Dublin Post Acute
4075 West Dublin-Granville Road, Dublin, OH 43017 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (614) 210-0541 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Oct 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (82) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $197,547 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-31)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.4% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 55.3% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.4% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.2% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.0% | 25.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.4% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.9% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.6% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 63.6% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.4% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.6% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 108 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.7%CMS range 44.2–65.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.5–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.1%CMS range 3.5–12.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 66.5 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 54 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
82 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 66 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, pharmacy medication regimen review, interviews with staff, Medical Director #404, Pharmacy Clinical Director #406, and Family Member #500, review of information on the American Heart Association Website www.heart.org, review of the Eliquis online customer information, and consultant pharmacy contract review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for Resident #105. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm when Resident #105, who had a history of atrial fibrillation (a condition of rapid heartrate), and cerebral vascular accident (CVA/stroke) did not receive physician ordered anticoagulation therapy (Eliquis) to prevent blood clot formation from [DATE] to [DATE]. On [DATE], Resident #105 was transferred to the hospital with presenting symptoms of facial droop and aphasia (difficulty speaking). The resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with an embolic stroke and subsequently passed away on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer program to timely identify, treat and/or prevent a decline of pressure ulcers. Actual Harm occurred to one resident (#23), who had been identified at risk for pressure ulcer development and required maximum staff assistance for bed mobility, on 12/10/25 when the facility failed to accurately assess, put a treatment and appropriate interventions in place in a timely manner, and complete treatments as ordered to a pressure ulcer wound to the resident's back that was first identified on 12/08/25 (two days after the resident was admitted to the facility). An outside wound company assessed the area on 12/10/25 and identified the area as a Stage II (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough) pressure ulcer to the center midline upper back that measured two centimeters (cm) long, two cm wide, and 0.01…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a fall investigation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to effectively manage one resident's (Resident #43) pain following an unwitnessed fall which resulted in a T12 spinal fracture. Actual harm occurred on 10/07/24 when Resident #43 reported head, neck, and low back pain to Unit Manager (UM) #267. Resident #43 reported an unwitnessed fall occurred in her room on 10/06/24. Resident #43 received scheduled pain medications at 8:04 A.M. Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #700 assessed Resident #43 on 10/07/24 at approximately 9:00 A.M. The resident reported 10 out of 10 pain where 10 is the worst pain possible and was visibly crying while ambulating with her walker. CNP #700 ordered Resident #43 to be transported to the hospital for further evaluation via non-emergency transportation. Resident #43 did not receive any non-pharmacological interventions or pain medication. Resident #43 arrived at the hospital at 12:39 P.M. (almost…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, review of hospital medical records and policy review, the facility failed to monitor the urinary status of Resident #84 following the removal of an indwelling urinary catheter resulting in urine retention and hospitalization for treatment. This resulted in Actual Harm on 05/10/24 when Resident #84, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an indwelling urinary catheter due to urine retention and failing a voiding trial, was not adequately monitored following the removal of the catheter. On 05/10/24 at 1:12 A.M. the resident complained of lower abdominal pain and distention of the lower abdomen. The resident was catheterized (urinary tube inserted through the urethra and into the bladder) to relieve the lower abdominal pain and distention, removing 1,300 milliliters (ml) of blood-tinged urine with sediment from the resident's bladder. The resident was subsequently transferred to the emergency room after she began to experience altered mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-02-08 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, resident interview, staff interview, observation, resident family interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure central venous line (a type of intravenous access that goes directly into central circulation near the heart) dressing changes were completed as ordered. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #43's central venous line dressing changes were not completed as ordered and Resident #43 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with sepsis from a central line-associated blood stream infection. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) (a type of intravenous access inserted through a peripheral vein which terminates in central circulation near the heart) dressings changes were completed as ordered. This affected two residents (Residents #43 and #130) of four residents reviewed for care of intravenous lines. The facility identified seven residents in the facility with intravenous access.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, medical record review, hospital documentation review, staff and resident representative interviews, review of employee personnel files, review of disciplinary action documentation, review of an investigation, and review of facility initiated corrective action, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care was provided to prevent a resident fall. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #98 was transferred by a mechanical (Hoyer) lift incorrectly, and subsequently fell, causing a fracture to inferior pubic ramus and S3 fracture (sacral) which required hospitalization. Additionally, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident when Resident #98 fell from the Hoyer lift. This affected one (#98) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of Resident #98's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff, resident and family interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure scheduled personal hygiene care was consistently provided. This affected two (Resident #32 and #45) out of three dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 69.Findings Included:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #32, revealed an admission date of 01/24/26 with re-entry on 03/01/26. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, unspecified asthma, aftercare following joint replacement surgery, and difficulty in walking not elsewhere classified.Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment indicated the resident required maximal assistance with showering and extensive assistance with other activities of daily living.Review of nursing documentation from 01/24/26 through 02/26/26 revealed Resident #32 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the hospital after visit summary, and staff interview, the failed to transcribe and implement hospital discharge orders. This affected one (Resident #21) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 69.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #21 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included necrotizing fasciitis, acute and chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. Resident #21 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned 02/27/26.Review of the hospital discharge after visit summary (AVS) for Resident #21 revealed an order dated 02/27/26 for Ciprofloxacin (an antibiotic) 500 milligrams (mg) every 12 hours for 13 doses and an order for vancomycin (an antibiotic) 125 mg four times a day for nine days. Additionally, the AVS revealed an order dated 02/27/26 to discontinue enoxaparin (an anticoagulant) 40 mg per 0.4 milliliters (ml) and hold Metformin (diabetes) 500 mg until 03/02/26.Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the hospital discharge summary, review of the self-reported incident (SRI), review of investigative documentation, review of documentation from the contracted company, review of the incident/accident log, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and monitoring following intravenous (IV) insertion by a contracted provider. This affected one (Resident #70) out of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 69.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 01/21/26 and a discharge date of 02/01/26. Diagnoses included syncope and collapse, muscle weakness generalized, cognitive communication deficit, expressive language disorder.Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12, indicating she was cognitively intact. The assessment indicated the resident required maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory orders and wound cultures were completed timely. This affected one (Resident #71) of three residents reviewed for laboratory tests. The census was 69.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including a fracture of the right humerus, wedge compression fracture of second lumbar vertebra, multiple fractures of ribs, thrombocytopenia, and hypertension. Resident #71 discharged from the facility on [DATE].Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated [DATE] for a complete blood count (CBC) and basic metabolic panel (BMP). Further review revealed no evidence the blood tests were completed as ordered. Review of the provider progress notes dated [DATE] revealed labs ordered on [DATE] were not completed. Further review of the physician orders revealed an order dated [DATE] for a CBC and BMP. Review of laboratory testing results revealed the labs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were served food that was palatable and at an appropriate temperature. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 65.Findings include:Observation on 01/14/26 at 12:08 P.M. after all resident room trays had been delivered, the test tray temperatures were obtained by the Dietary Manager (DM) #216. The beef macaroni casserole had a temperature of 131 Fahrenheit (F) and the mixed capri vegetables had a temperature of 120F.Review of the test tray on 01/14/26 at 12:10 P.M. with the Dietary Manager (DM) #216 revealed the beef macaroni casserole was lukewarm. DM #216 confirmed the beef macaroni casseroled should have had a much higher temperature reading. DM #216 stated he was surprised the vegetables did not taste even colder, related to the low temperature reading. DM #216 thought the improper temperatures of the test tray were related to how long the food cart sat on the unit prior to being served.Interview on 01/12/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen. This affected all 65 residents who receive food form the kitchen. The facility census was 65.Findings include:Observation on 01/12/26 at 8:40 A.M. during the initial tour of the kitchen revealed the ice machine was not working. Throughout the kitchen, including over food preparation areas, the ceiling tiles were heavily soiled with a black spotted substance. The ceiling vents throughout the kitchen were heavily soiled with dirt and debris. The tour continued to the dishwash machine room, and it revealed the gauges on the machine did not work. The Dietary Manager (DM) 216 was observed to run the dish machine five times and it did not reach an appropriate wash or rinse temperature. Observation of a large yellow light was hanging over a counter in the dish wash machine area. The yellow light was covered in numerous dead bugs. The floor under the dish wash machine and sink area were heavily soiled with dirt, debris, and grease. The floor was heavily soiled with a black…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility record review, resident record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to implement and maintain effective infection prevention and control practices by not consistently following required water management and Legionella control measures, by failing to ensure appropriate and readily available personal protective equipment in the laundry area, and by failing to prevent potential contamination during resident care and use of medical equipment, as evidenced by infection control concerns observed during incontinence care for Resident #68, a urinary catheter drainage bag observed resting on the floor for Resident #3. This affected two residents (#3, #68) of 65 residents with the potential to affect all 65 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 65.Findings include:1. Observation on 01/21/2026 between 10:54 AM and 11:02 AM with Maintenance Director #225 identified the hot water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER], identified as the farthest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, standards of care, and policy review, the facility failed to have adequate linens available for resident use. This had the potential to affect all 24 residents located on the first floor. The facility census was 65.Findings include: An interview on 01/12/26 at 11:39 A.M. with Resident #34 (resides on the first floor of the facility) revealed there were not enough towels and washcloths for residents to use to be showered as scheduled. An observation on 01/14/26 at 10:14 A.M. revealed the room on the first floor where linens were kept had 14 bath towels, no washcloths, no bed pads, and no fitted sheets. At the time of the observation, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #279 verified this was the only area clean linens were kept on the first floor. CNA #279 stated the staff could go to the laundry room to see if there were clean linens there. An observation on 01/14/26 at 10:21 A.M. of the laundry room revealed there were no dirty linens waiting to be washed and there was only one washer with items being washed. There were eight fitted sheets, eight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review the facility failed to complete initial care plan conferences and quarterly care plan conferences for residents and responsible parties as required. This affected seven residents (#4, #7, #13, #26, #27, #78, and #114) of 24 residents reviews. The facility census was 65.Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #114's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included moderate protein malnutrition, cystic fibrosis, ALS, anxiety, gastrostomy, chronic pain syndrome, major depression and functional quadriplegia. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact. He was dependent on staff for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, shower/bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and turning and repositioning. The resident was frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. Review of the care conferences revealed they were completed on 02/10/25 and not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete ordered treatments for Resident #7, failed to properly assess and address Resident #9's skin impairment to the toe, failed to initiate Resident #19's physician order dated 12/31/25 until 01/03/26, failed to ensure ordered TED hose were applied for Resident #24 for three days, failed to transcribe and implement discharge orders from the after visit summary (AVS) for Resident #25, failed to properly treat Resident #26's irritated skin as ordered, failed to complete ordered treatment to the buttocks for Resident #61, and failed to complete ordered treatment for Resident #83. This affected eight residents (#7, #9, #19, #24, #25, #26, #61, #83) out of 32 residents reviewed in the sample. The facility census was 65.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 06/06/25. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 66 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide a safe and homelike environment for residents including unsecured medications, fall prevention interventions, and functionality of facility doors. This affected five residents (#5, #10, #19, #31, #37) of five residents reviewed. The facility census was 65.Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #31 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included obstructive sleep apnea, asthma, depression, allergic rhinitis, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypothyroidism, peripheral vascular disease, anxiety disorder, and venous insufficiency. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 was cognitively intact. Resident #31 was dependent on staff for medication administration. Resident #31 required set up assistance from staff with eating, oral hygiene, toilet use, lower body dressing, putting on shoes, and personal hygiene. He required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to store and label oxygen and nebulizer equipment properly for eight residents (#5, #7, #8, #14, #26, #27, #61, #68) of 27 residents who utilizes oxygen or nebulizers. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date on 09/01/23 with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, respiratory failure, centrilobular emphysema, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, severe dementia, dysphagia, convulsions, and atherosclerotic heart disease. The resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of 2, reflecting severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive to total assistance with most activities of daily living and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 01/08/25 for oxygen at 1–2 liters per minute via nasal cannula every 12 hours as needed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all medications, including tuberculin solution, were accurately labeled and discarded upon expiration. This affected seven residents (#7, #19, #24, #57, #61, #64, #68) of 65 residents. The facility census was 65.Findings include: 1.Review of the medication carts and medication storage room on [DATE] at 3:04 PM by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #224 revealed multiple opened medications without documentation of the date they were opened, in violation of safe medication storage standards. Two medication carts and one medication room were reviewed. Observations included: Resident #7's insulin pen with no open date; Resident #64's Lotan eye drops open with no date; Resident #68's Albuterol open with no date; Resident #7's Tiotropium (Spiriva) open with no date; Resident #24 Advair inhaler (fluticasone/salmeterol) open with no date; Resident #19's Albuterol inhaler open with no date; Resident #61's Tiotropium open with no date;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the Medicare beneficiary notices and staff interview, the facility failed to notify two residents (#1, #49) of three Medicare beneficiary notices reviewed. The census was 65. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #1's Medicare beneficiary discontinuation of services letter revealed Resident #1 was notified on 08/05/25 of skilled services being discontinued on 08/08/25. The notification only identified skilled services were being cut on 08/08/25 and failed to identify the actual service. 2. Review of Resident #49's Medicare beneficiary discontinuation of services letter revealed Resident #49 was notified on 08/27/25 of skilled services being discontinued on 08/29/25. The notification is only identified skilled services were being cut on 08/29/25 and failed to identify the actual service. On 01/21/26 at 10:32 A.M. interview of the Social Service Director verified the Medicare beneficiary discontinuation of services letters for Residents #1, #49 were not specific to the service being discontinued.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to document a resident's discharge and develop a discharge plan for one Resident #74. This affected one resident (#74) of two residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census is 65.Findings include:Medical record review for Resident #74 revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a respite stay and discharged from the facility on 12/31/25 with Heartland Hospice. Her diagnoses included, gastro -intestinal hemorrhage, protein-calorie malnutrition, intestinal malabsorption, pulmonary hypertension, congestive heart failure (CHF), and hyperlipidemia. Resident #74 required a hospice stay. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #74 revealed she had moderately impaired cognition. She was dependent on staff for medication administration. Resident #74 required set up assistance from staff with eating. She required maximum assistance from staff with oral hygiene, toilet use, bathing, upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide a resident with a proper discharge including a discharge plan or summary. This affected one resident (#74) of two residents reviewed for discharge from the facility. The facility census is 65. Findings include:Medical record review for Resident #74 revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a respite stay and discharged from the facility on 12/31/25 with Heartland Hospice. Her diagnoses included, gastro -intestinal hemorrhage, protein-calorie malnutrition, intestinal malabsorption, pulmonary hypertension, congestive heart failure (CHF), and hyperlipidemia. Resident #74 required a hospice stay. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #74 revealed she had moderately impaired cognition. She was dependent on staff for medication administration. Resident #74 required set up assistance from staff with eating. She required maximum assistance from staff with oral hygiene, toilet use, bathing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) were updated after receiving new diagnoses. This affected three residents (#6, #12 and #65) of three residents reviewed for PASARR screening. The census was 65. Findings include:1.Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was not intact, she was dependent on staff for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, dressing, personal hygiene and turning and repositioning. She was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) dated 09/03/23 revealed a diagnosis of dementia. Further review revealed new diagnoses on 11/01/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were updated to ensure residents received comprehensive care and treatment. This affected three residents (#14, #55, and #61) out of 32 records reviewed in the sample. The facility census was 65. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 10/20/25. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute and chronic respiratory failure unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia, pulmonary hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, generalized muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, hypothyroidism, chronic kidney disease stage 3B, gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, essential (primary) hypertension, difficulty in walking not elsewhere classified, anemia, unspecified atrial fibrillation, heart failure unspecified, chronic diastolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL's) for dependent residents were completed. This affected three residents (#7, #26 and #65) of four residents reviewed for ADL care. The census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, morbid obesity, adult failure to thrive, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic resp failure, asthma, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, depression, personality disorder and PTSD. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was intact. She required set up or clean up assistance for eating, independent with oral hygiene, toileting, dressing and personal hygiene. Review of resident documented showers revealed no shower or bath documented between 11/12/25 and 11/19/25, and between 12/10/25 and 12/21/25. On 01/12/26 at 8:55 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the bowel protocol was followed for Resident #3. This affected one resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. The facility census was 65.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included necrotizing fasciitis, acute and chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact. The resident had an indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Plan of care dated 11/13/25 revealed Resident #3 had bowel incontinence. Interventions included to check and change the resident and encourage the resident to use the call light for toileting assistance. An additional plan of care dated 11/13/25 revealed Resident #3 had an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit. Interventions included that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure weight loss was adequately addressed for Resident #8 and proper follow up was completed after Resident #6 had significant weight loss. This affected two residents (#6, #8) of eight residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 65.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included neuropathy, sick sinus syndrome, dysphagia, congestive heart failure, urogenital implants, acute kidney failure, and anxiety disorder. Review of the plan of care for nutrition dated 10/22/25 revealed Resident #8 had the potential for altered nutrition related to past medical history of left femur fracture, anemia, anxiety, with varied intakes related to vomiting, recent surgery, and significant weight loss updated on 01/06/26. Interventions included house supplements as ordered, offer snacks as indicated, and diet, supplements, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to act upon the pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner. This affected three residents (#7, #24 and #32) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 65. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, severe protein calorie malnutrition, COPD, A FIB, depression, anxiety and weight loss. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed her cognition is intact, she is independent with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, shower/bathing, dressing and personal hygiene. Is occasionally incontinent of urine and continent of bowel. Review of Pharmacy Medication Regimen review revealed on 10/21/25 a recommendation to change Air Supra two puffs every six hours as needed. On 11/20/25 the order was written to change to albuterol inhaler two puffs every six 6 hours as needed. Further review revealed this order was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, pharmacy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medications. This affected one resident (#7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 65. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, morbid obesity, adult failure to thrive, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic resp failure, asthma, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, depression, personality disorder and PTSD. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was intact. She required set up or clean up assistance for eating, independent with oral hygiene, toileting, dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the physician orders revealed an order on 10/15/25 for Budesonide (corticosteroid) suspension 0.5 milligrams (mg)/2 milliliters (ml) inhale orally via nebulizer two times a day for shortness of breath…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, policy review, and manufacture instructions revealed the facility failed to prime an insulin pen for Resident #56, the facility also failed to correctly read the number of insulin units for Resident #41 and failed to administer pantoprazole granules appropriately for Resident #84. This affected three (Resident #56, #41, and #84) out of two residents with insulin pens on the first floor and four residents on the first floor that received insulin via an insulin syringe, and two residents on the first floor that received pantoprazole granules. The surveyor observed 25 opportunities for error with three actual errors resulting in a medication error rate of 12%. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #84 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease and aftercare for joint replacement.Review of physician orders revealed Resident #84 was ordered pantoprazole (proton pump inhibitor to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain ordered laboratory tests. This affected one resident (#24) of 38 residents reviewed for laboratory tests. The census was 65. Findings include; Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, severe protein calorie malnutrition, COPD, A FIB, depression, anxiety and weight loss. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition is intact, she is independent with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, shower/bathing, dressing and personal hygiene. Is occasionally incontinent of urine and continent of bowel. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 01/09/26 for a complete blood count (CBC), comprehensive metabolic profile (CMP), A1c (test for diabetes), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), vitamin B12 and vitamin D on 1/12/26. Further review revealed no evidence the blood tests were completed as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records. This affected two residents (#8, #48) of 24 residents reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included neuropathy, sick sinus syndrome, dysphagia, congestive heart failure, urogenital implants, acute kidney failure, and anxiety disorder. Plan of care for nutrition dated 10/22/25 revealed Resident #8 had the potential for altered nutrition related to past medical history of left femur fracture, anemia, anxiety, with varied intakes related to vomiting, recent surgery, and significant weight loss updated 01/06/26. Interventions included house supplements as ordered, offer snacks as indicated, and diet, supplements, and vitamins/minerals per physician order. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain hospice communication records/documentation for residents receiving hospice services. This affected two residents (#9, #68) out of two residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 65. Findings include:1. Medical record review for Resident #09 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included, obesity, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), essential primary hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, gout, dysphagia, anxiety, diabetes mellitus (DM), peritonitis, insomnia, and malignant neoplasm of the neck. Resident #09 required hospice services. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #09 dated 12/12/25 revealed she was mildly cognitively impaired. Resident #09 was dependent on staff for medication administration, and required supervision from staff with eating. Resident #09 required moderate assistance from staff with oral hygiene, toilet use, bathing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of infection surveillance records, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure antibiotic orders were thoroughly researched to determine if residents met the criteria for infections, failed to ensure when criteria was not met the prescriber was informed, and failed to provide education and reports regarding antibiotic use to prescribers in accordance with policies. This affected three residents (#3, #23, #56) of 11 residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included necrotizing fasciitis, acute and chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact and had an indwelling catheter. Review of the antibiotic stewardship tracking log revealed on 11/21/25 Resident #3 was ordered Macrobid (antibiotic) 100 milligrams…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure flu shots were completed properly. This affected three residents (#5, #26, #61) out of five residents reviewed for vaccines. The facility census was 65.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 06/06/25. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, obstructive sleep apnea, and morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had intact cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] score of 15) and no significant impairments to upper or lower extremity function but required set-up assistance for eating and oral hygiene and maximum or dependent assistance for other activities of daily living (ADLs). Additional documentation indicated the resident rejected care 1-3 days.Review of the immunization records for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-31 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure mail was delivered timely and on the weekends. This had potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 99. Findings include Interviews on 10/23/24 at 10:30 A.M. with Resident #1, #11, and #34 revealed resident's do not get mail passed on Saturday's. They revealed activity staff do not work on the weekends and they were the staff that pass the mail out. Interview on 10/28/24 at 1:30 P.M. with Receptionist #489 revealed facility gets mail on Monday through Saturday's. She revealed she distributes resident mail to the Activity Director who passes out the mail to the residents. She confirmed resident mail delivered on Saturday is kept either at the front desk or in the copy room until Monday. Interview on 10/28/24 at 2:48 P.M. with Activities Director #464 revealed facility did not have staff from activity department on weekends and Saturday mail is passed on Monday morning. Review of facility notice titled, Mail, dated 11/30/23 revealed residents shall be allowed to communicate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-31 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and record review, facility failed to ensure the Activity Director met minimum qualifications for the position. This had potential to affect all facility residents. Facility census was 99. Findings include: Interview on 10/28/24 around 2:00 P.M. with Activity Director (AD) #464 revealed she started 07/2024 and received about a day and a half of training. She revealed she had no prior history working in long term care or with activities or recreation. Interview on 10/28/24 at 2:48 P.M. with Activities Director #464 revealed she was working on a certification course for activities. She revealed the facility paid for the course and it should take about six months to complete. AD revealed she was on module five but was unable to show any evidence of any modules being completed and was unable to show a certificate of completion. Activity Director revealed from her knowledge, her hire was not conditional related to the certificate/training's being completed. Interview on 10/28/24 at 3:30 P.M. with Human Resources #506 acknowledged Activity Director #464 should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, staff interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive water management plan was in place for the prevention of Legionella, failed to follow proper infection control techniques during wound dressing changes, failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a resident with an indwelling medical device, and failed to complete tuberculosis test per the facility assessment. This affected two residents (#4 and #102) and had the potential to affect all 99 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of facilities Water Management Program Plan dated 01/26/18 revealed the facility must establish a water management team. The team consists of the facility administrator, maintenance director and infection preventionist. Review of the facilities Waterborne Pathogens Plan dated 09/04/24 revealed risk factors associated with Legionella bacteria are water flow, disinfection and water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of bed hold notices, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to include a daily room rate on bed hold notices for four residents (Residents #9, #37, #43, and #68) who were transferred to the hospital. This affected four residents (Residents #9, #37, #43, and #68) of four reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 99. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record Resident #37 revealed an admission date on 04/22/22. Medical diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, history of falling, repeated falls, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, mood (affective) disorder, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of clinical census revealed Resident #37 was hospitalized on [DATE]. Resident #37's payer source was a managed care insurance provider which supplied both Medicare and Medicaid coverage. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #37 had mildly impaired cognition and scored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for three residents (Residents #37, 43, and 51), failed to ensure medications were available for administration as ordered for one resident (Resident #62), and failed to promptly initiate timely treatment for one resident's (Resident #68) malfunctioning percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. This affected five residents (Residents #37, 43, 51, 62, and 68) of 27 residents reviewed for quality of care concerns. The facility census was 99. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record Resident #37 revealed an admission date on 04/22/22. Medical diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, history of falling, repeated falls, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, mood (affective) disorder, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #37 had mildly impaired cognition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and policy review the facility failed to enforce the smoking policy to ensure resident safety. This affected three ( Resident #92, #94, and #213) residents who were observed smoking and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure fall preventions were in place for one resident ( Resident #37) and failed to obtain neurological checks as scheduled after a fall for one resident ( Resident #43) out of six residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #92 revealed an admission date of 04/17/24 with mild cognitive deficits. Diagnoses included muscle abscess and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #92's care plan revealed Resident #92 is to go off the premises when he wants to smoke. Review of Resident # 92's Smoking evaluation dated 10/21/24, determined he is safe to smoke independently/unsupervised if he follows the facility's smoking rules. 2. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident, family, and staff interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure the residents who were at nutrition and/or hydration risk were provided with adequate assistance with meal and fluid intake, weights were obtained and monitored, and meal and fluid intakes were consistently documented. This affected six residents (Residents #4, #15, #55, #58, #68, and #100) of 12 residents reviewed for nutrition and hydration during the annual survey. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #15 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, quadriplegia, constipation, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/13/24 revealed Resident #15 had mildly impaired cognition. Resident #15 was totally dependent on staff for eating. The resident had a significant weight loss while not on prescribed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews, observations, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the residents were offered snacks in the evening. This affected Resident #1, #11, and #34 and had the potential to affect 96 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Interviews with Residents #1, #11 and #34 during the Resident Council meeting on 10/23/24 at 10:30 A.M. revealed the residents were not receiving snacks. Interview on 10/23/24 at 2:00 P.M. with the Director of Dietary Services (DDS) #512 and the Regional Dietary Manager #610 stated they do not prepare a snack cart for each unit. It was the responsibility of the nurses and or the state tested nursing aides (STNA) when a resident request a snack in between meals, they were to retrieve a snack in the nutrition rooms or from the kitchenette in each units dining room. DDS #512 stated she goes to the units and dining rooms routinely to ensure there was a supply of snacks. Observation and interview on 10/23/24 at 4:09 P.M. with STNA #610 revealed the second…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen and nutrition rooms were maintained in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 96 residents who the facility identified to receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Observations of the kitchen on 10/21/24 from 9:35 A.M. to 9:50 A.M. with Dietary Director of Services (DDS) #512 and Regional Director of Dietary #600 revealed throughout the kitchen area, there were knats flying around the entry way into the kitchen and in the dry storage area. This was verified by the DDS #512. Observation of the ice machine located in the kitchen revealed the shoot where the ice cubes travel to cups contained a black speckled substance when wiped with a clean white napkin. This was verified by Regional Director of Dietary #600. In the dry storage area, the area around the baseboards behind and under the shelves were covered with a dark brown, black, spotted and specks substances like dirt in the entire parameter of the room. In the kitchen area, there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect. This had the potential to affect one residents (Resident #22) out of two residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 99. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 11/09/18. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, failure to thrive, weakness, chronic pain, and diabetes. Review of progress note dated 02/14/22 revealed resident saw dentist with exam recommending extractions of #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, 11, #12, and #13 and have dentures made. Progress note dated 08/08/22 revealed appointment for [NAME] dental clinic for 09/01/22 at 1:00 P.M. Progress note dated 09/01/22 revealed resident was seen in the hallway when he should have been at his appointment. Resident informed social services that transportation could not locate the building and blamed social services. Resident also stated they would not see him due to not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within the resident's reach. This affected one (Resident #15) of three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Record review for Resident #15 revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, quadriplegia, schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/13/24, revealed Resident #15 had mildly impaired cognition. Resident #15 was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and eating. Review of the care plan dated 01/12/24 revealed Resident #15 was to have a disc call button on the left side of her head within reach so she can activate it as she turns her head to push it. Observation on 10/21/24 at 11:46 A.M. revealed Resident #15 was lying in bed and the call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, closed record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were returned upon discharge or account closure. This affected one resident (#363) of one reviewed for closed resident fund accounts. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #363 revealed an admission date of 11/19/22. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, diabetes, malnutrition, bipolar disorder, and delirium. Review of Resident #363's quarterly statements dated 01/23/24 revealed resident had $1,331.19 in the resident fund account. The statement reported the account was closed for this amount. Interview on 10/24/24 at 10:00 A.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #500 revealed she started at facility 07/2024 and revealed Resident #363 had discharged and closed the account. She revealed she had not found evidence of a check being provided to Resident #363 upon discharge. Interview on 10/24/24 at 11:45 A.M. with BOM #500 revealed facility had sent the account closure to facility administrator to approve the check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided spenddown notifications as required. This affected two Residents (#6, and #74) of six reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 99. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 03/30/15. Diagnoses included dementia, schizophrenia, nutritional anemia and diabetes. Review of resident personal fund statement dated 01/2024 revealed Resident #6 had a balance $1,987.16 and $1,953.36. Review of resident personal fund statement dated 02/2024 revealed Resident #6 had a balance $2003.82. Review of resident personal fund statement dated 03/2024 revealed Resident #6 had a balance $2053.82. Review of resident personal fund statement dated 04/2024 revealed Resident #6 had a balance $2054.82 and 2104.69. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 07/25/22. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, bipolar disorder, and mood disorder. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to notify the physician of a change of condition for one resident . This had the potential to effect one resident (#68) out of six residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 09/24/24 with no cognitive deficits. Diagnoses included diabetic II hypertension, hyperlipidemia and status post exploratory laparoscopy on 8/23/2024 with extensive lysis of additions, segmental small bowel resection with anastomosis and serosal repair of cecum. Complicated with persistent partial small bowel. Review of Resident #68 physician orders on 09/24/24 to 10/22/24 revealed she was receiving Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) Electrolytes Intravenous Concentrate (Parenteral Electrolytes) Use 1700 ml intravenously (IV) one time a day for TPN order. Infuse 1700 ml IV for 12 hours. Administer via central line. In addition, she was ordered a clear liquids diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure lighting issues were addressed timely for one Resident (#34) of one reviewed for lighting concerns. Facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 05/29/19. Diagnoses included alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, diabetes, acute osteomyelitis, cellulitis, diabetes, bipolar disorder, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact. Review of maintenance log dated 07/01/24 to 10/20/24 revealed no entries or mention of the over the bed light being out. Interview on 10/23/24 at 11:10 A.M. with Resident #34 revealed his over the bed light had been out for several weeks. Resident revealed he told the Maintenance Director #514 and was informed it was $2500 for the order and was waiting on approval from corporate. Observation and interview on 10/23/24 at 11:20 A.M. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, facility failed to ensure resident fund accounts were free from misappropriation. This affected one Resident (#22) of six reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 11/09/18. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, failure to thrive, muscle weakness and diabetes. Review of the Resident funds statement dated 01/2024 to 10/2024 for Resident #22, revealed resident received two separate pensions and social security income as deposits and three withdrawals which totaled all but $50 accounting for each month. Statement entry dated 09/19/24 revealed an additional $1,136.00 was removed from Resident #22's account which was the total balance leaving resident with $0.00 in the account. Review of email communication between Regional Business Office Manager (RBOM) #777 and Business Office Manager #500 acknowledged an extra withdrawal was made from Resident #22's personal fund account. RBOM #777 stated we are not allowed to withdrawal funds from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews and record review, facility failed to ensure resident had a care plan for dental care. This affected one Resident (#22) of 27 residents in the sample. Facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 11/09/18. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, failure to thrive, weakness, chronic pain, and diabetes. Review of progress note dated 02/14/22 revealed resident saw dentist with exam recommending extractions of #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, 11, #12, and #13 and have dentures made. Progress note dated 04/22/22 revealed a care conference was held and resident stated he wanted teeth extractions which he had declined a few weeks prior. Review of progress notes revealed no evidence of resident getting the extractions as needed. Review of physician orders for 04/22/24 revealed an order for dentist referral for two teeth extractions. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews and record review, facility failed to assist a resident in a timely manner with referrals for transfer. This affected one Resident (#22) of two reviewed for discharge. Facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 11/09/18. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, failure to thrive, weakness, chronic pain, and diabetes. Review of progress note dated 02/27/23 revealed resident wanted to move closer to [NAME], Ohio. Five referrals were sent with two not taking insurance, one with no beds and two with referrals pending. Progress note dated 03/01/23 revealed resident was updated on the referral status. It was discussed to send referrals to Columbus area and he said he would think about it. Progress note dated 01/22/24 revealed social services met with resident and daughter to discuss where they wanted Columbus, OH referrals sent, and three facility were requested. Progress note dated 01/26/24 revealed medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to consistently engage in effective communication with one resident (Resident #37) whose primary language was Spanish. This affected one (Resident #37) of three reviewed for language and communication. The facility census was 99. Findings Include: Review of the medical record Resident #37 revealed an admission date on 04/22/22. Medical diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, history of falling, repeated falls, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, mood (affective) disorder, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #37 had mildly impaired cognition and scored an 11 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #37's primary language was Spanish. Resident #37 required supervision or touching assistance with showering/bathing and ambulation. The resident required partial assistance from staff for toileting. Review of the care plan for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to adequately meet personal care needs which included shaving for Resident #33. This affected one (Resident #33) of two residents reviewed for shaving needs. The facility census was 99. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, obesity, dislocation of lumbar vertebra, bilateral osteoarthritis, and history of transient ischemic attack. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was cognitively impaired, had bilateral impairments on upper and lower extremities, and required maximum assistance from staff for personal hygiene needs. Review of the shower log revealed Resident #33 was scheduled to receive two showers per week, specifically on Fridays and Sundays. Review of shower/bath sheets revealed Resident #33 received a shower on 10/15/24, 10/18/24, 10/23/24, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided daily and to meet resident interests. This affected two Residents (#55 and #100) of two reviewed for activities. Facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 05/06/20. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, cognitive communication deficit, dysphasia, muscle weakness, and adjustment disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed preferences were marked as very important to listen to music, keep up on the news, and go outside to get fresh air, and somewhat important to do activities of interest. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was cognitively impaired and required set up assistance with eating, partial moderate assistance for personal hygiene, and substantial/maximum assistance for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized skin integrity program to ensure identification, interventions and treatments were initiated upon identification of the wound. This affected two (Resident #40 and #4) residents. Additionally, the facility failed to change a malfunctioning mattress timely for Resident #5. This affected three residents ( Resident #40, #4, and #5) out of three residents reviewed for skin integrity. The facility census was 99. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 03/13/24 with diagnoses not limited to intracapsular fracture of left femur, urinary tract infection, peripheral vascular disease, metabolic encephalopathy, history of transient ischemic attack, traumatic brain injury and dementia. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 had a memory problem, was severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, record review,and policy review, the facility failed to ensure orders for indwelling urinary catheters were in place for Resident #88 and #100. This affected two Residents (#88 and #100) of two reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #88 revealed an admission date of 06/22/24 with pertinent diagnoses of: type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic peripheral angiopathy, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage four, rheumatic mitral stenosis, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, encounter for attention to colostomy, lactose intolerance, weakness, acquired absence of right and left leg above knee, nicotine dependence, obstructive and reflux uropathy, hyperlipidemia, depression, hyperkalemia, presence of urogenital implants, and sepsis. Review of the 09/27/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident is cognitively intact and does not use and mobility devices to aid in mobility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to identify and care plan residents with Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD) to include non-pharma logical interventions to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization. This had the potential to effect one resident (#15) of one resident reviewed for diagnosis of PTSD. The census was 99. Findings include: Record review for Resident #15 revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, seizures, quadriplegia, constipation, schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/13/24, revealed Resident #15 had mildly impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 11/15. Resident #15 was noted to have a diagnosis of PTSD and resident assessed to be totally dependent on staff for bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed by the physician, including rational for not following recommendations. This affected two residents (Resident #11 and #15) out of five residents reviewed for un-necessary medications. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/29/23 with diagnoses that included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pyogenic arthritis, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, mood disorder, presence of artificial knee joint and infection of the surgical site infection right knee, and migraines. Review or Resident #11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 was cognitively intact and received insulin, antipsychotics, antianxiety, antidepressant, antibiotic, opioid, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who received multiple as needed pain medications had parameters in place to ensure pain medications were administered appropriately. This affected two (Residents #11 and #15) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/29/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pyogenic arthritis, chronic kidney disease, and migraines. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #11's current pain medications dated 10/2024 revealed orders for Oxycodone (treats moderate to severe pain) 10 milligrams (mg) every four hours as needed for pain and acetaminophen (treats minor aches and pain) 325 mg tablets give two tablets every four hours as needed for pain. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental services and follow up were provided timely to a resident. This affected one (Resident #22) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 99. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 11/09/18. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, failure to thrive, weakness, chronic pain, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the progress note dated 02/14/22 revealed Resident #22 saw the dentist with exam recommending extractions of #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, 11, #12, and #13 and have dentures made and a plan would be discussed with the resident once clearance from 360 dental. The progress notes revealed on 04/22/22, a care conference was held and Resident #22 stated he wanted teeth extractions, which he had declined a few weeks prior. The progress note dated 04/25/22 revealed a call was made to schedule extractions with 360 care. On 04/28/22, a follow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow guidance within their antibiotic stewardship program to ensure antibiotics were ordered appropriately. This affected two (Resident #10 and Resident #163) of three residents reviewed for antibiotic usage. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of facilities antimicrobial stewardship program mission statement dated 11/30/23 revealed the facility ensures that antibiotic medications are only used when truly necessary, and when prescribed, will be the best medication at the correct dose for the appropriate length of treatment. Our goal is to help reduce growing antibiotic resistance. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 01/15/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, chronic gastritis, and urinary incontinence. Review of the care plan dated 11/30/23 revealed Resident #10 had bladder incontinence due to impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, review of facility policy, and observations, the facility failed to ensure they had a functional call light system and call lights were kept within reach. This affected two (Residents #31 and #55) of three residents reviewed for call light systems. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 02/08/24. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, depression, bilateral osteoarthritis of knee and bed confinement status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 was cognitively impaired, had bilateral impairments in the lower extremities, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, and was incontinent of urine. Review of the care plan dated 02/20/24 revealed Resident #31 was at a fall risk due to impaired mobility and incontinence. Interventions included to explain and remind the resident of non-compliance with ambulation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to put treatments in place in a timely manner when Resident #21 developed three non-pressure related ulcers. This affected one (Resident #21) of three residents reviewed for skin impairment. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Closed medical record review revealed Resident #21 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 08/13/24. Diagnoses included cystitis, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic pain, and erythema intertrigo (skin condition). The Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact. Resident #21 had no pressure, venous, or arterial ulcers and had no other skin problems. Review of the hospital discharge records dated 07/11/24 revealed Resident #21 had pain and redness in lower abdominal skin folds and genital area. The admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had a blister to right great toe, fungal infection under left breast that measured 0.1 centimeters…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy and resident rights, resident and staff interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping and maintenance services were provided to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable interior. This affected one resident (#75) and had the potential to affect an additional 36 residents (Resident #2, #3, #5, #8, #9, #11, #12, #19, #22, #23, #25, #26, #30, #32, #33, #35, #36, #40, #41, #43, #48, #49, #59, #62, #64, #65, #69, #71, #74, #83, #84, #85, #86, #91, #92, and #94) who resided on the second floor. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/20/22. Diagnoses included depression, muscle weakness, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #74 was cognitively intact and required maximum assistance from staff with bathing. Observation on 08/19/24 at 12:13 P.M. of the second-floor community shower room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain the nourishment room's refrigerators in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected two of two nourishment rooms. This had the potential to affect all 104 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 07/12/24 at 10:45 A.M. of the first-floor nourishment room revealed the white reach in refrigerator contained a bag with various foods dated 07/01/24, several small white bowls with a white food resembling mashed potatoes not dated, several opened containers of drinks undated, and a black bowl containing beans and a brown meat undated. Housekeeping Supervisor #272 verified the outdated food in the refrigerator. Observation on 07/12/24 at 11:21 A.M. of the second-floor nourishment room revealed the white reach in refrigerator had a brown substance spilled in the bottom of the refrigerator. There were multiple containers of undated and outdated food and an expired carton of milk. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #208 verified the multiple containers of undated and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the flooring was in good repair and safe in the second floor nourishment room for the residents to use. This affected one of two nourishment rooms. This had the potential to affect the 58 residents residing on the second floor. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Observation on 07/12/24 at 11:21 A.M. of the second floor nourishment room revealed multiple floor tiles with missing pieces resulting in raised edges. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #208 at the time of the observation verified the missing pieces of tile and verified the raised edges posed a trip hazard to residents utilizing the nourishment room. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00155460.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of 30-day notice, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the 30-day discharge notice documented the location of discharge. This affected one (Resident #90) of two residents revived for 30-day discharge notice. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an initial admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included fracture of left femur, displaced fracture of fourth/fifth metatarsal bone of left foot, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus, obesity, anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease, alcohol abuse, major depressive disorder, chronic pain, and nicotine dependence psychoactive substance abuse. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the 30-day notice issued to Resident #90 dated [DATE] revealed the discharge notice was given due to the safety of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident medications not prepared ahead of administration time and failed to store over the counter (OTC) medications appropriately with name, the original manufacturer's or pharmacy-applied label indicating the medication name, strength, quantity, accessory instructions, lot number, and expiration date when applicable. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure medications were under direct observation of the person administering the medication or locked in the medication storage area/cart. This affected one of four hallways. This affected three residents (#63, #91, and #97). The facility census was 104. Findings include: Observations on 07/12/24 from 8:47 A.M. to 9:47 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #216 had two resident's (#91 and #97) morning medications prepared in clear plastic cups sitting on top of the medication storage cart. There were two multi use bottles of Miralax (OTC medication) sitting on top of the medication storage cart. Interview with RN #216 during the time of the observation verified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were handled and distributed a sanitary manner. This affected two residents (#63 and #99) of four residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Observation of medication administration on 07/12/24 at 9:04 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #216 was preparing Resident #99's medication and dropped the Eliquis (blood thinner) on the top of the medication storage cart. RN #216 then picked the medication up with her bare hands and placed the medication into a clear plastic cup. RN #216 then entered Resident #99's room and administered the medication Eliquis to Resident #99. Observation of RN #216 at 9:47 A.M. revealed the RN prepared Resident #63's morning medication dropping one Zealot (antidepressant) 25 milligram (mg) tablet on the top of the medication storage cart. RN #216 picked the medication up with her bare hands and placed it into the cup. ADON #247 alerted RN #216 to remove the tablet from the cup as it touched the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and pharmacy contract review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive medical record review was completed to identify irregularities with prescribed medications during the monthly pharmacy medication regimen review (MRR). This affected one resident (Resident #105) of five residents reviewed for anticoagulant medication use. The facility census was 103. Findings Include: Review of medical record for Resident #105 revealed an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a history of stroke, atrial fibrillation (Afib), type two diabetes mellitus, and breast cancer. Further review revealed Resident #105 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks and transfers, was non-ambulatory using a wheelchair for mobility and was verbally able to make needs known to staff. Review of Resident #105's care plan, dated 04/13/23, revealed the use of anticoagulant therapy to treat atrial fibrillation with a goal of no adverse effects and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were handled and distributed in a sanitary manner. This affected two residents (#12, #25 and #34) out of four residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 103. Findings Include: 1. An observation on 06/03/24 from 8:45 A.M. to 9:03 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #264 performing medication administration for Residents #12, and #25. LPN #264 prepared Resident #12's morning medication at the medication cart, knocked and entered Resident #12's room and administered the medication. Upon completion of Resident #12's medication administration, LPN #264 exited the room without washing or sanitizing his hands. Once LPN #264 returned to the medication cart and began preparing Resident #25's medication without sanitizing his hands. LPN #264 completed preparation of Resident #264's medication, LPN #264 knocked and entered Resident #25's room and administered the medication. LPN #264 then exited Resident #25's room without washing or sanitizing his hands. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of a Self-Reported Incident, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #125 was treated with dignity and respect. This affected one resident (#125) of four residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #125 revealed an admission date of 01/10/24 and a discharge date of 01/26/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, toxic encephalopathy, borderline personality disorder, and hypertension. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/17/24, revealed Resident #125 had intact cognition. Review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI) form for SRI tracking number 243250, dated 01/19/24, revealed an allegation of neglect and emotional or verbal abuse was made by Resident #125. She alleged to a third party that Former State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #802 refused to clean up her spilled water and to provide her with new ice water. The allegation was reported to the Administrator and Former…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an incident of potential misappropriation and verbal abuse. This affected two (Resident #46 and #51) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census is 113. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 04/13/23 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction due to embolism, human immunodeficiency virus, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/31/23, revealed Resident #51 had intact cognition. Review of the progress note, dated 01/11/24, revealed Resident #51 was complaining about her former roommate, (Resident #46) and stated she had taken her green blanket. Resident #51 continued to scream at Resident #46 as caregivers prevented Resident #51 from entering Resident #46's room. Later, Resident #51 called her daughter and she stormed the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of facility investigations, review of Self-Reported Incidents, staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate incidents of potential abuse. This affected four residents (#46, #51, #84, and #101) out of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 113. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 01/04/24 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder, diaphragmatic hernia, depression, and anxiety. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/11/24, revealed Resident #84 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI) form for SRI tracking number 242911, revealed the date of discovery was 01/09/24. The form further revealed an allegation of physician and emotional or verbal abuse was made by Resident #84. Resident #84 alleged that while providing care, two State Tested Nursing Assistant's (STNA) hurt her stomach and made her apologize for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete wound care as ordered. This affected one (Resident #120) of four residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #120 revealed an admission date of 09/16/23 and discharge date of 12/27/23 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot, open wound of right lower leg, peripheral vascular disease, venous insufficiency, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/30/23, revealed Resident #120 had intact cognition. She had a diabetic foot ulcer and moisture associated skin damage (MASD). Review of the plan of care, dated 09/19/23, revealed Resident #120 had the potential for alteration in skin integrity related to immobility, obesity, and her diagnoses. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, administering treatments as ordered, providing the diet according to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected one (Resident #101) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #101 revealed an admission date of 11/28/20. Resident #101's medical diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, muscle weakness, and depression. Review of Resident #101's physical chart on 01/30/24 at 8:10 A.M. revealed a flagged handwritten order from a psychiatric Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) for Melatonin three milligrams (mg) daily at bedtime and to add a diagnosis to Resident #101's medical record of hypersomnia (excessive daytime sleepiness). The order for melatonin three mg at bedtime and the diagnosis of hypersomnia were not pressent in Resident #101's electronic health record. Observation on 01/30/24 at 6:44 A.M. revealed Resident #101 in bed with the room lights off. Resident #101 appeared to be asleep. Subsequent observations the on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled. This affected one (#81) of three residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #81 revealed admission date 12/20/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and encounter for antineoplastic radiation therapy. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #81 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident required partial/moderate assistance for activities of daily living. Review of care plan dated 12/21/23 revealed Resident #81 preferred showers. Further review of care plan dated 12/21/23 revealed Resident #81 prefers to be washed up at sink by his wife. Provide limited assist (supervision or touching assistance) with bathing. Review of After…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #385's advance directive in the electronic medical record was accurate. This affected one (#385) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #385 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/02/21, revealed Resident #385 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the care plan, dated 10/27/21, revealed Resident #385 was a Full Code. The intervention stated the staff would treat the Resident #385 as a Full Code. Review of the paper chart revealed Resident #385's Advanced Directive, dated 11/02/21, was listed as Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care-Arrest (DNRCCA) (the protocol is activated when the patient experiences cardiac or respiratory arrest). Review of the electronic medical record, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain clean floors, tables, and privacy curtains in the resident's rooms. This affected two (#48 and #64) of two residents reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/04/21, revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Observation on 11/15/21 at 11:17 A.M. revealed Resident #48's privacy curtain was dirty. Subsequent observation on 11/18/21 at 9:39 A.M. revealed Resident #48's privacy curtain had a large brown spot. Interview on 11/18/21 at 9:39 A.M. with Resident #48 stated she had complained to multiple staff a month or two ago including State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were locked when unattended. This had the potential to affect two (#59 and #61) of 21 residents residing on second floor unit. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Observation on 11/15/21 at 11:16 A.M. revealed a medication cart on the second floor unit on the resident's hallway. The medication cart was unlocked and the keys to the cart were laying on top of the cart. No staff were observed in the hallway. Interview on 11/15/21 at 11:18 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #371 confirmed she left the medication cart unlocked and unattended with the keys on top when she walked into a resident's room. RN #371 confirmed the cart should have been locked and keys secured before walking away from the cart. Review of the facility list of residents on the second floor revealed there were 21 residents residing on this unit. Resident #59 and #61 who resided on the second floor were identified by the facility to be mobile and confused. Review of the facility's policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$197,547 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $52,992 — penalty dated 2024-10-31
- $128,935 — penalty dated 2024-06-12
- $15,620 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-11 for 5 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| PACS GROUP, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/04/2025 |
| PACS HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/04/2025 |
| PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| DUTIEL, BRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| 4075 W DUBLIN-GRANVILLE ROAD OH OWNER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| SNF OH HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELL INTEGRA MASTER JV LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELL PM HOLDCO JV LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| MCELDOWNEY, THOMAS | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $482K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366418. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.