Lakeview Post Acute
1201 Garden Plaza Drive, Florissant, MO 63033 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (314) 831-3752 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Dec 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0570)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (90) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $242,461 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-26)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (83%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.7% | 18.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.7% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 34.6% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 4.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.7% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.2% | 25.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.4% | 90.9% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.3% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.3% | 23.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 60.4% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.1% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.3% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.53 | 2.11 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.96 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 188 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 30.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.8%CMS range 37.8–55.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 8.4–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 30.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 88.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 5.0–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.05 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 103.2 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 83% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
90 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 74 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer prescribed antibiotics, as prescribed by the physician, for a wound infection, and the wounds further deteriorated; failed to notify the Primary Care Physician of the resident's increased bruising; failed to promptly identify hemorrhaging following the debridement (removal of dead or infected tissue) procedure completed on two wounds; and failed to monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding after wound debridement on a resident receiving an anticoagulant medication. On [DATE], the facility wound nurse accompanied the Wound Nurse Practitioner, who assessed the resident as needing a debridement procedure. The debridement was completed while the resident was receiving scheduled Xarelto (an anticoagulant medication which decreases the ability for blood to clot). The facility wound nurse failed to notify the Wound Nurse Practitioner of the dose of the Xarelto. No monitoring of the resident was implemented related to the increased risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-06-13 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure basic life support, including cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR), would be provided if such care was needed per the resident's choice, and would only be provided to a resident subject to related physician orders and resident choice. The facility failed to have a system to ensure each resident's code status is obtained timely upon admission, ensure code status matched the resident's wishes, and ensure each resident's code status was accurately documented. Resident #41 had both a full code and a do not resuscitate (DNR) code status sheet signed and dated the same day, a physician order for DNR, and, during an interview, the resident said he/she wanted to be a full code. Resident #66 had no order for code status, a DNR signed in his/her admission paperwork, and when interviewed said he/she would not want CPR performed. Resident #48 had no order for code status and a DNR signed in his/her admission paperwork. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing skin monitoring, physician notification, and timely treatment for one resident (Resident #1) who developed skin shearing (mechanical injury caused by the combination of friction and gravity, where the skin sticks to a surface, like bedding, causing deep tissue damage and blood vessel damage) and an unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage could not be determined due to slough (dead tissue) or eschar (necrotic tissue)) pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin that usually occur over a bony prominence as a result of pressure). In addition, facility staff failed to complete a skin assessment and provide wound care for one resident (Resident #2) who was admitted to the facility with a pressure ulcer. Four residents were sampled for wounds, and problems were identified with two. The census was 103.Review of the facility's Wound Care policy, revised October 2010, showed:-Purpose: The purpose of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY jw Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards by failing to obtain and administer a resident's medication for rheumatoid arthritis (RA, a chronic autoimmune disease that causes the body's immune system to attack its own tissue resulting in joint inflammation, pain and stiffness), who was on Medicare Part A (While a resident is on Medicare part A, the facility is required to cover the cost of room and board, nursing care, therapy, medical supplies and equipment, medications, transportation and social services at 100 % for the first 20 days, after that there is a co-pay) and failed to follow physician ordered wound treatments for a wound vac (A medical device that uses suction to help wounds heal), and failed to obtain orders for a wet to dry dressing (a type of wound dressing that involves applying a moist gauze to a wound and allowing it to dry) when staff were unable to obtain supplies for the wound vac for one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to turn and reposition a resident with existing pressure ulcers, failed to enter new orders, and failed to provide a pressure relieving mattress for one resident (Resident #4). The facility also failed to follow orders and complete wound assessments for one resident (Resident #13) and failed to complete skin assessments and document wound treatments for one resident (Resident #17). The sample size was three. The census was 80. Review of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide, Washington DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel 2014 showed the following: -Assess the pressure ulcer initially and re-assess it at least weekly; -With each dressing change, observed the pressure ulcer for signs that indicate a change in treatments as required (e.g., Wound improvement, wound deterioration, more or less exudate, signs of infection, or other complications); -Address the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, see the statement of deficiencies dated 11/14/23. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff routinely placed heel protectors and/or Podus Boots (multi-purpose boots designed to relieve pressure on the heels) for one resident (Resident #2) who was admitted with no pressure ulcers on the heels, and required maximum assistance to turn and reposition. On 11/30/23, the resident's heels were boggy/red and warm to touch. Facility staff failed to assess the heels and notify the physician about those changes. On 12/5/23, the resident developed deep tissue injuries (DTI, a pressure related injury that damages underlying layers of skin that may be painful, mushy, boggy, firm, and warm to touch) on both heels, causing a physical decline in the resident's ability to participate in physical therapy due to pain. The facility also failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #10) treatment order for a Stage 3 pressure injury/ulcer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper foot/wound care was performed for one resident (Resident #3) who had a wound to the great toe and a blister to the second toe. The resident's great toe wound became infected. The facility also failed to ensure the resident's second toe blister was documented on the resident's skin assessments. The sample was 10. The census was 95. Review of the facility's foot care policy, dated 10/2022, showed: -Policy statement: Residents receive appropriate care and treatment in order to maintain mobility and foot health; -Policy implementation: Residents are provided with foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice. Overall foot care includes the care and treatment of medical conditions to prevent foot complications from these conditions. Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/31/25, showed: -Diagnoses included: Epilepsy (seizure disorder), history of stroke, cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment when staff failed to provide hot water for bathing and personal care for residents. This affected six out of nine sampled residents (Residents #3, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9), five of six additional sampled resident rooms, and two of two shower rooms. The census was 92. Review of the facility's Water Temperatures Policy and Procedure, revised 12/2009, showed: -Policy Interpretation and Implementation; -Water heaters that service resident rooms, bathrooms, common areas, and tub/shower areas shall be set to temperatures of 98 degrees Fahrenheit (F) - 120 degrees F, or the minimum and maximum allowable temperature per state regulations; -Maintenance staff is responsible for checking thermostats and temperature controls in the facility and recording these checks in a maintenance log; -Maintenance staff shall conduct periodic tap water temperature checks and record the water temperatures in a safety log. 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure resident rooms (Resident #87, #25 and #64) were free from gnats (small, two winged fly that resembles a mosquito). This failure had the potential to affect all residents. The sample was five. The census was 77. Review of the facility's pest control policy dated May 2008, showed: Policy Statement: Our facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -The facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure the building is kept free of insects and rodents; -Pest control services are provided by the facility's vendor; -Windows are screened at all times; -Maintenance services assist when appropriate and necessary in providing pest control services. 1. Review of Resident #87's, admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/25/24, showed: -Cognitively intact;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet professional standards of practice and per the resident's plan of care when staff failed to apply wraps to Resident #13's legs, per physician orders. The sample was size was five. The census was 77. Review of the facility's Wound Care policy revised October 2010, showed: -Purpose: To provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing; -Preparation: -Verify there is a physician's order for this procedure; -Any problems or complaints made by the resident related to the procedure; -If the resident refused the treatment and the reason(s) why; -The signature and title of the person recording the data; -Reporting: -Notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the wound care; -Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. Review of Resident #13's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 12/17/24, showed: -No cognitive impairment; -Rejection of care: No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY TN: See edit below in red Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents, who were incontinent of bladder, received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff failed to check or clean one resident who was bed bound (Resident #25) and left one resident in his/her wheelchair surrounded by a large puddle of urine (Resident #64). In addition, staff failed to provide showers at least twice weekly for both residents. Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting policy, last revised in March 2018, showed: -Resident will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out ADLs; -Residents who are unable to carry ADLs independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene; -Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurately documented when staff documented treatments were provided when they were not (Residents #24, #87 and #13). The sample was 5. The census was 77. Review of the facility's Wound Care policy revised October 2010, showed: -Purpose: To provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing; -Preparation: -Verify there is a physician's order for this procedure; -Any problems or complaints made by the resident related to the procedure; -If the resident refused the treatment and the reason(s) why; -The signature and title of the person recording the data; -Reporting: -Notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the wound care; -Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. 1. Review of Resident #24's, quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/25/24, showed:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See deficiency cited at event id #ISJ412 This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, see the Statement of Deficiencies dated 10/21/24. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in working order, including visible notification at the nurses station for four of 23 sampled residents (Residents #32, #46, #64, and #60). The census was 89. Review of the facility's Call System, Residents policy, revised September 2022, showed: -Policy Statement: Residents are provided with a means to call staff for assistance through communication systems that directly calls a staff member or a centralized work station; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation; -Each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed, from toileting/bathing facilities and from the floor; -The resident call system remains functional at all times. If audible communication is used, the volume is maintained at an audible level that can be easily heard.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
See the SOD cited at F602, Event ID# ISJ412 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the diversion (the unauthorized removal) of Schedule II controlled medications (medication with higher potential of dependency and abuse) for one resident (Resident #194). The census was 89. The Director of Nursing (DON) was notified on 12/13/24, of the past non-compliance which began and ended on 11/12/24. The facility began an investigation, interviewed staff and the pharmacy delivery person, performed medication carts review on each hall, notified the police, in-serviced staff on abuse and misappropriation of resident property (including drug diversion), and terminated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A. Review of the facility's Identifying Exploitation, Theft and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy, revised April 2021, showed: -Policy Statement: As part of the abuse prevention strategy, volunteers, employees and contractors hired by this facility are expected to be able to recognize exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify a resident's responsible party (RP) after the resident eloped from the facility (Resident #38). The facility also failed to notify two residents' RPs after a change in condition (Resident #196 and #89). In addition, the facility failed to notify the RP after a transfer to the emergency room (Resident #243). The sample size was 33. The census was 99. Review of the facility's change in a resident's condition or status policy, revised November 2015, showed: -Policy statement: The facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, residents rights, etc.); -A significant change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that: a. will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) as required by state and federal regulations when one resident eloped from the facility and was found by police (Resident #38). In addition the facility failed to notify DHSS when allegations of abuse were made by two residents (Residents #52 and #48). The sample size was 33. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation -Reporting and Investigating Policy, dated revised September 2022, showed: - Reporting Allegations to the Administrator and Authorities: - If resident abuse (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish), neglect (the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress.), exploitation (taking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 74 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized care plans to address the specific needs of the residents. (Residents #38, #47, #344, #67, and #48). The sample was 33. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, dated 2001, showed: -Policy Statement: A comprehensive, person-centered plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment; Each resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan is consistent with the resident's rights to participate in the development and implementation of his or her pain of care, including the right to: -Receive the services and/or items included in the plan of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure physician orders for tracheostomy and ventilation machines (a machine that provides positive pressure ventilation) were compete with all pertinent information to care for residents and failed to have orders for continuous oxygen monitoring for residents with a tracheostomy (Residents #13, #25, and #245). Additionally, the facility failed to have staff trained on how to set and monitor the functioning of ventilation machines and continuous oxygen monitoring devices. Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy, revised October 2010, showed: -Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration; -Preparation: Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol; Assessment: Before administering oxygen, and while the resident is receiving oxygen therapy, assess for the following: -Signs or symptoms of cyanosis (i.e., blue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services by sufficient numbers of nursing personnel on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with resident care needs. The facility did not have a system in place to ensure the required coverage was provided. As a result one resident, who experienced acute shortness of breath had to call 911 for intervention. (Resident #35). Another resident called 911 on one occasion because he/she could not get staff to answer his/her call light to help reposition a tube and on another occasion because he/she had a soiled brief and had waited 10 hours for staff to clean him/her. (Resident #46). In addition, one resident, who was dependent on staff for nutrition, went over 5 hours without receiving his/her physician ordered tube feeding (a method of providing nutrition, fluids, and medication to someone who is unable to eat or drink safely by mouth). (Resident #245). In addition, during the survey, one resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their licensed staff were competent in their knowledge of the facility policy and procedures for how to provide tracheostomy (tube surgically inserted into the trachea for the purpose of breathing) care and suctioning to residents. In addition, the facility failed to train their licensed nursing staff on the use of the facility's continuous oxygen monitoring system, piped in oxygen system, and the wall suctioning equipment. This had the potential to affect the 15 residents at the facility who had a tracheostomy and required frequent suctioning and oxygen saturation monitoring. The facility census was 99. Review of the facility's Suction Policy, revised [DATE], showed: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to help prevent nosocomial (facility acquired) infections associated with suctioning and to prevent transmission of such infections to residents and staff; General Guidelines: -Wash hands before and after suctioning and before and after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of record for all controlled drugs (drug or chemical that is regulated by the government in terms of its manufacture, possession, and use) with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for two out of three medication carts reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents with controlled substance orders. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Controlled Substances Policy, dated November 2022, showed: -The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty make the count together and document and report any discrepancies to the director of nursing services. Review of the facility's Controlled Substance Shift Change Count-Check Sheet, dated 10/1/24 through 10/14/24, showed: -On the 100 hall: Oncoming shift, six out of 28 opportunities were blank and off going shift, nine out of 28 opportunities were blank; -On the 300-400 hall: Oncoming shift, three out of 28 opportunities were blank and off going shift, five out of 28 opportunities were blank. During an interview on 10/14/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and store medications according to acceptable standards of practice, when staff failed to lock the medication carts on one hall, date medications when opened, failed to store an unopened insulin pen in the refrigerator, and date an opened vial of a purified protein derivative (PPD, used to diagnose tuberculosis (TB) infection). For three of three medication carts reviewed and one of two medication storage rooms reviewed. The facility identified six medication/treatment carts and three medication rooms. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Medication Labeling and Storage Policy, dated 2001, showed: -Policy statement: The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature, humidity, and light controls. Only authorized personnel have access to keys; -Medications requiring refrigeration are stored in a refrigerator located in the medication room at the nurses' station or other secured location; -Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a complete and thorough facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility assessment did not address complete staffing needs to include respiratory therapists, restorative therapy, social services, and dietary service staff. In addition, the facility assessment failed to address staff competencies to meet the needs of residents. The census was 99. Review of the facility's undated Facility Assessment, showed: -No names and/or titles of staff involved in completing assessment; -Average daily census: 90; -Special treatments and conditions: -Oxygen therapy: 14-20 on average; -Suctioning: 7-10 on average; -Tracheostomy (an incision in the windpipe made to relieve an obstruction to breathing) care: 7-10 on average; -Ventilator (provides mechanical ventilation/breathing) or respirator (an apparatus used to induce artificial respiration): 1; -Bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP, non-invasive breathing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards when staff failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes and failed to wear appropriate personnel protective equipment (PPE) for four residents (Residents #243, #82, #73 and #52) who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs, bacteria or fungi resistant to multiple antimicrobials (an agent that kills microorganisms or stops their growth)); that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). In addition, the facility failed to assure a resident's Foley catheter (or indwelling catheter, a thin and hollow tube that's inserted into the bladder to drain urine) bag was off the floor for one resident (Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and/or provide vaccinations as indicated by the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. Two of five sampled residents (Residents #89 and #245), did not receive vaccines for influenza (a vaccine that can protect against the flu) and pneumococcal (a vaccine that can protect against pneumonia). In addition, these two residents, and another resident (Resident #47) did not receive the COVID-19 (an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 or corona virus) vaccines. Furthermore, these three sampled residents and another resident (Resident #68), four out of five residents, did not receive a completed purified protein derivative skin test (PPD skin test, a method for diagnosing latent tuberculosis (TB, a bacterial infection that can affect the lungs and other parts of the body)). The census was 99. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy (IPCP), revised October 2018, showed: -An IPCP is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all call lights in the facility were in working order including audible notification at the nurse station on the 100 and 200 halls. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Answering the Call Light Policy, dated October 2010, showed: -Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs; -Report all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor promptly. Observation on 10/10/24 at 6:13 A.M. showed Resident #20's call light was illuminated outside the resident's room with a red light light up on the wall inside the resident's room. There was no audible sound in the hall. During an interview on 10/10/24 at 5:05 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) P said call lights did not sound on the 100 and 200 halls, they just illuminated. The white light was for the room and a red light was the bathroom. Staff must look up to see which call lights were on. During an interview on 10/10/24 at 7:00 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) S said when a resident pushed the call light, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of one resident (Resident #9). Staff failed to intervene when the resident was sitting in the common area with his/her brief exposed. The sample was 33. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Dignity Policy, dated February 2021, showed: -Policy statement: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his/her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self -worth and self-esteem. -Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times. Review of Resident #9's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff, dated 7/14/24, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Upper and lower body dressing: Dependent, helper does all the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity; -Diagnoses included: heart failure, diabetes, other neurological conditions and aphasia (a language disorder that makes it difficult to understand, speak, read, or write). Review of the care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide reasonable accommodations of individual needs and preferences by failing to ensure call lights were within reach for three sampled residents (Residents #51, #41 and #58). Staff also failed to ensure residents with limited mobility needs and preferences were met when staff did not honor one resident's preference to have his/her head turned (Resident #58). The sample was 33. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Answering the Call Light policy, revised 10/2010, showed: -Purpose: To respond to the resident's requests and needs; -General Guidelines: -Explain the call light to the new resident; -Demonstrate the use of the call light; -Ask the resident to return the demonstration so that you will be sure that the resident can operate the system (Note: Explain to the resident that a call light system was also located in his/her bathroom. Demonstrate how it works); -Be sure that the call light is plugged in at all times; -When the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate one allegation of staff to resident abuse (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish) (Resident #52). The sample size was 33. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation -Reporting and Investigating Policy, revised September 2022, showed: -Policy Statement: All reports of resident abuse, are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported; -Investigation Allegations: -All allegations are thoroughly investigated. The Administrator initiates investigations; -Investigations may be assigned to an individual trained in reviewing, investigating, and reporting such allegations; -The Administrator provides supporting documents and evidence related to the alleged incident to the individual in charge of the investigation; -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services in accordance with acceptable standards of practice when the facility failed to obtain one resident's labs per physician orders (Resident #27) and when staff failed to complete neurological checks (neuro-checks, an assessment completed by nursing staff to monitor for changes in the resident's neurological status for the entire 72 hours for one resident (Resident #52). The sample was 33. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Lab and Diagnostic Test Results-Clinical Protocol Policy, dated November 2018, showed: -The physician will identify, and order diagnostic and lab testing based on the resident's diagnostic and monitoring needs; -The staff will process test requisitions and arrange for test; -The laboratory, diagnostic radiology provider, other testing source will report test results to the facility. Review of the facility's Neurological Assessment (Routine) Policy, dated October 2023, showed: -Purpose: the purpose of this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable nursing standards when the facility failed to enter one resident's (Resident #343) treatment order into the computer for nine days resulting in the wound treatment not being administered per physician orders. In addition, one resident was observed to not have an ordered treatment in place (Resident #89). The sample was 33. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Wound Care Policy, revised [DATE], showed: -Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing; -Preparation: -Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure; -Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident; -Documentation: The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record; -The type of wound care given; -The date and time the wound care was given; -The position in which the resident was placed; -The name and title of the individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety and adequate monitoring for one resident (Resident #38), whom the facility identified as an elopement risk, and failed to prevent the resident from eloping from the facility. The facility failed to document the elopement in the resident's medical record and in the resident's plan of care. The sample size was 33. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Elopement policy, revised December 2007, showed; -Policy Statement: -Staff shall investigate and report all cases of missing residents; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation; -Staff shall promptly report any resident who tries to leave the premises or is suspected of being missing to the Charge Nurse or Director of Nursing. -When a departing individual returns to the facility, the Director of Nursing Services or Charge Nurse shall: -Examine the resident for injuries; -Notify the Attending Physician; -Notify the resident's legal representative (sponsor) of the incident;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate administration of enteral (passing through the intestine) nutrition for a resident who was dependent on a gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a tube inserted through the abdomen that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) (Resident #245). The resident did not receive the continuous order of the tube feeding for approximately five hours. The facility identified 19 residents who received tube feedings. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Enteral Nutrition Policy, revised in November 2018, showed: -Policy Statement: Adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition is provided to residents as ordered; -The interdisciplinary team, including the dietitian, conducts a full nutritional assessment within current initial assessment timeframes to determine the clinical necessity of enteral feedings; -Enteral nutrition is ordered by the provider based on the recommendations of the dietitian. If a feeding tube is ordered, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving dialysis (the clinical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) had documented assessments and monitoring related to dialysis and ongoing documented communication with the dialysis center. The facility identified 10 residents as receiving dialysis, of which one was sampled (Residents #89). The sample was 33. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Care of a Resident with End-Stage Renal Disease, Policy, dated September 2010, showed: -Policy Statement: residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD, kidneys no longer work as they should to meet the body's needs) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care; -Policy interpretation and implementation: -Staff caring for residents with ESRD, including residents receiving dialysis care outside the facility, shall be trained in the care and special needs of these residents; -Education and training of staff includes, specifically: -The type of assessment data that is to be gathered about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the monthly drug regimen review (DRR) recommendations were followed timely. The requirements associated with the medication regimen review (MRR) apply to all residents, whether short or long stay. The facility failed to complete the timelines and responsibilities for the MRR by the consultant pharmacist when they failed to address MRR irregularities for two residents investigated for the MRR (Residents #48 and #14). The facility census was 99. Review of the facility's Pharmacy Services Role of the Consultant Pharmacist, dated 2001, showed: -The consultant pharmacist will provide specific activities related to medication regimen review including: -A documented review of the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly, or more frequently under certain conditions, based on applicable federal and state guidelines; -Appropriate communication of information to prescribers and facility leadership about potential or actual problems related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow through with the pharmacist's recommendations regarding gradual dose reductions and documentation of behavior monitoring, side effects and related diagnoses for the use of the antipsychotic medications, for two residents (Resident #48 and #68). The sample was 33. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Pharmacy Services Role of the Consultant Pharmacist, dated 2001, showed: -The consultant pharmacist will provide specific activities related to medication regimen review including: -A documented review of the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly, or more frequently under certain conditions, based on applicable federal and state guidelines; -Appropriate communication of information to prescribers and facility leadership about potential or actual problems related to any aspect of medications and pharmacy services, including medication irregularities, and pertinent resident-specific documentation in the medical record, as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when staff failed to administer medications per physician orders for three residents (Residents #246, #47 and #195). The sample was 33. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Administering Medications Policy, dated revision April 2019, showed: -Policy statement: medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame; -If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall initial and circle the medication administration record (MAR) space provided for that drug and dose; -The individual administering the medication initials the resident's MAR on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones; -As required or indicated for a medication,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed routine inspections of bed/side rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify possible areas of entrapment to reduce the risk of accidents for three residents (Residents #47, #27 and #344). The sample was 33. The census was 99. Review of the FDA (Federal Drug Administration) guidance, Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, dated 3/10/06, showed: -It is suggested that facilities and manufacturers determine the level of risk for entrapment and take steps to mitigate the risk. Evaluating the dimensional limits of the gaps in hospital beds is one component of an overall assessment and mitigation strategy to reduce entrapment; -The population most vulnerable to entrapment are elderly patients and residents, especially those who are frail, confused, restless, or who have uncontrolled body movement; -Bed rails (commonly used synonymous terms are side rails, bed side rails,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders and complete tracheostomy (the presence of a surgical airway placed in the neck to help oxygen reach the lungs) treatment orders for one of four sampled residents (Resident #12) requiring tracheostomy care and maintenance. The census was 106. Review of the facility's Tracheostomy Care Policy, revised 10/2023, showed: -The following must be documented in the resident's record: -The procedure completed; -The condition of the stoma and surrounding skin; -The resident's tolerance of the procedure; -Any provider notification of unexpected or abnormal findings. Review of Resident #12's medical record, showed: -Diagnoses included anoxic brain damage (damage to the cerebrum caused by a lack of oxygenated blood to the brain), bronchiectasis (a chronic pulmonary disease causing the airways to be inflamed and prone to infection) and tracheostomy status. -The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
See Event ID 97R513. This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, refer to the Statement of Deficiencies dated 4/15/24. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy by failing to develop comprehensive, person-centered care plans. Resident #40 had been identified for a three month significant weight loss, but his/her care plan had not been updated to include double portions at meals or adaptive devices (special eating equipment and utensils) at meals. Resident #41 had a care plan for malnutrition, but it did not include all of his/her adaptive devices or his/her preference to have finger foods. Resident #42 had a diagnosis of malnutrition, had been identified with a six month significant weight loss, but the care plan did not address the resident's nutritional needs. Eleven resident care plans were reviewed and problems were identified with three. The census was 94.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0810 — patternProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
See Event ID 97R513 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adaptive equipment at meals as ordered, to assist with resident eating independence and increase food/fluid intake. Four residents with orders for adaptive eating equipment were sampled and problems were found with three (Residents #39, #40 and #41). The census was 94.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
See Event ID 97R513 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff checked residents for incontinence at least every two to three hours. This resulted in residents left urine saturated for extended periods of time. Seven residents were sampled and problems were identified with two (Residents #37 and #5). The census was 94.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
See Event ID 97R513 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were completed as ordered. Residents #31 and #28 had physician ordered wound treatments to be completed daily. On Saturday 5/4/24 and Sunday 5/5/24, neither resident had there wound treatments completed. Two residents with wounds were sampled and problems were found with both. The census was 94.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
See Event ID 97R513 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received their pressure ulcer (an injury to the skin and the tissue below the skin due to pressure on the skin) treatments as ordered, and failed to accurately document missed treatments. The facility also failed to update one resident's care plan regarding the presence of a pressure ulcer. Five residents with pressure ulcers were sampled and problems were found with two (Residents #29 and #30). The census was 94.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
See Event ID 97R513 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and failed to implement and/or promptly implement the Registered Dietician's (RD) dietary recommendations for residents that experienced severe three month weight loss (greater that 7.5%) and severe six month weight loss (greater than 10%), and failed to ensure residents' heights were readily available to the RD so resident's body mass index (BMI, used to determine if a person is underweight or overweight) and ideal body weights (IBW, the ideal weight for men/women based on height and weight) could be calculated. The facility also failed to develop care plan interventions for residents experiencing severe weight loss. In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents received adaptive utensils, plate guards, and cups as ordered during meals. Four residents with severe weight loss were sampled and problems were found with three (Residents #39, #40 and #42). The census was 94.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See Event ID 97R512 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan that identified interventions to prevent falls after one resident's Fall Risk Assessment completed on [DATE], identified the resident to be a high risk to fall. In addition, on [DATE], the facility developed a care plan identifying the resident as having cognitive impairment and exhibited cognitive loss related to impaired decision making skills and impulsivity with a goal of avoiding complications that included falls and injuries. On [DATE], the resident was placed in his/her room in a wheelchair with no supervision. The resident leaned forward in the wheelchair reaching for a blanket on his/her bed causing the resident to fall out of the wheelchair onto the floor with the wheelchair resting against his/her back and his/her left leg was caught underneath the wheelchair. After staff assisted the resident back into the wheelchair, the resident had a seizure and then went into cardiac arrest (the heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently provided residents with two showers per week as scheduled. Of the 9 residents sampled, problems were identified with 8 (Residents #3, #2, #1, #7, #5, #9, #10 and #11). Seven of those 8 were interviewed, and they all said they preferred to have their showers as scheduled. One resident (Resident #2) was not interviewable, but his/her shower record showed he/she did not receive his/her showers as scheduled. The census was 90. Review of the Facility Assessment (an assessment used to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently), dated 9/20/23, and completed by the Administrator, Director of Nurses (DON), Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON), Director of Rehabilitation, Maintenance Supervisor, Dietary Supervisor, and Medical Director, showed: -Average daily census: 90; -Residents independent for dressing, bathing, transfers, eating, toileting: 5; -Residents requiring assist of 1-2 staff for dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan that identified interventions to prevent falls after one resident's Fall Risk Assessment completed on [DATE], identified the resident to be a high risk to fall. In addition, on [DATE], the facility developed a care plan identifying the resident as having cognitive impairment and exhibited cognitive loss related to impaired decision making skills and impulsivity with a goal of avoiding complications that included falls and injuries. On [DATE], the resident was placed in his/her room in a wheelchair with no supervision. The resident leaned forward in the wheelchair reaching for a blanket on his/her bed causing the resident to fall out of the wheelchair onto the floor with the wheelchair resting against his/her back and his/her left leg was caught underneath the wheelchair. After staff assisted the resident back into the wheelchair, the resident had a seizure and then went into cardiac arrest (the heart suddenly stops…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report one resident's (Resident #1) excoriated buttocks identified upon admission to the physician for a treatment order and failed to monitor the excoriation until 2/15/24, when a nurse identified two abrasions on the buttocks, the physician was notified, and a treatment order was started. On 2/16/24, a nurse documented the resident had what appeared to be a stage 2 pressure ulcer (Partial thickness loss of dermis (skin) presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (yellow or white tissue that adheres to the ulcer bed in strings or thick clumps, or is mucinous) on the buttocks and a new order for Santyl (an ointment used to aid in wound healing by removing dead skin tissue) and a consult with the wound care company was ordered by the Nurse Practitioner (NP). The facility also failed to ensure one resident (Resident #3) with known pressure ulcers on the right foot wore bilateral heel protectors (pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently ensure a ratio of no more than 12 residents assigned per Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on the day shift per the Facility Assessment (used to determine what resources are needed to provide adequate care, including staffing) necessary to meet the needs of the residents including their activities of daily living (ADLS, dressing, bathing, transfers, eating, and toileting). Eight residents were sampled (Resident #3, #2, #1, #7, #5, #9, #10 and #11) and all 8 did not receive showers as scheduled, and one (Resident #3) with pressure ulcers (also known as bedsores are localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue) was unclean and turned and repositioned timely. The census was 90. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 9/20/23, and completed by the Administrator, Director of Nurses (DON), Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON), Director of Rehabilitation, Maintenance Supervisor, Dietary Supervisor, and Medical Director,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had comfortable water temperatures for bathing. Residents #14, #15, #16 and #17 complained the facility water temperatures for the sinks and showers in their rooms were too cold to comfortably take showers and/or bed baths. Review of the facility's water temperature logs from October 6, 2023 through February 26, 2024, showed water temperatures in multiple resident rooms as well as community shower rooms were below the acceptable threshold of 105 Fahrenheit (F) to 120 F. In addition, water temperatures in the sampled residents' rooms on 3/6/24, showed the water temperatures remained below the acceptable water temperature range. The census was 90. Review of the facility Water Temperatures, Safety policy, dated 2002 and revised on 2009, showed: -Policy Statement: Tap water in the facility shall be kept within a temperature range to prevent scalding of residents; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -Water heaters that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff checked residents for incontinence at least every two to three hours. This resulted in residents left urine saturated for extended periods of time. Seven residents were sampled and problems were identified with two (Residents #37 and #5). The census was 94. 1. Review of Resident #37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/9/24, showed: -Vision: Impaired - sees fine detail, including regular print in newspapers/books; -Hearing: Adequate; -Speech Clarity: Unclear speech - slurred or mumbled words; -Makes Self Understood: Usually understood - difficulty communicating some words or finishing thoughts but is able if prompted or given time; -Ability to Understand Others: Usually understands - misses some part/intent of message but comprehends most conversation; -Cognitively intact; -Rejection of Care: Behavior not exhibited; -Functional Limitation in Range…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were completed as ordered. Residents #31 and #28 had physician ordered wound treatments to be completed daily. On Saturday 5/4/24 and Sunday 5/5/24, neither resident had there wound treatments completed. Two residents with wounds were sampled and problems were found with both. The census was 94. Review of the facility Wound Care policy, undated, showed: -Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing; -Documentation: The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: -The type of wound care given; -The date and time the wound care was given; -The name and title of the individual performing the wound care; -Any change in the resident's condition; -If the resident refused the treatment and the reason why; -The signature and title of the person recording the data; -Reporting: -Notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and failed to implement and/or promptly implement the Registered Dietician's (RD) dietary recommendations for residents that experienced severe three month weight loss (greater that 7.5%) and severe six month weight loss (greater than 10%), and failed to ensure residents' heights were readily available to the RD so resident's body mass index (BMI, used to determine if a person is underweight or overweight) and ideal body weights (IBW, the ideal weight for men/women based on height and weight) could be calculated. The facility also failed to develop care plan interventions for residents experiencing severe weight loss. In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents received adaptive utensils, plate guards, and cups as ordered during meals. Four residents with severe weight loss were sampled and problems were found with three (Residents #39, #40 and #42). The census was 94. Review of the facility Weight Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurses received training for one resident's non-invasive mechanical ventilator (a machine that provides respiratory support), and failed to ensure nurses were aware the facility had back-up ventilators to use. The resident said his/her ventilator had repeatedly alarmed during the course of two or three nights, and facility nurses did not know why it was alarming or how to fix it. He/She eventually turned the ventilator off because the alarms prevented him/her from sleeping. In addition, the facility failed to obtain orders for the use of the non-invasive mechanical ventilator. The facility identified one resident with a non-invasive mechanical ventilator. (Resident #14). The census was 90. Review of the ventilator manufacturer's instruction manual provided by the facility, showed: -Possible Alarm Causes and Actions: -Low minute ventilation alarm, low inspiratory pressure alarm, low expiratory pressure alarm, circuit disconnection alarm may indicate a leak/disconnection: Accidental decannulation (the trach tube comes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adaptive equipment at meals as ordered, to assist with resident eating independence and increase food/fluid intake. Four residents with orders for adaptive eating equipment were sampled and problems were found with three (Residents #39, #40 and #41). The census was 94. Review of the facility Assistance with Meals policy, undated, included: Policy Statement: Residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident; Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Residents Who May Benefit from Assistive Devices: 1. Adaptive devices (special eating equipment and utensils) will be provided for residents who need or request them. These may include devices such as silverware with enlarged/padded handles, plate guards, and/or specialized cups; 2. Assistance will be provided to ensure that residents can use and benefit from special eating equipment and utensils; 3. Resident may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See the citationwritten at Event ID CF2112. This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, see the statement of deficiencies dated 11/14/23. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff routinely placed heel protectors and/or Podus Boots (multi-purpose boots designed to relieve pressure on the heels) for one resident (Resident #2) who was admitted with no pressure ulcers on the heels, and required maximum assistance to turn and reposition. On 11/30/23, the resident's heels were boggy/red and warm to touch. Facility staff failed to assess the heels and notify the physician about those changes. On 12/5/23, the resident developed deep tissue injuries (DTI, a pressure related injury that damages underlying layers of skin that may be painful, mushy, boggy, firm, and warm to touch) on both heels, causing a physical decline in the resident's ability to participate in physical therapy due to pain. The facility also failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #10)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See the citation written at Event ID CF2112. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided residents with showers in accordance with their preferences and needs. Of the nine residents sampled, five (Residents #23, #25, #27, #28 and #29) said they preferred to have showers, but did not receive their two scheduled showers per week. One additional resident was selected as a closed record and problems were identified (Resident #14). The census was 80. Review of the facility Bath, Shower/Tub policy, undated, included the following: -Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin; -Documentation: -The date and time the shower/tub bath was performed; -The name and title of the individual(s) who assisted the resident with the shower/tub bath; -All assessment data obtained during the shower/tub bath; -If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason(s) why and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Seethe citation written at Event ID CF2112. This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, see the statement of deficiencies dated 11/14/23. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment order changes were made timely and accurately on the Physician's Order Sheet (POS) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR), ensuring residents received wound treatments as ordered. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff documented wound treatments as being completed on the TAR or provide an explanation as to why a treatment could not be completed on the TAR or in the progress notes. The facility identified five residents with wounds, four were sampled and problems were identified with two (Residents #17 and #10). The census was 80. Review of the facility Wound Care policy, undated, included the following: -Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing; -Preparation: -Verify that there is a physician's order for this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
See the citation written at Event ID CF2112. This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, see the statement of deficiencies dated 8/24/23. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff transferred one resident (Resident #1) using a Hoyer lift (a machine used to transfer a resident unable to bear weight), resulting in the resident falling from a sit-to-stand lift (a machine used to transfer a resident that is capable of standing and bearing weight) during two transfers. The facility investigated the falls, but failed to identify all the causes of the falls, and failed to ensure staff were inserviced based on those problems. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff were observed for competency in using mechanical lifts prior to being allowed to using them, per facility policy. The facility identified six residents who required sit-to-stand transfers. All six were sampled and problems were found with one (Resident #1). The census was 80. Review of the facility Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents policy, undated, included the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's responsible party after a change of condition for one resident (Resident #2). The sample was three. The census was 80. Review of the facility's change in a resident's condition or status policy, undated, showed: -Policy statement: The facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, residents rights, etc.); -A significant change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that: a. will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease- related clinical interventions (is not self-limiting); b. impacts more than one area of the resident's health status; c. requires interdisciplinary review and/or revision to the care plan; and d. ultimately is based on the judgment of the clinical staff and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving possible abuse or neglect were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made to the State Survey Agency, for one resident who sustained an injury of unknown origin, a fractured rib (Resident #17). The sample was 3. The census was 80. Review of the facility's abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation - reporting and investigating policy, undated, showed: - All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported; -The Administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the following persons or agencies: a. The state licensing/certification…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for one resident (Resident #18) and at the time of therapeutic leave for one resident (Resident #6). The sample was 3. The census was 80. Review of the facility's bed hold and returns policy, undated, showed: -All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice about these policies at least twice: 1: well in advance of any transfer (e.g., in the admission packet); and 2: at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours). 1. Review of Resident #18's medical record, showed: -admitted on [DATE]; -discharged to the hospital on [DATE]; -No documentation of notice of bed hold policy provided.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for residents receiving enteral feeding (tube feeding) by not following physician orders for two residents (Residents #4 and #15) and by not documenting accurately in the medication administration record (MAR) for one resident (Resident #4). The sample size was three. The census was 80. Review of the facility's enteral nutrition policy, undated, showed: -Policy Statement: Adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition is provided to residents as ordered; -The interdisciplinary team, including the dietitian, conducts a full nutritional assessment within current initial assessment timeframes to determine the clinical necessity of enteral feedings. The assessment includes: Evaluation of the resident's current clinical and nutritional status; Relevant functional and psychosocial factors; and a review of interventions to maintain oral intake prior to the use of a feeding tube and the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice for one resident (Resident #4) when staff did not respond when the resident cried out for help and did not leave the call light within the resident's reach for future requests or needs. The census was 79. Review of the Residents' Rights information, provided to residents upon admission, showed: -Policy statement: Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity; -Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all resident of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: -Self-determination; -A dignified existence; -To be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity; -Exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility and as a resident or citizen of the United States; -Be supported by the facility in exercising his or her rights; -Copies of the facility's Resident Rights are posted throughout the facility, and a copy is provided to each employee, provider and contracted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided residents with showers in accordance with their preferences and needs. Of the nine residents sampled, five (Residents #23, #25, #27, #28 and #29) said they preferred to have showers, but did not receive their two scheduled showers per week. One additional resident was selected as a closed record and problems were identified (Resident #14). The census was 80. Review of the facility Bath, Shower/Tub policy, undated, included the following: -Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin; -Documentation: -The date and time the shower/tub bath was performed; -The name and title of the individual(s) who assisted the resident with the shower/tub bath; -All assessment data obtained during the shower/tub bath; -If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason(s) why and the intervention taken; -The signature and title of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, see the statement of deficiencies dated 11/14/23. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment order changes were made timely and accurately on the Physician's Order Sheet (POS) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR), ensuring residents received wound treatments as ordered. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff documented wound treatments as being completed on the TAR or provide an explanation as to why a treatment could not be completed on the TAR or in the progress notes. The facility identified five residents with wounds, four were sampled and problems were identified with two (Residents #17 and #10). The census was 80. Review of the facility Wound Care policy, undated, included the following: -Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing; -Preparation: -Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure; -Review the resident's care plan to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had a system in place to provide adequate supervision for residents. Facility staff failed to provide protective oversight for one resident (Resident #1) with a history of a cerebrovascular accident (CVA, stroke), limited ability to verbally express him/herself, and assessed as at risk for elopement, when the resident left the facility during the night shift without staff's knowledge, and walked approximately 7.6 miles to his/her family home. Nursing staff documented the resident was in the building- sleeping, walking, and in the dining room- when the resident was not in the facility. The facility did not have a system in place to ensure agency nursing staff received training on facilty policies and procedures related to supervision and documentation. The facility also failed to follow their elopement policy in thoroughly investigating the elopement.The sample was 3. The census was 75. Review of the facility's Signing Residents Out Policy, revised August 2006, showed: -All residents leaving the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances when the facility did not file the grievance and/or the resolution timely for two residents (Resident #123 and #48). The facility failed to make information on how to file a grievance available to the residents, notify residents individually or through postings in prominent locations throughout the facility of the right to file grievances orally or in writing, the right to file grievances anonymously, and the contact information of the Grievance Official with whom a grievance can be filed. In addition, the facility failed to establish a grievance policy that identified the Grievance Official and directed the facility to maintain documentation of the grievances filed for a minimum of three years. The sample was 20. The census was 73. 1. Review of the facility's undated Grievance Policy, showed: -Residents and their families have the right to file a complaint without fear of reprisal; -Residents'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse and neglect policy for employee screening. The facility failed to check new employees' criminal background prior to employment for six of eight employees, and failed to check for a federal indicator (identifies when a staff person who has ever held a certified nursing assistant (CNA) certificate, has ever been found to have abused, neglected, or misappropriated resident property) through the state nurse aide registry, for four of eight employee files reviewed. The census was 73. Review of the facility's Background Screening Investigations policy, dated March 2019, showed: -Our facility conducts employment background screening checks, reference checks and criminal conviction investigation checks on all applicants for positions with direct access to residents; -Background checks and criminal checks are initiated within two days of an offer of employment or contract agreement, and completed prior to employment; -For any individual applying for a position as a CNA, the state nurse aide registry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice when a routine pain medication was given outside of administration parameters (Resident #123). In addition, staff failed to document wound treatments as completed for four residents (Residents #47, #58, #8 and #2). The sample was 20. The census was 73. Review of the facility's Administering Medications policy, dated April 2019, showed: -Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -Medications are administered in accordance with prescribed orders, including any required time frames; -Medications are administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified; -Topical medications used in treatments are recorded in the treatment administration record (TAR). Review of the facility's Documentation of Medication Administration policy, dated November 2022, showed: -A medication administration record is used to document all medications administered; -Administration of medication is documented immediately after it is given. 1. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Controlled Substance (a drug that may be abused or cause addiction) policy when staff failed to count controlled substances inventory at each shift change for three out of three sampled narcotic books. The sample was 20. The census was 73. Review of the facility's Controlled Substance policy, revised November 2022, showed: -Policy: The facility complies with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal and documentation of controlled medications; -Nursing staff count controlled medication inventory at the end of each shift, using these records to reconcile the inventory count; -The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty make the count together and document and report any discrepancies to the Director of Nursing (DON) services. 1. Review of the controlled substance shift change count-check sheet, in the 200 hall narcotic book, showed: -April, 2023: -Eight out of 60 opportunities, with no on-coming staff initials; -11 of 60 opportunities, with no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to date insulin flexpens (prefilled injectable insulin) when opened and/or failed to store insulin flexpens in the refrigerator until opened. Staff also failed to label one opened multi dose vial of insulin with the resident's name, on one of the four medication carts checked. The census was 73. Review of the Facility's Medication Labeling and Storage Policy, revised February 2023, showed: -Medications and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medication between containers; -Medications requiring refrigeration are stored in a refrigerator located in the medication room at the nurse's station or other secured location; -The medication label includes, at minimum: a residents name; -Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (example given, needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial; -If medication containers have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to take food temperatures to ensure food served at time of service measured at least 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for hot food. This deficient practice affected all residents who ate meals at the facility. The sample was 20. The census was 73. 1. Review of Resident #63's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/13/23, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Required set up with eating. During an interview on 6/7/23 at 10:12 A.M., the resident said the food was cold, especially the eggs. 2. Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Moderately impaired cognition; -Required set up for eating. During an interview on 6/7/23 at 5:06 P.M., the resident said the food served in the dining room was hot but when he/she ate in his/her room, the food was usually cold. 3. Review of Resident #1's annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Moderately impaired cognition; -Required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system for identifying communicable diseases for all staff by not following their policy for tuberculosis (TB) testing for six of eight employee files reviewed and failed to follow proper infection control practices for two of four residents investigated for indwelling urinary catheters (Residents #51 and #55). The census was 73. 1. Review of the facility's Tuberculosis, Employee Screening policy, dated March 2021, showed: -All employees are screened for latent TB and active TB disease, using the tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) and symptom screening prior to beginning employment; -Each newly hired employee is screened for TB disease after an employment offer has been made but prior to the employee's duty assignment; -The policy failed to direct staff to obtain a second step TB test upon hire if the TST test was used. Review of Staff EEE's employee file: -Date of hire 3/23/23; -No TB testing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 33 opportunities observed, two errors occurred, resulting in a 6.06% error rate (Resident #124). The census was 73. Review of the facility's Administering Medications policy, dated April 2019, showed: -Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -Medications are administered in accordance with prescribed orders, including any required time frame. Review of Resident #124's electronic physician order sheet, showed: -An order dated 5/31/23, for amlodipine besylate (used to treat high blood pressure) 5 milligram (mg) one time a day; -An order dated 6/6/23, for prednisone (steroid) 20 mg two tablets one time a day for seven days. During a medication administration observation on 6/7/23 at 10:42 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Supervisor F administered the resident's medications. He/she administered prednisone 20 mg one tablet. He/she did not administer the ordered amlodipine besylate 5 mg. Review of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-11-22 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident trust was reconciled monthly for 12 of 12 months. This had the potential to affect all residents who had money in the trust account. The census was 77. Review of the resident trust account, showed the following -November 2018, the trust reconciliation statement, showed the total of resident balances equaled $14,432.85. The reconciliation did not show any pending deposits, pending debits, or how the available petty cash was figured into the reconciliation; -December 2018, the trust reconciliation statement, showed the total of resident balances equaled $9228.35. The reconciliation did not show any pending deposits, pending debits, or how the available petty cash was figured into the reconciliation; -January 2019, the trust reconciliation, showed the total of resident balances equaled $11,196.78. The reconciliation did not show any pending deposits, pending debits, or how the available petty cash was figured into the reconciliation; -February 2019, the trust reconciliation, showed the total of resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-11-22 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they maintained a bond that was equal to or greater than one and one-half times the average monthly balance for the residents' personal funds for the last 12 consecutive months from November 2018 through October 2019. This has the potential to affect all residents who had money in the trust account. The census was 77. Record review on 11/21/19 of the residents' personal funds account for the last 12 consecutive months from November 2018 to October 2019, showed the following: -The facility could not provide reconciled bank statements for the last 12 months; -The facility's current approved bond amount equaled $20,000.00; -The average monthly balance for the residents' personal funds equaled $13,604.05, (which could only be determined by using the ending bank balance plus the petty cash); -An average monthly balance of $13,604.95 ($14,000, when rounded to the nearest $1,000) required a bond of at least $21,000.00 ; -The current balance in the residents' trust as of 11/21/19 was $24,171.11. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-11-22 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN - form CMS-10055) or a denial letter at the initiation, reduction, or termination of Medicare Part A benefits for two sampled residents (Residents #52 and #55) who remained in the facility and one sampled resident (Resident #222) who went home, upon discharge from Medicare Part A services. The facility census was 77. 1. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C -09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following: -The Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC - form CMS-10123) is issued when all covered Medicare services end for coverage reasons; -If the skilled nursing facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order to self-administer medication, document urinary output, clarify the diagnosis for an anti-seizure medication, administer a nutritional supplement as ordered, discontinue an order to be up at meals only, administer an anti-anxiety medication as ordered and carry over an order for a hand splint, for seven of 18 sampled residents (Residents #18, #30, #13, #31, #47, #16 and #8). The census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/9/19, showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Diagnoses included diabetes, hemiplegia (paralysis to one side of the body) and communication deficit. Review of the physician's order sheet (POS), showed the following: -An order, dated 5/10/19, to administer Flonase (allergy relief) nasal spray one spray in to each nostril twice a day; -No order for self administration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper perineal care (peri-care, cleansing of the surface area between the thighs, extending from the pubic bone to the tail bone) for two of three residents observed (Residents #16 and #25) and failed to provide appropriate oral care to one resident (Resident #16). The sample size was 18. The census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/7/19, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Extensive assistance required for all personal care; -Frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Diagnosis of dementia. Observation on 11/19/19 at 5:33 A.M., showed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) L entered the resident's room, donned gloves and wet disposable no rinse wipes with warm water. He/she released the wet with urine brief, turned the resident to his/her left side, discarded the soiled brief and cleansed the resident's inner…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, facility policy and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, by failing to assess and treat pain, wounds and eye irritation for three of 18 sampled residents (Residents #64, #11 and #39). The census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #64's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/5/19, showed the following: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Extensive assistance required for personal hygiene; -Special treatments/programs: Hospice care; -Pain presence: YES; -Pain frequency: Frequent; -Pain intensity: Moderate; -As needed (PRN) pain medications: YES; -Non medication interventions: NO; -Diagnoses included arthritis, falls and muscle weakness. Review of the care plan, dated 8/9/19 and last updated 11/4/19, showed the following: -Problem: Resident expresses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate and safe transfer techniques were used in the care of residents (Resident #31, #48, #43 and #1) during four of four transfers observed. The facility also failed to prevent resident access to razors, iodine and nail clippers in two common areas. Furthermore, staff failed to properly dispose of used razors when two razors remained on a resident's night stand for three days (Resident #47). This had the potential to affect all residents who were able to move freely around the facility. The census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/5/19, showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Unable to ambulate; -Dependent on staff for transfers; -Required extensive assistance with bed mobility, toileting, eating and all personal care; -Diagnoses included heart disease, kidney disease, chronic lung disease, aphasia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-11-22 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly assess and monitor residents for the use of bed/side rails, obtain physician's orders for the use of the bed rails, attempt to use alternative measures prior to installing a bed/side rail and failed to address the use of bed/side rails on the care plan for 12 of 18 sampled residents (Residents #21, #47, #64, #58, #30, #27, #8, #13, #42, #39, #37 and #10). The census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/30/19, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toileting and personal hygiene; -Diagnoses included heart failure, high blood pressure, Alzheimer's disease, stroke and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body); -Bed rails not in use. Review of the resident's medical record, showed the following: -No evaluation or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to cover plates and desserts when serving meals to residents in the main dining room. Facility staff also failed to cover food stored in the walk in cooler and failed to properly store dishes to prevent contamination. The census was 77. 1. Observation of the main dining room on 11/18/19 at 12:19 P.M. and 5:33 P.M., showed facility staff brought uncovered plates of food out of the kitchen, through the corridor connecting 100 Hall to 200, 300 and 400 halls. While staff were serving, other facility staff, visitors and vendors walked through the main dining room and corridor. Observation of the kitchen on 11/20/19 from 8:00 A.M. to 8:10 A.M., showed the cook plated breakfast food from the steam table and then handed the plates to staff. Facility staff then delivered the uncovered plates to residents in the dining room. Two stacks of approximately 8 lids sat on a rack next to the steam table. Observation of the kitchen door, used by staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to follow acceptable infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection during blood sugar testing (BST) by not cleansing the glucometer (device used to check blood sugar) with an approved disinfectant and by placing the glucometer on an unclean surface for three of three residents observed (Residents #55, #45 and #33). The facility also failed to follow the facility's guidelines regarding Tuberculin Skin Testing (TST, the standard method for screening for tuberculosis) by not documenting the administration of the purified protein derivative (PPD) to test for tuberculosis for three recently admitted residents (Residents #30, #25 and #38) and by not obtaining a yearly tuberculin assessment for two residents (Residents #64 and #42). The sample size was 18. The census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #55's electronic physician's sheet (ePOS), showed an order, dated 10/25/19, to obtain a BST before meals and at bedtime. Observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of individual needs and preferences by not honoring food preferences and failing to provide adaptive plateware and utensils so residents could eat independently for two of 18 residents sampled (Residents #47 and #8). The census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/30/19, showed the following: -Required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, personal hygiene and eating; -Diagnoses included heart failure, end stage renal disease, Alzheimer's disease, stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), anxiety and depression; -Upper and lower extremities with impairment on one side. Review of the resident's November 2019 physician order sheet (POS), showed an order, dated 10/14/19 and revised on 10/29/19, for mechanical soft diet with built up silverware (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-22 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete an inspection of bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for one resident (Residents #48) with siderails to reduce the risks of accidents. The facility census was 77. Review of Resident #47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/30/19, showed the following: -Required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, personal hygiene and eating; -Diagnoses included heart failure, end stage renal disease, Alzheimer's disease, aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech caused by brain damage), stroke, hemiplegia, anxiety and depression; -Upper and lower extremities with impairment on one side; -Bed rails not in use. Review of the resident's Evaluation for Use of Side Rails form, dated 10/25/18, showed quarter siderails were in place on the resident's bed at the resident's request. The evaluation did not include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2019-11-22 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a written transfer/discharge notice to the resident and/or resident's representative, when transferred to the hospital for various medical reasons for nine sampled residents (Residents #37, #58, #64, #13, #27, #42, #11, #57 and #50). The sample was 18. The census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #37's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, admission and discharge assessments, showed the following: -admission date of 8/7/15; -Discharge to the hospital 5/6/19; -readmission to the facility 5/18/19; -Discharge to the hospital 8/23/19; -readmission to the facility 8/26/19; -No documentation the resident and/or their representative received written notice of the resident's transfers. Review of the resident's nurses notes, dated 5/6/19 through 5/18/19 and 8/23/19 through 8/26/19, showed no documentation the resident and/or their representative was provided a written notice of the resident's transfer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2019-11-22 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of the facility's bed hold policy to residents or their legal representatives, at the time of the transfers, for nine sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital for medical reasons (Residents #37, #58, #64, #13, #27, #42, #11, #57 and #50). The sample was 18. The census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #37's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, admission and discharge assessments, showed the following: -admission date of 8/7/15; -Discharge to the hospital 5/6/19; -readmission to the facility 5/18/19; -Discharge to the hospital 8/23/19; -readmission to the facility 8/26/19; -No documentation the resident and/or their representative received written notice of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of the transfers. Review of the resident's nurses notes, dated 5/6/19 through 5/18/19 and 8/23/19 through 8/26/19, showed no documentation the resident and/or their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$242,461 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 3 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $65,960 — penalty dated 2026-03-26
- $176,501 — penalty dated 2023-08-24
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-11 for 9 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-16 for 25 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-24 for 47 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 4.4 | -2.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MARTIN, JEI | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 01/01/2023 |
| STEWART, KALVIN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 07/21/2023 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $446K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265838. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.