Great Plains Post Acute
7101 E 21st Street North, Wichita, KS 67206 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 118 certified beds · (316) 867-6101 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0568)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $46,331 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-11)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (79%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.2% | 17.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.7% | 4.9% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.6% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.5% | 23.2% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 59.6% | 95.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 4.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.5% | 22.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.5% | 18.1% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 47.8% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.5% | 22.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.6% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.51 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.53 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.2%CMS range 29.5–53.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 6.6–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.9%CMS range 3.3–10.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 105.0 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 79% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
62 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-05 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 100 residents with eight residents sampled and one resident reviewed for proper discharge from facility. The facility failed to readmit Resident (R) 77 back into the facility. The likelihood for a serious adverse outcome existed, due to the threat to R77's continuity of care, feelings of insecurity to his safety in not having a place to discharge to after the facility had been providing his care for the past two years and four months. The negative psychosocial impact is significant and traumatic, with R77s history of having to live in a men's shelter. This placed R77 in immediate jeopardy. Findings Included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR), documented R77 had diagnoses of autistic disorder (is a neurological and developmental disorder that affects how people interact with others, communicate, learn, and behave), anxiety, and schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition that is marked by a mix of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-05 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolatedHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 100 residents with eight residents sampled and one resident reviewed for fecal impaction (accumulation of hardened feces in the rectum that the individual was unable to move), and constipation (difficulty passing stools). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have an adequate system in place to identify the known signs and symptoms of fecal impaction for Resident (R) 77, who was required to have a large stool ball removed from his upper rectum, under anesthesia on 02/25/25 at 10:30 AM at the local hospital. This deficient practice placed all residents at risk in immediate jeopardy. Findings Included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R77 had a diagnosis of constipation. The 12/11/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one, which indicated severely impaired cognition. R77 required total assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL) eating, dressing, mobility, transfers, bathing, oral care, and toileting. R77 was always…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 107 residents with one resident reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment on 12/10/23 when a facility staff member gave their personal vaping pen (an electronic device shaped like a pen that is used to inhale vapor when vaping), (which allegedly contained tetrahydro cannabinol [THC], an illegal psychoactive substance) to cognitively intact Resident (R) 1, who had a known history of substance abuse. R1 used the staff members vape pen (a device using marijuana that vaporize the active molecules in concentrated marijuana oil) and was found by staffR1 unable to function and required transfer to the emergency room for evaluation. This deficient practice placed R1 in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - Review of the 08/05/21 Physicians Orders revealed R1 had diagnoses of alcohol abuse (a spectrum of unhealthy drinking behavior) and psychoactive substance abuse (substance that when taking in or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 102 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident (R) 157 when a tourniquet was left on his arm from a blood draw on a Friday and not found until Monday, a total of 5 days. Findings included: - R157's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed a diagnoses transient ischemic attack (TIA- temporary episode of inadequate blood supply to the brain), sepsis (life threatening systemic reaction that develops due to infections which cause inflammation throughout the entire body), and lactic acidosis (excessive accumulation of lactic acid produced by the muscle cells with the breakdown of carbohydrates for energy). The Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented an order dated 01/10/25 for hyponatremia (less than normal concentration of sodium in the blood), hyperkalemia (greater than normal amount of potassium in the blood), and transaminitis (a liver enzyme in the blood) lab tests to be obtained. The Progress Notes documented the following: On 01/09/25 at 12:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 102 residents with 21 sampled, which included one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to prevent the development of facility-acquired, stage 3 pressure ulcers/injuries (full thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) for Resident (R)14. Findings include: - Review of R14's diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented: anorexia (lack or loss of appetite), metabolic encephalopathy (condition in which brain function is disturbed either temporarily or permanently due to different diseases or toxins in the body), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The 11/27/24 Quarterly MDS documented a BIMS score of two, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 102 residents with 21 sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff assessed Resident (R) 409 after a fall on 01/27/25 and failed to document the fall and/or the resident's status after the fall until the resident transferred to a local hospital and was diagnosed with multiple fractures (broken bones). Findings included: - R409's Physician's Orders dated 01/09/25 revealed the resident had a diagnosis of unspecified fracture of the left femur (broken bone). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating moderately impaired cognition. The resident had no behaviors exhibited, required a wheelchair for mobility and required substantial/maximal assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL). The Care Area Assessment[s] dated 01/15/25 for Cognitive Loss/Dementia and Falls revealed R409 admitted from hospital after falling at home and sustaining a left femur…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-02-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 102 residents, with 21 sampled, and one resident reviewed for weight loss. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor the weight loss and failed to develop care plan interventions to address the weight loss for cognitively impaired Resident (R) 14, who had an identified weight loss of 20.54% in one month. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the resident's physical well-being. Findings include: - Review of R14's diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented, anorexia (lack or loss of appetite), metabolic encephalopathy (condition in which brain function is disturbed either temporarily or permanently due to different diseases or toxins in the body), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The 11/27/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a BIMS score of two, which indicated severely impaired cognition. R14 required set up for eating and no weight loss noted. The 01/26/25 Significant Change (MDS) documented a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 95, who was at risk for pressure ulcers (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction), received the proper care and treatments to avoid the worsening of a deep tissue injury (DTI - a purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin or blood?filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from pressure and/or shear) and the new development of a stage three (full-thickness) pressure injury/ulcer to her sacral/coccyx (small triangular bone at the base of the spine) area. This deficient practice also placed R95 at risk for further skin breakdown and complications from wound infection. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R95 documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN-an elevated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-06-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to recognize, evaluate, manage, and treat Resident (R) 305's pain. This deficient practice resulted in uncontrolled pain which also placed the resident at risk for impaired mobility and diminished quality of life. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R305 had diagnoses of end stage renal disease (inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes, concentrate urine and conserve electrolytes), dependence on renal dialysis (procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly), chronic pain syndrome, acute pain due to trauma, muscle weakness, fracture (broken bone) of second lumbar (lower back) vertebra (small bones forming the backbone), and altered mental status. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 06/21/23, documented R305 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from physical restraint when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M placed her hand over Resident (R) 1's mouth to keep her quiet. Findings include:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of a wedge compression fracture of the second and third lumbar vertebra (spine bones). R1's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition; R1 was dependent upon staff for activities of daily living (ADL) including toileting, showers and mobility with a wheelchair. R1's Quarterly MDS, dated 04/21/2026, revealed a BIMS score of 13 indicating intact cognition. The MDS recorded no other changes from the previous MDS. R1's Care Plan, revised on 04/21/2026, indicated R1 had a behavior of yelling out, crying out, impatient, demanding, manipulative with staff and her family. R1 had limited physical mobility related to weakness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-22 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the services of a full-time certified dietary manager for the residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. Findings included:- On 04/20/26 at 08:35 AM, observation revealed that dietary staff in the kitchen prepared the breakfast meal. On 4/20/26 at 09:00 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified the dietary manager was not certified. Staff BB stated the facility had two residents with a pureed diet and eight who required a mechanical soft diet. On 04/20/26 at 03:30 PM, Administrative Staff A verified Dietary Staff BB was not certified. Upon request, the facility failed to provide a Certified Dietary manager policy
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prepare, store, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions for the 106 residents in the facility, who receive their meals from the kitchen. Findings included:- On 04/20/26 at 08:20 AM, during initial kitchen tour, observation revealed the following: One 12 inch by 12 inch air vent grill located above the tri compartment sink area was covered with a brownish greasy/sticky substance and gray fuzzy substance on all four edges of the vent, blowing directly on the cleaning area. Two 24 inch by 24 inch return air vent grill located above the cooking stove area covered had brownish grease/sticky substance and gray fuzzy substance blowing directly on the food preparation and stove cooking area. There was brownish splatter behind the cooking stove on the wall approximately four feet from the baseboard. The baseboard was covered with a brownish greasy substance along the floor area. One 36 inch by 36 inch ceiling mounted air conditioner had a brownish gray fuzzy substance that covered the metal grill. The wall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to resolve recurring issues reported by the Resident Council. Findings included: - A review of the facility's Resident Council Minutes, from 01/2025 to 03/2026, indicated recurring concerns related to call light response times. The Resident Council Minutes for January 2025, in which 18 residents attended, indicated concerns related to call lights not being answered in a timely manner, and documented the issue would be addressed by nursing administration. The Resident Council Minutes for February 2025, in which 18 residents attended, indicated concerns related to call lights not being answered in a timely manner, and documented the issue would be addressed by nursing administration. The Resident Council Minutes for March 2025, in which 17 residents attended, indicated concerns related to call lights not being answered in a timely manner and documented the issue would be addressed by nursing administration. The Resident Council Minutes for June 2025, in which 17 residents attended, indicated concerns related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement alternative communication methods for one resident. Resident (R) 22, who spoke in Bengali.Finding included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R22 documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), pain, and anxiety (a mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R93 had severely impaired cognition. R93 was dependent upon staff assistance for toileting, showers, dressing, and personal hygiene. R93 required substantial staff assistance for mobility and transfers. R93 made herself understood and had unclear speech.R93's 03/23/26 Care Plan included the following interventions:06/14/24- R93 required a translator to communicate and ensure the availability and functioning of adaptive communication equipment. Provide a translator as necessary to communicate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing services as care planned for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 107. Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R107 documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear, diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and obesity (excessive body fat).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R107 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. R107 was dependent upon staff assistance for toileting hygiene, dressing, mobility, and transfers. The MDS documented R107 did not receive showers during the assessment period.The Annual MDS, dated 04/01/26, documented R107 had a BIMS score of 13, indicating intact cognition. R107 was dependent upon staff assistance for lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to evaluate the effectiveness of fall interventions for two residents, Resident (R) 29 and R93, who had multiple falls, to prevent further falls. Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R29 documented diagnoses of cerebellar ataxia (impaired ability to coordinate movement), autistic disorder (a developmental disability caused by differences in the brain), weakness, restlessness, and agitation (feeling of aggravation or restlessness brought on by a provocation or a medical condition).The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R29 had severely impaired cognition. R29 was dependent upon staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs). R29 had no upper or lower functional impairment and had two or more non-injury falls.The Quarterly MDS, dated 04/01/26, documented R29 had severely impaired cognition. R29 was dependent upon staff assistance for all adl's. R29 had no upper or lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify trauma-based triggers related to Resident (R)41 and R13 post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress) and failed to implement individualized interventions to prevent re-traumatization. Findings included:- R41's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of PTSD, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R41's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident was dependent on activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS further documented R41 had no physical behaviors. R41's Care Plan, dated 01/13/26, documented R41 had behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label Resident (R) 46 and R89s' insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) flex pens with an opened date and the facility failed to label the tuberculin vial solution with an opened date. Findings included:- On [DATE] at 09:30 AM, observation of the facility's East Hall nurse medication cart revealed the following: R46's Lantus (long-acting insulin) two flex pen was labeled with a date opened, but it was smeared and not able to be read. R89's Novolog (fast-acting insulin) flex pen was not labeled with a date opened or discard date. On [DATE] at 11:00 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the nurses should label and date the insulin flex pens with the date opened and the expiration date and discard the expired insulin pens. Medlineplus.gov directs open, unrefrigerated Lantus and Humalog can be used within 28 days; after that time, they must be discarded. The facility's Storage of Medication policy, dated 11/20,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a communication process between the hospice provider and the facility for Resident (R)81, which included a plan of care and a description of the services provided, which included contact information, visit frequency, medications, and medical equipment. Findings included:- R81's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). R81's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R81 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognitive impairment. The MDS document R81 required partial to moderate staff assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS documented that R81 received hospice care services. R81's Care Plan, revised 02/17/26, documented R81 had limited physical mobility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff failed to wear appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms, which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) for one resident, Resident (R) 107. Findings included:- On 04/21/26 at 07:45 AM, R107's room had EBP signage at the room entrance. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and CNA O gowned but did not put on a gown. The CNAs removed R107's incontinence brief, and CNA M started to perform personal care to R107. R107 asked them if she needed to hold up her belly for them to wipe. CNA M stated, Yes, and after she held up her belly, CNA M wiped, and R107 said it hurt. R107 had a small open area under her belly. Licensed Nurse (LN) H was informed of the opening and came in, without a gown, and applied a cream to the area and stated she would get an order for treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment in the laundry room. Findings included:- On 04/22/26 at 09:49 AM, observation in the laundry room revealed the following:1. Missing floor tile along the front of the two front loader washing machines and behind the washers, approximately five feet (ft) by eight inches (in). 2. Behind the washing machines were two floor grates, approximately two ft by 18 in with grayish-black fuzzy substance on the top of them.3. The right front loader washing machine had numerous different-sized streaks of dried white substance below the door and on the right side.4. Underneath the sink, located in the clean area, had missing tile approximately two ft by 18 in. On 04/22/27 at 09:49 AM, Laundry Supervisor (LS) U verified the above findings and stated maintenance was responsible for cleaning the area, and the tile was supposed to be replaced a year ago. On 04/22/26 at 11:17 AM, Maintenance Supervisor (MS) V verified the above findings and stated he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 105 residents with four residents included in the sample. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the staff administration of resident's medication met professional standards. The Certified Medication Aide administered Trazodone to Resident (R)2 at the incorrect time, and left R3's medication in her room, without observing the resident consume the medication and staff later found 15 medication cups with one gabapentin (medication used for nerve pain) and one tramadol (medication used for moderate to severe pain) in each cup and also found 19 tramadol pills in R3's drawer. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 05/29/24 indicated the following diagnoses: acute/chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (persisting for a long period, often for the remainder of a person's lifetime, chronically poor airflow) and type two diabetes (a disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulins is impaired,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-11 · tag F0568 — widespreadProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 102 residents, which included 57 residents with active trusts held by the facility. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements for the 57 residents with trust accounts in the facility. Findings included: - Review of Trust Transaction History of all 57 residents who had active trusts held by the facility revealed no quarterly statements available for review. During an interview on 02/11/25 at 10:19 AM Administrative Staff PP revealed the facility maintained trust funds for 57 residents in the facility. Administrative Staff PP revealed quarterly statements were printed out and hand delivered to residents that had high cognitive functioning or mailed to the residents' representatives if the resident had low cognitive functioning. The facility was unable to provide documentation, which indicated quarterly statements were given to the 57 residents of the facility. The facility did not provide a policy related to management of trust funds. The facility failed to provide quarterly statements…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 102 with 21 residents in the sample. Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure competent nursing staff when the LN did not apply a pressure dressing to R5's ruptured and heavily bleeding hematoma (collection of blood trapped in the tissues of the skin or in an organ, resulting from trauma) on the resident's right lower leg. The facility failed to maintain the quality of care for R409 which included lack of assessment, documentation from a fall on 01/27/25 which caused a fracture (broken bone) of the pelvic area. Findings included: - The Physician's Orders dated 02/03/25 revealed R5 had a diagnosis of hemiplegia (muscle weakness of one half of the body) and hemiparesis (paralysis of one side of the body) following a cerebral infraction (stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-11 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 102 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct annual performance reviews for five of the five direct care staff reviewed, to ensure the residents receive adequate cares. Findings included: - Review of employment files for five sampled certified medication aides/certified nurse aides (CMA/CNA) employed at the facility for one year or more revealed all five lacked an annual performance review for: 1. CNA VV 2. CNA WW 3. CMA XX 4. CMA YY 5. CNA ZZ On 02/10/25 at 11:13 AM Administrative Staff A confirmed the five direct care/CMA/CNA reviewed lacked annual performance evaluations. She stated that the direct care staff employed over one year should have an annual performance review which included identified weaknesses and action plan to improve their performance. The nursing staff work throughout the facility with all the residents. The facility failed to provide a policy to address completion of a required performance review to identify direct care staff weaknesses and an action plan to improve staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 102 residents with 21 residents sampled for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from the resident's bedside, toilet, and bathing facilities. Findings included: - Tour on 02/03/25 at 02:30 PM, of the facility revealed call lights from any resident room or bathing facility area in the facility had only a light above the door that activated upon the call light being activated. When the call light was activated, the only indicator was the light above the door in the hallway that had no audible indicator nor to a console anywhere else in the facility. Review of the November 2024 through February 2025 resident council minutes, including grievances, documented the council reported the following: On 11/08/24 residents reported that call lights were not answered timely, with no response noted. On 12/13/24 residents reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-11 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 102 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides included annual mandatory training for abuse, neglect, and exploitation training. Findings included: - Review of employment files for five sampled certified medication aides/certified nurse aides (CMA/CNA) employed at the facility for one year or more revealed all five lacked continuing education, training provided for Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (ANE) for: 1. CNA VV 2. CNA WW 3. CMA XX 4. CMA YY 5. CNA ZZ On 02/10/25 at 11:13 AM, Administrative Staff A, confirmed the . above findings. She stated the facility should ensure the staff employed over one year should continuing education which include the mandatory Inservice training to for Abuse Neglect and exploitation (ANE). Additionally, she reported she could not guarantee the above noted staff had received mandatory in-services for ANE. The facility policy Abuse Prevention Program, dated 04/2021, documentation include the facility should provide staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 102 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides but must be no less than 12 hours per year and Include dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training and address areas of weakness as determined in nurse aides' performance reviews which address the special needs of residents as determined by the facility staff. Findings included: - Review of employment files for five sampled certified medication aides/certified nurse aides (CMA/CNA) employed at the facility for one year or more revealed all five lacked 12 hours of continuing education, training provided based on identified weaknesses, or evidence of mandatory training which included Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation for: 1. CNA VV 2. CNA WW 3. CMA XX 4. CMA YY 5. CNA ZZ On 02/10/25 at 11:13 AM, Administrative Staff A, confirmed the . above findings. She stated the facility should ensure the staff employed over one year should have a minimum of 12 hours of continuing education which include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-11 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 102 residents. The sample included 21 residents with seven residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to seven residents, Resident (R) 14, R75, R79, R88, R92, R96, and R409 and/or their representative with a written notice specifying the duration of the bed-hold policy, at the time of the residents' transfers to the hospital. Findings include: - Review of R14's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the lack of a completed bed hold form, or a progress note of a bed hold obtained, when R14 admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and 01/11/25. Review of R75's EHR revealed the lack of a completed bed hold form, or a progress note of a bed hold obtained, when R75 admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of R79's EHR revealed the lack of a completed bed hold form, or a progress note of a bed hold obtained, when R79 admitted to the hospital on [DATE], and 11/12/24. Review of R88's EHR revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - Review of the Resident (R)82's, Physician Orders, dated 05/18/22, revealed diagnoses which included anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, reduced mobility, obesity (severe overweight), and need for assistance with personal care. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documentation included her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact. She reported it was very important to choose what clothes to wear and type of bath. The resident was dependent on staff for partial to moderate for assistance with bathing and dressing. The Functional Abilities (Self-Care and Mobility) Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 01/06/25 documentation included the resident remained in the facility for assistance with cares. Resident has diagnosis included heart failure, major depressive disorder, respiratory failure, chronic kidney diseases, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The resident was incontinent of bladder and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 102 residents which included 21 residents sampled and seven reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living such as walking, grooming, toileting, dressing and eating) care. Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide baths and/or showers to six residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care, Resident (R) 27, R80, R79, R76, R88 and R82. These deficient practices led to a failure to ensure the necessary services required for good personal hygiene were provided to the residents in the facility. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 79's Electronic Health Record (EHR) bathing task list from 01/06/25 to 02/02/25 revealed the resident received bath on 01/06/25 and 02/02/25. Review of R80's EHR Bathing Task List from 01/05/25 to 02/03/25 revealed the resident received baths on 01/06/25, 01/09/25, 01/11/25, 01/12/25, 01/28/25 and 02/01/25 with a documented refusal of a bath on 02/02/25. Review of R27's EHR Bathing Task List from 01/05/25 to 02/03/25 revealed the resident received baths 01/06/25, 01/09/25 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-11 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 102 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve the residents of the facility food, which was palatable, attractive, and served at the appropriate temperature. Findings included: - During an interview on 01/30/25 at 12:48 PM, Resident (R) 92 reported food does not always taste good and is served cold. During an interview on 02/03/25 at 09:09 AM, R85 reported he felt like the kitchen staff do not care, the food is cold and does not taste well at times. During an observation on 02/04/25 the prepared food was placed on the steam table at 10:30 AM and had reached correct cooked temperatures. The pureed corn temperature read at 105 degrees Fahrenheit (F). These food items were below the required serving temperature of 135 degrees F. Dietary Staff CC used the same thermometer to complete temperatures on all the food. She used a white cloth towel that she picked up from the counter and wiped off the thermometer after each food item temperature was obtained with the same white…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 102 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner to prevent possible food-borne illness to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Observation of the kitchen and food storage areas on 01/30/25 at 11:15 AM, revealed the following areas of concern: A large bag of panko crumbs with a ripped hole in the center of the bag, not sealed properly. There was a piece of plastic wrap laid partially over the ripped hole, no date when bag was opened. Several bags of pasta were opened and not sealed. A bag of honey granola no date labeled when opened. Two standing freezers in dry storage area had several unidentifiable frozen items in the door no dates and no labels noted. Turkey burgers no expiration date and no label. On the top shelf of standing freezer was a bag of cut up potatoes and some kind of pink meat that had no label or date. Dietary Staff BB (Dietary Manager) reported that the bag of potatoes and turkey that was noted was just used and should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 102 residents with 21 residents sampled. Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to protect the dignity of Resident (R) 80 and R27 when the staff failed to remove unwanted facial hair and/or trim resident fingernails as needed. The facility further failed to ensure staff knocked before entering resident rooms and blinds were closed to the outside when performing resident care activities. These practices had the potential to lead to negative psychosocial effects related to dignity. Findings included: - An observation on 01/30/25 at 01:14 PM, R80 sat in his wheelchair with visitor present and visible facial hair over one inch long present on R80's face. During the obsesrvation an unknown staff member walked into R80's room without knocking or announcing themself. When the staff member was greeted by R80, the staff member turned around and walked out of the room. During an interview on 01/30/25 at 01:14 PM, R80 revealed he preferred to be clean shaven and stated staff had not assisted him. R80 stated the presence of his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 102 residents with 21sampled, which included three residents reviewed for choices. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide choices for dependent Resident (R) 82 related to her preferences for type and frequency of bath/shower. Findings included: - Review of the Resident (R)82's, Physician Orders, dated 05/18/22, revealed diagnoses which included anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, reduced mobility, obesity (severe overweight), and need for assistance with personal care. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documentation included her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. She reported it was very important to choose what clothes to wear and type of bath. The resident was partial to moderate dependent on staff for assistance with bathing and dressing. The Functional Abilities (Self-Care and Mobility) Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 01/06/25 documentation included the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 102 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the correct and complete Beneficiary Protection Notification Forms were issued to one of three residents reviewed, Resident (R)56. Findings included: - On 02/10/25 review of the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage Form CMS-10055 (SNF ABN) revealed Resident (R) 56 lacked the SNFABN form. On 02/11/25 at 10:49 AM, Administrative Staff A confirmed the form should have been given as required. The facility's policy Medicare Advance Beneficiary and Medicare Non-Coverage Notices dated September 2024, documented residents were given a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (CMA form 10055) when termination- if the facility proposes to stop furnishing all extended care items or services to a beneficiary because it expects that Medicare will not continue to pay for the items or services that a physician has ordered, the SNF ABN is issued to the beneficiary before such extended care items or services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 102 residents. The sample included 21 residents with eight reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide written notice for facility-initiated transfers for Residents (R) 79 or their representative when they were transferred to the hospital. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) census log for R79 revealed a discharge from the facility to a hospital on [DATE] and noted the resident readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Additionally, a discharge from the facility to a hospital on [DATE] and noted the resident readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EHR lacked documentation related to written notification of the resident or resident's representative related to this discharge/transfer. During an interview on 02/11/25 at 08:25 AM Social Services Designee (SSD) X revealed when a resident was sent to the hospital, the nursing staff would notify the resident and/or resident's representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 102, with 21 residents in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care for Resident (R) 88 related to obtaining ordered medications. Findings included: - Resident (R) 88's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), pain, and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/01/25, documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The assessment documented R88 was continent of bowel and occasionally incontinent of bladder and required substantial/maximal assistance with ADL's (activities of daily living such as grooming, shower, footwear). The Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented an order dated 12/09/24 for Replens external comfort vaginal gel (vaginal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 102 residents, with 21 sampled, one resident was reviewed for tube feeding (administration of nutritionally balanced liquefied foods or nutrients though a tube) management. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to check for residual (the volume of fluid remaining in the stomach at a point in time during enteral nutrition feeding) or placement prior to a bolus feed (a method of administering liquid nutrition through a feeding tube). Additionally, staff failed to have head of bed elevated for at least 60 minutes after a bolus feed was completed. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the resident's physical well-being. Findings include: - Review of R14's diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented, anorexia (lack or loss of appetite), metabolic encephalopathy (condition in which brain function is disturbed either temporarily or permanently due to different diseases or toxins in the body), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 102 residents with 21 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for dialysis (the clinical purification of blood by dialysis, as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney). Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure coordination of care between the dialysis center and the facility, for one Resident (R) 85, regarding a lack of regular dialysis communication sheets, with the facility. Findings included: - Review of R85's Electronic Health Record (EHR), revealed a diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD a condition in which the kidneys do not function normally and requires external support to meet the daily requirements of life). The 08/19/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. He received dialysis while a resident of the facility. No weight loss or gain concerns noted. The 08/23/24 Dehydration/Hydration Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R85 was on dialysis due to ESRD. Resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 98 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from misappropriation of medications when two tablets of Percocet (narcotic pain medication) were unaccounted for and never found by the facility. This deficient practice had the risk of missed medications and further misappropriation of medications for R1. Findings included: - R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness and primary generalized osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 05/15/24, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. R1 received scheduled pain medications and complained of occasional pain rated highest at eight out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 98 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for falls. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent falls for Resident (R) 2, who was at risk for falls. This deficient practice had the risk of further falls/injuries and unwarranted physical complications for R2. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) following cerebral infarction (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) affecting left non-dominant side, abnormal posture, generalized muscle weakness, and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) without behavioral disturbance. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 11/22/23, documented R2 had a Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample include 23 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement a system to allow residents and/or their representatives to file grievances anonymously. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased psychosocial wellbeing. Findings Included: - An inspection of the facility revealed grievance form available in the front lobby on a table. The inspection revealed the facility had no labeled grievance boxes or other visible method in place to submit the form anonymously. On 06/27/23 at 01:30PM in a confidential interview, Resident Council members reported they were not aware if the facility provided a way to complete an anonymous grievance. The council reported they turned their complaints into Social Services X. The council residents stated they were not aware of any grievance form drop box or system the facility had in place. On 06/28/23 at 12:20PM Social Services X reported the residents could put anonymous grievances in his mailbox outside his door. He…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
- The facility identified a census of 104 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control standards were followed related to hand hygiene during cares, disinfecting of shared equipment, monitoring of washing machine water temperature logs, and proper care for catheter (tube inserted into the bladder). The facility failed to ensure staff wore proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when care was provided for residents on enhanced barrier precautions. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to infectious diseases. Findings Included: - On 06/26/23 at 07:36 AM review of the washing machine water temperature logs from 03/01/23 to 06/26/23 (118 days) revealed laundry water temperatures were assessed and documented on the following dates: 03/24/23, 04/14/23, 04/21/23, 05/12/23, 05/19/23, 06/05/23, and 06/16/23. On 06/26/23 at 03:40PM Resident (R)88's urinary catheter collection bag sat on the floor next to his bed without a barrier to protect from contamination. On 06/28/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents. Based on observation, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean, home-like environment for all the residents who resided in the facility. This placed the affected residents at risk for impaired health and wellness. Findings included: - On 06/26/23 at 07:18 AM the north hallway had a strong urine odor. An unused oxygen concentrator sat in the hallway. On 06/26/23 at 07:30 AM the south hallway had empty armchairs lining the wall on one side of the hallway. Nursing staff stood on the other side of the hallway with medication carts. Residents had difficulty propelling their wheelchairs down the hallway. On 06/27/23 at 01:25 PM R20's window curtain-panel was discolored grey, torn, and pinned up to prevent the curtain from blocking the air flow from the heater/air conditioning system under the window. Wallpaper peeled away from the wall beside the heating/air conditioning device and behind the headboard of the bed. On 06/29/23 at 09:20 AM R38's room wallpaper peeled away from the wall. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents with three residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 88's urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) drainage bag was placed in a privacy bag and a privacy curtain was provided during personal care. This deficient practice placed R88 at risk for impaired dignity and decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R88's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of need for assistance with personal care and diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R88 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents with two reviewed for accommodation of needs. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide foot pedals for Resident (R)19's wheelchair. This placed the resident at risk for preventable accidents due to lack of necessary equipment. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R19's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of seizures (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), muscle weakness, morbid obesity (severely overweight). R19's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 03/21/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated she required extensive assistance from two staff for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents with three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices review. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)307, who had Medicare Part A days remaining, with an Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC CMS-form 10123) as required. This deficient practice placed R307 at risk for uninformed decisions and impaired ability to appeal. Findings Included: - A review of R307's Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 04/06/23 indicated she had a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated she had a planned discharge with no return anticipated. The MDS indicated she discharged to the community on 04/06/23. Review of R307's Electronic Medical Record indicated that her last covered day (LCD) for Medicare Part A services was 04/06/23. R307 was discharged from the facility on 04/06/23. The facilty was unable to provide evidence R307 received a NOMNC. On 06/28/23 an review of R307 Beneficiary Notification…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview that facility failed to ensure the residents were free from neglect when the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for Resident (R) 90 and R19. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired health and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R90 documented diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (a combination disorder with mood and psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), autistic disorder (a developmental disorder caused by differences in the brain), and cerebral ataxia (impaired ability to coordinate muscle movement). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R90 documented R90 had both long and short -term memory problems. R90 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents with four residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify as an allegation of abuse, and report to the appropriate abuse coordinator within the facility, when Resident (R)3 reported rough handling during cares to nursing staff. This placed R3 at risk for unidentified and ongoing abuse and /or neglect and related complications. Finding included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R3's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), morbid obesity (severely overweight), reduced mobility, unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, heart failure (severe failure of the heart to function properly), and rotator cuff tear (right shoulder tear). A review of R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 05/18/23 noted Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated she required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 with two reviewed for transfer notifications. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification of the reason and location for the facility-initiated transfer to the hospital for Resident (R)91 or her representative. This deficient practice placed R91 at risk of delayed care or uninformed choices. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R91's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure, hearing loss, muscle weakness, peripheral vascular disease (PVD-circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), urinary retention, acute kidney failure, type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and end stage renal disease. R91's Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 03/27/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 104. The sample included 23 residents with 23 reviewed for care plan revisions. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to complete care plan revisions for Residents (R)89. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ineffective treatment and unmet care needs. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R89's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), anoxic brain damage (brain damage caused by lack of oxygen), need for assistance with personal cares, traumatic brain injury, hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function), and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). A review of R89's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/14/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score could not be completed due to severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents with one resident reviewed for communication. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)70 received the necessary services to promote meaningful interaction and communication to support both physical and psychosocial needs in the presence of a language barrier. This deficient practice placed R70 at risk for unidentified care needs as well as risk for isolation and/or loneliness. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R70's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses for end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis (procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia [psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought]). The Annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents with six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) cares. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided for Resident (R) 38 who required assistance from staff to complete the care. This deficient practice placed resident R38 at risk for further potential skin breakdown and/or skin complications from not maintaining good personal hygiene and bathing practices. Findings included: - R38's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) affecting left non-dominant side. The Annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents with four residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)19 had a safe/functionable shower chair to prevent avoidable accidents. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R19's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of seizures (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), muscle weakness, morbid obesity (severely overweight). R19's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 03/21/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six indicating severe cognitive impairment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents with six residents reviewed for bowel/bladder incontinence, catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) and urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment for Resident (R) 88 and R83 with indwelling catheters when the facility failed to prevent the catheter drainage bag from resting on the floor and the facility failed to maintain the catheter drainage bag below R88's bladder. The facility also failed to have an appropriate indication for R88's catheter and have an anchor for the catheter tubing to prevent pulling a d injury. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk for catheter related complications. Findings included: - R88's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis (procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) facility regarding dialysis care and services and failed to obtain physician ordered weight for Resident (R) 305, who was on a fluid restriction and received dialysis. This deficient practice placed R305 at risk of physical complications related to dialysis. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R305 had diagnoses of end stage renal disease (inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes, concentrate urine and conserve electrolytes), dependence on renal dialysis (procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly), chronic pain syndrome, acute pain due to trauma, muscle weakness, fracture (broken bone) of second lumbar (lower back) vertebra (small bones forming the backbone), and altered mental status. The admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents with six residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the lack of pulse monitoring prior to the administration of a beta blocker (a medication used to slow down the action of the heart), for Resident (R)95. The facility failed to ensure the CP identified and reported an inappropriate indication for R93's antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medication Seroquel (antipsychotic) and R13's Vrylar (antipsychotic). The facility failed to ensure the CP identified and reported R13's blood glucose (the amount of sugar in the blood) levels that were outside of physician ordered parameters. This failure had to potential of unnecessary medication administration and related side effects for R95, R93, and R13. Findings included: -The electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R13's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), and constipation (difficulty passing stools). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented that R13 was dependent on two staff members assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS documented R13 had received insulin (medication to regulate blood sugar), antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people with excessive anxiety, nervousness, or tension), anticoagulant (class of medications used to prevent the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents with six residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 93's antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medication Seroquel and R13's antipsychotic Vrylar had an appropriate indication for use or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits. This failure had the potential of unnecessary antipsychotic medication use and related side effects for R93 and R13. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R93 documented diagnoses of anxiety (a mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), major depressive disorder (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents with three reviewed for physician lab result notification. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to notify the medical provider of Resident (R)21's abnormal digoxin (medication used to treat heart failure and irregular heartbeats) lab result. This deficient practice placed R21 at risk for delayed treatment and/or toxicity. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R21's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), chronic respiratory failure, and heart failure. R21's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 05/07/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score could not be completed due to severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated she took diuretics (medication to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered laboratory test results for Resident (R) 13 and R21 were included in the residents' clinical medical record. This deficient practice could result in unnecessary tests and delayed treatment. Findings included: - R13's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) lacked laboratory tests obtained on 04/17/23, 04/25/23, 05/09/23 and 06/21/23. Review of the EMR under Orders tab revealed physician order: Losartan potassium tablet 50 milligram (mg) give one tablet by mouth daily for hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Hold medication until creatine level (kidney function test) returns to baseline, then resume medication dated 04/11/23. On 06/27/23 at 09:24 AM R13 sat on electric wheelchair on the outside patio to smoke. On 06/29/23 at 04:03 PM Administrative Nurse D stated she expected the laboratory tests to be called to the physician upon results arrival and scanned into the medical record within the next day. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$46,331 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $27,967 — penalty dated 2025-02-11
- $14,518 — penalty dated 2023-12-21
- $2,098 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
- $1,748 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-13 for 18 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/20/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/20/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/20/2024 |
| BANDA, RUBEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/15/2024 |
| HARPER, LAUREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2025 |
| MCCUE, TAMARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/15/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/15/2024 |
| WICHITA REALTY ASSOCIATES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $264K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175168. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.