No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ridgeway Post Acute

523 Hayes Lane, Petaluma, CA 94952 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 79 certified beds · (707) 763-2457 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (707) 763-2457 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)3 actual-harm citations$32,280 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $32,280 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-16)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
5 Keller St Ste A-7 · (707) 782-6500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
401 Kenilworth Dr · (707) 775-6323 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
741 Western Ave · (707) 765-0652 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1008 G St · (707) 778-4380 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.7%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.9%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.6%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.6%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.1%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.8%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.8%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.7%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.2%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.4%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.812.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.741.571.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.7%CMS range 36.4–57.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 8.2–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge71.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge60.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.6%CMS range 5.8–14.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.241.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.69
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
36.4%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 74.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-27)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2022-08-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided foot care, including timely toenail trimming when Resident 1's toenails were allowed to grow too long. This failure resulted in Resident 1 acquiring cellulitis (a skin infection that causes swelling and redness) and ingrown toenails (occurs when the edge of the toenail grows into the surrounding skin, causing pain, redness, and swelling) to all toes, which led to the physician to perform matrixectomy (a surgical procedure that removes the growth area of an ingrown toenail) of all toenails on 4/10/25. This failure also resulted in Resident 1 experiencing pain and fear of further pain due to the long and ingrown toenails and the long wait before a physician could provide care for his toenails. Findings: A review of Resident 1s face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated Resident 1 admitted to the facility in November of 2024 with diagnoses including intracerebral hemorrhagic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the rights of one of two residents (Resident 5) when Resident 5 ' s medical decision-maker, Family Member 2 (FM2) was not asked or notified before starting to give Resident 5 a new pain medication MS (morphine sulphate) Contin (a long-acting pain medication made with morphine, an opiate). This failure resulted in Resident 5 becoming over sedated (state of calmness, relaxation, or sleepiness), requiring naloxone (a medication that reverses the potentially deadly effects of opiate toxicity), when he was administered a new medication before FM2 had been given a chance to consider the risks and benefits or permission for them to give it to him. Finding: During a telephone interview on 7/24/24 at 10 a.m., FM2 stated Resident 5 was riddled with arthritis (joint pain) particularly in his neck and knee. FM2 stated Resident 5 had been prescribed Norco (brand name for a pain medication made with acetaminophen and hydrocodone [an opiate]) scheduled twice daily until about four or six months ago when he was assigned a new doctor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on a stat (immediately, urgent) laboratory (lab, a facility that provides controlled conditions in which scientific or technological research, experiments, and measurement may be performed) order for one of two sampled residents (Resident 5) when a stat urinalysis (UA, a basic test that examines the contents of a urine sample to identify conditions that may need treatment) and culture and sensitivity (C&S, a lab test that checks which bacteria are in the urine and which antibiotic will kill the bacteria) specimen for Resident 5 was rejected by the lab on 7/15/24 and a new urine specimen was not collected. This failure caused a delay in diagnosis and treatment for Resident 5, which caused his health to worsen requiring hospitalization on 7/16/24 where he was diagnosed with septic shock (sepsis [a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection] may progress to septic shock, a dramatic drop in blood pressure that can damage the lungs, kidneys, liver and other organs) and acute cystitis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-18 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the rights of three of 18 sampled residents (Residents 11, 12, and 23) were considered when nursing staff did not inform them of the medications being administered during their medication administration process. This failure limited the residents' ability to participate in their care, ask questions, and make informed decisions regarding the medications they received. 1. A review of Resident 11's admission record (facility demographic) indicated she was admitted to the facility in January 2026 with medical diagnosis which included malignant neoplasm of the vulva (cancer that originates in the external female genitalia) and acute diastolic (congestive) heart failure (when the heart muscle becomes stiff and does not relax). A review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 4/24/26, indicated her Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS-a cognition [the processes of thinking and reasoning] assessment)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an abuse allegation between Residents 1 and 2 was reported to the state licensing/certification agency (the state) within 2 hours. This failure could put the residents at significant risk for continued harm, which could lead to severe physical and psychological trauma.Findings:A review of Resident 1's face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date in 12/2017 with a diagnosis of Schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).A review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident), dated 6/27/25, score was 10 indicating Resident 1 had moderately impaired thinking and memory.A review of Resident 2's face sheet indicated an admission date in 9/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the Long Term Care Ombudsman (ombudsman, an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities) for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3 was discharged from the facility and admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and again on 8/12/25. This failure put Resident 3 at risk for unsafe discharge. Findings:During an interview on 8/20/25 at 2:14 p.m., the Minimum Data Set coordinator (MDSC) stated the Ombudsman needs to be notified when a resident was sent or discharged to the hospital. The MDSC stated this was the residents' right and for their safety.During an interview on 8/20/25 3:27 p.m., the Director of Staff Development (DSD) stated the facility should notify the Ombudsman when residents are discharged to home or transferred to the hospital. The DSD stated if the Ombudsman was not notified of a discharge or transfer, it could leave the resident vulnerable to an unsafe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable, homelike environment for one of four sampled residents (Anonymous Witness 1) when, after repeated complaints, the facility continued to use a floral-scented air freshener near Anonymous Witness 1's bedroom.This deficient practice resulted in Anonymous Witness 1 experiencing headaches and episodes of throat irritation and had the potential to offend or harm other residents of the facility. Findings:A review of Anonymous Witness 1's admission Record, dated 8/8/25, indicated Anonymous Witness 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including respiratory failure (a condition where there's not enough oxygen or too much carbon dioxide in the body), acute bronchitis (an inflammation of the bronchial tubes, the airways that carry air to your lungs) & pulmonary hypertension (a condition where blood pressure in the pulmonary arteries [vessels carrying blood from the heart to the lungs] is abnormally high).A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 1) of four samples residents was treated with dignity and respect when Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) made a humiliating comment to Resident 1 in front of residents and staff. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling embarrassed and humiliated. The findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated admission to the facility in September 2016 with diagnosis which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), chronic pain syndrome (persistent pain), osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage) of the left knee, hoarding disorder (a mental health condition characterized by a person who excessively gathers things) and major depressive disorder (a mental health condition characterized by symptoms like sadness, loss of interest and low energy). A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 5/16/25, indicated Resident 1 had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) a homelike environment when the window sill and blinds were in need of repair and there was peeling paint on a wall in his room. These failures had the potential to negatively impact Resident 1's comfort and create an environment that was not homelike. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was admitted in 10/24 with organ-limited amyloidosis (a condition characterized by the presence of proteins lodged in the body's tissues which can affect the entire body and cause a large range of varying symptoms, including appetite loss to bleeding). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 3/18/25, indicated he had no memory impairment. During a concurrent interview and observation on 6/3/25 at 1:41 p.m. with Resident 1 in his room, the window sill of his room's window had two areas of missing or damaged wood, each approximately 6 inches (in., a unit of measurement) in length.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure two out of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3) received services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene (the practices and habits that maintain cleanliness and promote health by preventing the spread of germs and disease) when: 1. Residents 2 and Resident 3 were not provided regular nail trimming and nail care , and 2. Resident 3 did not receive showers or bed baths as scheduled. These failures could result in discomfort, potential skin impairments, and infection. Findings: A review of Resident 2's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with a diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS- a chronic, progressive disease involving damage to the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord) and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 2's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs-routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a pain management plan was developed for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who was at a high risk of experiencing pain when he had ingrown toenails (occurs when the edge of the toenail grows into the surrounding skin, causing pain, redness, and swelling) and after he underwent matrixectomy (a surgical procedure that removes the growth area of an ingrown toenail) to of all his toenails on 4/10/25. This failure resulted to Resident 1 experiencing pain on his toes from the ingrown toenails and after the matrixectomy procedure to all toes. Findings: A review of Resident 1s face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in November of 2024 with diagnoses including intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke (when bleeding occurs in the brain) and muscle weakness. A review of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of professionals from different disciplines who collaborate to provide comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and enhance the sense of well-being for two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 6) of four sampled residents when facility staff did not verify Resident 1 and Resident 6 wore their own clothing. This failure resulted in Resident 1 showing up to a family party during the holidays wearing women ' s clothes and Resident 6 feeling disrespected and sad. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated he was admitted in 3/8/23 with diagnoses which included dementia (a group of conditions that cause loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life). A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 12/11/24, indicated he had severe memory impairment. A review of Resident 3 ' s admission record indicated he was admitted in 10/8/24 with diagnoses which included amyloidosis (a rare, inherited disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident 1, Resident 2 and Resident 4) of four sampled residents who lost personal items at the facility had their items located, replaced or reimbursed. These failures had the potential to result in feelings of frustration, loss of control, and uncertainty, which could have affected the residents ' comfort at the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated admission to the facility on 3/8/23 with diagnoses which included dementia (a group of conditions that cause loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life). A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 12/11/24, indicated Resident 1 had severe memory impairment. A review of Resident 2 ' s admission record indicated admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for one resident (Resident 1) of two sampled residents when licensed nurses did not communicate Resident 1's treatment orders written by a Wound Care Physician Assistant (PA - a licensed medical professional whose duties include ordering labs, medications, and treatments) for a wound on the left heel to the Attending Physician (a physician who is responsible for a patient's care in a hospital or skilled nursing facility) for approval and a signature. This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure Resident 1's wound care treatments were ordered and carried out. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with relevant diagnoses including: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disease that occurs when blood sugar is too high) with Diabetic Polyneuropathy (a complication of diabetes that affects nerves that branch out from the spinal cord to the arms, hands, legs, and feet),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed when: 1. Proper handwashing was not followed in the kitchen; 2. The proper cool down process of food and Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) process were not monitored; 3. The facility's thawing process for food was not followed; 4. The potential for cross contamination was not prevented; 5. Cleaning cloths were not placed in sanitizing solution between use; 6. Hair restraints were not utilized; 7. Food storage guidelines were not followed; 8. Food preparation equipment and utensils were not clean and kept in good working order; 9. Kitchen cleaning equipment was not stored properly; 10. Kitchen equipment and the environment were not clean; 11. Ice packs intended for resident personal use were stored with food in the resident nourishment refrigerator and a medication temperature log was used to monitor the temperature of the resident nourishment refrigerator; and, 12. The posted time for immersion of dishes in a sanitizing solution during manual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect when: 1. A staff member was observed standing while assisting a resident with meals; and, 2. Three staff were observed speaking a language other than English by the dining room of the facility during lunch hour. These findings had the potential for residents to experience feelings of sadness, frustration, and helplessness for a census of 76 residents. Findings: 1. During an observation in the dining room of the facility on 9/23/24 at 12:25 p.m., the Unlicensed Staff M was observed assisting Resident 67 with her lunch meal while standing. The Resident 67 sat in her wheelchair, while the Unlicensed Staff M was observed looking down at Resident 67 while assisting with her meal. After a few minutes of this process, another unidentified staff brought Unlicensed Staff M a chair to sit on. During an interview on 9/23/24 at 12:56 p.m., Unlicensed Staff M confirmed she was standing while assisting Resident 67. The Unlicensed Staff M also stated staff could stand or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly respond and ensure resolutions for concerns brought-up during resident council meetings for a sample of 13 residents. This failure had the potential to result in unresolved patient care concerns, and feelings of frustration and loss of control for the residents of the facility. Findings: During a resident council meeting attended by 13 residents on 9/25/24 at 10:35 a.m., Resident 2 stated the facility did not always respond or resolve issues discussed during the meetings. Resident 2 also stated when the facility did resolve an issue, it was not done promptly, as it was usually done the day before the next monthly resident council meeting. A review of the July 2024 resident council minutes indicated a meeting was conducted on 7/10/24, in which residents complained they could hear staff speaking in their native language in the halls and residents' rooms, and two residents were upset that staff were speaking in Spanish only. A review of a facility document attached to the July 2024 resident council minutes titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the location of the survey results in a easily noticeable manner. This failure decreased the facility's potential to honor the rights of 76 residents to examine the facility's survey results. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/25/24 at 12:20 p.m., the Activities Director stated she did not discuss where to find the survey binder during regular resident council meetings. The Activities Director shared with the surveyor the location of the survey binder. The survey binder was observed on the shelf of a small table located in the entrance lobby, covered with dust, and unlabeled with any type of information. There were no postings around this area to indicate the survey binder was there. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/25/24 at 12:25 p.m., the DON confirmed the survey binder did not include the survey results of complaints or facility reported incidents investigated after January 2023. During an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for residents when: 1. Two of three shower rooms were being used as storage; and, 2. The facility's smoking area dirty and unkempt. These failures made the shower rooms and smoking area uncomfortable and not a homelike environment. Findings: 1. During the Resident Council meeting and interviews on 9/25/24, at 10:55 AM, Resident 232 and Resident 2 stated the water in the shower room by the Merlot Hall was scalding hot. The residents stated water in the shower room by the Chablis Hall was cold and the shower room was being used as a storage room. The shower room by the Burgundy Hall was the only shower often used. A review of the Resident Council meeting minutes, dated 5/15/24 at 2:15 PM, indicated residents discussed the shower room at the Chablis Hall was being used as storage instead of being used as extra shower room; the Merlot shower did not work well because the water temperature was difficult to adjust. During an observation of the shower rooms and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide its residents a safe and functional environment free of accident hazards when water temperatures measured above 120 degreed Fahrenheit (F) in two showers and seven resident rest room faucets. These failures increased the risk of scalds or burns from hot faucet water and showers for a census of 76 residents. Findings: During the Resident Council meeting and interviews on 9/25/24, at 10:55 AM, Resident 232 and Resident 2 stated the water is scalding hot at the shower room by the Merlot Hall. A review of the Resident Council meeting minutes, indicated the following resident concerns were discussed on the following dates: - 1/17/24 at 2:10 PM: Merlot Hall shower still too hot; - 5/15/24 at 2:15 PM: Shower in Chablis being used as storage instead of being used as extra shower room. Merlot shower did not work well, temperature was hard to get just right; - 6/19/24 at 2:06 PM: Maintenance Supervisor responded Chablis shower has a broken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet residents needs for three of nine residents (Residents 39, 46 and 53) when: 1. Licensed Nurse A (LN A) did not identify Resident 39 prior to administering his morning medications on 9/24/24. 2. Resident 39's physician's order and Medication Administration Record (MAR) for a Lidocaine Patch (a topical medication for pain relief) did not follow the medication's package insert instructions for use. 3. The LN B administered a different resident's Metformin (a medication to treat diabetes/high blood sugar) to Resident 46. 4. The LN B administered Tylenol (a pain medication) to Resident 46 but did not document the medication administration on Resident 46's MAR. These failures decreased the facility's potential to safely administer medications and prevent harmful side effects to residents. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation and concurrent interview with LN A on 9/24/24, at 8:30 a.m., the LN A stated Resident 39 had an order for Lidocaine Patch 5% to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1) Remove an unsampled discharged resident's medication from the medication cart and medications for four residents (Resident 25, Resident 69, Resident 27, and Resident 10) were not placed in their proper storage; and, 2) Maintain the temperature in the medication room between 68 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 77 degrees F. These failures resulted in Resident 46 being administered Resident 27's medication and decreased the facility's potential to appropriately store medications. Findings: During an observation and inspection of the medication cart for the Burgundy Hall, and concurrent interview with Licensed Nurse B on 9/25/24 at 10:24 AM, the following were noted: - An Unsampled Resident's medication packet of Gabapentin (medication used to treat seizures or nerve pain) 300 mg (milligrams, a unit of weight) capsules was stored among Resident 69's medication. Licensed Nurse B confirmed the unsampled resident's medication was not removed from the cart after discharge from the facility over the weekend. - Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the following: 1. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) ensured kitchen staff were competent in their job specific duties; and, 2. The Registered Dietitian (RD) did not have adequate oversight of the kitchen functions. These failures decreased the facility's potential to provide safe food handling and santiation for 76 residents who received preared food from the kitchen. Findings: A review of the facility document titled Diet Order Tally Report dated 9/23/24 showed 76 residents received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. During the CMS recertification survey from 9/23/24 to 9/27/24, [NAME] F did not adhere to the following required job duties: -Appropriate hand hygiene, -Monitoring the cool down process for TCS (time temperature control for safety food), food that need to be kept at specific temperatures to prevent bacteria growth and foodborne illnesses, -Adhering to the facility thawing guidelines, -Prevention of the potential for cross contamination while preparing food, -Proper storage of cleaning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Follow the recipe for Pacific Rim Pork Roast and Carrots with Parsley and 2. Ensure the resident meals were flavorful, appetizing, and cooked meat was tender for 76 residents who were served food from the kitchen. This deficiency decreased the facility's potential to serve palatable food and could lead to unintended weight loss due to reduced oral intake. Findings: 1. A review of a facility document titled Diet Order Tally Report dated 9/25/24 indicated: 7 residents received a dysphagia mechanical diet, 12 residents received a mechanical soft diet, 5 residents received a puree diet, and 52 residents received a regular diet. In a concurrent observation and interview on 9/24/24 at 11:19 a.m. with the [NAME] F and the Registered Dietician (RD), the [NAME] F stated was going to prepare five servings of pureed Pacific Rim Pork Roast. The [NAME] F was observed to do the following: -Added two pieces of cooked pork roast (one weighed 5 ounces (oz, a measure of weight) and the second weighed 6 oz for a total of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff and resident visitors were educated on safe food handing practices and food brought to the facility from the outside for resident consumption had the option to be heated. These failures had the potential for unsafe food handling which could lead to food borne illness and resident preferences not honored regarding food temperature for 76 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 9/25/24 at 3:31 PM an interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse L (LN L). The LN L was asked to describe the process when visitors brought food from the outside for residents. The LN L confirmed outside food was never heated and if food was removed from the refrigerator, it must be discarded. When asked if she had been trained on safe food handling LN L stated the Director of Staff Development (DSD) was responsible for training. On 9/25/24 at 3:37 PM an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON confirmed food from outside could not be heated. When asked if facility staff and visitors were educated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary storage area when one dumpster was overflowing with trash and its lid was unable to be closed, and the immediate area was strewn with trash and dirty resident equipment. This failure increased the potential to harbor and breed pathogens (organisms causing disease) and attract pests (insects and rodents). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) on 9/23/24 at 10:37 AM, the following were observed in the outside trash storage area: - empty cardboard boxes on the ground, - two mop buckets stored on the ground with dirty mops inside the buckets, - a broom, a squeegee, and an electric floor cleaner stored on the ground, - an overturned milk crate with an uncoiled hose underneath it on the ground, - debris, litter, plastic bags, and a wash rag on the ground, - a paint roller in a plastic bag on the ground, - an empty chemical container on the ground, - two bedframes, three wheelchairs, three commodes, one mattress, and other unidentified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility document and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was maintained in proper working order when the ice machine was not clean and the manufacturer's guidelines were not followed. This failure had the potential for equipment to not function the way it was intended. Findings: On 9/23/24 at 11:04 AM, an observation of the facility ice machine located in the kitchen dry storeroom and concurrent interview was conducted with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS). The MS stated he cleaned the ice machine monthly and that the ice machine was last cleaned on 8/13/24. Upon inspection of the internal components of the ice machine, the ice harvester (area ice was produced) curtain, ice sensor and ice harvester had black residue that came off when wiped with a paper towel. The MS confirmed the findings. The MS was asked how he cleaned the ice machine. The MS stated he removed all internal components and cleaned them with a mixture of ice machine cleaner and water. The MS stated he filled up a bucket with half ice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences were honored for one resident (Resident 4) of 18 sampled residents when Resident 4 disliked pasta but was served pasta for lunch. This failure decreased the facility's potential to honor residents' preferences. Findings: On 9/23/24 at 12:34 P.M. a lunch meal observation was conducted with Resident 4. Resident 4's lunch meal tray was delivered by Unlicensed Staff J. Resident 4's lunch meal consisted of spaghetti with meat sauce, spinach, dinner roll and ice cream. Unlicensed Staff J confirmed Resident 4 did not like pasta. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) was notified and Resident 4's meal tray was removed. The CDM delivered another lunch meal tray with rice instead of pasta. On 9/26/24 at 9:23 A.M., an interview was conducted with the CDM. The CDM was asked who was responsible to ensure resident food preferences were followed. The CDM stated the diet aide was responsible to call out the diet order and check the accuracy of the meal tray according to the meal ticket. The CDM also stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to ensure one Unlicensed Staff (Unlicensed Staff B) wore an N95 respirator to care for COVID-19 positive residents. This failure can result to the spread of infection to other facility residents and staff and cause an outbreak of COVID-19 in the facility further endangering the lives of the already frail elderly residents of the facility. Findings: During an observation on 7/24/24, at 1:07 PM, this Surveyor knocked on the door of room [ROOM NUMBER] where Resident 6 and Resident 7 were roomed-in. Unlicensed Staff B opened the door and was observed wearing a gown, gloves, and a surgical mask pulled low on her face exposing her nose. During an interview on 7/24/24, at 2:33 PM, Licensed Staff C confirmed she also noted Unlicensed Staff B was wearing a surgical mask with her nose showing over the top of the mask. During an interview on 7/24/24, at 2:38 PM the Infection Preventionist (IP) confirmed Resident 6 and Resident 7 in room [ROOM NUMBER]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure call lights (an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a patient when in need) was accessible to four of four sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3 & 4). This failure kept the residents' needs uncommunicated to the staff, potentially placing them at risk for neglect and harm. Findings: Resident 1 During a review of the Face sheet (A one-page summary of important information about a resident) indicated Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: Flaccid (soft and limp) Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body); Anxiety Disorder (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (when a person has trouble remembering, learning new things, concentrating, or making decisions that affect their everyday life). During a review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool completed by clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to revise and implement a Fall and Elopement Care Plan for four of five sampled residents (Resident 1, 3, 4 and 5). These failure had the potential for facility staff to provide inadequate care and supervision to ensure the health and safety needs of the Residents were met. (Reference F600 & F689) Findings: Resident 1 During an observation in Resident 1 ' s room on 1/18/24 at 11:36 a.m., Resident 1 was in bed with her head of bed elevated at approximately 45°, awake. Her white push button call light was hanging and wrapped on the right side bedrail. When Resident 1 was asked if she could reach her call light, she stated she did not know where her call light was. During a review of the Fall Care Plan for Resident 1 and concurrent interview with Licensed Staff H on 2/01/24 at 11:30 a.m., indicated, [Resident 1] is moderate risk for falls related to deconditioning (the decline in physical function of the body as a result of physical inactivity), and gait (walking)/ balance problems. One of the Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to update the Elopement (an unauthorized departure of a patient from an around-the-clock care setting) Risk Observation/ Assessment and failed to provide oversight supervision to ensure a safe environment to one of two sampled residents (Resident 5), when facility staff were aware of Resident 5 ' s attempt of leaving the facility unsupervised. These failures resulted to Resident 5 leaving the facility repeatedly without staff supervision, putting her at risk for serious physical harm or even death. Findings: During a review of the Face sheet indicated Resident 5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: [NAME] encephalopathy (a degenerative (deterioration) brain disorder); Anxiety Disorder; and Bipolar Disorder (disorder associated with episodes of mood swings). During a review of the facility document titled, Nursing - Elopement Risk Observation/ Assessment, dated 9/06/23, indicated Resident 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure its transfer or discharge policy was implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was discharged from the facility while being treated at the hospital and the Long-term Care Ombudsman (a person who investigates, reports on, and helps settle complaints) was not notified of the discharge. This failure prevented Resident 1 to exercise his right to appeal the facility's decision to be discharged and prevented the Ombudsman from advocating for Resident 1's best interest during the discharge process. Findings: During a review of the Face sheet (A one-page summary of important information about a resident) indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to Malignant Neoplasm (another term for a cancerous tumor [cancer cells form a lump or growth] of Rectum (end part of the large intestine that connects the colon to the anus); Colostomy Status (an operation that creates an opening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure notices of the bed hold policy were provided to two of three hospitalized residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 2 not being informed they could return to the facility after hospitalization, and if they needed to submit payment to reserve a bed. Resident 1 During a review of the Face sheet (A one-page summary of important information about a resident) indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including but not limited to Malignant Neoplasm (another term for a cancerous tumor [cancer cells form a lump or growth] of Rectum (end part of the large intestine that connects the colon to the anus); Colostomy Status (an operation that creates an opening for the colon, or large intestine, through the abdomen); and Artificial Opening of the Urinary Tract (also known as Urostomy [a surgical procedure to create a stoma (artificial opening) so urine can pass out of the body through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to allow one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) to return to the nursing facility, when Resident 1 was ready to be discharged from the hospital and wanted to return to the nursing facility. This failure had the potential to cause psychosocial (pertaining to the influence of social factors on an individual's mind or behavior) harm for Resident 1 from displacement (the act of forcing somebody/something away from their home or position). Findings: During a review of the Face sheet (A one-page summary of important information about a resident) indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to Malignant Neoplasm (another term for a cancerous tumor [cancer cells form a lump or growth] of Rectum (end part of the large intestine that connects the colon to the anus); Colostomy Status (an operation that creates an opening for the colon, or large intestine, through the abdomen); and Artificial Opening of the Urinary Tract…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report to the State (the centralized, law-making, law-enforcing, politically [NAME] institution in society) and the Ombudsman (a person who investigates, reports on, and helps settle complaints) an allegation of abuse for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 1 threatened to kill Resident 2. These failures could potentially put the facility residents ' safety at risk and could result to ongoing abuse. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s face sheet (demographics) indicated she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] Her diagnoses included Essential Hypertension (occurs when you have abnormally high blood pressure that's not the result of a medical condition), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high) and Hyperlipidemia ((high cholesterol, is an excess of lipids or fats in your blood). Her Minimum Data Sheet Assessment (MDS, a federally mandated process…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to ensure effective kitchen oversight by the Registered Dietitian (RD) and designated Dietary Manager as evidenced by findings associated with meal production and meal distribution, food safety and sanitation, safe/functional environment, and staff orientation and training. This failure had the potential for putting 64 of 66 residents at nutritional risk or further compromising their nutritional status. Findings: During review of dietetic service operations during an annual recertification survey from 8/8/22 to 8/12/22, multiple deficient dietetic practices were noted. The RD and Dietary Manager did not: 1. ensure dietary staff followed the approved menu and physician diet orders to prepare food to conserve flavor and palatability and serve the correct amount of food when five (5) residents on small portion diets and an unidentified resident on double portion diet were served regular portion meals; and seven (7) residents on pureed diet were served salty pureed chicken. (Cross Reference F803 and F804); 2. ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the approved menu and physician diet orders when one Confidential Resident and Resident 52 complained of meal portions, five (5) of 64 residents (Resident 50, Resident 34, Resident 28, Resident 41, and Resident 51) on small portion diet, and one (1) unidentified resident on double entree diet were served the same portion of food like all the other residents who were on regular portion diet. This failure could result in undesirable changes of nutritional status, impaired healing, or poor well-being of residents in the facility. Findings: During the resident council meeting on 8/9/22, at 10 AM, Confidentail Resident stated there was issue with portion control. She was supposed to receive 1/2 cup rice, but one time staff used an ice scream scoop and the rice she received was only 1/4 instead of 1/2 cup rice. During interview on 8/9/22, at 3:22 PM, Resident 52 stated food portions were different sizes, most often too small. Resident 52's diet order was regular minced and moist texture regular consistency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare food to conserve flavor and palatability (tastiness) for 4 unsampled residents (Resident 14, Resident 52, and two confidential residents) and 7 of 64 resident (Resident 53, Resident 45, Resident 48, Resident 18, Resident 16, Resident 160, and Resident 43) who were on pureed diet, when pureed entrée was served salty to taste. This failure could lead to weight loss and decline in nutritional status of residents in the facility. Findings: During an interview on 08/08/22, at 12:21 PM, Resident 14 stated he does not like the food in the facility. During the resident council meeting on 8/9/22, at 10 AM, two confidential residents stated food was not good. During an interview on 8/9/11, at 3:22 PM, Resident 52 stated food was served cold, portions were different sizes, most often too small, and had a bland taste. During a concurrent observation and interview in the kitchen on 8/10/22, at 9:39 AM, Unlicensed Staff I was pureeing chicken patties in preparation for lunch. When asked how he prepared the pureed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff practiced safe food handling to prevent potential food contamination when an opened bag of all purpose flour was not transferred to a clean container with a lid after it was opened. These failure could potentially result to food contamination and outbreak of foodborne illness among residents of the facility. Findings: During an initial tour of the kitchen and concurrent interview on 8/8/22, at 10:04 AM, an all purpose flour was found in its opened original paper bag in the dry goods section. When asked about the flour, Unlicensed Staff I stated the flour was delivered over the weekend, opened the previous night and was not tranfered to a container with a lid. During a follow-up visit of the kitchen and concurrent interview on 8/10/22, at 10:18 AM, the all-purpose flour was observed in the same place in its original opened paper bag. When asked why it was not transferred in a clean container with a lid, Unlicensed Staff I stated he had informed and requested the other cook to store it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement measures to reduce the risk of disease and infection transmission when: 1. Licensed staff were unable to identify appropriate transmission based precautions in caring for two out of two sampled resident (Resident 53 and 46) who had ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase, an enzyme found in strains of bacteria and is spread by direct contact with the infected persons' bodily fluids); and 2. Facility leadership A) Did not provide a clean and sanitary environment or implement infection prevention surveillance during an ongoing construction project within the building (dating back to approximately 11/2021) to ensure infection prevention standards were maintained, B) Did not verify construction workers, working inside the building, were fully vaccinated and tested for Covid prior to entering the facility, per facility policy; and C) Did not ensure the Infection Control Committee (IC; designated team that functions to prevent and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-12 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on the resident's reported missing personal items and ensure the residents aware of the Theft and Loss policy for three (Resident 37, 211 and 35) out of six sampled resident's personal belongings from theft/loss. These failures resulted in residents stating they felt frustration, grief and confusion regarding the facility's lack of care and respect to their personal items. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 37's, admission Record, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of elevated blood pressure and major depressive disorder. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:17 p.m., with Resident 37, Resident 37 stated, there was a lot of stuff in this room (Resident 37's bedroom), but she did not know what was missing and what was not missing. Resident 37 stated she had been collecting coloring pages for the past six years and had collected a stack of loose coloring pages approximately six inches…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-12 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the required notice and communication posting with the State Survey Agency (SSA) can be read and understood by the residents without staff assistance for three confidential residents and three out three sampled residents (Residents 1, 14 and 56). This failure had resulted to residents not having an access to this contact Information should they need to file a complaint with the State Survey Agency and had the risk for residents to feel like their welfare and autonomy does not matter. Findings: During the Resident Council meeting on 8/9/12 at 10:00 a.m., Three confidential residents stated State Survey Agency information was not posted in the building and they had no way of reaching out to the state if they have a concern. Two of these three residents stated this was very frustrating. One of these three residents stated it would be great if the facility can post the State Survey Agency contact information in the building. During an observation on 8/9/22 at 11:20 a.m., the walk through inside the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the residents were aware on how to formally file a grievance for three out of 12 sampled residents (Residents 24, 35 and 211). This failure had the potential to result in residents unresolved grievance, leaving residents feeling angry and frustrated. Findings: During an interview on 8/8/12 at 10 a.m., Residents 24 and 35 stated the facility did not have a grievance process, or if they have, that they do not know how to file a formal grievance. Resident 24 stated there was usually no follow up on their grievance or complaints, so they do not know whether the grievance or complaint was looked into or if the grievance was resolved. During an interview on 8/10/22 at 10:42 a.m., Social Services Director (SSD) stated she was the grievance officer. SSD stated it was up to the residents if they would prefer to file a formal grievance or just report it to a manager. SSD stated there were no in services provided to staff regarding the grievance process. SSD stated she was the one who fills out the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility: 1) Failed to protect one resident (Resident 41) from verbal abuse when she was subjected to sexual and inappropriate comments by 2 male residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) and 2) Failed to protect one resident (Resident 21) from profane comments from Resident 1. These failures caused Resident 41 to feel uncomfortable and creepy, contributed to Resident 21 appearing upset, and caused potential for emotional distress and suffering, which in turn could cause decreased ability for Resident 41 and Resident 21 to attain or maintain their highest practicable psychosocial well-being. Findings 1) Review of Resident 1's medical record revealed he was a male resident with a BIMS (assessment tool) score of 8 (moderate cognitive impairment). Review of a nursing care plan (document that contains relevant patient information, goals of treatment, and specific nursing interventions needed to provide resident-specific care) for Resident 1 (revised on 5/3/2022) indicated, (Resident 1) has episodes of swearing at staff, calls staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to timely report three allegations of abuse involving Residents 1, Resident 2, Resident 41, and Resident 21 to the State Survey Agency. These failures prevented the State Survey Agency from conducting independent abuse investigations on behalf of Resident 41 and Resident 21 and potentially negatively impacted the psychosocial well-being of all four residents. These failures also had the potential to result in re-occurrence abuse. Findings 1) Review of Resident 1's medical record revealed he was a male resident with a BIMS (assessment tool) score of 8 (moderate cognitive impairment). Review of a nursing care plan (document that contains relevant patient information, goals of treatment, and specific nursing interventions needed to provide resident-specific care) for Resident 1 (revised on 5/3/2022) indicated, (Resident 1) has episodes of swearing at staff, calls staff names, throws things, makes inappropriate comments to and about staff. An additional nursing care plan, created on 3/16/2022, indicated, (Resident 1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate three allegations of abuse involving Residents 1, Resident 2, Resident 41, and Resident 21. These failures prevented the facility from determining the root cause of the incidents and from assessing the victims for potential negative outcomes; these failures potentially prevented the facility from protecting the victims from further abuse and potentially negatively impacted the psychosocial well-being of all four involved residents. Findings 1) Review of Resident 1's medical record revealed he was a male resident with a BIMS (assessment tool) score of 8 (moderate cognitive impairment). Review of a nursing care plan (document that contains relevant patient information, goals of treatment, and specific nursing interventions needed to provide resident-specific care) for Resident 1 (revised on 5/3/2022) indicated, (Resident 1) has episodes of swearing at staff, calls staff names, throws things, makes inappropriate comments to and about staff. An additional nursing care plan, created on 3/16/2022,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility 1) Failed to implement the interventions to reduce the fall risk and hazards for one out of one sampled resident (Resident 12), which had the potential to result in serious injuries, including fractures and broken bones; and 2) Failed to adequately supervise one resident (Resident 1), who had a history of aggression, when he pulled 2 televisions off the walls in his room and the incident was not documented. This caused potential harm to Resident 1 and Resident 49 (Resident 1's roommate) when the televisions were pulled from the wall and caused potential for inability to track Resident 1's behaviors when the incident was not documented in his, or Resident 49's, medical records. Findings: 1) Resident 12's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was [AGE] years old with a diagnosis of Osteoarthritis (OA- degenerative joint disease or wear and tear arthritis. The cartilage within a joint begins to break down and the underlying bone begins to change)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the respiratory care equipment was labeled with due dates for changing the tubing and humidifiers for 2 of 8 residents (Resident 161 and 162). This failure could lead to oxygen tubing and humidifiers not being changed. Residents were then placed at risk for infection if the tubing is contaminated or the humidifier water gets contaminated. Findings: Record review of Resident 161's admission record documented Resident 161 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for orthopedic aftercare related to a closed fracture at the neck base of the left femur (fractured hip.) Other diagnosis included Asthma, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heartbeat,) Hypertension (high blood pressure) and Major Depressive Disorder. Resident 161's physician orders dated 7/27/22 indicated she was to be on oxygen therapy per nasal prongs at 2 liters continuously. Resident 161's Nursing Care Plan documented resident has oxygen therapy for asthma and indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to maintain accurate medical records on two (Resident 1 and Resident 6) out of two sampled residents when: 1) Resident 1 had two outbursts of pulling television sets out of their wall mounted brackets and there was no documentation in the medical record regarding the event and 2) Resident 6 had nursing documentation indicating her toenails were short and clean when observed the toenails on both feet had been overgrown and full of dry flaky skin. These failures resulted in inaccurate medical records which either did not include important changes in condition or inaccurate nursing assessments which could potentially endanger each resident Findings: 1) Review of Resident 1's medical record revealed he was a male resident with a BIMS (assessment tool) score of 8 (moderate cognitive impairment). Review of a nursing care plan (document that contains relevant patient information, goals of treatment, and specific nursing interventions needed to provide resident-specific care) for Resident 1 (revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 8 residents on hall 2 (Resident 161) who did not get a shower or have hair washed for 10 days. This failure had the potential to lower a resident's self-esteem and leave resident at risk for infection. Findings: Record review of Resident 161's admission record documented Resident 161 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for orthopedic aftercare related to a closed fracture at the neck base of the left femur (fractured hip.) Other diagnosis included Asthma, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heartbeat,) Hypertension (high blood pressure) and Major Depressive Disorder. During an observation and resident interview on 8/8/22 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 161 was lying in bed wearing a hospital gown, and her hair was oily with stands of hair clumping together. Resident 161 was asked if staff was getting her up and/or to activities. Resident 161 stated I have not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow Physician orders to prevent and treat constipation for 1 of 8 Residents on hall 2 (Resident 18). This failure resulted in Resident 18 having a bout of constipation, which caused Resident 18 moderate pain and discomfort and put her at risk for tearing of the mucous membrane and forming hemorrhoids from being constipated. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's admission revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] as a Hospice patient with diagnosis of malignant neoplasm (cancer) of kidney, vascular dementia, adult failure to thrive, with a history of seizure disorder and a history of falling. During a review of Resident 18's Medication Administration Record (MAR,) the MAR indicated medication orders to prevent constipation. Resident 18 was on Senekot, a mild laxative, with 2 tablets to be given by mouth twice a day. Resident 18 was also ordered milk of magnesia (MOM), a stronger laxative to be given once every 24 hours for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary foot care treatment for one (Resident 6) of one sampled resident when the facility did not have a process for ensuring residents had appropriate foot care. This failure resulted in Resident 6 having significantly overgrown toenails. Findings: A review of Resident 6's admission Record, dated 9/17/21, indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures), mild asthma (a condition in which a persons' airways become inflamed, narrow and swell and produce extra mucous which makes it difficult to breathe) and muscle weakness. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/8/22 at 9:16 a.m., with Unlicensed Staff L, Unlicensed Staff L stated when Resident 6 was given a bed bath, if a resident's toenails were long and needed to be trimmed, the nurse would be informed. Unlicensed Staff L was observed to pull…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one out of one sampled resident (Resident 49) who requires dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) received care consistent with professional standards of practice when there was no assessment of the Resident 49's left arm for bruit (a rumbling or swooshing sound of a dialysis fistula usually heard with a stethoscope) or thrill (a vibration felt on the overlying skin ) every four hours after dialysis treatments as stated on the facility's Nurses Dialysis Communication Record form. This failure could result to nurses missing the changes in the fistula bruit/thrill that could signal a serious issue with Resident 49's dialysis fistula such as stenosis, failure to dialyze, Aneurysm (a swollen area which develops as a result of the vessel becoming weakened) and Steal syndrome (result of the fistula depriving the area below it of blood). Findings:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment in the kitchen as evidence by cracked and broken linoleum/tiles on the kitchen floor. This failure could cause trips and falls among the kitchen staff and cause dirt to build up on the floor attracting cockroaches and rodents. Findings: During a visit to the kitchen and subsequent interview on 8/10/22, at 10:22 AM, two spots of cracked and broken flooring at the front of one of the stove/oven were noted. RD K stated the break in the flooring was already discussed and a job order for repair was in the process. A copy of the job order was then requested of RD K. During a follow-up interview and review of records on 8/10/22, at 10:31 AM RD K provided a print-out of the work order dated 8/10/22 at 10:26 AM. RD K stated she proceeded with the job order request as it was not done as she expected. Review of the Food Code 2017 indicated: It is the standard of practice to ensure materials for indoor floor, wall, and ceiling surfaces under conditions of normal use shall be:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wishes for code status were accurately documented for one (Resident (R) 227) of seven sampled residents whose clinical records were reviewed for advanced directives. The failure to allow a resident to formulate advanced directives that were clearly documented to facility staff had the potential to affect the seventy-six residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: According to the Face Sheet, R227 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Medical Diagnoses section of the electronic health record (EHR) documented diagnoses that included chronic lymphocytic leukemia of B-cell type and chronic pain syndrome. The significant change of status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of [DATE], indicated R227 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 05, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. This MDS identified R227 had a California Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-07-12 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure three resident rooms (10, 23, and 31) out of 34 rooms had the required 80 square feet per resident. Findings include: A tour of the facility was conducted with the Area Maintenance Director (AMD) on 07/12/19 at 11:30 AM. Four resident rooms were selected to be measured during this tour. On 07/12/19 at 11:30 AM, it was identified that two residents resided in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The AMD took the measurements of the room and stated it measured 13 feet wide by 12 feet in length, which equaled 156 square feet. This was noted as less than 80 square feet per resident. At 11:33 AM, it was identified that two residents resided in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The AMD took the measurements of the room and stated it measured 12 feet wide by 13 feet in length, which equaled 156 square feet. This was noted as less than 80 square feet per resident. At 11:34 AM, it was identified that two residents resided in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The AMD took measurements of the room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$32,280 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $16,244 — penalty dated 2025-04-16
  • $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-08-13
  • $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-08-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5San Diego Post-Acute CenterEl Cajon, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PROVIDENCE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/11/2023
PICETTI, DOMINICIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/01/2024
TUCKER, RILEYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2023
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$592K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 3%Medicare 15%Other / private 82%

This home reported $592K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$444per resident / day
operating cost
$13,485per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$500per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555703. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next