No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cascade Terrace Post Acute

5601 SE 122nd Avenue, Portland, OR 97236 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 105 certified beds · (503) 761-3181 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0740)3 immediate-jeopardy citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$185,923 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $185,923 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-28)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8935 SE Powell Blvd · (503) 772-4335 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid1.5 mi
11930 SE Division St · (503) 761-6640 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
11601 SE Foster Rd · (503) 427-8900 · Call to confirm hours
Park
118TH SW Crist Ct · (503) 823-4000 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
11811 SE Harold St · (503) 777-0827

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.0%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%4.7%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.1%4.9%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.4%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.5%20.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.6%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.3%5.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.9%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.8%13.9%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.1%81.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.1%21.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.8%16.1%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.5%CMS range 44.1–71.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.3–13.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting85.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge66.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 4.2–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.721.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.69
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
47.1%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 87.3 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.37 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.82 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-28)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-31)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to keep residents free from hazards, provide appropriate monitoring and supervision for residents with known substance use disorder and a history of illicit drug use, ensure staff possessed adequate knowledge and training regarding substance use, and follow up on recommendations from a fall investigation for 2 of 8 sampled residents (#s 3 and 217) reviewed for accidents and positioning/mobility. This failure was determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation which resulted in a serious adverse outcome for Resident 217, and placed residents at risk for injury, drug overdose, and death. Findings include: The facility's February 2023 policy titled Resident Possession and Use of Illegal Substances indicated the following: -The possession and use of illegal substances by residents will not be tolerated; and -Facility staff will have knowledge of signs, symptoms, and triggers of possible illegal substance use. 1. Resident 217…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure safety interventions and supervision were in place and followed to protect residents from elopement from the facility for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 56) reviewed for elopement. This failure, determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation, resulted in Resident 56 eloping from the facility into heavily trafficked areas and placed residents at risk of avoidable accidents and death. Findings include: The facility's 6/2017 Elopement/Wandering Policy and Procedure revealed the following: -Residents deemed at risk to elope, that reside in an Expressions Unit, or have cognitive deficits will be accompanied by family, responsible party, or a facility staff member when leaving the facility for appointments/outings. -Residents evaluated as at risk for elopement would be in staff eyesight at all times when on facility outings. If staff are unable to keep the resident in line of sight, a designated staff member would accompany the resident on the outing to assist in maintaining resident safety.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-31 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosed mental disorder and documented history of suicide attempts received the necessary behavioral health care and services needed to prevent suicide attempts for 1 of 5 sampled residents (# 52) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure, determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation, resulted in Resident 52 attempting suicide and placed residents at risk for avoidable accidents and death. Findings include: Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including delirium (confusion), dementia with a behavioral disturbance and severe major depressive disorder with psychotic features. An 11/2/23 Progress Note revealed Resident 52 was found with her/his call light cord wrapped around her/his neck, following which the resident was provided with one-to-one supervision. An 11/3/23 Encounter Psych Initial Visit Note completed by Staff 13 (Psychiatric NP) indicated Resident 52 continued to experience suicidal thoughts. The note further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure chemotherapy medications were administered as ordered for 1 of 1 resident (#2) reviewed for chemotherapy medications. This failure resulted in Resident 2 experiencing thrombocytopenia (a medical condition characterized by a lower-than-normal number of platelets in the blood), pancytopenia (a medical condition characterized by a low number red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets) and neutropenia (a condition where there is an abnormally low number of neutrophils in the blood which are a type of white blood cell that plays a crucial role in fighting infections), which caused the resident to require numerous blood transfusions, emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Findings include: The facility's 1/2023 Medication Administration General Guidelines Policy and Procedure indicated medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. If a dose seems excessive considering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1 and 5) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for undignified care. Findings include:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes and depression. Resident 1's 7/25/25 Care Plan identified Resident 1 was at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and adjustment issues, including emotional distress and ineffective coping. The resident's care plan directed staff to use appropriate and effective communication, encourage personal preference and honor quality of life choices to ensure dignity and respect. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility 1/2026 with diagnoses including cellulitis and agoraphobia. Resident 5's 1/23/26 Care Plan identified Resident 5 was at risk for her/his psychosocial well-being, including increased agitation and tearfulness. The resident's care plan directed staff to honor the resident's preferences and choices to promote dignity and decrease anxiety. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse to the State Agency within the required 2 hours for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#9) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk of unreported physical abuse. Findings include:Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy and atrial fibrillation. Resident 9's 11/4/24 Care Plan identified Resident 9 with cognitive loss affecting decision-making ability.A 2/7/26 Facility Incident Report documented on 2/15/26, that Resident 9 placed a pillow over Resident's 8 face and was witnessed throwing heat packs at Resident 8 while the resident was sleeping.On 2/17/26 at 1:44 PM, Staff 11 (RNCM) stated she reported the incident to Staff 1 (Administrator). Staff 11 stated Staff 1 informed her the incident would be investigated but not reported to the State Agency. Staff 11 stated she did not know why the incident was not reported and believed the investigation was handled by facility administration. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement care according to the resident's care plan for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for care plans. This placed residents at risk for unmet personalized care needs. Findings Include:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes and depression.Resident 1's 7/7/25 Cognitive Assessment revealed the resident with a 15 out 15 BIMS score indicating no cognitive impairment.Resident 1's 7/25/25 Care Plan identified Resident 1 preferred individualized preference for female caregivers to ensure and promote a level of comfort when receiving care. The resident's care plan directed staff to ensure female caregivers were available when providing care.On 2/17/26 at 10:19 AM, Resident 1 stated during a routine skin assessment, Staff 6 (RN) did not have an additional female caregiver present in the room as preferred. Resident 1 stated the facility's practice when male nurses performed skin assessments was to have at least on female caregiver present to perform additional peri-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for medication. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include:Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses including obesity and diabetes. The 9/23/25 physician order indicated Resident 1 was to receive semaglutide (Ozempic) injection once weekly.On 12/23/25 at 11:47 AM, Resident 1 stated that she/he missed several doses of Ozempic due to the medication not being ordered. A review of Resident 1's 10/2025, 11/2025 and 12/2025 MARs and TARs indicated she/he did not receive semaglutide on the following dates:-12/16/25-10/30/25-10/23/25-10/16/25-10/9/25-10/2/25Resident 1's Progress Notes indicated that Staff 2 (LPN) administered medication to Resident 1 on 10/2/25, 10/9/25, 10/16/25, 10/23/25 and 10/30/25, but did not administer semaglutide for the following reasons: medication was not filled last week, a new order was needed, the prescription had ended, the resident requested a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-28 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to submit mandatory staffing information based on the payroll data journal and other verifiable and auditable data as required. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate staffing information. Findings include: - The facility's Reporting Direct Care Staffing Information (Payroll-Based Journal) policy, dated 8/2022, indicated complete and accurate direct care staffing information is reported electronically to CMS through the Payroll-Based Journal system. Staffing information is collected daily and reported for each fiscal quarter no later than 45 days after the end of the reporting quarter. Dates included Fiscal Quarter 4 with a date range of 7/1 through 9/30 to be submitted by 11/14. Review of the Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data for fiscal year 2024, quarter four (7/1/24 through 9/30/24), revealed the facility failed to submit required data for the quarter. On 4/28/25 at 12:07 PM, Staff 6 (Payroll/Human Resources) was unaware the data was not submitted and stated the corporate office was responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-28 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to train staff of the elements and goals of the facility QAPI program for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for QAPI training. This placed residents at risk for lack of safety and quality of care. Findings include: On 4/24/25 at 4:42 PM, Staff 6 (Payroll/Human Resources) provided a list of new hire and annual trainings offered by the facility. There was no QAPI training. On 4/25/25 between the hours of 8:15 AM and 8:36 AM, Staff 12 (CNA), Staff 35 (NA), Staff 41 (LPN) and Staff 42 (CNA) reported they were unaware of the facility's QAPI program and had not received any training related to QAPI. On 4/25/25 at 2:05 PM, Staff 1 reviewed the list of new hire and annual trainings provided by the facility and confirmed the facility did not offer QAPI training to staff. Staff 1 stated he expected the facility to provide staff required trainings.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours seven days per week for 4 of 33 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of care. Findings include: Review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports (DCSDR) on 7/20/24, 8/3/24, and from 3/21/25 through 4/21/25 revealed no RN coverage for eight consecutive hours for the following Saturdays: 7/20/24, 8/3/24, 3/22/25 and 4/12/25. On 4/24/25 at 1:14 PM, Staff 6 (Payroll/Human Resources) acknowledged the facility lacked RN coverage on 7/20/24 and 8/3/24. She stated it was very difficult to find RN coverage on weekends. On 4/24/25 at 1:26 PM, Staff 6 acknowledged the facility lacked RN coverage on the DCSDR for 3/22/25 and 4/12/25. On 4/28/25 at 2:25 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) was not aware that there was no RN coverage on the identified days.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to post accurate and complete staffing information for 14 of 34 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents and the public at risk for incomplete and inaccurate staffing information. Findings include: A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Report from 3/21/25 through 4/24/25 revealed incorrect information listed on the following dates: 4/8/25, 4/10/25, 4/11/25, 4/12/25, 4/13/25, 4/14/25, 4/15/25, 4/16/25, 4/17/25, 4/18/25, 4/20/25, 4/21/25 and 4/24/25. A review of the DCSDR on 4/10/25, 4/11/25, 4/12/25, 4/13/25, 4/14/25, 4/15/25, 4/16/25, 4/17/25, 4/18/25, 4/20/25 and 4/21/25 revealed Sitter entered with hours worked for staff count. On 4/24/25 at 8:41 AM, the DCSDR for 4/24/25 was prefilled with morning, evening, and night shift information. The morning shift was signed and had no entries for Nursing Assistants. At 9:02 AM, Staff 35 was observed wearing a badge with CNA under his name and confirmed he was not a CNA. Staff 35 stated he did not have a CNA license in Oregon or any other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored securely and not accessible to unauthorized individuals and failed to ensure medications were not expired for 2 of 7 medication carts and 1 of 1 medication storage room. This placed residents at risk for diminished treatment efficiency and unauthorized access to medications and biologicals. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 8:31 AM a medication cart was observed to be unlocked in the hallway near room eight. Staff and residents were observed walking past the unlocked medication cart. On 4/22//25 at 8:32 AM the medication cart was observed with Staff 20 (CMA) to have over the counter medications and prescription medications inside. On [DATE] at 4:45 AM a medication cart was observed to be unlocked in the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER]. The medication cart was observed to have ceftriaxone (an antibiotic) inside. On [DATE] at 8:50 AM a medication cart was observed to be unlocked in the hallway…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F800 Based on observation, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to meet dietary preferences for 1 of 3 Residents (#468) sampled residents reviewed for food preferences. This placed residents at risk for limited food choices and potential weight loss. Findings include: Resident 468 was admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with diagnoses including diabetes and below the knee amputation. Resident 468's most recent MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 14 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. In an 04/21/25 interview at 1:30 PM Resident 468 stated, she/he would like more food. Resident 468 stated he/she asked staff for bigger portions but did not receive them. Resident 468 stated she/he did not get enough food. On 4/ 24/25 at 12:14 PM Resident 468's meal tray was observed to have an order card for double portions and a hamburger on the side. Resident 468 received small portions and no hamburger. On 04/24/25 at 12:23 PM Staff 36 (CNA), stated there is not a good system in place to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed ensure food was labeled and stored in a manner to avoid spoilage in 1 of 1 kitchen and 2 of 3 nurses stations reviewed for sanitary food storage. The facility also failed to ensure the ice machine was plumbed correctly to prevent backflow of contaminated matter into the ice machine for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitary conditions. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: The facility's undated Key Food Safety Practices policy indicated: -All food must be labeled and dated when opened; and -Raw ingredients will be free from contamination. 1. On 4/21/25 at 9:22 AM the following items were observed in the unit refrigerator located behind Nurses Station One: -Two unlabeled, undated covered plastic ramekins of peanut butter; -One unlabeled, undated covered plastic coffee mug containing a clear liquid and ice; -One previously opened, unlabeled and undated 32 fluid ounce container of Med Pass 2.0+ Vanilla Fortified Nutritional Shake. On 4/21/25 at 9:22 AM Staff 27 (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for safe self-administration of medications for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#28) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration and adverse medication side effects. Findings include: Resident 28 was admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 28's 3/1/25 admission MDS indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment. On 4/23/25 at 1:28 PM, Resident 28 had Aspercreme lidocaine gel (a topical pain reliever primarily used for muscle or joint pain) on her/his bedside table, within reach. Resident 28 stated the Aspercreme was used on her/his heels. Review of Resident 28's health record revealed no self-administration of medication assessment was completed to determine the resident's ability to safely self-administer the Aspercreme lidocaine gel. On 4/23/25 at 1:28 PM, Staff 13 (CNA) stated residents should not have any medications at their bedside and if medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility to maintain the privacy and confidentiality of resident records for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 14, 28 and 48) reviewed for privacy. This placed residents at risk for loss of dignity and privacy. Findings include: The facility's 4/2014 Management and Protection of Protected Health Information (PHI) Policy indicated it was the responsibility of all personnel with access to resident and facility information to ensure that such information was managed and protected to prevent unauthorized release or disclosure. 1a. Resident 48 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including cellulitis (a common bacterial infection of the skin). Observations on 4/24/25 from 12:08 PM to 12:13 PM revealed an unlocked computer screen on one of the facility's treatment carts in the south hallway. The computer screen displayed a picture of Resident 48 as well as the resident's name, gender, date of birth , age, allergies, code status, attending physician, vital signs and her/his scheduled treatments. On 4/24/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 320 was admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with diagnoses including stroke and Type 2 Diabetes (a chronic condition characterized by high blood sugar levels). A review of resident 320's health record revealed her/his admission MDS assessment was in progress and overdue by five days on 4/28/25. On 4/28/25 at 1:31 PM Staff 33 (Assistant Regional Director of Clinical Services) acknowledged Resident 320's admission MDS was not completed within her/his first 14 days in the facility. Staff 33 stated an accurate MDS assessment was necessary to initiate a person-centered care plan for Resident 320. Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete comprehensive assessments within 14 days of admission for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 318, 320, 468) reviewed for comprehensive admission assessments. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 318 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the MDS was coded accurately related to dental and hearing for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 3 and 16) reviewed for dental and communication. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments. Findings include: The facility's 11/2019 Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment Policy revealed any information captured on the MDS reflected the status of the resident during the observation period for that assessment. 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2/2012 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury. A 6/3/24 Dental Treatment Record indicated Resident 3 was fully edentulous (lacking teeth). Resident 3's 12/24/24 Annual MDS revealed the resident was not edentulous. On 4/21/25 at 12:59 PM Resident 3 was observed in her/his room without any natural teeth. On 4/25/25 at 12:10 PM Staff 33 (Assistant Regional Director of Clinical Services) acknowledged Resident 3's Annual MDS was inaccurate and the resident should have been coded as edentulous. 2. Resident 16 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#28) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for a lack of personal hygiene and loss of dignity. Findings include: Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 28's 2/23/25 Bowel and Bladder Care Plan indicated the resident had a catheter due to urine retention and was incontinent of bowel. Resident 28's 2/23/25 [NAME] (a quick reference for CNAs to access a resident's care information)indicated the resident received bathing/showering on Monday and Thursday, day shift or per preference. Resident 28's 3/1/25 admission MDS indicated the resident had intact cognition and was dependent with bathing/showering. Resident 28's 3/2025 and 4/1/25 through 4/23/25 bathing task logs indicated the resident received bathing/showering on the following days: - 3/6, 3/20, 3/27, 3/31, 4/3, 4/10 and 4/23. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activity program for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 28 and 118) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk of a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life. Findings include: The facility's Activity Programs policy, revised 6/2018, indicated the following: -The activities program was provided to support the well-being of residents and to encourage both independence and community interaction. -Activities were based on the comprehensive resident-centered assessment and the preferences of each resident. -All activities were documented in the resident's medical record. -Individualized and group activities were provided that reflected the schedules, choices and rights of the residents. 1. Resident 28 was admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 28's 3/1/25 admission MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain an ordered Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO, a brace worn on the lower leg to provide support and control to the ankle and foot), identify and assess a skin condition or follow physician orders for parameters for a cardiac medication for 3 of 9 sampled residents (#s 3, 13 and 18) reviewed for position and mobility, skin conditions and unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for injury, worsening skin conditions and adverse side effects related to uncontrolled hypertension. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2/2012 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (a condition characterized by paralysis on one side of the body). A 12/12/24 Progress Note revealed Resident 3 was not appropriate for a prefabricated AFO due to her/his left hemiplegia and required a custom orthosis instead. Resident 3's 12/24/24 Annual MDS revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and experienced lower extremity impairment on one side. Resident 3's 1/24/25 PT Evaluation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dialysis services were in place including monitoring and communication with the dialysis provider for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#28) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for dialysis complications and delayed treatment. Findings include: The facility's Hemodialysis (a medical treatment that removes waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not working properly) Care Policy and Procedure, dated 9/1/24 indicated the following: -The licensed nurse completed the dialysis center communication information prior to the resident leaving for dialysis. -Upon the resident's return, the post-dialysis assessment portion of the form was to be completed and attached to the resident's medical record. -Residents who required hemodialysis were provided ongoing assessment and monitoring before and after dialysis treatments including monitoring for complications, issues were documented by the licensed nurse and the medical providers were notified. Resident 6 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor for adverse side effects (ASE) of medications for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#468) reviewed for Anticoagulant medication. This placed residents at risk for medication complications. Findings include: Resident 468 was admitted to the facility on 4/2025 with the diagnosis including Peripheral vascular disease. The April 2025 MAR identified Clopidogrel Bisulfate (anticoagulant medication) 75mg one tablet PO QD at bedtime for clot prevention. There was no evidence that adverse side effects were monitored. Side effects for the medication included according to the Mayo clinic website, Collection of blood under the skin, deep, dark purple bruise. On 4/21/25 at 1:34 PM the resident showed her/his arms which had multiple bruises covering both arms. On 4/21/25 at 1:34 PM Resident 468 stated she/he did not know where she/he got the bruises. In a 04/24/25 interview at 12:23 PM with Staff 36 (CNA) stated that skin checks were completed once a week, and no bruising had been noted. Staff 3 had noted a new skin tear…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide ADL care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for ADL care. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 8/2024, with diagnoses including stroke and cerebral edema (excess fluid in the brain, which causes swelling). Resident 4 was discharged in 9/2024. Resident 4's admission Nursing Database form dated 8/9/24 revealed she/he was alert but not oriented to person, time, or place; she/he was nonverbal and unable to express understanding. Resident 4 was considered an extensive assist for all ADL's and was a one person total assist for bathing. Resident 4's care plan dated 8/10/24 revealed she/he was to be bathed or showered twice a week. On 1/16/25 at 9:40 AM, Witness 4 (Complainant) stated she visited the resident almost daily when she/he was at the facility and bathing just wasn't done. She noted Resident 4 was non verbal and could not refuse showers or baths and recalled family members washed the resident's hair because it would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure tube feeding was administered according to physician orders for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for physician orders. This placed residents at risk for insufficient nutrition. Findings include: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 8/2024, with diagnoses including stroke and cerebral edema (excess fluid in the brain, which causes swelling). Resident 4 was discharged in 9/2024. Resident 4's admission Nursing Database form dated 8/9/24 revealed she/he was alert but not oriented to person, time, or place; was nonverbal and unable to express understanding. Resident 4 was found to have a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem due to her/his NPO (nothing by mouth) and impaired swallowing status. Resident 4's care plan dated 8/10/24 revealed she/he was NPO and received her/his nutrition via a PEG tube. Resident 4's initial physician orders for tube feeding were as followed: -PEG Tube feeding: Standard formula with fiber - Jevity 1/2 (or equivalent) 290 ml 5x/day (0700, 1100, 1500,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate hand hygiene and appropriate use, reuse, disinfection and storage of PPE for 2 of 3 halls reviewed for infection control and failed to develop and implement a water management program and conduct a risk analysis assessment for potential areas of growth and spread of waterborne pathogens for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for the spread of infectious diseases and exposure to waterborne pathogens. Findings include: 1. The facility's 3/2023 Transmission Based Precautions Policy and Procedure specified the following related to droplet precautions: -Masks are donned upon entry into a resident's room with droplet precautions. -Masks are removed prior to leaving the resident's room and hand hygiene is performed. -Residents remain on droplet precautions for the duration of illness or per CDC guidelines. The facility's 12/2021 Hand Hygiene Policy specified hand hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain comfortable sound levels for 2 of 3 hallways observed for environment. This placed residents at risk for an uncomfortable environment. Findings include: Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including anxiety and major depression. Multiple observations from 1/22/24 through 1/24/24 between the hours of 7:30 AM and 9:45 PM revealed Resident 52 frequently yelled and her/his yelling was audible on two of the three facility hallways. Other residents were heard yelling shut up to Resident 52 and Resident 52 yelling back, make me. Resident 52's yelling was noted during daytime and evening observations. On 1/22/24 at 9:52 AM Resident 38 reported Resident 52 yelled for hours every night and day since she/he was admitted to the facility. Resident 38 stated the yelling was mind numbing. Resident 38 stated she/he spoke to multiple staff about Resident 52's yelling and everyone was aware Resident 52 yelled but the yelling continued daily. On 1/23/24 at 11:19 AM Witness 1 (Family)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure timely call light responses for 5 of 5 sampled residents (#s 8, 18, 38, 57 and 59) reviewed for sufficient staffing. This placed residents at risk for delayed and unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 59 was admitted to the facility in 1/2024 with diagnoses including arm fracture. On 1/22/24 at 12:18 PM Resident 59 stated after she/he turned on her/his call light, she/he waited 30 to 40 minutes for staff to respond. Resident 59 stated she/he used her call light when she/he needed her/his soiled incontinence brief changed and it was uncomfortable to sit in a pissy brief for 30 to 40 minutes. On 1/24/24 at 8:39 AM the call light monitor was observed and indicated Resident 59's call light was triggered at 7:58 AM and was unanswered by staff for 41 minutes. On 1/24/24 at 12:13 PM the call light monitor was observed and indicated Resident 59's call light was triggered at 12:01 PM. Resident 59 stated her/his call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were fully informed and understood the binding arbitration agreement for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 27, 36 and 39) reviewed for binding arbitration agreement. This placed residents at risk of being uninformed of their legal rights. Findings include: The facility's undated Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement Between Resident and Facility stated: Revocation of the Agreement. This Agreement may be canceled by the Resident by delivering written notice of revocation to the Facility not later than 5:00 PM local time on the fifth (5th) day after the date the Resident or their representative signs this Agreement. 1. Resident 36 was admitted to the facility in 5/2022 with a diagnosis of stroke. On 1/30/24 at 11:06 AM Resident 36 stated she/he did not recall signing an arbitration agreement. Record review revealed Resident 36 signed the facility's arbitration agreement on 1/19/21. On 1/30/24 at 10:11 AM Staff 44 (Director of Admissions) stated she was responsible for going over the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 5 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 4, 24, 25, 26 and 27) reviewed for evidence of in-service training. This placed residents at risk for lack of quality care. Findings include: On 1/30/24 at 12:28 PM Staff 35 (Staffing Manager) provided a list of training hours for the sampled staff and confirmed the following: -Staff 4 (CNA): 9.5 annual training hours; -Staff 24 (CNA): 11.5 annual training hours; -Staff 25 (CNA): 11.5 annual training hours; -Staff 26 (CNA): 11.5 annual training hours and -Staff 27 (CNA): 11.5 annual training hours. On 1/30/24 at 2:38 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she expected all CNA staff to receive 12 hours of annual in-service training.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure consent was obtained prior to administration of a vaccine for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#51) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for lack of information related to immunization risks, benefits and potential side effects. Findings include: Resident 51 was admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including heart failure. Resident 51's health record revealed a 1/23/24 Physician Order for the RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) vaccination. Resident 51's 1/2024 MAR indicated Staff 21 (LPN) administered the RSV vaccine to Resident 51. Review of Resident 51's health record revealed no evidence to indicate Resident 51 provided consent for the vaccination. There was no documentation to indicate the risks, benefits and potential side effects of the RSV vaccine were discussed or reviewed with Resident 51 prior to administration. On 1/25/24 at 1:21 PM Resident 51 stated she/he received the RSV vaccine last night after dinner. Resident 51 stated she/he did not sign a consent form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure accommodation of resident needs related to light pull cords for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 19 and 51) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This placed residents at risk for loss of independence. Findings include: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 4/2023 with diagnoses including heart failure. Resident 51 was admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including heart failure. On 1/23/24 at 2:16 PM Resident 51's overbed light was observed on the wall, above and behind the resident's bed. The overbed light's pull chain was observed to be approximately four inches long and out of Resident 51's reach. Resident 51 stated she/he could not reach the pull chain and she/he had to rely on staff to turn it off and on for her/him. Resident 51 stated the light often shined in her/his eyes while she/he tried to fall asleep because staff did not turn off the light before they left the room. On 1/26/24 at 11:39 AM Staff 22 (Maintenance Director) stated he conducted room audits weekly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident's representative and physician of a resident's suicide attempt for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#52) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed resident representatives and physicians at risk for being uninformed of current resident status and residents at risk of unmet treatment needs. Findings include: Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including depression with psychotic features. Resident 52's 11/8/23 admission MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact and she/he experienced moderately severe depression and delusional thinking. The MDS assessment also indicated the resident exhibited physical and verbal behaviors directed towards others and other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others which significantly interfered with the resident's care and participation in activities/social interactions. Resident 52's 1/2024 Face Sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) listed Witness 2 (Family) as the first…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by Resident 40 for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#22) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: The facility's 1/2023 Abuse Policy & Procedure specified the following: - Abuse is defined as willful infliction of injury or intimidation resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Injury is defined as extreme physical pain. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including cirrhosis of the liver (impaired liver function). Resident 22's 11/18/23 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including weakness on one side following a stroke. Resident 40's 11/17/23 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. On 1/22/24 at 9:31 AM Resident 22 stated on 11/19/23 at nighttime, Resident 40 beat [her/him] up outside in the smoking area. Resident 22 stated Resident 40 kicked her/his legs, punched…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an alleged violation timely to the state agency for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 5 and 22) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for delayed and incomplete investigations. Findings include: The facility's 1/2023 Abuse Policy and Procedure specified the following: - All staff members were considered mandatory reporters, and as such, were obligated to report using the state reporting mechanism. - If there was abuse or a serious injury the staff member must report the incident within two hours of forming the suspicion to the state survey agency. 1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 12/2020 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury. Resident 5's 9/25/23 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident had a memory problem and was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 5's 12/19/23 at 1:57 PM Progress Note written by Staff 19 (LPN) identified yellowish bruising and swelling to the resident's upper left arm, the resident's left arm was painful during an assessment and an x-ray was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate injuries of unknown origin and rule out potential abuse or neglect for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings include: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 7/2019 with diagnoses including vascular Parkinsonism (a brain condition that causes slow movements, stiffness and tremors.) Resident 8's health record revealed an incident report dated 7/17/23 was completed after Resident 8 reported she/he fell on 7/14/23. Interviews with staff working on 7/14/23 revealed no staff witnessed Resident 8 falling or on the floor. The report indicated Resident 8 would not have been able to get up from the floor by herself/himself if a fall occurred. During the fall investigation, a bruise was noted above Resident 8's left eyebrow and the resident had abrasions on her/his left hip and left lower leg. The abrasion on Resident 8's left hip was cleaned and a foam dressing was applied. The incident report concluded Resident 8 had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement care plan interventions in the area of fall prevention for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 14 and 35) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for potential injury. Findings include: 1. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in 8/2020 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system). Resident 14's 9/5/23 Fall Scale revealed the resident overestimated or forgot her/his limits, had a history of falls, had impaired gait (manner of walking) and was at high risk for falling. Resident 14's 9/6/23 Fall Care Plan indicated the following: -Bilateral fall mats when the resident was in bed. -Resident 14 was at high risk to fall. Resident 14's 12/1/23 Quarterly MDS Assessment revealed the resident experienced moderate cognitive impairment. Observations of Resident 14 conducted from 1/23/24 through 1/25/24 between 9:37 AM to 7:39 PM revealed the resident to be in bed. No fall mats were observed on the resident's floor. On 1/25/24 at 3:04 PM Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to accurately reflect the needs of residents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#52) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 52's 11/8/23 admission MDS indicated the resident experienced loss of liquids/solids from her/his mouth when eating or drinking, held food in her/his mouth/cheeks or residual food in her/his mouth after meals, coughed or choked during meals or when swallowing medications and had complaints of difficulty or pain when swallowing. The MDS assessment also indicated the resident received a mechanically altered and therapeutic diet and she/he required substantial/maximum assistance with eating. Resident 52's 12/7/23 SLP Discharge Summary completed by Staff 38 (SLP) recommended Resident 52 receive a regular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow medication orders for 1 of 5 residents (# 52) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for medication side effects. Findings include: Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including depression with psychotic features. On 1/7/24 Resident 52 was prescribed Seroquel to address behavior/mood changes related to depression with psychotic features. On 1/9/24 Resident 52 was prescribed Oxycodone every six hours as needed for pain. The orders instructed this medication was not to be given within two hours of Seroquel administration. Review of Resident 52's 1/2024 MAR revealed the following: -On 1/9/24 Resident 52 received Seroquel at 4:23 PM and received Oxycodone at 4:24 PM, 1 minute apart in administration. -On 1/10/24 Resident 52 received Oxycodone at 4:37 PM and received Seroquel at 6:14 PM, 1 hour and 37 minutes apart in administration. -On 1/11/24 Resident 52 received Seroquel at 8:00 AM and received Oxycodone at 9:21 AM, 1 hour and 21 minutes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNAs received annual performance reviews for 2 of 5 randomly selected CNA staff (#s 25 and 26) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of care by competent staff. Findings include: A review of personnel records on 1/30/24 with Staff 35 (Staffing Manager) indicated the following employees had not received their annual performance evaluations: -Staff 25 (CNA), hire date 12/30/14: no annual performance review was completed. -Staff 26 (CNA), hire date 11/26/22: no annual performance review was completed. On 1/30/24 at 11:39 AM Staff 35 confirmed annual performance reviews for Staff 25 and Staff 26 were not completed. On 1/30/24 at 2:38 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she expected that annual CNA performance reviews would be completed by the end of the month of each staff member's hire date.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to administer a medication as ordered for 1 of 1 resident (# 164) reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: On 9/30/23, the Past Non-Compliance was corrected when the facility completed a root cause analysis of the incident and staff were trained on steps to take to ensure correct medication administration which included: -Nursing managers performing a review of new medication orders. -Follow-up on any needed clarification or corrections for new medication will be performed. -Random medication administration audits being performed weekly for four weeks and monthly for three months. -Audits results will be brought to the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee for review. Resident 164 was admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with diagnoses including respiratory failure with a lack of oxygen intake. Hospital discharge orders from 7/14/23 included instructions to administer hydromorphone 8 mg tablets every 6 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-16 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Direct Care Daily Staff Reports (DCSDR) were accurate for 7 of 42 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents and the public at risk for lack of awareness of nurse staffing levels. Finding include: A review of the DCSDR from 11/1/22 through 12/15/22 revealed 49 instances where the actual number of staff (RNs, CNAs and NAs) working was not recorded accurately. On 12/15/22 at 9:25 AM Staff 14 (Staffing Coordinator) stated she was not aware the DCSDR was to reflect the actual count of staff working on the floor as the DCSDR was completed the previous night for the whole day. Staff 14 confirmed the DCSDR was not updated at the beginning or during the shift to reflect accurate staffing count. On 12/15/22 at 2:47 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed the DCSDR did not reflect the actual count of the staff working on the floor.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a dignified manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#207) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for loss of dignity. Findings include: Resident 207 was admitted to the facility in 6/2021 with diagnoses including throat and lung cancer. A 7/9/22 Cognitive Loss/Dementia CAA indicated Resident 207 was able to make her/his needs known, required extensive assistance with her/his ADLs and had no vision or hearing problems. Resident 207 received end-of-life care and a decline was expected. A Facility Reported Incident dated 6/3/22 revealed the following: -On the evening of 6/3/22 at approximately 7:00 PM Staff 4 (CNA) witnessed Staff 5 (CNA) mock Resident 207 who requested coffee. Resident 207 had cancer and required removal of tissue from her/his mouth, tongue and throat. As a result, her/his speech was severely affected and she/he slurred her/his words and had poor enunciation. -Staff 4 indicated she overheard Staff 5 laugh and mock Resident 207 because of how many…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received showers for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#107) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for poor hygiene. Findings include: Resident 107 was admitted to the facility 2/1/21 with diagnoses including stomach ulcers. A 2/1/21 admission Nursing Database revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had impaired mobility, required extensive assistance of one staff for bathing and preferred showers. A 2/2021 CNA documentation form revealed the resident did not receive a shower from 2/1/22 through 2/8/21. Resident 107 discharged on 2/8/21. On 12/15/22 at 10:48 AM, 11:06 AM and 11:46 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated residents were offered two showers a week. Staff were to document the type of bathing provided or if bathing was refused. Staff 2 indicated there was no documentation to indicate Resident 107 was offered showers.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than five percent for 3 of 4 residents (#s 6, 16 and 25) reviewed for medication administration. The facility's medication error rate was 13%. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include: 1. Resident 25 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone). Resident 25's current physician's orders included: - levothyroxine sodium (thyroid hormone) 175 micrograms with instructions to take the medication on an empty stomach and do not take the medication within two hours of taking magnesium, calcium, iron, vitamins or omeprazole (treats acid reflux). Administer in addition to levothyroxine 13 micrograms. - levothyroxine sodium 13 micrograms. - multivitamin with minerals tablet, one tablet daily. - Glucerna (liquid dietary supplement) 237 ml daily in the morning. On 12/15/22 at 9:16 AM Staff 15 (LPN) was observed to administer levothyroxine 175 micrograms,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$185,923 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $149,783 — penalty dated 2025-04-28
  • $36,140 — penalty dated 2024-01-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA 1 of 5San Diego Post-Acute CenterEl Cajon, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLC — investment firm · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PORTLAND 5601 REALTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/01/2024
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/10/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/10/2024
EPP, BLAKEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2024
LARSON, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2024
NAZEM, JINANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2024
PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
PROVIDENCE GROUP INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2025
TRUIST BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2025
MURRAY, JASONIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 3%Other / private 31%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$540per resident / day
operating cost
$16,410per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$572per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385187. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next