No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Arvin Post Acute

323 Campus Drive, Arvin, CA 93203 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 81 certified beds · (661) 854-4475 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation$62,968 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $62,968 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-22)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8787 Hall Rd · (833) 678-2781 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
505 Bear Mountain Blvd #B · (661) 854-5738 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
301 N A St · (661) 390-4890 · Call to confirm hours
Park
A St @ 5th Ave · (661) 854-5591 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.9%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.6%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened36.9%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.6%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.6%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.4%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.0%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit23.3%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.592.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.881.571.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.1%CMS range 34.5–63.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.2–17.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened10.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 5.1–13.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.501.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.21
RN hours/ resident / day
1.22
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.29
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.73
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 76.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-26)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary condition in the kitchen with known infestation of cockroaches as evidenced by: 1. On 12/17/24 and 12/18/24 observed live cockroaches in the kitchen identified as German Cockroaches by the pest control service technician. 2. The kitchen staff do not clean and sanitize the kitchen counters prior to food preparation with known cockroach infestation. This involved nocturnal behavior of cockroaches which are highly likely to be contaminating food contact surfaces during the night. 3. In addition, cockroaches carry germs that can contaminate and had the potential to lead to foodborne illness for highly susceptible residents receiving food from the kitchen. 4. Failed to maintain an effective Pest Control Program. These failures had the potential to place 70 of 72 highly susceptible residents at risk for food borne illnesses in the facility infested with multi-generational German cockroaches which are known to spread 33 kinds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to the hospital promptly for evaluation and treatment of a left leg injury after Resident 1 reported she had injured her left leg and requested to be taken out to the hospital for X-rays (medical imaging to visualize the inside of the body, particularly bones and dense tissues) and treatment, delayed for six days until Resident 1 was taken to the hospital for evaluation and treatment for the left leg fracture (broken bone). This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing continued severe pain in her left leg which required hospitalization and surgical intervention.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), undated, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of abnormal posture and need assistance with personal care.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a comprehensive assessment tool) dated 11/14/25, the MDS indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2021-06-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate nutrition for one of 44 sampled residents (Resident 44) when: 1. The nursing staff did not notify the Primary Care Physician (PCP) and the Family Member (FM) 2 of Resident 44's unplanned weight loss. 2. A care plan addressing unplanned weight loss was not developed and implemented. 3. Ensure the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT - a group of healthcare professionals who work together to provide beneficial care to the residents) addressed the significant weight loss. 4. Dietary recommendations by the Registered Dietician (RD) were not implemented. These failures resulted in Resident 44's unplanned total weight loss of 39 lbs (Pounds-unit of measure) (-15.4%) in 45 days. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 44's admission Record (AR), undated, the AR indicated, Resident 44 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Cutaneous Abscess (Skin infection) of the right lower limb. During a review of Resident 44's Weights and Vitals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) when the care plan did not address the protection of Resident 2 from further physical harm after Resident 1's Family Member (FM) hit Resident 2 in the face with a pillow. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 2 experiencing additional physical assault and potential for injury. Findings:During a review of Resident 2's SBAR (Situation, Background, Appearance, Review and Notify) dated 6/22/26, the SBAR indicated, Struck in the face by a resident's family [Resident's 1 FM]. During a review of Resident 2's Progress Notes (PN) dated 6/23/26, the PN indicated, Resident [2] was identified wandering into another resident's room on 6/22/26 during the PM [afternoon] shift. During this occurrence, the spouse of the roommate [Resident 1's FM] struck the resident [2] in the face with a pillow while staff were intervening and redirecting the resident [2] from the room.During an observation on 6/30/26 at 9:55 a.m. in the hallway…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely develop and implement a care plan for the prevention and treatment of pressure injuries (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying issue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with a shear) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 6 and Resident 28). This failure placed Resident 6 and Resident 28 at risk for developing pressure injuries.Findings: RESIDENT 6 During a review of Resident 6's admission RECORD (AR), dated 3/23/19, the AR indicated, Resident 6's diagnosis includes Diabetes Mellitus (a group of disease that result in too much sugar in the blood), need for assistance with personal care, and vitamin deficiency. During a review of Resident 6's BRADEN SCALE [a tool used to assess a residents risk for skin breakdown] FOR PREDICTING PRESSURE SORE RISK (BSPS), dated 9/23/25 the BSPS indicated, Resident 6 had score of 13 (a score of 15 to 18 is a mild risk, 13 to 14 is a moderate risk, 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure:1. Expired and opened sterile (processed to prevent infection) wound treatment supplies were removed from storage and disposed of. This failure had the potential to result in expired and opened wound treatment supplies being used for residents' care and preventing wound healing and causing infection.2. One of three sampled residents (Resident 28) at risk of falls had fall risk assessments completed after falls. This failure placed Resident 28 at risk of falls and injuries. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 11:03 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, in the medication storage room cabinet, there were two expired sterile wound treatment supply packages and one opened sterile wound treatment supply. LVN 1 stated the sterile foam dressing expired on [DATE] (one year ago). LVN 1 stated the sterile canister supply expired on [DATE] (approximately four months ago). LVN 1 stated the opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility:1. Failed to ensure the ice machine was sanitized (disinfected) according to manufacturer's instructions.2. Failed to ensure a visitor wore a hair net while in the kitchen. These failures placed residents at risk of consuming contaminated food and beverages. Findings: 1. During an interview on 3/24/26 at 10:02 a.m. with the Director of Maintenance (DM) in the kitchen, DM stated he was responsible for cleaning the ice machine. DM stated he cleaned the ice machine using a cleaner which he poured into the machine's water reservoir and let the cleaner to run through the machine's ice-making cycle. DM provided the cleaner he used which read Nickel-Safe Ice Machine Cleaner. DM stated this was the only product he used to clean the ice machine. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/24/26 at 11:35 a.m. with DM, the ice machine's Installation, Use & Care Manual (Ice Machine Manual), dated 10/13 was reviewed. The Ice Machine Manual, under Section 4 Maintenance, indicated the cleaning of the ice machine should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Psychoactive/Psychotropic Medication Use, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 12) when his informed consent for psychotropic (medication to treat mental disorders) medication was not completed. This failure had the potential for Resident 12 to receive psychotropic medication without knowing the risks and benefits of the medication.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/25/26 at 1:37 p.m. with Assistant Regional Director Clinical Services (ARDCS), Resident 12's admission Record (AR), [undated] was reviewed. Resident 12 was on Prozac (used to treat mental disorder) 20 mg by mouth every day started on 1/9/26. ARDCS stated there was no informed consent obtained prior to administering this medication.During a review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Psychoactive/Psychotropic Medication Use, [undated], the P&P indicated, The prescribing clinician will obtain informed consent from the resident (or, as appropriate, the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 34) was provided enough electrical outlets when Resident 34 was unable to plug in her television and refrigerator at the same time. This failure resulted in Resident 34 not being able to use her television. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/23/26 at 9:53 a.m. with Resident 34 in Resident 34's room, a small refrigerator was plugged into an electrical outlet on the wall at the foot of Resident 34's bed. The cord for the television was unplugged. Resident 34 stated the facility would not allow her to have an extension cord with multiple outlets. Resident 34 stated she had only two single outlet plugs to use to charge her phone, use a lamp, plug in her refrigerator and use the television. Resident 34 stated she had to ask staff for assistance for plugging and unplugging her devices. Resident 34 stated she has not been able to watch television for a while since there were not enough outlets. During a review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform and/or obtain Advance Directive (AD - written statement of person's wishes regarding medical treatment and end of life decisions, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person become unable to communicate their wishes) options for three of 24 sampled residents (Resident 11, Resident 72, and Resident 6). This failure had the potential for residents' end of life wishes to not be honored.Findings:During a review of Resident 11's Medical Record (MR), the MR contained no documentation the facility provided written information showing whether Resident 11 had formulated an advance directive, whether Resident 11 wished to do so, or if assistance was offered.During a review of Resident 72's MR, the MR contained no documentation the facility provided written information showing whether Resident 72 had formulated an AD, whether Resident 72 wished to do so, or if assistance was offered.During a review of Resident 6's MR, the MR contained no documentation the facility provided written information showing whether…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify ombudsman (representatives who assist residents in long-term care facilities with issues related to day-day care, health, safety, and personal preferences) of four of four sampled residents (Resident 11, Resident 12, Resident 6, and Resident 80) planned transfers and discharges. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 11, Resident 12, Resident 6, and Resident 80 not having an advocate who could inform them of their admission, transfer, and discharge rights and options.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/25/26 at 9:47 a.m. with Assistant Regional Director Clinical Services (ARDCS), Resident 11's Medical Record (MR), [undated] was reviewed. ARDCS stated Resident 11 was transferred to hospital on 3/21/25, 8/26/25, and 3/15/26. ARDCS stated there was no ombudsman notification completed for 3/21/25, 8/26/25, and 3/15/26. ARDCS stated Ombudsman should have been notified after each transfer out to hospital.During a review of Resident 6's MR, [undated], the MR indicated Resident 6 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the complete Baseline Care Plan (BCP- initial instructions for care of the residents) for two of six sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 11). This failure had the potential to result in staff being unaware of residents' needs.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/25/26 at 9:31 a.m. with Assistant Regional Director Clinical Services (ARDCS), Resident 3's Medical Record (MR), [undated] was reviewed. Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE]. ARDSC was unable to find documentation for BCP. ARDSC stated BCP should be initiated within 48 hours. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/25/26 at 9:47 a.m. with ARDCS, Resident 11's MR, [undated] was reviewed. Resident 11 was admitted on [DATE]. ARDSC stated she was unable to find documentation for BCP.During a review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plans - Baseline, dated 5/2024, the P&P indicated, A baseline plan of care should be developed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 105) was offered and provided showers when requested. This failure resulted in Resident 105 only showering once during a seven day period. Findings: During a review of Resident 105's admission Record (AR), undated, the AR indicated Resident 105 was admitted on [DATE]. During an interview on 3/23/26 at 3:32 p.m. with Resident 105, Resident 105 stated she was not receiving enough showers. Resident 105 stated she wanted more showers. Resident 105 stated she requested a shower yesterday but was denied. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/25/26 at 10:05 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), Resident 105's shower flowsheets were reviewed. DSD opened Resident 105's Bathing log in the computer which indicated Resident 105 had a total of four showers since admission, on 3/17/26, 3/19/26, 3/20/26 and 3/24/26. DSD stated there were no shower refusals documented in Resident 105's Bathing log. DSD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 43) receiving tube feedings was kept with his head elevated at least 30 degrees while receiving tube feedings. This failure placed Resident 43 at risk of aspiration (food or liquid going into the lungs causing disease and respiratory problems). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/23/26 at 12:37 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 in Resident 43's room, Resident 43 was receiving tube feedings while lying flat in his bed. LVN 1 stated Resident 43's head of bed should be elevated 45 degrees when receiving tube feedings. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/25/26 at 3:35 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) in Resident 43's room, Resident 43 was receiving tube feedings while lying flat in his bed. DON stated Resident 43's head of bed should be elevated 30 degrees when receiving tube feedings. During a review of Resident 43's care plan (CP) titled Resident requires tube feeding ., dated 3/20/26 with the objective, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty eight hours a day, seven days a week. This failure had the potential for resident care to be negatively impacted.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/24/26 at 3:18 p.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), the Detail Time and Job (clock in log) dated 1/10/26, 2/22/26, 3/14/26, and 3/15/26 was reviewed. DSD stated there was no RN present in the building for 8 hours a day during those days.During a review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Staffing, Sufficient and Competent nursing, dated 8/2022, the P&P indicated, 3. A registered nurse provides services at least eight (8) consecutive hours every 24 hours, seven (7) days a week. RNs may be scheduled more than eight (8) hours depending on the acuity needs of the resident.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Performance Evaluation (PE - a process to give employees feedback on their job performance) for five of five sampled employees (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] 1, CNA 2, CNA 3, CNA 4, CNA 5) were completed. This failure had the potential for the staff not to be aware of their need for improvement in certain areas, which could affect resident care.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/25/26 at 8:13 a.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), CNA 1's Personnel File (PF) was reviewed. The PF indicated CNA 1 was hired on 2/1/18 and last PE was done on 7/5/24 and there was no PE found after 7/5/24. DSD stated PE should be completed annually.During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/25/26 at 8:27 a.m. with DSD, CNA 2's PF was reviewed. The PF indicated CNA 2 was hired on 5/7/24 and there was no PE found in their PF. DSD stated PE should be completed annually.During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/25/26 at 8:29 a.m. with DSD, CNA 3's PF was reviewed. The PF indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe administration of medications when medications were found at Resident 33's bedside table without a medication self- administration assessment or a physician order for one of 24 sampled resident (Resident 33). This failure had the potential for medications to be administered incorrectly and unsafely.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/23/26 at 9:20 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, in Resident 33's room, Resident 33 had a medication cup on the bedside table with five pills and three capsules in the medication cup and no nurse was present in the room. LVN 2 stated in the medication cup there were pantoprazole (medication used for stomach acid), aspirin (to prevent blood clots), cresemba (medication to treat fungal infections), metformin (medication used to treat high blood sugar), multi-vitamin, vitamin C, Vitamin B12 (used for vitamin deficiency) and senna (stool softener). LVN 2 stated nurses should wait and watch until residents swallow all the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 56 and Resident 43) were provided care using Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - use of gowns and gloves to reduce transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 56 and Resident 43 developing an infection. Findings: During an observation on 3/23/26 at 8:57 a.m. in the doorway of Resident 56's room, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 6 was at Resident 56's bedside wearing gloves (no gown) while giving care to Resident 56. A sign on the name plate outside of Resident 56's room indicated Resident 56 was on EBP. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/23/26 at 9:03 a.m. in the doorway of Resident 56's room, CNA 6 was at Resident 56's bedside wearing gloves (no gown) tying a trash bag then exited the room. CNA 6 stated Resident 56 had a wound on his groin but was not sure what EBP means. CNA 6 stated she was only wearing gloves while providing care to Resident 56. During a review of Resident 56's Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) on abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation reporting and investigating when: 1. The facility did not complete a follow-up investigation report (FIR) after a resident-to-resident altercation (RRA) within five days for two of seven sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 and Resident 2 to have another altercation, and to develop distress and injuries. 2. The facility did not report an allegation of financial abuse to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within 24 hours of an allegation for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential for emotional distress for Resident 3. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation), dated 5/20/25, the SBAR indicated, Resident (1) states he woke up and saw (Resident 2) sitting on the end of the bed, (Resident 2) grabbed (Resident 1's) pillow from behind his head and starting to hit him with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) responsible party (RP) was notified of a change of condition (COC). This failure had the potential for Resident 2's RP not to be aware of Resident 2's COC. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 4/23/25 at 2:10 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 2's Change in Condition, (COC) dated 4/9/25 was reviewed. The COC indicated Resident 2 had a witnessed fall. Resident 2's admission Record, (AR) indicated Resident 2 had RP. Resident 2's Minimum Data Set, (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 1/31/25 was reviewed. The MDS indicated, Resident 1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was 6 (a score of 0-7 points severely impaired cognition). LVN 1 reviewed Resident 2's progress notes and confirmed no RP notification was documented. LVN 1 stated Resident 2's RP should have been notified regarding Resident 2's fall on 4/9/25. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Change of Resident's Condition or Status,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/17/24 at 10:39 a.m. with Nurse Consultant (NC) 1, Resident 30's medical record, was reviewed. NC 1 was unable to find documentation of an AD for Resident 30. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/17/24 at 10:40 a.m. with NC 1, Resident 59's medical record, was reviewed. NC 1 was unable to find documentation of an AD for Resident 59. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/17/24 at 10:42 a.m. with NC 1, Resident 64's medical record, was reviewed. NC 1 was unable to find documentation of an AD for Resident 64. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Advance Directives, dated 9/2022, the P&P indicated,1. If the resident or representative indicates that he or she has not established advance directives, the facility staff will offer assistance in establishing advance directives. A. The resident or representative is given the option to accept or decline assistance, and care will not be contingent on either decision. B. Nursing staff will document in the medical record the offer to assist and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and implement nationally recognized infection prevention and control practices for seven of seven sampled residents (Resident 12, Resident 30, Resident 33, Resident 43, Resident 49, Resident 183, and Resident 379) as evidenced by: 1. Linens stored for two of two sampled residents (Resident 33 and Resident 183) on the bedside table inside Resident 33 and Resident 183's room. 2. Resident 12 and Resident 43's hands were not cleansed prior to eating lunch. 3. The treatment nurse (TN) did not wear proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- refers to gowns, gloves, masks, goggles, face shields to protect the wearer from injury or infection) during wound treatment and dressing change for one of one resident (Resident 49) on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP- an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO-bacteria that have become resistant to multiple antibiotics] that employs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective Pest Control Program when live cockroaches were repeatedly found in the kitchen. This failure placed 70 of 72 highly susceptible sampled residents, at risk for foodborne illnesses when receiving food from the kitchen infested with cockroaches. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/16/24 at 8:15 a.m. with Dietary Manager (DM) in the kitchen, there were nine dead cockroaches in a floor drain above the sink where food was prepared. DM stated, those are bugs [dead cockroaches in the drain]. During an interview on 12/16/24 at 8:16 a.m. with DM, DM stated she had seen ants, pincher bugs, and cockroaches in the kitchen. DM stated she noticed them (ants, pincher bugs, and cockroaches) during the renovation of the kitchen approximately March 2024. During an observation on 12/17/24 at 11:25 a.m. in the kitchen, there was a live cockroach crawling on the wall above the dishwasher. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the physician provided the informed consent (the process in which a health care professional educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or medication) on the use of antipsychotic (drugs that treat psychosis [mental distress, mental disorder] and related conditions and symptoms) medication for one of one sampled resident (Resident 43) prior to the verbal consent obtained from Resident 43's representative. This failure had the potential for the resident and/or the resident representative to not receive the appropriate information regarding the drug, its indication, side-effects, and make the right decision. 2. Ensure licensed personnel witness and validate the verbal consent received from the resident representative for one of one resident (Resident 43) and sign the informed consent form to validate the consent and the material information provided. This failure had the potential for the informed consent to be dismissed. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure confidentiality of Private Health Information (PHI) was maintained for two of two sampled residents (Resident 25 and Resident 58). This failure resulted in Resident 25 and Resident 58's PHI being compromised and seen by unauthorized personnel. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's Clinical Record (CR), The CR contained Resident 58's clinical note titled, Skilled Nursing Progress Note (SNPN), dated 10/18/24. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/17/24 at 9:53 a.m. with Medical Records Clerk (DMR), Resident 25's CR was reviewed. DMR stated, Resident 58's SNPN was in Resident 25's CR. DMR stated that was the incorrect clinical record. During a review of Resident 58's admission Agreement (AA), dated 6/21/24, the AA indicated, Resident 58 agreed that she read and understood Resident [NAME] of Rights Section (e) Privacy and confidentiality indicating the resident has the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and clinical records and Section X. Confidentiality of Your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Personal Property, for two of two sampled residents (Resident 30 and Resident 21) when: 1. Resident 30's belongings were not inventoried and documented on admission. 2. Resident 21's clothing went missing in the facility. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the resident's psychosocial well-being and had the potential to result in lack of reimbursement for lost belongings. Findings: During an interview on 12/16/24 at 3 p.m. with Resident 30, Resident 30 stated he had four pairs of underwear when he was admitted to the facility, and he had two left. Resident 30 stated he reported it to a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) few days ago and the CNA looked for them in the laundry and did not find them. During a review of Resident 30's admission Record (AR), dated 11/27/24, the AR indicated Resident 30 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a concurrent interview and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Baseline Care Plan (BCP- outlines a process for development of an initial person-centered care plan within the first 48 hours of admission, that will provide instructions for care of the resident) was completed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 12) within 48-hours of admission and a summary provided to the resident and/or resident representative. This failure had the potential for Resident 12 to not receive the care and the safeguards necessary within the 48-hour of admission. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 12 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including, Diabetes Mellitus (blood sugar is too high) with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage that is caused by diabetes), End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD- final, permanent stage of chronic kidney disease). During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/18/24 at 1:58 p.m. with Minimum Data Set (resident assessment tool)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for personal grooming, including care of the fingernails for one of one sampled resident (Resident 12). This failure had the potential for unmet care needs. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/16/24 at 2:50 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 in Resident 12's room, Resident 12 was seated in his wheelchair. Noticed Resident 12's hands were dry. The left-hand fingernails were long and inside the nailbeds were blackish substance. The 5th and 4th fingernails were long, and the nailbeds were black in color. LVN 2 stated Resident 12's fingernails were long and needed trimming. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/17/24 at 8:50 a.m. with Treatment Nurse (TN) and Resident 12 in Resident 12's room, Resident 12's fingernails remained long and nailbeds black in color. TN stated Resident 12's fingernails have dirt inside the fingernails. TN stated Resident 12's fingernails were long on the left hand; the right hand had some…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan after a change of status for Hospice (end of life care) services for one of two sampled residents (Resident 25). This failure had the potential for Resident 25 to receive Hospice services when no longer needed. Findings: During a record review of Resident 25's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated November 2024, the OSR indicated, Resident is discharged from [Name of Hospice Company] as of 11/15/24 due to extended prognosis. During a record review of Resident 25's Nursing-Weekly Summary (NWS), dated 12/15/24, the NWS indicated, Currently under hospice care. During a review of Resident 25's End of Life: Care Plans (ELCP), dated 11/15/24, the ELCP indicated, Resident requires Hospice care and is at risk for rapid decline in activities of daily living, sudden onset or worsening skin integrity, weight loss, nausea/vomiting, pain, abnormal breathing, impaired psychosocial wellbeing related to terminal illness. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/17/24 at 8:19 a.m. with Administrator in Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oral care was rendered for one of one sampled resident (Resident 33) to maintain oral hygiene. This failure had the potential for Resident 33 to acquire oral infections, tooth decay, or gum disease. Findings: During a review of Resident 33's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 33 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including Hemiplegia (complete paralysis) and Hemiparesis (weakness on one side) following cerebral infarction (stroke-[bleeding in the brain]). During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/16/24 at 9:46 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 in Resident 33's room, Resident 33 was awake sitting in his bed. Resident 33 had weakness on the right side of the body. LVN 2 stated Resident 33 is paralyzed on the right side. Resident 33 was slow in communicating but able to respond to questions. Resident 33's mouth was dry and teeth yellowish in color. Resident 33 stated no one brushes his teeth before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement person center quality care for one of one sampled resident (Resident 10) when Resident 10's fingernails were not trimmed, hand splint was not applied and, physician's order for surgical consultant was not procesed. This failure resulted in delayed care for Resident 10 and had the potential for adverse outcomes. Findings: During an observation on 12/16/24 at 10 a.m. in Resident 10's room, Resident 10's left hand was contracted (abnormal bend of the joint) where her middle three fingers were folded in toward her palm. Resident 10's fingernails on her left hand were long, thick, and curled over going into the skin of her left palm. Resident 10 did not have any type of splint on her left arm/hand. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/18/24 at 10:21 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 in Resident 10's room, Resident 10's left hand was observed. LVN 3 stated, I do not know if Resident 10 is supposed to have a hand splint on her left hand or not. I have worked the last three days and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide foot care and podiatry (foot specialist) referral for one of one sampled resident (Resident 33). This failure resulted in Resident 33's feet and toenails to be left untreated. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/17/24 at 8:11 a.m. with Treatment Nurse (TN) in Resident 33's room, Resident's right big toenail appeared deformed, with abnormal growth, yellowish, and had fungus-like appearance. The right 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th toes had long, thick, yellowish toenails. The right 5th toenail had blackish discoloration. The skin on the top of the right foot was dry and flaky. The left big toenail was yellowish in color and thick. The left 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th toenails were long and the nails were curled inwards. TN stated Resident 33's nails needed trimming. TN stated she just checked around the monitoring bracelet to see if there were any abrasions around the lower extremity. TN stated, I check the feet whenever the resident has no socks on; otherwise, no. TN obtained a measuring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to manage and document pain accurately for one of one sampled resident (Resident 12). This failure had the potential for Resident 12 to not be able to function and perform daily activities and improve quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 12 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including, Diabetes Mellitus (blood sugar is too high with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage that is caused by diabetes), End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD- final, permanent stage of chronic kidney disease). During a review of Resident 12's Wound Evaluation, dated 11/28/24, the Wound Evaluation indicated, 1. Pressure-Deep Tissue Injury (DTI- purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin or blood filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from pressure and/or shear), right heel: area 10.19 centimeter (cm), length 5.83 cm, and width 4.4 cm. Present on admission 2. Pressure-DTI, left heel: area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Dietary Manager (DM) failed to demonstrate competency to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for all the residents residing in the facility when there was a multi-generational cockroach infestation in the kitchen. This failure resulted in no action plan put in place to address and meet the health and safety needs for the residents. Findings: During an observation on 12/16/24 at 8:15 a.m. in the kitchen, there were nine dead cockroaches in a drain above a sink where food is prepared. During an interview on 12/16/24 at 8:16 a.m. with Dietary Manager (DM), DM stated, Those are bugs [dead cockroaches in the drain]. DM stated she has seen ants, pincher bugs, and cockroaches in the kitchen. DM stated she started noticing them (ants, pincher bugs, and cockroaches) when the facility started renovation this year approximately March 2024. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 10:28 a.m. with Registered Dietitian (RD), RD stated she was not made aware by anyone in the facility that there were live cockroaches. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0848 — isolated
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Admissions Coordinator (AC) had the full understanding of the Binding Arbitration Agreement (BAA-the parties waive their right to a trial and agree to accept the arbitrator's decision as final) to be able to explain the content of the BAA for three of 47 sampled residents (Resident 7, Resident 8, and Resident 64) in the manner, form, and language understood by the resident and/or resident representative. This failure had the potential for Resident 7, Resident 8, and Resident 64 and/or their representatives to be misinformed and not fully understand the terms and conditions stipulated in the arbitration agreement. Findings: During an interview on 12/19/24 at 8:21 a.m. with AC, AC stated there were 47 residents who had participated and signed the BAA. AC stated the BAA is part of the admissions packet. AC stated the expectation of the Administrator and Leadership was to ensure the arbitration agreement was signed. AC stated, I inform the resident and/or the resident representative they will go to a mediator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary shower area was provided for the residents. This failure had the potential for injury and spread of infectious disease to facility residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/1/24 at 2:10 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, in the south shower room stall one. CNA 1 stated, There was a plastic piece (vinyl cover) that fell off over the weekend on Saturday (9/28/24). CNA 1 stated she put the vinyl cover to the side (space just outside of shower room stall one). During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/1/24 at 2:15 p.m. with Housekeeping Manager (HM), in the south shower room stall one. There was a broken and missing tiles and a tan substance noted on the pony wall (half wall) of shower stall one. HM stated the housekeeping staff could not properly clean the area with the missing tiles. There was a black substance noted on the bottom of the shower grout line. HM stated, I do not know what that is but it looks like it will come back if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) were free from verbal abuse. This failure resulted in Activity Assistant (AA) verbally abused Resident 1 and Resident 2 during activities and had the potential to cause emotional harm. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/9/24 at 4:03 p.m. with Resident 1 in the dining room, Resident 1 had his eyebrows folded and moved his head side to side (right to left) and stated, I was in shock. He [AA] yelled and cursed at him and Resident 2 during activities on 4/7/24. Resident 1 stated AA lead activities at the facility and activities were supposed to be fun and it wasn't that day [4/7/24]. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/24/23, the H&P indicated, Resident 1 had the mental capacity to make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Weekly Summary Note (WSN), dated 4/25/24, the WSN indicated, Resident is alert and oriented, able to verbalize needs. During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an investigation of a verbal abuse allegation within five working days for one of four sample residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for suffering continuous verbal abuse. Findings: During an interview on 2/28/24 at 10:29 am with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was being rude to her. Resident 1 stated she woke up and called CNA 1 for help, and CNA 1 was already in Resident 1 ' s room attending to Resident 2. Resident 1 stated she was in her wheelchair and wheeled herself towards CNA 1. Resident 1 stated CNA 1 told her, Again? You? I hardly want to talk to you. Resident 1 stated she asked CNA 1, What have I done to you? and she stated CNA 1 told her, I don ' t want to have you. If I know you ' re here, I wouldn ' t have come. Resident 1 stated she is worried that it (verbal abuse) will happen again. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Progress Notes (PN), dated February 26, 2024, the PN indicated, Resident [1] was very upset stating that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure laundry was cleaned and sanitized according to the manufacturer's guidelines. This failure had the potential to result in the transmission of infection and communicable diseases to all residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/5/24 at 9:26 a.m. with Laundry Staff (LS) 1 and Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor (HLS) in the facility laundry room, LS 1 loaded towels and sheets into the washing machine and pressed 19. LS 1 left the room immediately after loading the machine. HLS stated she did not know what the number 19 meant, but stated her staff knew that information. During a concurrent observation and record review on 1/5/24 at 9:32 a.m., an ECOLAB Formula Chart [chart that describes which type of laundry is being washed so the correct chemicals for that type will be automatically dispensed into the machine] was observed on the side of another washing machine. The formula chart indicated Towels Formula 1.Sheets Formula 2. During a concurrent interview and record review on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) care plan was implemented. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to have unmet care needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s care plan [Resident 2] is high risk for falls ., initiated 12/14/23, interventions included was a falling star program. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/19/23 at 2:40 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1), CNA 1 confirmed Resident 2 did not have a star on his name plate on the door. CNA 1 stated, I don ' t know the criteria you have to have to get the star. [Resident 2] did have a fall he rolled off the side off his bed a week ago. CNA 1 stated a star would normally be on the name plate on the door and wheelchairs of residents at risk for falls. During an interview on 12/19/23 at 4:05 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON was informed of the findings and stated care plans should be created and implemented. During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Falls and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility to ensure fall risk assessments were completed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). This failure had the potential for staff not to be aware of Resident 2 ' s risk for falls. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s Progress Notes, (PN) dated 12/13/23, the PN indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] at 6:57 p.m. During a review of Resident 2 ' s PN, dated 12/13/23 at 9:45 p.m., the PN indicated Resident 2 had an unwitnessed fall. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/19/23 at 2:01 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON reviewed Resident 2 ' s medical record and confirmed there was no fall risk assessment completed upon admission and there was no post fall assessment completed after Resident 2's fall incident on 12/13/23. During an interview on 12/19/23 at 4:05 p.m. with DON, DON stated fall risk and post-fall assessments should be completed. During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Falls and Fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed and implemented after a change of condition for one of two residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive need medical treatments. Findings: During an interview on 11/21/23 at 10:43 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated Resident 1 PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter - is a long, thin tube inserted through a vein in your arm and passed through to the larger veins near your heart, used to deliver medications and other treatments directly to the large central veins near your heart.) line in place and he pulled the PICC line out twice two days in a row. DON stated the facility staff sent Resident 1 to the emergency room (ER) hoping the ER would admit Resident 1 until treatment was completed. During a review of Resident 1 ' s EMAR (electronic medication administration note), dated 11/4/23 at 10 a.m. the EMAR indicated, [Resident 1] pulled out picc [sic] line. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Nurse ' s Note, (NN) dated 11/8/23 at 12:11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-06-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly maintain sanitary kitchen and food storage areas. These failures had the potential to spread food borne illness to residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/21/21, at 9:59 AM, with Cook, in the facility kitchen, the handwashing sink had dried debris and food crumbs in the basin and rim of the sink. [NAME] verified the findings. A stainless-steel tray was located on the immediate left side of the handwashing sink. The tray held cylinders of eating utensils. The top portion of the tray had dried water spots and food crumbs around the cylinder utensil holders. [NAME] stated the utensils being stored in the tray were clean. [NAME] verified the tray holding the clean utensils was not clean. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/21/21, at 10:03 AM, with Cook, in the kitchen near the dishwasher, two bowls on drying racks had food crumbs on their exposed surface. [NAME] stated the bowls on the drying racks were clean and verified the findings. A stainless-steel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for one of 44 sampled residents (Resident 50). This failure had the potential for unmet care needs. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/21/21, at 1 PM, with Resident 50, in the dining room, Resident 50 was observed eating a mechanical soft diet (foods made easier to chew and swallow). Resident 50 stated, I do not know why I am still eating a mechanical soft diet. I want to eat real food. During a review of Resident 50's Order Details (OD), dated 11/7/20, the OD indicated, Mechanical Soft, chopped meat texture, Nectar Thick Consistency [fluids thickened for residents with difficulty swallowing]. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/24/21, at 9:28 AM, with Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist (ADON/IP). ADON/IP was unable to provide a care plan addressing Resident 50's need for mechanical soft diet. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), dated 11/17, the P&P indicated 1. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label a multiple-dose insulin (regulates the amount of glucose in the blood) pen (an injection device with a needle that delivers insulin underneath the skin) in the medication cart. This failure had the potential for medication to be given to the wrong resident. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/23/21, at 9:10 AM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, at medication cart 1, an unlabeled Novolog (brand of insulin) Insulin Pen was noted with a labeled date of 6/22/21. LVN 1 stated, she had removed the insulin pen from the emergency kit (E-Kit - medication that can be dispensed when pharmacy services are not available) yesterday, and dated it with the date opened and administered a dose of insulin to a resident. LVN 1 stated, she did not label the insulin pen with the resident's name. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/23/21, at 9:40 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON) and LVN 1, the unlabeled Novolog Insulin Pen was observed. DON verified the insulin pen was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide and facilitate smoking activity for one of 44 sampled residents (Resident 49). This failure resulted in Resident 49's inability to exercise his rights regarding activity preferences. Findings: During a review of Resident 49's admission Record (AR), undated, the AR indicated, Resident 49 was admitted on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 5/12/21, was reviewed. The MDS indicated, Resident 49 was able to think coherently, clearly, logically and had no altered level of consciousness. During a concurrent observation and record review, on 6/22/21, at 11:11 AM, with Resident 49, in his room, Resident 49 was observed lying in bed with a smoking schedule signage posted on the wall. Resident 49 stated, They put the schedule up so I can see the times when to go out and smoke. I used to smoke, but the facility doesn't allow me to smoke anymore. I don't mind getting up to smoke, but they won't let me. It makes me mad…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-24 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment (CA) after a significant change in the resident's condition for one of 44 sampled residents (Resident 44). This failure had the potential to result in delay of treatment, planning of care, and provision of appropriate services for Resident 44. Findings: During a review of Resident 44's admission Record (AR), undated, the AR indicated Resident 44 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Cutaneous Abscess (Skin abscess) of the right lower limb. During a review of Resident 44's Wound Nursing Home Visit Notes (WN), dated 5/21/21, the WN indicated, Resident 44 developed a Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer (PU-partial thickness loss of skin) to sacral area (base of the spine to the tailbone). During a review of Resident 44's Weights and Vitals Summary (WVS), dated 5/21 and 6/21, the WVS indicated, the weights as follows: 5/1/21: 255.8 pounds (lbs-unit of measurement) 5/8/21: 248.4 lbs 5/16/21: 242.2 lbs 6/1/21: 241.4 lbs (weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities to identify health problems) reflected the accurate status for one of 44 sampled residents (Resident 49). This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 49's plan of care and delivery of services. Findings: During an interview on 6/22/21, at 11:22 AM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated Resident 49 refuses to get out of bed, eat, and take his medications. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/22/21, at 1:10 PM, with Resident 49, in his room, Resident 49 was observed lying in bed. Resident 49 stated he does not like to take his medications at times. No other staff members except the nurses who give him his medications have addressed this issue with him. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/24/21, at 2:29 PM, with MDS Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 49's MDS (Section E - Behavior), dated 5/12/21 was reviewed. The MDS indicated, Resident 49's Rejection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physicians order for one of 44 sampled residents (Resident 39) when a positioning device was not implemented. This failure had the potential for skin breakdown. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 6/22/21, the OSR indicated, Turn resident (Resident 39) every 2 hours, float heals [sic] in the morning During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review, on 6/22/21, at 9:33 AM, with LVN l, in Resident 39's room, Resident 39 was lying in his bed with no positioning device to float his left heel. Resident 39's OSR, dated 6/22/21 was reviewed. LVN 1 verified Resident had an order to float heels in the morning. LVN 1 verified there was no positioning device underneath Resident 39's left heel as ordered. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Physician orders, accepting, transcribing and implementing (Noting), the P&P indicated, Licensed nursing personnel will ensure that telephone and verbal orders will be recorded and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistive care was provided for two of 44 sampled residents (Resident 26 and Resident 39). This failure had potential for emotional discomfort and decline in functional abilities. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/21/21, at 10:28 AM, with resident 26, in Resident 26's room, Resident 26 was lying in his bed wearing a facility gown. Resident 26 stated, he had not been out of his bed for a few days and a staff member was supposed to get him out of bed. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/22/21, at 11:49 AM, with Resident 26, in Resident 26's room, Resident 26 was lying in his bed wearing a facility gown. Resident 26 stated, he would like to get up and out of his bed. Resident 26 stated, he would also like to be changed into his own personal clothes. During a review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 4/13/21, the MDS indicated, Section G - Functional Status. Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance.1. Self - performance. extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing services (person-centered care designed to improve or maintain the functional ability of residents) were provided for one of 44 sampled residents (Resident 39). This failure had the potential for Resident 39 to not maintain his highest level of physical function. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/21/21, at 11:12 AM, with Resident 39, in Resident 39's room, Resident 39 was lying in his bed and stated he was unable to move his left arm and left leg. Resident 39 stated, he had been admitted to the nursing facility after having a stroke (when blood supply to a part of the brain is interrupted or reduced) to receive physical therapy. Resident 39 stated, his physical therapy had stopped, and he had been told he was going to have someone come in to exercise his body, but this had not occurred. During an interview on 6/21/21, at 2:51 PM, with Resident 39, and Family Member (FM) 1, FM 1 stated, the reason we came to this facility was because we were told they had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was five percent or less when two medication errors were observed out of 26 medication administration opportunities, which yielded a medication error rate of 7.69 percent. These failures had the potential for residents to not receive the therapeutic effects of the medications. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 6/23/21, at 12:05 PM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, LVN 2 removed Resident 20's Terazosin (for high blood pressure) 2 mg (milligrams-unit of measure) capsule from the medication bubble pack (MBP) (medication capsule in individual compartments), opened capsule and placed contents in medicine cup. LVN 2 did not review Resident 20's MBP label. LVN 2 gave Terazosin 2 mg via G tube (gastric tube - tube inserted into stomach for food and medication administration). During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/23/21, at 12:05 PM, with LVN 1, the MBP label was reviewed. The MBP label indicated Terazosin 2 mg capsule, 1 capsule via G tube every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control standards, when staff didn't perform hand hygiene. This failure had the potential to spread illness and disease to two of 44 residents (Resident 21 and Resident 221). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/21/21, at 12:51 PM, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, in the South Hallway, CNA 1 pushed a meal tray cart into the South Hallway. CNA 1 opened the door to the meal tray cart and removed the tray for Resident 221 without performing hand hygiene. CNA 1 knocked on the door before entering the room and delivered Resident 221's tray. CNA 1 exited the room and did not perform hand hygiene. CNA 1 removed Resident 21's tray from the meal cart and entered the room. CNA 1 retrieved a bedside table from another room for Resident 21. CNA 1 arranged the bedside table for Resident 21 and placed the meal tray on the table. CNA 1 then came out of the room and removed a third tray from the cart without performing hand hygiene. CNA 1 verified she did not perform hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$62,968 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $32,555 — penalty dated 2026-01-22
  • $30,413 — penalty dated 2024-12-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 54.4-3.4 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA 1 of 5San Diego Post-Acute CenterEl Cajon, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FARRER, TODDIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/01/2023
ALLOWITZ, KIMBALLIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2023
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/10/2021
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/10/2021
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$451K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 10%Medicare 10%Other / private 81%

This home reported $451K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$363per resident / day
operating cost
$11,048per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$370per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555170. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next