's individual assessed needs for one of six sampled residents (Resident 16) by failing to ensure that a comprehensive CP was developed and implemented for Resident 16's low-air-loss (LAL - a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds) mattress. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a negative impact on residents' health and safety and the quality of care and services received increasing the risk for Resident 16 to develop pressure ulcers/injuries (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin). Cross Reference F686 Findings: A review of Resident 16's admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy (a disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected by some agent or condition-such as viral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five sampled residents (Resident 61 and Resident 63), who were at high risk for fall and injuries and who required extensive assistance during repositioning according to the residents care plan. This failure had the potential to place Residents 61 and 63 at risk for falls or injury possible fracture (break in bone) while being transferred from wheelchair to the bed solely by Certified Nursing Assistant 3 (CNA 3). Findings: A. A review of Resident 61's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (lack of blood flow resulting in severe damage to some of the brain tissue), type two diabetes mellitus (DM-a long term condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), and major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that causes a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the call lights were answered timely for three of six residents sampled (Residents 37, 50 and 59). This deficient practice resulted in a delay to services and care required by Residents 37, 50, and 59. Findings: A review of Resident 37's admission Record, dated 7/21/24, indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type two, ulcerative colitis (an inflammatory bowel disease causing irritation and ulcers in the lining of your large intestine), generalized muscle weakness, abnormal gait and mobility, and hypertensive (high blood pressure) heart failure (a condition in which the heart has trouble pumping blood thought the body). A review of Resident 37's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/18/24, indicated, the resident has the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and screening tool), dated 6/5/24, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post in a visible and prominent place daily; the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staffing directly responsible for resident care per shift for three of three sampled days (7/19/2024, 7/20/2024, and 7/21/2024). This deficient practice had the potential to prevent residents and visitors from knowing the accurate and final Direct Care Services Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD) and had the potential to cause inadequate staffing. Findings: During an observation on 7/19/2024 at 9:19 p.m., located in the nurses' station, nurse staffing hours information dated 7/19/2024 was posted with missing actual nursing staffing hours. During an observation on 7/20/2024 at 9:45 a.m., located in the nurses' station, nurse staffing hours information dated 7/20/2024 was posted with missing actual nursing staffing hours. During an observation on 7/21/2024 at 9:52 a.m., located in the nurses' station, nurse staffing hours information dated 7/21/2024 was posted with missing actual nursing staffing hours. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident 29's Yupelri (Revefenacin-medication being given via inhalation [inhaling medication in the form of gas or vapor] used to help muscles around the airways of the lungs to relax) inhalation solution was stored properly per manufacturer's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the safety and effectiveness of medication, resulting in medication error when administered to Resident 29. Findings: A review of Resident 29's admission Record, indicated Resident 29 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including asthma (respiratory condition marked by spasms in the bronchi of the lungs, causing difficulty in breathing), pneumonia (PNA-infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs which may fill with fluid) and generalized muscle weakness. A review of Resident 29's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive standardized assessment and care-screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide palatable flood for two of six residents sampled (Residents 59 and 84). This failure resulted in bland, unpalatable food being served to the residents and surveyors. Findings: A review of Resident 59's admission Record, dated 7/21/24, indicated Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type two, peripheral vascular disease (PVD - a disorder that involves the narrowing of peripheral blood vessels), generalized muscle weakness, difficulty walking, hear failure and lymphedema (tissue swelling). A review of Resident 59's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/13/24, indicated, the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 59's Minimum Data Set (MDS - A standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 4/11/24, indicated the resident required set up or clean-up assistance with eating, and required maximal assistance from staff for toileting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed implement appropriate sanitation and food handling practices by failing to discard expired food stored in the resident's nutrition refrigerators. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unsafe food management. Findings: During an observation with concurrent interview on 7/21/24 at 10:38 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the facility's resident nutrition refrigerator was reviewed. There was one container of food labeled with a use by date of 6/27/24 and another with a brought in date of 7/18/24. The DS stated those containers of food with past use by dates should have been thrown out, because it is past the use by date or 48 hours after the food was brought in. A review of the facility's policy and procedures (P&P), titled Foods Brought by Family/Visitors, reviewed 4/17/24, indicated, Food brought to facility by visitors and family is permitted . Family/visitors are asked to prepare and transport food using safe flood handling practices . Food brought by family/visitors that is left with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control measures necessary to prevent the spread of infections by failing to ensure the staff wore full personal protective equipment (PPE-mask, gown, eye protection, gloves) per facility policy and procedures (P&P) titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) with an effective date of 4/1/2024 before providing care and treatment for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) requiring enhanced barrier precautions (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs] in nursing homes). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the spread of disease and infection to all 90 residents, visitors, and staffs. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including malignant neoplasm of spinal cord (a disease in which malignant (cancer) cells form in the tissues of the spinal cord), type…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice and implement the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Administering Medications for one of four sampled residents (Resident 3), when resident refused her eyedrop medication. This deficient practice has the potential to result in Resident 3 in unintended complications related to the management of glaucoma (a group of eye diseases that can cause vision loss and blindness by damaging a nerve in the back of your eye called the optic nerve). Findings: A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including toxic encephalopathy (a chemical imbalance in the blood affecting the brain), unspecified glaucoma, and muscle weakness. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool), dated 3/22/2024, indicated Resident 3's cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards to maintain skin integrity to one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 2's received foot care and surgical wound skin treatment as ordered by the physician. 2. Implement the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Wound Care to promote healing of Resident 2's surgical wound. These deficient practices had the potential to result in Resident 2 in unintended complications related to the management of his surgical wounds. Cross Reference F755 Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including displaced spiral fracture (the parts of the bone at the break no longer line up correctly) of shaft of right fibula (calf bone) and tibia (shinbone), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), atrial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) by failing to ensure that Resident 2's medications were not left unattended at the bedside. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 2 in unintended complications related to the management of medications. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including displaced spiral fracture (the parts of the bone at the break no longer line up correctly) of shaft of right fibula (calf bone) and tibia (shinbone), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), atrial fibrillation (afib- an irregular and very rapid heart rhythm that and can lead blood clots in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-02 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the discharge summary was documented by the physician for one of five sampled residents (Resident 5). This deficient practice resulted in incomplete records for Resident 5. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (a heart condition that causes an irregular and often abnormally fast heart rate), heart failure (when the heart muscle cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), and acute kidney failure (a condition in which the kidneys stop working and are not able to remove waste and extra water from the blood). A review of Resident 5 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) dated 12/4/2023, indicated the resident was cognitively intact (undamaged mental abilities, including remembering things, making decisions, concentrating, or learning), and required partial/moderate assistance with dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-02 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD - refers to the actual hours of work performed per patient day by a direct caregiver) was posted daily. As a result, the actual hours of work performed per patient day by a direct caregiver were not readily accessible to residents and visitors. Findings: During an observation on 3/2/2024 at 5:41 AM, the posted DHPPD included the projected hours for 3/1/2024. The facility did not post a DHPPD to indicate the actual direct care service hours for 3/1/2024 or the projected hours for 3/2/2024. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/2/2024 at 2:45 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the Director of Staff Development (DSD) was responsible for calculating the DHPPD hours. The DON stated there were no calculated actual DHPPD hours for 3/1/2024 and no projected hours for 3/2/2024. The DON also stated the facility staff were required to post the projected and actual DHPPD staffing hours daily to allow residents and visitors to see…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively manage a resident's pain by not ordering and following up on physician ' s order upon admission of Resident 1 on 1/22/2024 for one five sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 experienced unnecessary pain. Findings: A review of admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including fibromyalgia (a condition that causes pain all over the body, sleep problems, fatigue, and often emotional and mental distress), type II diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), and muscle weakness. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) dated 1/26/2024, indicated Resident 1 ' s cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) skills for daily decisions was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required moderate to maximal assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its diet menu instructions with garlic bread for six out of six sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). This had the potential for residents to not receive the nutrition they need. Findings: A review of admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including fibromyalgia (a condition that causes pain all over the body, sleep problems, fatigue, and often emotional and mental distress), type II diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), and muscle weakness. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) dated 1/26/2024, indicated Resident 1 ' s cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) skills for daily decisions was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required moderate to maximal assistance from staffs for activities of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy regarding reporting of residents ' allegation of abuse and to submit a conclusion report of investigation within five days or in accordance with state or federal law for two of five sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 4). This resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the Department of Public Health to ensure the residents' allegation of abuse was investigated which can also lead to a delay in prevention of further abuse for Resident 3 and 4. Findings: a. A review of admission Record indicated Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified asthma (respiratory condition marked by spasms in the bronchi of the lungs, causing difficulty in breathing), atrial fibrillation (afib- an irregular and very rapid heart rhythm that and can lead blood clots in the heart) and muscle weakness. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policy by failing to report an allegation of abuse within 2 hours or in accordance with state or federal law for two of two sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 4). This resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the Department of Public Health to ensure the residents' allegation of abuse was investigated which can also lead to a delay in prevention of further abuse for Resident 3 and Resident 4. Cross Reference F609. Findings: a. A review of admission Record indicated Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified asthma (respiratory condition marked by spasms in the bronchi of the lungs, causing difficulty in breathing), atrial fibrillation (afib- an irregular and very rapid heart rhythm that and can lead blood clots in the heart) and muscle weakness. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that met the care/services based on the resident's individual assessed needs for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident 1 ' s self-administration medications and own medications at bedside. This deficient practice had the potential to result negative impact on residents ' health and safety, as well as the quality of care and services received. Cross Reference F761. Findings: A review of admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including fibromyalgia (a condition that causes pain all over the body, sleep problems, fatigue, and often emotional and mental distress), type II diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), and unspecified asthma (respiratory condition marked by spasms in the bronchi of the lungs, causing difficulty in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 1) medications were properly stored and secured per facility ' s policy. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to medication under and/or overdosing which could result in serious injury, harm, and death. Findings: A review of admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including fibromyalgia (a condition that causes pain all over the body, sleep problems, fatigue, and often emotional and mental distress), type II diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), and unspecified asthma (respiratory condition marked by spasms in the bronchi of the lungs, causing difficulty in breathing). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) dated 1/26/2024, indicated Resident 1 ' s cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy on Answering the Call Light by failing to ensure the call light (a device used by a resident to call for help) for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 5) were answered timely. This deficient practice resulted to a delay in answering Resident 4 ' s and Resident 5 ' s request for help. Findings: A review of Resident 4 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition where the lungs have a hard time loading your blood with oxygen or removing carbon dioxide) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment), dated 1/19/2024, indicated Resident 4 had moderate cognitive (thought process) impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident 4 needed setup…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate resident allergies, intolerances and preferences for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 5) by failing to ensure: 1. A dietary screening assessment was performed when Resident 5 was admitted to the facility. 2. Resident 5 does not receive foods she is allergic to. This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to experience an allergic reaction and had the potential for the resident to consume less food than their body needed, which could lead to weight loss and malnutrition. Findings: A review of Resident 5 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fibromyalgia (a chronic [long-lasting] disorder that causes pain and tenderness throughout the body, as well as fatigue and trouble sleeping) and Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19, a virus that causes respiratory illness that can spread from person to person). The admission record indicated Resident 5 was allergic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served was palatable and at the proper temperature. The deficient practice had a potential for resident in the facility not to eat the served food and had the potential to cause weight loss and dehydration that may result in nutritional requirements not being met. Findings: A review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive (a syndrome of weight loss, decreased appetite and poor nutrition, and inactivity, often accompanied by dehydration, depressive symptoms, impaired immune function, and low cholesterol), asthma (respiratory condition marked by spasms in the bronchi of the lungs, causing difficulty in breathing) and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 1/4/2023, indicated Resident 32 has moderately impaired cognition (mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program according to their policy and procedure by failing to ensure the Hoyer cloth slings (patient lift slings) are properly stored in a clean storage area. This deficient practice placed residents and staffs at risk at a higher risk of acquiring and transmitting infections to other residents in the facility. Findings: During an observation of the facility on 1/10/2024 at 12:03 p.m., observed shower room [ROOM NUMBER] with wet floor, shower chairs and laundry bin. Observed multiple Hoyer lift slings hanging inside the shower room, some were touching the floor. Observed the shower room with a laundry bin with no cover, full of soiled cloths, towels and linen used by the residents. During an interview with Director of Staff and Development (DSD) on 1/10/2024 at 12:06 p.m., DSD stated, the shower room is being used by multiple residents on a daily basis. DSD further stated, inside the shower room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' privacy and dignity by failing to ensure the urinary catheter (foley catheter - a soft hollow tube which is passed into the bladder to drain urine, for persons who cannot empty their bladder in the usual way) drainage bag was always covered for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 1's sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis (a life-threatening condition that arises when the body ' s response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs), extended spectrum beta lactamase resistance, (ESBL- a type of enzyme or chemical produced by bacteria that can cause resistance to some antibiotics when treating bacterial infections), type II diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that met the care/services based on the resident's individual assessed needs for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident 1's indwelling urinary catheter (foley catheter - a hollow tube left implanted in a body canal or organ, especially the bladder, to promote drainage). This deficient practice had the potential to result negative impact on residents' health and safety, as well as the quality of care and services received. Cross Reference F550. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis (a life-threatening condition that arises when the body ' s response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs), extended spectrum beta lactamase resistance, (ESBL- a type of enzyme or chemical produced by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure precautions were taken for resident ' s individual safety, as well as the safety of others in the facility for one of four sampled residents (Resident 3). The facility was aware Resident 3 used a personal lighter and cigarettes and oxygen concentrators were stored together in Resident 3 ' s room. This deficient practice had the potential for fire related accidents in the facility among residents, staffs, and visitors. Findings: A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy (happens when the nerves that are located outside of the brain and spinal cord [peripheral nerves] are damaged), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one ' s daily activities), hypertension (HTN - elevated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care services for one out of one sampled resident (Resident 3) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 3's nasal cannula (NC -a connector attached to oxygen) tubing and humidifier (a device used to make supplemental oxygen moist) was changed per facility ' s policy. 2. Ensure Resident 3's NC was not on the floor. 2. Ensure a physician's order are in place for oxygen therapy. These deficient practices had the potential for the residents to develop respiratory infection. Findings: A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy (happens when the nerves that are located outside of the brain and spinal cord [peripheral nerves] are damaged), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety or fear that are strong enough to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of four sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4) who were admitted to the facility with wounds received the necessary care and services for wound care treatment as evidenced by: 1. Failing to transcribe and document the wound care specialist and medical doctor ' s recommendation on wound care treatment for Resident 2 ' s right leg chronic wound and Resident 3 ' s left ankle diabetic ulcer. 2. Failing to ensure wound care treatments were documented for Resident 4. These deficient practices had the potential to worsen Resident 2, Resident 3 and Resident 4 ' s wound and place Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4 at risk for infection. Findings: A review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included necrotizing fasciitis (a rare but severe type of bacterial infection that spreads rapidly and can destroy muscle and fat in the body),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the nursing staff failed to answer the call light or call bell promptly for one of three sampled resident's (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in receiving the necessary care and services and to cause the resident to suffer harm and injury. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (CKD - longstanding disease of the kidneys' failure to filter waste from the blood and excrete into the urine), epilepsy (a broad term used for a brain disorder that causes seizures [may cause loss of consciousness, falls, or massive muscle spasms]), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). A review of Resident 1's care plan for potential for falls, initiated on 9/22/2022, indicated to keep the call bell in reach and to answer promptly. A review of the Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 1's refusal to be repositioned and for perineal (between the legs) care for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in the treatment plan, lead to inadequate care, and potentially cause injury to the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a progressive disease involving damage to part of the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord), osteomyelitis (infection in a bone), and pressure ulcers (pressure injury - localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) of the right and left heel. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 8/24/2023, indicated the resident was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) were provided necessary treatment and services to prevent formation of and promote healing of pressure sore (a wound caused when an area of skin is placed under constant pressure) by: -Failing to transcribe physician's orders for Resident 1's left heel pressure sore. -Failing to document and treat wound care provided for Resident 1's left heel wound from 8/25/2023 through 8/29/2023. -Failing to develop a care plan for Resident 1's left heel pressure sore for 18 days. These deficient practices had the potential to delay provision of necessary care to promote Resident 1's wound healing. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated the facility readmitted Resident 1 on 6/23/2023, with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important metal functions), dementia (memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a privacy cover for the urinary drainage bag for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice caused an increased risk for Resident 1's loss of privacy and dignity. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the facility re-admitted the resident on 7/29/2023 with diagnoses including a pressure ulcer (pressure injury - localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence) on the right buttocks Stage IV, attention to gastrostomy (GT- a small tube surgically inserted through the abdomen wall and into the stomach for nutrition, medication, and fluid administration), and fracture of the sacrum (triangular-shaped bone at the bottom of the spine). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 6/24/2023 indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired (decisions poor; cues/supervision required) and required extensive assistance with one-person assist for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement accident risk and hazard interventions for two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) by failing to complete Smoking Assessments for Residents 1 and 3 and failing to initiate a smoking care plan for Resident 3. These deficient practices had the potential to place Residents 1 and 3 at risk for burns and other injuries caused by fire. Findings: a. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/4/2023, with diagnoses including depression (a mood disorder that causes feeling of sadness, and loss of interest), and anxiety disorder (repeated episodes of sudden feelings of fear or worry). A review of Resident 1's Smoking Observation/Assessment form dated 8/5/2023, indicated Resident 1 was a smoker, and smoked between one and two times per day. The assessment did not indicate whether or not the resident required a smoking apron, cigarette holder, supervision, or one-on-one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) received care and services in accordance with the Physician's Orders by failing to ensure Resident 1 was seen and evaluated by a Registered Dietician (RD-a professional who has training and education in food and nutrition). This deficient practice resulted in the failure to deliver necessary care and services for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/4/2023, with diagnoses including depression ( a mood disorder that causes feeling of sadness, and loss of interest), and anxiety disorder (repeated episodes of sudden feelings of fear or worry). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 8/9/2023, indicated the resident had intact cognition (decisions consistent/reasonable) and required extensive assistance with one person physical assist for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. A review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer four doses of Metformin (medication used to treat high blood sugar) and two doses of glipizide (medication used to treat high blood sugar) on 7/9 and 7/10/2023, per physician's order, to one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). These deficient practices jeopardized Resident 1's health and safety causing an increase in the resident's blood glucose level (hyperglycemia, blood sugar rises above a healthy range that can be dangerous and require immediate treatment) and increased the risk of medical complications, such as eye, kidney, or heart disease or nerve damage. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 7/8/2023, with diagnoses including Type II diabetes mellitus (impairment in the way the body regulates and uses sugar [glucose] as a fuel), vascular dementia (changes to memory, thinking, and behavior resulting from conditions that affect the blood vessels in the brain) and atrial fibrillation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The physician was not informed of Resident 1's elevated blood sugar greater than 400 milligrams (mg) per deciliter (dL), or the missed doses of diabetic medications. These deficient practices caused an increased risk in Resident 1's quality of care and potentially delaying the ordering of necessary interventions. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 7/8/2023, with diagnoses including Type II diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), vascular dementia (changes to memory, thinking, and behavior resulting from conditions that affect the blood vessels in the brain) and atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat). A review of Resident 1's Physician's Order, dated 7/8/2023, included but were not limited to the following: - glipizide (used to treat high blood sugar) 5 mg one time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (a device used to notify the nurse that the resident needs assistance) weas within reach for three of 42 sampled residents (Residents 44, 55 and 327). This deficient practice had the potential to delay care and emergent service necessary for Residents 44, 55 and 327. Findings: a. A review of Resident 44's admission Record, indicated the facility re-admitted Resident 44 resident on 2/9/2021, with diagnoses that included and not limited to hypokalemia (low level of potassium [important mineral and electrolytes in the body] in the blood), COVID-19 (a deadly respiratory disease transmitted from person to person) exposure, muscle weakness, and unsteadiness on feet. A review of Resident 44's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 9/23/2021, indicated Resident 44 had moderately impaired cognition (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) for daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the call light (a device used to notify the nurse that the resident needs assistance) was within reach for three of 42 sampled residents (Resident 44, 55 and 327) as indicated in the care plan. 2. Ensure that low air loss mattress (LAL-a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds) was set as per the weight for one of four sampled residents (Resident 25). 3. Monitor and assess the enteral tube feeding (Nutrition taken through a tube directly to the stomach or small intestine) dressing per physician's order to prevent skin breakdown for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 14) as indicated in the care plan. 4. Develop and implement a person-centered care plan for Resident 56's new start of an anti-depressant medication. These deficient practices had the potential for harm, and or a delay of care and services necessary/required for Resident 14, 25, 44, 55, 56 and 327. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 44's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for five of five sampled residents (Residents 25, 37, 56, 68 and 327) by failing to: 1. Ensure to document anticoagulant (Medication used to prevent blood clots) side effects for Resident 37, 56 and 68. 2. Ensure residents received the necessary care and treatment as per physician' order by the physician for two of five sampled residents (Residents 25 and 327) These deficient practices had the potential to result in unintended adverse effects (harmful effect resulting from a medication or other intervention) related to the use Anticoagulation therapy and had the potential to affect negatively the delivery of care services. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 37's admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 37 on 6/19/2021 with diagnosis that included and not limited to sepsis (A life-threatening complication of an infection), syndrome of Inappropriate Secretion of Antidiuretic Hormone (A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff did not administer 28 doses of expired insulin (a medication used to treat high blood sugar) between [DATE] and [DATE] for one of two residents for whom expired medication was found (Resident 15). This deficient practice increased the risk that Resident 15 may have experienced medical complications due to receiving insulin that had become ineffective possibly resulting in hospitalization or death. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 3:19 PM with the licensed vocational nurse (LVN 2) in Nursing Unit 1, one vial of Humalog (a type of insulin) for Resident 15 was found in Station 1 Medication Cart labeled with an open date of [DATE]. LVN 2 stated that Humalog insulin is only good for 28 days once it is first used or stored in the medication cart at room temperature. LVN 2 stated that administering expired medication to the residents could result in the medications not working properly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1.Ensure expired insulin (a type of medication used to treat high blood sugar) was removed from the medication cart for Residents 15 and 44 in one of two inspected medication carts (Station 1 Medication Cart.) 2. Ensure medications requiring refrigeration were stored in the refrigerator per the manufacturer's requirement for Resident 55 in one of two inspected medication carts (Station 1 Medication Cart.) 3. Ensure one opened vial of eye drops were labeled with an open date per the manufacturer's requirement for Resident 4 in one of two inspected medication carts (Station 1 Medication Cart.) 4. Monitor the temperature in the medication storage room and medication storage room refrigerator in one of two inspected medication rooms (Station 1 Medication Room.) The deficient practices of failing to store or label medications per the manufacturer's requirements, remove expired medications from the medication cart, or monitor temperature in the medication storage room increased the risk that Residents 4, 15, 44,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation and food handling practices by failing to: 1. Ensure the scoopers for food thickener and flour were kept in a protected container or cover per facility's policy 2. Ensure dry food bin containers for condiments/ salad dressing packets, peanut butter single used cup and crackers were kept clean and sanitary. 3. Ensure the refrigerator and freezer temperature log was completed from the evening of 11/18/21 through the morning of 11/22/21. 4. Ensure the chlorine-based red sanitation bucket had a chlorine concentration between 50 parts per million (ppm) to 100 ppm on two separate occasions. 5. Ensure the fans above the food preparation station were clear of dust and grime buildup, the hood, sides and base of the stove were clear of grime and grease buildup, and the areas underneath the dishwashing station and corners were free from dirt and debris. These deficient practices had the potential to result in compromised food qualities, harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination that could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures for two of 42 sampled residents (Resident 14, 25) As a result, two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) did not perform hand hygiene prior to entering and exiting residents' rooms; one Housekeeper did not remove glove and perform hand hygiene prior to exiting resident's room. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the spread of diseases and infection to residents, staffs and visitors. Findings: 1. During an observation on 11/22/21 at 8:50 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) entered Resident 25's room and helped Resident 25 without first performing hand hygiene; CNA 1 exited the resident's room after care and did not perform hand hygiene. During an interview on 11/22/2021 at 8:54 a.m., CNA 1 stated she forgot to use the hand sanitizer prior to entering and exiting Resident 25's room. When asked if she used hand sanitizer prior to entering Resident 25's room, CNA 1 answered no. CNA 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a urinary catheter bag (A device to collect urine from the bladder) had a cover to ensure privacy and dignity for one of five sampled residents (Resident 52). This deficient practice had the potential to lowered self-esteem and violated the right to be treated with respect and dignity for Resident 52. Findings: A review of Resident 52's admission Record, indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 52 on 10/5/2021, with diagnoses not limited to malignant neoplasm (cancer) of bladder, sepsis (A life-threatening complication of an infection) Urinary Tract Infection (UTI-An infection in any part of the urinary system), anemia (A condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells) in chronic kidney disease (Longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), thrombocytopenia (a condition of not having enough platelets [Tiny cells in the blood that help form clots to slow or stop bleeding and to help wounds heal] in the blood), hyperlipidemia (a high amount of fats in the blood),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to draw the privacy curtain or close the room door during application of a medication patch to the right hip for one of four residents (Resident 6) per facility's policy and procedures titled quality of life-dignity. The deficient practice had the potential for embarrassment, humiliation, and a lowered self-esteem for Resident 6. Findings: During medication administration observation in Nursing Unit 1 on 11/23/21 at 9:00 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) was observed apply a lidocaine patch (a topical patch used to treat pain) to Resident 6's right hip. LVN 2 did not draw Resident 6's privacy curtain nor close the door to the resident's room. During an interview with LVN 2 on 11/23/21 at 9:07 a.m., LVN 2 stated she failed to draw the privacy curtain nor close the door when applying lidocaine patch to Resident 6's right hip. LVN 2 further stated the practice violated Residents 6' privacy and was a dignity issue when privacy curtain was not drawn during treatment or medication application to a resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 12), was transferred from Geri chair ([or geriatric chairs] are large, padded chairs with wheeled bases, and are designed to assist seniors with limited mobility) to a bed using a two-person assist with mechanical lift. This deficient practice had the potential to result in falls or injuries to Resident 12 and/or the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 3) who transferred Resident 12 from the Geri chair to bed solely. Findings: During an observation with concurrent interview on 11/22/21 at 03:39 PM, Resident 12 was observed transferred from Geri chair by CNA 3 alone using a Mechanical lift (device used to transfer) to a clean bed. CNA 3 stated she should have had another person to assist her in the use of lift for safety. A review of Resident 12's Face Sheet(admission record), indicated an original admission date of 05/23/2016 with a latest return date of 06/07/2021. The Face Sheet further indicated Resident 12 had diagnoses not limited to: adult failure to thrive (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate setting of the low air loss mattress (LAL-a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds) was properly set up for Resident 25 and 327 according to the residents' needs and professional standard of care. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of poor wound healing of the current pressure ulcer and had a potential to develop new pressure sores/wounds. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 25's admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 25's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Type II diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), contracture of muscle on multiple sites and peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs). A review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the gastrostomy tube site (GT - a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) was cleansed daily and as needed with dressing care as ordered for one of eight sampled resident (Resident 14) who were fed by enteral means. This deficient practice had the potential to result in developing an infection due inadequate GT site and dressing care. Findings: A review of Resident 14's admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 14's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing - taking more time and effort to move food or liquid from your mouth to your stomach), anorexia (eating disorder causing people to obsess about weight and what they eat), and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 8/20/2021, indicated Resident 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to implement its policies and procedures which addressed action and documentation by the facility staff and/or the prescriber in providing the rationale for disagreeing on pharmacy recommendations from the pharmacist medication regimen review (MRR) for two of 42 sampled residents (Resident 37 and 56). This deficient practice increased the risk for adverse medication outcome from possibly unnecessary medication use, leading to negative impact on residents' health and well-being. Findings: a. A review of the face sheet (admission record) indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to sepsis (a life-threatening complication of an infection), syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (a condition where high levels of hormone cause the body to retain water), paranoid schizophrenia (a mental disorder where people interpret reality abnormally), major depressive disorder (a mental disorder characterized by persistently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate was less than five percent (%). Two medication errors out of 28 total opportunities contributed to an overall medication error rate of 7.14% affecting two of four residents observed for medication administration (Residents 24 and 34.) The deficient practices of failing to administer medications with good technique or in accordance with the attending physician's orders increased the risk that Residents 24 and 34 may have experienced health complications related to incorrect medication administration which could have negatively impacted their health and well-being. Findings: During an observation on 11/22/21 at 9:10 AM in Nursing Unit 2, Resident 34 was observed lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated to approximately a 45 degree angle. During an observation on 11/22/21 at 9:13 AM in Nursing Unit 2, the Director of Staff Development (DSD) was observed administering Combigan eye drops (a medication used to treat eye problems) to Resident 34 without lowering the head…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-25 · tag F0912 — isolatedProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 36 resident rooms met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide safe nursing care and privacy for the residents. Findings: On 11/24/2021, the facility administrator (ADM) provided a copy of the Client Accommodation Analysis and a facility letter requesting for a room waiver. A review of the Client Accommodation Analysis indicated one of 31 rooms did not have at least 80 square feet per resident. The room waiver request and Client Accommodation Analysis indicated the following: Room # Beds Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft per resident 31 2 155.24 77.62 The minimum requirement for a 2-bedroom should be at least 160 sq. ft. During the resident council meeting on 11/23/2021 at 2:04 p.m., the attendees did not voice any issues or concerns regarding the room size. During multiple observations from 11/22/2021 through 11/25/2021, both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft. -unit of measure) per resident in one of 35 multiple resident bedrooms (room [ROOM NUMBER])This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate useable living space for the residents and working space for the health caregivers.Findings: During a record review, the facility Request for Room Size Waiver letter, dated 8/5/2025, submitted by the Administrator, indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] did not meet the 80 square feet requirement per resident according to federal regulation. The request for room size waiver letter indicated that the room size did not adversely affect any resident or any resident's special needs. The letter also indicated that both ambulatory and non-ambulatory residents can freely move in the rooms without harm or impediment and there have been no grievances from residents, family members or staff regarding the size of room [ROOM NUMBER]. During a record review, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-07-22 · tag F0837 — patternEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility's governing body (individuals such as facility owner(s), Chief Executive Officer(s), or other individuals who are legally responsible to establish and implement policies regarding the management and operations of the facility) failed provide effective leadership oversight of processes and policies and procedures by failing to ensure the administrator was onsite and available via phone on a full-time basis. This deficienct practice had the potential to not meet/address direct the day-to day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standard, guidelines, and regulations that govern nursing facilities to assure that the highest degree of quality care is provided to the residents. Findings: During an initial facility tour on 7/19/2024 at 8:30PM, the Administrator in Training (AIT) was observed present and working in the facility without the supervision of a licensed and qualified Administrator (ADM) on 7/19/2024 at 5:30pm. During a concurrent interview, the AIT stated, I am newly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft. -unit of measure) per resident in one of 35 multiple resident bedrooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate useable living space for the residents and working space for the health caregivers. Findings: A review of the facility's Request for Room Size Waiver letter, dated 4/19/2024, submitted by the Administrator, indicated there is 1 room not meeting the 80 square feet requirement per resident according to federal regulation. The letter indicated that the the room size (room [ROOM NUMBER]) does not adversely affect any residents or any resident's special needs. The letter also indicated both ambulatory and non-ambulatory residents can freely move in the rooms without harm or impediment and there have been no grievances from residents, family members or staff regarding he room size of the room in question. A review of the undated Client…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$38,272 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $38,272 — penalty dated 2025-03-20
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-18 for 35 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAHBAN, ALFRED | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 01/01/2015 |
| HYDER, ANDREW | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2023 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $845K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055977. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.